Performance & Stability
How Does the P&L Attribution Test Change a Bank’s Data Governance Strategy?
The P&L Attribution test elevates data governance from a compliance task to a core strategic function, demanding a unified data architecture to validate risk models.
How Does the P&L Attribution Test Specifically Challenge Desks Trading Illiquid Derivatives?
The P&L attribution test challenges illiquid derivative desks by demanding a verifiable alignment between complex pricing models and risk systems.
What Are the Primary Reasons a Trading Desk Might Fail Its P&L Attribution Test?
A P&L attribution test fails when a desk's risk models cannot explain its profits and losses, revealing a critical flaw in its systemic architecture.
What Are the Specific Data and Technological Hurdles for IMA P&L Attribution Testing?
The primary hurdles for IMA P&L attribution are data fragmentation, model divergence, and the lack of a unified technology architecture.
How Does the P&L Attribution Test under FRTB Impact the Viability of the Internal Model Approach for Trading Desks?
The FRTB P&L Attribution Test makes the Internal Model Approach viable only for desks with a unified front-office and risk system architecture.
How Does the P&L Attribution Test Influence a Bank’s Strategy for Managing Non-Modellable Risk Factors?
The P&L attribution test mandates a deep architectural alignment between a bank's front-office and risk systems.
How Does the P&L Attribution Test Impact a Bank’s Model Infrastructure?
The P&L Attribution Test forces a systemic overhaul of a bank's infrastructure, mandating the unification of pricing and risk models.
