Performance & Stability
        
        What Is the Difference in PFE Calculation between Margined and Unmargined Netting Sets?
        
         
        
        
          
        
        
      
        
     
        
        PFE for unmargined sets forecasts long-term, unchecked exposure; for margined sets, it models short-term risk during a collateral failure.
        
        How Does SA-CCR Change the Capital Treatment of Margined versus Unmargined Trades?
        
         
        
        
          
        
        
      
        
     
        
        SA-CCR systematically lowers capital for margined trades by reducing potential future exposure via a shorter risk horizon and a collateral-sensitive multiplier.
        
        To What Extent Are Cross-Asset Class Diversification Benefits Recognized within the SA-CCR Framework?
        
         
        
        
          
        
        
      
        
     
        
        SA-CCR recognizes diversification within narrow hedging sets but largely ignores it across asset classes, prioritizing standardization over risk sensitivity.
        
        How Does the EAD Cap Affect SA-CCR Calculations for Margined Sets?
        
         
        
        
          
        
        
      
        
     
        
        The EAD cap for margined sets under SA-CCR ensures capital requirements reflect the lesser of the margined EAD or the unmargined EAD.
        
        How Does the Choice of a Clearing Model Impact a Fund’s Leverage Ratio?
        
         
        
        
          
        
        
      
        
     
        
        A fund's clearing model dictates the methodology for calculating its derivatives exposure, directly shaping its clearing member's binding leverage ratio and, consequently, the fund's own capital costs and market access.
        
        What Is the Primary Justification for Capping Margined EAD at the Unmargined Level?
        
         
        
        
          
        
        
      
        
     
        
        Capping margined EAD at the unmargined level ensures risk models reflect the legal reality that collateralization cannot create greater exposure than its absence.
        
        How Does Multilateral Compression Impact a Firm’s Leverage Ratio under Basel III?
        
         
        
        
          
        
        
      
        
     
        
        Multilateral compression improves a firm's leverage ratio by surgically reducing gross notional derivatives exposure, thus freeing balance sheet capacity.
        
        Which Derivative Asset Classes See the Highest Capital Increases under SA-CCR?
        
         
        
        
          
        
        
      
        
     
        
        SA-CCR elevates capital for volatile asset classes like commodities and equities due to high supervisory factors and restrictive netting rules.
        
        What Are the Key Differences in PFE Calculation between SA-CCR and the Older CEM?
        
         
        
        
          
        
        
      
        
     
        
        SA-CCR elevates PFE calculation from CEM's static add-ons to a risk-sensitive framework that values collateral and precise hedging.
        
        How Does SA-CCR Differ from the Current Exposure Method for Netting?
        
         
        
        
          
        
        
      
        
     
        
        SA-CCR re-architects exposure calculation, replacing CEM's blunt metrics with a risk-sensitive system that rewards precise netting.
        
        How Do Regulatory Capital Requirements Influence the Choice between Cleared and Bilateral Trades?
        
         
        
        
          
        
        
      
        
     
        
        Regulatory capital frameworks structurally favor central clearing by imposing significant capital costs on the direct counterparty risk inherent in bilateral trades.
        
        What Are the Main Data Inputs Required for Calculating SA-CCR for a Margined Netting Set?
        
         
        
        
          
        
        
      
        
     
        
        SA-CCR calculation for a margined set requires trade economics and collateral agreement data to quantify current and potential future exposure.
        
        How Does SA-CCR Affect the Capital Requirements for Margined versus Unmargined Trades?
        
         
        
        
          
        
        
      
        
     
        
        SA-CCR systematically increases capital for unmargined trades by applying a long risk horizon, creating a direct economic incentive for collateralization.
        
        What Specific Questions Should a Treasurer Ask Their Bank about SA-CCR Pricing?
        
         
        
        
          
        
        
      
        
     
        
        A treasurer's inquiry into SA-CCR must deconstruct the bank's calculation system to architect optimal capital efficiency.
        
        What Are the Main Differences in the Treatment of Margined versus Unmargined Trades under SA-CCR?
        
         
        
        
          
        
        
      
        
     
        
        SA-CCR systematically lowers capital for margined trades by recognizing collateral's role in shortening the risk horizon.
        
        In What Ways Does the SA-CCR Calculation for Potential Future Exposure Recognize Hedging and Diversification?
        
         
        
        
          
        
        
      
        
     
        
        SA-CCR recognizes hedging and diversification via a hierarchical system of asset classes and hedging sets, applying full netting for direct hedges and partial offsetting for diversified risks through prescribed formulas.
        
        What Is the Impact of Multilateral Netting on a Firm’s Regulatory Capital Requirements?
        
         
        
        
          
        
        
      
        
     
        
        Multilateral netting structurally reduces a firm's regulatory capital burden by consolidating myriad exposures into a single, optimized position.
        
        How Do Netting Agreements Impact Aggregated Counterparty Exposure Calculations?
        
         
        
        
          
        
        
      
        
     
        
        A netting agreement transforms disparate gross exposures into a single net obligation, enabling a more precise and capital-efficient risk calculation.
        
        Can Central Clearing Completely Eliminate Potential Future Exposure under the SA-CCR Framework?
        
         
        
        
          
        
        
      
        
     
        
        Central clearing transforms, rather than eliminates, Potential Future Exposure by substituting bilateral risk with a structured, yet persistent, exposure to the CCP.
        
        What Is the Role of the Margin Period of Risk in Cleared versus Bilateral SA-CCR Calculations?
        
         
        
        
          
        
        
      
        
     
        
        The Margin Period of Risk is the critical time-based input in SA-CCR that scales capital requirements based on the efficiency of the default management process.
        
        How Does SA-CCR Differently Impact Cleared versus Non-Cleared Derivatives Portfolios?
        
         
        
        
          
        
        
      
        
     
        
        SA-CCR systematically rewards the structural integrity of central clearing by enabling superior netting efficiency and recognizing lower operational risk.
        
        What Is the Role of a Qualifying Master Netting Agreement in the PFE Calculation?
        
         
        
        
          
        
        
      
        
     
        
        A Qualifying Master Netting Agreement provides the legal framework to calculate counterparty risk on a net basis, reducing PFE and optimizing capital.
        
        How Does the Net-To-Gross Ratio Impact the Potential Future Exposure Calculation under the Basel Framework?
        
         
        
        
          
        
        
      
        
     
        
        The Net-to-Gross Ratio calibrates Potential Future Exposure by scaling it to the measured effectiveness of portfolio netting agreements.

 
  
  
  
  
 