Performance & Stability
        
        How Does the Rebuttable Presumption Rule Differ from the Absolute Bar Rule for Deficiencies?
        
         
        
        
          
        
        
      
        
     
        
        The rebuttable presumption rule allows a creditor to recover a deficiency despite a flawed sale by proving the collateral's true value, whereas the absolute bar rule completely forfeits that right for any procedural error.
        
        Can a Debtor Recover Damages from a Creditor Even If No Deficiency Is Sought?
        
         
        
        
          
        
        
      
        
     
        
        Yes, a debtor can sue for damages if a creditor's commercially unreasonable sale results in the loss of the debtor's equity, a right independent of any deficiency claim.
        
        How Does the Burden of Proof Shift in a Commercial Reasonableness Dispute?
        
         
        
        
          
        
        
      
        
     
        
        In a commercial reasonableness dispute, the burden of proof shifts to the creditor once the debtor challenges the collateral's disposition.
        
        What Objective Factors Do Courts Prioritize When Determining a Company’s COMI?
        
         
        
        
          
        
        
      
        
     
        
        Courts prioritize objective, verifiable evidence of a company's "nerve center," the ascertainable hub of its direction, control, and coordination.
        
        What Are the Legal Risks Associated with Deliberately Shifting a Firm’s Center of Main Interests?
        
         
        
        
          
        
        
      
        
     
        
        A firm's deliberate COMI shift is a high-risk maneuver where legal validity depends on proving the new jurisdiction is the genuine, ascertainable administrative core.
        
        What Are the Consequences of a Defective Notice of Disposition?
        
         
        
        
          
        
        
      
        
     
        
        A defective notice of disposition systemically compromises a creditor's recovery rights, creating significant financial and legal liabilities.
        
        What Are the Consequences If a Secured Creditor Fails to Conduct a Commercially Reasonable Sale?
        
         
        
        
          
        
        
      
        
     
        
        A secured creditor's failure to execute a commercially reasonable sale triggers systemic penalties that can eliminate or reduce deficiency claims.
        
        What Are the Consequences If a Court Finds a Close out Procedure Was Not Commercially Reasonable?
        
         
        
        
          
        
        
      
        
     
        
        A court finding of a commercially unreasonable close-out shifts liability to the creditor, jeopardizing their right to a deficiency judgment.
        
        What Are the Consequences for a Secured Creditor Who Fails to Conduct a Commercially Reasonable Sale?
        
         
        
        
          
        
        
      
        
     
        
        A secured creditor's failure to execute a commercially reasonable sale systematically exposes it to the loss of its deficiency claim.
        
        Can a Very Low Sale Price Alone Be Sufficient to Invalidate a UCC Foreclosure Sale?
        
         
        
        
          
        
        
      
        
     
        
        A low price alone does not invalidate a UCC sale; it triggers intense scrutiny of the sale's procedural integrity.
        
        What Are the Consequences of a Commercially Unreasonable Sale for a Creditor?
        
         
        
        
          
        
        
      
        
     
        
        A commercially unreasonable sale exposes a creditor to the loss of their deficiency claim, transforming a recovery action into a liability.
        
        What Are the Legal Ramifications of Failing to Use Commercially Reasonable Procedures?
        
         
        
        
          
        
        
      
        
     
        
        Failing to use commercially reasonable procedures shifts the burden of proof, jeopardizing a creditor's right to a deficiency judgment.

 
  
  
  
  
 