Performance & Stability
What Is a Request for Tender (RFT) and How Is It Different from an RFQ?
An RFT is a formal protocol to procure a complex solution, while an RFQ is a streamlined protocol to procure a specified good at the best price.
What Are the Key Differences in Contract Structure between a Tender and an Rfp Award?
A tender contract enforces strict compliance with predefined specifications, while an RFP award contract facilitates a flexible, collaborative partnership to achieve a negotiated outcome.
What Are the Key Differences in Risk Allocation between the Issuer and the Bidder in an Rfp versus a Tender?
An RFP shares risk to foster a collaborative solution; a tender transfers risk to secure a fixed price for a defined scope.
When Is a Legally Binding Rft a More Appropriate Choice than a Flexible Rfp?
A legally binding RFT is the optimal choice when project specifications are immutable and the primary goal is competitive, value-based execution.
How Does Risk Allocation Differ in an Rft versus an Rfp Contract?
An RFT allocates execution risk to the supplier for a defined spec; an RFP transfers solution risk to the supplier for a defined problem.
What Are the Legal Implications of a Poorly Differentiated Rft and Rfp Process?
A poorly differentiated RFT and RFP process creates significant legal and financial risks due to ambiguity and procedural unfairness.
What Are the Legal Differences between a Bid Submitted for an Rft and a Proposal for an Rfp?
A bid is a binding offer to a fixed specification; a proposal is a negotiable solution to a complex problem.
How Does Risk Allocation Shift between an Rft and an Rfp?
An RFT assigns execution risk to suppliers against a fixed buyer specification; an RFP transfers solution design risk to suppliers.
