# At What Stage of the Procurement Process Is It Unacceptable to Modify the Scoring Matrix? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-09
**Categories:** Question

---

![A reflective, metallic platter with a central spindle and an integrated circuit board edge against a dark backdrop. This imagery evokes the core low-latency infrastructure for institutional digital asset derivatives, illustrating high-fidelity execution and market microstructure dynamics](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-infrastructure-precision.jpg)

![Glowing teal conduit symbolizes high-fidelity execution pathways and real-time market microstructure data flow for digital asset derivatives. Smooth grey spheres represent aggregated liquidity pools and robust counterparty risk management within a Prime RFQ, enabling optimal price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-market-microstructure-prime-os.jpg)

## Concept

![A specialized hardware component, showcasing a robust metallic heat sink and intricate circuit board, symbolizes a Prime RFQ dedicated hardware module for institutional digital asset derivatives. It embodies market microstructure enabling high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols for block trade and multi-leg spread](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/prime-os-dedicated-hardware-for-institutional-rfq-execution.jpg)

## The Unalterable Covenant of Evaluation

The scoring matrix in a [procurement process](https://prime.greeks.live/area/procurement-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) represents a covenant with all potential bidders. It is a foundational instrument of [procedural fairness](https://prime.greeks.live/area/procedural-fairness/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), establishing a transparent and objective framework for decision-making. Its primary function is to translate an organization’s complex requirements into a quantifiable, defensible, and equitable system of evaluation. The central question of when this instrument becomes immutable is critical.

The answer defines the boundary between a competitive, transparent process and one that is vulnerable to disputes, legal challenges, and reputational damage. The process must be structured to ensure all participants are judged by the same predefined standards, fostering confidence in the system itself.

The definitive threshold, the point of no return, is the moment the procurement process is formally opened and bids or tenders are solicited from suppliers. Once the invitation to tender (ITT) or [request for proposal](https://prime.greeks.live/area/request-for-proposal/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (RFP) is issued and potential suppliers begin preparing their submissions based on the published [evaluation framework](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-should-an-evaluation-framework-adapt-for-high-frequency-versus-low-frequency-trading-strategies/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), the scoring matrix must be considered locked. Any modification after this point fundamentally alters the terms of engagement. It invalidates the basis upon which bidders have invested time and resources, creating an unequal playing field.

The European Court of Justice case, _Lianakis_ (Case 532/06), underscores this principle, affirming that potential tenderers must be aware of all [evaluation criteria](https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-criteria/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) and their relative importance at the time they prepare their tenders. This establishes a clear legal and ethical line that preserves the integrity of the entire procurement exercise.

> The scoring matrix must be finalized before the tender is issued; subsequent changes undermine the fairness and legality of the procurement.

![Central reflective hub with radiating metallic rods and layered translucent blades. This visualizes an RFQ protocol engine, symbolizing the Prime RFQ orchestrating multi-dealer liquidity for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-digital-asset-rfq-execution-and-liquidity-management.jpg)

## The Anatomy of a Scoring Matrix

A [scoring matrix](https://prime.greeks.live/area/scoring-matrix/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is more than a simple checklist; it is a weighted model of an organization’s priorities. It deconstructs a complex need into several core components, each with its own significance. These components typically fall into distinct categories:

- **Technical Merit** ▴ This assesses how well the proposed solution meets the functional and non-functional requirements outlined in the tender documents. It examines specifications, performance capabilities, and compatibility with existing systems. 

- **Commercial Viability** ▴ This evaluates the financial aspects of the bid, extending beyond the headline price. It includes analyses of the total cost of ownership, payment terms, and the financial stability of the bidding organization. 

- **Quality and Experience** ▴ This dimension considers the bidder’s track record, relevant case studies, team qualifications, and proposed quality assurance methodologies. It seeks to quantify the bidder’s ability to deliver on its promises. 

- **Risk and Compliance** ▴ This evaluates adherence to regulatory requirements, data security protocols, and the bidder’s proposed strategies for mitigating potential project risks. 

Each of these high-level criteria is broken down into specific, measurable sub-criteria. Every criterion and sub-criterion is assigned a weight, reflecting its relative importance to the overall project success. This granular structure is what allows for a detailed and objective comparison between vastly different proposals. The framework must be finalized through collaboration with all key internal stakeholders before the tender is released to ensure it comprehensively captures the organization’s needs. 

![A dark central hub with three reflective, translucent blades extending. This represents a Principal's operational framework for digital asset derivatives, processing aggregated liquidity and multi-leg spread inquiries](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-rfq-protocol-engine-for-high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

![A cutaway view reveals the intricate core of an institutional-grade digital asset derivatives execution engine. The central price discovery aperture, flanked by pre-trade analytics layers, represents high-fidelity execution capabilities for multi-leg spread and private quotation via RFQ protocols for Bitcoin options](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-rfq-protocol-engine-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-price-discovery-on-volatility-surface.jpg)

## Strategy

![Abstract geometric forms depict a Prime RFQ for institutional digital asset derivatives. A central RFQ engine drives block trades and price discovery with high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimizing-market-microstructure-for-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Preserving the Integrity of the Awarding System

The strategic decision to render a scoring matrix immutable after tender issuance is a foundational act of governance. This rigidity is a feature, designed to protect the organization from internal biases and external pressures. A fixed evaluation framework ensures that the award decision is directly traceable to the organization’s stated priorities, making it defensible to internal audits, executive boards, and, if necessary, judicial review. This commitment to the process fosters a competitive and healthy supplier market.

When bidders perceive a procurement process as fair and transparent, they are more likely to invest the significant resources required to submit high-quality, competitive proposals. Conversely, a process where the rules can change mid-game discourages participation and can lead to receiving fewer, lower-quality bids.

Modifying the scoring criteria after receiving bids introduces a severe risk of actual or perceived bias. It can create an appearance that the criteria were changed to favor a specific, predetermined bidder. Such actions can trigger formal protests and costly legal challenges from unsuccessful bidders, potentially delaying or even nullifying the entire procurement process.

The core of such a legal challenge would be the breach of procedural fairness and equal treatment, principles that are central to public and private sector procurement regulations worldwide. Maintaining the sanctity of the original scoring matrix is therefore a primary [risk mitigation](https://prime.greeks.live/area/risk-mitigation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) strategy.

![A precise mechanical instrument with intersecting transparent and opaque hands, representing the intricate market microstructure of institutional digital asset derivatives. This visual metaphor highlights dynamic price discovery and bid-ask spread dynamics within RFQ protocols, emphasizing high-fidelity execution and latent liquidity through a robust Prime RFQ for atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineering-driving-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-across-advanced-rfq-protocols-and-prime-brokerage-frameworks.jpg)

## The Stages of Matrix Finality

The procurement lifecycle can be viewed through the lens of the scoring matrix’s state. Understanding the permissible actions at each stage is key to a well-run process. A failure to adhere to this discipline can have cascading negative consequences, as outlined below.

### Table 1 ▴ Matrix Modification Rules by Procurement Stage

| Procurement Stage | Permissible Actions | Prohibited Actions | Strategic Rationale |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Pre-Tender Release | Full modification of criteria, sub-criteria, weightings, and scoring methodology. Stakeholder collaboration is essential. | Finalizing the matrix without input from all relevant departments. | This is the developmental phase. The goal is to build a robust and comprehensive evaluation framework that accurately reflects project needs. |
| Tender Live / Bids in Preparation | Issuing minor clarifications of existing criteria in response to bidder questions, provided they are shared with all bidders. | Changing any scoring criteria, weights, or the fundamental evaluation methodology. | To ensure a level playing field. All bidders must base their proposals on the identical set of rules and priorities. |
| Post-Bid Submission / Evaluation in Progress | Strict application of the published scoring matrix to all submitted bids. Documenting the rationale for every score given. | Altering scores based on group consensus without individual justification, changing weights, or introducing new, undisclosed criteria. | This is the execution of the evaluation covenant. The process must be objective, consistent, and meticulously documented to withstand scrutiny. |
| Post-Award Notification | Providing debriefs to unsuccessful bidders that explain their scores against the established criteria. | Re-scoring bids or altering the decision based on bidder complaints or internal second thoughts. | To provide transparency and maintain confidence in the fairness of the process, while defending the final, data-driven decision. |

> The strategic value of a fixed scoring matrix lies in its power to ensure defensibility, mitigate legal risk, and foster a competitive supplier environment.

![Angular dark planes frame luminous turquoise pathways converging centrally. This visualizes institutional digital asset derivatives market microstructure, highlighting RFQ protocols for private quotation and high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-rfq-protocols-for-institutional-digital-assets.jpg)

## Clarification versus Modification

A critical distinction exists between clarifying a criterion and modifying it. Clarification aims to resolve ambiguity in the original tender documents. For instance, if a criterion asks for “relevant experience,” a bidder might ask for clarification on the desired scope (e.g. “Does ‘relevant’ refer to industry-specific experience or project scale?”).

Providing a specific answer to all bidders is an acceptable form of clarification. It helps evaluators apply the existing criterion consistently. A modification, in contrast, would be to change the weighting of the “relevant experience” criterion after seeing that a favored bidder is weak in that area, or to introduce a new sub-criterion for “local experience” that was not in the original tender. Such a change fundamentally alters the evaluation basis and is unacceptable.

![A sleek, dark teal surface contrasts with reflective black and an angular silver mechanism featuring a blue glow and button. This represents an institutional-grade RFQ platform for digital asset derivatives, embodying high-fidelity execution in market microstructure for block trades, optimizing capital efficiency via Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-platform-interface-optimizing-rfq-protocols-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

![A precise teal instrument, symbolizing high-fidelity execution and price discovery, intersects angular market microstructure elements. These structured planes represent a Principal's operational framework for digital asset derivatives, resting upon a reflective liquidity pool for aggregated inquiry via RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-platform-underpinning-rfq-protocol-liquidity-aggregation-and-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Execution

![Sleek, abstract system interface with glowing green lines symbolizing RFQ pathways and high-fidelity execution. This visualizes market microstructure for institutional digital asset derivatives, emphasizing private quotation and dark liquidity within a Prime RFQ framework, enabling best execution and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocol-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

## An Operational Playbook for Matrix Integrity

Executing a procurement process with an unassailable scoring matrix requires a disciplined, front-loaded effort. The integrity of the final decision is forged in the meticulous planning that occurs before the tender is ever released to the market. This operational playbook outlines the critical steps for creating and locking down a defensible evaluation framework.

- **Convene a Cross-Functional Evaluation Committee.** Before any criteria are drafted, identify all stakeholders who have a vested interest in the outcome of the procurement. This includes representatives from the end-user department, IT, finance, legal, and procurement itself. This committee is responsible for defining the requirements and agreeing on their relative importance. 

- **Define and Deconstruct Requirements.** The committee must translate the high-level business need into a set of specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART) requirements. These requirements will form the basis of the scoring criteria. Vague criteria like “user-friendly” must be broken down into quantifiable elements, such as “time to complete key tasks” or “compliance with specific accessibility standards.” 

- **Assign Weights and Scoring Mechanisms.** The committee must debate and agree on the percentage weight for each evaluation criterion. This is a critical step that codifies the organization’s priorities. A clear scoring mechanism (e.g. a 0-5 scale) must be defined, with detailed descriptors for what constitutes each score level. This removes ambiguity and guides evaluators toward consistent scoring. 

- **Conduct a Pre-Mortem Analysis.** Before finalizing the matrix, the committee should conduct a “pre-mortem.” They should imagine the procurement has failed or been successfully challenged. What were the likely causes? Was a key criterion missed? Were the weightings wrong? This exercise helps identify weaknesses in the matrix before it is too late to correct them. 

- **Formal Sign-Off and Lock-In.** Once the matrix is finalized, it must be formally signed off by the committee chair or project sponsor. In modern e-procurement systems, this is the point where the framework is digitally locked. Access to modify the matrix should be restricted, with any changes requiring a formal, audited process that would necessitate re-issuing the tender. 

- **Train the Evaluators.** All individuals who will be scoring the bids must be trained on the finalized matrix. They need to understand the meaning of each criterion, the weighting, and the detailed definitions for each score. This ensures that the evaluation is conducted consistently across the entire team. 

![A sleek, pointed object, merging light and dark modular components, embodies advanced market microstructure for digital asset derivatives. Its precise form represents high-fidelity execution, price discovery via RFQ protocols, emphasizing capital efficiency, institutional grade alpha generation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-digital-asset-rfq-execution-system-microstructure.jpg)

## Quantitative Modeling in Practice

The following table provides a hypothetical scoring matrix for the procurement of a new enterprise resource planning (ERP) system. It demonstrates how high-level requirements are broken down into weighted criteria and sub-criteria, leaving no ambiguity in the evaluation process.

### Table 2 ▴ Sample Scoring Matrix for an ERP System Procurement

| Criterion | Sub-Criterion | Weight | Scoring Method (0-5) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Technical Solution (50%) | Core Financial Modules Functionality | 20% | 0=Fails to meet reqs; 5=Exceeds all reqs with added value |
| Commercial Proposal (30%) | Total Cost of Ownership (5 Years) | 20% | Formula-based ▴ Lowest cost receives max points |
| Vendor Capability (20%) | Demonstrated Experience (Similar Scale) | 10% | 0=No experience; 5=3+ verifiable case studies |

> A robust evaluation framework is built upon specific, measurable criteria and a pre-defined, weighted scoring mechanism.

![A central, intricate blue mechanism, evocative of an Execution Management System EMS or Prime RFQ, embodies algorithmic trading. Transparent rings signify dynamic liquidity pools and price discovery for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-framework-driving-high-fidelity-rfq-execution-and-optimized-market-microstructure-for-capital-efficiency.jpg)

## Predictive Scenario Analysis a Tale of Two Procurements

Consider a large municipality issuing a tender for waste management services. The scoring matrix is 60% technical (collection frequency, recycling rates, fleet quality) and 40% price. After the bids are submitted, a senior official realizes that a local, politically connected company (Company A) has submitted a very high price but has an excellent local reputation. The winning bid on paper belongs to a large national firm (Company B) with a much lower price but less local presence.

The official pressures the procurement committee to re-evaluate the bids, suggesting they should have included a 20% weighting for “local economic impact.” The committee, succumbing to the pressure, adjusts the matrix and re-scores the bids. Company A now wins the contract.

The result is predictable. Company B immediately files a formal protest, citing the mid-stream change to the evaluation criteria. Legal proceedings halt the [contract award](https://prime.greeks.live/area/contract-award/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). News of the manipulation leaks to the press, causing a political scandal and eroding public trust.

After months of legal fees and delays, the court nullifies the procurement. The municipality is forced to restart the entire process, having wasted immense time and money, all while its reputation is in tatters. The attempt to manipulate the outcome destroyed the very process it was meant to serve.

In a parallel scenario, the municipality’s procurement team follows the operational playbook. They establish the 60/40 Technical/Price matrix after extensive internal consultation. The tender is issued. The same bids are received.

Company B is the clear winner based on the pre-defined criteria. The committee documents its scoring meticulously and awards the contract to Company B. Company A lodges an informal complaint. The procurement director provides a full debrief, walking Company A’s team through their scores against the publicly available matrix. The director demonstrates that Company B won fairly based on the established rules.

While disappointed, Company A can see the process was fair and transparent. The municipality secures a cost-effective, high-quality service without delay or dispute, its institutional integrity intact.

![Three interconnected units depict a Prime RFQ for institutional digital asset derivatives. The glowing blue layer signifies real-time RFQ execution and liquidity aggregation, ensuring high-fidelity execution across market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-liquidity-aggregation-os.jpg)

## References

- Arrowsmith, Sue. _The Law of Public and Utilities Procurement ▴ Regulation in the EU and UK, Volume 1_. Sweet & Maxwell, 2014.

- Trepte, Peter. _Public Procurement in the EU ▴ A Practitioner’s Guide_. Oxford University Press, 2007.

- Thai, Khi V. “International public procurement ▴ Concepts and practices.” In _International Handbook of Public Procurement_, edited by Khi V. Thai, 1-24. CRC Press, 2009.

- Schapper, P. R. & N. J. Veiga Malta. “The context of public procurement.” In _International Handbook of Public Procurement_, edited by Khi V. Thai, 25-46. CRC Press, 2009.

- Hui, W. S. G. Ofori, and T. L. T. Wong. “A framework for evaluating the procurement system.” _Construction Management and Economics_, vol. 20, no. 1, 2002, pp. 85-96.

- European Court of Justice. Case 532/06, _Lianakis and Others_. 2008.

- Flynn, A. & L. C. Farrell. “Public procurement and the private sector ▴ A relationship of trust?” _Journal of Public Procurement_, vol. 14, no. 2, 2014, pp. 202-231.

- Best Practice Group. “How to create an evaluation framework for procurement tenders.” 2022.

- Procurement Office. “Flawed Consensus Scoring Triggers Re-Evaluation.” 2018.

![Abstract geometric design illustrating a central RFQ aggregation hub for institutional digital asset derivatives. Radiating lines symbolize high-fidelity execution via smart order routing across dark pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-high-fidelity-execution-architecture.jpg)

## Reflection

![A crystalline sphere, representing aggregated price discovery and implied volatility, rests precisely on a secure execution rail. This symbolizes a Principal's high-fidelity execution within a sophisticated digital asset derivatives framework, connecting a prime brokerage gateway to a robust liquidity pipeline, ensuring atomic settlement and minimal slippage for institutional block trades](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-platform-optimizing-liquidity-and-risk-management-through-advanced-protocols.jpg)

## The System as the Guardian of Objectivity

The discipline surrounding the procurement scoring matrix is a reflection of an organization’s operational maturity. It reveals a deep understanding that a robust process is the most effective defense against arbitrary decision-making. The matrix itself is an artifact of a larger system, a system designed to translate strategic intent into a fair and defensible outcome. Contemplating the immutability of this document prompts a broader examination of an organization’s internal frameworks.

How are priorities set? How are decisions documented? How is fairness architected into the core of operational protocols? The strength of the scoring matrix is derived not from the complexity of its formulas, but from the institutional commitment to its principles. This commitment is the true bedrock of a successful procurement function.

![A sophisticated, multi-layered trading interface, embodying an Execution Management System EMS, showcases institutional-grade digital asset derivatives execution. Its sleek design implies high-fidelity execution and low-latency processing for RFQ protocols, enabling price discovery and managing multi-leg spreads with capital efficiency across diverse liquidity pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-platform-market-microstructure.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/procurement-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precision mechanism with a central circular core and a linear element extending to a sharp tip, encased in translucent material. This symbolizes an institutional RFQ protocol's market microstructure, enabling high-fidelity execution and price discovery for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-microstructure-facilitating-optimal-price-discovery-and-best-execution.jpg)

## Procurement Process

Meaning ▴ The Procurement Process defines a formalized methodology for acquiring necessary resources, such as liquidity, derivatives products, or technology infrastructure, within a controlled, auditable framework specifically tailored for institutional digital asset operations. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/procedural-fairness/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A dark, reflective surface displays a luminous green line, symbolizing a high-fidelity RFQ protocol channel within a Crypto Derivatives OS. This signifies precise price discovery for digital asset derivatives, ensuring atomic settlement and optimizing portfolio margin](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-pathway-optimizing-principal-liquidity-and-capital-efficiency.jpg)

## Procedural Fairness

Meaning ▴ Procedural Fairness, within a digital asset derivatives ecosystem, denotes the consistent and impartial application of predefined rules and processes to all market participants, ensuring that no entity receives preferential treatment or suffers arbitrary disadvantage. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-should-an-evaluation-framework-adapt-for-high-frequency-versus-low-frequency-trading-strategies/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A central metallic RFQ engine anchors radiating segmented panels, symbolizing diverse liquidity pools and market segments. Varying shades denote distinct execution venues within the complex market microstructure, facilitating price discovery for institutional digital asset derivatives with minimal slippage and latency via high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principals-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-nexus.jpg)

## Evaluation Framework

An evaluation framework adapts by calibrating its measurement of time, cost, and risk to the strategy's specific operational tempo. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/request-for-proposal/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A central concentric ring structure, representing a Prime RFQ hub, processes RFQ protocols. Radiating translucent geometric shapes, symbolizing block trades and multi-leg spreads, illustrate liquidity aggregation for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine-4.jpg)

## Request for Proposal

Meaning ▴ A Request for Proposal, or RFP, constitutes a formal, structured solicitation document issued by an institutional entity seeking specific services, products, or solutions from prospective vendors. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-criteria/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Symmetrical beige and translucent teal electronic components, resembling data units, converge centrally. This Institutional Grade RFQ execution engine enables Price Discovery and High-Fidelity Execution for Digital Asset Derivatives, optimizing Market Microstructure and Latency via Prime RFQ for Block Trades](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-engine.jpg)

## Evaluation Criteria

Meaning ▴ Evaluation Criteria define the quantifiable metrics and qualitative standards against which the performance, compliance, or risk profile of a system, strategy, or transaction is rigorously assessed. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/scoring-matrix/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![The image depicts two intersecting structural beams, symbolizing a robust Prime RFQ framework for institutional digital asset derivatives. These elements represent interconnected liquidity pools and execution pathways, crucial for high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement within market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-cross-market-execution-architecture-for-digital-assets.jpg)

## Scoring Matrix

Meaning ▴ A scoring matrix is a computational construct assigning quantitative values to inputs within automated decision frameworks. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/risk-mitigation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precision-engineered metallic component with a central circular mechanism, secured by fasteners, embodies a Prime RFQ engine. It drives institutional liquidity and high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives, facilitating atomic settlement of block trades and private quotation within market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-platform-rfq-engine-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-atomic-settlement-of-block-trades.jpg)

## Risk Mitigation

Meaning ▴ Risk Mitigation involves the systematic application of controls and strategies designed to reduce the probability or impact of adverse events on a system's operational integrity or financial performance. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/contract-award/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A central core represents a Prime RFQ engine, facilitating high-fidelity execution. Transparent, layered structures denote aggregated liquidity pools and multi-leg spread strategies](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-engine-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

## Contract Award

Meaning ▴ The Contract Award signifies the formal designation of a counterparty as the successful bidder or negotiator for a digital asset derivative instrument, solidifying the precise terms of the transaction. </a>

**Tags:** [Bid Evaluation](https://options.greeks.live/area/bid-evaluation/), [Contract Award](https://options.greeks.live/area/contract-award/), [Procurement Ethics](https://options.greeks.live/area/procurement-ethics/), [Procedural Fairness](https://options.greeks.live/area/procedural-fairness/), [Legal Compliance](https://options.greeks.live/area/legal-compliance/), [Supplier Selection](https://options.greeks.live/area/supplier-selection/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [How Can an Organization’S Conduct during Vendor Debriefings Affect the RFP’s Legal Status?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organizations-conduct-during-vendor-debriefings-affect-the-rfps-legal-status/)
![Abstract geometric forms in blue and beige represent institutional liquidity pools and market segments. A metallic rod signifies RFQ protocol connectivity for atomic settlement of digital asset derivatives. This visualizes high-fidelity execution and price discovery across diverse trading venues, emphasizing capital efficiency and minimizing slippage.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-market-microstructure-1.jpg)

A vendor debriefing's conduct directly shapes an RFP's legal defensibility by either validating or undermining the perceived fairness of the award.

- 
### [What Are the Legal Consequences of a Biased or Improperly Conducted Rfp Committee Evaluation?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-legal-consequences-of-a-biased-or-improperly-conducted-rfp-committee-evaluation/)
![A modular institutional trading interface displays a precision trackball and granular controls on a teal execution module. Parallel surfaces symbolize layered market microstructure within a Principal's operational framework, enabling high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-controls.jpg)

A biased RFP evaluation breaches the implied contract of fairness, exposing an organization to legal challenges, financial penalties, and severe reputational damage.

- 
### [What Are the Core Components of a Legally Defensible Rfp Evaluation Process?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-core-components-of-a-legally-defensible-rfp-evaluation-process/)
![Stacked, distinct components, subtly tilted, symbolize the multi-tiered institutional digital asset derivatives architecture. Layers represent RFQ protocols, private quotation aggregation, core liquidity pools, and atomic settlement. This design optimizes market microstructure for high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/layered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-optimizing-principal-execution-management-systems-for-best-execution.jpg)

A legally defensible RFP evaluation is a system of transparent criteria, objective scoring, and meticulous documentation that proves fairness and substantiates the best-value decision.

- 
### [What Are the Most Common Reasons for an Rfp to Be Canceled by the Issuing Organization?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-reasons-for-an-rfp-to-be-canceled-by-the-issuing-organization/)
![A metallic precision tool rests on a circuit board, its glowing traces depicting market microstructure and algorithmic trading. A reflective disc, symbolizing a liquidity pool, mirrors the tool, highlighting high-fidelity execution and price discovery for institutional digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols and Principal's Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-driving-high-fidelity-execution-and-market-microstructure-optimization-via-principal-prime-os.jpg)

An RFP cancellation is a systemic signal of a misalignment between an organization's strategic intent and its executional capability.

- 
### [What Are the Key Differences between an Rfp and a Formal Tender in the Context of Public Sector Procurement Law?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-between-an-rfp-and-a-formal-tender-in-the-context-of-public-sector-procurement-law/)
![A slender metallic probe extends between two curved surfaces. This abstractly illustrates high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives, driving price discovery within market microstructure. It represents Prime RFQ protocol precision navigating dark liquidity for best execution and capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-instrument-navigating-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-for-optimal-price-discovery-and-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

An RFP sources innovative solutions through negotiation; a formal tender procures specified goods via binding price competition.

- 
### [Under What Specific Circumstances Is It Considered Acceptable to Modify an Rfp Scoring Matrix?](https://options.greeks.live/question/under-what-specific-circumstances-is-it-considered-acceptable-to-modify-an-rfp-scoring-matrix/)
![A central core, symbolizing a Crypto Derivatives OS and Liquidity Pool, is intersected by two abstract elements. These represent Multi-Leg Spread and Cross-Asset Derivatives executed via RFQ Protocol. This visual embodies High-Fidelity Execution within an Institutional Trading framework, emphasizing Market Microstructure and Capital Efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-multi-leg-spread-execution.jpg)

Modifying an RFP scoring matrix is acceptable only to correct errors or clarify scope, and must be executed via a formal, transparent addendum to all vendors.

- 
### [How Do Evaluation Criteria Differ between a Request for Proposal and a Request for Quotation?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-evaluation-criteria-differ-between-a-request-for-proposal-and-a-request-for-quotation/)
![Abstract spheres depict segmented liquidity pools within a unified Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives. Intersecting blades symbolize precise RFQ protocol negotiation, price discovery, and high-fidelity execution of multi-leg spread strategies, reflecting market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-1.jpg)

An RFP evaluates a vendor's proposed solution and capabilities; an RFQ evaluates a vendor's price for a specified item.

- 
### [What Are the Best Practices for Structuring a Legally Defensible RFP Debriefing Session?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-best-practices-for-structuring-a-legally-defensible-rfp-debriefing-session/)
![A polished Prime RFQ surface frames a glowing blue sphere, symbolizing a deep liquidity pool. Its precision fins suggest algorithmic price discovery and high-fidelity execution within an RFQ protocol. This system optimizes institutional digital asset derivatives trading, ensuring capital efficiency and minimizing slippage.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-intelligence.jpg)

A legally defensible debriefing is the systematic exposition of a meticulously documented and fairly executed evaluation process.

- 
### [How Does a Privilege Clause Affect the Bargaining Power of Bidders in a Procurement Process?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-privilege-clause-affect-the-bargaining-power-of-bidders-in-a-procurement-process/)
![Polished metallic disks, resembling data platters, with a precise mechanical arm poised for high-fidelity execution. This embodies an institutional digital asset derivatives platform, optimizing RFQ protocol for efficient price discovery, managing market microstructure, and leveraging a Prime RFQ intelligence layer to minimize execution latency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-precision-execution-via-advanced-rfq-protocols-and-prime-os-intelligence-layer-for-optimal-market-microstructure.jpg)

A privilege clause shifts procurement from a price-based contest to a discretionary value judgment, fundamentally reducing bidder leverage.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "At What Stage of the Procurement Process Is It Unacceptable to Modify the Scoring Matrix?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/at-what-stage-of-the-procurement-process-is-it-unacceptable-to-modify-the-scoring-matrix/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/at-what-stage-of-the-procurement-process-is-it-unacceptable-to-modify-the-scoring-matrix/"
    },
    "headline": "At What Stage of the Procurement Process Is It Unacceptable to Modify the Scoring Matrix? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "The scoring matrix becomes unalterable upon tender issuance, ensuring the procurement's integrity and defensibility. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/at-what-stage-of-the-procurement-process-is-it-unacceptable-to-modify-the-scoring-matrix/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-09T19:42:57+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-08-09T19:43:02+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-prime-os-execution-interface.jpg",
        "caption": "A sophisticated, glossy black and metallic interface features illuminated green and blue indicators, suggesting a control system for advanced financial operations. This visual metaphor embodies the precision and intelligence of an institutional digital asset derivatives platform. It depicts the market microstructure of RFQ protocols, enabling block trade execution and private quotation management. The system's intelligence layer optimizes price discovery and liquidity aggregation, ensuring best execution and robust risk management."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Bid Evaluation",
        "Contract Award",
        "Evaluation Criteria",
        "Legal Compliance",
        "Procedural Fairness",
        "Procurement Ethics",
        "Procurement Process",
        "Public Procurement",
        "Request for Proposal",
        "Risk Mitigation",
        "Scoring Matrix",
        "Supplier Selection",
        "Tender Evaluation"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/at-what-stage-of-the-procurement-process-is-it-unacceptable-to-modify-the-scoring-matrix/
