# Can a Bidder Be Disqualified for Failing to Acknowledge a Non-Material Change to an Rfp? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-10
**Categories:** Question

---

![A sleek, pointed object, merging light and dark modular components, embodies advanced market microstructure for digital asset derivatives. Its precise form represents high-fidelity execution, price discovery via RFQ protocols, emphasizing capital efficiency, institutional grade alpha generation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-digital-asset-rfq-execution-system-microstructure.jpg)

![A high-precision, dark metallic circular mechanism, representing an institutional-grade RFQ engine. Illuminated segments denote dynamic price discovery and multi-leg spread execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine-7.jpg)

## Concept

The question of disqualifying a bidder for failing to acknowledge a [non-material change](https://prime.greeks.live/area/non-material-change/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) to a Request for Proposal (RFP) probes the very core of [procurement integrity](https://prime.greeks.live/area/procurement-integrity/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) and risk allocation. From a systemic viewpoint, every stipulation within an RFP and its subsequent amendments functions as a protocol layer, designed to ensure a uniform basis for competition and a predictable set of obligations for the resulting contract. The acknowledgment of an amendment is the procedural handshake, a confirmation that all participants are operating from an identical playbook. When that confirmation is missing, the issuing entity faces a critical decision that balances procedural formalism against the pragmatic goal of maximizing competition.

At the heart of this decision lies the legal and operational distinction between material and non-material changes. A material amendment fundamentally alters the legal obligations, scope, price, quantity, quality, or delivery schedule of the procurement. Failure to acknowledge such a change is almost invariably fatal to a bid, as it creates an unacceptable ambiguity; the bidder cannot be held to terms they have not accepted, giving them an unfair option to either accept or reject the altered terms after all other bids are revealed. This introduces a level of risk and uncertainty that procurement systems are specifically designed to eliminate.

> A non-material change, conversely, does not substantially alter the core obligations or the competitive landscape of the procurement.

A non-material alteration, often termed a [minor informality](https://prime.greeks.live/area/minor-informality/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), represents a deviation from the RFP’s requirements that has a negligible impact on the procurement’s essential parameters. Examples include clerical corrections, extensions of response deadlines, or clarifications that do not introduce new requirements. The [Federal Acquisition Regulation](https://prime.greeks.live/area/federal-acquisition-regulation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (FAR), a foundational text for government procurement that heavily influences private sector practices, provides a framework for waiving such minor informalities. The capacity to waive the acknowledgment of a non-material change is a discretionary power held by the issuing entity.

It is a tool for preventing the procedural exclusion of an otherwise viable and competitive proposal due to a minor administrative oversight. The core principle is that the punishment, disqualification, should fit the crime, the failure to acknowledge. In this context, disqualifying a bidder for a non-material lapse could be viewed as a disproportionate and counterproductive response, potentially harming the issuer’s own interest by narrowing the field of competition without a compelling reason.

![A sleek, black and beige institutional-grade device, featuring a prominent optical lens for real-time market microstructure analysis and an open modular port. This RFQ protocol engine facilitates high-fidelity execution of multi-leg spreads, optimizing price discovery for digital asset derivatives and accessing latent liquidity](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-for-high-fidelity-price-discovery-and-latent-liquidity-aggregation-across-multi-leg-spreads.jpg)

## Defining the Materiality Threshold

The distinction between a material and non-material change is the central pivot upon which any decision to disqualify must turn. There is no universal, black-and-white rule; materiality is assessed on a case-by-case basis, analyzing the specific context of the procurement. However, a consistent analytical framework has emerged from decades of government and commercial procurement precedent, primarily through bodies like the Government Accountability Office (GAO).

An amendment is considered material if it could have more than a negligible impact on price, quantity,quality, or delivery. It imposes new legal obligations or alters the rights of the parties involved.

Consider an RFP for IT support services. An amendment that changes the required cybersecurity certification for all personnel is unequivocally material. It directly impacts the bidder’s cost structure, staffing qualifications (quality), and ability to perform the work. An amendment that corrects a typographical error in a non-critical clause or extends the proposal submission deadline by 48 hours would almost certainly be deemed non-material.

The first amendment changes the fundamental basis of the offer; the second merely adjusts the administrative parameters of the competition. This analytical process requires a sophisticated understanding of the procurement’s objectives. What might be non-material in one context could be material in another. For instance, a change in delivery location might be trivial for a software provider but profoundly material for a logistics company whose entire bid is based on transportation costs.

![Angularly connected segments portray distinct liquidity pools and RFQ protocols. A speckled grey section highlights granular market microstructure and aggregated inquiry complexities for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-efficiency.jpg)

## The Role of Bidder Acknowledgment

Acknowledgment serves a critical systemic function ▴ it confirms a meeting of the minds and ensures that the bidder’s offer is a firm, irrevocable commitment to all terms of the solicitation, as amended. Without this confirmation for a material change, the [issuing entity](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-role-of-a-designated-publishing-entity-in-post-trade-reporting/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is exposed to risk. The bidder could potentially argue after bid opening that their price was based on the original, un-amended solicitation, giving them an unfair “second bite at the apple.” They could choose to be bound by the amendment if it suits them or reject it if it does not. This optionality undermines the entire principle of sealed, competitive bidding.

For non-material changes, this risk is substantially diminished. Because the change has a negligible impact, the bidder’s fundamental offer remains intact. Their price, quality, and ability to deliver are unaffected. Therefore, the issuing entity can, in many cases, reasonably infer that the bidder’s silence does not represent a rejection of the new term but rather an administrative oversight.

The decision to waive the acknowledgment is a calculated one, premised on the assumption that the bidder, by submitting their proposal, intends to be bound by the entirety of the RFP, including its minor administrative adjustments. This waiver prevents the procurement process from becoming a rigid, hyper-technical exercise where valuable proposals are discarded on minor procedural grounds.

### Table 1 ▴ Comparative Analysis of RFP Amendment Materiality

| Amendment Characteristic | Example of Material Change | Example of Non-Material Change | Primary Impact on Bid | Typical Issuer Response to Non-Acknowledgment |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Scope of Work | Adding a requirement for 10,500 linear feet of new fencing maintenance to a groundskeeping contract. | Correcting the room number for a pre-bid conference. | Directly alters cost, labor, and resource allocation. | Mandatory disqualification. |
| Legal Obligations | Changing the time within which an option can be exercised by the issuer. | Updating the contact information for the procurement officer. | Modifies the legal rights and responsibilities of the parties post-award. | Mandatory disqualification. |
| Pricing Structure | Changing a Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) from a fixed “job” price to a recurring “monthly” price. | A minor increase in the mileage reimbursement rate. | Fundamentally changes how the bid must be priced and evaluated. | Mandatory disqualification. |
| Delivery Schedule | Accelerating the required project completion date by 30 days. | Extending the proposal submission deadline by one week. | Impacts project management, resource availability, and potentially cost. | Likely disqualification. |
| Administrative Detail | Requiring a new, costly industry certification for all proposed personnel. | Correcting a typographical error in a boilerplate clause. | Imposes a new, significant cost and qualification barrier. | Disqualification. |

![A precision algorithmic core with layered rings on a reflective surface signifies high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives. It optimizes RFQ protocols for price discovery, channeling dark liquidity within a robust Prime RFQ for capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimized-for-precision.jpg)

![Polished metallic disks, resembling data platters, with a precise mechanical arm poised for high-fidelity execution. This embodies an institutional digital asset derivatives platform, optimizing RFQ protocol for efficient price discovery, managing market microstructure, and leveraging a Prime RFQ intelligence layer to minimize execution latency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-precision-execution-via-advanced-rfq-protocols-and-prime-os-intelligence-layer-for-optimal-market-microstructure.jpg)

## Strategy

Navigating the procedural nuance of an unacknowledged [RFP amendment](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-amendment/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) requires a distinct strategic calculus for both the issuing entity and the bidding organization. For the issuer, the primary directive is to maintain a procurement system that is fair, transparent, and defensible, while simultaneously achieving the best possible value. For the bidder, the objective is to secure the contract through a compliant and competitive offer, avoiding procedural pitfalls. The failure to acknowledge a non-material change exists at the intersection of these objectives, creating a scenario where rigid adherence to process can conflict with strategic goals.

![A sophisticated, multi-layered trading interface, embodying an Execution Management System EMS, showcases institutional-grade digital asset derivatives execution. Its sleek design implies high-fidelity execution and low-latency processing for RFQ protocols, enabling price discovery and managing multi-leg spreads with capital efficiency across diverse liquidity pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-platform-market-microstructure.jpg)

## Issuer Strategy a Defensible Decision Framework

When an issuer discovers that a bidder has failed to acknowledge a non-material amendment, the strategic response should be guided by a pre-defined analytical framework rather than an ad-hoc decision. This framework protects the integrity of the procurement and provides a defensible position in the event of a protest from a competing bidder. The core of this strategy is the consistent application of discretion.

The first step is an immediate and formal determination of materiality. This cannot be a casual assessment. The procurement officer should document precisely why the amendment is considered non-material, referencing the established tests ▴ its lack of impact on price, quality, quantity, delivery, or legal obligation.

This documentation is a critical shield against future challenges. For instance, if the unacknowledged amendment extended the bid acceptance period from 90 to 120 days, the officer would document that this change imposes no new burden on the bidder and has no bearing on the substance of the submitted proposal.

> A key strategic consideration for the issuer is the principle of competitive prejudice.

The central question becomes ▴ does waiving this minor informality give the non-acknowledging bidder an unfair advantage over its competitors? If the change is genuinely non-material, the answer is almost always no. All other bidders who acknowledged the change were not burdened by it, so allowing the silent bidder to remain in the competition creates no imbalance. Disqualifying the bidder, on the other hand, could prejudice the issuer’s own interests by artificially reducing competition, potentially leading to a higher price or lower quality outcome.

Therefore, the strategic default should be to waive the informality unless there is a compelling, documented reason to do otherwise. Such reasons might include a bidder’s repeated history of non-compliance or evidence that the failure was intentional and strategic, though proving the latter is exceptionally difficult.

![A sophisticated proprietary system module featuring precision-engineered components, symbolizing an institutional-grade Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives. Its intricate design represents market microstructure analysis, RFQ protocol integration, and high-fidelity execution capabilities, optimizing liquidity aggregation and price discovery for block trades within a multi-leg spread environment](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-proprietary-architecture-driving-high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-via-rfq-protocols-and-optimized-market-microstructure-dynamics.jpg)

## Bidder Strategy a System of Proactive Compliance

For bidders, the strategy is one of meticulous risk mitigation. The procurement landscape is inherently procedural, and treating any deviation from instruction as trivial is a strategic error. The most robust strategy is to build an internal system that treats every amendment as material until proven otherwise.

The cost of acknowledging an amendment is virtually zero; the potential cost of failing to do so, even if the lapse is ultimately waived, is significant. It can signal a lack of attention to detail to the evaluation committee and, in a worst-case scenario, lead to disqualification if the issuer takes a hardline stance or misjudges the materiality of the change.

An effective compliance system involves several layers:

- **Centralized Monitoring** ▴ A designated individual or team should be responsible for monitoring all procurement portals and communication channels for amendments. Responsibility should never be diffuse.

- **Immediate Acknowledgment Protocol** ▴ Upon receipt, every amendment should be formally acknowledged immediately, even before its contents are fully analyzed. This separates the administrative act of acknowledgment from the strategic act of incorporating the amendment’s substance into the proposal.

- **Integrated Proposal Checklist** ▴ Every proposal development process should include a final compliance checklist. A key item on this list must be a cross-verification of all issued amendments against the formal acknowledgments submitted with the bid. There are several valid ways to do this, including signing the amendment form itself (like the SF 33 in federal contracting), listing all acknowledged amendments in a cover letter, or using the designated section on the bid form.

- **[Constructive Acknowledgment](https://prime.greeks.live/area/constructive-acknowledgment/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) Awareness** ▴ While not a primary strategy, sophisticated bidders understand the concept of “constructive acknowledgment.” This occurs when the bid itself contains clear evidence that the bidder was aware of and incorporated the amendment, even without a formal acknowledgment statement. For example, if an amendment changes a line item’s unit of measure from “each” to “dozen,” and the bidder’s pricing sheet uses “dozen,” this demonstrates they have accepted the amendment’s terms. Relying on this is reactive, but it can be a saving grace in the event of an administrative error.

![A sleek, multi-segmented sphere embodies a Principal's operational framework for institutional digital asset derivatives. Its transparent 'intelligence layer' signifies high-fidelity execution and price discovery via RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocol-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-engine.jpg)

## The Competitive Landscape and Protest Risk

Every decision an issuer makes is observed by the other bidders. If an issuer waives a non-acknowledgment for one bidder, a competitor might see an opportunity for a [bid protest](https://prime.greeks.live/area/bid-protest/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), arguing that the waiver was improper and gave the other firm an unfair advantage. The strength of this protest hinges entirely on the question of materiality.

If the issuer has properly documented its determination that the change was non-material, a protest is very unlikely to succeed. The GAO and other oversight bodies consistently grant contracting officers the discretion to waive minor informalities.

This dynamic creates a delicate balance. The issuer wants to preserve competition but must do so in a way that is procedurally sound. A bidder who is disqualified for failing to acknowledge a genuinely non-material change may also have grounds for protest, arguing that the disqualification was arbitrary and unreasonable. The safest strategic path for the issuer is consistency.

If they have a policy or precedent for waiving such informalities, they should apply it evenly. If they choose to enforce a strict compliance regime, that too must be applied to all bidders without exception. The greatest risk comes from inconsistent application, which opens the door to credible claims of favoritism or bias.

![Geometric planes, light and dark, interlock around a central hexagonal core. This abstract visualization depicts an institutional-grade RFQ protocol engine, optimizing market microstructure for price discovery and high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives including Bitcoin options and multi-leg spreads within a Prime RFQ framework, ensuring atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-architecture.jpg)

![Metallic rods and translucent, layered panels against a dark backdrop. This abstract visualizes advanced RFQ protocols, enabling high-fidelity execution and price discovery across diverse liquidity pools for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-market-microstructure-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq.jpg)

## Execution

The execution of decisions surrounding RFP amendments is a matter of precise operational protocol. It moves beyond the conceptual understanding of materiality and the strategic balancing of risk into the tangible mechanics of communication, documentation, and legal defensibility. For both the entity issuing the solicitation and the organizations bidding on it, mastering these execution steps is fundamental to navigating the competitive procurement environment without succumbing to unforced procedural errors.

![An abstract digital interface features a dark circular screen with two luminous dots, one teal and one grey, symbolizing active and pending private quotation statuses within an RFQ protocol. Below, sharp parallel lines in black, beige, and grey delineate distinct liquidity pools and execution pathways for multi-leg spread strategies, reflecting market microstructure and high-fidelity execution for institutional grade digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-displaying-multi-leg-execution-status-and-optimal-liquidity-pathways.jpg)

## Issuer Execution Protocol for Amendment Management

For the procurement authority, the execution process begins the moment an amendment is deemed necessary. The entire lifecycle of the amendment must be managed with an eye toward potential future scrutiny.

- **Clear and Unambiguous Drafting** ▴ The amendment itself must be drafted with precision. It should clearly state what is being changed from the original RFP. Vague language invites misinterpretation and disputes over materiality. The best practice is to provide a summary of changes on the cover page of the amendment document.

- **Verifiable Distribution** ▴ The issuer must use a distribution method that provides a record of transmission to all prospective bidders. Modern e-procurement portals that log downloads and send automated notifications are the gold standard. Relying on email alone can be problematic if a bidder claims non-receipt. While the ultimate responsibility for obtaining documents often rests with the bidder, a robust and verifiable distribution process strengthens the issuer’s position.

- **Systematic Tracking of Acknowledgments** ▴ As proposals are received, the procurement team must execute a systematic check for amendment acknowledgments as part of the initial compliance screen. This should be a formal step in the evaluation workflow. A simple matrix listing all bidders and all amendments can be used to track compliance visually.

- **Formal Materiality Determination and Documentation** ▴ If a non-acknowledgment is found, the contracting officer must execute a formal, written determination of materiality. This document is the cornerstone of any subsequent decision. It should not be a simple checkbox. It must articulate the reasoning, citing the specific amendment and explaining why its impact on price, quality, quantity, or delivery is negligible. This becomes a key exhibit if a protest is filed.

- **Waiver or Disqualification Decision** ▴ With the materiality determination in hand, the officer executes the final decision. If the amendment is deemed non-material, the officer issues a formal waiver of the acknowledgment requirement. This waiver is documented in the contract file. If the amendment is deemed material, a disqualification letter is issued to the bidder. This letter should clearly state the reason for disqualification ▴ the failure to acknowledge a specific, material amendment.

![A dual-toned cylindrical component features a central transparent aperture revealing intricate metallic wiring. This signifies a core RFQ processing unit for Digital Asset Derivatives, enabling rapid Price Discovery and High-Fidelity Execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-core-best-execution-prime-os.jpg)

## Bidder Execution a Zero-Error Compliance Workflow

From the bidder’s perspective, execution is about building a workflow that makes failure to acknowledge an amendment a near impossibility. This is a function of internal process discipline.

The process begins with the formal designation of a single point of contact (SPOC) for each bid. This individual is responsible for the entire administrative lifecycle of the proposal. This SPOC must implement a rigorous monitoring schedule, checking procurement portals and other communication channels at least daily for any new documents or notifications related to the RFP.

> The submission of a bid is the final step in a long process; embedding compliance checks throughout prevents last-minute crises.

Upon discovering an amendment, the first action is to download and immediately forward it to the proposal manager and relevant subject matter experts. The second, equally critical action, is to execute the acknowledgment. This can be done by signing and returning the amendment form, or by logging it in a master checklist that will be used to generate the acknowledgment section of the proposal cover letter.

This two-track process ensures that the administrative requirement is met before the team even begins the work of incorporating the amendment’s substance into the bid. This proactive acknowledgment costs nothing and completely neutralizes the risk of disqualification on these grounds.

### Table 2 ▴ Bidder’s Amendment Management Workflow

| Phase | Action Item | Responsible Party | Key Objective | Verification Method |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Monitoring | Daily check of all official procurement channels for new documents. | Designated SPOC | Ensure immediate discovery of any issued amendments. | Daily log entry confirming “no new documents” or noting a new amendment. |
| Intake & Distribution | Download amendment and distribute to the full proposal team. | SPOC | Inform all relevant personnel of the change in requirements. | Internal email with read-receipts to proposal manager and SMEs. |
| Immediate Acknowledgment | Formally acknowledge the amendment per the RFP’s instructions (e.g. sign form, update cover letter draft). | SPOC | Neutralize the procedural risk of non-acknowledgment immediately. | Signed amendment form saved to project folder; master checklist updated. |
| Substantive Integration | Analyze the amendment’s impact on the technical, management, and cost volumes of the proposal. | Proposal Team (SMEs) | Ensure the bid is fully compliant with the amended RFP. | Updated proposal sections reflecting the new requirements. |
| Final Compliance Review | Cross-reference the final proposal against the master amendment checklist before submission. | Proposal Manager/SPOC | Final verification that all amendments have been both acknowledged and integrated. | Signed-off master checklist in the final submission package. |

![A beige spool feeds dark, reflective material into an advanced processing unit, illuminated by a vibrant blue light. This depicts high-fidelity execution of institutional digital asset derivatives through a Prime RFQ, enabling precise price discovery for aggregated RFQ inquiries within complex market microstructure, ensuring atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-prime-os-3.jpg)

## References

- “Failure to Acknowledge Solicitation Amendments.” WIFCON.com, 24 July 2014.

- Lieberman, Richard D. “FAILURE TO ACKNOWLEDGE A MATERIAL AMENDMENT-WHAT IS MATERIAL, AND HOW DO I MAKE NO MISTAKES?” Public Contracting Institute, 2016.

- U.S. Government Accountability Office. “Protest of Bid Rejection for Failure To Acknowledge Amendment.” B-208688, 8 Sept. 1982.

- Lieberman, Richard D. “How Is a Solicitation Amendment Constructively Acknowledged?” Public Contracting Institute, 2018.

- “Bid Protest decisions listed by Federal Acquisition Regulation.” WIFCON.com, various dates.

![Sleek, off-white cylindrical module with a dark blue recessed oval interface. This represents a Principal's Prime RFQ gateway for institutional digital asset derivatives, facilitating private quotation protocol for block trade execution, ensuring high-fidelity price discovery and capital efficiency through low-latency liquidity aggregation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-portal-optimal-institutional-digital-asset-execution.jpg)

## Reflection

The procedural mechanics of acknowledging RFP amendments, while seemingly administrative, offer a lens through which an organization can examine the resilience and sophistication of its entire business development apparatus. The handling of a non-material change is a microcosm of a larger operational philosophy. It reveals the degree to which an organization has engineered its processes to manage complexity, mitigate unforced errors, and maintain focus on the strategic objective of winning contracts.

An organization that consistently struggles with such procedural details may find it useful to ask deeper questions. Is information siloed? Are responsibilities diffuse?

Is the pursuit of new business viewed as a series of disconnected sprints rather than the output of a coherent, well-oiled system? The failure to acknowledge a minor amendment is rarely a singular event; it is often a symptom of systemic friction within the operational framework.

Conversely, an organization with a robust, zero-error [compliance workflow](https://prime.greeks.live/area/compliance-workflow/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) demonstrates more than just attention to detail. It showcases an institutional capacity for managing risk and complexity. This capacity is a strategic asset. It frees up cognitive and material resources to be deployed where they matter most ▴ crafting a superior technical solution and a more competitive pricing structure.

The knowledge gained from understanding these procurement protocols is a component of a larger intelligence system, one that transforms administrative compliance from a burdensome chore into a source of competitive advantage. The ultimate goal is an operational framework so sound that procedural questions become background noise, allowing the full force of the organization’s talent to be focused on the substantive challenge of the bid itself.

![Abstract clear and teal geometric forms, including a central lens, intersect a reflective metallic surface on black. This embodies market microstructure precision, algorithmic trading for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-prime-os.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/procurement-integrity/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sophisticated apparatus, potentially a price discovery or volatility surface calibration tool. A blue needle with sphere and clamp symbolizes high-fidelity execution pathways and RFQ protocol integration within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocol-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

## Procurement Integrity

Meaning ▴ Procurement Integrity defines the verifiable, auditable, and cryptographically secured framework governing the acquisition, validation, and integration of all external systems, platforms, and services critical to an institutional digital asset derivatives trading operation. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/non-material-change/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sophisticated, illuminated device representing an Institutional Grade Prime RFQ for Digital Asset Derivatives. Its glowing interface indicates active RFQ protocol execution, displaying high-fidelity execution status and price discovery for block trades](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-rfq-engine-for-digital-asset-derivatives-best-execution-1.jpg)

## Non-Material Change

Meaning ▴ A non-material change denotes an alteration to a system or financial instrument that does not impact its core economic terms, risk profile, or fundamental operational characteristics. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/federal-acquisition-regulation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Intersecting digital architecture with glowing conduits symbolizes Principal's operational framework. An RFQ engine ensures high-fidelity execution of Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives, facilitating block trades, multi-leg spreads](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Federal Acquisition Regulation

Meaning ▴ The Federal Acquisition Regulation, or FAR, constitutes the principal set of rules governing the acquisition process for all executive agencies of the United States federal government. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/minor-informality/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek spherical device with a central teal-glowing display, embodying an Institutional Digital Asset RFQ intelligence layer. Its robust design signifies a Prime RFQ for high-fidelity execution, enabling precise price discovery and optimal liquidity aggregation across complex market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-microstructure-price-discovery-prime-os.jpg)

## Minor Informality

Meaning ▴ Minor Informality designates a controlled, permissible deviation from a formally specified protocol or operational standard within a digital asset derivatives system, operating strictly within predefined tolerance thresholds to maintain overall system integrity and functional continuity. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-role-of-a-designated-publishing-entity-in-post-trade-reporting/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A stylized depiction of institutional-grade digital asset derivatives RFQ execution. A central glowing liquidity pool for price discovery is precisely pierced by an algorithmic trading path, symbolizing high-fidelity execution and slippage minimization within market microstructure via a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-high-fidelity-execution-1.jpg)

## Issuing Entity

A Designated Publishing Entity centralizes and simplifies OTC trade reporting through an Approved Publication Arrangement under MiFIR. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-amendment/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Visualizing a complex Institutional RFQ ecosystem, angular forms represent multi-leg spread execution pathways and dark liquidity integration. A sharp, precise point symbolizes high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives, highlighting atomic settlement within a Prime RFQ framework](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution-1.jpg)

## Rfp Amendment

Meaning ▴ A formal, documented modification or addition to an existing Request for Proposal (RFP), issued by the requesting entity to all prospective respondents. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/constructive-acknowledgment/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precision-engineered institutional digital asset derivatives execution system cutaway. The teal Prime RFQ casing reveals intricate market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-rfq-protocol-core-engine.jpg)

## Constructive Acknowledgment

Meaning ▴ Constructive Acknowledgment signifies a system's implicit confirmation that a specific state or event has occurred, based solely on processing predefined conditions and internal data. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/bid-protest/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, spherical white and blue module featuring a central black aperture and teal lens, representing the core Intelligence Layer for Institutional Trading in Digital Asset Derivatives. It visualizes High-Fidelity Execution within an RFQ protocol, enabling precise Price Discovery and optimizing the Principal's Operational Framework for Crypto Derivatives OS](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-lens-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution.jpg)

## Bid Protest

Meaning ▴ A Bid Protest represents a formal, auditable mechanism within an institutional digital asset derivatives trading framework, enabling a principal to systematically challenge the integrity or outcome of a competitive pricing event. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/compliance-workflow/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract geometric forms, including overlapping planes and central spherical nodes, visually represent a sophisticated institutional digital asset derivatives trading ecosystem. It depicts complex multi-leg spread execution, dynamic RFQ protocol liquidity aggregation, and high-fidelity algorithmic trading within a Prime RFQ framework, ensuring optimal price discovery and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-liquidity-aggregation-market-microstructure-high-fidelity-execution-alpha-generation-prime-os-capital-efficiency.jpg)

## Compliance Workflow

Meaning ▴ A Compliance Workflow defines the automated and systematic processes engineered to ensure that all transactional activities within a digital asset trading system strictly adhere to pre-defined regulatory mandates, internal risk parameters, and institutional policies. </a>

**Tags:** [Solicitation Amendment](https://options.greeks.live/area/solicitation-amendment/), [Materiality Threshold](https://options.greeks.live/area/materiality-threshold/), [RFP Amendment](https://options.greeks.live/area/rfp-amendment/), [Procurement Integrity](https://options.greeks.live/area/procurement-integrity/), [Federal Acquisition Regulation](https://options.greeks.live/area/federal-acquisition-regulation/), [Constructive Acknowledgment](https://options.greeks.live/area/constructive-acknowledgment/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [How Does an Rfp Amendment Affect the Original Proposal Deadline?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-an-rfp-amendment-affect-the-original-proposal-deadline/)
![A central glowing core within metallic structures symbolizes an Institutional Grade RFQ engine. This Intelligence Layer enables optimal Price Discovery and High-Fidelity Execution for Digital Asset Derivatives, streamlining Block Trade and Multi-Leg Spread Atomic Settlement.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-microstructure-core.jpg)

An RFP amendment recalibrates the procurement, with its materiality dictating the necessity and length of a proposal deadline extension to ensure fair competition.

- 
### [What Are the Legal Consequences of Failing to Notify All Bidders of a Change in Rfp Criteria?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-legal-consequences-of-failing-to-notify-all-bidders-of-a-change-in-rfp-criteria/)
![A precision internal mechanism for 'Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives' 'Prime RFQ'. White casing holds dark blue 'algorithmic trading' logic and a teal 'multi-leg spread' module. A luminous sphere aids 'price discovery' and 'implied volatility' for 'high-fidelity execution' via 'RFQ' protocols.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-engine-high-fidelity-execution-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

Failing to notify bidders of RFP changes breaches the implied contract of fairness, risking contract nullification and financial damages.

- 
### [How Does the Cumulative Effect of Several Minor Amendments Impact an Rfp’s Materiality?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-cumulative-effect-of-several-minor-amendments-impact-an-rfps-materiality/)
![The image features layered structural elements, representing diverse liquidity pools and market segments within a Principal's operational framework. A sharp, reflective plane intersects, symbolizing high-fidelity execution and price discovery via private quotation protocols for institutional digital asset derivatives, emphasizing atomic settlement nodes.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/systemic-interplay-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-via-advanced-rfq-protocols.jpg)

The cumulative effect of minor RFP amendments can trigger a systemic failure, transforming the procurement into a materially different contract that invalidates the original competition.

- 
### [What Defines a Material Change in an Rfp and What Are Its Immediate Consequences?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-defines-a-material-change-in-an-rfp-and-what-are-its-immediate-consequences/)
![A central glowing blue mechanism with a precision reticle is encased by dark metallic panels. This symbolizes an institutional-grade Principal's operational framework for high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives. It embodies RFQ processing, enabling price discovery within a deep liquidity pool, optimizing market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-core-enabling-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution.jpg)

A material change in an RFP is a core alteration of terms that compels a procedural reset to ensure competitive fairness and legal integrity.

- 
### [What Constitutes a Reasonable Basis for an Agency to Cancel Part of an Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-constitutes-a-reasonable-basis-for-an-agency-to-cancel-part-of-an-rfp/)
![A polished, two-toned surface, representing a Principal's proprietary liquidity pool for digital asset derivatives, underlies a teal, domed intelligence layer. This visualizes RFQ protocol dynamism, enabling high-fidelity execution and price discovery for Bitcoin options and Ethereum futures.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-platform-intelligence-layer.jpg)

An agency's reasonable basis for partial RFP cancellation rests on a documented, material change in its requirements.

- 
### [What Are the Primary Legal Risks Associated with Improperly Amending an Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-legal-risks-associated-with-improperly-amending-an-rfp/)
![Abstract bisected spheres, reflective grey and textured teal, forming an infinity, symbolize institutional digital asset derivatives. Grey represents high-fidelity execution and market microstructure teal, deep liquidity pools and volatility surface data. This visualizes optimized RFQ protocols for multi-leg spread and atomic settlement within a Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocols-for-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

Improper RFP amendments create legal risks by breaching fairness protocols, exposing the entity to bid protests and lawsuits.

- 
### [Can You Change Evaluation Criteria after an Rfp Has Been Issued?](https://options.greeks.live/question/can-you-change-evaluation-criteria-after-an-rfp-has-been-issued/)
![Robust metallic structures, symbolizing institutional grade digital asset derivatives infrastructure, intersect. Transparent blue-green planes represent algorithmic trading and high-fidelity execution for multi-leg spreads. A blurred background ring suggests dark liquidity and market microstructure for RFQ protocols.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-microstructure-1.jpg)

Modifying RFP evaluation criteria post-issuance is a permissible but high-risk action requiring a formal, transparent amendment protocol.

- 
### [Under What Specific Circumstances Would Cancelling and Reissuing an Rfp Be Strategically Better than Amending It?](https://options.greeks.live/question/under-what-specific-circumstances-would-cancelling-and-reissuing-an-rfp-be-strategically-better-than-amending-it/)
![A polished blue sphere representing a digital asset derivative rests on a metallic ring, symbolizing market microstructure and RFQ protocols, supported by a foundational beige sphere, an institutional liquidity pool. A smaller blue sphere floats above, denoting atomic settlement or a private quotation within a Principal's Prime RFQ for high-fidelity execution.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-market-microstructure-and-rfq-protocols.jpg)

Canceling and reissuing an RFP is strategically superior when material changes to scope or evaluation render the original process fundamentally unfair or obsolete.

- 
### [What Are the Primary Legal Grounds for a Bid Protest Following an Rfp Amendment?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-legal-grounds-for-a-bid-protest-following-an-rfp-amendment/)
![A sleek pen hovers over a luminous circular structure with teal internal components, symbolizing precise RFQ initiation. This represents high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives, optimizing market microstructure and achieving atomic settlement within a Prime RFQ liquidity pool.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/optimizing-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-through-prime-os-precision.jpg)

A bid protest following an RFP amendment is a legal challenge asserting the change has created an unfair, ambiguous, or restrictive competitive environment.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "Can a Bidder Be Disqualified for Failing to Acknowledge a Non-Material Change to an Rfp?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/can-a-bidder-be-disqualified-for-failing-to-acknowledge-a-non-material-change-to-an-rfp/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/can-a-bidder-be-disqualified-for-failing-to-acknowledge-a-non-material-change-to-an-rfp/"
    },
    "headline": "Can a Bidder Be Disqualified for Failing to Acknowledge a Non-Material Change to an Rfp? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "A bidder's disqualification for failing to acknowledge a non-material RFP change is discretionary and unlikely, as the focus is on substantive compliance over procedural formality. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/can-a-bidder-be-disqualified-for-failing-to-acknowledge-a-non-material-change-to-an-rfp/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-10T04:06:58+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-08-10T04:07:04+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-microstructure-price-discovery-prime-os.jpg",
        "caption": "This advanced spherical intelligence unit, featuring a central teal-glowing display and multi-material construction, represents the core of a next-generation Prime RFQ. It is engineered for institutional digital asset derivatives, facilitating high-fidelity RFQ execution, robust block trade processing, and real-time price discovery. The system's design reflects sophisticated market microstructure analytics, enabling optimal capital efficiency, mitigating counterparty risk, and ensuring best execution across diverse liquidity pools."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Bid Protest",
        "Bidder Disqualification",
        "Compliance Workflow",
        "Constructive Acknowledgment",
        "Federal Acquisition Regulation",
        "Materiality Threshold",
        "Minor Informality",
        "Non-Material Change",
        "Procurement Integrity",
        "RFP Amendment",
        "Solicitation Amendment"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/can-a-bidder-be-disqualified-for-failing-to-acknowledge-a-non-material-change-to-an-rfp/
