# Can a Firm Use a Single Vendor for Both Ems and Cat Reporting Functions? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-03
**Categories:** Question

---

![An intricate, transparent cylindrical system depicts a sophisticated RFQ protocol for digital asset derivatives. Internal glowing elements signify high-fidelity execution and algorithmic trading](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-protocol-architecture.jpg)

![A Principal's RFQ engine core unit, featuring distinct algorithmic matching probes for high-fidelity execution and liquidity aggregation. This price discovery mechanism leverages private quotation pathways, optimizing crypto derivatives OS operations for atomic settlement within its systemic architecture](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/principals-rfq-engine-driving-optimal-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

## Concept

The decision to unify [Execution Management System](https://prime.greeks.live/area/execution-management-system/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (EMS) functions and [Consolidated Audit Trail](https://prime.greeks.live/area/consolidated-audit-trail/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (CAT) reporting under a single vendor represents a fundamental architectural choice about a firm’s operational core. This is a question of systemic integrity. At its heart, it is an inquiry into the optimal structure for managing the flow of data from order inception to regulatory submission. The modern trading apparatus is an ecosystem of interconnected modules.

An [EMS](https://prime.greeks.live/area/ems/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is the locus of execution intelligence, the environment where a portfolio manager’s strategy is translated into actionable orders. It is a system of action, designed for price discovery, risk management, and algorithmic execution. Its primary function is to achieve the best possible outcome for a trade in the live market.

[CAT reporting](https://prime.greeks.live/area/cat-reporting/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), conversely, is a system of record. It is a regulatory mandate designed to provide a comprehensive, time-sequenced [audit trail](https://prime.greeks.live/area/audit-trail/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) of the entire lifecycle of an order, from origination through routing, modification, and final execution or cancellation. It serves the objectives of market surveillance and regulatory oversight.

The data it requires is granular, time-sensitive, and subject to stringent accuracy standards. The two systems, therefore, serve different masters ▴ one serves the firm’s pursuit of alpha and execution quality, while the other serves the regulator’s need for market transparency.

> A firm’s selection of a vendor for its EMS and CAT reporting functions establishes the foundational architecture for its trading data and regulatory compliance mechanisms.

The convergence of these two functions within a single vendor platform presents a compelling proposition of seamless data transference. In this integrated model, every reportable event generated within the EMS ▴ an order placement, a modification, a route to a specific venue ▴ can theoretically be captured and formatted for CAT submission with minimal friction. The data lineage is direct. An order created in the EMS becomes the source record for the corresponding CAT reportable event.

This inherent linkage promises to resolve significant operational challenges related to data reconciliation and synchronization. When separate vendors manage these functions, the firm must construct and maintain a robust internal process to ensure that the data from the EMS is accurately transmitted, translated, and reported by the CAT vendor. Discrepancies in timestamps, identifiers, or event sequencing can introduce reporting errors, which carry regulatory risk.

A unified architecture can present a streamlined command structure for a firm’s trading and compliance operations. The technical and operational support for both execution and reporting resides with a single counterparty. This simplifies [vendor management](https://prime.greeks.live/area/vendor-management/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), potentially reduces technology overhead, and creates a single point of accountability for a critical data workflow. The firm’s operational teams can develop a deep, holistic understanding of one system’s logic and data structures, fostering expertise and efficiency.

The potential for a cohesive data model, where identifiers and event definitions are consistent across both execution and reporting, is a powerful architectural advantage. This alignment can significantly reduce the complexity and cost associated with data mapping and translation between disparate systems.

![Abstractly depicting an Institutional Grade Crypto Derivatives OS component. Its robust structure and metallic interface signify precise Market Microstructure for High-Fidelity Execution of RFQ Protocol and Block Trade orders](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principals-integrated-crypto-derivatives-rfq-protocol-architecture.jpg)

![The abstract image features angular, parallel metallic and colored planes, suggesting structured market microstructure for digital asset derivatives. A spherical element represents a block trade or RFQ protocol inquiry, reflecting dynamic implied volatility and price discovery within a dark pool](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/optimized-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-framework-ensuring-principal-best-execution-and-latent-liquidity-capture.jpg)

## Strategy

Strategically evaluating the vendor architecture for EMS and CAT reporting requires a firm to weigh the benefits of a unified system against the advantages of a diversified, best-of-breed approach. The decision extends beyond mere operational convenience; it shapes the firm’s risk posture, technological agility, and long-term cost structure. The choice is between two distinct philosophical models for building a firm’s operational infrastructure. One model prioritizes integration and data consistency, while the other prioritizes specialization and flexibility.

![A sophisticated proprietary system module featuring precision-engineered components, symbolizing an institutional-grade Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives. Its intricate design represents market microstructure analysis, RFQ protocol integration, and high-fidelity execution capabilities, optimizing liquidity aggregation and price discovery for block trades within a multi-leg spread environment](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-proprietary-architecture-driving-high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-via-rfq-protocols-and-optimized-market-microstructure-dynamics.jpg)

## What Is the Core Strategic Tradeoff?

The central strategic consideration is the balance between the operational efficiencies of a single-vendor solution and the risk mitigation and functional depth offered by a multi-vendor ecosystem. A single-vendor approach creates a tightly coupled system. The [data flow](https://prime.greeks.live/area/data-flow/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) from trade execution to regulatory reporting is managed within a closed loop, governed by a single technology provider. This can produce significant advantages in terms of [data integrity](https://prime.greeks.live/area/data-integrity/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) and reporting timeliness.

The risk of data loss or misinterpretation during handoffs between systems is structurally minimized. The firm benefits from a unified data dictionary and a consistent timestamping methodology, which are critical for accurate CAT reporting. The responsibility for maintaining compliance with evolving CAT reporting rules falls to one partner, simplifying the firm’s oversight obligations.

A multi-vendor strategy, conversely, builds a loosely coupled system. The firm selects a specialized EMS provider based on its execution capabilities ▴ algorithmic sophistication, market access, and user interface ▴ and a separate, specialized CAT reporting vendor based on its regulatory expertise, reporting accuracy, and error management tools. This approach allows the firm to procure the most advanced solution for each distinct function. It avoids a situation where a firm might have to compromise on EMS functionality to gain the convenience of an integrated CAT reporting module, or vice versa.

This diversification also mitigates vendor concentration risk. A firm that relies on a single provider for both critical functions is more exposed to the consequences of that vendor’s potential business failure, technological obsolescence, or unfavorable contract renegotiations.

> Choosing a vendor model for EMS and CAT reporting is a strategic decision that balances the pursuit of operational efficiency against the imperative of risk diversification and functional specialization.

![Three interconnected units depict a Prime RFQ for institutional digital asset derivatives. The glowing blue layer signifies real-time RFQ execution and liquidity aggregation, ensuring high-fidelity execution across market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-liquidity-aggregation-os.jpg)

## Comparative Analysis of Vendor Models

The following table provides a structured comparison of the strategic implications of a single-vendor versus a multi-vendor approach for EMS and CAT reporting functions. This framework allows a firm to assess the competing priorities and align its choice with its specific business model, risk tolerance, and technological maturity.

### Table 1 ▴ Strategic Comparison of Vendor Models

| Strategic Factor | Single-Vendor Model | Multi-Vendor Model |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Data Integrity | Higher inherent consistency due to a unified data model. Lower risk of reconciliation errors between execution and reporting systems. | Requires robust internal controls and data reconciliation processes. Higher risk of discrepancies in timestamps, identifiers, or event interpretation. |
| Operational Efficiency | Streamlined workflow with a single point of contact for support and issue resolution. Simplified vendor management and oversight. | Increased complexity in managing multiple vendor relationships, contracts, and service-level agreements. Requires internal resources to manage the integration layer. |
| Functional Specialization | Potential for compromise. The vendor’s core competency may be in either EMS or regulatory reporting, with the other function being a less developed offering. | Allows the firm to select best-of-breed providers for both execution and CAT reporting, maximizing functional depth in each area. |
| Vendor Risk | Higher concentration risk. The firm is heavily reliant on the financial stability, technological performance, and business continuity of a single provider. | Diversified risk profile. The failure of one vendor does not necessarily cripple both execution and reporting capabilities. |
| Cost Structure | Potential for bundled pricing and lower overall contract value. Predictable, unified cost base. | May involve higher total licensing fees. Additional internal costs associated with integration, data management, and reconciliation. |
| Technological Agility | Lower agility. The firm is locked into the vendor’s development roadmap and technology stack. Migrating to a new system is a significant undertaking. | Higher agility. The firm can replace one component (e.g. the CAT reporting solution) without disrupting the other (the EMS), allowing for more rapid adoption of new technologies. |

![Two sleek, abstract forms, one dark, one light, are precisely stacked, symbolizing a multi-layered institutional trading system. This embodies sophisticated RFQ protocols, high-fidelity execution, and optimal liquidity aggregation for digital asset derivatives, ensuring robust market microstructure and capital efficiency within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-digital-asset-derivatives-platform-architecture-high-fidelity-execution-protocols-and-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## The Role of Internal Capabilities

A firm’s internal technological and operational capabilities are a determining factor in the success of its chosen strategy. A firm with limited internal IT resources may find the simplicity of a single-vendor solution more manageable. The vendor assumes a greater share of the responsibility for system integration and data management. Conversely, a firm with a sophisticated internal technology team may be well-equipped to manage the complexities of a multi-vendor environment.

Such a firm can build and maintain the necessary data bridges, reconciliation engines, and oversight tools to ensure the integrity of its reporting process. This internal expertise allows the firm to harness the benefits of specialized vendors without succumbing to the operational risks of a fragmented data landscape.

- **For a single-vendor strategy to succeed**, the firm must conduct rigorous due diligence on the provider’s capabilities in both EMS and CAT reporting. It must validate that the integrated solution does not involve a significant compromise in the functionality of either component.

- **For a multi-vendor strategy to succeed**, the firm must invest in its internal data governance framework. This includes establishing a “golden source” for all trade-related data, implementing automated reconciliation processes, and defining clear procedures for investigating and resolving data discrepancies. The firm must also ensure that all vendors use a consistent [Firm Designated ID](https://prime.greeks.live/area/firm-designated-id/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) ([FDID](https://prime.greeks.live/area/fdid/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)) for each trading account to maintain data linkage across systems.

![A precision algorithmic core with layered rings on a reflective surface signifies high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives. It optimizes RFQ protocols for price discovery, channeling dark liquidity within a robust Prime RFQ for capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimized-for-precision.jpg)

![A stacked, multi-colored modular system representing an institutional digital asset derivatives platform. The top unit facilitates RFQ protocol initiation and dynamic price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine-15.jpg)

## Execution

The execution of a vendor strategy for EMS and CAT reporting is a matter of precise operational engineering. Whether a firm chooses a single-vendor or [multi-vendor model](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-differences-between-backtesting-a-slippage-model-and-a-profitability-model/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), the ultimate objective is the same ▴ to ensure the timely, complete, and accurate submission of all reportable events to the [Consolidated Audit](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-challenges-in-implementing-the-consolidated-audit-trail/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) Trail. The firm retains the regulatory obligation for its CAT reporting, even when it delegates the reporting function to a vendor. This principle of retained liability dictates that the firm must implement a robust framework of controls, oversight, and validation, regardless of its vendor architecture.

![A sophisticated control panel, featuring concentric blue and white segments with two teal oval buttons. This embodies an institutional RFQ Protocol interface, facilitating High-Fidelity Execution for Private Quotation and Aggregated Inquiry](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-rfq-protocol-interface-for-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

## How Is the Data Flow Architected?

The architectural design of the data flow from order initiation to CAT submission is the most critical element of execution. In a single-vendor model, this flow is largely contained within the vendor’s technology stack. In a multi-vendor model, the firm must architect the data flow across system boundaries. The following table outlines the key stages of this data flow and the operational considerations at each step.

### Table 2 ▴ Data Flow From EMS To CAT Submission

| Stage | Description | Single-Vendor Consideration | Multi-Vendor Consideration |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1. Event Generation | A reportable event occurs within the EMS (e.g. new order, route, modification, cancellation). The event is captured with a precise timestamp. | The event and its attributes are captured natively within the vendor’s system, creating a single source record for both execution and reporting. | The event data must be extracted from the EMS in a structured format (e.g. FIX message log, database extract) for transmission to the CAT vendor. |
| 2. Data Enrichment | The event data is enriched with additional information required for CAT reporting, such as the Firm Designated ID (FDID) and customer account information. | Enrichment typically occurs within the unified platform, drawing from a central repository of customer and account data. | Enrichment may occur at the firm level before data is sent to the CAT vendor, or by the CAT vendor itself, requiring a separate feed of account information. |
| 3. Translation and Formatting | The enriched event data is translated into the specific record layout required by the CAT technical specifications. | The vendor is solely responsible for maintaining its system’s alignment with the latest CAT specifications. | The CAT vendor is responsible for translation, but the firm must ensure it is providing the vendor with all necessary data fields in a compatible format. |
| 4. Submission | The formatted CAT report is submitted to the central repository. | The vendor manages the submission process and provides the firm with confirmation and feedback files. | The CAT vendor manages the submission, but the firm must have a process to receive and review the submission feedback. |
| 5. Error Correction | The firm receives feedback from the CAT system on any rejected or erroneous records and must correct and resubmit them within the required timeframe (T+3). | Error management is handled through the vendor’s platform. The firm’s operational staff uses the vendor’s tools to investigate and correct errors. | Requires a clear definition of roles. The CAT vendor may identify the error, but the firm may need to investigate the root cause within its own systems or the EMS. |

![Precision-engineered institutional-grade Prime RFQ modules connect via intricate hardware, embodying robust RFQ protocols for digital asset derivatives. This underlying market microstructure enables high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement, optimizing capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/precision-engineered-prime-os-modules-enabling-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-for-best-execution.jpg)

## Implementing a Control Framework

A rigorous control framework is essential to ensure the integrity of the CAT reporting process. This framework should be designed to prevent, detect, and correct errors in the data flow. The firm’s responsibility for oversight cannot be fully outsourced.

- **Data Reconciliation** ▴ The firm must implement a process to reconcile the data submitted to CAT with its own internal records. This involves comparing the CAT reports generated by the vendor with the firm’s own order and execution logs from the EMS. A daily reconciliation process is a critical control for identifying missing or inaccurate reports.

- **Exception Management** ▴ A formal workflow for managing exceptions and errors is required. This process should clearly define the roles and responsibilities of the firm’s staff and the vendor(s). It must ensure that all errors are investigated, resolved, and resubmitted within the T+3 correction window.

- **Vendor Oversight** ▴ The firm must conduct ongoing oversight of its vendor(s). This includes regular performance reviews, audits of the vendor’s controls, and validation of the vendor’s adherence to the CAT technical specifications. The firm should have a clear understanding of the vendor’s business continuity and disaster recovery plans.

The choice between a single-vendor and a multi-vendor model is ultimately a decision about where the firm wishes to locate complexity. A single-vendor model simplifies the external vendor landscape but requires the firm to place a high degree of trust in one provider’s integrated capabilities. A multi-vendor model introduces external complexity in the form of multiple relationships and system integrations, but it provides the firm with greater control over the selection of individual components and diversifies its [operational risk](https://prime.greeks.live/area/operational-risk/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). In both scenarios, the firm’s internal commitment to data governance, reconciliation, and oversight is the ultimate determinant of success.

![An abstract, multi-component digital infrastructure with a central lens and circuit patterns, embodying an Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives platform. This Prime RFQ enables High-Fidelity Execution via RFQ Protocol, optimizing Market Microstructure for Algorithmic Trading, Price Discovery, and Multi-Leg Spread](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-grade-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-platform-powering-high-fidelity-execution-via-advanced-rfq-protocol-prime-os-intelligence-layer.jpg)

## References

- Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association. “Firm’s Guide to the Consolidated Audit Trail (CAT).” SIFMA, 2019.

- CAT NMS, LLC. “Consolidated Audit Trail (CAT) Industry Member Reporting Scenarios.” CATNMSplan.com, 2020.

- FINRA. “FINRA Rule 6800 Series (Consolidated Audit Trail Compliance Rule).” Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, 2020.

- U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. “Rule 613 of Regulation NMS (Consolidated Audit Trail).” SEC.gov, 2012.

- Harris, Larry. “Trading and Exchanges ▴ Market Microstructure for Practitioners.” Oxford University Press, 2003.

![A precisely engineered system features layered grey and beige plates, representing distinct liquidity pools or market segments, connected by a central dark blue RFQ protocol hub. Transparent teal bars, symbolizing multi-leg options spreads or algorithmic trading pathways, intersect through this core, facilitating price discovery and high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives via an institutional-grade Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-facilitating-high-fidelity-multi-leg-options-spread-execution-best-price-discovery-and-latent-liquidity-access-for-prime-brokerage.jpg)

## Reflection

The architectural decision regarding EMS and CAT reporting vendors is a reflection of a firm’s core operational philosophy. It compels a direct confrontation with how the firm defines control, manages risk, and builds for the future. The framework you have explored here provides the mechanical and strategic inputs for this decision. The ultimate choice, however, is a component of a much larger system of intelligence ▴ your firm’s unique operational identity.

How does this specific architectural choice resonate with your broader strategy for technology adoption, risk management, and regulatory engagement? Viewing this decision not as an isolated procurement exercise, but as an integral part of your firm’s operational blueprint, unlocks its true strategic potential.

![A precise geometric prism reflects on a dark, structured surface, symbolizing institutional digital asset derivatives market microstructure. This visualizes block trade execution and price discovery for multi-leg spreads via RFQ protocols, ensuring high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency within Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-precision-execution.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/execution-management-system/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract geometric forms illustrate an Execution Management System EMS. Two distinct liquidity pools, representing Bitcoin Options and Ethereum Futures, facilitate RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution-6.jpg)

## Execution Management System

Meaning ▴ An Execution Management System (EMS) is a specialized software application engineered to facilitate and optimize the electronic execution of financial trades across diverse venues and asset classes. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/consolidated-audit-trail/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sophisticated metallic instrument, a precision gauge, indicates a calibrated reading, essential for RFQ protocol execution. Its intricate scales symbolize price discovery and high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-platform.jpg)

## Consolidated Audit Trail

Meaning ▴ The Consolidated Audit Trail (CAT) is a comprehensive, centralized database designed to capture and track every order, quote, and trade across US equity and options markets. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/ems/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Central, interlocked mechanical structures symbolize a sophisticated Crypto Derivatives OS driving institutional RFQ protocol. Surrounding blades represent diverse liquidity pools and multi-leg spread components](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-architecture-optimizing-high-fidelity-execution-across-diverse-liquidity-pools.jpg)

## Ems

Meaning ▴ An Execution Management System (EMS) is a specialized software application that provides a consolidated interface for institutional traders to manage and execute orders across multiple trading venues and asset classes. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/cat-reporting/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Intersecting transparent and opaque geometric planes, symbolizing the intricate market microstructure of institutional digital asset derivatives. Visualizes high-fidelity execution and price discovery via RFQ protocols, demonstrating multi-leg spread strategies and dark liquidity for capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-market-microstructure-architecture.jpg)

## Cat Reporting

Meaning ▴ CAT Reporting, or Consolidated Audit Trail Reporting, mandates the comprehensive capture and reporting of all order and trade events across US equity and and options markets. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/audit-trail/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![The image displays a sleek, intersecting mechanism atop a foundational blue sphere. It represents the intricate market microstructure of institutional digital asset derivatives trading, facilitating RFQ protocols for block trades](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-rfq-execution.jpg)

## Audit Trail

Meaning ▴ An Audit Trail is a chronological, immutable record of system activities, operations, or transactions within a digital environment, detailing event sequence, user identification, timestamps, and specific actions. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/vendor-management/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Precision-engineered metallic tracks house a textured block with a central threaded aperture. This visualizes a core RFQ execution component within an institutional market microstructure, enabling private quotation for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-framework-precision-microstructure-component.jpg)

## Vendor Management

Meaning ▴ Vendor Management defines the structured discipline governing the selection, onboarding, performance monitoring, and strategic relationship optimization of third-party service providers crucial to an institution's operational integrity, particularly within the high-velocity environment of institutional digital asset derivatives trading. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/data-integrity/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract depiction of an advanced institutional trading system, featuring a prominent sensor for real-time price discovery and an intelligence layer. Visible circuitry signifies algorithmic trading capabilities, low-latency execution, and robust FIX protocol integration for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-high-fidelity-rfq-protocols.jpg)

## Data Integrity

Meaning ▴ Data Integrity ensures the accuracy, consistency, and reliability of data throughout its lifecycle. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/data-flow/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Sleek metallic system component with intersecting translucent fins, symbolizing multi-leg spread execution for institutional grade digital asset derivatives. It enables high-fidelity execution and price discovery via RFQ protocols, optimizing market microstructure and gamma exposure for capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-system-rfq-protocols.jpg)

## Data Flow

Meaning ▴ Data Flow defines the structured, directional movement of information within and between interconnected systems, critical for real-time operational awareness in institutional digital asset derivatives. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/firm-designated-id/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Central nexus with radiating arms symbolizes a Principal's sophisticated Execution Management System EMS. Segmented areas depict diverse liquidity pools and dark pools, enabling precise price discovery for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-rfq-liquidity-orchestration.jpg)

## Firm Designated Id

Meaning ▴ The Firm Designated ID represents a unique alphanumeric identifier assigned by an executing institution to each order or trade initiated within its proprietary systems. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/fdid/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, metallic algorithmic trading component with a central circular mechanism rests on angular, multi-colored reflective surfaces, symbolizing sophisticated RFQ protocols, aggregated liquidity, and high-fidelity execution within institutional digital asset derivatives market microstructure. This represents the intelligence layer of a Prime RFQ for optimal price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-system-architecture-for-optimal-price-discovery-and-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Fdid

Meaning ▴ The FDID, or Firm Derivative Identifier, represents a unique, system-generated code assigned to a specific derivative contract or a defined class of derivative instruments within an institutional trading framework. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-challenges-in-implementing-the-consolidated-audit-trail/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A spherical Liquidity Pool is bisected by a metallic diagonal bar, symbolizing an RFQ Protocol and its Market Microstructure. Imperfections on the bar represent Slippage challenges in High-Fidelity Execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-optimization-within-principals-market-microstructure-framework.jpg)

## Consolidated Audit

The primary challenge of the Consolidated Audit Trail is architecting a unified data system from fragmented, legacy infrastructure. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-differences-between-backtesting-a-slippage-model-and-a-profitability-model/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sophisticated metallic mechanism, split into distinct operational segments, represents the core of a Prime RFQ for institutional digital asset derivatives. Its central gears symbolize high-fidelity execution within RFQ protocols, facilitating price discovery and atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-rfq-engine-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trading.jpg)

## Multi-Vendor Model

A profitability model tests a strategy's theoretical alpha; a slippage model tests its practical viability against market friction. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/operational-risk/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precise stack of multi-layered circular components visually representing a sophisticated Principal Digital Asset RFQ framework. Each distinct layer signifies a critical component within market microstructure for high-fidelity execution of institutional digital asset derivatives, embodying liquidity aggregation across dark pools, enabling private quotation and atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-digital-asset-rfq-protocol-layers-for-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Operational Risk

Meaning ▴ Operational risk represents the potential for loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people, and systems, or from external events. </a>

**Tags:** [Trade Lifecycle](https://options.greeks.live/area/trade-lifecycle/), [Data Flow](https://options.greeks.live/area/data-flow/), [Audit Trail](https://options.greeks.live/area/audit-trail/), [Execution Management System](https://options.greeks.live/area/execution-management-system/), [Vendor Management](https://options.greeks.live/area/vendor-management/), [Firm Designated ID](https://options.greeks.live/area/firm-designated-id/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [What Are the Key Differences in Risk Profile between a Manual and an Automated RFP System?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-in-risk-profile-between-a-manual-and-an-automated-rfp-system/)
![Abstract metallic components, resembling an advanced Prime RFQ mechanism, precisely frame a teal sphere, symbolizing a liquidity pool. This depicts the market microstructure supporting RFQ protocols for high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives, ensuring capital efficiency in algorithmic trading.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-architecture-driving-rfq-protocol-execution-and-capital-efficiency-optimization.jpg)

Automated RFP systems mitigate risk by embedding control in the architecture; manual systems manage it through event-driven human intervention.

- 
### [What Are the Primary Data Linkage Challenges in Building a CAT Architecture for RFQs?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-data-linkage-challenges-in-building-a-cat-architecture-for-rfqs/)
![A central hub, pierced by a precise vector, and an angular blade abstractly represent institutional digital asset derivatives trading. This embodies a Principal's operational framework for high-fidelity RFQ protocol execution, optimizing capital efficiency and multi-leg spreads within a Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-hub.jpg)

The primary challenge is translating the conversational, multi-party RFQ workflow into the linear, event-driven data structure of CAT.

- 
### [How Does the CAT Reporting Timeline Differ for RFQ versus Standard Order Life Cycles?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-cat-reporting-timeline-differ-for-rfq-versus-standard-order-life-cycles/)
![A segmented, teal-hued system component with a dark blue inset, symbolizing an RFQ engine within a Prime RFQ, emerges from darkness. Illuminated by an optimized data flow, its textured surface represents market microstructure intricacies, facilitating high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives via private quotation for multi-leg spreads.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-intelligence-layer-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq.jpg)

CAT reporting for RFQs captures a pre-trade negotiation phase absent from the direct, linear event timeline of a standard order lifecycle.

- 
### [What Are the Best Practices for Ensuring Block Trade Data Accuracy across Jurisdictions?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-best-practices-for-ensuring-block-trade-data-accuracy-across-jurisdictions/)
![A metallic structural component interlocks with two black, dome-shaped modules, each displaying a green data indicator. This signifies a dynamic RFQ protocol within an institutional Prime RFQ, enabling high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives. Internal mechanisms underscore algorithmic trading and pre-trade analytics for capital efficiency and best execution.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/modular-rfq-protocol-engine-for-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os.jpg)

Achieving block trade data accuracy across jurisdictions requires integrated protocols, robust reconciliation, and adaptive regulatory compliance.

- 
### [Could a Large Scale Breach at Multiple Broker-Dealers Compromise the CAT’s Enforcement Model?](https://options.greeks.live/question/could-a-large-scale-breach-at-multiple-broker-dealers-compromise-the-cats-enforcement-model/)
![An intricate, transparent digital asset derivatives engine visualizes market microstructure and liquidity pool dynamics. Its precise components signify high-fidelity execution via FIX Protocol, facilitating RFQ protocols for block trade and multi-leg spread strategies within an institutional-grade Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-liquidity-ecosystem.jpg)

A large-scale breach could cripple the CAT's enforcement model by corrupting its foundational data, rendering regulatory oversight ineffective.

- 
### [What Are the Primary Operational Hurdles for Firms in Implementing CAT Reporting for Rfqs?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-operational-hurdles-for-firms-in-implementing-cat-reporting-for-rfqs/)
![A sleek, illuminated control knob emerges from a robust, metallic base, representing a Prime RFQ interface for institutional digital asset derivatives. Its glowing bands signify real-time analytics and high-fidelity execution of RFQ protocols, enabling optimal price discovery and capital efficiency in dark pools for block trades.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-system-for-optimal-execution.jpg)

The primary hurdle is architecting a system to capture and link the asynchronous, many-to-one data of RFQ responses.

- 
### [How Must an OMS Be Configured to Ensure Accurate CAT Reporting for Solicited Orders?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-must-an-oms-be-configured-to-ensure-accurate-cat-reporting-for-solicited-orders/)
![Central teal-lit mechanism with radiating pathways embodies a Prime RFQ for institutional digital asset derivatives. It signifies RFQ protocol processing, liquidity aggregation, and high-fidelity execution for multi-leg spread trades, enabling atomic settlement within market microstructure via quantitative analysis.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-core-for-institutional-digital-asset-rfq-protocol-execution-engine.jpg)

An OMS must be configured to treat the "solicited" attribute as an immutable, inherited property of an order from inception to final report.

- 
### [How Does MiFID II’S LEI Requirement Compare to the CAT’s FDID System?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-mifid-iis-lei-requirement-compare-to-the-cats-fdid-system/)
![A detailed view of an institutional-grade Digital Asset Derivatives trading interface, featuring a central liquidity pool visualization through a clear, tinted disc. Subtle market microstructure elements are visible, suggesting real-time price discovery and order book dynamics. This represents a Prime RFQ component for high-fidelity execution of RFQ protocols in multi-leg spread strategies.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-system-microstructure-display.jpg)

MiFID II's LEI identifies the global legal entity, while CAT's FDID tracks the firm-specific US trading account's order lifecycle.

- 
### [How Does the FDID to CCID Linkage Enhance Regulatory Surveillance Capabilities?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-fdid-to-ccid-linkage-enhance-regulatory-surveillance-capabilities/)
![A translucent teal triangle, an RFQ protocol interface with target price visualization, rises from radiating multi-leg spread components. This depicts Prime RFQ driven liquidity aggregation for institutional-grade Digital Asset Derivatives trading, ensuring high-fidelity execution and price discovery.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-intelligence-layer-driving-rfq-protocol-enhanced-digital-asset-derivatives-liquidity-aggregation-and-best-execution.jpg)

The FDID-to-CCID linkage creates a unified market-wide identity for each trader, enabling regulators to track activity across all firms.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "Can a Firm Use a Single Vendor for Both Ems and Cat Reporting Functions?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/can-a-firm-use-a-single-vendor-for-both-ems-and-cat-reporting-functions/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/can-a-firm-use-a-single-vendor-for-both-ems-and-cat-reporting-functions/"
    },
    "headline": "Can a Firm Use a Single Vendor for Both Ems and Cat Reporting Functions? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "A firm can use a single vendor for EMS and CAT reporting, a choice that unifies the data architecture but concentrates operational risk. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/can-a-firm-use-a-single-vendor-for-both-ems-and-cat-reporting-functions/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-03T17:37:51+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-08-03T17:37:52+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-framework-driving-high-fidelity-rfq-execution-and-optimized-market-microstructure-for-capital-efficiency.jpg",
        "caption": "An institutional-grade Crypto Derivatives OS is abstractly represented, emphasizing its core Execution Management System EMS and Principal's operational framework. It efficiently orchestrates multi-leg spreads and manages portfolio margin. Transparent elements symbolize dynamic liquidity pools and aggregated inquiry flows, vital for price discovery and implied volatility analysis. This system facilitates smart order routing across dark liquidity, ensuring best execution and atomic settlement for alpha generation."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Audit Trail",
        "CAT Reporting",
        "Consolidated Audit Trail",
        "Data Flow",
        "Data Integrity",
        "EMS",
        "Execution Management System",
        "FDID",
        "FINRA",
        "Firm Designated ID",
        "Market Microstructure",
        "Operational Risk",
        "RegTech",
        "Regulatory Technology",
        "SEC Rule 613",
        "Trade Lifecycle",
        "Vendor Management"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "FAQPage",
    "mainEntity": [
        {
            "@type": "Question",
            "name": "What Is The Core Strategic Tradeoff?",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "@type": "Answer",
                "text": "The central strategic consideration is the balance between the operational efficiencies of a single-vendor solution and the risk mitigation and functional depth offered by a multi-vendor ecosystem. A single-vendor approach creates a tightly coupled system. The data flow from trade execution to regulatory reporting is managed within a closed loop, governed by a single technology provider. This can produce significant advantages in terms of data integrity and reporting timeliness. The risk of data loss or misinterpretation during handoffs between systems is structurally minimized. The firm benefits from a unified data dictionary and a consistent timestamping methodology, which are critical for accurate CAT reporting. The responsibility for maintaining compliance with evolving CAT reporting rules falls to one partner, simplifying the firm's oversight obligations."
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Question",
            "name": "How Is The Data Flow Architected?",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "@type": "Answer",
                "text": "The architectural design of the data flow from order initiation to CAT submission is the most critical element of execution. In a single-vendor model, this flow is largely contained within the vendor's technology stack. In a multi-vendor model, the firm must architect the data flow across system boundaries. The following table outlines the key stages of this data flow and the operational considerations at each step."
            }
        }
    ]
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/can-a-firm-use-a-single-vendor-for-both-ems-and-cat-reporting-functions/
