# Can a Non-Binding Rfp Become Binding through the Conduct of the Parties Involved? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-09
**Categories:** Question

---

![A sleek, institutional-grade device featuring a reflective blue dome, representing a Crypto Derivatives OS Intelligence Layer for RFQ and Price Discovery. Its metallic arm, symbolizing Pre-Trade Analytics and Latency monitoring, ensures High-Fidelity Execution for Multi-Leg Spreads](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-intelligence-layer.jpg)

![A scratched blue sphere, representing market microstructure and liquidity pool for digital asset derivatives, encases a smooth teal sphere, symbolizing a private quotation via RFQ protocol. An institutional-grade structure suggests a Prime RFQ facilitating high-fidelity execution and managing counterparty risk](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-rfq-protocols-optimizing-digital-asset-derivative-execution-microstructure.jpg)

## Concept

The transformation of a non-binding Request for Proposal (RFP) into a binding agreement is a subtle process, rooted not in explicit declarations but in the nuanced interplay of actions, expectations, and reliance between the involved parties. At its core, an RFP is typically classified in legal and commercial frameworks as an “[invitation to treat](https://prime.greeks.live/area/invitation-to-treat/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)” or an “invitation to deal.” This designation means it is a solicitation for offers, not an offer in itself. The submission of a proposal in response to the RFP constitutes the offer, which the issuing entity is then free to accept or reject.

This foundational principle is designed to provide the issuer with maximum flexibility, allowing them to negotiate, clarify, and select a partner without being prematurely locked into a contractual relationship. The document itself is a tool for exploration, a structured way to gather information and assess the capabilities of potential vendors or service providers.

However, the clear line between invitation and offer can become blurred. The very language used within the RFP document can begin this process. An RFP that is highly prescriptive, detailing exact terms, conditions, timelines, and deliverables with little room for negotiation, starts to resemble a unilateral offer. When an issuer states it will accept the “lowest compliant bid” or outlines a rigid, non-negotiable evaluation process, it can inadvertently create a preliminary contract, often termed “Contract A” in [procurement law](https://prime.greeks.live/area/procurement-law/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite).

This preliminary contract governs the bidding process itself, obligating the issuer to follow its own stated rules with fairness and consistency. The violation of these self-imposed procedural rules can lead to legal challenges, even if the primary “Contract B” ▴ the agreement for the actual work ▴ is never signed.

> The conduct of the parties involved can effectively override the explicit “non-binding” clauses of an RFP, creating an enforceable agreement through actions and reliance.

The true pivot point often lies in the [conduct of the parties](https://prime.greeks.live/area/conduct-of-the-parties/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) after the proposal has been submitted. Actions can speak louder than the disclaimers printed in the original RFP document. When an issuing party begins to act as if an agreement is in place ▴ instructing the bidder to commence preliminary work, sharing confidential information beyond the scope of evaluation, or making [verbal assurances](https://prime.greeks.live/question/under-what-conditions-can-verbal-assurances-override-written-disclaimers-in-an-rfp-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) of a forthcoming contract ▴ the legal ground shifts.

This behavior can induce reliance on the part of the bidder, who may begin incurring costs, allocating resources, or forgoing other opportunities based on the issuer’s conduct. It is this demonstrable reliance, coupled with the issuer’s encouraging actions, that can form the basis of an [implied-in-fact contract](https://prime.greeks.live/area/implied-in-fact-contract/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) or trigger doctrines like [promissory estoppel](https://prime.greeks.live/area/promissory-estoppel/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), effectively making the “non-binding” RFP and the subsequent proposal the foundation of an enforceable obligation.

![Abstract forms on dark, a sphere balanced by intersecting planes. This signifies high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives, embodying RFQ protocols and price discovery within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-platform-microstructure-execution-prime-os.jpg)

![Abstract forms depict interconnected institutional liquidity pools and intricate market microstructure. Sharp algorithmic execution paths traverse smooth aggregated inquiry surfaces, symbolizing high-fidelity execution within a Principal's operational framework](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-prime-os-1.jpg)

## Strategy

![Abstract composition features two intersecting, sharp-edged planes—one dark, one light—representing distinct liquidity pools or multi-leg spreads. Translucent spherical elements, symbolizing digital asset derivatives and price discovery, balance on this intersection, reflecting complex market microstructure and optimal RFQ protocol execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-market-microstructure.jpg)

## The Emergence of Unintended Obligations

The strategic management of the RFP process requires a deep understanding of how legal obligations can crystallize from a series of seemingly informal interactions. The primary mechanism for this transformation is the creation of an implied contract. Unlike an express contract, where terms are explicitly stated, an implied-in-fact contract is inferred from the conduct of the parties.

For instance, if an RFP issuer selects a vendor’s proposal and, without a [formal contract](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-legal-implications-to-consider-when-transitioning-from-an-rfp-response-to-a-formal-contract/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), directs them to “begin the initial design phase” or “order the necessary hardware,” these instructions represent a significant departure from a mere evaluation process. The vendor’s compliance with these directives, coupled with the issuer’s acceptance of the preliminary work, creates a powerful inference that a binding agreement has been formed based on the terms outlined in the proposal.

Another critical legal doctrine is promissory estoppel. This principle is designed to prevent injustice when one party relies on the promise of another to its detriment. In the RFP context, if an issuer repeatedly assures a bidder that they have “won the contract” and that a formal agreement is “just a formality,” the bidder may reasonably rely on these assurances. They might hire staff, purchase materials, or decline other projects.

If the issuer then reverses its decision, the bidder could invoke promissory estoppel to recover the costs incurred in reliance on the promise, even without a signed contract. The key elements are a clear promise, reasonable reliance on that promise, and a resulting financial injury.

![A large, smooth sphere, a textured metallic sphere, and a smaller, swirling sphere rest on an angular, dark, reflective surface. This visualizes a principal liquidity pool, complex structured product, and dynamic volatility surface, representing high-fidelity execution within an institutional digital asset derivatives market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-optimized-market-microstructure-precision.jpg)

## Navigating the Contract a and Contract B Framework

In many jurisdictions, particularly in public procurement, the courts have adopted a two-contract analysis known as the “Contract A / Contract B” framework. This model provides a structured way to understand the obligations that arise during a formal bidding process.

- **Contract A** ▴ This is the “process contract.” It comes into existence the moment a bidder submits a compliant proposal in response to an RFP. The terms of Contract A are the rules of the tender process as laid out in the RFP document itself. This contract obligates the issuer to conduct the evaluation fairly, honestly, and in accordance with its stated criteria. It also obligates the bidder to honor its proposal and enter into Contract B if selected. A breach of Contract A (e.g. the issuer accepting a non-compliant bid or evaluating bids on undisclosed criteria) can lead to legal action for damages, typically the costs of preparing the bid.

- **Contract B** ▴ This is the main performance contract for the goods or services. It is formed when the issuer formally accepts a bidder’s proposal. The terms of Contract B are the specifics of the work to be done, as detailed in the RFP and the winning proposal.

The strategic implication is that even with explicit “non-binding” language, an RFP that is structured like a formal tender can create a Contract A. Issuers who wish to avoid this must carefully design their RFPs to be genuine requests for proposals and not disguised calls for tenders. This means emphasizing negotiation, flexibility, and the possibility of rejecting all proposals.

![Two reflective, disc-like structures, one tilted, one flat, symbolize the Market Microstructure of Digital Asset Derivatives. This metaphor encapsulates RFQ Protocols and High-Fidelity Execution within a Liquidity Pool for Price Discovery, vital for a Principal's Operational Framework ensuring Atomic Settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-execution-liquidity-aggregation-optimizing-market-microstructure-principal-trading-best-execution-atomic-settlement.jpg)

## Comparative Analysis of Party Conduct

The specific actions taken by both the issuer and the bidder are the ultimate determinants of whether a binding obligation is formed. The following table illustrates how different patterns of conduct can lead to different legal interpretations.

| Conduct of RFP Issuer | Conduct of Bidder | Likely Legal Interpretation |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Issues RFP with clear non-binding disclaimers. Conducts all communication formally through a single point of contact. Makes no promises or assurances. | Submits proposal. Awaits formal notification of award. Incurs no costs beyond proposal preparation. | Non-Binding. The RFP remains an invitation to treat. No implied contract is formed. |
| Issues a highly detailed RFP. After submission, makes verbal statements like “You’ve got the job, we’re just waiting on legal.” | Relies on verbal assurances. Hires two new employees specifically for the project and declines another contract. | Potentially Binding under Promissory Estoppel. The bidder’s detrimental reliance on the issuer’s promise could be legally enforceable. |
| Selects a proposal and emails the bidder to “Please proceed with the initial project setup as outlined in Phase 1 of your proposal.” | Begins work on Phase 1. Submits an invoice for the initial setup, which the issuer pays. | Binding Implied-in-Fact Contract. The instruction to proceed and the subsequent payment for work performed are strong evidence of a mutual intention to be bound by the proposal’s terms. |
| Runs a formal process with strict deadlines and evaluation criteria, creating a “Contract A.” Then awards the project based on an undisclosed criterion. | Submitted a fully compliant bid that should have scored highest based on the stated criteria. | Breach of Contract A. The issuer has violated the fairness and good faith obligations of the process contract, potentially entitling the bidder to damages. |

![A dynamic composition depicts an institutional-grade RFQ pipeline connecting a vast liquidity pool to a split circular element representing price discovery and implied volatility. This visual metaphor highlights the precision of an execution management system for digital asset derivatives via private quotation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-pipeline-for-precise-price-discovery-and-volatility-surface-analysis.jpg)

![Sharp, layered planes, one deep blue, one light, intersect a luminous sphere and a vast, curved teal surface. This abstractly represents high-fidelity algorithmic trading and multi-leg spread execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-system-microstructure.jpg)

## Execution

The transition from a theoretical understanding of RFP legal risks to their practical management requires a disciplined, systems-based approach. It involves architecting the entire procurement process, from document drafting to post-submission communication, with the explicit goal of controlling the formation of legal obligations. This is a matter of operational precision, where language, conduct, and documentation are the primary tools for risk mitigation.

![A transparent sphere, bisected by dark rods, symbolizes an RFQ protocol's core. This represents multi-leg spread execution within a high-fidelity market microstructure for institutional grade digital asset derivatives, ensuring optimal price discovery and capital efficiency via Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## The Operational Playbook

To maintain the non-binding nature of an RFP, both issuers and bidders must adhere to a strict operational protocol. The objective is to prevent the ambiguity and reliance that lead to implied contracts or estoppel claims. The following checklists provide a procedural guide for each party.

![Sleek Prime RFQ interface for institutional digital asset derivatives. An elongated panel displays dynamic numeric readouts, symbolizing multi-leg spread execution and real-time market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-rfq-options.jpg)

## For RFP Issuers ▴ A Protocol for Maintaining Flexibility

- **Drafting with Precision** ▴ The RFP document is the foundational layer of control.

<li>**Incorporate Explicit Disclaimers** ▴ Use clear, unambiguous language stating that the RFP is not an offer, creates no contractual obligations, and may be canceled at any time. A key phrase is ▴ “This Request for Proposals is an invitation for expressions of interest and does not constitute an offer to enter into a contract.”

- **Reserve All Rights** ▴ Explicitly state the issuer’s right to reject any or all proposals, to negotiate with one or more parties, and to award a contract to any party, regardless of the proposal’s ranking.

- **Avoid Promissory Language** ▴ Eliminate words that imply a commitment, such as “will award” or “shall select.” Replace them with more flexible terms like “may select” or “intends to.”

</li>
- **Controlling Communications** ▴ All interactions post-submission must be managed to prevent informal commitments.

<li>**Designate a Single Point of Contact** ▴ Channel all questions and communications through a designated procurement officer or a centralized system. This prevents project managers or technical staff from making unauthorized promises.

- **Standardize Responses** ▴ Use templates for acknowledging receipt of proposals and for answering questions, ensuring consistent and non-committal language.

- **Prohibit “Ghosting”** ▴ Formally and professionally notify all unsuccessful bidders as soon as a decision is made. This closes the loop and prevents lingering expectations.

</li>
- **Managing Conduct** ▴ Actions must align with the non-binding intent.

<li>**Do Not Request or Accept Work** ▴ Never ask a bidder to begin work, even in a preliminary capacity, before a formal, written contract is fully executed.

- **Document Everything** ▴ Maintain a meticulous record of all communications, meetings, and decisions in a centralized procurement file or system. This creates an audit trail that can be crucial in a dispute.

- **Separate Evaluation from Negotiation** ▴ Complete the entire evaluation process before entering into any substantive negotiations. This reinforces the idea that the proposal is a starting point for discussion, not a final offer.

</li>

![A sleek, multi-layered digital asset derivatives platform highlights a teal sphere, symbolizing a core liquidity pool or atomic settlement node. The perforated white interface represents an RFQ protocol's aggregated inquiry points for multi-leg spread execution, reflecting precise market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-core-execution-system.jpg)

## For Bidders ▴ A Protocol for Managing Expectations

- **Scrutinize the RFP Document** ▴ Understand the issuer’s stated intent. Look for the disclaimers and rights reservations mentioned above. The presence of strong non-binding language is a clear signal of the issuer’s intent.

- **Formalize All Communications** ▴ Submit all questions in writing. If verbal assurances are given, follow up with an email confirming the conversation (e.g. “To confirm our discussion this morning, you have indicated. “). This creates a written record.

- **Avoid Speculative Investment** ▴ Do not incur any costs beyond the preparation of the proposal itself without a signed contract. If the issuer requests preliminary work, respond with a request for a limited-scope, paid pilot agreement or a formal letter of intent that clearly outlines the terms and compensation.

- **Document Your Reliance** ▴ If you do act based on an issuer’s promise, keep detailed records of the specific promise made, by whom, and the exact actions and costs you incurred as a direct result. This documentation is essential for any potential promissory estoppel claim.

![Abstract institutional-grade Crypto Derivatives OS. Metallic trusses depict market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-market-microstructure-optimizing-rfq-protocols-for-high-fidelity-execution-via-prime-os.jpg)

## Quantitative Modeling and Data Analysis

While contract law is qualitative, a quantitative risk management framework can be applied to assess the likelihood of an RFP process creating unintended binding obligations. The following table models the risk level based on key observable factors. The “Risk Score” is a conceptual metric where a higher score indicates a greater probability that a court could find a binding obligation.

| Factor | Low Risk (Score ▴ 1) | Medium Risk (Score ▴ 3) | High Risk (Score ▴ 5) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| RFP Language | Strong, clear non-binding disclaimers; reserves all rights. | Ambiguous language; some promissory phrases (“will award”). | No disclaimers; highly prescriptive terms; language suggests a formal tender. |
| Issuer Communication | Formal, written, through a single point of contact. | Informal verbal discussions; some mixed messages from different staff. | Direct verbal assurances of award; instructions to proceed given via email or phone. |
| Post-Submission Conduct | No action taken until a formal contract is signed. | Issuer requests “minor preliminary planning” or “ideation.” | Issuer directs bidder to start work, order materials, or assign staff. |
| Bidder Reliance | No costs incurred beyond proposal writing. | Bidder delays other opportunities based on verbal encouragement. | Bidder incurs significant, demonstrable costs (hiring, purchasing) based on issuer’s direction. |
| Documentation | Complete, centralized record of all interactions. | Inconsistent or incomplete records; reliance on memory. | No formal records; trail of informal emails and conflicting notes. |

> A disciplined procurement system, where actions and documentation are meticulously aligned with the initial non-binding intent, is the most effective defense against unintended contractual obligations.

![Precision metallic mechanism with a central translucent sphere, embodying institutional RFQ protocols for digital asset derivatives. This core represents high-fidelity execution within a Prime RFQ, optimizing price discovery and liquidity aggregation for block trades, ensuring capital efficiency and atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-prime-os-execution-hub.jpg)

## Predictive Scenario Analysis

![A pleated, fan-like structure embodying market microstructure and liquidity aggregation converges with sharp, crystalline forms, symbolizing high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives. This abstract visualizes RFQ protocols optimizing multi-leg spreads and managing implied volatility within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure.jpg)

## Case Study ▴ The Innovatech Corp. and Global Dynamics RFP

Innovatech Corp. a mid-sized technology firm, submitted a detailed proposal in response to an RFP from [Global Dynamics](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-rfq-protocol-alter-the-dynamics-of-price-discovery-compared-to-a-lit-order-book/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), a large manufacturing conglomerate, for a complex logistics software overhaul. The RFP contained standard language stating it was “non-binding and did not constitute an offer.”

After the submission deadline, Sarah, the project lead at Global Dynamics, was impressed with Innovatech’s proposal. She called Mark, her counterpart at Innovatech, and said, “Your proposal is fantastic. It’s exactly what we need. We’re definitely moving forward with you.

The formal contract is just a rubber stamp from legal, which will take a couple of weeks. Can you get your team started on the data mapping? We’re on a tight schedule.”

Eager to impress their new client, Mark agreed. He assigned three senior engineers to the project, pulling them off another billable engagement. They spent the next three weeks, totaling over 400 hours of work, mapping Global Dynamics’ complex data structures. Mark sent Sarah a brief weekly email updating her on their progress, to which she replied, “Great work!”

A month later, Mark had heard nothing about the formal contract. He called Sarah, who informed him that due to an unexpected corporate restructuring, the project was canceled. She apologized for the “misunderstanding” but stated that since there was no signed contract, Global Dynamics had no obligation to pay for the work performed.

Innovatech’s legal counsel initiated a claim against Global Dynamics, not for breach of the main contract, but on two alternative grounds:

- **Implied-in-Fact Contract** ▴ They argued that Sarah’s direct instruction to “get your team started,” Mark’s agreement, the subsequent performance of the work, and Sarah’s acknowledgment of that work (“Great work!”) constituted an implied contract for the preliminary data mapping phase. The terms of this contract were based on the rates and scope outlined in the original proposal.

- **Promissory Estoppel** ▴ They argued that Sarah’s clear promise (“We’re definitely moving forward with you”) was intended to be relied upon. Innovatech reasonably relied on this promise by assigning resources and incurring significant labor costs, to its detriment.

In this scenario, a court would likely find in favor of Innovatech. Sarah’s conduct and explicit instructions overrode the RFP’s non-binding disclaimer. The combination of a direct request to perform work and the subsequent reliance by Innovatech created an enforceable obligation for Global Dynamics to compensate Innovatech for the value of the work performed.

![A deconstructed spherical object, segmented into distinct horizontal layers, slightly offset, symbolizing the granular components of an institutional digital asset derivatives platform. Each layer represents a liquidity pool or RFQ protocol, showcasing modular execution pathways and dynamic price discovery within a Prime RFQ architecture for high-fidelity execution and systemic risk mitigation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/modular-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-framework-dissected-for-optimal-rfq-performance.jpg)

## System Integration and Technological Architecture

Modern e-procurement platforms and contract lifecycle management (CLM) systems offer a powerful technological framework for mitigating the risks of unintended binding. These systems can be architected to enforce the operational playbook described above.

- **Templated RFP Generation** ▴ Systems can house pre-approved RFP templates with robust legal disclaimers, ensuring that all solicitations start from a controlled, low-risk baseline.

- **Controlled Communication Portals** ▴ All communication between the issuer and bidders can be forced through a secure, auditable portal within the procurement system. This prevents “off-the-record” conversations and creates a single source of truth for all interactions. API endpoints can log every message, query, and response, creating an immutable audit trail.

- **Status-Based Access Control** ▴ The system can be configured to prevent key actions until certain conditions are met. For example, project managers could be technologically blocked from sending messages to a bidder once a proposal is submitted, with all communication rights reverting to the procurement officer. The system would only unlock negotiation modules after the formal evaluation phase is logged as complete.

- **Digital Audit Trails** ▴ Every action ▴ from the moment an RFP is issued to the final contract signature ▴ is timestamped and logged. This provides irrefutable evidence of who did what and when, which is invaluable in resolving disputes. It can demonstrate that no work was requested or authorized before the execution of a formal digital contract.

![A robust metallic framework supports a teal half-sphere, symbolizing an institutional grade digital asset derivative or block trade processed within a Prime RFQ environment. This abstract view highlights the intricate market microstructure and high-fidelity execution of an RFQ protocol, ensuring capital efficiency and minimizing slippage through precise system interaction](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine.jpg)

## References

- Collins, H. (2003). _The Law of Contract_. Cambridge University Press.

- Feldman, S. W. (2018). _Government Contract Guidebook_. Wolters Kluwer.

- Marston, J. (1992). The Contracts in Tendering. _Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 118_(2), 330-343.

- Swan, A. (2020). _Canadian Contract Law_ (4th ed.). LexisNexis Canada.

- Atiyah, P. S. & Smith, S. A. (2006). _Atiyah’s Introduction to the Law of Contract_. Oxford University Press.

- Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 90 (1981). American Law Institute.

- Waddams, S. M. (2017). _The Law of Contracts_ (7th ed.). Canada Law Book.

- Butler, M. (1977). The Battle of the Forms ▴ A New Approach. _The Modern Law Review, 40_(4), 421-427.

![An opaque principal's operational framework half-sphere interfaces a translucent digital asset derivatives sphere, revealing implied volatility. This symbolizes high-fidelity execution via an RFQ protocol, enabling private quotation within the market microstructure and deep liquidity pool for a robust Crypto Derivatives OS](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine-13.jpg)

## Reflection

![The image depicts two distinct liquidity pools or market segments, intersected by algorithmic trading pathways. A central dark sphere represents price discovery and implied volatility within the market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-multi-leg-spread-execution-microstructure.jpg)

## The Architecture of Intent

The principles governing the transformation of a non-binding RFP into a binding obligation reveal a deeper truth about commercial interactions. Legal status is not a static label affixed to a document, but a dynamic state that reflects the cumulative weight of actions, communications, and dependencies. The initial “non-binding” clause is merely the first statement in a conversation; the final word belongs to the conduct that follows. Understanding this principle requires a shift in perspective ▴ from viewing procurement as a series of discrete steps to seeing it as the management of a single, continuous system of intent.

Every email, every phone call, and every instruction contributes to the architecture of this system. Does the structure you are building align with your original blueprint of a non-binding exploration, or are you inadvertently laying the foundation for an obligation you never intended to assume? The most robust defense is not a perfectly worded disclaimer buried in a document, but an operational framework where every component, from technological platforms to human behavior, is aligned with a clear and consistent strategic purpose. The ultimate control lies not in what you write, but in what you do.

![A precision algorithmic core with layered rings on a reflective surface signifies high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives. It optimizes RFQ protocols for price discovery, channeling dark liquidity within a robust Prime RFQ for capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimized-for-precision.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/invitation-to-treat/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sophisticated, modular mechanical assembly illustrates an RFQ protocol for institutional digital asset derivatives. Reflective elements and distinct quadrants symbolize dynamic liquidity aggregation and high-fidelity execution for Bitcoin options](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-architecture.jpg)

## Invitation to Treat

Meaning ▴ An Invitation to Treat (I2T) represents a communication from one party expressing a willingness to enter into negotiations, signaling an openness to receive offers rather than making a binding offer itself. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/procurement-law/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A dark, circular metallic platform features a central, polished spherical hub, bisected by a taut green band. This embodies a robust Prime RFQ for institutional digital asset derivatives, enabling high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols, optimizing market microstructure for best execution, and mitigating counterparty risk through atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-optimizing-high-fidelity-execution-across-diverse-market-microstructures.jpg)

## Procurement Law

Meaning ▴ Procurement Law defines the regulatory and contractual framework for institutional acquisition of goods and services. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/conduct-of-the-parties/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract geometric forms converge around a central RFQ protocol engine, symbolizing institutional digital asset derivatives trading. Transparent elements represent real-time market data and algorithmic execution paths, while solid panels denote principal liquidity and robust counterparty relationships](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-core-for-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Conduct of the Parties

Meaning ▴ The "Conduct of the Parties" refers to the empirically observable and quantifiable patterns of behavior exhibited by participants interacting within a digital asset derivatives trading system. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/under-what-conditions-can-verbal-assurances-override-written-disclaimers-in-an-rfp-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A crystalline sphere, representing aggregated price discovery and implied volatility, rests precisely on a secure execution rail. This symbolizes a Principal's high-fidelity execution within a sophisticated digital asset derivatives framework, connecting a prime brokerage gateway to a robust liquidity pipeline, ensuring atomic settlement and minimal slippage for institutional block trades](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-platform-optimizing-liquidity-and-risk-management-through-advanced-protocols.jpg)

## Verbal Assurances

Verbal assurances override written disclaimers only when a clear promise induces detrimental reliance, making enforcement essential for justice. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/implied-in-fact-contract/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Intersecting abstract geometric planes depict institutional grade RFQ protocols and market microstructure. Speckled surfaces reflect complex order book dynamics and implied volatility, while smooth planes represent high-fidelity execution channels and private quotation systems for digital asset derivatives within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-rfq-protocols-digital-asset-microstructure-execution.jpg)

## Implied-In-Fact Contract

Meaning ▴ An Implied-in-Fact Contract is an agreement established through the conduct and actions of parties, rather than through explicit verbal or written terms. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/promissory-estoppel/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract, sleek forms represent an institutional-grade Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives. Interlocking elements denote RFQ protocol optimization and price discovery across dark pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine-5.jpg)

## Promissory Estoppel

Meaning ▴ Promissory Estoppel defines a legal doctrine preventing a party from reneging on a promise when the other party has reasonably relied on that promise to their detriment, even in the absence of a formal contract. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-legal-implications-to-consider-when-transitioning-from-an-rfp-response-to-a-formal-contract/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A metallic blade signifies high-fidelity execution and smart order routing, piercing a complex Prime RFQ orb. Within, market microstructure, algorithmic trading, and liquidity pools are visualized](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-prime-os-execution-precision.jpg)

## Formal Contract

The transition from RFP to contract is a legally significant event that transforms a proposal into a binding agreement with enforceable obligations. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-rfq-protocol-alter-the-dynamics-of-price-discovery-compared-to-a-lit-order-book/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Two intersecting metallic structures form a precise 'X', symbolizing RFQ protocols and algorithmic execution in institutional digital asset derivatives. This represents market microstructure optimization, enabling high-fidelity execution of block trades with atomic settlement for capital efficiency via a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-market-microstructure-execution.jpg)

## Global Dynamics

The RFQ protocol transforms price discovery from a public broadcast into a private, targeted negotiation, optimizing for information control. </a>

**Tags:** [RFP Disclaimers](https://options.greeks.live/area/rfp-disclaimers/), [E-Procurement Systems](https://options.greeks.live/area/e-procurement-systems/), [Detrimental Reliance](https://options.greeks.live/area/detrimental-reliance/), [Promissory Estoppel](https://options.greeks.live/area/promissory-estoppel/), [Battle of the Forms](https://options.greeks.live/area/battle-of-the-forms/), [Conduct of the Parties](https://options.greeks.live/area/conduct-of-the-parties/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [Can Certain Clauses in a Non-Binding Rfp Accidentally Create a Legally Binding Obligation?](https://options.greeks.live/question/can-certain-clauses-in-a-non-binding-rfp-accidentally-create-a-legally-binding-obligation/)
![A transparent, multi-faceted component, indicative of an RFQ engine's intricate market microstructure logic, emerges from complex FIX Protocol connectivity. Its sharp edges signify high-fidelity execution and price discovery precision for institutional digital asset derivatives. This Prime RFQ module optimizes algorithmic trading and capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimized-for-best-execution.jpg)

An RFP's non-binding status is contingent on its language and process, as promissory clauses can create unintended legal obligations.

- 
### [Can a Verbal Clarification during an RFP Ever Be Considered Legally Binding on the Issuer?](https://options.greeks.live/question/can-a-verbal-clarification-during-an-rfp-ever-be-considered-legally-binding-on-the-issuer/)
![Teal capsule represents a private quotation for multi-leg spreads within a Prime RFQ, enabling high-fidelity institutional digital asset derivatives execution. Dark spheres symbolize aggregated inquiry from liquidity pools. Angled structures depict smart order routing pathways for optimal price discovery.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-prime-os-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

A verbal clarification in an RFP is not legally binding, as the written contract is paramount, except in narrow cases of detrimental reliance.

- 
### [What Are the Legal Implications to Consider When Formulating the Reason for an Rfp Cancellation?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-legal-implications-to-consider-when-formulating-the-reason-for-an-rfp-cancellation/)
![A transparent bar precisely intersects a dark blue circular module, symbolizing an RFQ protocol for institutional digital asset derivatives. This depicts high-fidelity execution within a dynamic liquidity pool, optimizing market microstructure via a Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-protocol-for-prime-os-execution.jpg)

Canceling an RFP requires a defensible, transparent reason to mitigate legal risks from implied contracts and promissory estoppel claims.

- 
### [How Does the Legal Doctrine of Promissory Estoppel Apply to Verbal Assurances during the Rfp Process?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-legal-doctrine-of-promissory-estoppel-apply-to-verbal-assurances-during-the-rfp-process/)
![A central core represents a Prime RFQ engine, facilitating high-fidelity execution. Transparent, layered structures denote aggregated liquidity pools and multi-leg spread strategies. Internal patterns symbolize market microstructure data streams, enabling algorithmic pricing and optimal price discovery for institutional digital asset derivatives.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-engine-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

Promissory estoppel enforces verbal RFP assurances when a bidder's detrimental reliance makes it the only just outcome.

- 
### [What Are the Legal Grounds for a Vendor to Sue for Proposal Costs after an RFP Is Canceled?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-legal-grounds-for-a-vendor-to-sue-for-proposal-costs-after-an-rfp-is-canceled/)
![A sleek, light-colored, egg-shaped component precisely connects to a darker, ergonomic base, signifying high-fidelity integration. This modular design embodies an institutional-grade Crypto Derivatives OS, optimizing RFQ protocols for atomic settlement and best execution within a robust Principal's operational framework, enhancing market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-core-principal-system.jpg)

A vendor may sue for proposal costs if the client's explicit promises or unfair process created a legal duty that overrides standard RFP disclaimers.

- 
### [What Are the Key Legal Differences between a Response to an Rfp and an Rfq?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-legal-differences-between-a-response-to-an-rfp-and-an-rfq/)
![A central illuminated hub with four light beams forming an 'X' against dark geometric planes. This embodies a Prime RFQ orchestrating multi-leg spread execution, aggregating RFQ liquidity across diverse venues for optimal price discovery and high-fidelity execution of institutional digital asset derivatives.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-orchestrating-high-fidelity-execution-and-optimal-price-discovery.jpg)

An RFQ response is a binding offer forming a contract upon acceptance; an RFP response is an invitation to negotiate.

- 
### [What Are the Legal Differences between a Tender and an Rfp Process?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-legal-differences-between-a-tender-and-an-rfp-process/)
![A metallic, circular mechanism, a precision control interface, rests on a dark circuit board. This symbolizes the core intelligence layer of a Prime RFQ, enabling low-latency, high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives via optimized RFQ protocols, refining market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/precision-rfq-protocol-engine-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

A tender legally binds bidders to a firm offer upon submission, while an RFP initiates a flexible negotiation toward a final contract.

- 
### [When Does an Rfp Legally Become a Tender in the Eyes of a Court?](https://options.greeks.live/question/when-does-an-rfp-legally-become-a-tender-in-the-eyes-of-a-court/)
![A futuristic apparatus visualizes high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives. A transparent sphere represents a private quotation or block trade, balanced on a teal Principal's operational framework, signifying capital efficiency within an RFQ protocol. The sharp upper blade implies price discovery and best execution across market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-via-prime-os.jpg)

An RFP legally becomes a tender when its terms create a binding process contract, obligating parties to a fair and structured competition.

- 
### [What Are the First Steps a Company Should Take If It Suspects an Rfp Was Canceled in Bad Faith?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-first-steps-a-company-should-take-if-it-suspects-an-rfp-was-canceled-in-bad-faith/)
![Intersecting multi-asset liquidity channels with an embedded intelligence layer define this precision-engineered framework. It symbolizes advanced institutional digital asset RFQ protocols, visualizing sophisticated market microstructure for high-fidelity execution, mitigating counterparty risk and enabling atomic settlement across crypto derivatives.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-system-microstructure-dynamics.jpg)

Suspected bad faith RFP cancellation requires immediate evidence preservation and a calculated assessment of legal and commercial remedies.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "Can a Non-Binding Rfp Become Binding through the Conduct of the Parties Involved?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/can-a-non-binding-rfp-become-binding-through-the-conduct-of-the-parties-involved/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/can-a-non-binding-rfp-become-binding-through-the-conduct-of-the-parties-involved/"
    },
    "headline": "Can a Non-Binding Rfp Become Binding through the Conduct of the Parties Involved? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "A non-binding RFP becomes binding when the parties' conduct creates an implied agreement or one party's reliance on a promise makes it enforceable. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/can-a-non-binding-rfp-become-binding-through-the-conduct-of-the-parties-involved/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-09T12:36:09+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-08-09T12:36:13+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-system-microstructure.jpg",
        "caption": "Angular, layered planes, one blue, one light, intersect a luminous sphere and curved teal backdrop. This abstractly represents the market microstructure of institutional digital asset derivatives. It highlights high-fidelity algorithmic trading, multi-leg spread execution, and RFQ protocol optimization. The sphere symbolizes a prime brokerage liquidity pool, navigating dark pool latent liquidity for robust price discovery and atomic settlement within the Prime RFQ intelligence layer."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Battle of the Forms",
        "Conduct of the Parties",
        "Detrimental Reliance",
        "E-Procurement Systems",
        "Good Faith in Bidding",
        "Implied-in-Fact Contract",
        "Invitation to Treat",
        "Procurement Law",
        "Promissory Estoppel",
        "RFP Disclaimers"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/can-a-non-binding-rfp-become-binding-through-the-conduct-of-the-parties-involved/
