# Can a Public Body Be Subject to Judicial Review for a Non-Binding Rfp Process? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-08
**Categories:** Question

---

![A transparent glass sphere rests precisely on a metallic rod, connecting a grey structural element and a dark teal engineered module with a clear lens. This symbolizes atomic settlement of digital asset derivatives via private quotation within a Prime RFQ, showcasing high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency for RFQ protocols and liquidity aggregation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/architecting-high-fidelity-execution-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-and-systemic-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

![A precisely engineered system features layered grey and beige plates, representing distinct liquidity pools or market segments, connected by a central dark blue RFQ protocol hub. Transparent teal bars, symbolizing multi-leg options spreads or algorithmic trading pathways, intersect through this core, facilitating price discovery and high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives via an institutional-grade Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-facilitating-high-fidelity-multi-leg-options-spread-execution-best-price-discovery-and-latent-liquidity-access-for-prime-brokerage.jpg)

## Concept

The intersection of public procurement and [administrative law](https://prime.greeks.live/area/administrative-law/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) presents a complex operational field. A central question within this domain is the susceptibility of a public body to judicial review, particularly concerning a [procurement process](https://prime.greeks.live/area/procurement-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) explicitly labeled as a non-binding Request for Proposal (RFP). The very designation “non-binding” suggests a level of discretion and freedom from the rigid contractual obligations that typically characterize formal tender processes. Yet, the entity in question is a public body, an instrument of the state, which operates under a distinct set of legal principles.

Its actions, including its commercial and procurement decisions, are exercises of a public function. This status introduces a layer of accountability that is absent in purely private commercial dealings. The power of [judicial review](https://prime.greeks.live/area/judicial-review/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) exists to ensure that public authorities act lawfully, rationally, and with [procedural fairness](https://prime.greeks.live/area/procedural-fairness/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). Therefore, a direct line of inquiry emerges ▴ to what extent can a public body, through carefully drafted RFP terms, insulate its procurement decisions from the scrutiny of the courts?

Understanding this dynamic requires an appreciation for the two parallel legal frameworks at play. On one hand, there is the private law of contracts, which governs the formation of binding agreements. In the procurement context, this often manifests as the “[Contract A](https://prime.greeks.live/area/contract-a/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)/Contract B” analysis, a legal framework established in Canadian law but influential in commonwealth jurisdictions. This model posits that a compliant bid in response to a tender call forms an initial [process contract](https://prime.greeks.live/area/process-contract/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (Contract A), which dictates the rules of the procurement competition, separate from the ultimate performance contract (Contract B).

[Public bodies](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-do-regulatory-bodies-view-best-execution-for-assets-without-public-prices/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) often use [non-binding RFP](https://prime.greeks.live/area/non-binding-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) language specifically to avoid the creation of Contract A and the associated contractual duties of fairness and the risk of damages for lost profits. On the other hand, there is public administrative law, which is concerned with the legality and fairness of government action. A public body’s duty to be fair is a principle of administrative law, and it does not simply vanish because the body has chosen a procurement vehicle designed to avoid contractual liability.

> A public body’s procurement activities, even when structured as non-binding, remain an exercise of a public function and are therefore subject to the principles of administrative law.

The core of the matter resides in the source of the obligation. While a non-binding RFP may successfully preclude a private law claim for breach of contract and damages, it does not eliminate the public law duties of fairness and reasonableness that attach to the decisions of a public authority. A court, in a judicial review application, is not looking for a breach of a “process contract.” Instead, it is examining whether the public body exercised its statutory or public power in a manner that was lawful, rational, and procedurally fair. An aggrieved bidder, therefore, may not have a claim for damages but could still possess a viable route to challenge the procurement outcome itself.

This could lead to remedies such as an order to quash the contract award and require the public body to re-evaluate the proposals or conduct a new procurement process. The system is designed to uphold the integrity of public purchasing, ensuring that decisions are made based on the established rules of the competition and not on arbitrary or improper grounds. This accountability is fundamental to maintaining public confidence and ensuring that the expenditure of public funds is conducted in a transparent and equitable manner.

![A precise mechanical instrument with intersecting transparent and opaque hands, representing the intricate market microstructure of institutional digital asset derivatives. This visual metaphor highlights dynamic price discovery and bid-ask spread dynamics within RFQ protocols, emphasizing high-fidelity execution and latent liquidity through a robust Prime RFQ for atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineering-driving-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-across-advanced-rfq-protocols-and-prime-brokerage-frameworks.jpg)

![A robust, dark metallic platform, indicative of an institutional-grade execution management system. Its precise, machined components suggest high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-platform-high-fidelity-price-discovery-and-atomic-settlement-infrastructure.jpg)

## Strategy

For a participant in a [public procurement](https://prime.greeks.live/area/public-procurement/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) process, understanding the strategic avenues for challenging a flawed, non-binding RFP is a critical component of risk management and corporate governance. The primary strategic decision involves shifting the analytical framework from a private law contract dispute to a public law administrative challenge. This represents a move away from seeking damages for [lost profits](https://prime.greeks.live/area/lost-profits/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) and toward remedies that invalidate the procurement decision itself. The legal architecture for such a challenge rests on several key administrative law principles that provide the grounds for judicial review.

![A sleek, dark sphere, symbolizing the Intelligence Layer of a Prime RFQ, rests on a sophisticated institutional grade platform. Its surface displays volatility surface data, hinting at quantitative analysis for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-platform-intelligence-layer-optimizing-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Foundations for a Challenge

An aggrieved proponent’s strategy is built upon demonstrating that the public body, despite the “non-binding” nature of the RFP, failed to meet its public law obligations. These obligations persist even when contractual ones have been successfully disclaimed. The strategy is to prove that the decision-making process was so flawed that it warrants court intervention.

![Intersecting digital architecture with glowing conduits symbolizes Principal's operational framework. An RFQ engine ensures high-fidelity execution of Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives, facilitating block trades, multi-leg spreads](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## The Duty of Procedural Fairness

The most potent strategic tool is the duty of procedural fairness. This doctrine holds that a public body, when making a decision that affects the rights, privileges, or interests of an individual or entity, must do so in a fair manner. In the context of an RFP, this translates into a set of implied duties. Proponents have a [legitimate expectation](https://prime.greeks.live/area/legitimate-expectation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) that the public body will adhere to the evaluation criteria and process outlined in its own RFP documents.

A strategy centered on procedural fairness would seek to identify and document any deviations from this stated process. Examples of such breaches include:

- **Undisclosed Criteria** ▴ The evaluation team based its decision on factors not mentioned in the RFP. This is a classic breach, as it undermines the transparency of the process and disadvantages proponents who tailored their submissions to the published criteria.

- **Bias** ▴ A decision-maker had a conflict of interest or a demonstrable bias in favor of a particular bidder.

- **Improper Bid Repair** ▴ The public body allowed the winning bidder to amend a non-compliant proposal after the submission deadline, giving them an unfair advantage.

- **Failure to Investigate** ▴ The evaluation committee ignored or failed to investigate clear ambiguities or errors in the winning proposal.

![A metallic, modular trading interface with black and grey circular elements, signifying distinct market microstructure components and liquidity pools. A precise, blue-cored probe diagonally integrates, representing an advanced RFQ engine for granular price discovery and atomic settlement of multi-leg spread strategies in institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-system-facilitating-high-fidelity-execution-price-discovery.jpg)

## The Standard of Reasonableness

A complementary strategic angle involves challenging the substantive reasonableness of the decision itself. While courts show a degree of deference to the expertise of public bodies in their decision-making, a decision can be overturned if it is found to be unreasonable. A decision is generally considered unreasonable if it is not supported by any evidence, or if the conclusion reached is not one that a reasonable decision-maker, acting within the confines of the law and evidence, could have reached. This is a higher bar to clear than procedural fairness, but it can be a viable strategy if the outcome of the RFP is patently illogical or contrary to the information provided in the proposals.

> Even without a binding process contract, public bodies are held to a standard of procedural correctness and substantive reasonableness in their procurement decisions.

![A central split circular mechanism, half teal with liquid droplets, intersects four reflective angular planes. This abstractly depicts an institutional RFQ protocol for digital asset options, enabling principal-led liquidity provision and block trade execution with high-fidelity price discovery within a low-latency market microstructure, ensuring capital efficiency and atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-protocol-core-system-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-aggregated-liquidity.jpg)

## Comparing Strategic Legal Frameworks

The choice between a contractual claim (when available) and a judicial review application involves a careful consideration of objectives and potential outcomes. The following table compares the key features of these two strategic paths.

### Table 1 ▴ Comparison of Legal Challenge Strategies

| Feature | Contractual Claim (Contract A) | Judicial Review Application |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Basis of Claim | Breach of the implied terms of the “process contract” (Contract A), such as the duty of fairness and good faith. | Breach of public law duties, including procedural fairness, legality, and reasonableness. |
| Primary Remedy | Damages for lost profits that would have been earned on the performance contract (Contract B). | Prerogative remedies ▴ Certiorari (quashing the decision), Mandamus (compelling a re-evaluation), Prohibition. |
| Applicability | Applies only when the RFP terms are found to have created an intention to form contractual relations (i.e. a Contract A). | Applies to decisions of public bodies exercising a public function, regardless of whether a process contract was formed. |
| Strategic Goal | Monetary compensation for the lost business opportunity. | To invalidate the flawed procurement outcome and force a fair reconsideration of the proposals. |

Ultimately, the viability of a judicial review strategy depends on the specific facts of the case and the conduct of the public body. A proponent must meticulously document the procurement process, compare the public body’s actions against the rules set out in the RFP, and build a case that demonstrates a clear departure from the principles of fairness and reasonableness. While a non-binding RFP closes the door on a claim for damages, it leaves open the critical window of public law accountability.

![A dark central hub with three reflective, translucent blades extending. This represents a Principal's operational framework for digital asset derivatives, processing aggregated liquidity and multi-leg spread inquiries](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-rfq-protocol-engine-for-high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

![Sleek, modular infrastructure for institutional digital asset derivatives trading. Its intersecting elements symbolize integrated RFQ protocols, facilitating high-fidelity execution and precise price discovery across complex multi-leg spreads](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system-optimizing-high-fidelity-block-trade-liquidity-and-multi-leg-spread-precision.jpg)

## Execution

Executing a judicial review of a non-binding RFP process requires a disciplined, evidence-based approach. The objective is to construct a compelling case for judicial intervention by demonstrating a material failure in the public body’s decision-making process. This is a procedural undertaking where meticulous documentation and a clear articulation of the legal errors are paramount.

![A metallic disc, reminiscent of a sophisticated market interface, features two precise pointers radiating from a glowing central hub. This visualizes RFQ protocols driving price discovery within institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-price-discovery.jpg)

## A Procedural Playbook for the Aggrieved Proponent

An organization contemplating a legal challenge must operate with precision from the moment it suspects a flaw in the procurement process. The following steps outline a robust operational sequence for pursuing a judicial review.

- **Immediate Standstill And Information Preservation** ▴ Upon notification of an unsuccessful bid, the first action is to request a detailed debriefing from the public body. Concurrently, all internal documentation related to the proposal’s preparation, communications with the public body, and analysis of the RFP should be secured and cataloged. This includes emails, draft documents, notes from meetings, and records of all submission confirmations.

- **The Debriefing Analysis** ▴ The debriefing is a critical intelligence-gathering opportunity. The proponent’s team should press for specific reasons for their proposal’s rejection, focusing on which evaluation criteria were not met. The answers provided must be carefully documented and compared against the evaluation criteria published in the RFP. Any inconsistencies or vague explanations can become foundational evidence.

- **Evidence Compilation And Gap Analysis** ▴ The next step is to build a comprehensive evidence file. This involves a side-by-side comparison of the RFP’s procedural rules with the public body’s actual conduct, as observed and documented. The goal is to identify specific breaches of the [duty of fairness](https://prime.greeks.live/area/duty-of-fairness/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). Was there evidence of undisclosed criteria being used? Was the scoring inconsistent with the proposal’s content? Was the winning proponent’s bid demonstrably non-compliant?

- **Legal Counsel Engagement and Merits Assessment** ▴ With a preliminary evidence file compiled, experienced administrative law counsel should be engaged. Counsel will assess the strength of the case based on the compiled evidence and the relevant legal precedents. This assessment must include a cost-benefit analysis, weighing the potential legal costs against the likelihood of success and the strategic value of forcing a re-evaluation.

- **Initiating The Application For Judicial Review** ▴ If the merits are strong, the formal legal process begins. This involves filing an application for judicial review with the appropriate court. The application will set out the grounds for the review, the evidence in support, and the specific remedy being sought (e.g. an order to quash the contract award).

![A transparent, multi-faceted component, indicative of an RFQ engine's intricate market microstructure logic, emerges from complex FIX Protocol connectivity. Its sharp edges signify high-fidelity execution and price discovery precision for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimized-for-best-execution.jpg)

## Quantitative Modeling of the Decision to Challenge

The decision to initiate a judicial review is a significant financial and strategic one. A simplified quantitative model can help structure the decision-making process. The following table provides a hypothetical framework for this analysis.

### Table 2 ▴ Hypothetical Cost-Benefit Analysis for Judicial Review

| Variable | Description | Hypothetical Value |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Estimated Legal Costs (C) | Total projected cost of legal fees, court filings, and expert consultations. | $150,000 |
| Probability of Success (P) | Assessed likelihood of the court granting the judicial review, based on legal counsel’s opinion. | 60% |
| Value of Contract (V) | Total estimated profit from winning the contract if the RFP is re-evaluated. | $2,000,000 |
| Probability of Winning on Re-evaluation (W) | Assessed likelihood of winning the contract in a fair, re-evaluated process. | 75% |
| Expected Monetary Value (EMV) | Calculated as (P W V) – C | ($2,000,000 0.60 0.75) – $150,000 = $750,000 |

This model, while simplified, provides a structured way to evaluate the financial viability of a legal challenge. The Expected Monetary Value (EMV) calculation provides a rational basis for the decision, which must also be weighed against non-quantifiable factors such as reputational risk and the strategic importance of the contract.

![A symmetrical, high-tech digital infrastructure depicts an institutional-grade RFQ execution hub. Luminous conduits represent aggregated liquidity for digital asset derivatives, enabling high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-system.jpg)

## Predictive Scenario Analysis a Case Study

Consider a scenario where a municipal government issues a non-binding RFP for waste management services. The RFP clearly states that proposals will be evaluated on a 70/30 basis ▴ 70% for technical approach and 30% for price. Company A, a highly experienced firm, submits a technically superior proposal with a price of $10 million per year.

Company B, the incumbent with a mixed performance record, submits a technically weaker proposal but at a price of $9.5 million. The municipality awards the contract to Company B. During the debriefing, the evaluation committee informs Company A that while their technical score was higher, Company B was awarded the contract because “they are a known entity.”

In this case, Company A has a strong foundation for a judicial review. The public body’s reasoning introduces an undisclosed evaluation criterion ▴ “incumbent preference” or being a “known entity.” This directly contradicts the published 70/30 evaluation matrix and represents a clear breach of the duty of procedural fairness. Company A’s legal team would file an application for judicial review, submitting their proposal, the RFP document, and detailed notes from the debriefing as evidence. The argument would be that the decision was procedurally unfair and unreasonable, as it was based on a criterion that proponents were not informed of and could not address.

The likely remedy would be an order from the court quashing the contract award to Company B and mandating that the municipality re-evaluate the proposals strictly according to the criteria published in the RFP. This execution demonstrates how a disciplined, evidence-based challenge can successfully hold a public body to account, even in a non-binding procurement process.

![A sophisticated, multi-layered trading interface, embodying an Execution Management System EMS, showcases institutional-grade digital asset derivatives execution. Its sleek design implies high-fidelity execution and low-latency processing for RFQ protocols, enabling price discovery and managing multi-leg spreads with capital efficiency across diverse liquidity pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-platform-market-microstructure.jpg)

## References

- Emanuelli, Paul. _Government Procurement, 5th ed._, LexisNexis, 2019.

- Emanuelli, Paul. _The Art of Tendering ▴ A Global Due Diligence Guide._ LexisNexis, 2015.

- Sandori, Paul, and William M. Pigott. _Bidding and Tendering ▴ What is the Law?, 2d ed._, Butterworths, 2000.

- Swan, John, and Jakub Adamski. _Canadian Contract Law, 4th ed._, LexisNexis, 2018.

- Brown, Donald J.M. and John M. Evans. _Judicial Review of Administrative Action in Canada._ Canvasback Publishing, 2020.

- _Murray Purcha & Son Ltd. v. Barriere (District)_, 2019 BCCA 10.

- _Rapiscan Systems Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General)_, 2015 FCA 103.

- _Bot Construction Ltd. v. Ontario (Ministry of Transportation)_, 2009 ONCA 853.

- _M.J.B. Enterprises Ltd. v. Defence Construction (1951) Ltd._, 1 S.C.R. 619.

- _Ron Engineering & Construction (Eastern) Ltd. v. The Queen in right of Ontario et al._, 1 S.C.R. 111.

![Three metallic, circular mechanisms represent a calibrated system for institutional-grade digital asset derivatives trading. The central dial signifies price discovery and algorithmic precision within RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-and-execution-precision.jpg)

## Reflection

The susceptibility of a public body to judicial review, even within the framework of a non-binding RFP, underscores a fundamental principle of public administration. The exercise of public power carries with it an inherent duty of accountability. While procurement documents can be engineered to mitigate commercial liability, they cannot fully dismantle the legal architecture of public law oversight. This reality requires a sophisticated understanding of the operational environment for both public entities and the private firms that engage with them.

For public bodies, the key insight is that procedural discipline is paramount. The use of non-binding language is a tool for flexibility, not a shield for arbitrary decision-making. Adherence to the self-imposed rules of the procurement process is the most effective risk mitigation strategy. For proponents, the knowledge that a path to review exists, separate from contractual remedies, provides a vital check on the power of the state as a commercial actor.

It transforms the RFP from a mere invitation to negotiate into a process with enforceable standards of fairness. Ultimately, the system functions as a mechanism to ensure that the allocation of public contracts is, and is seen to be, a rational and equitable process, thereby preserving the integrity of the procurement system as a whole.

![A polished metallic needle, crowned with a faceted blue gem, precisely inserted into the central spindle of a reflective digital storage platter. This visually represents the high-fidelity execution of institutional digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols, enabling atomic settlement and liquidity aggregation through a sophisticated Prime RFQ intelligence layer for optimal price discovery and alpha generation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-optimization-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-liquidity-aggregation-via-prime-os-intelligence-layer.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/procurement-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Sleek, abstract system interface with glowing green lines symbolizing RFQ pathways and high-fidelity execution. This visualizes market microstructure for institutional digital asset derivatives, emphasizing private quotation and dark liquidity within a Prime RFQ framework, enabling best execution and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocol-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

## Procurement Process

Meaning ▴ The Procurement Process, within the systems architecture and operational framework of a crypto-native or crypto-investing institution, defines the structured sequence of activities involved in acquiring goods, services, or digital assets from external vendors or liquidity providers. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/administrative-law/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A stylized depiction of institutional-grade digital asset derivatives RFQ execution. A central glowing liquidity pool for price discovery is precisely pierced by an algorithmic trading path, symbolizing high-fidelity execution and slippage minimization within market microstructure via a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-high-fidelity-execution-1.jpg)

## Administrative Law

Meaning ▴ Administrative Law, within the domain of crypto and decentralized systems, refers to the body of public law governing the actions and decision-making processes of governmental agencies that oversee digital asset markets. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/procedural-fairness/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A specialized hardware component, showcasing a robust metallic heat sink and intricate circuit board, symbolizes a Prime RFQ dedicated hardware module for institutional digital asset derivatives. It embodies market microstructure enabling high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols for block trade and multi-leg spread](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/prime-os-dedicated-hardware-for-institutional-rfq-execution.jpg)

## Procedural Fairness

Meaning ▴ Procedural Fairness, within the context of crypto markets and their underlying systems architecture, refers to the unwavering adherence to transparent, unbiased, and consistently applied rules and processes in the handling, execution, and settlement of digital asset transactions. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/judicial-review/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Polished concentric metallic and glass components represent an advanced Prime RFQ for institutional digital asset derivatives. It visualizes high-fidelity execution, price discovery, and order book dynamics within market microstructure, enabling efficient RFQ protocols for block trades](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-prime-os-precision.jpg)

## Judicial Review

Meaning ▴ Judicial Review refers to the process by which courts examine the actions of the legislative and executive branches of government to determine their legality and consistency with constitutional or statutory provisions. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/process-contract/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A central, intricate blue mechanism, evocative of an Execution Management System EMS or Prime RFQ, embodies algorithmic trading. Transparent rings signify dynamic liquidity pools and price discovery for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-framework-driving-high-fidelity-rfq-execution-and-optimized-market-microstructure-for-capital-efficiency.jpg)

## Process Contract

Meaning ▴ A Process Contract, in the context of systems architecture within crypto operations and institutional trading, refers to a formal, agreed-upon specification that defines the sequential steps, data inputs, expected outputs, and conditional logic governing a particular business process or interaction. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/contract-a/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract geometric design illustrating a central RFQ aggregation hub for institutional digital asset derivatives. Radiating lines symbolize high-fidelity execution via smart order routing across dark pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-high-fidelity-execution-architecture.jpg)

## Contract A

Meaning ▴ In the context of a Request for Quote (RFQ) process, "Contract A" signifies the preliminary, legally binding agreement formed when a dealer submits a firm, executable price quote in response to a client's specific request. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/non-binding-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A multi-faceted algorithmic execution engine, reflective with teal components, navigates a cratered market microstructure. It embodies a Principal's operational framework for high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives, optimizing capital efficiency, best execution via RFQ protocols in a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/advanced-rfq-protocol-engine-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

## Non-Binding Rfp

Meaning ▴ A Non-Binding RFP (Request for Proposal) in the crypto institutional context serves as a preliminary informational gathering and vendor assessment tool, wherein an entity solicits detailed proposals for digital asset services or infrastructure without incurring any legal obligation to accept or proceed with any of the submitted offers. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-do-regulatory-bodies-view-best-execution-for-assets-without-public-prices/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A dark, textured module with a glossy top and silver button, featuring active RFQ protocol status indicators. This represents a Principal's operational framework for high-fidelity execution of institutional digital asset derivatives, optimizing atomic settlement and capital efficiency within market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-interface-1.jpg)

## Public Bodies

Regulatory bodies require firms to prove best execution for illiquid assets through a documented, systematic process of competitive price discovery. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/public-procurement/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A dark, reflective surface displays a luminous green line, symbolizing a high-fidelity RFQ protocol channel within a Crypto Derivatives OS. This signifies precise price discovery for digital asset derivatives, ensuring atomic settlement and optimizing portfolio margin](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-pathway-optimizing-principal-liquidity-and-capital-efficiency.jpg)

## Public Procurement

Meaning ▴ Public Procurement, when applied to the domain of crypto technology, refers to the structured process by which governmental bodies and public sector organizations acquire digital assets, blockchain-based services, or related infrastructure. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/lost-profits/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precision algorithmic core with layered rings on a reflective surface signifies high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives. It optimizes RFQ protocols for price discovery, channeling dark liquidity within a robust Prime RFQ for capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimized-for-precision.jpg)

## Lost Profits

Meaning ▴ Lost Profits refer to the monetary damages sought in legal or contractual disputes, representing the net earnings or economic benefit that a party would have reasonably gained had an adverse event, such as a breach of contract or operational failure, not occurred. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/legitimate-expectation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Geometric planes and transparent spheres represent complex market microstructure. A central luminous core signifies efficient price discovery and atomic settlement via RFQ protocol](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-4.jpg)

## Legitimate Expectation

Meaning ▴ Legitimate Expectation is a legal principle where an individual or entity can reasonably expect certain treatment or outcomes based on a public body's prior representations, policies, or established practices. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/duty-of-fairness/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, modular institutional grade system with glowing teal conduits represents advanced RFQ protocol pathways. This illustrates high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives, facilitating private quotation and efficient liquidity aggregation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-ecosystem-powering-high-fidelity-rfq-execution-and-optimal-liquidity-discovery.jpg)

## Duty of Fairness

Meaning ▴ The duty of fairness, in a financial regulatory and ethical context, mandates that market participants, especially those acting as intermediaries, fiduciaries, or liquidity providers, must treat all clients and counterparties equitably and impartially, without exhibiting undue preference or engaging in discriminatory practices. </a>

**Tags:** [Administrative Law](https://options.greeks.live/area/administrative-law/), [Government Contracts](https://options.greeks.live/area/government-contracts/), [Public Procurement](https://options.greeks.live/area/public-procurement/), [Procurement Law](https://options.greeks.live/area/procurement-law/), [Procurement Process](https://options.greeks.live/area/procurement-process/), [Judicial Review](https://options.greeks.live/area/judicial-review/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [What Are the Legal Consequences of Non-Compliance in a Binding Rfp for Both the Issuer and the Bidder?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-legal-consequences-of-non-compliance-in-a-binding-rfp-for-both-the-issuer-and-the-bidder/)
![A sophisticated dark-hued institutional-grade digital asset derivatives platform interface, featuring a glowing aperture symbolizing active RFQ price discovery and high-fidelity execution. The integrated intelligence layer facilitates atomic settlement and multi-leg spread processing, optimizing market microstructure for prime brokerage operations and capital efficiency. This represents a robust crypto derivatives OS.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-crypto-derivatives-rfq-engine-intelligence-layer.jpg)

Non-compliance in a binding RFP breaches a process contract, exposing the issuer to damage claims and the bidder to disqualification.

- 
### [How Do Privilege Clauses in a Non-Binding Rfp Affect a Proponent’s Legal Rights?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-privilege-clauses-in-a-non-binding-rfp-affect-a-proponents-legal-rights/)
![An intricate, high-precision mechanism symbolizes an Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives RFQ protocol. Its sleek off-white casing protects the core market microstructure, while the teal-edged component signifies high-fidelity execution and optimal price discovery. A detailed circular dial suggests real-time implied volatility and quantitative analysis for portfolio margin.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-market-microstructure-optimization.jpg)

Privilege clauses in non-binding RFPs grant owners discretion, but this power is constrained by an implied duty of fairness to proponents.

- 
### [What Are the Potential Damages for a Breach of the Duty of Fairness in a Procurement Process?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-potential-damages-for-a-breach-of-the-duty-of-fairness-in-a-procurement-process/)
![A precise metallic and transparent teal mechanism symbolizes the intricate market microstructure of a Prime RFQ. It facilitates high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives, optimizing RFQ protocols for private quotation, aggregated inquiry, and block trade management, ensuring best execution.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/advanced-principal-trading-systems-driving-high-fidelity-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-protocols.jpg)

A breach of procurement fairness triggers quantifiable damages, including lost profits and bid costs, to restore market integrity.

- 
### [Does the Legal Standard for Suing Change If the RFP Is from a Government Entity versus a Private Company?](https://options.greeks.live/question/does-the-legal-standard-for-suing-change-if-the-rfp-is-from-a-government-entity-versus-a-private-company/)
![A multi-faceted algorithmic execution engine, reflective with teal components, navigates a cratered market microstructure. It embodies a Principal's operational framework for high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives, optimizing capital efficiency, best execution via RFQ protocols in a Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/advanced-rfq-protocol-engine-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

The legal standard for suing over an RFP is fundamentally altered by the doctrine of sovereign immunity when the issuing entity is a government body.

- 
### [Can a Transparent Rfp Process Reduce the Likelihood of Legal Challenges from Unsuccessful Bidders?](https://options.greeks.live/question/can-a-transparent-rfp-process-reduce-the-likelihood-of-legal-challenges-from-unsuccessful-bidders/)
![Curved, segmented surfaces in blue, beige, and teal, with a transparent cylindrical element against a dark background. This abstractly depicts volatility surfaces and market microstructure, facilitating high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols for digital asset derivatives, enabling price discovery and revealing latent liquidity for institutional trading.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/optimized-rfq-protocol-dynamics-for-institutional-crypto-derivatives.jpg)

A transparent RFP process systematically reduces legal challenges by substituting ambiguity and perceived bias with a defensible, auditable system.

- 
### [What Are the Key Differences in Legal Recourse for a Vendor in a Binding versus a Non-Binding Rfp Process?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-in-legal-recourse-for-a-vendor-in-a-binding-versus-a-non-binding-rfp-process/)
![Wah Centre Hong Kong](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg)

In a binding RFP, a vendor's recourse is a breach of contract claim for lost profits; in a non-binding RFP, it is an equitable claim for reliance costs.

- 
### [What Are the Key Differences between a Binding and a Non-Binding RFP?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-between-a-binding-and-a-non-binding-rfp/)
![Abstract system interface on a global data sphere, illustrating a sophisticated RFQ protocol for institutional digital asset derivatives. The glowing circuits represent market microstructure and high-fidelity execution within a Prime RFQ intelligence layer, facilitating price discovery and capital efficiency across liquidity pools.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-prime-os.jpg)

A binding RFP creates an enforceable process contract upon bid submission; a non-binding RFP initiates a flexible negotiation.

- 
### [What Is the “Contract A/Contract B” Framework and How Does It Impact the Rfp Process?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-contract-a-contract-b-framework-and-how-does-it-impact-the-rfp-process/)
![Precisely engineered abstract structure featuring translucent and opaque blades converging at a central hub. This embodies institutional RFQ protocol for digital asset derivatives, representing dynamic liquidity aggregation, high-fidelity execution, and complex multi-leg spread price discovery.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-multi-leg-execution-protocol.jpg)

The "Contract A/Contract B" framework imposes a two-stage contract system on RFPs, creating a binding process contract (A) and a final work contract (B).

- 
### [How Can an Rfp Issuer Protect Itself from Allegations of Bad Faith during the Bidding Process?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-rfp-issuer-protect-itself-from-allegations-of-bad-faith-during-the-bidding-process/)
![A polished Prime RFQ surface frames a glowing blue sphere, symbolizing a deep liquidity pool. Its precision fins suggest algorithmic price discovery and high-fidelity execution within an RFQ protocol. This system optimizes institutional digital asset derivatives trading, ensuring capital efficiency and minimizing slippage.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-intelligence.jpg)

An RFP issuer protects itself from bad faith allegations by architecting a transparent, rigid, and meticulously documented procurement system.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "Can a Public Body Be Subject to Judicial Review for a Non-Binding Rfp Process?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/can-a-public-body-be-subject-to-judicial-review-for-a-non-binding-rfp-process/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/can-a-public-body-be-subject-to-judicial-review-for-a-non-binding-rfp-process/"
    },
    "headline": "Can a Public Body Be Subject to Judicial Review for a Non-Binding Rfp Process? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "A public body's non-binding RFP is subject to judicial review, as public law duties of fairness and reasonableness persist beyond contractual disclaimers. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/can-a-public-body-be-subject-to-judicial-review-for-a-non-binding-rfp-process/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-08T15:03:05+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-10-28T19:15:11+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-microstructure-price-discovery-optimization-prime-os-intelligence-layer.jpg",
        "caption": "A sophisticated conical form, featuring a luminous mint-green tip and a polished grey body, symbolizes the Prime RFQ Intelligence Layer for institutional digital asset derivatives. This visual metaphor encapsulates high-fidelity execution and algorithmic trading strategies, enabling pre-trade analytics and post-trade reporting through optimized RFQ protocols. It represents a precise instrument for alpha generation, navigating volatility surface dynamics, ensuring best execution and systemic risk mitigation within evolving market microstructure for superior capital efficiency."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Administrative Law",
        "Certiorari",
        "Contract A",
        "Duty of Fairness",
        "Government Contracts",
        "Judicial Review",
        "Legitimate Expectation",
        "Lost Profits",
        "Non-Binding RFP",
        "Procedural Fairness",
        "Process Contract",
        "Procurement Law",
        "Procurement Process",
        "Public Procurement",
        "Standard of Reasonableness"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/can-a-public-body-be-subject-to-judicial-review-for-a-non-binding-rfp-process/
