# Can a Single Legal Case Involve Both Objective and Subjective Standards for Different Claims? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-13
**Categories:** Question

---

![Visualizing a complex Institutional RFQ ecosystem, angular forms represent multi-leg spread execution pathways and dark liquidity integration. A sharp, precise point symbolizes high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives, highlighting atomic settlement within a Prime RFQ framework](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution-1.jpg)

![A robust, dark metallic platform, indicative of an institutional-grade execution management system. Its precise, machined components suggest high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-platform-high-fidelity-price-discovery-and-atomic-settlement-infrastructure.jpg)

## Concept

A legal framework operates as a complex system for resolving disputes, and at its core lies the critical function of measurement. To adjudicate a claim, a court requires a calibrated instrument, a standard against which facts and actions can be evaluated. The system’s architecture does not rely on a single, universal gauge.

Instead, it deploys two distinct types of measurement protocols, the objective and the [subjective standard](https://prime.greeks.live/area/subjective-standard/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), each designed for a specific purpose. A single legal case can, and frequently does, incorporate both of these protocols to assess different claims, creating a multidimensional analytical field that the procedural apparatus of the court is designed to process.

The [objective standard](https://prime.greeks.live/area/objective-standard/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is the system’s externalized, community-facing metric. It assesses conduct by comparing it to that of a hypothetical construct ▴ the “[reasonable person](https://prime.greeks.live/question/can-an-investors-own-status-as-a-qualified-eligible-person-affect-a-fund-managers-cta-registration-requirements/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite).” This standard is not concerned with the internal state, personal history, or unique cognitive wiring of the individual defendant. Its focus is on a generalized, predictable norm of behavior that a community is entitled to expect from its members. For instance, in a claim of negligence arising from a traffic accident, the inquiry is not whether the driver genuinely believed they were proceeding with caution.

The determinative question is whether a reasonably prudent driver, operating under the same conditions, would have acted in the same manner. This protocol provides a stable and predictable foundation for regulating common interactions, from driving a car to performing a surgical procedure.

![A dark, robust sphere anchors a precise, glowing teal and metallic mechanism with an upward-pointing spire. This symbolizes institutional digital asset derivatives execution, embodying RFQ protocol precision, liquidity aggregation, and high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-1.jpg)

## The Internal State as a Determinant

In contrast, the subjective standard functions as an internal probe, designed to ascertain an individual’s actual state of mind at a specific moment. This protocol is deployed when the law deems the actor’s personal intent, knowledge, or belief to be the dispositive element of a claim or defense. A claim of fraud, for example, hinges on proving that the defendant knowingly made a false statement with the intent to deceive. It is their specific, internal awareness and purpose that constitutes the wrongful act.

The court must attempt to reconstruct the defendant’s mental state, using evidence to infer what they actually knew or intended. This standard is inherently more individualized and less predictable, as it turns on the unique, unobservable cognitive and emotional state of a single person.

> A legal case with multiple claims functions like a diagnostic system, applying broad, population-level tests for some issues and highly specific, individualized probes for others.

The coexistence of these standards within one lawsuit is a testament to the system’s design flexibility. A dispute originating from a single event can easily bifurcate into separate lines of inquiry. Consider a scenario where a patient suffers harm after a medical procedure. The patient might bring a claim for medical malpractice, which is governed by an objective standard ▴ did the surgeon perform with the skill and care of a reasonably competent surgeon in that specialty?

Simultaneously, the patient could allege that the surgeon committed battery by performing a procedure to which the patient did not consent. A valid consent analysis often involves a subjective component ▴ did this particular patient receive and understand the information necessary to make an informed choice? Here, the legal action proceeds on parallel tracks, with the court applying a community standard to the question of skill and an individualized standard to the question of consent, all within the same case.

![A diagonal metallic framework supports two dark circular elements with blue rims, connected by a central oval interface. This represents an institutional-grade RFQ protocol for digital asset derivatives, facilitating block trade execution, high-fidelity execution, dark liquidity, and atomic settlement on a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/optimized-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-system-rfq-protocols-and-atomic-settlement.jpg)

![A precise teal instrument, symbolizing high-fidelity execution and price discovery, intersects angular market microstructure elements. These structured planes represent a Principal's operational framework for digital asset derivatives, resting upon a reflective liquidity pool for aggregated inquiry via RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-platform-underpinning-rfq-protocol-liquidity-aggregation-and-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Strategy

The presence of both objective and subjective standards within a single litigation is not merely a doctrinal curiosity; it represents a strategic landscape with distinct pathways, risks, and opportunities. For a litigant, understanding the architectural [differences between these standards](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-differences-between-the-cover-1-and-cover-2-standards/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is fundamental to designing an effective case strategy, from the initial pleading to the presentation of evidence at trial. The choice of which claims to pursue dictates the very nature of the information that will be required, the motions that will be filed, and the narrative that will be constructed for the fact-finder.

A legal team’s initial strategic decision point involves claim selection. Pleading claims with different standards, such as negligence (objective) and [fraudulent misrepresentation](https://prime.greeks.live/area/fraudulent-misrepresentation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (subjective), can be a powerful tactic. This approach creates multiple potential avenues to a successful outcome. If the evidence of the defendant’s [internal state](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-can-a-trading-system-ensure-state-consistency-between-its-internal-records-and-exchange-reported-fills/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) of mind proves elusive, the objective negligence claim may still prevail based on observable actions.

Conversely, if the defendant’s conduct was arguably reasonable on its face, proving a malicious or deceptive subjective intent could establish liability where an [objective claim](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-should-an-investor-verify-a-fund-managers-claim-to-a-cta-exemption-under-cftc-rules/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) alone might fail. This strategic redundancy builds resilience into the case structure.

![A glowing blue module with a metallic core and extending probe is set into a pristine white surface. This symbolizes an active institutional RFQ protocol, enabling precise price discovery and high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocol-driving-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-high-fidelity-execution-precise-price-discovery-for-block-trades-and-capital-efficiency.jpg)

## Comparative Architecture of Legal Standards

The operational differences between these standards are stark. An effective litigation strategy must be built upon a clear perception of these distinctions, as they directly influence every subsequent phase of the legal process. The following table provides a comparative analysis of their core architectural components.

| Component | Objective Standard | Subjective Standard |
| --- | --- | --- |

![A sleek blue and white mechanism with a focused lens symbolizes Pre-Trade Analytics for Digital Asset Derivatives. A glowing turquoise sphere represents a Block Trade within a Liquidity Pool, demonstrating High-Fidelity Execution via RFQ protocol for Price Discovery in Dark Pool Market Microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/advanced-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system-for-optimal-price-discovery-and-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Discovery and Evidentiary Strategy

The discovery phase of litigation diverges significantly based on the operative standard. For an objective claim like [breach of contract](https://prime.greeks.live/area/breach-of-contract/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), discovery focuses on collecting external proof ▴ the contract itself, performance records, and industry standards. For a [subjective claim](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-should-an-investor-verify-a-fund-managers-claim-to-a-cta-exemption-under-cftc-rules/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) like intentional infliction of emotional distress, discovery becomes a probe into the defendant’s mind. This involves deposing the defendant to question their motives and knowledge, seeking internal communications that might reveal their intent, and exploring their history for patterns of behavior.

- **For Objective Claims** ▴ The goal is to build a factual record of what happened and to establish the prevailing standard of care or conduct. A litigant will request documents like safety manuals, transaction logs, or architectural plans. They will depose expert witnesses who can testify about what a “reasonable” actor would have done. 

- **For Subjective Claims** ▴ The objective is to find evidence that illuminates the defendant’s internal state. Here, a litigant will seek text messages, emails, and internal memos. Deposition questions will be designed to challenge the defendant’s stated reasons for their actions and to expose inconsistencies that suggest a hidden motive or knowledge. 

This dual-track approach has profound implications for settlement strategy. A strong objective case with clear evidence of a breach of a standard of care creates pressure for an early settlement. A case centered on a subjective standard, with its inherent uncertainties about what a jury might infer, can lead to more protracted and contentious negotiations, as both sides are gambling on their ability to persuade a jury about an unobservable mental state.

![A sleek, multi-component device with a dark blue base and beige bands culminates in a sophisticated top mechanism. This precision instrument symbolizes a Crypto Derivatives OS facilitating RFQ protocol for block trade execution, ensuring high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement for institutional-grade digital asset derivatives across diverse liquidity pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/advanced-mechanism-for-principal-trading-firm-rfq-protocols-and-high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

![A central blue sphere, representing a Liquidity Pool, balances on a white dome, the Prime RFQ. Perpendicular beige and teal arms, embodying RFQ protocols and Multi-Leg Spread strategies, extend to four peripheral blue elements](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-framework.jpg)

## Execution

Executing a legal strategy in a case with mixed objective and subjective standards requires a disciplined, systems-based approach. The litigation process must be managed as a coherent whole, ensuring that the evidence and arguments for each claim are developed without creating internal contradictions. This section provides a framework for the operational execution of such a case, from procedural implementation to a detailed scenario analysis, demonstrating how these distinct [legal standards](https://prime.greeks.live/area/legal-standards/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) are processed through the machinery of the court system.

![A complex, intersecting arrangement of sleek, multi-colored blades illustrates institutional-grade digital asset derivatives trading. This visual metaphor represents a sophisticated Prime RFQ facilitating RFQ protocols, aggregating dark liquidity, and enabling high-fidelity execution for multi-leg spreads, optimizing capital efficiency and mitigating counterparty risk](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/sophisticated-multi-asset-rfq-architecture-visualizing-institutional-digital-derivatives-execution-liquidity-aggregation-and-prime-os-orchestration-for-high-fidelity-performance.jpg)

## The Operational Playbook

Managing a dual-standard case requires careful sequencing and resource allocation. The following provides a procedural guide for navigating the key phases of litigation, ensuring that both the objective and subjective components of the case are fully developed.

- **Pleading Phase** ▴ The initial complaint must be drafted with precision. Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a party can plead claims in the alternative. The complaint should set out each claim in a separate count, clearly articulating the elements for the objective claim (e.g. duty, breach, causation, damages for [negligence](https://prime.greeks.live/area/negligence/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)) and the subjective claim (e.g. knowing misrepresentation, intent to induce reliance for fraud). This isolates each line of inquiry from the outset. 

- **Initial Disclosures** ▴ Parties must exchange core information early in the case. The disclosures should be organized to address both types of claims. For the objective claim, this may include contracts or accident reports. For the subjective claim, this could involve identifying key individuals likely to have knowledge of the defendant’s state of mind. 

- **Discovery Planning** ▴ A comprehensive discovery plan is essential. This plan should include two parallel workstreams. The first workstream focuses on gathering objective evidence through requests for production of documents and depositions of third-party experts. The second workstream targets subjective evidence through carefully crafted interrogatories and deposition questioning of the opposing party and their close associates. 

- **Motion Practice** ▴ The standards diverge most sharply at the [summary judgment](https://prime.greeks.live/area/summary-judgment/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) stage. A defendant may move for summary judgment, arguing that no genuine dispute of material fact exists. For an objective claim, this motion will succeed if the undisputed evidence shows the defendant’s conduct met the reasonable person standard. For a subjective claim, this motion is harder to win, as questions of intent and credibility are classic jury questions. The legal team must be prepared to argue that the circumstantial evidence of intent is strong enough to require a trial. 

- **Trial Presentation** ▴ At trial, the narrative for each claim must be presented clearly to the jury. The objective claim is presented as a story of a failure to meet a community standard. The subjective claim is presented as a story of a person’s wrongful state of mind. Jury instructions must be carefully drafted to explain the different standards the jury must apply to each count. 

![A digitally rendered, split toroidal structure reveals intricate internal circuitry and swirling data flows, representing the intelligence layer of a Prime RFQ. This visualizes dynamic RFQ protocols, algorithmic execution, and real-time market microstructure analysis for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-core-processing-architecture-visualized-through-interconnected-liquidity-networks.jpg)

## Evidentiary Frameworks and Proof Architectures

The successful execution of a mixed-standard case depends on systematically mapping evidence to the specific elements of each claim. Different pieces of evidence serve different functions within the overall case architecture. The table below illustrates how evidence in a hypothetical construction dispute would be categorized and deployed.

| Evidence Type | Supports Objective Claim (Breach of Contract) | Supports Subjective Claim (Fraud) | Primary Function |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

![A metallic disc, reminiscent of a sophisticated market interface, features two precise pointers radiating from a glowing central hub. This visualizes RFQ protocols driving price discovery within institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-price-discovery.jpg)

## Predictive Scenario Analysis

Let us consider a detailed case study. A tech startup, InnovateCorp, hires a software development firm, CodePerfect, to build a custom e-commerce platform. The contract specifies that the platform must handle 10,000 concurrent users and integrate with a specific inventory management system.

After delivery, the platform repeatedly crashes under loads of just 1,000 users, and the inventory integration is faulty. InnovateCorp sues CodePerfect.

InnovateCorp’s lawyers file a complaint with two counts. Count I is for Breach of Contract. This claim is governed by an objective standard. The questions are ▴ Did the platform as delivered meet the specifications in the contract?

Did CodePerfect perform its work with the skill and care of a reasonably competent software development firm? To prove this, InnovateCorp’s lawyers will gather evidence like the written contract, performance logs from the failed platform, and testimony from a software engineering expert who can analyze the code and explain why it fails to meet professional standards.

> The procedural rules of the court system are the operational protocols that allow for the parallel processing of different legal standards within a single, unified action.

Count II is for Fraudulent Inducement. This claim is governed by a subjective standard. InnovateCorp alleges that during sales negotiations, CodePerfect’s CEO knowingly misrepresented that their team had prior experience building platforms of this scale, when in fact they had never done so. To prove this, InnovateCorp’s lawyers need to establish the CEO’s state of mind.

Their discovery will focus on CodePerfect’s internal records. They will depose the CEO and the lead developers, asking about their prior projects. They will request internal emails and project management records from the time of the sales negotiations. Suppose they uncover an email from the CEO to the sales team saying, “They’re asking about high-concurrency experience.

Just tell them we’ve handled it before. We need this contract.” This email is the critical piece of evidence for the subjective claim, as it directly reveals a knowing and intentional misrepresentation.

At the summary judgment stage, CodePerfect might argue that they made a good faith effort and that the technical problems were unforeseeable, attempting to defeat the objective breach of contract claim. However, the subjective fraud claim is almost certain to survive summary judgment because the email creates a clear factual dispute about the CEO’s intent. The case proceeds to trial. The jury will be given two sets of instructions.

For Count I, they will be asked to decide if CodePerfect’s work met the objective standard of a reasonable software firm. For Count II, they will be asked to decide if the CEO subjectively knew he was lying to get the contract. The jury could find for InnovateCorp on both counts, on just one, or on neither, depending on how they weigh the evidence for each distinct standard.

![A sleek, metallic control mechanism with a luminous teal-accented sphere symbolizes high-fidelity execution within institutional digital asset derivatives trading. Its robust design represents Prime RFQ infrastructure enabling RFQ protocols for optimal price discovery, liquidity aggregation, and low-latency connectivity in algorithmic trading environments](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-control-for-optimal-market-microstructure-precision.jpg)

## Doctrinal Integration and Procedural Architecture

The ability of the American legal system to handle these mixed-standard cases is a function of its procedural architecture. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (and their state counterparts) provide the “operating system” that allows these different analytical models to run concurrently. Rule 8(d) expressly permits a party to set out two or more statements of a claim alternatively or hypothetically. This rule is the foundational architectural component that enables the filing of a mixed-standard complaint.

The broad discovery rules, particularly Rule 26, allow parties to obtain any nonprivileged matter that is relevant to any party’s claim or defense, accommodating the need to gather both external evidence for objective claims and internal, state-of-mind evidence for subjective ones. Finally, Rule 56, governing summary judgment, provides the mechanism for filtering out claims. Its structure implicitly recognizes that cases turning on objective facts are more amenable to early resolution than cases turning on subjective intent, which often require a jury to assess credibility. This procedural framework ensures that the system can process the full complexity of a dispute without forcing it into a single, inadequate analytical mold.

![A luminous teal sphere, representing a digital asset derivative private quotation, rests on an RFQ protocol channel. A metallic element signifies the algorithmic trading engine and robust portfolio margin](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-microstructure-optimizing-prime-os.jpg)

## References

- Wright, R. George. “Objective and Subjective Tests in the Law.” _University of New Hampshire Law Review_, vol. 16, no. 1, 2017, pp. 121-146.

- Paciocco, David M. “Subjective and Objective Standards of Fault For Offenses and Defenses.” _Saskatchewan Law Review_, vol. 59, 1995, p. 271.

- Miller, Alan D. and Ronen Perry. “The Reasonable Person.” _New York University Law Review_, vol. 87, 2012, p. 323.

- Prosser, William L. and W. Page Keeton. _Prosser and Keeton on the Law of Torts_. 5th ed. West Publishing, 1984.

- Farnsworth, E. Allan. _Farnsworth on Contracts_. 3rd ed. Aspen Publishers, 2004.

- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Cornell Law School Legal Information Institute.

- Restatement (Second) of Torts. American Law Institute.

![A central metallic bar, representing an RFQ block trade, pivots through translucent geometric planes symbolizing dynamic liquidity pools and multi-leg spread strategies. This illustrates a Principal's operational framework for high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement within a sophisticated Crypto Derivatives OS, optimizing private quotation workflows](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-facilitating-high-fidelity-price-discovery-and-optimal-capital-efficiency-within-advanced-market-microstructure.jpg)

## Reflection

An understanding of the dual-standard architecture within the legal system moves one beyond a static view of legal doctrines into a dynamic appreciation of litigation as a system of structured analysis. The presence of both objective and subjective inquiries within a single case is not a design flaw; it is the system’s method for achieving a higher resolution image of a dispute. It acknowledges that a single event can contain multiple layers of legal significance ▴ one layer defined by public norms and another defined by private intent. The true strategic advantage lies not in merely recognizing that these two standards exist, but in mastering the operational protocols required to navigate them simultaneously.

This involves architecting a case that can withstand scrutiny on both levels, developing evidentiary streams for each, and presenting a coherent narrative to a fact-finder that respects the distinct logic of each standard. Ultimately, the framework is a tool, and its most effective use comes from a profound understanding of its design, its components, and its capacity to process complexity.

![Angular dark planes frame luminous turquoise pathways converging centrally. This visualizes institutional digital asset derivatives market microstructure, highlighting RFQ protocols for private quotation and high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-rfq-protocols-for-institutional-digital-assets.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/subjective-standard/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Precision-engineered device with central lens, symbolizing Prime RFQ Intelligence Layer for institutional digital asset derivatives. Facilitates RFQ protocol optimization, driving price discovery for Bitcoin options and Ethereum futures](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-institutional-rfq-protocol-engine-for-digital-asset-derivatives-options-trading.jpg)

## Subjective Standard

Meaning ▴ A Subjective Standard defines a criterion or benchmark for operational decision-making that relies on qualitative assessment, expert judgment, or discretionary input rather than exclusively on pre-defined, quantitative rules or deterministic algorithms. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/objective-standard/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A transparent sphere, bisected by dark rods, symbolizes an RFQ protocol's core. This represents multi-leg spread execution within a high-fidelity market microstructure for institutional grade digital asset derivatives, ensuring optimal price discovery and capital efficiency via Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Objective Standard

Meaning ▴ An Objective Standard denotes a quantifiable, verifiable metric or criterion established independently of subjective judgment, utilized for consistent evaluation of system performance, operational compliance, or market state. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/can-an-investors-own-status-as-a-qualified-eligible-person-affect-a-fund-managers-cta-registration-requirements/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A polished metallic needle, crowned with a faceted blue gem, precisely inserted into the central spindle of a reflective digital storage platter. This visually represents the high-fidelity execution of institutional digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols, enabling atomic settlement and liquidity aggregation through a sophisticated Prime RFQ intelligence layer for optimal price discovery and alpha generation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-optimization-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-liquidity-aggregation-via-prime-os-intelligence-layer.jpg)

## Reasonable Person

An investor's QEP status enables a CTA to claim exemptions from major disclosure and reporting rules. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-differences-between-the-cover-1-and-cover-2-standards/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A gold-hued precision instrument with a dark, sharp interface engages a complex circuit board, symbolizing high-fidelity execution within institutional market microstructure. This visual metaphor represents a sophisticated RFQ protocol facilitating private quotation and atomic settlement for digital asset derivatives, optimizing capital efficiency and mitigating counterparty risk](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-grade-precision-execution-engine-optimizing-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-within-market-microstructure.jpg)

## Differences between These Standards

Cover 1 centralizes deep-field risk with one safety to enable aggressive man coverage; Cover 2 distributes it with two safeties for zone-based security. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/fraudulent-misrepresentation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A central metallic RFQ engine anchors radiating segmented panels, symbolizing diverse liquidity pools and market segments. Varying shades denote distinct execution venues within the complex market microstructure, facilitating price discovery for institutional digital asset derivatives with minimal slippage and latency via high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principals-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-nexus.jpg)

## Fraudulent Misrepresentation

Meaning ▴ Fraudulent Misrepresentation defines the deliberate act of presenting a false statement of material fact with the intent to induce another party to act upon it, resulting in a quantifiable detriment. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-can-a-trading-system-ensure-state-consistency-between-its-internal-records-and-exchange-reported-fills/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A curved grey surface anchors a translucent blue disk, pierced by a sharp green financial instrument and two silver stylus elements. This visualizes a precise RFQ protocol for institutional digital asset derivatives, enabling liquidity aggregation, high-fidelity execution, price discovery, and algorithmic trading within market microstructure via a Principal's operational framework](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-high-fidelity-execution-via-rfq-protocols-optimizing-market-microstructure-and-price-discovery.jpg)

## Internal State

A trading system ensures state consistency through a layered defense of idempotent architecture, protocol-level validation, and continuous, multi-frequency reconciliation against exchange data. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-should-an-investor-verify-a-fund-managers-claim-to-a-cta-exemption-under-cftc-rules/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precise lens-like module, symbolizing high-fidelity execution and market microstructure insight, rests on a sharp blade, representing optimal smart order routing. Curved surfaces depict distinct liquidity pools within an institutional-grade Prime RFQ, enabling efficient RFQ for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-via-rfq-protocols.jpg)

## Objective Claim

Verify a fund manager's CTA exemption by cross-referencing their claim against the NFA's BASIC database and demanding direct documentary evidence. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/breach-of-contract/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Central reflective hub with radiating metallic rods and layered translucent blades. This visualizes an RFQ protocol engine, symbolizing the Prime RFQ orchestrating multi-dealer liquidity for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-digital-asset-rfq-execution-and-liquidity-management.jpg)

## Breach of Contract

Meaning ▴ A breach of contract, within the context of institutional digital asset derivatives, represents a critical deviation from the predefined operational parameters or agreed-upon execution logic embedded within a financial protocol or smart contract. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-should-an-investor-verify-a-fund-managers-claim-to-a-cta-exemption-under-cftc-rules/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A polished, cut-open sphere reveals a sharp, luminous green prism, symbolizing high-fidelity execution within a Principal's operational framework. The reflective interior denotes market microstructure insights and latent liquidity in digital asset derivatives, embodying RFQ protocols for alpha generation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-engine-prime-os-alpha-intelligence.jpg)

## Subjective Claim

Verify a fund manager's CTA exemption by cross-referencing their claim against the NFA's BASIC database and demanding direct documentary evidence. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/legal-standards/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Angularly connected segments portray distinct liquidity pools and RFQ protocols. A speckled grey section highlights granular market microstructure and aggregated inquiry complexities for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-efficiency.jpg)

## Legal Standards

Meaning ▴ Legal Standards represent the codified requirements and established benchmarks derived from statutes, regulations, and judicial interpretations that govern the operation, conduct, and reporting of activities within financial markets, particularly those involving institutional digital asset derivatives. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/negligence/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precise mechanical instrument with intersecting transparent and opaque hands, representing the intricate market microstructure of institutional digital asset derivatives. This visual metaphor highlights dynamic price discovery and bid-ask spread dynamics within RFQ protocols, emphasizing high-fidelity execution and latent liquidity through a robust Prime RFQ for atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineering-driving-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-across-advanced-rfq-protocols-and-prime-brokerage-frameworks.jpg)

## Negligence

Meaning ▴ Negligence, within the operational framework of institutional digital asset derivatives, represents a failure to adhere to the established standard of care in the design, implementation, or oversight of a system, leading directly to an adverse financial or operational outcome. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/summary-judgment/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sophisticated metallic mechanism with integrated translucent teal pathways on a dark background. This abstract visualizes the intricate market microstructure of an institutional digital asset derivatives platform, specifically the RFQ engine facilitating private quotation and block trade execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/systemic-framework-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-price-discovery-and-atomic-settlement.jpg)

## Summary Judgment

Meaning ▴ Summary Judgment, within a robust financial operating system, refers to a procedural mechanism designed for the expedited resolution of specific, pre-defined conditions or disputes where material facts are deemed undisputed, thereby obviating the need for extensive, resource-intensive arbitration or full-scale litigation. </a>

**Tags:** [Legal Standards](https://options.greeks.live/area/legal-standards/), [Summary Judgment](https://options.greeks.live/area/summary-judgment/), [Burden of Proof](https://options.greeks.live/area/burden-of-proof/), [Breach of Contract](https://options.greeks.live/area/breach-of-contract/), [Subjective Standard](https://options.greeks.live/area/subjective-standard/), [Reasonable Person Standard](https://options.greeks.live/area/reasonable-person-standard/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [How Does a Conclusive Evidence Clause Alter the Balance of Power in a Financial Agreement?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-conclusive-evidence-clause-alter-the-balance-of-power-in-a-financial-agreement/)
![Robust metallic structures, one blue-tinted, one teal, intersect, covered in granular water droplets. This depicts a principal's institutional RFQ framework facilitating multi-leg spread execution, aggregating deep liquidity pools for optimal price discovery and high-fidelity atomic settlement of digital asset derivatives for enhanced capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-optimized-for-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

A conclusive evidence clause re-architects a financial agreement to grant one party binding authority on debt calculation.

- 
### [What Legal Liabilities Arise from Misclassifying a Tender as an Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-legal-liabilities-arise-from-misclassifying-a-tender-as-an-rfp/)
![A sleek green probe, symbolizing a precise RFQ protocol, engages a dark, textured execution venue, representing a digital asset derivatives liquidity pool. This signifies institutional-grade price discovery and high-fidelity execution through an advanced Prime RFQ, minimizing slippage and optimizing capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-integration-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-institutional-liquidity-aggregation-on-prime-os.jpg)

Misclassifying a tender as an RFP creates a binding process contract, exposing the issuer to significant liability for breach of fairness.

- 
### [What Procedural Steps Are Essential for a Defensible Close-Out Calculation under the 2002 ISDA Master Agreement?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-procedural-steps-are-essential-for-a-defensible-close-out-calculation-under-the-2002-isda-master-agreement/)
![Intersecting sleek components of a Crypto Derivatives OS symbolize RFQ Protocol for Institutional Grade Digital Asset Derivatives. Luminous internal segments represent dynamic Liquidity Pool management and Market Microstructure insights, facilitating High-Fidelity Execution for Block Trade strategies within a Prime Brokerage framework.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-engine.jpg)

A defensible 2002 ISDA close-out is an objectively evidenced calculation of replacement cost derived from a rigorously documented process.

- 
### [What Are the Primary Legal Risks of Misclassifying a Material Rfp Change?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-legal-risks-of-misclassifying-a-material-rfp-change/)
![A precision instrument probes a speckled surface, visualizing market microstructure and liquidity pool dynamics within a dark pool. This depicts RFQ protocol execution, emphasizing price discovery for digital asset derivatives. Elements represent volatility surface data and algorithmic trading probes ensuring capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-flow.jpg)

Misclassifying a material RFP change exposes an organization to significant legal and financial risks, including bid protests and breach of contract claims.

- 
### [What Are the Legal Implications of an Automated System Triggering a Default Notice?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-legal-implications-of-an-automated-system-triggering-a-default-notice/)
![Stacked precision-engineered circular components, varying in size and color, rest on a cylindrical base. This modular assembly symbolizes a robust Crypto Derivatives OS architecture, enabling high-fidelity execution for institutional RFQ protocols. It embodies layered liquidity aggregation, optimized price discovery within market microstructure, and capital efficiency for digital asset derivatives.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-protocol-architecture-optimized-for-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

Automated default systems shift legal liability from discrete human error to the systemic integrity of your entire operational architecture.

- 
### [What Defines Commercial Reasonableness in a Close out Calculation?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-defines-commercial-reasonableness-in-a-close-out-calculation/)
![A macro view reveals the intricate mechanical core of an institutional-grade system, symbolizing the market microstructure of digital asset derivatives trading. Interlocking components and a precision gear suggest high-fidelity execution and algorithmic trading within an RFQ protocol framework, enabling price discovery and liquidity aggregation for multi-leg spreads on a Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system-precision-engine.jpg)

Commercial reasonableness is an objective, evidence-based standard for valuing terminated derivatives to ensure a fair and legally defensible outcome.

- 
### [How Does the 2002 Isda Close out Amount Differ from the 1992 Agreement?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-2002-isda-close-out-amount-differ-from-the-1992-agreement/)
![Abstract image showing interlocking metallic and translucent blue components, suggestive of a sophisticated RFQ engine. This depicts the precision of an institutional-grade Crypto Derivatives OS, facilitating high-fidelity execution and optimal price discovery within complex market microstructure for multi-leg spreads and atomic settlement.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-market-microstructure-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq.jpg)

The 2002 ISDA Close-Out Amount replaces subjective valuation with an objective standard of commercial reasonableness for greater certainty.

- 
### [What Are the Legal Ramifications for an Organization That Issues a Demonstrably Biased RFP?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-legal-ramifications-for-an-organization-that-issues-a-demonstrably-biased-rfp/)
![A dark, reflective surface displays a luminous green line, symbolizing a high-fidelity RFQ protocol channel within a Crypto Derivatives OS. This signifies precise price discovery for digital asset derivatives, ensuring atomic settlement and optimizing portfolio margin. A textured element implies the execution management system EMS controlling block trades and multi-leg spreads on a Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-pathway-optimizing-principal-liquidity-and-capital-efficiency.jpg)

A biased RFP is a flawed protocol that creates immediate legal liability and degrades an organization's operational integrity.

- 
### [What Are the Legal Risks for an Issuer Who Tries to Negotiate after Selecting a Winner in a Binding Rfp Process?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-legal-risks-for-an-issuer-who-tries-to-negotiate-after-selecting-a-winner-in-a-binding-rfp-process/)
![Precision-engineered institutional-grade Prime RFQ component, showcasing a reflective sphere and teal control. This symbolizes RFQ protocol mechanics, emphasizing high-fidelity execution, atomic settlement, and capital efficiency in digital asset derivatives market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-precision-execution-system-design.jpg)

Navigating post-RFP negotiations requires a deep understanding of contract law and a commitment to procedural fairness.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "Can a Single Legal Case Involve Both Objective and Subjective Standards for Different Claims?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/can-a-single-legal-case-involve-both-objective-and-subjective-standards-for-different-claims/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/can-a-single-legal-case-involve-both-objective-and-subjective-standards-for-different-claims/"
    },
    "headline": "Can a Single Legal Case Involve Both Objective and Subjective Standards for Different Claims? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "Yes, a single legal case can systematically involve both objective and subjective standards to adjudicate different claims within the same dispute. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/can-a-single-legal-case-involve-both-objective-and-subjective-standards-for-different-claims/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-13T05:54:28+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-08-13T05:54:30+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-core-processing-architecture-visualized-through-interconnected-liquidity-networks.jpg",
        "caption": "This abstract visualization depicts the sophisticated inner workings of an institutional-grade Crypto Derivatives OS. The open structure exposes the complex interplay of high-fidelity execution algorithms and aggregated inquiry processing within a private quotation network. It embodies the seamless integration of liquidity pools, enabling robust price discovery and advanced portfolio margin management for Bitcoin options and Ethereum futures, ensuring capital efficiency and best execution within the market microstructure."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Breach of Contract",
        "Burden of Proof",
        "Evidentiary Strategy",
        "Fraudulent Misrepresentation",
        "Legal Standards",
        "Negligence",
        "Objective Standard",
        "Pleading in the Alternative",
        "Reasonable Person Standard",
        "Subjective Standard",
        "Summary Judgment"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/can-a-single-legal-case-involve-both-objective-and-subjective-standards-for-different-claims/
