# Can You Change Evaluation Criteria after an Rfp Has Been Issued? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-06
**Categories:** Question

---

![A central rod, symbolizing an RFQ inquiry, links distinct liquidity pools and market makers. A transparent disc, an execution venue, facilitates price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-protocol-execution-optimization.jpg)

![A central, multi-layered cylindrical component rests on a highly reflective surface. This core quantitative analytics engine facilitates high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-core-optimization.jpg)

## Concept

The question of altering [evaluation criteria](https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-criteria/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) after a Request for Proposal (RFP) has been issued is a matter of operational integrity. From a systems architecture perspective, an RFP is a defined protocol for a complex procurement transaction. Its evaluation criteria represent the core logic ▴ the set of rules by which all inputs (proposals) will be processed to produce a single, optimized output (the [contract award](https://prime.greeks.live/area/contract-award/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)). To change this logic mid-stream is to introduce a significant exception into a live process, an action that carries substantial risk and requires meticulous handling.

The capacity to modify criteria is a necessary function, providing the flexibility to correct an error or adapt to a clarified understanding of requirements. Government procurement regulations, such as the U.S. [Federal Acquisition Regulation](https://prime.greeks.live/area/federal-acquisition-regulation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (FAR), explicitly permit agencies to amend solicitations. This authority, however, is not a license for arbitrary changes.

It is a tool for corrective action, intended to be used when the original criteria are found to be inconsistent with the agency’s needs or to unfairly impair competition. The fundamental principle is that any modification must serve the best interests of the issuing entity while upholding the structural fairness of the competition.

> A change to RFP evaluation criteria is permissible, but it must be executed through a formal amendment process that ensures all participants are treated equitably.

The core challenge lies in balancing the need for adaptation with the principles of transparency and equal treatment. When an RFP is issued, it creates a level playing field where all potential vendors operate under the same set of assumptions and constraints. The evaluation criteria and their relative weights signal the issuer’s priorities, guiding vendors in the significant investment of time and resources required to prepare a responsive proposal.

Changing these criteria after proposals have been submitted, or even after they are in development, can invalidate the work already done and potentially favor one vendor over another, even if unintentionally. This creates a risk of bid protests and legal challenges, which can delay or even derail a critical procurement.

Therefore, the decision to [change evaluation criteria](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-determine-the-appropriate-weighting-for-evaluation-criteria-in-an-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is a high-stakes one. It requires a rigorous internal assessment to justify the necessity of the change and a formal, transparent process to implement it. The primary directive is to maintain the integrity of the procurement system.

Any change must be communicated to all participating offerors, and they must be given a reasonable opportunity to revise their proposals in response. This ensures that the competitive environment, though altered, remains fair for all participants.

![A transparent, angular teal object with an embedded dark circular lens rests on a light surface. This visualizes an institutional-grade RFQ engine, enabling high-fidelity execution and precise price discovery for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-engine-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

![A central circular element, vertically split into light and dark hemispheres, frames a metallic, four-pronged hub. Two sleek, grey cylindrical structures diagonally intersect behind it](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocol-for-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-1.jpg)

## Strategy

Strategically, the decision to modify [RFP evaluation criteria](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation-criteria/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) post-issuance is a calculated risk. It pits the operational necessity of refining requirements against the procedural imperative of maintaining a fair and defensible procurement process. The core strategic question is whether the benefit of a more accurate evaluation outweighs the potential costs of administrative delays, vendor complaints, and legal challenges.

![A luminous conical element projects from a multi-faceted transparent teal crystal, signifying RFQ protocol precision and price discovery. This embodies institutional grade digital asset derivatives high-fidelity execution, leveraging Prime RFQ for liquidity aggregation and atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-rfq-protocol-orchestration-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Justification and Risk Assessment

An entity must first establish a compelling justification for the change. Common valid reasons include the discovery of a flaw in the original RFP that creates an unjustified standard, a significant change in the project’s underlying requirements, or the need to clarify ambiguity that has become apparent through vendor questions. For instance, if an agency realizes that a specified technical standard is obsolete or that a key objective was omitted, amending the criteria is a strategic necessity to align the procurement with its actual needs. The key is that the change must be driven by the entity’s requirements, not by the content of proposals already received.

Once a justification is established, a risk assessment is critical. The level of risk is directly proportional to the materiality of the change and the stage of the procurement process. A minor clarification issued shortly after the RFP release carries far less risk than a fundamental change to the weighting of price versus technical merit after initial proposals have been opened. The latter action fundamentally alters the basis of the competition and is highly likely to trigger a [bid protest](https://prime.greeks.live/area/bid-protest/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite).

> The strategic imperative is to ensure any change strengthens the procurement’s outcome without fatally compromising its procedural integrity.

The following table outlines the strategic considerations and potential consequences of amending RFP criteria versus proceeding with flawed criteria:

### Table 1 ▴ Strategic Analysis of Amending RFP Criteria

| Strategic Consideration | Action ▴ Amend RFP Criteria | Action ▴ Proceed with Flawed Criteria |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Alignment with Needs | Ensures final award aligns with actual, updated project requirements. | Risks awarding a contract for a solution that does not meet the entity’s true needs. |
| Procurement Timeline | Introduces delays due to the amendment process and proposal revision period. | Maintains original timeline but risks longer delays later from contract disputes or project failure. |
| Legal and Protest Risk | Carries risk of protests if the amendment process is not handled with perfect transparency and fairness. | Carries risk of protests from vendors who argue the flawed criteria led to an improper award decision. |
| Vendor Relations | May frustrate vendors but demonstrates a commitment to a fair process if handled transparently. | Can damage reputation and discourage future participation from high-quality vendors. |
| Cost Implications | Incurs administrative costs for managing the amendment process. | Risks higher long-term costs from a suboptimal contract award or necessary post-award modifications. |

![Complex metallic and translucent components represent a sophisticated Prime RFQ for institutional digital asset derivatives. This market microstructure visualization depicts high-fidelity execution and price discovery within an RFQ protocol](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-dynamics.jpg)

## What Constitutes a Defensible Amendment Strategy?

A defensible strategy for changing evaluation criteria hinges on process and communication. The amendment must be formalized and distributed to every vendor who received the original RFP. This communication should clearly articulate the changes, explain the rationale, and, most importantly, provide a reasonable extension to the submission deadline.

This extension is critical as it gives all offerors the necessary time to analyze the changes and revise their entire proposal, not just the parts directly affected by the amendment. The goal is to reset the competitive landscape fairly for everyone, ensuring that no vendor is disadvantaged by the timing or nature of the change.

![A transparent cylinder containing a white sphere floats between two curved structures, each featuring a glowing teal line. This depicts institutional-grade RFQ protocols driving high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives, facilitating private quotation and liquidity aggregation through a Prime RFQ for optimal block trade atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-execution-6.jpg)

![A precisely engineered system features layered grey and beige plates, representing distinct liquidity pools or market segments, connected by a central dark blue RFQ protocol hub. Transparent teal bars, symbolizing multi-leg options spreads or algorithmic trading pathways, intersect through this core, facilitating price discovery and high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives via an institutional-grade Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-facilitating-high-fidelity-multi-leg-options-spread-execution-best-price-discovery-and-latent-liquidity-access-for-prime-brokerage.jpg)

## Execution

Executing a change to [RFP evaluation](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) criteria is a precise, procedural operation. It requires a systematic approach to ensure that the principles of fairness and transparency are upheld, thereby minimizing the risk of a successful bid protest. The execution phase is about translating the strategic decision to amend into a series of auditable, defensible actions.

![A sleek, multi-segmented sphere embodies a Principal's operational framework for institutional digital asset derivatives. Its transparent 'intelligence layer' signifies high-fidelity execution and price discovery via RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocol-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-engine.jpg)

## The Formal Amendment Protocol

Any modification must be formalized through an official amendment document. In U.S. government procurement, this is often done using a Standard Form 30 (SF30). This document becomes an integral part of the RFP. The protocol for its implementation is rigid and must be followed without deviation.

- 
**Internal Justification and Approval** The first step is to create a detailed internal memorandum that documents the precise reasons for the change, the analysis of its impact on the procurement, and the legal basis for the action. This document is a critical piece of evidence should a protest arise.

- 
**[Formal Amendment](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-confidentiality-of-expert-determination-compare-to-formal-arbitration/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) Drafting** The amendment itself must be drafted with clarity. It should explicitly state the original criterion, the new criterion, and the reason for the change. Ambiguity in the amendment can create new grounds for protest. The document must also specify a new, extended deadline for proposal submission.

- 
**Universal Distribution** The amendment must be sent to all parties that initially received the RFP. It is insufficient to only notify vendors who have submitted questions or indicated an intent to bid. The distribution method should be the same as the one used for the original RFP to ensure comprehensive reach.

- 
**Acknowledgement of Receipt** The process should require vendors to formally acknowledge receipt of the amendment. This is often done by having them sign and return the amendment form with their proposal. Failure to acknowledge a material amendment can be grounds for disqualifying a proposal as nonresponsive.

- 
**Fair Opportunity for Revision** Crucially, all offerors must be given the opportunity to submit revised proposals. The general rule is that when an amendment is issued, vendors may revise any part of their proposal, not just the sections directly impacted by the change, unless the amendment explicitly restricts the scope of revisions. This ensures that vendors can adjust their entire strategy to the new evaluation logic.

![Curved, segmented surfaces in blue, beige, and teal, with a transparent cylindrical element against a dark background. This abstractly depicts volatility surfaces and market microstructure, facilitating high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols for digital asset derivatives, enabling price discovery and revealing latent liquidity for institutional trading](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/optimized-rfq-protocol-dynamics-for-institutional-crypto-derivatives.jpg)

## Analyzing the Materiality of a Change

A key concept in the execution is “materiality.” A [material change](https://prime.greeks.live/area/material-change/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is one that alters the legal obligations of the parties or has a significant impact on price, quantity, quality, or delivery. Failing to acknowledge a material amendment will almost certainly render a proposal unacceptable. Therefore, the issuing entity must operate under the assumption that any change to evaluation criteria is material.

> Executing a change to evaluation criteria is a procedural test of an organization’s commitment to fair and transparent procurement.

The following table provides a risk model for assessing the potential impact of changing evaluation criteria based on various factors.

### Table 2 ▴ Risk Assessment Model for Amending Evaluation Criteria

| Risk Factor | Low Risk Scenario | Medium Risk Scenario | High Risk Scenario |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Timing of Change | Shortly after RFP release, before significant proposal work has begun. | After vendor questions are received but before submission deadline. | After initial proposals are received or during negotiations. |
| Nature of Change | Minor clarification of an existing criterion (e.g. defining a term). | Adding a new, minor sub-criterion or adjusting the weight of a non-price factor by a small percentage. | Fundamentally changing a major criterion, such as the weighting between technical and price factors, or removing a key requirement. |
| Communication Method | Formal amendment issued to all vendors with significant deadline extension. | Formal amendment issued, but with a potentially insufficient deadline extension. | Informal communication, or failure to notify all potential offerors. |
| Impact on Competition | The change is unlikely to favor any specific vendor’s known approach or technology. | The change may inadvertently align with the known strengths of one or more vendors. | The change clearly favors a specific vendor or renders work done by others obsolete. |

![Transparent conduits and metallic components abstractly depict institutional digital asset derivatives trading. Symbolizing cross-protocol RFQ execution, multi-leg spreads, and high-fidelity atomic settlement across aggregated liquidity pools, it reflects prime brokerage infrastructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/cross-protocol-rfq-execution-digital-asset-derivatives-microstructure-system.jpg)

## How Do Bid Protests Relate to Improper Amendments?

A bid protest is the formal mechanism by which a vendor can challenge a procurement decision. One of the most common grounds for a successful protest is that the procuring agency failed to evaluate proposals in accordance with the criteria stated in the solicitation. If an agency changes the criteria without a formal amendment, or applies unstated criteria, it creates a strong basis for a protest.

Protesters can argue that the agency acted unreasonably and that they were prejudiced by the action, meaning there was a substantial chance they would have won the award if the agency had followed its own rules. Proper execution of the amendment protocol is the primary defense against such challenges.

![A dark, transparent capsule, representing a principal's secure channel, is intersected by a sharp teal prism and an opaque beige plane. This illustrates institutional digital asset derivatives interacting with dynamic market microstructure and aggregated liquidity](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-market-microstructure.jpg)

## References

- Jackson Kelly PLLC. “Recent Case Affirms that Offeror Proposal Changes May Exceed RFP Amendment Scope Unless Explicitly Prohibited.” Jackson Kelly PLLC, 28 May 2013.

- Euna Solutions. “RFP Evaluation Criteria ▴ Everything You Need to Know.” Euna Solutions, 2023.

- Watson & Associates, LLC. “Rules on Request for Proposal (RFP) & Government Solicitation Amendments.” Watson & Associates, LLC Government Contracts Blog, 2022.

- NIGP ▴ The Institute for Public Procurement. “Public Procurement Practice ▴ Request for Proposals (RFP).” NIGP, 2020.

- Whytsell, Eric. “Rule of Thumb ▴ Treat All RFP Amendments as Material.” Jackson Kelly PLLC Blog, 23 May 2016.

![A central processing core with intersecting, transparent structures revealing intricate internal components and blue data flows. This symbolizes an institutional digital asset derivatives platform's Prime RFQ, orchestrating high-fidelity execution, managing aggregated RFQ inquiries, and ensuring atomic settlement within dynamic market microstructure, optimizing capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-system-facilitating-high-fidelity-rfq-protocol-optimization-for-best-execution-and-atomic-settlement.jpg)

## Reflection

The examination of this procedural question reveals a deeper truth about institutional procurement. The integrity of a procurement system is not defined by its rigidity, but by its capacity to manage change in a structured, fair, and transparent manner. The rules governing RFP amendments are a blueprint for maintaining equilibrium between strategic adaptation and procedural justice.

Consider your own organization’s operational framework. How does it handle exceptions? Is the process for amending a critical protocol viewed as a bureaucratic hurdle or as a vital mechanism for preserving the system’s integrity? The confidence that vendors place in a procurement process is a direct reflection of the discipline with which that process is managed.

A well-executed amendment reinforces trust; a poorly handled one erodes it, potentially repelling the very partners you seek to attract. The ultimate strategic advantage lies in building a procurement architecture that is not only robust but also resilient and respected by all participants.

![Translucent, multi-layered forms evoke an institutional RFQ engine, its propeller-like elements symbolizing high-fidelity execution and algorithmic trading. This depicts precise price discovery, deep liquidity pool dynamics, and capital efficiency within a Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives block trades](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine-14.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-criteria/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Robust metallic structures, symbolizing institutional grade digital asset derivatives infrastructure, intersect. Transparent blue-green planes represent algorithmic trading and high-fidelity execution for multi-leg spreads](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-microstructure-1.jpg)

## Evaluation Criteria

Meaning ▴ Evaluation Criteria define the quantifiable metrics and qualitative standards against which the performance, compliance, or risk profile of a system, strategy, or transaction is rigorously assessed. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/contract-award/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstractly depicting an Institutional Grade Crypto Derivatives OS component. Its robust structure and metallic interface signify precise Market Microstructure for High-Fidelity Execution of RFQ Protocol and Block Trade orders](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principals-integrated-crypto-derivatives-rfq-protocol-architecture.jpg)

## Contract Award

Meaning ▴ The Contract Award signifies the formal designation of a counterparty as the successful bidder or negotiator for a digital asset derivative instrument, solidifying the precise terms of the transaction. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/federal-acquisition-regulation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A robust institutional framework composed of interlocked grey structures, featuring a central dark execution channel housing luminous blue crystalline elements representing deep liquidity and aggregated inquiry. A translucent teal prism symbolizes dynamic digital asset derivatives and the volatility surface, showcasing precise price discovery within a high-fidelity execution environment, powered by the Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-intelligence-layer.jpg)

## Federal Acquisition Regulation

Meaning ▴ The Federal Acquisition Regulation, or FAR, constitutes the principal set of rules governing the acquisition process for all executive agencies of the United States federal government. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-determine-the-appropriate-weighting-for-evaluation-criteria-in-an-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Angular metallic structures precisely intersect translucent teal planes against a dark backdrop. This embodies an institutional-grade Digital Asset Derivatives platform's market microstructure, signifying high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-high-fidelity-execution-system-architecture.jpg)

## Change Evaluation Criteria

An RFP's evaluation criteria weighting is the strategic calibration of a decision-making architecture to deliver an optimal, defensible outcome. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation-criteria/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A transparent bar precisely intersects a dark blue circular module, symbolizing an RFQ protocol for institutional digital asset derivatives. This depicts high-fidelity execution within a dynamic liquidity pool, optimizing market microstructure via a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-protocol-for-prime-os-execution.jpg)

## Rfp Evaluation Criteria

Meaning ▴ RFP Evaluation Criteria define the structured framework employed by institutional entities to systematically assess vendor proposals for complex technology and service procurements, particularly within the domain of institutional digital asset derivatives infrastructure, ensuring precise alignment with defined operational requirements and strategic objectives. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/bid-protest/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Two precision-engineered nodes, possibly representing a Private Quotation or RFQ mechanism, connect via a transparent conduit against a striped Market Microstructure backdrop. This visualizes High-Fidelity Execution pathways for Institutional Grade Digital Asset Derivatives, enabling Atomic Settlement and Capital Efficiency within a Dark Pool environment, optimizing Price Discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-system-nodes.jpg)

## Bid Protest

Meaning ▴ A Bid Protest represents a formal, auditable mechanism within an institutional digital asset derivatives trading framework, enabling a principal to systematically challenge the integrity or outcome of a competitive pricing event. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Sleek, metallic form with precise lines represents a robust Institutional Grade Prime RFQ for Digital Asset Derivatives. The prominent, reflective blue dome symbolizes an Intelligence Layer for Price Discovery and Market Microstructure visibility, enabling High-Fidelity Execution via RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/prime-os-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-engine.jpg)

## Rfp Evaluation

Meaning ▴ RFP Evaluation denotes the structured, systematic process undertaken by an institutional entity to assess and score vendor proposals submitted in response to a Request for Proposal, specifically for technology and services pertaining to institutional digital asset derivatives. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-confidentiality-of-expert-determination-compare-to-formal-arbitration/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Central axis with angular, teal forms, radiating transparent lines. Abstractly represents an institutional grade Prime RFQ execution engine for digital asset derivatives, processing aggregated inquiries via RFQ protocols, ensuring high-fidelity execution and price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-execution-market-microstructure-price-discovery-volatility-surface-analytics.jpg)

## Formal Amendment

Expert determination offers bespoke, contract-based privacy, while arbitration provides formalized, legally-structured confidentiality. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/material-change/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A transparent sphere, bisected by dark rods, symbolizes an RFQ protocol's core. This represents multi-leg spread execution within a high-fidelity market microstructure for institutional grade digital asset derivatives, ensuring optimal price discovery and capital efficiency via Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Material Change

Meaning ▴ A Material Change designates a quantifiable, significant alteration in the fundamental risk profile, valuation parameters, or operational integrity pertaining to a digital asset, derivative contract, or associated counterparty. </a>

**Tags:** [Evaluation Criteria](https://options.greeks.live/area/evaluation-criteria/), [Bid Protest](https://options.greeks.live/area/bid-protest/), [Government Solicitation](https://options.greeks.live/area/government-solicitation/), [Contract Award](https://options.greeks.live/area/contract-award/), [Vendor Communication](https://options.greeks.live/area/vendor-communication/), [Transparency in Procurement](https://options.greeks.live/area/transparency-in-procurement/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [What Are the Most Common Reasons for Bid Protests Related to RFP Amendments?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-reasons-for-bid-protests-related-to-rfp-amendments/)
![Geometric panels, light and dark, interlocked by a luminous diagonal, depict an institutional RFQ protocol for digital asset derivatives. Central nodes symbolize liquidity aggregation and price discovery within a Principal's execution management system, enabling high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement in market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine-1.jpg)

A bid protest of an RFP amendment is a systemic correction triggered by procedural flaws that undermine fair competition.

- 
### [What Constitutes a Material Change in an Rfp That Warrants a Deadline Extension?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-constitutes-a-material-change-in-an-rfp-that-warrants-a-deadline-extension/)
![A central glowing core within metallic structures symbolizes an Institutional Grade RFQ engine. This Intelligence Layer enables optimal Price Discovery and High-Fidelity Execution for Digital Asset Derivatives, streamlining Block Trade and Multi-Leg Spread Atomic Settlement.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-microstructure-core.jpg)

A material change is a modification to an RFP that significantly alters its core requirements, necessitating a deadline extension to ensure fair competition.

- 
### [What Are the Legal Risks If an Organization Deviates from Its Own Binding Rfp Process?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-legal-risks-if-an-organization-deviates-from-its-own-binding-rfp-process/)
![A sleek, multi-layered digital asset derivatives platform highlights a teal sphere, symbolizing a core liquidity pool or atomic settlement node. The perforated white interface represents an RFQ protocol's aggregated inquiry points for multi-leg spread execution, reflecting precise market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-core-execution-system.jpg)

Deviating from a binding RFP breaches an implied contract, exposing the organization to legal claims and systemic reputational damage.

- 
### [What Is the Legal Distinction between a Clarification and a Material Change during the Rfp Process?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-legal-distinction-between-a-clarification-and-a-material-change-during-the-rfp-process/)
![Abstract spheres depict segmented liquidity pools within a unified Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives. Intersecting blades symbolize precise RFQ protocol negotiation, price discovery, and high-fidelity execution of multi-leg spread strategies, reflecting market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-1.jpg)

A clarification interprets an RFP's existing rules; a material change fundamentally rewrites them, altering the competitive system.

- 
### [What Are the Primary Grounds for a Bidder to Protest an Rfp Cancellation?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-grounds-for-a-bidder-to-protest-an-rfp-cancellation/)
![A sophisticated, multi-component system propels a sleek, teal-colored digital asset derivative trade. The complex internal structure represents a proprietary RFQ protocol engine with liquidity aggregation and price discovery mechanisms. This visualizes high-fidelity execution of Bitcoin options or Ethereum futures, demonstrating capital efficiency and slippage minimization within a market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principals-high-fidelity-rfq-engine-for-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

A bidder may protest an RFP cancellation by demonstrating the procuring entity's decision lacked a reasonable basis or was a pretext.

- 
### [What Are the Key Legal Risks When Negotiating in a Public Sector Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-legal-risks-when-negotiating-in-a-public-sector-rfp/)
![A precision metallic dial on a multi-layered interface embodies an institutional RFQ engine. The translucent panel suggests an intelligence layer for real-time price discovery and high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives, optimizing capital efficiency for block trades within complex market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-high-fidelity-execution-system.jpg)

Navigating public sector RFP legal risks requires a system of procedural fairness, transparency, and documented due process.

- 
### [What Are the Most Critical Legal Risks Associated with a Poorly Executed RFP Evaluation Process?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-critical-legal-risks-associated-with-a-poorly-executed-rfp-evaluation-process/)
![A transparent sphere, bisected by dark rods, symbolizes an RFQ protocol's core. This represents multi-leg spread execution within a high-fidelity market microstructure for institutional grade digital asset derivatives, ensuring optimal price discovery and capital efficiency via Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

A poorly executed RFP evaluation breaches an implied contract of fairness, exposing the organization to costly bid protests and legal challenges.

- 
### [Can a Material Change to a Public Rfp Ever Be Justified without Cancelling the Procurement Process?](https://options.greeks.live/question/can-a-material-change-to-a-public-rfp-ever-be-justified-without-cancelling-the-procurement-process/)
![A sophisticated metallic mechanism with a central pivoting component and parallel structural elements, indicative of a precision engineered RFQ engine. Polished surfaces and visible fasteners suggest robust algorithmic trading infrastructure for high-fidelity execution and latency optimization. Circular depressions imply aggregated inquiry points, facilitating price discovery for institutional digital asset derivatives within a Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-mechanism-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-and-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

A material RFP change can be justified without cancellation if it serves a compelling public interest and procedural fairness is meticulously restored.

- 
### [What Are the Legal Risks of Using Vague Cultural Criteria in Public Sector Rfp Evaluations?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-legal-risks-of-using-vague-cultural-criteria-in-public-sector-rfp-evaluations/)
![A transparent, blue-tinted sphere, anchored to a metallic base on a light surface, symbolizes an RFQ inquiry for digital asset derivatives. A fine line represents low-latency FIX Protocol for high-fidelity execution, optimizing price discovery in market microstructure via Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-rfq-protocol-sphere-high-fidelity-execution-gateway.jpg)

Using vague cultural criteria in public RFPs creates significant legal risk by undermining transparency and inviting challenges of bias and unfair treatment.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "Can You Change Evaluation Criteria after an Rfp Has Been Issued?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/can-you-change-evaluation-criteria-after-an-rfp-has-been-issued/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/can-you-change-evaluation-criteria-after-an-rfp-has-been-issued/"
    },
    "headline": "Can You Change Evaluation Criteria after an Rfp Has Been Issued? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "Modifying RFP evaluation criteria post-issuance is a permissible but high-risk action requiring a formal, transparent amendment protocol. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/can-you-change-evaluation-criteria-after-an-rfp-has-been-issued/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-06T01:56:49+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-08-06T01:56:49+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-microstructure-1.jpg",
        "caption": "Intersecting metallic structures overlaid with transparent, angular blue-green shapes, against a dark background with a blurred circular object, visually represent the intricate market microstructure of institutional grade digital asset derivatives trading. Transparent overlays symbolize algorithmic trading and high-fidelity execution strategies, crucial for multi-leg spreads and block trades via RFQ protocols. The underlying dark ring suggests latent liquidity and order book dynamics for capital efficiency within a Prime RFQ."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Bid Protest",
        "Contract Award",
        "Evaluation Criteria",
        "Federal Acquisition Regulation",
        "Government Solicitation",
        "Material Change",
        "Procedural Fairness",
        "Procurement Law",
        "Proposal Revision",
        "RFP Amendment",
        "RFP Evaluation",
        "RFP Evaluation Criteria",
        "Transparency in Procurement",
        "Vendor Communication"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "FAQPage",
    "mainEntity": [
        {
            "@type": "Question",
            "name": "What Constitutes A Defensible Amendment Strategy?",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "@type": "Answer",
                "text": "A defensible strategy for changing evaluation criteria hinges on process and communication. The amendment must be formalized and distributed to every vendor who received the original RFP. This communication should clearly articulate the changes, explain the rationale, and, most importantly, provide a reasonable extension to the submission deadline. This extension is critical as it gives all offerors the necessary time to analyze the changes and revise their entire proposal, not just the parts directly affected by the amendment. The goal is to reset the competitive landscape fairly for everyone, ensuring that no vendor is disadvantaged by the timing or nature of the change."
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Question",
            "name": "How Do Bid Protests Relate To Improper Amendments?",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "@type": "Answer",
                "text": "A bid protest is the formal mechanism by which a vendor can challenge a procurement decision. One of the most common grounds for a successful protest is that the procuring agency failed to evaluate proposals in accordance with the criteria stated in the solicitation. If an agency changes the criteria without a formal amendment, or applies unstated criteria, it creates a strong basis for a protest. Protesters can argue that the agency acted unreasonably and that they were prejudiced by the action, meaning there was a substantial chance they would have won the award if the agency had followed its own rules. Proper execution of the amendment protocol is the primary defense against such challenges."
            }
        }
    ]
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/can-you-change-evaluation-criteria-after-an-rfp-has-been-issued/
