# How Can a Firm Create an Objective Scoring Model for a Pms Rfp? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-09
**Categories:** Question

---

![Intersecting concrete structures symbolize the robust Market Microstructure underpinning Institutional Grade Digital Asset Derivatives. Dynamic spheres represent Liquidity Pools and Implied Volatility](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-framework-optimizing-rfq-execution-and-liquidity-for-principal-trading.jpg)

![Abstract bisected spheres, reflective grey and textured teal, forming an infinity, symbolize institutional digital asset derivatives. Grey represents high-fidelity execution and market microstructure teal, deep liquidity pools and volatility surface data](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocols-for-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

## Concept

The creation of an objective [scoring model](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-simple-scoring-and-weighted-scoring-in-an-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) for a [Performance Management System](https://prime.greeks.live/area/performance-management-system/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (PMS) Request for Proposal (RFP) represents a foundational act of institutional self-awareness. It is the mechanism by which a firm translates its strategic imperatives into a quantifiable, defensible, and transparent decision-making framework. This process moves the selection of a critical technology partner from the realm of subjective preference and into an arena of disciplined, data-driven analysis. The resulting model functions as a calibrated instrument, designed to measure the alignment between a vendor’s proposed solution and the firm’s most critical operational and financial objectives.

At its core, the endeavor is about building a system of weights and measures that reflects a firm’s unique identity and future-state ambitions. Every criterion included, and every weight assigned, is a declaration of priority. A high weighting on API flexibility signals a commitment to a composable, integrated technology stack.

A heavy emphasis on multi-asset class support reveals a strategic plan for product expansion. Consequently, the scoring model becomes more than a procurement tool; it becomes a codification of corporate strategy, ensuring that the significant capital and operational investment in a new PMS is directly tethered to the highest-value outcomes as defined by the organization’s leadership.

> A well-structured scoring model transforms the abstract language of business needs into the concrete, comparable data required for rigorous evaluation.

This disciplined approach provides a necessary defense against the inherent biases that can derail a selection process. Evaluator predisposition, the persuasive power of a vendor demonstration, or an undue focus on a single compelling feature can be tempered by the structured logic of the model. It compels stakeholders from across the firm ▴ portfolio management, operations, compliance, and technology ▴ to engage in a vital dialogue, forcing a consensus on what truly matters. This collaborative effort in building the evaluation framework is as valuable as the final scoring itself, fostering alignment and a shared understanding of the project’s ultimate goals long before any vendor proposals are opened.

![A teal-blue textured sphere, signifying a unique RFQ inquiry or private quotation, precisely mounts on a metallic, institutional-grade base. Integrated into a Prime RFQ framework, it illustrates high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement for digital asset derivatives within market microstructure, ensuring capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-prime-os-execution-1.jpg)

![Polished opaque and translucent spheres intersect sharp metallic structures. This abstract composition represents advanced RFQ protocols for institutional digital asset derivatives, illustrating multi-leg spread execution, latent liquidity aggregation, and high-fidelity execution within principal-driven trading environments](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-optimal-execution-orchestration.jpg)

## Strategy

![A dark central hub with three reflective, translucent blades extending. This represents a Principal's operational framework for digital asset derivatives, processing aggregated liquidity and multi-leg spread inquiries](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-rfq-protocol-engine-for-high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

## The Foundation of Weighted Scoring

The strategic underpinning of any robust PMS [RFP evaluation](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is the principle of [weighted scoring](https://prime.greeks.live/area/weighted-scoring/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). This methodology acknowledges a fundamental reality ▴ not all criteria are of equal importance. A simple scoring system, where each item is evaluated on a flat scale, can produce misleading results, allowing a vendor with strengths in low-priority areas to appear more favorable than a specialist whose capabilities align with the firm’s most critical needs. Weighted scoring corrects this distortion by assigning a specific value or “weight” to each evaluation criterion, ensuring the final score accurately reflects the firm’s strategic priorities. 

Developing this weighting scheme is a strategic exercise in itself. It begins with a comprehensive discovery process involving key stakeholders from every affected business unit. The goal is to distill a long list of desired features and capabilities into a structured hierarchy of needs.

This hierarchy typically organizes criteria into broad categories, which are then assigned a percentage of the total score. For instance, a firm prioritizing operational efficiency and future growth might devise a top-level weighting structure that looks something like this:

- **Core Portfolio Management & Accounting Functionality** ▴ 35%

- **Technical Architecture & Integration Capabilities** ▴ 25%

- **Vendor Viability & Support Model** ▴ 20%

- **User Experience & Reporting** ▴ 10%

- **[Total Cost of Ownership](https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost-of-ownership/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (TCO)** ▴ 10%

![A light sphere, representing a Principal's digital asset, is integrated into an angular blue RFQ protocol framework. Sharp fins symbolize high-fidelity execution and price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principals-core-asset-rfq-protocol-framework-for-digital-derivatives.jpg)

## From Broad Categories to Granular Criteria

With the high-level strategic weights established, the next phase involves populating these categories with specific, measurable criteria. Each of these individual criteria is also assigned a weight within its parent category. This two-tiered weighting system allows for both macro-level strategic alignment and micro-level functional evaluation. For example, within the “Technical Architecture” category, the firm might break down the 25% total allocation as follows:

The process of defining these granular criteria must be rigorous. Each item should be unambiguous, leaving no room for subjective interpretation by the evaluators. Instead of a vague criterion like “Good Reporting,” a better approach is to define specific requirements such as “Ability to generate custom report templates without developer assistance” and “Automated delivery of daily performance reports to specified user groups.”

> The strategic weighting of evaluation criteria ensures that the final vendor selection is a direct reflection of the firm’s prioritized business objectives.

The table below illustrates a comparison of two primary strategic approaches to scoring ▴ simple and weighted. It highlights how the weighted model provides a more nuanced and strategically aligned outcome.

### Table 1 ▴ Comparison of Scoring Methodologies

| Evaluation Aspect | Simple Scoring Approach | Weighted Scoring Approach |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Prioritization | All criteria are treated as equally important. A vendor’s strength in a minor area can mask a weakness in a critical one. | Criteria are assigned weights based on strategic importance, ensuring critical needs have a greater impact on the final score. |
| Objectivity | Higher potential for subjective bias as evaluators may subconsciously inflate scores for criteria they personally favor. | Reduces subjectivity by forcing an upfront, consensus-driven agreement on what is most important to the firm. |
| Outcome Alignment | The highest-scoring vendor may not be the best strategic fit, but rather the one that checks the most boxes overall. | The highest-scoring vendor is, by design, the one that best aligns with the firm’s pre-defined strategic objectives. |
| Stakeholder Communication | Can be difficult to justify the final decision with data, leading to protracted debates. | Provides a clear, data-backed rationale for the selection, facilitating transparent communication with all stakeholders. |

![A sphere split into light and dark segments, revealing a luminous core. This encapsulates the precise Request for Quote RFQ protocol for institutional digital asset derivatives, highlighting high-fidelity execution, optimal price discovery, and advanced market microstructure within aggregated liquidity pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-execution-framework-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-request-for-quote-protocol-optimization.jpg)

![A sophisticated mechanism depicting the high-fidelity execution of institutional digital asset derivatives. It visualizes RFQ protocol efficiency, real-time liquidity aggregation, and atomic settlement within a prime brokerage framework, optimizing market microstructure for multi-leg spreads](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-protocol-execution-liquidity-aggregation-system.jpg)

## Execution

![Internal hard drive mechanics, with a read/write head poised over a data platter, symbolize the precise, low-latency execution and high-fidelity data access vital for institutional digital asset derivatives. This embodies a Principal OS architecture supporting robust RFQ protocols, enabling atomic settlement and optimized liquidity aggregation within complex market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-precision-execution-system-microstructure.jpg)

## The Operational Playbook

Executing an objective scoring process requires a disciplined, sequential methodology. It is a project in its own right, demanding careful planning and management to ensure the integrity of the outcome. The following steps provide a comprehensive playbook for moving from initial concept to a final, data-driven vendor decision.

- **Establish the Evaluation Committee** ▴ The first step is the formation of a cross-functional committee. This group should include representatives from every key stakeholder group ▴ portfolio management, trading, operations, compliance, finance, and information technology. A designated project lead, often from the COO’s office or a dedicated project management office, must be appointed to drive the process, enforce deadlines, and act as the central point of communication.

- **Define and Document Core Objectives** ▴ Before any criteria are drafted, the committee must agree upon and formally document the primary business objectives driving the PMS replacement. Are the goals to reduce operational risk, support expansion into new asset classes, provide superior client reporting, or consolidate disparate systems? These high-level objectives become the guiding principles against which all subsequent criteria and weights are validated.

- **Develop the Comprehensive Criteria List** ▴ The committee engages in a brainstorming phase to create a longlist of all possible requirements and desired features. This should be an exhaustive exercise, capturing everything from mandatory functional requirements (e.g. “must support IBOR/ABOR accounting”) to qualitative vendor attributes (e.g. “demonstrated commitment to R&D”).

- **Structure and Refine the Criteria** ▴ The longlist is then organized into the strategic categories defined earlier (e.g. Functionality, Technology, Vendor, Cost). Redundant items are consolidated, and ambiguous language is clarified. Each criterion is framed as a clear, concise statement that can be objectively assessed. 

- **Conduct the Weighting Process** ▴ This is the most critical phase. The project lead facilitates a formal session where the committee assigns weights to each category and each individual criterion. This can be a contentious process, and the lead must ensure that the final weights are a product of consensus and directly align with the documented core objectives. The sum of category weights must equal 100%, and the sum of criteria weights within each category must also equal 100%.

- **Build the Scoring Rubric and Template** ▴ A detailed scoring rubric is created to guide the evaluators. This rubric defines what each score on the chosen scale (e.g. 0-5) means for a given criterion. For example, for “API Documentation,” a score of 1 might mean “Documentation exists but is incomplete,” while a 5 means “Comprehensive, interactive, and publicly available documentation with code samples.” This rubric is built into a master scoring spreadsheet or a dedicated RFP software platform.

- **Train the Evaluators** ▴ A formal training session is held for all members of the evaluation committee. The project lead walks through the scoring template, the criteria definitions, and the scoring rubric to ensure every evaluator understands the methodology and applies the standards consistently. This step is vital for minimizing inter-rater variability.

- **Score Proposals Independently** ▴ Each evaluator scores every vendor proposal independently. During this phase, it is best practice to avoid discussion among evaluators to prevent groupthink and ensure that the initial scores represent each individual’s objective assessment based on the provided rubric.

- **Normalize and Aggregate Scores** ▴ The project lead collects all individual scoring sheets. The scores are aggregated, and any significant scoring anomalies between evaluators for a specific criterion are flagged. A reconciliation meeting is held to discuss these discrepancies, allowing evaluators to adjust their scores if they misinterpreted a vendor’s response or a piece of the rubric. The final, reconciled scores are then calculated.

- **Analyze Results and Make a Recommendation** ▴ The final weighted scores provide a quantitative ranking of the vendors. This data does not make the decision, but it powerfully informs it. The committee analyzes the results, considering the strengths and weaknesses of the top 2-3 vendors as revealed by the scores. This quantitative analysis forms the foundation of the final recommendation to executive leadership.

![Two dark, circular, precision-engineered components, stacked and reflecting, symbolize a Principal's Operational Framework. This layered architecture facilitates High-Fidelity Execution for Block Trades via RFQ Protocols, ensuring Atomic Settlement and Capital Efficiency within Market Microstructure for Digital Asset Derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-execution-protocol.jpg)

## Quantitative Modeling and Data Analysis

The heart of the execution phase is the quantitative model itself. This is typically a detailed spreadsheet that translates the strategic decisions made during the weighting process into a functional calculation engine. The model’s transparency and mathematical integrity are paramount.

The core calculation for each criterion is straightforward ▴ **[Weighted Score](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-counterparty-performance-score-differ-from-a-traditional-credit-score/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) = (Raw Score x Criterion Weight) x Category Weight**. The sum of these weighted scores across all criteria yields the vendor’s total score.

The table below provides a simplified but illustrative example of a scoring matrix in action. It demonstrates how raw scores provided by an evaluator are transformed into a final, comparable weighted score that reflects the firm’s priorities.

### Table 2 ▴ Sample PMS RFP Scoring Matrix

| Category (Weight) | Criterion (Weight) | Vendor A Raw Score (0-5) | Vendor A Weighted Score | Vendor B Raw Score (0-5) | Vendor B Weighted Score |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Functionality (40%) | Multi-Asset Support (50%) | 5 | (5 0.50) 0.40 = 1.00 | 3 | (3 0.50) 0.40 = 0.60 |
| Technology (25%) | API Availability (60%) | 4 | (4 0.60) 0.25 = 0.60 | 4 | (4 0.60) 0.25 = 0.60 |

> The quantitative model serves as the impartial arbiter, converting qualitative assessments and vendor claims into a unified, comparable metric of strategic alignment.

A sophisticated analysis goes further by incorporating a quantitative assessment of cost. This is more complex than simply looking at the sticker price. A [Total Cost](https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) of Ownership (TCO) model must be developed, factoring in implementation fees, licensing costs, data conversion charges, required hardware upgrades, and ongoing support fees over a multi-year period (typically 3-5 years). The resulting TCO figure can then be integrated into the scoring model, either as a heavily weighted criterion or as a separate value score that is considered alongside the technical and functional scores.

![An intricate, transparent cylindrical system depicts a sophisticated RFQ protocol for digital asset derivatives. Internal glowing elements signify high-fidelity execution and algorithmic trading](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-protocol-architecture.jpg)

## Predictive Scenario Analysis

To truly understand the power of a well-executed scoring model, consider the case of “Sterling Capital,” a hypothetical $15 billion asset manager facing a common challenge. Their legacy, on-premise PMS was becoming a barrier to growth. It struggled with complex derivatives, offered limited client reporting capabilities, and its batch-based architecture created significant operational friction. The firm’s strategic goal was to double its assets in alternative investments over the next five years while simultaneously enhancing its institutional client service model.

This strategic directive became the foundation of their RFP process. The evaluation committee, led by the COO, established a weighting model that heavily prioritized multi-asset support (especially for complex OTC derivatives), API-first architecture for integration with their proprietary risk system, and a flexible, user-driven reporting module. Vendor viability and cost were important, but secondary to these core functional and technical requirements.

Three vendors made the shortlist. “Goliath Systems” was the established industry leader, a safe choice with a massive install base. Their proposal was polished, and their brand instilled confidence.

“InnovateFin,” a newer, cloud-native provider, showed impressive technology and a highly flexible platform, but had a much smaller track record. “NicheSolutions” offered a product with deep capabilities in fixed income and derivatives but was weaker in equity portfolio management, a current core of Sterling’s business.

A simple, unweighted scoring process might have favored Goliath. They checked the most boxes, had a response for every question, and their long history gave them high marks on vendor viability. They would have likely received a high number of “acceptable” or “good” scores across the board.

NicheSolutions would have scored very high in some areas and very low in others. InnovateFin would have scored well on technology but poorly on perceived stability.

However, Sterling’s weighted model painted a different picture. The 40% weight on “Core Functionality” was further broken down, with “Alternative Asset Support” carrying a 60% sub-weight. The 30% weight on “Technical Architecture” gave 70% of its value to “API Capabilities.” When the scores were calculated, the outcome was illuminating. Goliath, while competent everywhere, received only a ‘3 out of 5’ on the heavily weighted alternative asset criteria; their solution was a patchwork of acquisitions.

Their API was functional but not core to their design, earning another ‘3’. Their total weighted score was 3.6. NicheSolutions scored a ‘5’ on derivatives but a ‘1’ on equity workflows, and the balanced weighting within the functionality category penalized them, leading to a score of 3.2. InnovateFin, however, earned a ‘5’ for their native support of complex derivatives and another ‘5’ for their hyper-modern, fully documented REST API.

Even though they scored a ‘2’ on “Years in Business” under the Vendor Viability category, that criterion had a low overall weight. The strength in the areas that mattered most to Sterling’s future strategy propelled InnovateFin to a winning weighted score of 4.4. The model allowed Sterling Capital to look past the perceived safety of the incumbent and make a data-driven decision that was directly aligned with their strategic future, not their operational past.

![A luminous digital market microstructure diagram depicts intersecting high-fidelity execution paths over a transparent liquidity pool. A central RFQ engine processes aggregated inquiries for institutional digital asset derivatives, optimizing price discovery and capital efficiency within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution-principal-operational-framework-price-discovery.jpg)

## System Integration and Technological Architecture

For a PMS, the evaluation of [system integration](https://prime.greeks.live/area/system-integration/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) and technological architecture is a profoundly important component of the scoring model. This category assesses the underlying structure and connectivity of the proposed solution, which dictates its scalability, flexibility, and long-term viability. A PMS is not a standalone application; it is the central hub of an investment firm’s technology ecosystem. Its ability to communicate seamlessly with other systems ▴ such as execution management systems (EMS), order management systems (OMS), risk platforms, and data warehouses ▴ is critical.

Scoring this section requires a specific and technical set of criteria. These should be developed in close collaboration with the firm’s Chief Technology Officer and architecture team. Key areas for evaluation include:

- **[API Strategy](https://prime.greeks.live/area/api-strategy/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)** ▴ This moves beyond a simple “yes/no” for an API. The model should score the quality and comprehensiveness of the API.

<li>_Coverage:_ What percentage of the system’s functionality and data is accessible via the API? A high score is given for near-complete coverage.

- _Technology:_ Is the API modern (e.g. RESTful with JSON payloads) or based on legacy protocols (e.g. SOAP/XML)?

- _Documentation:_ How thorough, clear, and accessible is the documentation? Top scores go to vendors with interactive developer portals.

</li>
- **Data Model and Accessibility** ▴ This criterion assesses the firm’s ability to access its own data.

<li>_Openness:_ Can the firm access the underlying database directly (e.g. via SQL queries to a reporting replica)? Or is all access gated through the application and its API?

- _Extensibility:_ Can custom fields and data structures be added to the core data model without vendor intervention?

</li>
- **Deployment Architecture** ▴ The model must capture the implications of the vendor’s hosting model.

<li>_Platform:_ Is it a multi-tenant SaaS, a single-tenant hosted solution, or an on-premise installation? Each has different implications for security, upgrades, and customization that must be scored against the firm’s own policies and preferences.

- _Scalability and Performance:_ What evidence does the vendor provide for the system’s ability to handle the firm’s projected growth in transaction volume and AUM?

</li>
- **Security and Compliance** ▴ This involves scoring the vendor’s adherence to recognized industry standards.

<li>_Certifications:_ Does the vendor hold relevant certifications like SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001? A simple checklist can be used here.

- _Data Encryption:_ The model should score the vendor’s policies for data encryption, both in transit and at rest.

</li>

![A sleek, institutional-grade Crypto Derivatives OS with an integrated intelligence layer supports a precise RFQ protocol. Two balanced spheres represent principal liquidity units undergoing high-fidelity execution, optimizing capital efficiency within market microstructure for best execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-platform-3.jpg)

## References

- “RFP Scoring System ▴ Evaluating Proposal Excellence.” Oboloo, 15 Sept. 2023.

- “RFP Evaluation Criteria Scoring.” HRO Today, 20 Dec. 2023.

- “RFP Weighted Scoring Demystified ▴ How-to Guide and Examples.” Responsive, 16 Sept. 2022.

- “How RFP scoring works.” SourceForge, 16 June 2023.

- “How to Create and Use a Vendor Selection Criteria Matrix.” Graphite Connect, 11 Oct. 2024.

- Ayal, I. and R. Roth. “Strategic Procurement Management.” Journal of Business Strategy, vol. 32, no. 1, 2011, pp. 24-33.

- Bhutta, K. F. and F. Huq. “Supplier selection problem ▴ a comparison of the total cost of ownership and analytic hierarchy process approaches.” Supply Chain Management ▴ An International Journal, vol. 7, no. 3, 2002, pp. 126-135.

- De Boer, L. E. Labro, and P. Morlacchi. “A review of methods supporting supplier selection.” European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, vol. 7, no. 2, 2001, pp. 75-89.

![A dark blue, precision-engineered blade-like instrument, representing a digital asset derivative or multi-leg spread, rests on a light foundational block, symbolizing a private quotation or block trade. This structure intersects robust teal market infrastructure rails, indicating RFQ protocol execution within a Prime RFQ for high-fidelity execution and liquidity aggregation in institutional trading](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-framework-multi-leg-spreads-best-execution-capital-efficiency.jpg)

## Reflection

![A precision-engineered blue mechanism, symbolizing a high-fidelity execution engine, emerges from a rounded, light-colored liquidity pool component, encased within a sleek teal institutional-grade shell. This represents a Principal's operational framework for digital asset derivatives, demonstrating algorithmic trading logic and smart order routing for block trades via RFQ protocols, ensuring atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-crypto-derivatives-os-core-algorithmic-execution-engine.jpg)

## A Mirror to Strategy

Ultimately, the scoring model a firm builds is a reflection of its own strategic clarity. A model with ill-defined criteria and poorly justified weights suggests an organization unsure of its direction. Conversely, a sharp, well-defined model, born from rigorous internal debate and consensus, is the hallmark of a firm that understands its present needs and has a clear vision for its future. The process of creating the model forces an institution to ask difficult questions and to commit to a quantifiable set of priorities.

![A central, intricate blue mechanism, evocative of an Execution Management System EMS or Prime RFQ, embodies algorithmic trading. Transparent rings signify dynamic liquidity pools and price discovery for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-framework-driving-high-fidelity-rfq-execution-and-optimized-market-microstructure-for-capital-efficiency.jpg)

## The Living Document

The completion of the RFP and the selection of a vendor do not render the scoring model obsolete. It should be preserved as a critical piece of corporate intelligence. When the time comes for the next major technology acquisition, this model serves as a valuable starting point.

More importantly, when reviewing the success of the PMS implementation one, two, or three years post-launch, the original scoring document provides the objective benchmarks against which the vendor’s actual performance and the project’s return on investment can be measured. It is the baseline that holds both the firm and its chosen partner accountable to the strategic goals that initiated the entire endeavor.

![A precision mechanical assembly: black base, intricate metallic components, luminous mint-green ring with dark spherical core. This embodies an institutional Crypto Derivatives OS, its market microstructure enabling high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols for intelligent liquidity aggregation and optimal price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-crypto-derivatives-rfq-engine-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/performance-management-system/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Precision metallic bars intersect above a dark circuit board, symbolizing RFQ protocols driving high-fidelity execution within market microstructure. This represents atomic settlement for institutional digital asset derivatives, enabling price discovery and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-precision-systemic-framework.jpg)

## Performance Management System

Meaning ▴ A Performance Management System is a structured organizational framework designed to systematically monitor, assess, and optimize the output and efficiency of individuals, teams, and technical systems. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-simple-scoring-and-weighted-scoring-in-an-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract geometric structure with sharp angles and translucent planes, symbolizing institutional digital asset derivatives market microstructure. The central point signifies a core RFQ protocol engine, enabling precise price discovery and liquidity aggregation for multi-leg options strategies, crucial for high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principals-operational-framework-optimizing-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-for-alpha-generation.jpg)

## Scoring Model

Simple scoring offers operational ease; weighted scoring provides strategic precision by prioritizing key criteria. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/weighted-scoring/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract intersecting blades in varied textures depict institutional digital asset derivatives. These forms symbolize sophisticated RFQ protocol streams enabling multi-leg spread execution across aggregated liquidity](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-driven-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution.jpg)

## Weighted Scoring

Meaning ▴ Weighted Scoring, in the context of crypto investing and systems architecture, is a quantitative methodology used for evaluating and prioritizing various options, vendors, or investment opportunities by assigning differential importance (weights) to distinct criteria. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Precision-engineered metallic tracks house a textured block with a central threaded aperture. This visualizes a core RFQ execution component within an institutional market microstructure, enabling private quotation for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-framework-precision-microstructure-component.jpg)

## Rfp Evaluation

Meaning ▴ RFP Evaluation is the systematic and objective process of assessing and comparing the proposals submitted by various vendors in response to a Request for Proposal, with the ultimate goal of identifying the most suitable solution or service provider. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost-of-ownership/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Polished metallic blades, a central chrome sphere, and glossy teal/blue surfaces with a white sphere. This visualizes algorithmic trading precision for RFQ engine driven atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-engine-high-fidelity-digital-asset-atomic-execution-microstructure.jpg)

## Total Cost of Ownership

Meaning ▴ Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) is a comprehensive financial metric that quantifies the direct and indirect costs associated with acquiring, operating, and maintaining a product or system throughout its entire lifecycle. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-counterparty-performance-score-differ-from-a-traditional-credit-score/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precisely balanced transparent sphere, representing an atomic settlement or digital asset derivative, rests on a blue cross-structure symbolizing a robust RFQ protocol or execution management system. This setup is anchored to a textured, curved surface, depicting underlying market microstructure or institutional-grade infrastructure, enabling high-fidelity execution, optimized price discovery, and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-engineered-rfq-block-trade-execution-for-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

## Weighted Score

A counterparty performance score is a dynamic, multi-factor model of transactional reliability, distinct from a traditional credit score's historical debt focus. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, institutional-grade system processes a dynamic stream of market microstructure data, projecting a high-fidelity execution pathway for digital asset derivatives. This represents a private quotation RFQ protocol, optimizing price discovery and capital efficiency through an intelligence layer](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-rfq-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-microstructure-prime-os.jpg)

## Total Cost

Meaning ▴ Total Cost represents the aggregated sum of all expenditures incurred in a specific process, project, or acquisition, encompassing both direct and indirect financial outlays. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/system-integration/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Precisely aligned forms depict an institutional trading system's RFQ protocol interface. Circular elements symbolize market data feeds and price discovery for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-interface-optimization.jpg)

## System Integration

Meaning ▴ System Integration is the process of cohesively connecting disparate computing systems and software applications, whether physically or functionally, to operate as a unified and harmonious whole. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/api-strategy/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precise digital asset derivatives trading mechanism, featuring transparent data conduits symbolizing RFQ protocol execution and multi-leg spread strategies. Intricate gears visualize market microstructure, ensuring high-fidelity execution and robust price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-framework.jpg)

## Api Strategy

Meaning ▴ An API Strategy within the crypto domain represents a structured plan for the systematic design, deployment, and ongoing management of Application Programming Interfaces to facilitate programmatic access to blockchain data, trading platforms, and financial services. </a>

**Tags:** [Total Cost of Ownership](https://options.greeks.live/area/total-cost-of-ownership/), [RFP Scoring](https://options.greeks.live/area/rfp-scoring/), [Quantitative Vendor Analysis](https://options.greeks.live/area/quantitative-vendor-analysis/), [API Strategy](https://options.greeks.live/area/api-strategy/), [Vendor Selection](https://options.greeks.live/area/vendor-selection/), [Technology RFP](https://options.greeks.live/area/technology-rfp/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [How Do You Effectively Weight Non-Price Factors against Cost in an RFP Rubric?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-effectively-weight-non-price-factors-against-cost-in-an-rfp-rubric/)
![A multi-faceted crystalline form with sharp, radiating elements centers on a dark sphere, symbolizing complex market microstructure. This represents sophisticated RFQ protocols, aggregated inquiry, and high-fidelity execution across diverse liquidity pools, optimizing capital efficiency for institutional digital asset derivatives within a Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/rfq-protocols-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-price-discovery.jpg)

A rubric's weighting system translates strategic priorities into a quantitative model for value-based procurement decisions.

- 
### [What Are the Most Common Mistakes to Avoid When Creating Rfp Evaluation Criteria?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-mistakes-to-avoid-when-creating-rfp-evaluation-criteria/)
![Luminous central hub intersecting two sleek, symmetrical pathways, symbolizing a Principal's operational framework for institutional digital asset derivatives. Represents a liquidity pool facilitating atomic settlement via RFQ protocol streams for multi-leg spread execution, ensuring high-fidelity execution within a Crypto Derivatives OS.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-pathways-optimized.jpg)

An effective RFP evaluation framework translates strategic objectives into a quantifiable, bias-resistant decision model.

- 
### [How Do You Effectively Weight Evaluation Criteria in a Complex It Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-effectively-weight-evaluation-criteria-in-a-complex-it-rfp/)
![The central teal core signifies a Principal's Prime RFQ, routing RFQ protocols across modular arms. Metallic levers denote precise control over multi-leg spread execution and block trades. This framework ensures high-fidelity execution, optimal price discovery, and efficient management of latent liquidity for institutional digital asset derivatives.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principals-prime-os-rfq-system-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

A system for translating strategic priorities into a quantitative, defensible framework for high-stakes technology acquisition.

- 
### [Should the Cost Be the Most Heavily Weighted Criterion in an Rfp Evaluation?](https://options.greeks.live/question/should-the-cost-be-the-most-heavily-weighted-criterion-in-an-rfp-evaluation/)
![Two smooth, teal spheres, representing institutional liquidity pools, precisely balance a metallic object, symbolizing a block trade executed via RFQ protocol. This depicts high-fidelity execution, optimizing price discovery and capital efficiency within a Principal's operational framework for digital asset derivatives.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-execution-bridging-institutional-liquidity-pools-via-rfq-protocol-for-optimized-digital-asset-derivatives-price-discovery.jpg)

Cost should be a significant, but not dominant, criterion in an RFP evaluation, balanced against quality, service, and long-term value.

- 
### [What Are the Most Common Mistakes to Avoid When Setting Weights for Rfp Evaluation Criteria?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-mistakes-to-avoid-when-setting-weights-for-rfp-evaluation-criteria/)
![A sleek, white, semi-spherical Principal's operational framework opens to precise internal FIX Protocol components. A luminous, reflective blue sphere embodies an institutional-grade digital asset derivative, symbolizing optimal price discovery and a robust liquidity pool. This depicts high-fidelity execution of block trades through RFQ protocols in complex market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution-5.jpg)

A robust RFP evaluation system translates strategic intent into a defensible decision by weighting criteria to reflect true value over initial cost.

- 
### [What Is the Optimal Weighting Percentage for Cost in a Complex Technology Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-optimal-weighting-percentage-for-cost-in-a-complex-technology-rfp/)
![A precision optical system with a reflective lens embodies the Prime RFQ intelligence layer. Gray and green planes represent divergent RFQ protocols or multi-leg spread strategies for institutional digital asset derivatives, enabling high-fidelity execution and optimal price discovery within complex market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-intelligent-core-driving-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution-across-diverse-liquidity-pools-for-optimal-price-discovery.jpg)

The optimal cost weighting in a technology RFP is a dynamic output of a strategic system, not a fixed input.

- 
### [What Are the Best Practices for Defining the Scoring Scale in an RFP Evaluation Matrix?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-best-practices-for-defining-the-scoring-scale-in-an-rfp-evaluation-matrix/)
![A futuristic, metallic structure with reflective surfaces and a central optical mechanism, symbolizing a robust Prime RFQ for institutional digital asset derivatives. It enables high-fidelity execution of RFQ protocols, optimizing price discovery and liquidity aggregation across diverse liquidity pools with minimal slippage.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-platform-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-optimized-execution-management-system-with-robust-liquidity-sourcing.jpg)

A robust RFP scoring scale translates strategic priorities into a quantitative, defensible framework for objective vendor selection.

- 
### [What Is the Optimal Price Weighting to Balance Cost and Quality in an Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-optimal-price-weighting-to-balance-cost-and-quality-in-an-rfp/)
![A precision-engineered metallic institutional trading platform, bisected by an execution pathway, features a central blue RFQ protocol engine. This Crypto Derivatives OS core facilitates high-fidelity execution, optimal price discovery, and multi-leg spread trading, reflecting advanced market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-core-facilitating-rfq-protocol-driven-optimal-price-discovery-and-multi-leg-spread-trading-for-capital-efficiency.jpg)

The optimal RFP price-quality weighting is a strategic calibration that translates corporate priorities into a defensible, value-driven selection protocol.

- 
### [What Are the Most Critical Components of a Defensible RFP Evaluation Matrix?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-critical-components-of-a-defensible-rfp-evaluation-matrix/)
![A sophisticated apparatus, potentially a price discovery or volatility surface calibration tool. A blue needle with sphere and clamp symbolizes high-fidelity execution pathways and RFQ protocol integration within a Prime RFQ. This signifies precise algorithmic trading and risk management for digital asset derivatives, optimizing capital efficiency in market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocol-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

A defensible RFP evaluation matrix is a calibrated system for translating strategic priorities into a quantifiable, auditable, and objective procurement decision.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "How Can a Firm Create an Objective Scoring Model for a Pms Rfp?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-a-firm-create-an-objective-scoring-model-for-a-pms-rfp/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-a-firm-create-an-objective-scoring-model-for-a-pms-rfp/"
    },
    "headline": "How Can a Firm Create an Objective Scoring Model for a Pms Rfp? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "An objective PMS RFP scoring model codifies strategy into a data-driven framework for defensible technology acquisition. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-a-firm-create-an-objective-scoring-model-for-a-pms-rfp/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-09T22:12:12+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-10-30T21:36:16+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-rfq-protocol-engine-for-high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg",
        "caption": "A central dark hub with three reflective blades depicts an advanced Principal's operational framework for institutional digital asset derivatives. This system leverages market microstructure insights and aggregated liquidity via a sophisticated RFQ protocol engine. It facilitates high-fidelity execution of block trades and multi-leg spreads, driven by an intelligence layer and algorithmic trading. The framework optimizes price discovery and portfolio margin, ensuring capital efficiency and best execution for Bitcoin Options and Ethereum Futures."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "API Strategy",
        "Data-Driven Decision Making",
        "Performance Management System",
        "Quantitative Vendor Analysis",
        "RFP Evaluation",
        "RFP Evaluation Criteria",
        "RFP Scoring",
        "RFP Scoring Model",
        "Strategic Procurement",
        "Supplier Selection Matrix",
        "System Integration",
        "Technology RFP",
        "Total Cost",
        "Total Cost of Ownership",
        "Vendor Selection",
        "Weighted Scoring"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-a-firm-create-an-objective-scoring-model-for-a-pms-rfp/
