# How Can an Organization Determine the Appropriate Weights for Different RFP Scoring Criteria? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-07
**Categories:** Question

---

![A teal-colored digital asset derivative contract unit, representing an atomic trade, rests precisely on a textured, angled institutional trading platform. This suggests high-fidelity execution and optimized market microstructure for private quotation block trades within a secure Prime RFQ environment, minimizing slippage](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine-optimization.jpg)

![A sophisticated mechanism features a segmented disc, indicating dynamic market microstructure and liquidity pool partitioning. This system visually represents an RFQ protocol's price discovery process, crucial for high-fidelity execution of institutional digital asset derivatives and managing counterparty risk within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/advanced-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-liquidity-aggregation-system.jpg)

## Concept

Determining the appropriate weights for Request for Proposal (RFP) scoring criteria is the foundational act of translating an organization’s strategic intent into a quantifiable, defensible procurement decision. It is the mechanism by which abstract objectives ▴ such as technological modernization, operational resilience, or market expansion ▴ are converted into a precise evaluation framework. This process moves the selection of a vendor or partner from a realm of subjective preference into a structured system of analysis.

The weights assigned to each criterion function as the control parameters for a decision-making engine, calibrated to align with the most critical performance indicators for the organization. An uncalibrated or poorly weighted system introduces noise and ambiguity, risking a procurement outcome that is merely compliant on paper but misaligned with core business drivers.

The core of this exercise is the explicit acknowledgment that not all requirements are of equal importance. A seemingly minor criterion, if it supports a fundamental strategic pillar, may warrant a disproportionately high weight. For instance, in the procurement of a new cloud infrastructure, ‘data residency’ might appear as a simple checkbox item. For a financial institution governed by strict cross-border data regulations, this single criterion is a non-negotiable strategic imperative.

Its weight, therefore, must reflect its capacity to introduce catastrophic regulatory risk if unmet. The weighting process compels an organization to have an internal dialogue, forcing stakeholders to confront and codify their priorities. This act of codification is itself a valuable output, creating a clear and documented rationale that underpins the final decision.

Viewing this process through a systems lens, the [RFP criteria](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-criteria/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) and their corresponding weights form a protocol for resource allocation. The organization is allocating a significant resource ▴ a contract, and by extension, capital and operational dependency ▴ to an external entity. The weighting system is the primary control for ensuring this allocation is optimized to produce the maximum strategic return.

A well-designed system is resilient, repeatable, and transparent, capable of processing diverse inputs (vendor proposals) and generating a consistent, logical output (a ranked list of bidders). It transforms the RFP from a simple procurement document into an instrument of corporate strategy, where every percentage point of weight is a direct reflection of a stated organizational goal.

![Robust institutional Prime RFQ core connects to a precise RFQ protocol engine. Multi-leg spread execution blades propel a digital asset derivative target, optimizing price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-proto-insti-digital-asset-derivs-hi-fi-exec-capital-effi-risk-mgmt.jpg)

![A metallic cylindrical component, suggesting robust Prime RFQ infrastructure, interacts with a luminous teal-blue disc representing a dynamic liquidity pool for digital asset derivatives. A precise golden bar diagonally traverses, symbolizing an RFQ-driven block trade path, enabling high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement within complex market microstructure for institutional grade operations](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-execution-protocols-navigating-digital-asset-derivatives-market-microstructure-for-optimal-block-trade-liquidity.jpg)

## Strategy

Developing a strategic framework for weighting RFP criteria requires moving beyond simple point allocation to a deliberate, methodical approach that connects every weight to a measurable business outcome. The strategy chosen dictates the character of the evaluation; it determines whether the focus is on cost containment, technical excellence, risk mitigation, or a sophisticated balance of all three. A robust strategy ensures the weighting is not an arbitrary exercise but a direct expression of the organization’s priorities, creating a clear line of sight from a high-level corporate objective to a specific scoring criterion.

> A successful weighting strategy transforms the subjective preferences of stakeholders into a unified, objective, and defensible evaluation model.

![A precision-engineered control mechanism, featuring a ribbed dial and prominent green indicator, signifies Institutional Grade Digital Asset Derivatives RFQ Protocol optimization. This represents High-Fidelity Execution, Price Discovery, and Volatility Surface calibration for Algorithmic Trading](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-operational-framework-precision-calibration-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-execution-prime-os-and-volatility-surface-optimization.jpg)

## Systematic Frameworks for Weight Allocation

Three primary strategic frameworks provide structured pathways for determining criteria weights ▴ [Top-Down Strategic Alignment](https://prime.greeks.live/question/can-smaller-enterprises-benefit-from-a-scaled-down-centralized-treasury-model/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), [Risk-Based Calibration](https://prime.greeks.live/area/risk-based-calibration/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), and Consensus-Driven Modeling. Each offers a distinct methodology for translating organizational priorities into a quantitative scoring system. The selection of a framework, or a hybrid of them, depends on the nature of the procurement, the complexity of the requirements, and the organization’s own decision-making culture.

![A sleek, bi-component digital asset derivatives engine reveals its intricate core, symbolizing an advanced RFQ protocol. This Prime RFQ component enables high-fidelity execution and optimal price discovery within complex market microstructure, managing latent liquidity for institutional operations](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimal-execution.jpg)

## Top-Down Strategic Alignment

This approach begins with the organization’s highest-level strategic goals. The [evaluation committee](https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-committee/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) first identifies the primary business drivers for the procurement. These could be objectives like “Reduce [Total Cost of Ownership](https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost-of-ownership/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) by 15% over five years,” “Enhance Cybersecurity Posture to meet ISO 27001 standards,” or “Improve supply chain efficiency.” Each strategic goal is assigned a portion of the total 100% weight. These high-level weights are then cascaded down to the relevant categories and individual criteria within the RFP.

For example, the goal of reducing TCO would directly inform the weights for criteria related to initial purchase price, implementation costs, ongoing maintenance fees, and operational efficiency gains. This method ensures that the final scoring model is a direct reflection of the business case that justified the procurement in the first place.

![A gold-hued precision instrument with a dark, sharp interface engages a complex circuit board, symbolizing high-fidelity execution within institutional market microstructure. This visual metaphor represents a sophisticated RFQ protocol facilitating private quotation and atomic settlement for digital asset derivatives, optimizing capital efficiency and mitigating counterparty risk](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-grade-precision-execution-engine-optimizing-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-within-market-microstructure.jpg)

## Risk-Based Calibration

Here, the primary driver for weighting is the identification and mitigation of potential risks. The evaluation team conducts a risk assessment, identifying all potential negative outcomes associated with a poor vendor selection. These risks are categorized (e.g. financial, operational, technical, reputational, security) and then quantified in terms of probability and impact. Criteria that directly address high-impact, high-probability risks are assigned the highest weights.

For instance, in selecting a software-as-a-service (SaaS) provider, the risk of a data breach is a paramount concern. Consequently, criteria under the “Information Security” category ▴ such as encryption standards, access controls, and incident response plans ▴ would receive a significant portion of the total weight, far exceeding criteria related to user interface aesthetics, for example.

![An abstract system visualizes an institutional RFQ protocol. A central translucent sphere represents the Prime RFQ intelligence layer, aggregating liquidity for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-maximizing-liquidity.jpg)

## Consensus-Driven Modeling

When a procurement involves a diverse group of stakeholders with potentially conflicting priorities, a consensus-driven approach is essential for building buy-in and creating a balanced evaluation. The most powerful technique for this is the [Analytic Hierarchy Process](https://prime.greeks.live/area/analytic-hierarchy-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (AHP), a [multi-criteria decision analysis](https://prime.greeks.live/area/multi-criteria-decision-analysis/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) method developed by Thomas Saaty. AHP structures the decision problem into a hierarchy, starting with the overall goal, followed by criteria, and then alternatives. The core of the process involves stakeholders making a series of pairwise comparisons between criteria.

For example, a stakeholder would be asked ▴ “Is ‘Technical Capability’ more important than ‘Price’?” and to what degree (e.g. equally, moderately, strongly, very strongly, or extremely more important). These judgments are converted into numerical values and processed through matrix algebra to derive the final weights for each criterion. The key benefit of AHP is its ability to quantify subjective judgments and check for inconsistencies in the decision-makers’ logic, leading to a highly robust and defensible set of weights.

![A central, metallic, multi-bladed mechanism, symbolizing a core execution engine or RFQ hub, emits luminous teal data streams. These streams traverse through fragmented, transparent structures, representing dynamic market microstructure, high-fidelity price discovery, and liquidity aggregation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-grade-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-facilitating-high-fidelity-execution-and-optimal-price-discovery-across-fragmented-market-microstructure.jpg)

## Comparative Analysis of Weighting Strategies

The choice of strategy has significant implications for the procurement process and its outcome. The following table provides a comparative analysis of the three primary frameworks.

| Framework | Core Principle | Primary Application | Key Advantage | Potential Challenge |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Top-Down Strategic Alignment | Weights are derived directly from high-level business objectives. | Procurements that are central to corporate strategy (e.g. ERP systems, major infrastructure projects). | Ensures the final decision is directly tied to and supports the organization’s mission. | May overlook critical operational or technical details if strategic goals are too broad. |
| Risk-Based Calibration | Weights are proportional to the magnitude of the risk each criterion mitigates. | Sourcing in highly regulated industries or for mission-critical services (e.g. financial processing, healthcare systems). | Creates a highly defensible model focused on organizational resilience and stability. | Can lead to an overly conservative selection, potentially sacrificing innovation for safety. |
| Consensus-Driven Modeling (AHP) | Weights are mathematically derived from the collective judgment of stakeholders. | Complex procurements with multiple departments and conflicting stakeholder needs. | Produces a mathematically robust, transparent, and collaborative outcome that fosters buy-in. | Process can be time-consuming and requires a skilled facilitator to manage stakeholder inputs. |

![Translucent, overlapping geometric shapes symbolize dynamic liquidity aggregation within an institutional grade RFQ protocol. Central elements represent the execution management system's focal point for precise price discovery and atomic settlement of multi-leg spread digital asset derivatives, revealing complex market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-driving-optimal-liquidity-aggregation-for-precise-price-discovery-and-atomic-settlement.jpg)

![A sleek, futuristic mechanism showcases a large reflective blue dome with intricate internal gears, connected by precise metallic bars to a smaller sphere. This embodies an institutional-grade Crypto Derivatives OS, optimizing RFQ protocols for high-fidelity execution, managing liquidity pools, and enabling efficient price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-facilitating-high-fidelity-execution-and-optimal-market-microstructure-with-prime-os-intelligence.jpg)

## Execution

The execution phase of weighting RFP criteria translates strategic intent into a precise, operational, and auditable scoring mechanism. This is where abstract priorities are forged into the hard numbers that will drive the final decision. A disciplined execution ensures that the process is not only rigorous but also transparent and defensible to all participants, including internal auditors and unsuccessful bidders. It requires a meticulous, step-by-step approach, robust quantitative tools, and a clear understanding of how different weighting schemes can alter the outcome.

![A sleek, spherical, off-white device with a glowing cyan lens symbolizes an Institutional Grade Prime RFQ Intelligence Layer. It drives High-Fidelity Execution of Digital Asset Derivatives via RFQ Protocols, enabling Optimal Liquidity Aggregation and Price Discovery for Market Microstructure Analysis](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimal-execution-1.jpg)

## The Operational Playbook for Weighting

A systematic process for defining and assigning weights is essential for consistency and rigor. The following operational playbook outlines a structured sequence of actions for an evaluation committee.

- 
**Establish the Evaluation Committee Charter** ▴ The process begins with the formal chartering of the evaluation committee. This document should define the committee’s membership, roles, responsibilities, and decision-making authority. It must also explicitly state the strategic objectives of the procurement, as these will serve as the foundation for the weighting strategy.

- 
**Conduct a Criteria Brainstorming and Categorization Workshop** ▴ The committee convenes to brainstorm all possible evaluation criteria. No idea is discarded initially. Subsequently, these criteria are grouped into logical, hierarchical categories.
For example, individual criteria like ‘data encryption’, ‘access control’, and ‘disaster recovery’ would be grouped under the parent category of ‘Security’. This hierarchical structure is fundamental for methods like AHP.

- 
**Select and Implement the Weighting Methodology** ▴ Based on the strategic framework chosen (Top-Down, Risk-Based, or Consensus-Driven), the committee implements the specific weighting technique. If using AHP, this is the stage where stakeholders perform pairwise comparisons. If using a Top-Down approach, senior leadership provides the high-level percentage allocations for the main categories.

- 
**Perform Normalization and Sanity Checks** ▴ Once the initial weights are calculated, they must be normalized to sum to 100%. The committee then conducts a sanity check. Do the weights make intuitive sense?
Does the 30% weight on ‘Technical Solution’ accurately reflect its importance relative to the 20% weight on ‘Cost’? This is a critical moment for qualitative review of the quantitative output.

- 
**Finalize and Document the Rationale** ▴ The final weights are approved by the committee. Crucially, the entire process, including the rationale for the chosen strategy, the inputs from stakeholders, and the final weight for each criterion, must be meticulously documented. This documentation is the cornerstone of a defensible and transparent procurement process.

![A transparent, angular teal object with an embedded dark circular lens rests on a light surface. This visualizes an institutional-grade RFQ engine, enabling high-fidelity execution and precise price discovery for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-engine-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Quantitative Modeling and Data Analysis

The [Analytic Hierarchy](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-analytic-hierarchy-process-improve-objectivity-in-kpi-weighting/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) Process (AHP) provides the most robust quantitative model for this execution. It converts qualitative stakeholder judgments into a set of mathematically sound weights. The process involves creating a [pairwise comparison](https://prime.greeks.live/area/pairwise-comparison/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) matrix for each set of criteria.

> The AHP model’s true power lies in its ability to expose and quantify inconsistencies in judgment, forcing a more rational and coherent evaluation framework.

Consider a simplified AHP matrix for a procurement of a new CRM system. The main criteria are ▴ Technical Fit, Cost, [Vendor Viability](https://prime.greeks.live/area/vendor-viability/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), and [Implementation Support](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-can-a-firm-operationally-prepare-for-the-implementation-of-a-new-credit-support-annex/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). Stakeholders compare each pair on a scale of 1 (equally important) to 9 (extremely more important).

### Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Pairwise Comparison Matrix

| Criterion | Technical Fit | Cost | Vendor Viability | Implementation Support |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Technical Fit | 1 | 3 | 2 | 4 |
| Cost | 1/3 | 1 | 1/2 | 2 |
| Vendor Viability | 1/2 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Implementation Support | 1/4 | 1/2 | 1/3 | 1 |

From this matrix, a priority vector (the weights) is calculated using eigenvalue methods. The resulting weights might be ▴ [Technical Fit](https://prime.greeks.live/area/technical-fit/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (45%), Vendor Viability (28%), Cost (17%), and Implementation Support (10%). This quantitative output is a direct result of the structured judgments made by the team.

![An exposed high-fidelity execution engine reveals the complex market microstructure of an institutional-grade crypto derivatives OS. Precision components facilitate smart order routing and multi-leg spread strategies](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-microstructure-2.jpg)

## Predictive Scenario Analysis

The strategic importance of weighting is most evident when analyzing how different schemes affect the final outcome. Imagine two vendors bidding for the CRM contract. Vendor A has a superior technical product but is more expensive. Vendor B has a less feature-rich product but is highly cost-effective and offers excellent support.

- **Scenario 1 ▴ Technology-Focused Weighting** ▴ Using the AHP-derived weights (Tech Fit 45%, Cost 17%), Vendor A’s high score in the most heavily weighted category would almost certainly secure them the contract, despite their higher price. The organization prioritizes long-term capability over short-term budget concerns. 

- **Scenario 2 ▴ Cost-Focused Weighting** ▴ If the committee had instead used a simple Top-Down approach driven by a mandate to cut costs, the weights might have been reversed (e.g. Cost 40%, Tech Fit 20%). In this scenario, Vendor B’s significant price advantage would likely lead to them winning the contract, even with a technically inferior solution. 

This analysis demonstrates that the weighting process is not a passive administrative step. It is an active, strategic choice that directly shapes the future of the organization by pre-selecting the type of partner and solution that will be favored. The weights are, in effect, a predictive model of the organization’s future priorities.

![Metallic platter signifies core market infrastructure. A precise blue instrument, representing RFQ protocol for institutional digital asset derivatives, targets a green block, signifying a large block trade](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine-market-microstructure-optimization-for-alpha-generation.jpg)

## References

- Saaty, Thomas L. _The Analytic Hierarchy Process ▴ Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation_. McGraw-Hill, 1980.

- Vaidya, Omkarprasad S. and Sushil Kumar. “Analytic hierarchy process ▴ An overview of applications.” _European Journal of Operational Research_, vol. 169, no. 1, 2006, pp. 1-29.

- Forman, Ernest H. and Saul I. Gass. “The analytic hierarchy process ▴ an exposition.” _Operations Research_, vol. 49, no. 4, 2001, pp. 469-486.

- Ho, William. “Integrated analytic k-means and analytic hierarchy process for fuzzy multi-criteria decision making.” _European Journal of Operational Research_, vol. 187, no. 1, 2008, pp. 193-211.

- Bhushan, Navin, and Kanwal Rai. _Strategic Decision Making ▴ Applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process_. Springer Science & Business Media, 2004.

- Harris, Larry. _Trading and Exchanges ▴ Market Microstructure for Practitioners_. Oxford University Press, 2003.

- Darko, Amos, et al. “A review of the application of analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in the construction industry.” _International Journal of Construction Management_, vol. 19, no. 5, 2019, pp. 436-452.

- Subramanian, Nachiappan, and R. Ramanathan. “A review of applications of Analytic Hierarchy Process in operations management.” _International Journal of Production Economics_, vol. 138, no. 2, 2012, pp. 215-241.

![A sleek metallic teal execution engine, representing a Crypto Derivatives OS, interfaces with a luminous pre-trade analytics display. This abstract view depicts institutional RFQ protocols enabling high-fidelity execution for multi-leg spreads, optimizing market microstructure and atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/advanced-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-market-microstructure-analysis.jpg)

## Reflection

The construction of an RFP weighting model is ultimately an exercise in organizational self-awareness. The final set of weights is a numerical reflection of the institution’s values, its appetite for risk, and its strategic aspirations. It forces a conversation that translates ambiguous goals into a concrete [decision-making framework](https://prime.greeks.live/area/decision-making-framework/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite).

The process itself, when executed with rigor, yields a benefit far beyond the selection of a single vendor. It creates a reusable intellectual asset ▴ a decision protocol that can be adapted, refined, and redeployed for future strategic procurements.

Consider the completed model not as a static endpoint, but as the first iteration of a dynamic system. How will the performance of the selected vendor, measured against the criteria that elevated them, inform the weighting of the next RFP? This feedback loop ▴ from weighting, to selection, to performance measurement, and back to weighting ▴ is the hallmark of an intelligent and adaptive procurement function.

It transforms sourcing from a series of discrete transactions into a continuous process of strategic learning and optimization. The true mastery of this discipline lies in viewing each RFP as an opportunity to refine the engine of decision itself.

![A luminous central hub with radiating arms signifies an institutional RFQ protocol engine. It embodies seamless liquidity aggregation and high-fidelity execution for multi-leg spread strategies](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-hub-for-optimal-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-criteria/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, futuristic object with a glowing line and intricate metallic core, symbolizing a Prime RFQ for institutional digital asset derivatives. It represents a sophisticated RFQ protocol engine enabling high-fidelity execution, liquidity aggregation, atomic settlement, and capital efficiency for multi-leg spreads](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/advanced-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine-for-optimal-liquidity-aggregation-and-atomic-settlement.jpg)

## Rfp Criteria

Meaning ▴ RFP Criteria represent the meticulously defined quantitative and qualitative specifications issued by an institutional principal to evaluate potential counterparties or technology solutions for digital asset derivatives trading, establishing the foundational parameters for competitive assessment and strategic alignment. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/can-smaller-enterprises-benefit-from-a-scaled-down-centralized-treasury-model/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Precision cross-section of an institutional digital asset derivatives system, revealing intricate market microstructure. Toroidal halves represent interconnected liquidity pools, centrally driven by an RFQ protocol](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-architecture-revealing-precision-rfq-protocol-engine-for-optimal-high-fidelity-execution-and-latent-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## Top-Down Strategic Alignment

A scaled-down centralized treasury provides SMEs with the systemic architecture for superior capital control and operational efficiency. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/risk-based-calibration/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A pristine teal sphere, representing a high-fidelity digital asset, emerges from concentric layers of a sophisticated principal's operational framework. These layers symbolize market microstructure, aggregated liquidity pools, and RFQ protocol mechanisms ensuring best execution and optimal price discovery within an institutional-grade crypto derivatives OS](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-core-2.jpg)

## Risk-Based Calibration

Meaning ▴ Risk-Based Calibration refers to the dynamic adjustment of system parameters, particularly within trading and risk management frameworks, based on a continuous assessment of prevailing market risk conditions and internal risk appetite. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost-of-ownership/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A polished spherical form representing a Prime Brokerage platform features a precisely engineered RFQ engine. This mechanism facilitates high-fidelity execution for institutional Digital Asset Derivatives, enabling private quotation and optimal price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-engine-optimal-execution-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

## Total Cost of Ownership

Meaning ▴ Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) represents a comprehensive financial estimate encompassing all direct and indirect expenditures associated with an asset or system throughout its entire operational lifecycle. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-committee/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![The image displays a central circular mechanism, representing the core of an RFQ engine, surrounded by concentric layers signifying market microstructure and liquidity pool aggregation. A diagonal element intersects, symbolizing direct high-fidelity execution pathways for digital asset derivatives, optimized for capital efficiency and best execution through a Prime RFQ architecture](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-architecture-powering-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-high-fidelity-execution-via-optimized-rfq-protocols.jpg)

## Evaluation Committee

Meaning ▴ An Evaluation Committee constitutes a formally constituted internal governance body responsible for the systematic assessment of proposals, solutions, or counterparties, ensuring alignment with an institution's strategic objectives and operational parameters within the digital asset ecosystem. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/multi-criteria-decision-analysis/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Polished opaque and translucent spheres intersect sharp metallic structures. This abstract composition represents advanced RFQ protocols for institutional digital asset derivatives, illustrating multi-leg spread execution, latent liquidity aggregation, and high-fidelity execution within principal-driven trading environments](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-optimal-execution-orchestration.jpg)

## Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis

Meaning ▴ Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, or MCDA, represents a structured computational framework designed for evaluating and ranking complex alternatives against a multitude of conflicting objectives. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/analytic-hierarchy-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Intersecting sleek conduits, one with precise water droplets, a reflective sphere, and a dark blade. This symbolizes institutional RFQ protocol for high-fidelity execution, navigating market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-framework-optimizing-latent-liquidity-discovery-and-atomic-settlement-protocols.jpg)

## Analytic Hierarchy Process

Meaning ▴ The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) constitutes a structured methodology for organizing and analyzing complex decision problems, particularly those involving multiple, often conflicting, criteria and subjective judgments. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/pairwise-comparison/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A central control knob on a metallic platform, bisected by sharp reflective lines, embodies an institutional RFQ protocol. This depicts intricate market microstructure, enabling high-fidelity execution, precise price discovery for multi-leg options, and robust Prime RFQ deployment, optimizing latent liquidity across digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-rfq-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-engine-core-microstructure.jpg)

## Pairwise Comparison

Meaning ▴ Pairwise Comparison is a systematic method for evaluating entities by comparing them two at a time, across a defined set of criteria, to establish a relative preference or value. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-analytic-hierarchy-process-improve-objectivity-in-kpi-weighting/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Translucent spheres, embodying institutional counterparties, reveal complex internal algorithmic logic. Sharp lines signify high-fidelity execution and RFQ protocols, connecting these liquidity pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-optimal-execution-engine.jpg)

## Analytic Hierarchy

The Analytic Hierarchy Process improves objectivity by structuring decisions and using pairwise comparisons to create transparent, consistent KPI weights. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-can-a-firm-operationally-prepare-for-the-implementation-of-a-new-credit-support-annex/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sophisticated digital asset derivatives RFQ engine's core components are depicted, showcasing precise market microstructure for optimal price discovery. Its central hub facilitates algorithmic trading, ensuring high-fidelity execution across multi-leg spreads](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimizing-multi-leg-spreads-for-optimal-capital-efficiency.jpg)

## Implementation Support

A firm prepares for a new CSA by architecting an integrated system of legal, operational, and technological protocols to manage collateral dynamically. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/vendor-viability/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sophisticated institutional digital asset derivatives platform unveils its core market microstructure. Intricate circuitry powers a central blue spherical RFQ protocol engine on a polished circular surface](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-unveiling-rfq-protocol-engine-market-microstructure-for-optimal-price-discovery-and-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Vendor Viability

Meaning ▴ Vendor Viability defines the comprehensive assessment of a technology provider's enduring capacity to deliver and sustain critical services for institutional operations, particularly within the demanding context of institutional digital asset derivatives. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/technical-fit/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A central, metallic hub anchors four symmetrical radiating arms, two with vibrant, textured teal illumination. This depicts a Principal's high-fidelity execution engine, facilitating private quotation and aggregated inquiry for institutional digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols, optimizing market microstructure and deep liquidity pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-brokerage-digital-asset-rfq-execution-engine-microstructure.jpg)

## Technical Fit

Meaning ▴ Technical Fit represents the precise congruence of a technological solution's capabilities with the specific functional and non-functional requirements of an institutional trading or operational workflow within the digital asset derivatives landscape. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/decision-making-framework/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Central mechanical pivot with a green linear element diagonally traversing, depicting a robust RFQ protocol engine for institutional digital asset derivatives. This signifies high-fidelity execution of aggregated inquiry and price discovery, ensuring capital efficiency within complex market microstructure and order book dynamics](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-best-execution.jpg)

## Decision-Making Framework

Meaning ▴ A Decision-Making Framework represents a codified, systematic methodology designed to process inputs and generate optimal outputs for complex financial operations within institutional digital asset derivatives. </a>

**Tags:** [Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis](https://options.greeks.live/area/multi-criteria-decision-analysis/), [Strategic Sourcing](https://options.greeks.live/area/strategic-sourcing/), [Total Cost of Ownership](https://options.greeks.live/area/total-cost-of-ownership/), [Vendor Viability](https://options.greeks.live/area/vendor-viability/), [Procurement Strategy](https://options.greeks.live/area/procurement-strategy/), [Analytic Hierarchy Process](https://options.greeks.live/area/analytic-hierarchy-process/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [How Do You Avoid Subjectivity When Weighting Rfp Criteria?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-avoid-subjectivity-when-weighting-rfp-criteria/)
![A stacked, multi-colored modular system representing an institutional digital asset derivatives platform. The top unit facilitates RFQ protocol initiation and dynamic price discovery. Central modules signify the core execution engine and aggregated liquidity. The base unit manages atomic settlement, optimizing capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine-15.jpg)

Constructing a quantitative evaluation framework translates strategic priorities into a defensible, data-driven vendor selection protocol.

- 
### [How Can Sensitivity Analysis Prevent Over-Reliance on Price in Rfp Evaluations?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-sensitivity-analysis-prevent-over-reliance-on-price-in-rfp-evaluations/)
![Sleek, metallic form with precise lines represents a robust Institutional Grade Prime RFQ for Digital Asset Derivatives. The prominent, reflective blue dome symbolizes an Intelligence Layer for Price Discovery and Market Microstructure visibility, enabling High-Fidelity Execution via RFQ protocols.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/prime-os-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-engine.jpg)

Sensitivity analysis prevents price over-reliance by modeling how a proposal's total value shifts under operational and financial stress.

- 
### [What Are the Most Effective Methods for Quantifying and Comparing Qualitative Criteria in an Rfp Evaluation?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-effective-methods-for-quantifying-and-comparing-qualitative-criteria-in-an-rfp-evaluation/)
![A central metallic lens with glowing green concentric circles, flanked by curved grey shapes, embodies an institutional-grade digital asset derivatives platform. It signifies high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols, price discovery, and algorithmic trading within market microstructure, central to a principal's operational framework.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system-view.jpg)

Effective methods for quantifying qualitative RFP criteria involve a weighted scoring system within a defensible decision intelligence framework.

- 
### [How Should an Organization Determine the Appropriate Weights for Different Criteria in an RFP Scorecard?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-should-an-organization-determine-the-appropriate-weights-for-different-criteria-in-an-rfp-scorecard/)
![A sophisticated teal and black device with gold accents symbolizes a Principal's operational framework for institutional digital asset derivatives. It represents a high-fidelity execution engine, integrating RFQ protocols for atomic settlement. This intelligence layer optimizes price discovery, managing portfolio margin and ensuring best execution in market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-core-engine-for-best-execution.jpg)

Determining RFP scorecard weights is the strategic translation of corporate priorities into a quantitative, defensible decision engine.

- 
### [What Are the Most Common Pitfalls in Designing an Rfp Scoring Rubric?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-pitfalls-in-designing-an-rfp-scoring-rubric/)
![A beige Prime RFQ chassis features a glowing teal transparent panel, symbolizing an Intelligence Layer for high-fidelity execution. A clear tube, representing a private quotation channel, holds a precise instrument for algorithmic trading of digital asset derivatives, ensuring atomic settlement.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-digital-asset-derivatives-high-fidelity-execution-system-interface.jpg)

The most common pitfalls in designing an RFP scoring rubric stem from a failure to strategically align weighting with project value and to implement clear, objective criteria, leading to biased and indefensible selection outcomes.

- 
### [What Are the Most Common Mistakes to Avoid When Assigning Weights to Rfp Criteria?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-mistakes-to-avoid-when-assigning-weights-to-rfp-criteria/)
![Precision instruments, resembling calibration tools, intersect over a central geared mechanism. This metaphor illustrates the intricate market microstructure and price discovery for institutional digital asset derivatives. It highlights the analytical rigor of RFQ protocols ensuring high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency across dark pools.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-engine-microstructure-analytics.jpg)

Assigning RFP weights translates strategic intent into a quantitative system, making vendor selection a defensible and aligned decision.

- 
### [What Are the Most Effective Methods for Normalizing Price and Quality Scores in an RFP?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-effective-methods-for-normalizing-price-and-quality-scores-in-an-rfp/)
![A metallic disc, reminiscent of a sophisticated market interface, features two precise pointers radiating from a glowing central hub. This visualizes RFQ protocols driving price discovery within institutional digital asset derivatives. It highlights market microstructure dynamics, high-fidelity execution, and algorithmic trading strategies for capital efficiency and alpha generation in options trading.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-price-discovery.jpg)

Effective RFP score normalization transforms subjective evaluations and disparate data into a unified, objective framework for value-based decision-making.

- 
### [How Should an Organization Determine the Appropriate Weights for Different RFP Criteria?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-should-an-organization-determine-the-appropriate-weights-for-different-rfp-criteria/)
![Two distinct, interlocking institutional-grade system modules, one teal, one beige, symbolize integrated Crypto Derivatives OS components. The beige module features a price discovery lens, while the teal represents high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement, embodying capital efficiency within RFQ protocols for multi-leg spread strategies.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-modules.jpg)

Determining RFP criteria weights is a strategic process of encoding business priorities into a quantitative model to enable objective, data-driven vendor selection.

- 
### [What Is the Most Effective Way to Assign Weights to Different Rfp Evaluation Criteria?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-most-effective-way-to-assign-weights-to-different-rfp-evaluation-criteria/)
![A translucent blue sphere is precisely centered within beige, dark, and teal channels. This depicts RFQ protocol for digital asset derivatives, enabling high-fidelity execution of a block trade within a controlled market microstructure, ensuring atomic settlement and price discovery on a Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-execution-pathway-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-leveraging-rfq-protocols-and-high-fidelity-market-microstructure.jpg)

The most effective way to assign weights to RFP criteria is to use a structured, collaborative process that translates strategic goals into a quantitative, defensible evaluation model.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "How Can an Organization Determine the Appropriate Weights for Different RFP Scoring Criteria?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-determine-the-appropriate-weights-for-different-rfp-scoring-criteria/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-determine-the-appropriate-weights-for-different-rfp-scoring-criteria/"
    },
    "headline": "How Can an Organization Determine the Appropriate Weights for Different RFP Scoring Criteria? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "RFP criteria weighting is the precise calibration of a strategic decision engine to convert organizational objectives into optimal procurement outcomes. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-determine-the-appropriate-weights-for-different-rfp-scoring-criteria/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-07T06:39:55+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-08-07T06:39:56+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-os-rfq-engine-for-digital-asset-derivatives-high-fidelity-execution-optimal-liquidity-aggregation.jpg",
        "caption": "This beige cylindrical component, featuring a teal-green inner disc and central dark aperture, symbolizes the cutting-edge Prime RFQ. As a robust RFQ protocol engine for institutional digital Asset Derivatives, it ensures high-fidelity execution, deep liquidity aggregation, and precise price discovery. Minimizing slippage and adverse selection, it facilitates atomic settlement and multi-leg spread trading, empowering system specialists with an intelligence layer for optimal alpha generation."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Analytic Hierarchy Process",
        "Decision-Making Framework",
        "Evaluation Committee",
        "Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis",
        "Pairwise Comparison",
        "Procurement Strategy",
        "Quantitative Scoring Model",
        "RFP Criteria",
        "RFP Evaluation Committee",
        "Risk-Based Calibration",
        "Strategic Sourcing",
        "Technical Fit",
        "Total Cost of Ownership",
        "Vendor Risk Management",
        "Vendor Viability"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-determine-the-appropriate-weights-for-different-rfp-scoring-criteria/
