# How Can an Organization Effectively Prioritize Its Requirements in an ERP RFP? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-07
**Categories:** Question

---

![A macro view reveals the intricate mechanical core of an institutional-grade system, symbolizing the market microstructure of digital asset derivatives trading. Interlocking components and a precision gear suggest high-fidelity execution and algorithmic trading within an RFQ protocol framework, enabling price discovery and liquidity aggregation for multi-leg spreads on a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system-precision-engine.jpg)

![A multi-faceted digital asset derivative, precisely calibrated on a sophisticated circular mechanism. This represents a Prime Brokerage's robust RFQ protocol for high-fidelity execution of multi-leg spreads, ensuring optimal price discovery and minimal slippage within complex market microstructure, critical for alpha generation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-precision-2.jpg)

## Concept

The formulation of a Request for Proposal (RFP) for an [Enterprise Resource Planning](https://prime.greeks.live/area/enterprise-resource-planning/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (ERP) system represents a critical inflection point for an organization. It is the architectural process of translating a complex, multi-dimensional system of business needs, operational workflows, and strategic ambitions into a coherent, legible specification. This document serves as the foundational blueprint from which potential technology partners will design their proposed solutions. The immense challenge lies in moving beyond a simple aggregation of departmental wish lists to engineer a truly prioritized set of requirements that reflects the organization’s core strategic drivers.

Viewing this process through a systems lens, the RFP is an output generated from a confluence of inputs ▴ stakeholder demands, regulatory constraints, technical debt, and future growth vectors. The act of prioritization, therefore, is an exercise in system optimization. It is the mechanism for applying strategic weighting to each potential component, ensuring that the resulting configuration delivers maximum value to the entire enterprise, not just its individual parts. An unprioritized list of requirements invites vendor responses that are broad, unfocused, and difficult to compare, leading to a selection process clouded by ambiguity.

A precisely calibrated requirements list, conversely, elicits targeted, high-fidelity proposals that enable a clear, data-driven evaluation. This initial phase of architectural design dictates the ultimate success of the [ERP implementation](https://prime.greeks.live/area/erp-implementation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), defining its capacity to function as a central nervous system for the business rather than a collection of disparate, inefficient appendages.

> Effective ERP requirement prioritization transforms a vendor selection process from a subjective comparison into a disciplined, strategic engineering exercise.

The core of this undertaking is the codification of value. Every requirement, from a high-level functional demand for real-time financial consolidation to a granular technical need for a specific API endpoint, carries an implicit value to the organization. The task is to make this value explicit, measurable, and comparable. This involves a rigorous interrogation of each requirement to understand its linkage to overarching business objectives.

A request for a custom dashboard is a low-value item on its own; a request for a custom dashboard that provides real-time visibility into supply chain disruptions for a logistics company becomes a high-value strategic asset. The prioritization framework is the tool that facilitates this transformation from qualitative desire to quantitative, defensible priority.

![A sophisticated dark-hued institutional-grade digital asset derivatives platform interface, featuring a glowing aperture symbolizing active RFQ price discovery and high-fidelity execution. The integrated intelligence layer facilitates atomic settlement and multi-leg spread processing, optimizing market microstructure for prime brokerage operations and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-crypto-derivatives-rfq-engine-intelligence-layer.jpg)

![A precise mechanical instrument with intersecting transparent and opaque hands, representing the intricate market microstructure of institutional digital asset derivatives. This visual metaphor highlights dynamic price discovery and bid-ask spread dynamics within RFQ protocols, emphasizing high-fidelity execution and latent liquidity through a robust Prime RFQ for atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineering-driving-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-across-advanced-rfq-protocols-and-prime-brokerage-frameworks.jpg)

## Strategy

Developing a strategic framework for prioritizing ERP requirements is essential for ensuring the final RFP is a precise instrument of corporate strategy. Several methodologies exist to structure this process, each offering a different lens through which to view and weigh the value of potential system functionalities. These frameworks provide a disciplined alternative to the political horse-trading that can often dominate internal requirements-gathering sessions. By applying a systematic approach, an organization can build consensus around a set of priorities grounded in strategic objectives and operational realities.

![A split spherical mechanism reveals intricate internal components. This symbolizes an Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives Prime RFQ, enabling high-fidelity RFQ protocol execution, optimal price discovery, and atomic settlement for block trades and multi-leg spreads](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-revealing-rfq-execution-core-mechanics.jpg)

## Foundational Classification Systems

The initial step in many prioritization efforts involves sorting requirements into broad categories of importance. This creates a high-level structure that informs all subsequent, more granular analysis.

- 
**The [MoSCoW Method](https://prime.greeks.live/area/moscow-method/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)** ▴ This technique provides a simple yet effective four-part classification system. It compels stakeholders to make definitive judgments about the necessity of each requirement.

<li>**Must-Haves** ▴ These are non-negotiable requirements. The system is considered a failure if these are not met. They often relate to core business operations, legal mandates, or security protocols.

- **Should-Haves** ▴ These are important requirements that are not critical for launch. They represent significant business value, but the system can still function without them, albeit with workarounds or reduced efficiency.

- **Could-Haves** ▴ These are desirable but non-essential features. They are often described as “nice-to-haves” that would improve user experience or offer minor efficiencies but have a low impact if left out.

- **Won’t-Haves** ▴ This category is equally important, as it explicitly defines what is out of scope for the current project. This manages expectations and prevents scope creep.

</li>

![A polished, dark teal institutional-grade mechanism reveals an internal beige interface, precisely deploying a metallic, arrow-etched component. This signifies high-fidelity execution within an RFQ protocol, enabling atomic settlement and optimized price discovery for institutional digital asset derivatives and multi-leg spreads, ensuring minimal slippage and robust capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/quantitative-finance-driven-rfq-workflow-for-best-execution-in-digital-assets.jpg)

## Advanced Prioritization Frameworks

Moving beyond simple classification, more advanced models introduce layers of quantitative analysis and user-centric evaluation. These frameworks are designed to uncover the deeper value drivers behind each requirement.

![A spherical Liquidity Pool is bisected by a metallic diagonal bar, symbolizing an RFQ Protocol and its Market Microstructure. Imperfections on the bar represent Slippage challenges in High-Fidelity Execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-optimization-within-principals-market-microstructure-framework.jpg)

## The Kano Model

Developed by Noriaki Kano, this model classifies requirements based on their ability to drive customer (or user) satisfaction. It provides a more nuanced understanding of value than a simple linear scale, recognizing that the absence of some features causes dissatisfaction, while the presence of others creates delight.

- 
**Basic (Must-be) Attributes** ▴ These are the equivalent of MoSCoW’s “Must-Haves.” Users expect them, and their absence leads to extreme dissatisfaction. Their presence, however, is taken for granted and does not increase satisfaction. An example is a login system that works reliably.

- 
**Performance (One-dimensional) Attributes** ▴ For these features, satisfaction is directly proportional to their performance. The better they are, the more satisfied users become. Faster report generation or more detailed analytics fall into this category.

- 
**Excitement (Attractive) Attributes** ▴ These are the unexpected “delighters.” Users do not expect them, so their absence causes no dissatisfaction. When present, they create a significant positive response and can become key differentiators. An example might be a proactive alert system that predicts inventory shortages based on sales trends.

> The Kano Model shifts the focus from a purely internal view of needs to an external perspective on what will genuinely satisfy or delight the end-user.

![A sleek, multi-layered institutional crypto derivatives platform interface, featuring a transparent intelligence layer for real-time market microstructure analysis. Buttons signify RFQ protocol initiation for block trades, enabling high-fidelity execution and optimal price discovery within a robust Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-crypto-derivatives-os-precision-execution-rfq-protocol-intelligence-layer.jpg)

## The Weighted Scoring Decision Matrix

This is the most quantitatively rigorous approach, transforming prioritization into a data-driven exercise. It involves defining a set of evaluation criteria, assigning a weight to each criterion based on its strategic importance, and then scoring each requirement against those criteria. This method creates a transparent and defensible priority ranking.

The table below illustrates a comparison of these strategic frameworks, highlighting their primary function and ideal application within the RFP process.

| Framework | Primary Function | Key Advantage | Ideal Application Stage |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| MoSCoW Method | High-level categorization of necessity | Simplicity and clarity; effective for scope management | Initial requirements gathering and stakeholder alignment |
| Kano Model | Classification based on user satisfaction | Focuses on user experience and identifying differentiators | Refining feature lists and shaping the user-centric aspects of the ERP |
| Weighted Scoring | Quantitative ranking based on strategic criteria | Objectivity and data-driven decision making; strong audit trail | Final prioritization before RFP drafting; resolving conflicts between competing requirements |

By combining these methodologies, an organization can create a multi-layered prioritization strategy. It might begin with MoSCoW to establish the non-negotiables, then apply the [Kano model](https://prime.greeks.live/area/kano-model/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) to understand which of the “Should-Have” and “Could-Have” features will deliver the most user satisfaction, and finally use a [weighted scoring](https://prime.greeks.live/area/weighted-scoring/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) matrix to resolve conflicts and produce the definitive, rank-ordered list for the RFP. This systematic process ensures the final document is not merely a list of requests, but a strategic blueprint for the future of the organization’s operational core.

![A sophisticated internal mechanism of a split sphere reveals the core of an institutional-grade RFQ protocol. Polished surfaces reflect intricate components, symbolizing high-fidelity execution and price discovery within digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-system.jpg)

![Sleek metallic panels expose a circuit board, its glowing blue-green traces symbolizing dynamic market microstructure and intelligence layer data flow. A silver stylus embodies a Principal's precise interaction with a Crypto Derivatives OS, enabling high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-microstructure-os.jpg)

## Execution

The execution phase translates strategic prioritization into a tangible, actionable Request for Proposal. This is where abstract values and scores are converted into the precise language of system specifications and operational protocols. A disciplined execution ensures that the intelligence gathered during the strategy phase is faithfully represented in the document that vendors will use to craft their proposals. This process demands meticulous attention to detail and a commitment to maintaining the integrity of the prioritized requirements.

![A dark, robust sphere anchors a precise, glowing teal and metallic mechanism with an upward-pointing spire. This symbolizes institutional digital asset derivatives execution, embodying RFQ protocol precision, liquidity aggregation, and high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-1.jpg)

## The Stakeholder Alignment Protocol

Effective execution begins with a structured process for engaging stakeholders. The goal is to gather comprehensive input while continuously mapping it back to the established strategic criteria, preventing the process from devolving into a simple collection of departmental demands.

- 
**Cross-Functional Workshops** ▴ Convene structured workshops with representatives from every key business unit (e.g. Finance, HR, Supply Chain, Manufacturing, Sales). The objective is not just to list requirements, but to understand the underlying business processes and pain points.

- 
**Guided Requirement Elicitation** ▴ Use the prioritization frameworks as a guide during these sessions. Ask stakeholders to frame their needs in the language of MoSCoW or to consider the user satisfaction impact as per the Kano model. This disciplines the conversation from the outset.

- 
**Centralized Requirement Repository** ▴ All gathered requirements should be logged in a central system. Each entry must be clearly defined, assigned to a business process, and linked to the requesting stakeholder or department. This creates a single source of truth for all potential functionalities.

- 
**Iterative Review and Validation** ▴ The project team must synthesize the inputs and present them back to stakeholders for validation. This iterative loop ensures that requirements are accurately captured and that stakeholders understand how their requests fit within the larger strategic picture.

![A dark, articulated multi-leg spread structure crosses a simpler underlying asset bar on a teal Prime RFQ platform. This visualizes institutional digital asset derivatives execution, leveraging high-fidelity RFQ protocols for optimal capital efficiency and precise price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-prime-os-execution.jpg)

## Quantitative Requirement Modeling

This is the analytical core of the execution phase. The project team applies the [weighted scoring model](https://prime.greeks.live/area/weighted-scoring-model/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) to the validated list of requirements to generate a final, objective ranking. This model provides an empirical basis for all final decisions on what to include in the RFP.

The process involves several steps:

- 
**Finalize Evaluation Criteria** ▴ The leadership team must agree on the definitive criteria for evaluation. These should be directly linked to the organization’s strategic goals. Common criteria include [Strategic Alignment](https://prime.greeks.live/area/strategic-alignment/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), Return on Investment (ROI), Operational Efficiency Gain, Risk Reduction, and User Impact.

- 
**Assign Weights** ▴ The team assigns a percentage weight to each criterion, summing to 100%. This is a critical strategic decision. For a company focused on growth, “Strategic Alignment” might be weighted at 40%, while for a company in a highly regulated industry, “Risk Reduction” might receive the highest weight.

- 
**Score Each Requirement** ▴ The cross-functional team scores each requirement (e.g. on a scale of 1-5 or 1-10) against each criterion. This step should be a collaborative effort to ensure scores are fair and well-understood.

- 
**Calculate Weighted Score** ▴ The final priority score for each requirement is calculated by multiplying its score for each criterion by the criterion’s weight and summing the results.

> A quantitative model removes political bias from the final prioritization, ensuring the RFP is a reflection of enterprise strategy, not departmental influence.

The following table provides a granular, hypothetical example of a Quantitative Requirement Model in action. It demonstrates how disparate requirements can be objectively compared using a common set of strategic drivers.

| Requirement ID | Requirement Description | MoSCoW | Kano | Strategic Alignment (40%) | ROI (25%) | Efficiency Gain (20%) | Risk Reduction (15%) | Final Weighted Score |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| FIN-001 | Automated multi-currency financial consolidation | Must-Have | Basic | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4.60 |
| SCM-003 | Predictive analytics for inventory demand forecasting | Should-Have | Excitement | 5 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 4.50 |
| HR-005 | Mobile app for employee self-service (time off, benefits) | Should-Have | Performance | 3 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 2.65 |
| SAL-002 | Integration with a niche third-party CRM system | Could-Have | Performance | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2.25 |
| FIN-007 | Customizable executive dashboard with real-time KPIs | Should-Have | Performance | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3.25 |
| SEC-001 | Granular, role-based security access down to field level | Must-Have | Basic | 4 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 3.25 |

![Sleek, contrasting segments precisely interlock at a central pivot, symbolizing robust institutional digital asset derivatives RFQ protocols. This nexus enables high-fidelity execution, seamless price discovery, and atomic settlement across diverse liquidity pools, optimizing capital efficiency and mitigating counterparty risk](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-protocol-nexus.jpg)

## The RFP Formulation Process

With the prioritized list finalized, the last step is to draft the RFP document itself. The structure of the RFP should be designed to elicit responses that are easy to compare and evaluate against the established priorities.

- 
**Structure by Priority** ▴ Organize the [functional requirements](https://prime.greeks.live/area/functional-requirements/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) section of the RFP according to the prioritization. Clearly label sections as “Must-Have,” “Should-Have,” and “Could-Have.” This immediately signals your priorities to the vendors.

- 
**Demand Specific Responses** ▴ For each requirement, instruct vendors to respond in a specific format, such as ▴ “Supported – Standard Feature,” “Supported – Requires Configuration,” “Supported – Requires Customization,” or “Not Supported.” This prevents vague, narrative answers.

- 
**Include the ‘Why’** ▴ For high-priority requirements, briefly explain the business driver behind them. This context helps vendors propose more intelligent and effective solutions. For example, for “Predictive inventory forecasting,” add “to reduce stockouts and carrying costs for our just-in-time manufacturing process.”

- 
**Define Evaluation Criteria** ▴ Be transparent. Include a section in the RFP that outlines the criteria you will use to evaluate proposals. While you may not reveal the specific weights, listing the criteria themselves (e.g. functional fit, technical architecture, implementation methodology, total cost of ownership) sets clear expectations.

A meticulously executed prioritization process culminates in an RFP that is a powerful tool for strategic procurement. It enables an organization to control the narrative, forcing vendors to compete on the terms that matter most to the business and ensuring the final selection is the one best architected for long-term success.

![Sleek teal and dark surfaces precisely join, highlighting a circular mechanism. This symbolizes Institutional Trading platforms achieving Precision Execution for Digital Asset Derivatives via RFQ protocols, ensuring Atomic Settlement and Liquidity Aggregation within complex Market Microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-microstructure-interoperability-prime-os-best-execution-layer.jpg)

## References

- Clegg, Dai, and Richard Barker. _Case Method Fast-Track ▴ A RAD Approach_. Addison-Wesley, 1994.

- Kano, Noriaki, et al. “Attractive quality and must-be quality.” _The Journal of the Japanese Society for Quality Control_, vol. 14, no. 2, 1984, pp. 39-48.

- Jacobs, F. Robert, and F. Weston. “Enterprise resource planning (ERP) ▴ A brief history.” _Journal of Operations Management_, vol. 25, no. 2, 2007, pp. 357-363.

- Saaty, Thomas L. _The Analytic Hierarchy Process ▴ Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation_. McGraw-Hill, 1980.

- Wiegers, Karl, and Joy Beatty. _Software Requirements_. 3rd ed. Microsoft Press, 2013.

- Marnewick, Carl, and Walter Labuschagne. “A conceptual model for enterprise resource planning (ERP).” _Information Management & Computer Security_, vol. 13, no. 2, 2005, pp. 144-155.

- Huber, Mark W. et al. “A project-based approach to teaching enterprise resource planning concepts.” _Journal of Information Systems Education_, vol. 13, no. 3, 2002, p. 215.

- Monk, Ellen, and Bret Wagner. _Concepts in Enterprise Resource Planning_. 4th ed. Cengage Learning, 2012.

![Abstract composition featuring transparent liquidity pools and a structured Prime RFQ platform. Crossing elements symbolize algorithmic trading and multi-leg spread execution, visualizing high-fidelity execution within market microstructure for institutional digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-system-precision-engineering-facilitating-high-fidelity-execution-via-rfq-protocols-and-optimal-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## Reflection

![Internal components of a Prime RFQ execution engine, with modular beige units, precise metallic mechanisms, and complex data wiring. This infrastructure supports high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives, facilitating advanced RFQ protocols, optimal liquidity aggregation, multi-leg spread trading, and efficient price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-core-rfq-engine-for-institutional-digital-asset-options.jpg)

## Designing the Future Operational Chassis

The process of prioritizing requirements for an ERP system transcends the immediate goal of procuring software. It is a profound act of organizational self-analysis and architectural design. The resulting RFP is more than a request for a product; it is the schematic for the future operational chassis of the entire enterprise.

The rigor of the prioritization process determines the integrity and performance of that future state. A well-architected requirements list ensures the selected system will be a force multiplier for strategy, a unified data core that provides clarity and agility.

As you move beyond this selection process, consider the system not as a static tool, but as a dynamic platform. The choices made today ▴ the weighting of strategic alignment over immediate cost, the elevation of user-centric design, the insistence on scalable architecture ▴ will define the organization’s capacity to adapt and innovate for years to come. The true measure of success will be found in the system’s ability to answer business questions that have not yet been asked and to support strategic pivots that are not yet on the horizon. The prioritization framework is the initial, and perhaps most critical, act in building that resilient and intelligent future.

![A sophisticated, modular mechanical assembly illustrates an RFQ protocol for institutional digital asset derivatives. Reflective elements and distinct quadrants symbolize dynamic liquidity aggregation and high-fidelity execution for Bitcoin options](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-architecture.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/enterprise-resource-planning/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A dark blue sphere, representing a deep institutional liquidity pool, integrates a central RFQ engine. This system processes aggregated inquiries for Digital Asset Derivatives, including Bitcoin Options and Ethereum Futures, enabling high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-for-optimized-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## Enterprise Resource Planning

Meaning ▴ Enterprise Resource Planning represents a comprehensive, integrated software system designed to manage and consolidate an organization's core business processes and data, encompassing functions such as finance, human resources, manufacturing, supply chain, and services, all within a unified architecture to support institutional operational requirements. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/erp-implementation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Polished metallic pipes intersect via robust fasteners, set against a dark background. This symbolizes intricate Market Microstructure, RFQ Protocols, and Multi-Leg Spread execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-metallic-nodes-illustrating-rfq-protocols-for-multi-leg-digital-asset-derivatives-institutional-execution.jpg)

## Erp Implementation

Meaning ▴ ERP Implementation represents the systematic deployment and configuration of an Enterprise Resource Planning software suite, a comprehensive, integrated platform designed to manage and optimize core business processes across an organization, from financial management and human resources to supply chain operations and client relationship management, thereby establishing a unified data schema and operational framework. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/moscow-method/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precision digital token, subtly green with a '0' marker, meticulously engages a sleek, white institutional-grade platform. This symbolizes secure RFQ protocol initiation for high-fidelity execution of complex multi-leg spread strategies, optimizing portfolio margin and capital efficiency within a Principal's Crypto Derivatives OS](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-platform-secure-rfq-protocol-initiation-for-optimal-block-trade-execution.jpg)

## Moscow Method

Meaning ▴ The MoSCoW Method represents a robust prioritization framework employed to classify requirements into distinct categories ▴ Must Have, Should Have, Could Have, and Won't Have. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/weighted-scoring/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract intersecting blades in varied textures depict institutional digital asset derivatives. These forms symbolize sophisticated RFQ protocol streams enabling multi-leg spread execution across aggregated liquidity](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-driven-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution.jpg)

## Weighted Scoring

Meaning ▴ Weighted Scoring defines a computational methodology where multiple input variables are assigned distinct coefficients or weights, reflecting their relative importance, before being aggregated into a single, composite metric. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/kano-model/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A stylized rendering illustrates a robust RFQ protocol within an institutional market microstructure, depicting high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives. A transparent mechanism channels a precise order, symbolizing efficient price discovery and atomic settlement for block trades via a prime brokerage system](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-execution-digital-asset-derivatives-options-high-fidelity-trading.jpg)

## Kano Model

Meaning ▴ The Kano Model functions as a robust framework for classifying system attributes or service features based on their potential to influence user satisfaction, categorizing them into three primary types ▴ basic, performance, and excitement. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/weighted-scoring-model/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sophisticated digital asset derivatives RFQ engine's core components are depicted, showcasing precise market microstructure for optimal price discovery. Its central hub facilitates algorithmic trading, ensuring high-fidelity execution across multi-leg spreads](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimizing-multi-leg-spreads-for-optimal-capital-efficiency.jpg)

## Weighted Scoring Model

Meaning ▴ A Weighted Scoring Model constitutes a systematic computational framework designed to evaluate and prioritize diverse entities by assigning distinct numerical weights to a set of predefined criteria, thereby generating a composite score that reflects their aggregated importance or suitability. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/strategic-alignment/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A light sphere, representing a Principal's digital asset, is integrated into an angular blue RFQ protocol framework. Sharp fins symbolize high-fidelity execution and price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principals-core-asset-rfq-protocol-framework-for-digital-derivatives.jpg)

## Strategic Alignment

Meaning ▴ Strategic Alignment denotes the precise congruence between an institutional principal's overarching objectives and the operational configuration of their digital asset derivatives trading infrastructure. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/functional-requirements/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sharp, translucent, green-tipped stylus extends from a metallic system, symbolizing high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives. It represents a private quotation mechanism within an institutional grade Prime RFQ, enabling optimal price discovery for block trades via RFQ protocols, ensuring capital efficiency and minimizing slippage](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-interface.jpg)

## Functional Requirements

Meaning ▴ Functional Requirements are precise, verifiable statements that define the specific behaviors, capabilities, and data transformations a system must exhibit to satisfy a user's needs or achieve a particular operational objective within the institutional digital asset derivatives landscape. </a>

**Tags:** [ERP RFP](https://options.greeks.live/area/erp-rfp/), [Enterprise Resource Planning](https://options.greeks.live/area/enterprise-resource-planning/), [Strategic Alignment](https://options.greeks.live/area/strategic-alignment/), [Business Process Analysis](https://options.greeks.live/area/business-process-analysis/), [Functional Requirements](https://options.greeks.live/area/functional-requirements/), [Stakeholder Management](https://options.greeks.live/area/stakeholder-management/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [What Are the Most Common Pitfalls to Avoid When Designing Rfp Evaluation Criteria?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-pitfalls-to-avoid-when-designing-rfp-evaluation-criteria/)
![Sleek metallic panels expose a circuit board, its glowing blue-green traces symbolizing dynamic market microstructure and intelligence layer data flow. A silver stylus embodies a Principal's precise interaction with a Crypto Derivatives OS, enabling high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols for institutional digital asset derivatives.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-microstructure-os.jpg)

Designing RFP evaluation criteria is a strategic modeling exercise to predict long-term partner value, not just a procurement checklist.

- 
### [What Are the Differences between Simple Scoring and Weighted Scoring in an Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-differences-between-simple-scoring-and-weighted-scoring-in-an-rfp/)
![A polished, teal-hued digital asset derivative disc rests upon a robust, textured market infrastructure base, symbolizing high-fidelity execution and liquidity aggregation. Its reflective surface illustrates real-time price discovery and multi-leg options strategies, central to institutional RFQ protocols and principal trading frameworks.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-institutional-execution.jpg)

A simple RFP score verifies compliance; a weighted score aligns procurement with strategic value and operational priorities.

- 
### [What Are the Key Differences in the Evaluation Criteria between a Request for Proposal and a Request for Quote?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-in-the-evaluation-criteria-between-a-request-for-proposal-and-a-request-for-quote/)
![Parallel marked channels depict granular market microstructure across diverse institutional liquidity pools. A glowing cyan ring highlights an active Request for Quote RFQ for precise price discovery. A metallic probe signifies an algorithmic trading engine performing high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-high-fidelity-execution-3.jpg)

An RFQ's evaluation is a quantitative validation of price, while an RFP's is a qualitative assessment of value and strategic fit.

- 
### [How Can a Quantitative Scoring Model Improve the Objectivity of RFP Decisions?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-a-quantitative-scoring-model-improve-the-objectivity-of-rfp-decisions/)
![A translucent blue sphere is precisely centered within beige, dark, and teal channels. This depicts RFQ protocol for digital asset derivatives, enabling high-fidelity execution of a block trade within a controlled market microstructure, ensuring atomic settlement and price discovery on a Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-execution-pathway-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-leveraging-rfq-protocols-and-high-fidelity-market-microstructure.jpg)

A quantitative scoring model improves RFP objectivity by translating subjective criteria into a structured, data-driven evaluation framework.

- 
### [What Is the Relationship between the Rfp Process and the Long-Term Roi of an Erp Implementation?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-relationship-between-the-rfp-process-and-the-long-term-roi-of-an-erp-implementation/)
![A transparent glass sphere rests precisely on a metallic rod, connecting a grey structural element and a dark teal engineered module with a clear lens. This symbolizes atomic settlement of digital asset derivatives via private quotation within a Prime RFQ, showcasing high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency for RFQ protocols and liquidity aggregation.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/architecting-high-fidelity-execution-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-and-systemic-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

The RFP process is the architectural blueprint that dictates the structural integrity and long-term value generation of an ERP system.

- 
### [What Are the Most Common Failure Points in Enterprise Data Platform Projects?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-failure-points-in-enterprise-data-platform-projects/)
![Abstract visualization of institutional RFQ protocol for digital asset derivatives. Translucent layers symbolize dark liquidity pools within complex market microstructure. A central channel ensures high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement. Green nodes denote private quotation endpoints, enabling aggregated inquiry and price discovery.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine-6.jpg)

Enterprise data platform failures are systemic breakdowns rooted in strategic misalignment, not isolated technical faults.

- 
### [How Can an Organization Effectively Implement Blind Scoring for RFP Responses?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-effectively-implement-blind-scoring-for-rfp-responses/)
![An intricate mechanical assembly reveals the market microstructure of an institutional-grade RFQ protocol engine. It visualizes high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives block trades, managing counterparty risk and multi-leg spread strategies within a liquidity pool, embodying a Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-architecture.jpg)

Effective blind RFP scoring is achieved by architecting a system that anonymizes vendor identities, enabling evaluation based solely on the quantitative merit of the proposal.

- 
### [How Do You Evaluate RFP Responses Objectively?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-evaluate-rfp-responses-objectively/)
![A metallic cylindrical component, suggesting robust Prime RFQ infrastructure, interacts with a luminous teal-blue disc representing a dynamic liquidity pool for digital asset derivatives. A precise golden bar diagonally traverses, symbolizing an RFQ-driven block trade path, enabling high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement within complex market microstructure for institutional grade operations.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-execution-protocols-navigating-digital-asset-derivatives-market-microstructure-for-optimal-block-trade-liquidity.jpg)

Objective RFP evaluation is a disciplined system for translating strategic needs into a quantifiable, defensible vendor selection.

- 
### [How Do You Build Consensus among a Diverse Rfp Evaluation Committee?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-build-consensus-among-a-diverse-rfp-evaluation-committee/)
![Abstract geometric forms in blue and beige represent institutional liquidity pools and market segments. A metallic rod signifies RFQ protocol connectivity for atomic settlement of digital asset derivatives. This visualizes high-fidelity execution and price discovery across diverse trading venues, emphasizing capital efficiency and minimizing slippage.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-market-microstructure-1.jpg)

A structured framework of governance and facilitated discussion transforms diverse expert opinions into a unified, defensible procurement decision.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "How Can an Organization Effectively Prioritize Its Requirements in an ERP RFP?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-effectively-prioritize-its-requirements-in-an-erp-rfp/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-effectively-prioritize-its-requirements-in-an-erp-rfp/"
    },
    "headline": "How Can an Organization Effectively Prioritize Its Requirements in an ERP RFP? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "Prioritizing ERP RFP requirements is a systematic engineering of business needs into a weighted, strategic blueprint for vendor selection. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-effectively-prioritize-its-requirements-in-an-erp-rfp/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-07T13:57:12+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-08-07T13:57:14+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-market-microstructure-architecture.jpg",
        "caption": "An abstract composition of intersecting geometric planes, featuring transparent, dark, and beige elements, represents the complex architecture of institutional digital asset derivatives trading. It illustrates the precise interplay within RFQ protocols for block trade execution, highlighting price discovery mechanisms and strategic dark liquidity management. Visual metaphors convey systematic high-fidelity execution, managing counterparty risk, and optimizing portfolio margin across diverse crypto derivatives OS for alpha generation."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Business Process Analysis",
        "Enterprise Resource Planning",
        "ERP Implementation",
        "ERP RFP",
        "Functional Requirements",
        "Kano Model",
        "MoSCoW Method",
        "Requirements Prioritization",
        "Scope Management",
        "Stakeholder Management",
        "Strategic Alignment",
        "Technical Requirements",
        "Vendor Selection",
        "Weighted Scoring",
        "Weighted Scoring Model"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-effectively-prioritize-its-requirements-in-an-erp-rfp/
