# How Can an Organization Effectively Weight Non-Financial Factors in an RFP? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-09
**Categories:** Question

---

![An abstract composition of interlocking, precisely engineered metallic plates represents a sophisticated institutional trading infrastructure. Visible perforations within a central block symbolize optimized data conduits for high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-multi-leg-execution-layer.jpg)

![Central, interlocked mechanical structures symbolize a sophisticated Crypto Derivatives OS driving institutional RFQ protocol. Surrounding blades represent diverse liquidity pools and multi-leg spread components](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-architecture-optimizing-high-fidelity-execution-across-diverse-liquidity-pools.jpg)

## Concept

![A multi-layered, sectioned sphere reveals core institutional digital asset derivatives architecture. Translucent layers depict dynamic RFQ liquidity pools and multi-leg spread execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-market-microstructure-1.jpg)

## Beyond the Price Tag

The request for proposal (RFP) process, in its most evolved form, functions as a system for acquiring a strategic partner, not merely a vendor. The conventional over-indexing on price as the primary selection criterion is a systemic flaw that mistakes cost for value. A procurement model calibrated solely on the lowest bid operates on a fragile and incomplete data set. It systematically ignores the complex, non-financial variables that ultimately determine the resilience, efficiency, and long-term performance of the procured relationship.

Shifting the weighting mechanism to incorporate these qualitative dimensions is an act of architectural fortification. It transforms the RFP from a simple cost-reduction tool into a sophisticated risk management and value-creation system. This recalibration acknowledges that factors like supplier reliability, technological integration, reputational alignment, and operational flexibility are not soft metrics; they are hard-coded inputs that directly influence [total cost of ownership](https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost-of-ownership/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) and organizational outcomes.

An organization’s capacity to effectively weight [non-financial factors](https://prime.greeks.live/question/beyond-cost-what-are-the-most-critical-non-financial-factors-to-consider-in-a-technology-procurement-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is a direct reflection of its operational maturity. It signals a move from tactical purchasing to strategic sourcing. This transition requires a fundamental re-engineering of the evaluation framework. Instead of a linear, price-first evaluation, the system must adopt a [multi-criteria decision analysis](https://prime.greeks.live/area/multi-criteria-decision-analysis/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (MCDA) structure.

Within this structure, non-financial attributes are identified, quantified through a rigorous [scoring rubric](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-best-practices-for-training-an-rfp-evaluation-committee-on-a-scoring-rubric/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), and assigned weights that reflect their strategic importance to the organization’s objectives. The resulting model provides a holistic, data-driven view of each proposal, revealing the true value proposition beyond the surface-level financial quote. It is a system designed to select a partner that enhances the organization’s capabilities, rather than one that simply fulfills a line-item requirement at the lowest possible price point.

> A procurement model calibrated solely on the lowest bid operates on a fragile and incomplete data set, systematically ignoring the variables that determine long-term performance.

![An abstract geometric composition visualizes a sophisticated market microstructure for institutional digital asset derivatives. A central liquidity aggregation hub facilitates RFQ protocols and high-fidelity execution of multi-leg spreads](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/optimized-rfq-execution-framework-for-digital-asset-derivatives-trading.jpg)

## The Systemic Impact of Qualitative Metrics

Integrating non-financial factors into an [RFP evaluation](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is a deliberate act of system design aimed at mitigating future risk and unlocking latent value. Each non-financial criterion serves as a sensor, providing critical data on a potential partner’s stability and capabilities. A supplier with a robust quality management system, for instance, reduces the probability of costly product failures and rework down the line. A partner demonstrating high levels of security and data-privacy compliance insulates the organization from catastrophic breaches and reputational damage.

These are quantifiable impacts, even if they do not appear on the initial invoice. The challenge lies in translating these qualitative attributes into a quantitative scoring framework that allows for direct, objective comparison between competing proposals.

This translation process begins with a clear articulation of the organization’s strategic priorities. What are the critical success factors for the project or partnership? Is it speed to market, innovation, reliability, or long-term support? Once these priorities are defined, they become the primary categories for the non-financial evaluation.

Each category is then broken down into specific, measurable criteria. For example, a “Reliability” category might include sub-criteria such as ‘documented uptime,’ ‘mean time between failures (MTBF),’ and ‘client references for service consistency.’ By deconstructing broad concepts into granular data points, the organization can build a scoring model that is both comprehensive and defensible. This methodical approach removes subjectivity from the evaluation process, ensuring that the final decision is based on a systematic analysis of all relevant factors, creating a partnership architecture built for resilience and sustained performance.

![Three metallic, circular mechanisms represent a calibrated system for institutional-grade digital asset derivatives trading. The central dial signifies price discovery and algorithmic precision within RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-and-execution-precision.jpg)

![A luminous digital market microstructure diagram depicts intersecting high-fidelity execution paths over a transparent liquidity pool. A central RFQ engine processes aggregated inquiries for institutional digital asset derivatives, optimizing price discovery and capital efficiency within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution-principal-operational-framework-price-discovery.jpg)

## Strategy

![A dark blue, precision-engineered blade-like instrument, representing a digital asset derivative or multi-leg spread, rests on a light foundational block, symbolizing a private quotation or block trade. This structure intersects robust teal market infrastructure rails, indicating RFQ protocol execution within a Prime RFQ for high-fidelity execution and liquidity aggregation in institutional trading](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-framework-multi-leg-spreads-best-execution-capital-efficiency.jpg)

## Designing the Evaluation Apparatus

The strategic weighting of non-financial factors requires the construction of a bespoke evaluation apparatus. This is not a one-size-fits-all template but a system engineered to reflect the unique risk appetite and strategic objectives of the organization. The foundational step is the formal identification and categorization of relevant [non-financial criteria](https://prime.greeks.live/area/non-financial-criteria/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). Stakeholders from across the organization ▴ from IT and operations to legal and finance ▴ must be convened to define what constitutes value and risk for the specific procurement.

This collaborative process ensures that the resulting framework is holistic and aligned with enterprise-wide goals. The output is a clear hierarchy of criteria, moving from broad categories to specific, measurable indicators.

Once the criteria are established, the next strategic decision is the selection of a weighting methodology. This is where the organization encodes its priorities into the evaluation model. A common and effective approach is the [balanced scorecard](https://prime.greeks.live/area/balanced-scorecard/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), which groups criteria into distinct perspectives such as ‘Technical Capability,’ ‘Operational Stability,’ ‘Security and Compliance,’ and ‘Strategic Alignment.’ Each category is assigned a total weight that reflects its importance. For a critical IT system, ‘Security and Compliance’ might carry a 35% weight, whereas for a creative services contract, ‘Innovation and Creativity’ might be the dominant factor.

This allocation of weights is the primary mechanism for controlling the outcome of the RFP, steering the decision toward the proposal that offers the best holistic value, not just the [lowest price](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-between-a-best-value-and-a-lowest-price-technically-acceptable-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). Best practices suggest that price should typically be weighted between 20-30% to prevent it from disproportionately influencing the outcome.

> The allocation of weights is the primary mechanism for controlling the outcome of the RFP, steering the decision toward the proposal that offers the best holistic value.

![Abstract spheres and a sharp disc depict an Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives ecosystem. A central Principal's Operational Framework interacts with a Liquidity Pool via RFQ Protocol for High-Fidelity Execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-framework.jpg)

## Frameworks for Multi-Criteria Analysis

To move from a list of weighted criteria to a final decision, organizations must implement a formal multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) framework. These frameworks provide the mathematical structure for scoring and ranking proposals in a consistent and transparent manner. Two prominent methodologies are the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) and the [Analytic Hierarchy Process](https://prime.greeks.live/area/analytic-hierarchy-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (AHP).

- 
**Simple Additive Weighting (SAW)** ▴ This is the most straightforward MCDA method. Each evaluator scores a vendor’s response to a specific criterion on a predefined scale (e.g. 1 to 5). This raw score is then multiplied by the criterion’s weight to produce a weighted score. The total score for a proposal is the sum of all [weighted scores](https://prime.greeks.live/question/why-do-dependency-based-anomaly-scores-provide-a-stronger-signal-for-financial-fraud-than-proximity-based-scores/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). Its strength lies in its simplicity and ease of implementation.

- 
**[Analytic Hierarchy](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-analytic-hierarchy-process-improve-objectivity-in-kpi-weighting/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) Process (AHP)** ▴ AHP provides a more sophisticated and rigorous framework. It addresses the challenge of assigning weights by using pairwise comparisons. Stakeholders compare each criterion against every other criterion, rating their relative importance. This process reduces cognitive bias and produces mathematically consistent weights. AHP then uses these weights to evaluate the alternatives, also through pairwise comparisons, resulting in a robust ranking that reflects the complex trade-offs inherent in the decision.

The choice of framework depends on the complexity and strategic importance of the procurement. For high-value, high-risk decisions, the rigor of AHP provides a more defensible and nuanced analysis. For more routine procurements, the efficiency of SAW may be sufficient. The key is to select a method and apply it with discipline.

![The central teal core signifies a Principal's Prime RFQ, routing RFQ protocols across modular arms. Metallic levers denote precise control over multi-leg spread execution and block trades](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principals-prime-os-rfq-system-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

## Comparative Analysis of Weighting Models

Different weighting models can lead to different outcomes, even with the same underlying proposal data. Understanding the characteristics of each model is essential for selecting the appropriate one. The table below compares two common approaches ▴ a fixed weighting model and a two-stage evaluation process.

| Model Feature | Fixed Weighting Model (e.g. SAW) | Two-Stage Evaluation Model |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Process Flow | All criteria, including price, are scored and weighted simultaneously to produce a single overall score for each vendor. | Non-financial criteria are evaluated and scored first. Only vendors who meet a minimum quality threshold proceed to the second stage, where price is considered. |
| Bias Mitigation | Relies on pre-defined weights to balance the influence of price. Susceptible to “low-bid bias” if price is weighted too heavily. | Structurally separates the quality decision from the price decision, reducing the cognitive bias of being influenced by a low price while evaluating technical merit. |
| Ideal Application | Procurements where price and quality are considered intertwined and a trade-off analysis is desired from the start. | High-risk or complex procurements where ensuring a minimum standard of quality and capability is the paramount concern. |
| Complexity | Lower complexity in process management, as it is a single-phase evaluation. | Higher complexity, requiring clear rules for the qualification threshold and management of a two-step process. |

![A sophisticated proprietary system module featuring precision-engineered components, symbolizing an institutional-grade Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives. Its intricate design represents market microstructure analysis, RFQ protocol integration, and high-fidelity execution capabilities, optimizing liquidity aggregation and price discovery for block trades within a multi-leg spread environment](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-proprietary-architecture-driving-high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-via-rfq-protocols-and-optimized-market-microstructure-dynamics.jpg)

![Geometric shapes symbolize an institutional digital asset derivatives trading ecosystem. A pyramid denotes foundational quantitative analysis and the Principal's operational framework](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system-microstructure.jpg)

## Execution

![A central engineered mechanism, resembling a Prime RFQ hub, anchors four precision arms. This symbolizes multi-leg spread execution and liquidity pool aggregation for RFQ protocols, enabling high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-framework-enabling-multi-leg-spread-strategies-for-optimized-liquidity.jpg)

## The Operational Playbook for Weighted Scoring

Executing a [weighted scoring](https://prime.greeks.live/area/weighted-scoring/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) model for non-financial factors is a systematic process that transforms strategic intent into a tactical, decision-making tool. It requires discipline, precision, and a clear operational workflow. The process ensures that every proposal is evaluated against the same objective, data-driven standard, leading to a defensible and optimized selection. This playbook outlines the critical steps for implementation, from defining the scoring rubric to calculating the final, consolidated score.

- 
**Establish the Evaluation Committee** ▴ Assemble a cross-functional team of stakeholders. This group should possess the collective expertise to evaluate all facets of the proposals, from technical specifications to financial stability. A diverse team minimizes individual bias and ensures a comprehensive assessment.

- 
**Finalize Criteria and Weights** ▴ Based on the strategic framework, the committee must ratify the final list of non-financial criteria and their corresponding weights. This step should be completed and documented before the RFP is released to ensure fairness and transparency. The weights must sum to 100% (or 1.0) for the entire evaluation, including the price component.

- 
**Develop the Scoring Rubric** ▴ This is the most critical tool for execution. For each non-financial criterion, a detailed scoring rubric must be created. This rubric translates qualitative attributes into quantitative scores. A typical scale is 1-to-5 or 1-to-10. The rubric must clearly define what constitutes each score level. For example, for the criterion ‘Customer Support,’ a score of 5 might require ’24/7 live support with a dedicated account manager and a guaranteed response time of less than 1 hour,’ while a score of 1 might be ‘Email support only with a 48-hour response time.’ This level of detail is non-negotiable for ensuring consistency among evaluators.

- 
**Conduct Individual Evaluations** ▴ Each member of the evaluation committee should independently score all proposals against the rubric. This “blind” initial scoring prevents groupthink and ensures that each evaluator’s unique perspective is captured. Specialized software can facilitate this process, ensuring scorers only evaluate sections relevant to their expertise.

- 
**Hold a Calibration Session** ▴ After individual scoring is complete, the committee convenes for a calibration or consensus meeting. The purpose is to discuss and reconcile significant variances in scores. An evaluator may have misinterpreted a vendor’s response or have unique insight that others missed. This moderated discussion ensures that the final scores for each criterion are a true reflection of the committee’s collective judgment.

- 
**Calculate Weighted Scores** ▴ With the final, calibrated scores in place, the weighted scores can be calculated. For each criterion, the calibrated score is multiplied by the criterion’s weight. The sum of these weighted scores produces the total non-financial score for each vendor.

- 
**Incorporate Price and Finalize Ranking** ▴ The price component is then incorporated. The method for scoring price must also be pre-defined. A common approach is to award the lowest-priced bid the maximum price score and to score other bids proportionally. The total non-financial score is added to the price score to determine the final overall score and ranking for each vendor. The vendor with the highest total score represents the best overall value to the organization.

![A stacked, multi-colored modular system representing an institutional digital asset derivatives platform. The top unit facilitates RFQ protocol initiation and dynamic price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine-15.jpg)

## Quantitative Modeling and Data Analysis

To illustrate the execution of a weighted scoring model, consider a hypothetical scenario where an organization is selecting a cloud-based software-as-a-service (SaaS) provider. The evaluation committee has established the criteria and weights shown in the table below. The scoring rubric uses a 1-to-5 scale.

| Evaluation Category | Specific Criterion | Weight (%) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Technical Capability (40%) | Core Feature Alignment | 20% |
| Security & Compliance (25%) | Data Encryption & Privacy | 15% |
| Vendor Stability & Support (15%) | Financial Viability | 5% |
| Price (20%) | Total Cost of Ownership (3-year) | 20% |

After the evaluation and calibration process, the committee has assigned the following calibrated scores to three competing vendors. The formula to calculate the weighted score for each criterion is ▴ Weighted Score = Calibrated Score × Weight. The total score is the sum of all weighted scores.

For example, Vendor A’s weighted score for ‘Core Feature Alignment’ is 4 × 0.20 = 0.80.

The price score is calculated by giving the lowest price (Vendor B at $200,000) the maximum score of 5. Other vendors are scored inversely proportional to the lowest price ▴ Price Score = (Lowest Price / Vendor’s Price) × 5. For Vendor A, this is ($200,000 / $220,000) × 5 ≈ 4.55.

> A detailed scoring rubric is the critical instrument that translates subjective qualities into objective, comparable data points, ensuring evaluation consistency.

The final analysis reveals that despite Vendor B having the lowest price, Vendor A achieves the highest total score. This outcome is a direct result of the weighting system, which prioritizes technical capability and security over pure cost. The model has successfully identified the proposal that offers the best systemic value, preventing the organization from selecting a cheaper but technically inferior solution. This data-driven conclusion provides a clear, defensible rationale for the selection of Vendor A as the strategic partner.

![Stacked, modular components represent a sophisticated Prime RFQ for institutional digital asset derivatives. Each layer signifies distinct liquidity pools or execution venues, with transparent covers revealing intricate market microstructure and algorithmic trading logic, facilitating high-fidelity execution and price discovery within a private quotation environment](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-framework.jpg)

## References

- Saaty, Thomas L. _The Analytic Hierarchy Process ▴ Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation_. McGraw-Hill, 1980.

- Weber, Charles A. et al. “Vendor selection criteria and methods.” _European journal of operational research_ 50.1 (1991) ▴ 2-18.

- Ho, William, et al. “Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection ▴ A literature review.” _European Journal of Operational Research_ 202.1 (2010) ▴ 16-24.

- De Boer, Luitzen, et al. “A review of methods supporting supplier selection.” _European journal of purchasing & supply management_ 7.2 (2001) ▴ 75-89.

- Chai, Junyi, James NK Liu, and Eric WT Ngai. “Application of decision-making techniques in supplier selection ▴ A systematic review of literature.” _Expert systems with applications_ 40.10 (2013) ▴ 3872-3885.

- Kull, Thomas J. and Steven A. Melnyk. “The analytic hierarchy process in supply management.” _Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management_ 14.1 (2008) ▴ 43-54.

- Ghodsypour, S. H. and C. O’brien. “A decision support system for supplier selection using a combined analytic hierarchy process and linear programming.” _International journal of production economics_ 56 (1998) ▴ 199-212.

- Tahriri, F. et al. “AHP approach for supplier evaluation and selection in a steel manufacturing company.” _Journal of Industrial Engineering_ 2.2 (2008) ▴ 54-68.

![A central RFQ aggregation engine radiates segments, symbolizing distinct liquidity pools and market makers. This depicts multi-dealer RFQ protocol orchestration for high-fidelity price discovery in digital asset derivatives, highlighting diverse counterparty risk profiles and algorithmic pricing grids](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/centralized-digital-asset-rfq-orchestration-for-multi-venue-liquidity-aggregation-and-high-fidelity-execution-across-diverse-counterparties.jpg)

## Reflection

![A polished, dark teal institutional-grade mechanism reveals an internal beige interface, precisely deploying a metallic, arrow-etched component. This signifies high-fidelity execution within an RFQ protocol, enabling atomic settlement and optimized price discovery for institutional digital asset derivatives and multi-leg spreads, ensuring minimal slippage and robust capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/quantitative-finance-driven-rfq-workflow-for-best-execution-in-digital-assets.jpg)

## Calibrating the Value Aperture

The successful integration of non-financial factors into a procurement system is more than a procedural upgrade; it is a recalibration of the organization’s value aperture. It reflects a deeper understanding that partnerships are complex systems, and that initial price is merely one input among a vast array of variables that will dictate the ultimate success and resilience of that system. The frameworks and models discussed provide the mechanical gears for this process, but the true impetus must come from a strategic recognition that long-term capability outweighs short-term cost savings.

An RFP process, when architected with this principle at its core, ceases to be a tool for simple transactions. It becomes an engine for building a robust and adaptive ecosystem of partners.

Ultimately, the rigor of the evaluation process is a proxy for the quality of the relationship the organization seeks to build. A system that meticulously quantifies reliability, security, and strategic alignment is one that is inherently designed to foster these same qualities in its partnerships. As you consider your own organization’s procurement framework, the pivotal question is not whether you can afford to implement such a system, but whether you can afford the systemic risks of operating without one. The final decision rests on how your organization defines value and how precisely it can measure its chosen definition.

![Abstract geometric structure with sharp angles and translucent planes, symbolizing institutional digital asset derivatives market microstructure. The central point signifies a core RFQ protocol engine, enabling precise price discovery and liquidity aggregation for multi-leg options strategies, crucial for high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principals-operational-framework-optimizing-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-for-alpha-generation.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost-of-ownership/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Precision metallic bars intersect above a dark circuit board, symbolizing RFQ protocols driving high-fidelity execution within market microstructure. This represents atomic settlement for institutional digital asset derivatives, enabling price discovery and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-precision-systemic-framework.jpg)

## Total Cost of Ownership

Meaning ▴ Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) is a comprehensive financial metric that quantifies the direct and indirect costs associated with acquiring, operating, and maintaining a product or system throughout its entire lifecycle. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/multi-criteria-decision-analysis/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precision-engineered component, like an RFQ protocol engine, displays a reflective blade and numerical data. It symbolizes high-fidelity execution within market microstructure, driving price discovery, capital efficiency, and algorithmic trading for institutional Digital Asset Derivatives on a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-execution-engine-core-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-price-discovery.jpg)

## Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis

Meaning ▴ Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) refers to a systematic and rigorous framework comprising various methodologies specifically designed to evaluate and compare alternative options based on multiple, often inherently conflicting, criteria to facilitate complex decision-making processes. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/beyond-cost-what-are-the-most-critical-non-financial-factors-to-consider-in-a-technology-procurement-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precision-engineered metallic and glass system depicts the core of an Institutional Grade Prime RFQ, facilitating high-fidelity execution for Digital Asset Derivatives. Transparent layers represent visible liquidity pools and the intricate market microstructure supporting RFQ protocol processing, ensuring atomic settlement capabilities](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/robust-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-platform-for-optimized-rfq-protocol-execution-and-deep-liquidity-access.jpg)

## Non-Financial Factors

A technology RFP's true goal is architecting systemic resilience by quantifying non-financial risk factors. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-best-practices-for-training-an-rfp-evaluation-committee-on-a-scoring-rubric/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A central toroidal structure and intricate core are bisected by two blades: one algorithmic with circuits, the other solid. This symbolizes an institutional digital asset derivatives platform, leveraging RFQ protocols for high-fidelity execution and price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-hub-integrating-algorithmic-intelligence-for-high-fidelity-price-discovery-and-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## Scoring Rubric

Calibrating an RFP evaluation committee via rubric training is the essential mechanism for ensuring objective, defensible, and strategically aligned procurement decisions. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Stacked concentric layers, bisected by a precise diagonal line. This abstract depicts the intricate market microstructure of institutional digital asset derivatives, embodying a Principal's operational framework](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/multi-layered-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-architecture.jpg)

## Rfp Evaluation

Meaning ▴ RFP Evaluation is the systematic and objective process of assessing and comparing the proposals submitted by various vendors in response to a Request for Proposal, with the ultimate goal of identifying the most suitable solution or service provider. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/non-financial-criteria/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sophisticated, angular digital asset derivatives execution engine with glowing circuit traces and an integrated chip rests on a textured platform. This symbolizes advanced RFQ protocols, high-fidelity execution, and the robust Principal's operational framework supporting institutional-grade market microstructure and optimized liquidity aggregation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/advanced-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-architecture.jpg)

## Non-Financial Criteria

Meaning ▴ Non-Financial Criteria encompass qualitative and quantitative factors, distinct from direct price or cost, used to assess proposals, vendors, or investment opportunities within a procurement process. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/balanced-scorecard/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Stacked, multi-colored discs symbolize an institutional RFQ Protocol's layered architecture for Digital Asset Derivatives. This embodies a Prime RFQ enabling high-fidelity execution across diverse liquidity pools, optimizing multi-leg spread trading and capital efficiency within complex market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-stack-for-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Balanced Scorecard

Meaning ▴ The Balanced Scorecard, within the systems architecture context of crypto investing, represents a strategic performance management framework designed to translate an organization's vision and strategy into a comprehensive set of performance measures. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-between-a-best-value-and-a-lowest-price-technically-acceptable-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A multi-layered, circular device with a central concentric lens. It symbolizes an RFQ engine for precision price discovery and high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-for-precision-execution.jpg)

## Lowest Price

Best-Value RFPs use a trade-off analysis to weigh cost against performance, while LPTA RFPs award to the lowest bidder meeting minimums. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/analytic-hierarchy-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Precision-engineered metallic tracks house a textured block with a central threaded aperture. This visualizes a core RFQ execution component within an institutional market microstructure, enabling private quotation for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-framework-precision-microstructure-component.jpg)

## Analytic Hierarchy Process

Meaning ▴ The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a structured decision-making framework designed to organize and analyze complex problems involving multiple, often qualitative, criteria and subjective judgments, particularly valuable in strategic crypto investing and technology evaluation. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/why-do-dependency-based-anomaly-scores-provide-a-stronger-signal-for-financial-fraud-than-proximity-based-scores/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sophisticated digital asset derivatives trading mechanism features a central processing hub with luminous blue accents, symbolizing an intelligence layer driving high fidelity execution. Transparent circular elements represent dynamic liquidity pools and a complex volatility surface, revealing market microstructure and atomic settlement via an advanced RFQ protocol](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution-framework-optimizing-market-microstructure-price-discovery-intelligence-layer.jpg)

## Weighted Scores

Dependency-based scores provide a stronger signal by modeling the logical relationships between entities, detecting systemic fraud that proximity models miss. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-analytic-hierarchy-process-improve-objectivity-in-kpi-weighting/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract dark reflective planes and white structural forms are illuminated by glowing blue conduits and circular elements. This visualizes an institutional digital asset derivatives RFQ protocol, enabling atomic settlement, optimal price discovery, and capital efficiency via advanced market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-optimized-for-high-fidelity-execution-1.jpg)

## Analytic Hierarchy

The Analytic Hierarchy Process improves objectivity by structuring decisions and using pairwise comparisons to create transparent, consistent KPI weights. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/weighted-scoring/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Translucent teal glass pyramid and flat pane, geometrically aligned on a dark base, symbolize market microstructure and price discovery within RFQ protocols for institutional digital asset derivatives. This visualizes multi-leg spread construction, high-fidelity execution via a Principal's operational framework, ensuring atomic settlement for latent liquidity](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/transparent-geometric-structures-visualizing-multi-leg-spread-rfq-protocols-for-high-fidelity-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

## Weighted Scoring

Meaning ▴ Weighted Scoring, in the context of crypto investing and systems architecture, is a quantitative methodology used for evaluating and prioritizing various options, vendors, or investment opportunities by assigning differential importance (weights) to distinct criteria. </a>

**Tags:** [Vendor Risk Management](https://options.greeks.live/area/vendor-risk-management/), [RFP Evaluation](https://options.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation/), [Total Cost of Ownership](https://options.greeks.live/area/total-cost-of-ownership/), [Non-Financial Criteria](https://options.greeks.live/area/non-financial-criteria/), [Supplier Selection](https://options.greeks.live/area/supplier-selection/), [Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis](https://options.greeks.live/area/multi-criteria-decision-analysis/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [What Is the Optimal Weight to Assign to Price in an Rfp Evaluation to Avoid Compromising Quality?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-optimal-weight-to-assign-to-price-in-an-rfp-evaluation-to-avoid-compromising-quality/)
![Intersecting translucent aqua blades, etched with algorithmic logic, symbolize multi-leg spread strategies and high-fidelity execution. Positioned over a reflective disk representing a deep liquidity pool, this illustrates advanced RFQ protocols driving precise price discovery within institutional digital asset derivatives market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-optimized-algorithmic-execution-microstructure-for-price-discovery.jpg)

The optimal RFP price weight is a strategic calibration, typically 20-30%, that prioritizes long-term value over initial cost.

- 
### [How Can an Organization Objectively Score Qualitative Criteria like Vendor Vision or Cultural Fit in an Rfp Evaluation?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-objectively-score-qualitative-criteria-like-vendor-vision-or-cultural-fit-in-an-rfp-evaluation/)
![Mirrored abstract components with glowing indicators, linked by an articulated mechanism, depict an institutional grade Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives. This visualizes RFQ protocol driven high-fidelity execution, price discovery, and atomic settlement across market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-rfq-high-fidelity-execution-microstructure.jpg)

Objectively scoring qualitative RFP criteria requires deconstructing abstract concepts into a matrix of weighted, measurable indicators.

- 
### [When Is It Appropriate to Use a Pass Fail System Instead of a Weighted Scoring Model in an Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/when-is-it-appropriate-to-use-a-pass-fail-system-instead-of-a-weighted-scoring-model-in-an-rfp/)
![A sleek blue and white mechanism with a focused lens symbolizes Pre-Trade Analytics for Digital Asset Derivatives. A glowing turquoise sphere represents a Block Trade within a Liquidity Pool, demonstrating High-Fidelity Execution via RFQ protocol for Price Discovery in Dark Pool Market Microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/advanced-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system-for-optimal-price-discovery-and-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

A pass/fail system enforces absolute compliance, while a weighted model discerns relative value to identify the optimal strategic fit.

- 
### [How Can an Organization Objectively Weight RFP Evaluation Criteria?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-objectively-weight-rfp-evaluation-criteria/)
![A central, intricate blue mechanism, evocative of an Execution Management System EMS or Prime RFQ, embodies algorithmic trading. Transparent rings signify dynamic liquidity pools and price discovery for institutional digital asset derivatives. Background diagonals abstractly depict market microstructure optimization via RFQ protocols ensuring high-fidelity execution.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-framework-driving-high-fidelity-rfq-execution-and-optimized-market-microstructure-for-capital-efficiency.jpg)

An organization objectively weights RFP criteria by architecting a system that translates strategic priorities into a defensible, mathematical framework.

- 
### [How Do You Properly Weight Rfp Evaluation Criteria to Reflect Project Priorities?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-properly-weight-rfp-evaluation-criteria-to-reflect-project-priorities/)
![The image depicts two intersecting structural beams, symbolizing a robust Prime RFQ framework for institutional digital asset derivatives. These elements represent interconnected liquidity pools and execution pathways, crucial for high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement within market microstructure. The intersection highlights cross-market price discovery and multi-leg spread capabilities, underpinned by algorithmic trading protocols.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-cross-market-execution-architecture-for-digital-assets.jpg)

Properly weighting RFP criteria translates strategic priorities into a quantifiable decision architecture, ensuring vendor selection is a direct reflection of project value.

- 
### [What Are the Primary Risks Associated with a Purely Price-Focused Rfp Evaluation?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-risks-associated-with-a-purely-price-focused-rfp-evaluation/)
![Abstract metallic and dark components symbolize complex market microstructure and fragmented liquidity pools for digital asset derivatives. A smooth disc represents high-fidelity execution and price discovery facilitated by advanced RFQ protocols on a robust Prime RFQ, enabling precise atomic settlement for institutional multi-leg spreads.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-market-microstructure-optimizing-rfq-protocols-for-high-fidelity-execution-on-prime-os.jpg)

A price-focused RFP evaluation creates systemic risk by optimizing for a single, flawed metric, ignoring total cost and long-term value.

- 
### [How Can a Company Quantify Qualitative Risks in an RFP Evaluation?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-a-company-quantify-qualitative-risks-in-an-rfp-evaluation/)
![A beige spool feeds dark, reflective material into an advanced processing unit, illuminated by a vibrant blue light. This depicts high-fidelity execution of institutional digital asset derivatives through a Prime RFQ, enabling precise price discovery for aggregated RFQ inquiries within complex market microstructure, ensuring atomic settlement.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-prime-os-3.jpg)

Quantifying qualitative RFP risks translates subjective vendor attributes into an objective, risk-adjusted cost for superior decision-making.

- 
### [How Should Weighting Be Determined for Different RFP Evaluation Criteria in a Complex Procurement?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-should-weighting-be-determined-for-different-rfp-evaluation-criteria-in-a-complex-procurement/)
![A precise RFQ engine extends into an institutional digital asset liquidity pool, symbolizing high-fidelity execution and advanced price discovery within complex market microstructure. This embodies a Principal's operational framework for multi-leg spread strategies and capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-engine-interfacing-core-liquidity-system.jpg)

Determining RFP evaluation weights is the architectural act of translating strategic priorities into a quantifiable, defensible decision framework.

- 
### [What Is the Relationship between Rfp Evaluation Effectiveness and Long-Term Supplier Relationship Management?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-relationship-between-rfp-evaluation-effectiveness-and-long-term-supplier-relationship-management/)
![Modular institutional-grade execution system components reveal luminous green data pathways, symbolizing high-fidelity cross-asset connectivity. This depicts intricate market microstructure facilitating RFQ protocol integration for atomic settlement of digital asset derivatives within a Principal's operational framework, underpinned by a Prime RFQ intelligence layer.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/modular-high-fidelity-execution-architecture-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-integration-and-principals-operational-framework-optimization.jpg)

Effective RFP evaluation architects the operational and relational framework for maximizing long-term supplier value.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "How Can an Organization Effectively Weight Non-Financial Factors in an RFP?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-effectively-weight-non-financial-factors-in-an-rfp/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-effectively-weight-non-financial-factors-in-an-rfp/"
    },
    "headline": "How Can an Organization Effectively Weight Non-Financial Factors in an RFP? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "An organization weights non-financial RFP factors by systemically encoding strategic priorities into a quantitative, multi-criteria evaluation framework. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-effectively-weight-non-financial-factors-in-an-rfp/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-09T18:09:15+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-10-30T16:40:11+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-execution-protocol.jpg",
        "caption": "Two dark, circular, precision-engineered components, stacked and reflecting, embody a sophisticated Principal's Operational Framework. This Institutional Grade system for Digital Asset Derivatives ensures High-Fidelity Execution of Block Trades via advanced RFQ Protocols. It highlights the Intelligence Layer driving Atomic Settlement, optimizing Capital Efficiency, and leveraging Quantitative Analysis for Alpha Generation within complex Market Microstructure. This framework supports Smart Order Routing for Best Execution."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Analytic Hierarchy Process",
        "Balanced Scorecard",
        "Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis",
        "Non-Financial Criteria",
        "Procurement Strategy",
        "RFP Evaluation",
        "RFP Scoring Methodology",
        "Strategic Sourcing",
        "Supplier Selection",
        "Total Cost of Ownership",
        "Vendor Risk Management",
        "Weighted Scoring"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-effectively-weight-non-financial-factors-in-an-rfp/
