# How Can an Organization Effectively Weight RFP Evaluation Criteria? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-09
**Categories:** Question

---

![Precision-engineered institutional grade components, representing prime brokerage infrastructure, intersect via a translucent teal bar embodying a high-fidelity execution RFQ protocol. This depicts seamless liquidity aggregation and atomic settlement for digital asset derivatives, reflecting complex market microstructure and efficient price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-prime-os-core.jpg)

![A sophisticated digital asset derivatives RFQ engine's core components are depicted, showcasing precise market microstructure for optimal price discovery. Its central hub facilitates algorithmic trading, ensuring high-fidelity execution across multi-leg spreads](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimizing-multi-leg-spreads-for-optimal-capital-efficiency.jpg)

## Concept

![A dark central hub with three reflective, translucent blades extending. This represents a Principal's operational framework for digital asset derivatives, processing aggregated liquidity and multi-leg spread inquiries](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-rfq-protocol-engine-for-high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

## The Procurement Decision Engine

An organization’s approach to a Request for Proposal (RFP) is a direct reflection of its operational maturity. A sophisticated entity understands that the value of a procurement decision is a function of the total system impact, not merely the acquisition cost. Therefore, the mechanism for evaluating proposals cannot be an administrative checklist; it must be a calibrated decision engine. The process of weighting evaluation criteria is the act of programming that engine.

It transforms the abstract [strategic priorities](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-properly-weight-rfp-evaluation-criteria-to-reflect-strategic-priorities/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) of the enterprise ▴ be it technological resilience, supply chain stability, or long-term [total cost of ownership](https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost-of-ownership/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) ▴ into a quantitative, defensible, and repeatable logic. This is the foundational discipline for moving procurement from a cost center to a strategic value driver.

At its core, weighting criteria is an exercise in applied strategy. It forces a clear-eyed internal consensus on what truly constitutes success for a given project. Without this quantitative framework, evaluations default to subjective interpretation, political influence, or an over-reliance on the most easily measured variable ▴ price. An unweighted or poorly weighted evaluation process is an open system, vulnerable to randomness and bias.

A properly weighted system is a closed loop, where the final output ▴ the selection of a partner or solution ▴ is a direct and traceable consequence of the organization’s stated strategic inputs. This transforms the RFP from a simple solicitation document into a powerful instrument of corporate policy execution.

> A calibrated weighting system converts strategic intent into a quantifiable and defensible procurement outcome.

![A sleek, angular metallic system, an algorithmic trading engine, features a central intelligence layer. It embodies high-fidelity RFQ protocols, optimizing price discovery and best execution for institutional digital asset derivatives, managing counterparty risk and slippage](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-for-best-execution.jpg)

## From Subjective Assessment to Systemic Valuation

The transition from a qualitative review to a weighted evaluation marks a critical evolutionary step for a procurement function. It signifies a shift from viewing proposals as competing narratives to be judged on their persuasive power, to seeing them as complex data sets to be analyzed against a predefined model of value. This model, embodied in the weighted scorecard, serves as the immutable source of truth throughout the evaluation lifecycle.

It provides every stakeholder, from the technical end-user to the chief financial officer, with a common language and a shared logical framework. The weights assigned to each criterion are the syntax of this language, defining the precise relationship and hierarchy between diverse requirements like technical specifications, service level agreements, implementation support, and financial stability.

This systemic approach ensures that the most critical factors receive the requisite influence on the final decision. For instance, in the procurement of a core enterprise resource planning (ERP) system, criteria related to data security, system uptime, and vendor viability may be assigned significantly higher weights than user interface aesthetics or short-term cost. This prevents a lower-cost, higher-risk solution from appearing artificially attractive.

The weighting process is the primary control mechanism an organization has to ensure that its procurement decisions align with its long-term operational and strategic health, rather than short-term budgetary pressures. It is the architectural blueprint for a sound decision.

![Intersecting metallic structures symbolize RFQ protocol pathways for institutional digital asset derivatives. They represent high-fidelity execution of multi-leg spreads across diverse liquidity pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-framework-optimizing-multi-leg-spreads-and-liquidity-aggregation-for-best-execution.jpg)

![A sleek, segmented cream and dark gray automated device, depicting an institutional grade Prime RFQ engine. It represents precise execution management system functionality for digital asset derivatives, optimizing price discovery and high-fidelity execution within market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-engine-optimal-institutional-digital-asset-execution-system.jpg)

## Strategy

![A precise RFQ engine extends into an institutional digital asset liquidity pool, symbolizing high-fidelity execution and advanced price discovery within complex market microstructure. This embodies a Principal's operational framework for multi-leg spread strategies and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-engine-interfacing-core-liquidity-system.jpg)

## Frameworks for Rational Decision Architecture

Developing a robust weighting strategy is contingent on selecting an appropriate framework that aligns with the complexity of the procurement and the organization’s analytical maturity. The chosen methodology dictates how strategic priorities are translated into numerical weights, forming the core logic of the evaluation engine. These frameworks range from simple, direct systems suitable for straightforward purchases to complex, multi-layered models required for strategic acquisitions of critical systems or long-term partners. The selection of a framework is the first and most critical strategic decision in the RFP process itself.

![A sleek Principal's Operational Framework connects to a glowing, intricate teal ring structure. This depicts an institutional-grade RFQ protocol engine, facilitating high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives, enabling private quotation and optimal price discovery within market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-execution-engine-for-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq.jpg)

## Direct Weighting a Foundational Method

The most accessible framework is [Direct Weighting](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-analytic-hierarchy-process-differ-from-direct-weighting-in-rfp-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). In this model, the [evaluation committee](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-should-an-rfp-evaluation-committee-be-structured-to-ensure-an-unbiased-and-effective-decision/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), composed of key stakeholders, assigns a percentage value to each high-level evaluation criterion, with the total of all weights summing to 100%. For example, ‘Technical Solution’ might be assigned 40%, ‘Cost’ 25%, ‘Vendor Capabilities’ 20%, and ‘Implementation & Support’ 15%.

Each high-level criterion is then broken down into specific, measurable sub-criteria. The weight of the parent category is distributed among its children.

This method’s strength lies in its simplicity and transparency. It creates a clear, easily communicated model that is sufficient for many common procurement scenarios. The primary challenge of direct weighting is the potential for arbitrary assignments if the process is not governed by rigorous stakeholder debate and a strong project lead who can force a consensus on the relative importance of each criterion. It is most effective when the criteria are distinct and the number of primary categories is manageable.

- **Stakeholder Alignment** ▴ The process begins by assembling a cross-functional team of stakeholders who will be impacted by the procurement decision.

- **Criteria Definition** ▴ This team collaborates to define the primary evaluation categories that represent the total value proposition.

- **Weight Allocation** ▴ Through a process of structured discussion and negotiation, the team allocates points or percentages to each category, ensuring the total sums to 100.

- **Sub-Criteria Distribution** ▴ The weight of each primary category is then cascaded down to its constituent sub-criteria, creating a granular scoring model.

![A sophisticated, multi-component system propels a sleek, teal-colored digital asset derivative trade. The complex internal structure represents a proprietary RFQ protocol engine with liquidity aggregation and price discovery mechanisms](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principals-high-fidelity-rfq-engine-for-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

## Pairwise Comparison for Enhanced Precision

For more complex or contentious decisions, [Pairwise Comparison](https://prime.greeks.live/area/pairwise-comparison/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) offers a more structured and less arbitrary approach to determining weights. This method, often a precursor to more advanced models like the [Analytic Hierarchy Process](https://prime.greeks.live/area/analytic-hierarchy-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (AHP), forces evaluators to compare only two criteria at a time. For each pair, they must decide which is more important and by how much, typically on a simple scale (e.g. 1 = Equally important, 3 = Moderately more important, 5 = Strongly more important).

These judgments are recorded in a matrix. A mathematical process is then used to synthesize these discrete comparisons into a consistent set of weights for all criteria. This method is exceptionally powerful for breaking down cognitive biases and forcing a rational, structured debate among stakeholders.

By simplifying the decision to a series of binary choices, it prevents the cognitive overload that can occur when trying to rank ten different criteria simultaneously. The resulting weights are a product of a logical process, making them more robust and defensible.

> By breaking down a complex decision into a series of binary judgments, pairwise comparison builds a more consistent and defensible weighting structure.

The table below illustrates a simplified comparison of these two strategic frameworks, highlighting their operational characteristics and suitability for different procurement contexts.

| Framework Feature | Direct Weighting | Pairwise Comparison |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Cognitive Load | High (Requires simultaneous comparison of all criteria) | Low (Requires comparison of only two criteria at a time) |
| Objectivity Level | Moderate (Can be influenced by strong personalities or anchoring bias) | High (Derives weights from a structured, mathematical process) |
| Implementation Time | Low to Moderate | Moderate to High |
| Best Suited For | Standard, low-to-medium complexity procurements with clear criteria. | High-value, strategic procurements with multiple, competing criteria. |
| Defensibility | Good (Relies on documented consensus) | Excellent (Relies on a documented, repeatable mathematical procedure) |

![A spherical system, partially revealing intricate concentric layers, depicts the market microstructure of an institutional-grade platform. A translucent sphere, symbolizing an incoming RFQ or block trade, floats near the exposed execution engine, visualizing price discovery within a dark pool for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-microstructure.jpg)

![A central RFQ engine flanked by distinct liquidity pools represents a Principal's operational framework. This abstract system enables high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives, optimizing capital efficiency and price discovery within market microstructure for institutional trading](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-engine-optimal-execution-for-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

## Execution

![Intersecting teal and dark blue planes, with reflective metallic lines, depict structured pathways for institutional digital asset derivatives trading. This symbolizes high-fidelity execution, RFQ protocol orchestration, and multi-venue liquidity aggregation within a Prime RFQ, reflecting precise market microstructure and optimal price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-rfq-execution-liquidity-microstructure.jpg)

## The Operational Playbook for Weighting

The execution of a weighted scoring model is a disciplined, multi-stage process that translates strategic agreement into a functional evaluation tool. This playbook provides a granular, step-by-step procedure for implementing a robust weighting system, ensuring that the final RFP scorecard is a precise and powerful instrument for decision-making.

- **Assemble the Evaluation Committee** ▴ The process commences with the formal chartering of an evaluation committee. This group must be cross-functional, representing all constituencies with a stake in the outcome. Typical members include representatives from procurement, IT, finance, legal, and the primary business unit or end-users of the product or service. A project manager or procurement lead must be designated to orchestrate the process.

- **Conduct Stakeholder Requirement Workshops** ▴ The committee lead facilitates a series of workshops to elicit, document, and consolidate all potential evaluation criteria. The goal is to create an exhaustive long-list of requirements, from high-level strategic fits to detailed technical specifications. Each potential criterion should be clearly defined to avoid ambiguity during the scoring phase.

- **Categorize and Rationalize Criteria** ▴ The long-list is then rationalized and structured into a logical hierarchy. This involves grouping related items into broader categories (e.g. ‘[Functional Capabilities](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-functional-and-non-functional-requirements-in-a-technology-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite),’ ‘Technical Architecture,’ ‘Lifecycle Cost,’ ‘Vendor Viability’). This is also the stage where requirements are classified as mandatory (pass/fail) or scored. Mandatory requirements act as a gateway; a vendor failing to meet one is disqualified, simplifying the subsequent scoring of the qualified pool.

- **Select and Apply the Weighting Framework** ▴ Based on the project’s strategic importance, the committee selects the appropriate weighting methodology (e.g. Direct Weighting or Pairwise Comparison). For a critical system, a more rigorous method is advisable. The committee then executes the chosen method in a facilitated session, debating and deciding on the relative importance of each category and sub-criterion until a full set of weights is derived.

- **Design and Validate the [Scoring Rubric](https://prime.greeks.live/area/scoring-rubric/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)** ▴ With weights established, a detailed scoring rubric is developed. For each scored criterion, a clear scale (e.g. 0-5 or 1-10) must be defined. A score of 0 might mean ‘Requirement not met,’ while a top score indicates ‘Exceeds requirement in a way that provides additional value.’ These definitions are critical for ensuring scoring consistency across multiple evaluators. The final weighted scorecard, with all criteria, weights, and scoring rubrics, should be formally approved by the committee before the RFP is issued.

![A central, multifaceted RFQ engine processes aggregated inquiries via precise execution pathways and robust capital conduits. This institutional-grade system optimizes liquidity aggregation, enabling high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-rfq-protocol-engine-high-fidelity-digital-asset-execution.jpg)

## Quantitative Modeling the Scorecard in Action

The output of the playbook is a quantitative model. The following table represents a completed weighted scorecard for a hypothetical procurement of a new Customer Relationship Management (CRM) platform. This model demonstrates how high-level strategic weights are cascaded down to granular sub-criteria, and how raw scores are translated into a final, weighted decision metric.

| Evaluation Criterion | Weight (%) | Vendor A Score (1-10) | Vendor A Weighted Score | Vendor B Score (1-10) | Vendor B Weighted Score |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1.0 Functional Capabilities (40%) | 40.0 | | 34.0 | | 30.0 |
| 1.1 Contact Management | 10.0 | 9 | 9.0 | 8 | 8.0 |
| 1.2 Sales Automation | 15.0 | 8 | 12.0 | 7 | 10.5 |
| 1.3 Reporting & Analytics | 15.0 | 9 | 13.5 | 7 | 10.5 |
| 2.0 Lifecycle Cost (30%) | 30.0 | | 22.5 | | 27.0 |
| 2.1 Licensing Fees | 15.0 | 7 | 10.5 | 9 | 13.5 |
| 2.2 Implementation Cost | 10.0 | 8 | 8.0 | 9 | 9.0 |
| 2.3 Support & Maintenance | 5.0 | 8 | 4.0 | 9 | 4.5 |
| 3.0 Vendor Viability & Support (30%) | 30.0 | | 25.0 | | 23.0 |
| 3.1 Financial Stability | 10.0 | 9 | 9.0 | 8 | 8.0 |
| 3.2 Implementation Partner Ecosystem | 10.0 | 8 | 8.0 | 7 | 7.0 |
| 3.3 Customer Support Quality | 10.0 | 8 | 8.0 | 8 | 8.0 |
| Total Weighted Score | 100.0 | | 81.5 | | 80.0 |

The formula for each [weighted score](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-counterparty-performance-score-differ-from-a-traditional-credit-score/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is ▴ Weighted Score = (Weight / 100) Raw Score (Category Weight / 100) 100 or more simply (Sub-Criterion Weight / 100) Raw Score. The category weighted score is the sum of its sub-criteria’s weighted scores. The model clearly indicates that while Vendor B is the lower-cost solution, Vendor A’s superior functional capabilities and stronger vendor profile make it the winning choice based on the pre-defined strategic priorities.

> A well-structured scorecard provides an unambiguous, data-driven foundation for the final selection and subsequent contract negotiation.

![A sleek cream-colored device with a dark blue optical sensor embodies Price Discovery for Digital Asset Derivatives. It signifies High-Fidelity Execution via RFQ Protocols, driven by an Intelligence Layer optimizing Market Microstructure for Algorithmic Trading on a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-high-fidelity-execution-engine-optimized-rfq-protocols-prime-os-intelligence-layer.jpg)

## Predictive Scenario Analysis the Weighting Dilemma

Consider a mid-sized manufacturing firm, “AxleCorp,” seeking a new supply chain management (SCM) software suite. The evaluation committee is split. The operations team prioritizes real-time inventory tracking and predictive analytics above all else.

The finance department, facing budget constraints, is pushing for a solution with the lowest possible five-year total cost of ownership (TCO). The IT department is concerned primarily with ease of integration into their existing ERP system and data security protocols.

Initially, they agree on a Direct Weighting model that seems balanced ▴ Functional Capabilities (35%), TCO (35%), and Technical Integration/Security (30%). Under this model, “SupplyChainPro,” a feature-rich but expensive and complex system, narrowly beats “LogisticsLite,” a budget-friendly but less advanced option. The finance team contests the outcome, arguing the TCO weight is still too low.

To resolve the impasse, the procurement lead initiates a scenario analysis. They create two alternative weighting models. Scenario A, the “Operations-First” model, adjusts the weights to ▴ Capabilities (50%), TCO (20%), Technical (30%). Scenario B, the “Finance-First” model, adjusts them to ▴ Capabilities (25%), TCO (50%), Technical (25%).

- **Under Scenario A**, SupplyChainPro wins by a significant margin, as its superior features are heavily amplified. The model predicts higher operational efficiency but a 3-year ROI.

- **Under Scenario B**, LogisticsLite becomes the clear winner, as its low cost is the dominant factor. The model predicts a rapid 1-year ROI but notes potential operational gaps within two years.

Presenting these two scenarios with their predicted outcomes forces a more sophisticated conversation. The committee is no longer arguing about abstract percentages but about concrete business trade-offs. They can now visualize the consequences of their priorities. After a structured debate, they realize that a slight operational delay is more acceptable than the long-term risk of an underpowered system.

They agree on a final, revised weighting of Capabilities (45%), TCO (25%), and Technical (30%). This decision, born from quantitative modeling and scenario analysis, is one the entire organization can stand behind. It is a strategic choice, not a mathematical compromise. This analytical rigor is the hallmark of a mature procurement system.

![A central dark nexus with intersecting data conduits and swirling translucent elements depicts a sophisticated RFQ protocol's intelligence layer. This visualizes dynamic market microstructure, precise price discovery, and high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives, optimizing capital efficiency and mitigating counterparty risk](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-visualizing-high-fidelity-execution-and-market-microstructure-dynamics.jpg)

## References

- Sarkis, Joseph, and Srinivas Talluri. “A relational model for evaluating and selecting suppliers.” Journal of Supply Chain Management 38.1 (2002) ▴ 16-29.

- Saaty, Thomas L. “Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process.” International journal of services sciences 1.1 (2008) ▴ 83-98.

- Weber, Charles A. John R. Current, and W. C. Benton. “Vendor survey and selection ▴ a comparative methodology.” Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management 27.1 (1991) ▴ 19-27.

- Ho, William, Xiaowei Xu, and Prasanta K. Dey. “Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection ▴ A literature review.” European Journal of Operational Research 202.1 (2010) ▴ 16-24.

- De Boer, L. E. Labro, and P. Morlacchi. “A review of methods supporting supplier selection.” European journal of purchasing & supply management 7.2 (2001) ▴ 75-89.

- Tahriri, F. M. R. Osman, A. Ali, R. M. Yusuff, and A. Esfandiary. “A review of supplier selection methods in manufacturing industries.” Suranaree Journal of Science and Technology 15.3 (2008) ▴ 201-208.

- Chai, Junyi, James NK Liu, and Eric WT Ngai. “Application of decision-making techniques in supplier selection ▴ A systematic review of literature.” Expert systems with applications 40.10 (2013) ▴ 3872-3885.

![A precisely engineered multi-component structure, split to reveal its granular core, symbolizes the complex market microstructure of institutional digital asset derivatives. This visual metaphor represents the unbundling of multi-leg spreads, facilitating transparent price discovery and high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols within a Principal's operational framework](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-revealing-market-microstructure-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-atomic-settlement-within-principals-operational-framework.jpg)

## Reflection

![A sleek metallic teal execution engine, representing a Crypto Derivatives OS, interfaces with a luminous pre-trade analytics display. This abstract view depicts institutional RFQ protocols enabling high-fidelity execution for multi-leg spreads, optimizing market microstructure and atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/advanced-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-market-microstructure-analysis.jpg)

## The Decision as an Asset

The framework for weighting [RFP evaluation criteria](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation-criteria/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is ultimately a tool for forging organizational clarity. The final scorecard, with its meticulously assigned weights and scores, is more than a justification for a decision; it is the tangible artifact of that clarity. It represents a system of thought, a repeatable process for converting competing internal priorities into a single, coherent, and strategic course of action. The true value of this process is not the selection of a single vendor, but the institutionalization of a rational decision-making capability.

This capability becomes a durable asset, allowing the organization to navigate future procurement challenges with greater speed, precision, and confidence. How is your organization’s current evaluation process architected, and what does it reveal about your strategic priorities?

![The abstract visual depicts a sophisticated, transparent execution engine showcasing market microstructure for institutional digital asset derivatives. Its central matching engine facilitates RFQ protocol execution, revealing internal algorithmic trading logic and high-fidelity execution pathways](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-rfq-engine-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost-of-ownership/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A central mechanism of an Institutional Grade Crypto Derivatives OS with dynamically rotating arms. These translucent blue panels symbolize High-Fidelity Execution via an RFQ Protocol, facilitating Price Discovery and Liquidity Aggregation for Digital Asset Derivatives within complex Market Microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-engine-for-digital-asset-derivatives-best-execution.jpg)

## Total Cost of Ownership

Meaning ▴ Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) represents a comprehensive financial estimate encompassing all direct and indirect expenditures associated with an asset or system throughout its entire operational lifecycle. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-properly-weight-rfp-evaluation-criteria-to-reflect-strategic-priorities/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A symmetrical, multi-faceted digital structure, a liquidity aggregation engine, showcases translucent teal and grey panels. This visualizes diverse RFQ channels and market segments, enabling high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-liquidity-aggregation-engine-for-digital-asset-derivatives-trading.jpg)

## Strategic Priorities

Weighting RFP criteria translates strategic priorities into a quantitative decision engine for defensible vendor selection. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-should-an-rfp-evaluation-committee-be-structured-to-ensure-an-unbiased-and-effective-decision/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Two dark, circular, precision-engineered components, stacked and reflecting, symbolize a Principal's Operational Framework. This layered architecture facilitates High-Fidelity Execution for Block Trades via RFQ Protocols, ensuring Atomic Settlement and Capital Efficiency within Market Microstructure for Digital Asset Derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-execution-protocol.jpg)

## Evaluation Committee

A structured RFP committee, governed by pre-defined criteria and bias mitigation protocols, ensures defensible and high-value procurement decisions. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-analytic-hierarchy-process-differ-from-direct-weighting-in-rfp-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A cutaway view reveals an advanced RFQ protocol engine for institutional digital asset derivatives. Intricate coiled components represent algorithmic liquidity provision and portfolio margin calculations](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocol-engine-digital-asset-derivatives-core-internal-mechanism-visualized.jpg)

## Direct Weighting

AHP derives weights from structured pairwise comparisons, while Direct Weighting assigns them based on absolute declaration. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/analytic-hierarchy-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Robust institutional Prime RFQ core connects to a precise RFQ protocol engine. Multi-leg spread execution blades propel a digital asset derivative target, optimizing price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-proto-insti-digital-asset-derivs-hi-fi-exec-capital-effi-risk-mgmt.jpg)

## Analytic Hierarchy Process

Meaning ▴ The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) constitutes a structured methodology for organizing and analyzing complex decision problems, particularly those involving multiple, often conflicting, criteria and subjective judgments. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/pairwise-comparison/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sophisticated, modular mechanical assembly illustrates an RFQ protocol for institutional digital asset derivatives. Reflective elements and distinct quadrants symbolize dynamic liquidity aggregation and high-fidelity execution for Bitcoin options](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-architecture.jpg)

## Pairwise Comparison

Meaning ▴ Pairwise Comparison is a systematic method for evaluating entities by comparing them two at a time, across a defined set of criteria, to establish a relative preference or value. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-functional-and-non-functional-requirements-in-a-technology-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A complex, reflective apparatus with concentric rings and metallic arms supporting two distinct spheres. This embodies RFQ protocols, market microstructure, and high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-3.jpg)

## Functional Capabilities

Functional requirements define what a system does; non-functional requirements define the quality and constraints of how it performs. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/scoring-rubric/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A polished metallic modular hub with four radiating arms represents an advanced RFQ execution engine. This system aggregates multi-venue liquidity for institutional digital asset derivatives, enabling high-fidelity execution and precise price discovery across diverse counterparty risk profiles, powered by a sophisticated intelligence layer](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/principal-rfq-hub-digital-asset-derivatives-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## Scoring Rubric

Meaning ▴ A Scoring Rubric represents a meticulously structured evaluation framework, comprising a defined set of criteria and associated weighting mechanisms, employed to objectively assess the performance, compliance, or quality of a system, process, or entity, often within the rigorous context of institutional digital asset operations or algorithmic execution performance assessment. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-counterparty-performance-score-differ-from-a-traditional-credit-score/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Intersecting abstract geometric planes depict institutional grade RFQ protocols and market microstructure. Speckled surfaces reflect complex order book dynamics and implied volatility, while smooth planes represent high-fidelity execution channels and private quotation systems for digital asset derivatives within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-rfq-protocols-digital-asset-microstructure-execution.jpg)

## Weighted Score

A counterparty performance score is a dynamic, multi-factor model of transactional reliability, distinct from a traditional credit score's historical debt focus. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation-criteria/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A vibrant blue digital asset, encircled by a sleek metallic ring representing an RFQ protocol, emerges from a reflective Prime RFQ surface. This visualizes sophisticated market microstructure and high-fidelity execution within an institutional liquidity pool, ensuring optimal price discovery and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-execution-framework.jpg)

## Rfp Evaluation Criteria

Meaning ▴ RFP Evaluation Criteria define the structured framework employed by institutional entities to systematically assess vendor proposals for complex technology and service procurements, particularly within the domain of institutional digital asset derivatives infrastructure, ensuring precise alignment with defined operational requirements and strategic objectives. </a>

**Tags:** [RFP Weighted Scoring](https://options.greeks.live/area/rfp-weighted-scoring/), [Analytic Hierarchy Process](https://options.greeks.live/area/analytic-hierarchy-process/), [Procurement Strategy](https://options.greeks.live/area/procurement-strategy/), [RFP Evaluation Criteria](https://options.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation-criteria/), [Vendor Evaluation](https://options.greeks.live/area/vendor-evaluation/), [Procurement Process](https://options.greeks.live/area/procurement-process/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [How Does a Hybrid Rfp Model Balance Pass/Fail Gates with Weighted Scoring?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-hybrid-rfp-model-balance-pass-fail-gates-with-weighted-scoring/)
![A light blue sphere, representing a Liquidity Pool for Digital Asset Derivatives, balances a flat white object, signifying a Multi-Leg Spread Block Trade. This rests upon a cylindrical Prime Brokerage OS EMS, illustrating High-Fidelity Execution via RFQ Protocol for Price Discovery within Market Microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-prime-os-high-precision.jpg)

A hybrid RFP model balances pass/fail gates for non-negotiable compliance with weighted scoring to optimize for strategic value.

- 
### [What Are the Primary Risks of Assigning Too High a Weight to Price in an Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-risks-of-assigning-too-high-a-weight-to-price-in-an-rfp/)
![A precision sphere, an Execution Management System EMS, probes a Digital Asset Liquidity Pool. This signifies High-Fidelity Execution via Smart Order Routing for institutional-grade digital asset derivatives. It highlights Price Discovery and Pre-Trade Analytics within a Principal's Prime RFQ framework.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-rfq-engine-orchestrating-global-digital-asset-derivatives-liquidity-pool-price-discovery-and-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

Over-weighting price in an RFP systemically selects for low initial cost, risking higher lifecycle expenses and degraded operational quality.

- 
### [What Are the Most Common Categories for Rfp Evaluation Criteria?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-categories-for-rfp-evaluation-criteria/)
![A precision-engineered metallic and glass system depicts the core of an Institutional Grade Prime RFQ, facilitating high-fidelity execution for Digital Asset Derivatives. Transparent layers represent visible liquidity pools and the intricate market microstructure supporting RFQ protocol processing, ensuring atomic settlement capabilities.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/robust-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-platform-for-optimized-rfq-protocol-execution-and-deep-liquidity-access.jpg)

RFP evaluation criteria are a weighted, multi-category system for translating vendor proposals into a defensible, value-optimized decision.

- 
### [What Is the Optimal Method for Weighting Criteria in an Rfp Scoring Matrix?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-optimal-method-for-weighting-criteria-in-an-rfp-scoring-matrix/)
![A luminous central hub with radiating arms signifies an institutional RFQ protocol engine. It embodies seamless liquidity aggregation and high-fidelity execution for multi-leg spread strategies. Varied quadrants represent diverse market microstructure, optimizing capital efficiency within a principal's operational framework, mitigating counterparty risk.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-hub-for-optimal-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

The optimal method for weighting RFP criteria is a structured, bias-reducing system like AHP that translates strategic priorities into a defensible, mathematical framework.

- 
### [How Can Organizations Quantify Qualitative Criteria in an Rfp Scoring Matrix?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-organizations-quantify-qualitative-criteria-in-an-rfp-scoring-matrix/)
![A symmetrical, multi-faceted structure depicts an institutional Digital Asset Derivatives execution system. Its central crystalline core represents high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement. Distinct principal entities feature API integration points, symbolizing robust RFQ protocol connectivity for cross-asset liquidity aggregation and block trades.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-microstructure.jpg)

A weighted scoring matrix translates subjective vendor qualities into objective, comparable data points to ensure a strategically aligned and defensible RFP decision.

- 
### [How Can an Organization Effectively Weight an Rfp Evaluation Matrix to Reflect Its True Priorities?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-effectively-weight-an-rfp-evaluation-matrix-to-reflect-its-true-priorities/)
![A sleek, spherical white and blue module featuring a central black aperture and teal lens, representing the core Intelligence Layer for Institutional Trading in Digital Asset Derivatives. It visualizes High-Fidelity Execution within an RFQ protocol, enabling precise Price Discovery and optimizing the Principal's Operational Framework for Crypto Derivatives OS.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-lens-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution.jpg)

An RFP evaluation matrix is weighted by translating strategic priorities into numerical values to ensure a data-driven, objective procurement decision.

- 
### [What Are the Most Common Pitfalls in Designing RFP Weighting and Evaluation Criteria?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-pitfalls-in-designing-rfp-weighting-and-evaluation-criteria/)
![A metallic, modular trading interface with black and grey circular elements, signifying distinct market microstructure components and liquidity pools. A precise, blue-cored probe diagonally integrates, representing an advanced RFQ engine for granular price discovery and atomic settlement of multi-leg spread strategies in institutional digital asset derivatives. This optimizes capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-system-facilitating-high-fidelity-execution-price-discovery.jpg)

The most common RFP design pitfalls are over-weighting price, using vague criteria, and lacking stakeholder consensus.

- 
### [How Can an Organization Transition from a Single to a Dual RFP Weighting Model?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-transition-from-a-single-to-a-dual-rfp-weighting-model/)
![Abstract dual-cone object reflects RFQ Protocol dynamism. It signifies robust Liquidity Aggregation, High-Fidelity Execution, and Principal-to-Principal negotiation. Essential for Crypto Derivatives OS Block Trades, ensuring Atomic Settlement and Volatility Surface integrity.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-grade-rfq-execution-framework-for-digital-asset-derivatives-optimal-liquidity-aggregation-and-atomic-settlement.jpg)

Transitioning to a dual RFP weighting model separates qualitative from financial evaluation, enabling a value-based, data-driven procurement decision.

- 
### [How Can Weighting in an RFP Scoring Matrix Be Adjusted for Strategic Priorities?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-weighting-in-an-rfp-scoring-matrix-be-adjusted-for-strategic-priorities/)
![A futuristic, metallic structure with reflective surfaces and a central optical mechanism, symbolizing a robust Prime RFQ for institutional digital asset derivatives. It enables high-fidelity execution of RFQ protocols, optimizing price discovery and liquidity aggregation across diverse liquidity pools with minimal slippage.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-platform-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-optimized-execution-management-system-with-robust-liquidity-sourcing.jpg)

Adjusting RFP scoring weights translates strategic priorities into a quantitative framework, ensuring vendor selection aligns with core goals.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "How Can an Organization Effectively Weight RFP Evaluation Criteria?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-effectively-weight-rfp-evaluation-criteria/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-effectively-weight-rfp-evaluation-criteria/"
    },
    "headline": "How Can an Organization Effectively Weight RFP Evaluation Criteria? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "A structured weighting framework translates strategic priorities into a quantitative, defensible procurement decision engine. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-effectively-weight-rfp-evaluation-criteria/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-09T16:17:51+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-08-09T16:19:11+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocol-engine-digital-asset-derivatives-core-internal-mechanism-visualized.jpg",
        "caption": "A sophisticated cutaway reveals the inner workings of an institutional-grade RFQ protocol engine, designed for digital asset derivatives trading. Its intricate internal structure, with coiled metallic components, symbolizes complex algorithmic liquidity provision and dynamic portfolio margin calculations. Transparent blue sections expose the quantitative analytics core, enabling high-fidelity execution and low-latency order routing. This Prime RFQ component ensures best execution and mitigates information leakage."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Analytic Hierarchy Process",
        "Decision Matrix",
        "Pairwise Comparison",
        "Procurement Process",
        "Procurement Strategy",
        "RFP Evaluation Criteria",
        "RFP Weighted Scoring",
        "Scoring Rubric",
        "Strategic Sourcing",
        "Supplier Selection",
        "Total Cost of Ownership",
        "Vendor Evaluation"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-effectively-weight-rfp-evaluation-criteria/
