# How Can an Organization Ensure an Unbiased Evaluation of Rfp Responses? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-10
**Categories:** Question

---

![Intersecting geometric planes symbolize complex market microstructure and aggregated liquidity. A central nexus represents an RFQ hub for high-fidelity execution of multi-leg spread strategies](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution-market-microstructure-optimisation.jpg)

![Intersecting angular structures symbolize dynamic market microstructure, multi-leg spread strategies. Translucent spheres represent institutional liquidity blocks, digital asset derivatives, precisely balanced](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-platform-4.jpg)

## Concept

![A sleek, multi-component device with a prominent lens, embodying a sophisticated RFQ workflow engine. Its modular design signifies integrated liquidity pools and dynamic price discovery for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-microstructure-2.jpg)

## The System of Adjudication

An organization’s approach to evaluating Request for Proposal (RFP) responses functions as a direct reflection of its internal governance and operational discipline. It is a system of adjudication, an internal mechanism designed not merely to select a vendor, but to arrive at a decision of optimal value through a process of structured, evidence-based reasoning. The integrity of this system is paramount. A flawed evaluation process introduces significant organizational risk, exposing the firm to suboptimal partnerships, financial inefficiencies, and reputational damage.

The core challenge lies in constructing a framework that is resilient to the persistent and often subtle pressures of human cognitive bias and external influence. This requires moving the entire exercise from the realm of subjective comparison to one of disciplined, objective assessment.

The process cannot be viewed as a simple administrative task delegated to a procurement department. Instead, it must be understood as a critical function of strategic risk management. Every step, from the initial definition of requirements to the final contract award, represents a potential vulnerability. Cognitive shortcuts, such as affinity bias (favoring vendors who seem familiar) or the halo effect (allowing a positive impression in one area to influence the evaluation of another), can systematically distort outcomes.

A robust evaluation framework, therefore, is a form of [choice architecture](https://prime.greeks.live/area/choice-architecture/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). It is the deliberate structuring of the decision-making environment to guide evaluators toward the most rational and defensible conclusion, insulating the process from the predictable irrationalities of human judgment.

> The architecture of an RFP evaluation is the primary defense against entering into value-destructive partnerships.

![A precise mechanical interaction between structured components and a central dark blue element. This abstract representation signifies high-fidelity execution of institutional RFQ protocols for digital asset derivatives, optimizing price discovery and minimizing slippage within robust market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system-interface.jpg)

## Foundational Principles of an Objective Framework

At its heart, ensuring an unbiased evaluation is an engineering problem. It involves designing a system with clear inputs, a transparent processing mechanism, and a verifiable output. The quality of the output, the final selection, is wholly dependent on the integrity of the preceding stages. Three foundational principles underpin any such defensible system.

First, the criteria for judgment must be established and codified before any proposals are received. This pre-commitment to a defined set of metrics and their relative importance is the bedrock of objectivity. It prevents the criteria from being shifted, consciously or unconsciously, to fit a preferred vendor after the fact. Second, the system must enforce a separation of concerns, particularly between the assessment of qualitative merit and the consideration of price.

Research has conclusively demonstrated the existence of a “[lower bid bias](https://prime.greeks.live/area/lower-bid-bias/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite),” where knowledge of a low price systematically inflates the perceived quality of a proposal. A properly architected system quarantines the price variable until the technical and operational merits have been fully adjudicated. Third, the process must be auditable. Every score, every decision, and every communication must be documented, creating a clear and defensible record that demonstrates adherence to the established protocol. This transparency is the ultimate safeguard against challenges and ensures accountability within the organization.

![A sleek, circular, metallic-toned device features a central, highly reflective spherical element, symbolizing dynamic price discovery and implied volatility for Bitcoin options. This private quotation interface within a Prime RFQ platform enables high-fidelity execution of multi-leg spreads via RFQ protocols, minimizing information leakage and slippage](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-hub.jpg)

![Two sleek, pointed objects intersect centrally, forming an 'X' against a dual-tone black and teal background. This embodies the high-fidelity execution of institutional digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols, facilitating optimal price discovery and efficient cross-asset trading within a robust Prime RFQ, minimizing slippage and adverse selection](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-prime-os-microstructure.jpg)

## Strategy

![A sophisticated apparatus, potentially a price discovery or volatility surface calibration tool. A blue needle with sphere and clamp symbolizes high-fidelity execution pathways and RFQ protocol integration within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocol-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

## Designing the Evaluation Apparatus

The strategic design of an [RFP evaluation](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) system begins with the formation of the [evaluation committee](https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-committee/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). This is not an ad-hoc assembly but a deliberately constructed cross-functional body. Its composition should mirror the operational footprint of the intended solution. A committee composed of representatives from technology, finance, legal, and the primary business unit using the service ensures a holistic assessment.

Each member brings a distinct lens, mitigating the risk of any single perspective dominating the decision. The committee’s first act must be the ratification of an evaluation charter, a formal document that codifies the process, roles, responsibilities, and, most critically, the scoring framework. This charter serves as the constitution for the entire evaluation process.

A critical strategic decision is the implementation of blind or anonymized reviews, particularly for the initial stages of technical evaluation. This involves redacting vendor names and any identifying branding from the proposal documents before they are distributed to the evaluation team. This structural intervention directly attacks affinity bias and the halo effect, forcing evaluators to engage solely with the substance of the response.

While it requires an administrative overhead, the benefit in terms of sanitized, objective initial scoring is substantial. The process compels a focus on the “what” of the proposal, deferring the “who” to a later, more appropriate stage.

![A smooth, off-white sphere rests within a meticulously engineered digital asset derivatives RFQ platform, featuring distinct teal and dark blue metallic components. This sophisticated market microstructure enables private quotation, high-fidelity execution, and optimized price discovery for institutional block trades, ensuring capital efficiency and best execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-system-microstructure-core.jpg)

## The Scoring Matrix as a Strategic Instrument

The development of the [scoring matrix](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-simple-scoring-and-weighted-scoring-in-an-rfp-matrix/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is the most significant strategic activity in the pre-RFP phase. This is where the organization translates its abstract needs into a concrete, quantifiable model. The process begins with identifying the primary evaluation criteria, which typically fall into categories such as Technical Competence, Operational Capability, Financial Health, and Implementation Plan.

Each of these high-level criteria is then broken down into specific, measurable sub-factors. For instance, “Technical Competence” might be decomposed into “Adherence to specified standards,” “Scalability of the proposed architecture,” and “Demonstrated security protocols.”

The next step, weighting, is a profound strategic exercise. The committee must debate and assign a percentage weight to each criterion and sub-factor, reflecting its relative importance to the project’s success. Best practices suggest that price should not be weighted excessively; a range of 20-30% is often cited as a healthy benchmark to prevent the lower bid bias from overwhelming all other considerations of quality and long-term value.

These weights must be finalized and locked within the evaluation charter before the RFP is released. This pre-commitment is a powerful tool for enforcing discipline and preventing post-hoc justification of a favored outcome.

> A pre-defined and weighted scoring matrix transforms evaluation from a subjective art into a disciplined science.

The final element of the scoring instrument is the rating scale. A clearly defined scale, such as a 1-to-5 or 1-to-10 model, must be accompanied by explicit descriptions for each rating level. For example, a score of ‘5’ for a criterion might be defined as “Exceeds requirements; provides innovative approach with clear, demonstrable added value,” while a ‘3’ is “Meets all stated requirements,” and a ‘1’ is “Fails to meet critical requirements.” This level of definition reduces the “miscalibration” effect, where different evaluators apply the same numeric score with different meanings. 

![A polished, teal-hued digital asset derivative disc rests upon a robust, textured market infrastructure base, symbolizing high-fidelity execution and liquidity aggregation. Its reflective surface illustrates real-time price discovery and multi-leg options strategies, central to institutional RFQ protocols and principal trading frameworks](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-institutional-execution.jpg)

## Comparative Scoring Model Architectures

Organizations can adopt several models for structuring their scoring. The choice of model has significant implications for the final outcome. The most common is the [Weighted Scoring](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-simple-scoring-and-weighted-scoring-in-an-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) model, which provides a balanced and highly defensible approach.

However, other models exist for specific contexts. Understanding their mechanics is key to selecting the appropriate strategic tool.

| Scoring Model | Mechanism | Primary Advantage | Strategic Weakness |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Weighted Scoring | Assigns a specific weight to each evaluation criterion. A score is given for each criterion, multiplied by the weight, and summed to produce a total score. | Highly transparent, flexible, and forces a pre-commitment to organizational priorities. Creates a strong, auditable decision trail. | Requires significant upfront effort to define criteria and agree on weights. Can be complex to manage without dedicated tools. |
| Simple Scoring / Checklist | Evaluators use a simple scale (e.g. 1-5) for each question without applying differential weights. All criteria are treated as equally important. | Easy and fast to implement. Suitable for low-value, non-strategic procurements where all requirements are of similar importance. | Fails to differentiate between critical and minor requirements. A high score on a trivial point can offset a low score on a crucial one. |
| Pass/Fail Gating | Proposals must first meet a set of mandatory, non-negotiable requirements (the “gate”). Only those that pass are then subjected to a more detailed qualitative and quantitative evaluation. | Efficiently filters out non-compliant bids early in the process, saving evaluator time. Excellent for procurements with hard technical or legal constraints. | The binary nature of the gate can be too rigid, potentially eliminating a proposal with a minor, easily correctable non-compliance that is otherwise superior. |
| Two-Envelope System | Vendors submit two separate, sealed proposals ▴ one technical and one financial. The technical proposals are evaluated and scored first, without the committee having any knowledge of the pricing. The financial envelopes are only opened for those proposals that meet a minimum technical threshold. | The most effective structural defense against price-based bias. It forces a pure evaluation of quality and capability. | Can lengthen the evaluation timeline due to its sequential nature. Requires strict procedural controls to maintain the integrity of the two envelopes. |

![A split spherical mechanism reveals intricate internal components. This symbolizes an Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives Prime RFQ, enabling high-fidelity RFQ protocol execution, optimal price discovery, and atomic settlement for block trades and multi-leg spreads](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-revealing-rfq-execution-core-mechanics.jpg)

## Information Control and Communication Protocols

A disciplined communication strategy is essential to prevent bias from seeping into the evaluation process. The committee must designate a single point of contact (SPOC), typically the procurement lead, for all communications with vendors. This prevents back-channel conversations and ensures that all vendors receive the same information at the same time.

Any questions submitted by vendors and the corresponding answers must be anonymized and distributed to all participants. This maintains a level playing field.

Internally, the committee’s deliberations must be structured and confidential. Evaluators should be instructed to perform their initial scoring independently, without consulting one another. This prevents “groupthink” and ensures that a diversity of perspectives is captured in the initial data. Only after the independent scoring is complete should the committee convene for a consensus meeting.

This meeting is not for changing scores arbitrarily, but for discussing and understanding significant variances in the scores given by different evaluators. A facilitator should guide the discussion, focusing on the evidence within the proposals that led to the divergent scores. If an evaluator is persuaded by the evidence to change their score, they must document the specific reason for the change, maintaining the integrity of the audit trail.

![A dark, robust sphere anchors a precise, glowing teal and metallic mechanism with an upward-pointing spire. This symbolizes institutional digital asset derivatives execution, embodying RFQ protocol precision, liquidity aggregation, and high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-1.jpg)

![A beige, triangular device with a dark, reflective display and dual front apertures. This specialized hardware facilitates institutional RFQ protocols for digital asset derivatives, enabling high-fidelity execution, market microstructure analysis, optimal price discovery, capital efficiency, block trades, and portfolio margin](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-terminal-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-precise-market-microstructure-analysis.jpg)

## Execution

![Interconnected, precisely engineered modules, resembling Prime RFQ components, illustrate an RFQ protocol for digital asset derivatives. The diagonal conduit signifies atomic settlement within a dark pool environment, ensuring high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-protocol-engine.jpg)

## The Operational Playbook for Unbiased Adjudication

Executing an unbiased evaluation requires a rigorous, step-by-step protocol that leaves no room for ambiguity. This playbook operationalizes the strategy, transforming principles into a series of concrete actions. The process begins long before the RFP is issued and continues through to the final debrief. Each step is a critical link in the chain of objectivity.

- 
**Phase 1 ▴ Framework Construction (Pre-RFP)**

<li>**Establish the Evaluation Committee** ▴ Formally appoint a cross-functional team with a designated chair and a procurement lead (SPOC).

- **Draft and Ratify the Evaluation Charter** ▴ The committee collaborates to create a governing document that specifies the timeline, roles, communication protocols, scoring methodology, criteria, weights, and rating scale definitions. This document is signed off by all members and an executive sponsor.

- **Conduct Market Research** ▴ The team performs due diligence to understand the vendor landscape, which informs the development of realistic and comprehensive requirements.

- **Finalize the Scoring Matrix** ▴ This is the most critical output of Phase 1. The committee finalizes the detailed, [weighted scoring matrix](https://prime.greeks.live/area/weighted-scoring-matrix/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). This instrument is now locked and cannot be altered once the RFP is released.

</li>
- 
**Phase 2 ▴ Proposal Management and Initial Screening (Post-RFP Deadline)**

<li>**Centralized Receipt** ▴ All proposals are submitted to a single, secure digital portal or physical location managed by the SPOC. The time of receipt is logged automatically.

- **Compliance Check** ▴ The SPOC performs an initial administrative review to ensure proposals meet all mandatory submission requirements (e.g. format, deadlines, required forms). Non-compliant bids are documented and set aside.

- **Anonymization Protocol** ▴ For a blind review, the SPOC or a designated neutral administrator redacts all vendor-identifying information from the technical proposals, assigning a random code to each one. A master key linking codes to vendors is held securely by the SPOC.

- **Distribution** ▴ The anonymized technical proposals are distributed to the evaluation committee members.

</li>
- 
**Phase 3 ▴ Independent and Consensus Scoring**

<li>**Independent Evaluation** ▴ Each committee member individually evaluates and scores the anonymized proposals against the pre-defined scoring matrix. They must add comments and cite specific evidence from the proposal to justify each score. This work is completed without any discussion with other evaluators.

- **Score Collation** ▴ The SPOC collects all individual scorecards and compiles a master spreadsheet. This sheet calculates the average score for each criterion and highlights any significant variances in scores between evaluators for specific items.

- **Consensus Meeting** ▴ The committee convenes for a facilitated meeting. The focus is exclusively on the areas of high score variance. Evaluators explain the reasoning and evidence behind their scores. The goal is to reach a shared understanding, not to force agreement. An evaluator may choose to adjust their score based on the discussion, but must document the reason.

- **Final Technical Score** ▴ The individual scores (as amended during consensus) are finalized and averaged to create the final technical score for each proposal.

</li>
- 
**Phase 4 ▴ Price Evaluation and Final Selection**

<li>**Price Reveal** ▴ The SPOC now reveals the price proposals, but only for the vendors who have met a pre-determined minimum technical score threshold.

- **Price Scoring** ▴ The price scores are calculated using a pre-defined formula (e.g. lowest price gets maximum points, others are scored relative to the lowest).

- **Final Combined Score** ▴ The final technical and price scores are combined according to the weights established in the charter to produce a total score for each finalist.

- **Due Diligence** ▴ The committee conducts final due diligence on the top-scoring vendor(s), which may include reference checks, financial stability analysis, and finalist presentations.

- **Recommendation and Award** ▴ The committee makes its final recommendation to the executive sponsor, supported by the complete, documented scoring and evaluation record.

</li>

![Sleek, abstract system interface with glowing green lines symbolizing RFQ pathways and high-fidelity execution. This visualizes market microstructure for institutional digital asset derivatives, emphasizing private quotation and dark liquidity within a Prime RFQ framework, enabling best execution and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocol-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

## Quantitative Modeling in Practice a Granular Scoring Matrix

The heart of the execution phase is the quantitative scoring matrix. This tool translates qualitative assessments into numerical data that can be aggregated and compared objectively. A well-designed matrix is detailed, specific, and directly tied to the requirements outlined in the RFP. The following table provides a representative sample of a portion of such a matrix for the procurement of a new enterprise software system.

This is a very important part of the process. It demonstrates the level of granularity required for a robust and defensible evaluation.

| Category (Weight) | Criterion (Weight) | Evaluation Question | Rating Scale (1-5) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Technical Solution (40%) | Core Functionality (15%) | Does the solution meet all mandatory requirements (Section 3.1) and provide detailed explanations for how it addresses desirable features (Section 3.2)? | 1=Many gaps; 3=Meets all mandatory; 5=Exceeds all, with innovative approaches to desirable features. |
| Implementation & Support (30%) | Implementation Plan (20%) | Is the implementation plan detailed, realistic, and adequately resourced? Does it include a clear project management methodology and risk mitigation plan? | 1=Vague, unrealistic timeline; 3=Detailed and credible; 5=Excellent, includes value-add services like change management support. |
| Vendor Viability (10%) | Financial Stability & References (10%) | Does the vendor demonstrate strong financial health? Are client references relevant and positive? | 1=Concerns over financials or refs; 3=Acceptable financials and refs; 5=Strong financials, glowing and relevant references. |
| Pricing (20%) | Total Cost of Ownership (20%) | What is the total cost over five years, including licensing, implementation, training, and support? | Scored via formula after technical evaluation is complete. |

> The disciplined application of a quantitative scoring model is the mechanism that translates strategic intent into an impartial outcome.

![A precision metallic mechanism with radiating blades and blue accents, representing an institutional-grade Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives. It signifies high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols, leveraging dark liquidity and smart order routing within market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-engine.jpg)

## Managing Evaluator Psychology

Even with a perfect system, the human element remains a variable. The execution of an unbiased process requires active management of evaluator psychology. The procurement lead or committee chair plays a crucial role as a facilitator and process guardian. Before the evaluation begins, a formal training session should be held.

This session goes beyond simply explaining the scoring sheet. It should include a segment on common cognitive biases, providing concrete examples of how they can manifest in an RFP evaluation. Making evaluators aware of these subconscious tendencies is the first step in mitigating them. The training should also reinforce the importance of adhering strictly to the defined criteria and providing evidence-based justifications for every score.

During the consensus meeting, the facilitator’s role is to ensure a constructive and evidence-based dialogue. If a discussion veers into subjective territory (“I just have a good feeling about this vendor”) the facilitator must gently but firmly steer it back to the evidence presented in the proposals (“Let’s locate the specific section in their proposal that gives you that confidence”). This constant reinforcement of process discipline is mentally taxing but absolutely essential.

It is the human firewall that protects the integrity of the quantitative model. The entire system is designed to make the right choice the easiest and most logical choice, a core principle of effective choice architecture.

![Robust institutional-grade structures converge on a central, glowing bi-color orb. This visualizes an RFQ protocol's dynamic interface, representing the Principal's operational framework for high-fidelity execution and precise price discovery within digital asset market microstructure, enabling atomic settlement for block trades](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-prime-os-engine.jpg)

## References

- Chick, Gerard, and Robert Handfield. _The Procurement Value Proposition ▴ The Rise of Supply Management_. Kogan Page, 2015.

- Guth, Stephen. _Project Procurement Management ▴ A Guide to Structured Procurements_. Kogan Page, 2017.

- Mak, Jonathan. “Increased Transparency in Bases of Selection and Award Decisions.” _5th International Public Procurement Conference Proceedings_, 2012.

- Van Weele, Arjan J. and Frank Rozemeijer. _Procurement and Supply Chain Management_. Cengage Learning, 2020.

- Wang, Jingyan. “Understanding and Mitigating Biases in Evaluation.” PhD Thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, 2021.

- Schuh, Christian, et al. _The Purchasing Chessboard ▴ 64 Methods to Reduce Costs and Increase Value with Suppliers_. Springer, 2017.

- Zsidisin, George A. et al. _Strategic Sourcing ▴ Approaches for Managing Supply Chain Risk_. Springer, 2021.

- Benonisen, Monica, and Marianne Strand. “How Do Different Evaluation Methods Affect Outcomes in Procurement?” Master’s Thesis, Norwegian School of Economics, 2020.

- Flyvbjerg, Bent. “From Nobel Prize to Project Management ▴ Getting Risks Right.” _Project Management Journal_, vol. 37, no. 3, 2006, pp. 5-15.

- Bazerman, Max H. and Don A. Moore. _Judgment in Managerial Decision Making_. John Wiley & Sons, 2013.

![A sleek, bi-component digital asset derivatives engine reveals its intricate core, symbolizing an advanced RFQ protocol. This Prime RFQ component enables high-fidelity execution and optimal price discovery within complex market microstructure, managing latent liquidity for institutional operations](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimal-execution.jpg)

## Reflection

![A precision optical component stands on a dark, reflective surface, symbolizing a Price Discovery engine for Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives. This Crypto Derivatives OS element enables High-Fidelity Execution through advanced Algorithmic Trading and Multi-Leg Spread capabilities, optimizing Market Microstructure for RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-optimal-execution-system-microstructure.jpg)

## The Evaluation System as a Corporate Asset

An organization’s capacity to conduct an unbiased RFP evaluation is more than a procurement capability; it is a strategic asset. The framework detailed here ▴ the cross-functional committee, the pre-defined scoring matrix, the two-stage evaluation, the disciplined communication protocols ▴ is a system for converting information into high-quality capital allocation decisions. It is an operational expression of the organization’s commitment to fairness, transparency, and value creation. Viewing the process through this lens elevates it from a tactical necessity to a source of competitive advantage.

![A futuristic, metallic structure with reflective surfaces and a central optical mechanism, symbolizing a robust Prime RFQ for institutional digital asset derivatives. It enables high-fidelity execution of RFQ protocols, optimizing price discovery and liquidity aggregation across diverse liquidity pools with minimal slippage](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-platform-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-optimized-execution-management-system-with-robust-liquidity-sourcing.jpg)

## Calibrating Your Internal Compass

How does your own organization’s current process measure against this systemic view? Where are the points of friction or potential bias? Is the scoring matrix a tool of strategic intent, or a procedural afterthought? Is the evaluation committee a balanced council of experts, or a hastily assembled panel?

The answers to these questions reveal the robustness of your internal decision-making architecture. The goal is a state of operational resilience, where the process itself is the primary guarantor of a fair outcome, protecting the organization from both external pressures and its own inherent blind spots. This system becomes the corporate memory, ensuring that the lessons from one procurement cycle inform and strengthen the next.

![A sleek green probe, symbolizing a precise RFQ protocol, engages a dark, textured execution venue, representing a digital asset derivatives liquidity pool. This signifies institutional-grade price discovery and high-fidelity execution through an advanced Prime RFQ, minimizing slippage and optimizing capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-integration-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-institutional-liquidity-aggregation-on-prime-os.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/choice-architecture/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Sleek, intersecting planes, one teal, converge at a reflective central module. This visualizes an institutional digital asset derivatives Prime RFQ, enabling RFQ price discovery across liquidity pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimizing-institutional-liquidity-aggregation-and-best-execution.jpg)

## Choice Architecture

Meaning ▴ Choice Architecture systematically designs the context in which decisions are made, influencing user behavior toward predefined outcomes without removing ultimate agency. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/lower-bid-bias/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sophisticated dark-hued institutional-grade digital asset derivatives platform interface, featuring a glowing aperture symbolizing active RFQ price discovery and high-fidelity execution. The integrated intelligence layer facilitates atomic settlement and multi-leg spread processing, optimizing market microstructure for prime brokerage operations and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-crypto-derivatives-rfq-engine-intelligence-layer.jpg)

## Lower Bid Bias

Meaning ▴ Lower Bid Bias describes a market microstructure phenomenon where the effective bid price for an asset consistently resides at a level below its true intrinsic value or the prevailing mid-price, often due to factors such as market fragmentation, informational asymmetries, or structural inefficiencies in aggregated order books. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-committee/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, dark sphere, symbolizing the Intelligence Layer of a Prime RFQ, rests on a sophisticated institutional grade platform. Its surface displays volatility surface data, hinting at quantitative analysis for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-platform-intelligence-layer-optimizing-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Evaluation Committee

Meaning ▴ An Evaluation Committee constitutes a formally constituted internal governance body responsible for the systematic assessment of proposals, solutions, or counterparties, ensuring alignment with an institution's strategic objectives and operational parameters within the digital asset ecosystem. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A central precision-engineered RFQ engine orchestrates high-fidelity execution across interconnected market microstructure. This Prime RFQ node facilitates multi-leg spread pricing and liquidity aggregation for institutional digital asset derivatives, minimizing slippage](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/high-fidelity-rfq-execution-for-institutional-crypto-derivatives.jpg)

## Rfp Evaluation

Meaning ▴ RFP Evaluation denotes the structured, systematic process undertaken by an institutional entity to assess and score vendor proposals submitted in response to a Request for Proposal, specifically for technology and services pertaining to institutional digital asset derivatives. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-simple-scoring-and-weighted-scoring-in-an-rfp-matrix/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Intersecting translucent aqua blades, etched with algorithmic logic, symbolize multi-leg spread strategies and high-fidelity execution. Positioned over a reflective disk representing a deep liquidity pool, this illustrates advanced RFQ protocols driving precise price discovery within institutional digital asset derivatives market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-optimized-algorithmic-execution-microstructure-for-price-discovery.jpg)

## Scoring Matrix

Simple scoring treats all RFP criteria equally; weighted scoring applies strategic importance to each, creating a more intelligent evaluation system. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-simple-scoring-and-weighted-scoring-in-an-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, futuristic institutional-grade instrument, representing high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives. Its sharp point signifies price discovery via RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-rfq-execution-engine-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

## Weighted Scoring

Simple scoring offers operational ease; weighted scoring provides strategic precision by prioritizing key criteria. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/weighted-scoring-matrix/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, pointed object, merging light and dark modular components, embodies advanced market microstructure for digital asset derivatives. Its precise form represents high-fidelity execution, price discovery via RFQ protocols, emphasizing capital efficiency, institutional grade alpha generation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-digital-asset-rfq-execution-system-microstructure.jpg)

## Weighted Scoring Matrix

Meaning ▴ A Weighted Scoring Matrix is a computational framework designed to systematically evaluate and rank multiple alternatives or inputs by assigning numerical scores to predefined criteria, where each criterion is then weighted according to its determined relative significance, thereby yielding a composite quantitative assessment that facilitates comparative analysis and informed decision support within complex operational systems. </a>

**Tags:** [Lower Bid Bias](https://options.greeks.live/area/lower-bid-bias/), [RFP Evaluation](https://options.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation/), [Two-Envelope System](https://options.greeks.live/area/two-envelope-system/), [Choice Architecture](https://options.greeks.live/area/choice-architecture/), [Strategic Sourcing](https://options.greeks.live/area/strategic-sourcing/), [Procurement Risk Management](https://options.greeks.live/area/procurement-risk-management/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [How Can an Organization Mitigate Subjective Bias in the RFP Evaluation Process?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-mitigate-subjective-bias-in-the-rfp-evaluation-process/)
![A symmetrical, intricate digital asset derivatives execution engine. Its metallic and translucent elements visualize a robust RFQ protocol facilitating multi-leg spread execution. This system optimizes market microstructure and price discovery, ensuring high-fidelity execution and aggregated inquiry for capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-best-execution.jpg)

Mitigating RFP bias requires engineering a structured, multi-stage evaluation protocol with pre-defined, weighted criteria to ensure objective, data-driven decisions.

- 
### [How Can an Organization Effectively Train an Rfp Evaluation Committee to Reduce Subjectivity?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-effectively-train-an-rfp-evaluation-committee-to-reduce-subjectivity/)
![A meticulously engineered mechanism showcases a blue and grey striped block, representing a structured digital asset derivative, precisely engaged by a metallic tool. This setup illustrates high-fidelity execution within a controlled RFQ environment, optimizing block trade settlement and managing counterparty risk through robust market microstructure. It highlights a Prime RFQ intelligence layer.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution.jpg)

An organization trains its RFP committee by installing a structured, data-driven evaluation system to manage, not eliminate, human subjectivity.

- 
### [How Can Subjective Criteria like ‘Vendor Reputation’ Be Quantified in an RFP Evaluation?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-subjective-criteria-like-vendor-reputation-be-quantified-in-an-rfp-evaluation/)
![Precision instruments, resembling calibration tools, intersect over a central geared mechanism. This metaphor illustrates the intricate market microstructure and price discovery for institutional digital asset derivatives. It highlights the analytical rigor of RFQ protocols ensuring high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency across dark pools.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-engine-microstructure-analytics.jpg)

A structured evaluation model transforms vendor reputation from a subjective opinion into a quantifiable, data-driven asset for decision-making.

- 
### [What Are the Most Common Bottlenecks in an Rfp Evaluation Process?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-bottlenecks-in-an-rfp-evaluation-process/)
![A dark, reflective surface showcases a metallic bar, symbolizing market microstructure and RFQ protocol precision for block trade execution. A clear sphere, representing atomic settlement or implied volatility, rests upon it, set against a teal liquidity pool. This depicts institutional-grade digital asset derivatives trading with high-fidelity execution and prime brokerage oversight.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-execution-4.jpg)

The most common bottlenecks in an RFP evaluation process stem from a lack of clear requirements, poor communication, and manual processes.

- 
### [What Are the Most Common Pitfalls to Avoid When Forming an Rfp Evaluation Committee?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-pitfalls-to-avoid-when-forming-an-rfp-evaluation-committee/)
![A transparent glass sphere rests precisely on a metallic rod, connecting a grey structural element and a dark teal engineered module with a clear lens. This symbolizes atomic settlement of digital asset derivatives via private quotation within a Prime RFQ, showcasing high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency for RFQ protocols and liquidity aggregation.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/architecting-high-fidelity-execution-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-and-systemic-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

A defensible procurement decision originates from a committee architected for objectivity and procedural discipline.

- 
### [How Can You Prevent Personal Bias in the Rfp Scoring Process?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-you-prevent-personal-bias-in-the-rfp-scoring-process/)
![Precision-engineered institutional grade components, representing prime brokerage infrastructure, intersect via a translucent teal bar embodying a high-fidelity execution RFQ protocol. This depicts seamless liquidity aggregation and atomic settlement for digital asset derivatives, reflecting complex market microstructure and efficient price discovery.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-prime-os-core.jpg)

A resilient RFP scoring process neutralizes personal bias through a system of objective criteria, blind evaluation, and structured moderation.

- 
### [How Can an Organization Proactively Mitigate the Risk of Perceived Bias in Its RFP Evaluation Process?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-proactively-mitigate-the-risk-of-perceived-bias-in-its-rfp-evaluation-process/)
![A symmetrical, multi-faceted structure depicts an institutional Digital Asset Derivatives execution system. Its central crystalline core represents high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement. Distinct principal entities feature API integration points, symbolizing robust RFQ protocol connectivity for cross-asset liquidity aggregation and block trades.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-microstructure.jpg)

An organization mitigates RFP bias by engineering a transparent, data-driven evaluation system with objective, weighted criteria.

- 
### [What Are the Key Components of a Defensible RFP Evaluation Framework?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-components-of-a-defensible-rfp-evaluation-framework/)
![Stacked, distinct components, subtly tilted, symbolize the multi-tiered institutional digital asset derivatives architecture. Layers represent RFQ protocols, private quotation aggregation, core liquidity pools, and atomic settlement. This design optimizes market microstructure for high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/layered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-optimizing-principal-execution-management-systems-for-best-execution.jpg)

A defensible RFP evaluation framework is a structured, auditable system for objectively selecting the best-value vendor.

- 
### [How Can an Organization Ensure Consistency and Fairness among Multiple Evaluators in the Rfp Scoring Process?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-ensure-consistency-and-fairness-among-multiple-evaluators-in-the-rfp-scoring-process/)
![A complex, multi-layered electronic component with a central connector and fine metallic probes. This represents a critical Prime RFQ module for institutional digital asset derivatives trading, enabling high-fidelity execution of RFQ protocols, price discovery, and atomic settlement for multi-leg spreads with minimal latency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-engine-driving-best-execution-and-liquidity.jpg)

An organization ensures RFP evaluation integrity by architecting a calibrated system of weighted criteria, trained evaluators, and transparent governance protocols.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "How Can an Organization Ensure an Unbiased Evaluation of Rfp Responses?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-ensure-an-unbiased-evaluation-of-rfp-responses/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-ensure-an-unbiased-evaluation-of-rfp-responses/"
    },
    "headline": "How Can an Organization Ensure an Unbiased Evaluation of Rfp Responses? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "A resilient RFP evaluation system translates strategic priorities into a quantifiable, auditable, and unbiased selection process. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-ensure-an-unbiased-evaluation-of-rfp-responses/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-10T00:42:38+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-08-10T00:42:45+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-integration-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-institutional-liquidity-aggregation-on-prime-os.jpg",
        "caption": "An illuminated green probe, representing an advanced RFQ protocol, precisely engages a dark, textured surface, signifying a deep digital asset derivatives liquidity pool. This visualizes the seamless integration of a Principal's Prime RFQ for optimized trade lifecycle management. It underscores the critical process of high-fidelity execution, smart order routing, and best execution, enabling superior alpha generation while mitigating adverse selection and latency within complex market microstructure."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Auditable Decision Trail",
        "Choice Architecture",
        "Cognitive Bias Mitigation",
        "Evaluation Committee",
        "Lower Bid Bias",
        "Objective Vendor Selection",
        "Procurement Governance",
        "Procurement Risk Management",
        "RFP Evaluation",
        "RFP Evaluation Process",
        "Strategic Sourcing",
        "Supplier Selection",
        "Two-Envelope System",
        "Weighted Scoring Matrix"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-ensure-an-unbiased-evaluation-of-rfp-responses/
