# How Can an Organization Mitigate Evaluator Bias during the RFP Scoring Process? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-09
**Categories:** Question

---

![Precision-engineered multi-vane system with opaque, reflective, and translucent teal blades. This visualizes Institutional Grade Digital Asset Derivatives Market Microstructure, driving High-Fidelity Execution via RFQ protocols, optimizing Liquidity Pool aggregation, and Multi-Leg Spread management on a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-multi-vane-system-illustrating-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-market-microstructure-optimized-liquidity-aggregation-prime-os-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

![A sophisticated, symmetrical apparatus depicts an institutional-grade RFQ protocol hub for digital asset derivatives, where radiating panels symbolize liquidity aggregation across diverse market makers. Central beams illustrate real-time price discovery and high-fidelity execution of complex multi-leg spreads, ensuring atomic settlement within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-rfq-protocol-facilitating-atomic-settlement-and-high-fidelity-execution-of-multi-leg-spreads.jpg)

## Concept

![Metallic rods and translucent, layered panels against a dark backdrop. This abstract visualizes advanced RFQ protocols, enabling high-fidelity execution and price discovery across diverse liquidity pools for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-market-microstructure-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq.jpg)

## A Systems Approach to Objectivity

The request for proposal (RFP) process represents a critical juncture where an organization’s needs and the marketplace of solutions converge. The integrity of the final decision rests entirely on the objectivity of the evaluation. Yet, the process is inherently susceptible to human [cognitive biases](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-can-cognitive-biases-distort-opportunity-cost-calculations-in-practice/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), which introduce systemic errors into the evaluation. These are not character flaws but predictable patterns of judgment that can derail even the most well-intentioned procurement efforts.

An organization can mitigate these biases by treating the evaluation not as a simple matter of opinion gathering, but as a complex system to be architected. This requires designing a structured, data-centric framework that insulates the decision-making process from the subjective inclinations of individual evaluators.

At its core, [evaluator bias](https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluator-bias/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) manifests in several forms. The ‘[lower bid bias](https://prime.greeks.live/area/lower-bid-bias/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)’ systematically favors the cheapest proposal on qualitative measures once price is known. Confirmation bias leads evaluators to favor proposals that align with their pre-existing beliefs or relationships. The halo effect allows a positive impression in one area, such as a polished presentation, to disproportionately influence the assessment of other, unrelated criteria.

Addressing these requires a shift in perspective. The goal is to build a system where the evaluation is based solely on the factors and subfactors specified in the solicitation, as mandated by frameworks like the [Federal Acquisition Regulation](https://prime.greeks.live/area/federal-acquisition-regulation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (FAR). This system must prioritize procedural fairness, transparency, and the documented justification of every scoring decision.

> A well-designed evaluation system minimizes subjective inputs and maximizes the fidelity of objective data.

![A sleek, institutional grade apparatus, central to a Crypto Derivatives OS, showcases high-fidelity execution. Its RFQ protocol channels extend to a stylized liquidity pool, enabling price discovery across complex market microstructure for capital efficiency within a Principal's operational framework](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-rfq-digital-derivatives-prime-os-microstructure-optimization.jpg)

## The Fallacy of Unstructured Evaluation

Many organizations fall into the trap of using unstructured or overly simplistic scoring scales. Allowing evaluators to assign their own point values or using a narrow three-point scale introduces massive variance and fails to capture meaningful distinctions between proposals. A robust system, conversely, employs a more detailed and standardized scale, typically from five to ten points, to provide the necessary granularity for effective differentiation. The criteria themselves must be explicit and defined in advance of the call for proposals.

Vague standards like “excellence” or “merit” are invitations for bias to take root. The system’s architecture must instead rely on key qualification metrics that are unambiguous and directly relevant to the project’s objectives. By engineering the process with this level of precision from the outset, an organization moves from a subjective contest of perceptions to a disciplined analysis of capabilities.

![A sophisticated RFQ engine module, its spherical lens observing market microstructure and reflecting implied volatility. This Prime RFQ component ensures high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives, enabling private quotation for block trades](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-for-best-execution-protocol.jpg)

![Abstract geometric forms in blue and beige represent institutional liquidity pools and market segments. A metallic rod signifies RFQ protocol connectivity for atomic settlement of digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-market-microstructure-1.jpg)

## Strategy

![A transparent glass sphere rests precisely on a metallic rod, connecting a grey structural element and a dark teal engineered module with a clear lens. This symbolizes atomic settlement of digital asset derivatives via private quotation within a Prime RFQ, showcasing high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency for RFQ protocols and liquidity aggregation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/architecting-high-fidelity-execution-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-and-systemic-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## Designing the Evaluation Framework

A strategic approach to mitigating evaluator bias involves architecting a multi-stage, multi-layered process that controls the flow of information and structures the decision-making environment. This is not about removing human judgment, but about channeling it through a system designed for objectivity. The primary strategic pillars are the establishment of clear governance, the implementation of structured evaluation protocols, and the use of consensus-building mechanisms to resolve scoring discrepancies.

![A sleek, metallic multi-lens device with glowing blue apertures symbolizes an advanced RFQ protocol engine. Its precision optics enable real-time market microstructure analysis and high-fidelity execution, facilitating automated price discovery and aggregated inquiry within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-intelligence-layer.jpg)

## Governance and Committee Structure

The foundation of a fair process is a well-defined governance structure. This begins with the selection of the evaluation committee. Evaluators must be impartial, with no conflicts of interest or pre-existing relationships that could influence their ratings. It is a sound practice to have all potential evaluators attest to their impartiality and understanding of conflict-of-interest rules before the process begins.

For complex procurements, creating separate evaluation groups for technical/qualitative aspects and for pricing can be a powerful strategy. This [two-stage evaluation](https://prime.greeks.live/area/two-stage-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), where price is only revealed after the qualitative scoring is complete, directly counteracts the potent ‘lower bid bias’. The entire process should be managed by an impartial procurement professional who serves as the single point of contact for all communication with proposers, insulating the evaluators from direct influence.

> An effective strategy separates the evaluation of qualitative merit from the influence of price.

![Interlocking transparent and opaque components on a dark base embody a Crypto Derivatives OS facilitating institutional RFQ protocols. This visual metaphor highlights atomic settlement, capital efficiency, and high-fidelity execution within a prime brokerage ecosystem, optimizing market microstructure for block trade liquidity](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/modular-framework-for-crypto-derivatives-os-rfq-protocol-aggregation.jpg)

## Structured Evaluation Protocols

The core of the strategy lies in the design of the evaluation itself. This requires moving beyond simple score aggregation to a more nuanced system of assessment. The following protocols form the basis of a robust evaluation strategy:

- **Explicit Scoring Rubrics** ▴ Develop and distribute detailed scoring rubrics at the same time the RFP is issued. These rubrics must break down each evaluation criterion into specific, observable components. Instead of a single score for “Technical Approach,” the rubric should define multiple sub-criteria, each with a clear description of what constitutes a 1, 3, or 5 on the scale. This forces evaluators to justify [their scores](https://prime.greeks.live/question/why-do-dependency-based-anomaly-scores-provide-a-stronger-signal-for-financial-fraud-than-proximity-based-scores/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) based on specific evidence within the proposal. 

- **Weighted Criteria** ▴ Assign weights to each evaluation criterion before the RFP is released. This ensures that the scoring aligns with the organization’s priorities and prevents “criteria shifting,” where the importance of different factors changes after proposals have been reviewed. 

- **[Blind Evaluation](https://prime.greeks.live/area/blind-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)** ▴ Where feasible, proposals should be anonymized to remove identifying information about the bidders. This helps mitigate affinity bias, where evaluators might unconsciously favor well-known incumbents or companies with which they have a prior relationship. 

- **Mandatory Written Justifications** ▴ Require evaluators to provide a written rationale for every score they assign. This documentation is critical. It forces a deeper level of engagement with the proposal content and provides a clear record for auditing and for [consensus meetings](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-role-of-a-neutral-facilitator-in-overcoming-groupthink-during-rfp-consensus-meetings/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). 

![A multi-layered electronic system, centered on a precise circular module, visually embodies an institutional-grade Crypto Derivatives OS. It represents the intricate market microstructure enabling high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols for digital asset derivatives, driven by an intelligence layer facilitating algorithmic trading and optimal price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-facilitating-high-fidelity-execution-and-optimal-price-discovery.jpg)

## Consensus and Calibration

Discrepancies in scoring are inevitable, with studies showing a lack of consensus in over a third of RFP evaluations. A strategic framework anticipates this and includes a mechanism for resolution. After individual scoring is complete, an “[enhanced consensus scoring](https://prime.greeks.live/area/enhanced-consensus-scoring/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)” meeting should be held. The goal of this meeting is not to force all evaluators to agree, but to discuss the areas of significant score variance.

A facilitator can guide the conversation, focusing on the written justifications provided by each evaluator. This process allows team members to understand different perspectives, challenge potential biases, and adjust their scores based on a more complete understanding of the proposal and the criteria. This balances the need to reduce individual bias with the risk of introducing groupthink.

The following table outlines a comparison of a traditional, unstructured evaluation process versus a strategically architected one.

| Component | Traditional Process | Architected Process |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Scoring Criteria | Vague (e.g. “Merit,” “Quality”) | Explicit, pre-defined, and weighted criteria with detailed rubrics |
| Price Evaluation | Considered alongside qualitative factors | Two-stage review; price evaluated separately and after qualitative scoring |
| Evaluator Training | Minimal or non-existent | Mandatory briefing on goals, criteria, and cognitive biases |
| Score Discrepancies | Averaged or ignored | Addressed in structured consensus meetings with documented justifications |
| Documentation | Final scores only | Individual scores, written rationales for each score, and meeting minutes |

![Translucent circular elements represent distinct institutional liquidity pools and digital asset derivatives. A central arm signifies the Prime RFQ facilitating RFQ-driven price discovery, enabling high-fidelity execution via algorithmic trading, optimizing capital efficiency within complex market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-best-execution-framework.jpg)

![A sleek, modular institutional grade system with glowing teal conduits represents advanced RFQ protocol pathways. This illustrates high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives, facilitating private quotation and efficient liquidity aggregation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-ecosystem-powering-high-fidelity-rfq-execution-and-optimal-liquidity-discovery.jpg)

## Execution

![A multi-layered device with translucent aqua dome and blue ring, on black. This represents an Institutional-Grade Prime RFQ Intelligence Layer for Digital Asset Derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-intelligence-layer.jpg)

## An Operational Playbook for Bias Mitigation

Executing a bias-free evaluation requires a disciplined, step-by-step operational plan. This playbook translates the strategic framework into a series of concrete actions, transforming the [RFP scoring process](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-scoring-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) from a subjective exercise into a rigorous, auditable system of analysis. The focus is on procedural integrity, clear documentation, and the quantitative assessment of proposals.

![An angular, teal-tinted glass component precisely integrates into a metallic frame, signifying the Prime RFQ intelligence layer. This visualizes high-fidelity execution and price discovery for institutional digital asset derivatives, enabling volatility surface analysis and multi-leg spread optimization via RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocol-for-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

## Phase 1 ▴ Pre-Launch System Setup

The work begins long before any proposals are received. This phase is about building the infrastructure for an objective evaluation.

- **Establish the Evaluation Charter** ▴ Create a formal document that outlines the entire evaluation process. This charter should include the project goals, the full list of evaluation criteria and their weights, the scoring scale, the rules for communication, and the process for consensus meetings. All evaluators must review and sign this charter. 

- **Appoint an Impartial Administrator** ▴ Designate a procurement professional who is not an evaluator to manage the entire process. This individual is responsible for all communications with vendors, distributing proposals, and facilitating meetings. 

- **Develop the [Quantitative Scoring Matrix](https://prime.greeks.live/area/quantitative-scoring-matrix/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)** ▴ Build a detailed spreadsheet or use procurement software to house the scoring. This is more than a simple list of criteria; it is a granular matrix. Each primary criterion should be broken down into several subfactors. 

- **Conduct Evaluator Training** ▴ Hold a mandatory training session for all evaluators. This session should cover the project’s strategic goals, a deep dive into the evaluation charter and [scoring matrix](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-simple-scoring-and-weighted-scoring-in-an-rfp-matrix/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), and an explicit discussion of common cognitive biases (e.g. lower bid, confirmation, halo effect) and how the designed process helps to mitigate them. 

> A detailed scoring matrix is the foundational tool for converting qualitative assessments into quantitative data.

![A glowing blue module with a metallic core and extending probe is set into a pristine white surface. This symbolizes an active institutional RFQ protocol, enabling precise price discovery and high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocol-driving-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-high-fidelity-execution-precise-price-discovery-for-block-trades-and-capital-efficiency.jpg)

## Phase 2 ▴ The Evaluation Cycle

This phase focuses on the disciplined execution of the scoring process itself.

- **Anonymized Distribution** ▴ The administrator distributes the proposals to the evaluation team. If possible, vendor names and other identifying branding are redacted to facilitate a blind review. 

- **Independent Scoring Period** ▴ Evaluators are given a set period to conduct their reviews independently. They must enter a score for every subfactor and provide a corresponding written justification in the scoring matrix. Multitasking during review should be discouraged to ensure full focus. Communication between evaluators during this period is prohibited to prevent premature influence. 

- **Price Sequestration** ▴ The qualitative evaluation team completes and submits all their scores before the price proposals are revealed to them or evaluated by a separate committee. This is a critical control point. 

The following table provides an example of a weighted scoring matrix for a hypothetical software implementation RFP. Notice the granularity of the subfactors and the requirement for justification.

| Criterion (Weight) | Subfactor | Score (1-5) | Justification | Weighted Score |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Technical Solution (40%) | Core Functionality Alignment | 4 | Proposal meets 85% of mandatory functional requirements directly. | (4/5) 0.4 100 = 32 |
| Vendor Experience (30%) | Relevant Project History | 5 | Three case studies provided for similar-sized companies in our industry. | (5/5) 0.3 100 = 30 |

![A transparent sphere, bisected by dark rods, symbolizes an RFQ protocol's core. This represents multi-leg spread execution within a high-fidelity market microstructure for institutional grade digital asset derivatives, ensuring optimal price discovery and capital efficiency via Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Phase 3 ▴ Consensus and Final Decision

This final phase is about reconciling differences and making a defensible final decision.

The administrator first compiles all the scores and calculates the variance for each subfactor. A “variance threshold” (e.g. any difference of 2 or more points on the 5-point scale) should be established in the charter to flag items for discussion. The administrator then facilitates the consensus meeting, focusing only on the flagged items. Evaluators discuss their justifications, and afterward, are given the opportunity to revise their scores.

They are not forced to reach a perfect consensus. The final scores are then calculated, the price evaluation is incorporated, and a winning vendor is selected. Comprehensive debriefings should be offered to unsuccessful proposers to improve transparency and maintain good vendor relationships.

![An intricate, high-precision mechanism symbolizes an Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives RFQ protocol. Its sleek off-white casing protects the core market microstructure, while the teal-edged component signifies high-fidelity execution and optimal price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-market-microstructure-optimization.jpg)

## References

- Shalev, Moshe, and Jonathan B. G. Pinto. “The ‘Lower Bid Bias’ ▴ A Systematic Bias in Evaluating Qualitative Factors in Public Tenders.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, vol. 26, no. 3, 2016, pp. 545-558.

- Gleb, Tsipursky. “Prevent Costly Procurement Disasters ▴ 6 Science-Backed Techniques For Bias-Free Decision Making.” Forbes, 27 Mar. 2023.

- “Managing internal nomination and peer review processes to reduce bias.” University of Michigan Office of the Vice President for Research, 2022.

- “Proposal Evaluation Tips & Tricks ▴ How to Select the Best Vendor for the Job.” Procurement Excellence Network, Government Finance Officers Association.

- “Mitigating Cognitive Bias in Proposal Evaluation.” National Contract Management Association, 2021.

- Bazerman, Max H. and Don A. Moore. Judgment in Managerial Decision Making. John Wiley & Sons, 2017.

- Kahneman, Daniel. Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011.

- D’Avanzo, R. & Valdani, E. “The role of cognitive biases in the evaluation of public procurement tenders.” Journal of Public Procurement, vol. 19, no. 1, 2019, pp. 1-22.

![A dynamic visual representation of an institutional trading system, featuring a central liquidity aggregation engine emitting a controlled order flow through dedicated market infrastructure. This illustrates high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives, optimizing price discovery within a private quotation environment for block trades, ensuring capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-os-driving-high-fidelity-execution-for-digital-asset-derivatives-through-optimized-rfq-protocols-and-smart-order-routing.jpg)

## Reflection

![A central, metallic hub anchors four symmetrical radiating arms, two with vibrant, textured teal illumination. This depicts a Principal's high-fidelity execution engine, facilitating private quotation and aggregated inquiry for institutional digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols, optimizing market microstructure and deep liquidity pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-brokerage-digital-asset-rfq-execution-engine-microstructure.jpg)

## The Evaluation System as a Living Process

The mitigation of bias in the RFP process is not a static achievement reached by implementing a one-time checklist. It is the establishment of a dynamic system, an operational framework that requires continuous monitoring, calibration, and refinement. The principles of structured evaluation, informational control, and documented justification form the core of this system. Viewing your organization’s procurement activities through this systemic lens transforms the objective from simply ‘picking a vendor’ to ‘engineering a high-fidelity decision’.

Each RFP cycle generates a wealth of data, not just about the vendors, but about the effectiveness of the evaluation system itself. Analyzing scoring variances, the outcomes of consensus meetings, and the performance of selected vendors provides the feedback loop necessary for iterative improvement. Does a particular criterion consistently produce high levels of disagreement? Perhaps it is too vaguely defined.

Does the weighting accurately reflect the post-contract realities of what drives project success? The answers to these questions allow for the refinement of the system’s architecture over time. The ultimate goal is to build an organizational capability for making consistently superior procurement decisions, turning a mandatory process into a source of sustained strategic advantage.

![Smooth, reflective, layered abstract shapes on dark background represent institutional digital asset derivatives market microstructure. This depicts RFQ protocols, facilitating liquidity aggregation, high-fidelity execution for multi-leg spreads, price discovery, and Principal's operational framework efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-multi-leg-spreads.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-can-cognitive-biases-distort-opportunity-cost-calculations-in-practice/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract spheres and linear conduits depict an institutional digital asset derivatives platform. The central glowing network symbolizes RFQ protocol orchestration, price discovery, and high-fidelity execution across market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-high-fidelity-execution-4.jpg)

## Cognitive Biases

Cognitive biases systematically distort opportunity cost calculations by warping the perception of risk and reward. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluator-bias/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract RFQ engine, transparent blades symbolize multi-leg spread execution and high-fidelity price discovery. The central hub aggregates deep liquidity pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-rfq-engine-for-crypto-derivatives-high-fidelity-block-trade.jpg)

## Evaluator Bias

Meaning ▴ Evaluator bias refers to the systematic deviation from objective valuation or risk assessment, originating from subjective human judgment, inherent model limitations, or miscalibrated parameters within automated systems. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/lower-bid-bias/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Stacked, multi-colored discs symbolize an institutional RFQ Protocol's layered architecture for Digital Asset Derivatives. This embodies a Prime RFQ enabling high-fidelity execution across diverse liquidity pools, optimizing multi-leg spread trading and capital efficiency within complex market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-stack-for-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Lower Bid Bias

Meaning ▴ Lower Bid Bias describes a market microstructure phenomenon where the effective bid price for an asset consistently resides at a level below its true intrinsic value or the prevailing mid-price, often due to factors such as market fragmentation, informational asymmetries, or structural inefficiencies in aggregated order books. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/federal-acquisition-regulation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Beige module, dark data strip, teal reel, clear processing component. This illustrates an RFQ protocol's high-fidelity execution, facilitating principal-to-principal atomic settlement in market microstructure, essential for a Crypto Derivatives OS](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-crypto-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine.jpg)

## Federal Acquisition Regulation

Meaning ▴ The Federal Acquisition Regulation, or FAR, constitutes the principal set of rules governing the acquisition process for all executive agencies of the United States federal government. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/two-stage-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![An abstract composition featuring two intersecting, elongated objects, beige and teal, against a dark backdrop with a subtle grey circular element. This visualizes RFQ Price Discovery and High-Fidelity Execution for Multi-Leg Spread Block Trades within a Prime Brokerage Crypto Derivatives OS for Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-options-rfq-for-multi-leg-spreads-price-discovery.jpg)

## Two-Stage Evaluation

Meaning ▴ Two-Stage Evaluation refers to a structured analytical process designed to optimize resource allocation by applying sequential filters to a dataset or set of opportunities. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/why-do-dependency-based-anomaly-scores-provide-a-stronger-signal-for-financial-fraud-than-proximity-based-scores/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Two sleek, pointed objects intersect centrally, forming an 'X' against a dual-tone black and teal background. This embodies the high-fidelity execution of institutional digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols, facilitating optimal price discovery and efficient cross-asset trading within a robust Prime RFQ, minimizing slippage and adverse selection](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-prime-os-microstructure.jpg)

## Their Scores

Dependency-based scores provide a stronger signal by modeling the logical relationships between entities, detecting systemic fraud that proximity models miss. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/blind-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![An abstract, angular sculpture with reflective blades from a polished central hub atop a dark base. This embodies institutional digital asset derivatives trading, illustrating market microstructure, multi-leg spread execution, and high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-price-discovery-system.jpg)

## Blind Evaluation

Meaning ▴ Blind Evaluation defines a pre-trade process where a liquidity provider or market maker generates a firm, two-sided price quote for a financial instrument, typically a digital asset derivative, without prior knowledge of the initiator's desired trade direction or specific quantity beyond a defined range. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-role-of-a-neutral-facilitator-in-overcoming-groupthink-during-rfp-consensus-meetings/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Sleek, futuristic metallic components showcase a dark, reflective dome encircled by a textured ring, representing a Volatility Surface for Digital Asset Derivatives. This Prime RFQ architecture enables High-Fidelity Execution and Private Quotation via RFQ Protocols for Block Trade liquidity](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/advanced-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-platform-architecture-for-high-fidelity-rfq-protocol-execution-and-price-discovery.jpg)

## Consensus Meetings

A neutral facilitator is a process architect who enforces objectivity to debug groupthink in high-stakes RFP decisions. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/enhanced-consensus-scoring/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![An advanced RFQ protocol engine core, showcasing robust Prime Brokerage infrastructure. Intricate polished components facilitate high-fidelity execution and price discovery for institutional grade digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-core-for-precision-trading.jpg)

## Enhanced Consensus Scoring

Meaning ▴ Enhanced Consensus Scoring defines a sophisticated algorithmic framework engineered to synthesize disparate, real-time data inputs into a singular, highly reliable metric or score, specifically for assessing the quality and integrity of critical market parameters or counterparty metrics within the institutional digital asset derivatives ecosystem. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-scoring-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Modular circuit panels, two with teal traces, converge around a central metallic anchor. This symbolizes core architecture for institutional digital asset derivatives, representing a Principal's Prime RFQ framework, enabling high-fidelity execution and RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-prime-os.jpg)

## Rfp Scoring Process

Meaning ▴ The RFP Scoring Process is a formalized, structured methodology for quantitatively evaluating vendor responses to a Request for Proposal, specifically designed to assess the suitability of technology and service providers for institutional digital asset derivative platforms and related infrastructure. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/quantitative-scoring-matrix/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, black and beige institutional-grade device, featuring a prominent optical lens for real-time market microstructure analysis and an open modular port. This RFQ protocol engine facilitates high-fidelity execution of multi-leg spreads, optimizing price discovery for digital asset derivatives and accessing latent liquidity](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-for-high-fidelity-price-discovery-and-latent-liquidity-aggregation-across-multi-leg-spreads.jpg)

## Quantitative Scoring Matrix

Meaning ▴ A Quantitative Scoring Matrix is a formalized analytical framework designed to objectively evaluate complex entities or scenarios by assigning numerical scores across a predefined set of weighted criteria, culminating in a composite metric that facilitates data-driven decision-making within institutional contexts. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-simple-scoring-and-weighted-scoring-in-an-rfp-matrix/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Interconnected translucent rings with glowing internal mechanisms symbolize an RFQ protocol engine. This Principal's Operational Framework ensures High-Fidelity Execution and precise Price Discovery for Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives, optimizing Market Microstructure and Capital Efficiency via Atomic Settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Scoring Matrix

Simple scoring treats all RFP criteria equally; weighted scoring applies strategic importance to each, creating a more intelligent evaluation system. </a>

**Tags:** [Blind Evaluation](https://options.greeks.live/area/blind-evaluation/), [Procurement Excellence](https://options.greeks.live/area/procurement-excellence/), [Objective Evaluation Criteria](https://options.greeks.live/area/objective-evaluation-criteria/), [Enhanced Consensus Scoring](https://options.greeks.live/area/enhanced-consensus-scoring/), [Federal Acquisition Regulation](https://options.greeks.live/area/federal-acquisition-regulation/), [RFP Scoring Process](https://options.greeks.live/area/rfp-scoring-process/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [How Do You Mitigate Evaluator Bias in an Rfp Scoring Process?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-mitigate-evaluator-bias-in-an-rfp-scoring-process/)
![A sleek, metallic module with a dark, reflective sphere sits atop a cylindrical base, symbolizing an institutional-grade Crypto Derivatives OS. This system processes aggregated inquiries for RFQ protocols, enabling high-fidelity execution of multi-leg spreads while managing gamma exposure and slippage within dark pools.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-trading-crypto-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-system.jpg)

Mitigating RFP evaluator bias requires architecting a system of blind scoring, weighted rubrics, and procedural governance.

- 
### [What Are the Best Practices for Structuring an RFP Evaluation Committee to Ensure Impartiality?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-best-practices-for-structuring-an-rfp-evaluation-committee-to-ensure-impartiality/)
![A central teal sphere, secured by four metallic arms on a circular base, symbolizes an RFQ protocol for institutional digital asset derivatives. It represents a controlled liquidity pool within market microstructure, enabling high-fidelity execution of block trades and managing counterparty risk through a Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-hub-1.jpg)

A meticulously structured RFP evaluation committee is a risk mitigation system that converts subjective inputs into a defensible, objective decision.

- 
### [How Does Groupthink Manifest in an Rfp Evaluation Committee and What Are the Strategies to Counter It?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-groupthink-manifest-in-an-rfp-evaluation-committee-and-what-are-the-strategies-to-counter-it/)
![Abstract geometric design illustrating a central RFQ aggregation hub for institutional digital asset derivatives. Radiating lines symbolize high-fidelity execution via smart order routing across dark pools. Modular elements represent atomic settlement and capital efficiency within a Principal's operational framework.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-high-fidelity-execution-architecture.jpg)

Groupthink in an RFP committee is a systemic failure of critical analysis; it is countered by architecting a decision process with protocols for dissent.

- 
### [What Is the Best Way to Determine If an Rfp Change Is Material Enough to Require a Deadline Extension?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-best-way-to-determine-if-an-rfp-change-is-material-enough-to-require-a-deadline-extension/)
![A translucent sphere with intricate metallic rings, an 'intelligence layer' core, is bisected by a sleek, reflective blade. This visual embodies an 'institutional grade' 'Prime RFQ' enabling 'high-fidelity execution' of 'digital asset derivatives' via 'private quotation' and 'RFQ protocols', optimizing 'capital efficiency' and 'market microstructure' for 'block trade' operations.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-rfq-engine-for-digital-asset-derivatives-best-execution.jpg)

A material RFP change, which alters a bid's core scope, cost, or risk, requires a deadline extension to ensure fair competition.

- 
### [What Are the Most Critical Components of a Legally Defensible Rfp Scoring Rubric?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-critical-components-of-a-legally-defensible-rfp-scoring-rubric/)
![Internal hard drive mechanics, with a read/write head poised over a data platter, symbolize the precise, low-latency execution and high-fidelity data access vital for institutional digital asset derivatives. This embodies a Principal OS architecture supporting robust RFQ protocols, enabling atomic settlement and optimized liquidity aggregation within complex market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-precision-execution-system-microstructure.jpg)

A legally defensible RFP scoring rubric is a risk management system that translates priorities into an objective, auditable framework.

- 
### [What Are the Most Common Cognitive Biases That Affect Rfp Evaluation Processes?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-cognitive-biases-that-affect-rfp-evaluation-processes/)
![A reflective digital asset pipeline bisects a dynamic gradient, symbolizing high-fidelity RFQ execution across fragmented market microstructure. Concentric rings denote the Prime RFQ centralizing liquidity aggregation for institutional digital asset derivatives, ensuring atomic settlement and managing counterparty risk.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-rfq-execution-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-2.jpg)

Cognitive biases are systemic flaws in human judgment that can be mitigated through a robust, data-driven RFP evaluation architecture.

- 
### [What Are the Most Common Pitfalls in an Rfp Consensus Meeting without a Facilitator?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-pitfalls-in-an-rfp-consensus-meeting-without-a-facilitator/)
![A disaggregated institutional-grade digital asset derivatives module, off-white and grey, features a precise brass-ringed aperture. It visualizes an RFQ protocol interface, enabling high-fidelity execution, managing counterparty risk, and optimizing price discovery within market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-modular-execution-intelligence-system.jpg)

An RFP consensus meeting without a facilitator is a high-risk system operating without protocols, leading to suboptimal capital allocation.

- 
### [What Are the Best Practices for Mitigating Evaluator Bias in a Qualitative RFP Assessment?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-best-practices-for-mitigating-evaluator-bias-in-a-qualitative-rfp-assessment/)
![Abstract geometric planes in teal, navy, and grey intersect. A central beige object, symbolizing a precise RFQ inquiry, passes through a teal anchor, representing High-Fidelity Execution within Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives. This depicts optimal Price Discovery and Liquidity Aggregation.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/rfq-protocols-for-digital-asset-derivatives-high-fidelity-execution-liquidity-aggregation-price-discovery-market-microstructure.jpg)

A structured, multi-phase protocol that deconstructs, quantifies, and blinds the evaluation is essential to mitigate cognitive bias.

- 
### [How Do You Effectively Mitigate Cognitive Biases within an Rfp Evaluation Committee?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-effectively-mitigate-cognitive-biases-within-an-rfp-evaluation-committee/)
![Intersecting teal and dark blue planes, with reflective metallic lines, depict structured pathways for institutional digital asset derivatives trading. This symbolizes high-fidelity execution, RFQ protocol orchestration, and multi-venue liquidity aggregation within a Prime RFQ, reflecting precise market microstructure and optimal price discovery.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-rfq-execution-liquidity-microstructure.jpg)

A structured, multi-stage evaluation process neutralizes inherent biases, ensuring decisions are based on evidence, not intuition.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "How Can an Organization Mitigate Evaluator Bias during the RFP Scoring Process?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-mitigate-evaluator-bias-during-the-rfp-scoring-process/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-mitigate-evaluator-bias-during-the-rfp-scoring-process/"
    },
    "headline": "How Can an Organization Mitigate Evaluator Bias during the RFP Scoring Process? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "Architecting a multi-stage evaluation with weighted, justified scoring and price sequestration mitigates bias for defensible decisions. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-mitigate-evaluator-bias-during-the-rfp-scoring-process/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-09T19:24:07+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-08-09T19:24:12+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-rfq-protocol-intelligence-layer-for-digital-asset-derivatives-microstructure.jpg",
        "caption": "A sophisticated, multi-component system module, predominantly dark blue with a beige element, features a precision cylindrical sensor with a central lens. This critical institutional-grade Prime RFQ component enables advanced algorithmic trading, minimizing slippage and information leakage during block trade execution. It facilitates optimal price discovery across diverse liquidity pools, supporting multi-leg spread strategies and robust portfolio margin management for crypto derivatives, ensuring atomic settlement and best execution via an Execution Management System."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Blind Evaluation",
        "Cognitive Bias Mitigation",
        "Enhanced Consensus Scoring",
        "Evaluator Bias",
        "Federal Acquisition Regulation",
        "Lower Bid Bias",
        "Objective Evaluation Criteria",
        "Procurement Excellence",
        "Procurement Governance",
        "Quantitative Scoring Matrix",
        "RFP Scoring Process",
        "Two-Stage Evaluation"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-mitigate-evaluator-bias-during-the-rfp-scoring-process/
