# How Can an Organization Prevent Price from Dominating an RFP Evaluation? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-08
**Categories:** Question

---

![Precision-engineered multi-vane system with opaque, reflective, and translucent teal blades. This visualizes Institutional Grade Digital Asset Derivatives Market Microstructure, driving High-Fidelity Execution via RFQ protocols, optimizing Liquidity Pool aggregation, and Multi-Leg Spread management on a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-multi-vane-system-illustrating-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-market-microstructure-optimized-liquidity-aggregation-prime-os-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

![Precision-engineered modular components display a central control, data input panel, and numerical values on cylindrical elements. This signifies an institutional Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives, enabling RFQ protocol aggregation, high-fidelity execution, algorithmic price discovery, and volatility surface calibration for portfolio margin](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/firm-fx-options-rfq-trade-system-key-microstructure-data-flow-core-engine.jpg)

## Concept

![A sleek, multi-component system, predominantly dark blue, features a cylindrical sensor with a central lens. This precision-engineered module embodies an intelligence layer for real-time market microstructure observation, facilitating high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocol](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-rfq-protocol-intelligence-layer-for-digital-asset-derivatives-microstructure.jpg)

## The RFP as a System for Strategic Alignment

The gravitational pull of the price column in a proposal spreadsheet is a familiar force, one that can warp an entire [strategic sourcing](https://prime.greeks.live/area/strategic-sourcing/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) initiative into a simple exercise in cost minimization. An organization seeking to acquire a new capability, whether a software platform, a professional service, or a complex piece of machinery, engages in a Request for Proposal (RFP) process. This undertaking is fundamentally an information discovery protocol.

Its primary function is the systematic identification of an external partner whose capabilities, operational DNA, and strategic trajectory align most precisely with the acquiring organization’s long-term objectives. Viewing the [RFP evaluation](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) as a system, rather than an event, shifts the entire dynamic from procurement to strategic acquisition.

This systemic view recasts the evaluation framework. It becomes a diagnostic tool designed to measure multiple dimensions of value. Price is one such dimension, an important but ultimately incomplete data point. A truly robust evaluation system quantifies a spectrum of factors, including [technical merit](https://prime.greeks.live/area/technical-merit/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), implementation fidelity, operational risk, lifecycle support, and the vendor’s own financial and organizational stability.

Each of these components represents a potential source of value or a vector of risk. A low price coupled with high integration risk or poor lifecycle support introduces a hidden liability, a form of organizational debt that will come due long after the initial contract is signed. The system’s purpose, therefore, is to make these hidden liabilities visible and quantifiable from the outset.

> A well-designed RFP evaluation system functions as a strategic filter, qualifying partners on holistic value before considering price.

The architecture of this system begins with a clear articulation of the desired outcome. What specific business capability is being sought? How does this capability support a larger strategic goal? How will its performance be measured over a three- to five-year horizon?

Answering these questions provides the foundational logic for the [evaluation criteria](https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-criteria/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). Without this initial step, price invariably fills the strategic vacuum, becoming the de facto measure of success because no other clear measure has been defined. The process of preventing price dominance is therefore an act of deliberate system design, initiated long before the first proposal is received. It is about building a framework that defines value so clearly that price is naturally contextualized as just one component of a much larger equation.

![A layered, cream and dark blue structure with a transparent angular screen. This abstract visual embodies an institutional-grade Prime RFQ for high-fidelity RFQ execution, enabling deep liquidity aggregation and real-time risk management for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-layered-structure-for-institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution.jpg)

## Deconstructing Value beyond the Financial Bid

To move beyond a price-centric evaluation, an organization must first define what constitutes value in the specific context of the acquisition. This definition must be multidimensional and aligned with the strategic intent behind the RFP. The components of this value equation can be grouped into several core domains, each representing a critical axis of performance and risk.

- 
**Technical and Functional Merit** ▴ This domain assesses the core capabilities of the proposed solution. It measures how effectively the offering meets the specified functional requirements, its underlying technical architecture, its scalability, and its interoperability with existing systems. A high score in this area indicates a solution that is fit for purpose and technologically sound, reducing the risk of performance gaps and costly re-engineering efforts down the line.

- 
**Operational and Implementation Viability** ▴ A brilliant solution that cannot be implemented effectively delivers no value. This component evaluates the vendor’s proposed implementation plan, the experience and expertise of their delivery team, the quality of their training and change management support, and their track record of successful deployments in similar environments. It is a measure of the vendor’s ability to translate their proposal into a functioning reality within the client’s organization.

- 
**Lifecycle and Support Framework** ▴ The acquisition of a significant capability is the beginning of a long-term relationship. This domain scrutinizes the vendor’s support model, service level agreements (SLAs), commitment to future product development, and overall customer success philosophy. Strong performance here signals a partner committed to delivering value over the entire lifecycle of the solution, mitigating the risk of technological obsolescence and poor post-implementation support.

- 
**Partner and [Strategic Alignment](https://prime.greeks.live/area/strategic-alignment/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)** ▴ This component assesses factors related to the vendor as a business partner. It includes their financial stability, market reputation, customer references, and cultural fit with the acquiring organization. A financially stable partner with a strong reputation and aligned values is less likely to be acquired, pivot its business model, or fail to deliver on long-term commitments, reducing a significant source of strategic risk.

By disaggregating “value” into these constituent parts, an organization creates a structured, defensible logic for its decision-making process. Each domain can be broken down further into specific, measurable criteria. This granular approach provides the necessary vocabulary and analytical framework to conduct a nuanced evaluation, ensuring that the conversation among stakeholders is focused on a holistic assessment of capability and risk, with price being just one of the many factors under consideration.

![Smooth, glossy, multi-colored discs stack irregularly, topped by a dome. This embodies institutional digital asset derivatives market microstructure, with RFQ protocols facilitating aggregated inquiry for multi-leg spread execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-for-prime-os-best-execution.jpg)

![Luminous, multi-bladed central mechanism with concentric rings. This depicts RFQ orchestration for institutional digital asset derivatives, enabling high-fidelity execution and optimized price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/optimized-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine.jpg)

## Strategy

![Overlapping dark surfaces represent interconnected RFQ protocols and institutional liquidity pools. A central intelligence layer enables high-fidelity execution and precise price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-multi-leg-spread-high-fidelity-execution-market-microstructure-prime-os-system.jpg)

## The Multi-Criteria Evaluation Framework

The core strategy for subordinating price within an RFP evaluation is the implementation of a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) framework. This approach codifies the value domains discussed previously into a structured, quantitative scoring model. The power of this system lies in its ability to translate subjective assessments into objective data points, creating a composite picture of a vendor’s proposal that reflects the organization’s strategic priorities.

The foundation of this strategy is the explicit and transparent weighting of evaluation criteria before the RFP is even issued. This act of pre-commitment forces stakeholders to engage in a crucial conversation about what truly matters, forging a consensus on the definition of success.

Assigning weights to criteria is a declaration of strategic intent. An organization might determine that for a mission-critical software implementation, the ‘Technical and Functional Merit’ carries a weight of 40%, ‘Operational Viability’ 25%, ‘Lifecycle Support’ 20%, and ‘Price’ a deliberately constrained 15%. This weighting scheme sends an unambiguous signal to both internal evaluators and external bidders ▴ the quality of the solution and the ability to successfully implement and support it are overwhelmingly more important than the initial cost.

The price is not ignored; it is simply contextualized. It becomes a tie-breaking factor among otherwise superior proposals, or a disqualifying factor if it is prohibitively high, but it does not lead the decision.

![A precision internal mechanism for 'Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives' 'Prime RFQ'. White casing holds dark blue 'algorithmic trading' logic and a teal 'multi-leg spread' module](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-engine-high-fidelity-execution-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## The Two-Envelope Protocol

A powerful tactical execution of the MCDM strategy is the “two-envelope” or two-stage evaluation process. This protocol creates a procedural firewall between the assessment of a proposal’s quality and the consideration of its cost. Vendors are required to submit their technical and financial proposals in separate, sealed “envelopes” (whether physical or digital).

The [evaluation committee](https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-committee/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) first opens and scores only the technical proposals against the pre-defined, weighted criteria. This stage is conducted in isolation, free from the cognitive bias that knowledge of the price can introduce.

A critical rule is established ▴ only the proposals that meet a minimum technical threshold (e.g. 75% of the maximum possible non-price score) will advance to the second stage. Proposals that fail to meet this quality bar are eliminated from consideration, regardless of their price. This mechanism ensures that the organization does not waste time considering low-cost, low-quality bids that are incapable of meeting its strategic needs.

After the qualifying technical scores are finalized and documented, the financial envelopes for the successful bidders are opened. The price scores are then calculated and combined with the technical scores to determine the final ranking. This procedural separation enforces a “quality-first” evaluation sequence, making it structurally impossible for price to be the primary decision driver.

- 
**Establishment of Criteria and Thresholds** ▴ Before the RFP is released, the evaluation committee agrees upon all non-price criteria, their respective weights, and the minimum technical score required to pass to the next stage.

- 
**Segregated Proposal Submission** ▴ Vendors submit two distinct packages ▴ one containing all information related to the technical, functional, and operational aspects of their proposal, and a second containing only pricing information.

- 
**Stage One Technical Evaluation** ▴ The committee convenes to open and score only the technical proposals. All discussion and scoring are confined to the merits of the solution against the weighted criteria. The financial proposals remain sealed.

- 
**Application of the Quality Threshold** ▴ Once scoring is complete, the technical scores are tallied. Any proposal that fails to meet the pre-defined minimum technical threshold is formally rejected and removed from the process.

- 
**Stage Two Financial Evaluation** ▴ For the proposals that have passed the technical threshold, the financial envelopes are opened. The price is then scored, typically on a straightforward scale where the lowest price receives the maximum points for that category.

- 
**Final Score Aggregation** ▴ The technical and financial scores are combined according to their pre-assigned weights to produce a final, holistic score for each qualified vendor, identifying the proposal that offers the best overall value.

![A central RFQ aggregation engine radiates segments, symbolizing distinct liquidity pools and market makers. This depicts multi-dealer RFQ protocol orchestration for high-fidelity price discovery in digital asset derivatives, highlighting diverse counterparty risk profiles and algorithmic pricing grids](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/centralized-digital-asset-rfq-orchestration-for-multi-venue-liquidity-aggregation-and-high-fidelity-execution-across-diverse-counterparties.jpg)

## Total Value of Ownership as a Guiding Principle

A sophisticated strategic layer to add to the MCDM framework is the concept of [Total Cost of Ownership](https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost-of-ownership/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (TCO), or its more advanced variant, Total Value of Ownership (TVO). This principle extends the financial analysis far beyond the initial [purchase price](https://prime.greeks.live/area/purchase-price/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) to encompass all direct and indirect costs associated with the solution over its entire operational lifecycle. Adopting a TCO/TVO mindset fundamentally reframes the procurement question from “What is the cheapest option to buy?” to “What is the most economically advantageous solution to own and operate over the next five years?” This approach provides a powerful analytical justification for selecting a higher-priced initial offering that may yield significant savings or value in the long run.

> By quantifying the full lifecycle cost, the TCO model provides a robust, data-driven counterweight to the allure of a low initial purchase price.

The TCO model requires a disciplined accounting of all potential cost categories. These are often hidden liabilities in a simple price-based evaluation. A comprehensive TCO analysis forces the organization to think systemically about the impact of the acquisition across different departments and over time. For instance, a cheaper software solution might require more extensive user training, place a heavier burden on the internal IT helpdesk, or necessitate the purchase of expensive third-party tools for integration.

These are all real costs that will be borne by the organization. The TCO model makes them visible and attaches a dollar value to them, allowing for a true “apples-to-apples” financial comparison.

The following table illustrates the conceptual difference between a price-based view and a TCO-based view for two hypothetical software vendors.

| Cost Component | Vendor A (Low Price) | Vendor B (High Price) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Initial Purchase Price | $500,000 | $750,000 |
| Implementation & Integration Costs | $200,000 | $100,000 |
| User Training Costs | $75,000 | $25,000 |
| Annual Support & Maintenance | $100,000 (x 4 years) = $400,000 | $125,000 (x 4 years) = $500,000 |
| Required Third-Party Software | $50,000 | $0 |
| 5-Year Total Cost of Ownership | $1,225,000 | $1,375,000 |

In this simplified model, while Vendor A appears to be the cheaper option based on the purchase price, a more thorough TCO analysis might reveal a different picture once all associated costs are factored in. The Total Value of Ownership takes this a step further by also attempting to quantify the “upside” or value-generating aspects, such as the potential for increased revenue, improved productivity, or reduced operational risk. This transforms the evaluation from a cost-minimization exercise into a value-maximization one, providing the ultimate strategic defense against the dominance of price.

![A central crystalline RFQ engine processes complex algorithmic trading signals, linking to a deep liquidity pool. It projects precise, high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives, optimizing price discovery and mitigating adverse selection](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

![A glossy, segmented sphere with a luminous blue 'X' core represents a Principal's Prime RFQ. It highlights multi-dealer RFQ protocols, high-fidelity execution, and atomic settlement for institutional digital asset derivatives, signifying unified liquidity pools, market microstructure, and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/prime-os-core-for-best-rfq-digital-asset-derivatives-institutional-trade-flow.jpg)

## Execution

![Sleek, layered surfaces represent an institutional grade Crypto Derivatives OS enabling high-fidelity execution. Circular elements symbolize price discovery via RFQ private quotation protocols, facilitating atomic settlement for multi-leg spread strategies in digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-trading-system-core.jpg)

## Constructing the Definitive Evaluation Rubric

The practical execution of a value-based RFP evaluation hinges on the creation of a detailed, granular, and unambiguous [scoring rubric](https://prime.greeks.live/area/scoring-rubric/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). This document is the operational heart of the entire process. It translates the high-level strategic criteria into a set of specific, observable, and measurable indicators.

A well-constructed rubric leaves no room for subjective interpretation; it defines precisely what each score on the scale represents for every single evaluation criterion. This level of detail is essential for ensuring consistency across multiple evaluators, providing a clear audit trail for the decision, and giving defensible feedback to all participating vendors.

The development of the rubric must be a collaborative process involving all key stakeholders ▴ the business unit that will use the solution, the IT department that will support it, the finance department that will fund it, and the procurement team that will manage the process. This cross-functional input ensures that all critical perspectives are incorporated into the evaluation framework. The rubric should be structured hierarchically, starting with the main weighted criteria (e.g.

Technical Merit), breaking them down into sub-criteria (e.g. Scalability, Security, User Interface), and finally defining the performance indicators for each scoring level (e.g. a score of 5 for Security requires compliance with ISO 27001, evidence of annual penetration testing, and role-based access control down to the field level).

![A precision probe, symbolizing Smart Order Routing, penetrates a multi-faceted teal crystal, representing Digital Asset Derivatives multi-leg spreads and volatility surface. Mounted on a Prime RFQ base, it illustrates RFQ protocols for high-fidelity execution within market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-digital-asset-derivatives-high-fidelity-execution-probe.jpg)

## A Granular Scoring Rubric in Practice

The following table provides a detailed example of a scoring rubric for a single criterion, ‘Technical Merit,’ in an RFP for a new Customer Relationship Management (CRM) platform. This illustrates the level of granularity required for effective execution. The total score for ‘Technical Merit’ would be the sum of the scores for all its sub-criteria, which would then be multiplied by the overall weight assigned to this category (e.g. 40%).

| Sub-Criterion (Example Weight) | Scoring Scale (1-5) | Performance Definition |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Integration Capabilities (30%) | 1 | Requires significant custom development for all integrations. No pre-built connectors. |
| Security Framework (40%) | 1 | Fails to meet basic security standards. No third-party audits. |
| User Interface & Usability (30%) | 1 | Outdated, unintuitive interface. Requires extensive training for basic tasks. |

![Luminous blue drops on geometric planes depict institutional Digital Asset Derivatives trading. Large spheres represent atomic settlement of block trades and aggregated inquiries, while smaller droplets signify granular market microstructure data](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-driving-high-fidelity-execution-and-optimal-liquidity-discovery.jpg)

## The Evaluator’s Operational Playbook

With a robust rubric in place, the focus shifts to the human element of the evaluation. The process must be managed with discipline to prevent bias and ensure fairness. This requires a clear operational playbook for the evaluation committee.

- 
**The Kick-off Briefing** ▴ Before any proposals are reviewed, the entire evaluation committee must attend a mandatory briefing. This session reviews the strategic goals of the project, the final evaluation criteria and weights, the detailed scoring rubric, and the rules of engagement (e.g. confidentiality, communication protocols). This ensures every evaluator starts with the same understanding and commitment to the process.

- 
**Independent Initial Scoring** ▴ Each evaluator should complete their first pass of the technical proposals independently, without consulting with other committee members. This prevents “groupthink” and ensures that a diverse range of perspectives is captured in the initial scores. Evaluators should be required to provide a written justification for every score they assign, referencing specific evidence from the proposal.

- 
**The Consensus Meeting** ▴ After independent scoring is complete, the committee convenes for a consensus meeting. A facilitator leads the group through the rubric, criterion by criterion. For each criterion, the facilitator asks evaluators to share their scores. Where there are significant discrepancies, a structured discussion ensues.
Evaluators present their justifications, debating the merits of the proposal against the defined rubric. The goal is not to force everyone to the same score, but to understand the reasoning behind the differences and to adjust scores if a compelling argument is made. This process surfaces valuable insights and leads to a more robust and defensible final score.

- 
**Strict Adherence to the Two-Envelope Rule** ▴ The facilitator must rigorously enforce the two-envelope protocol. No discussion of price is permitted during the technical evaluation or the consensus meeting. The financial proposals are only opened after the final technical scores have been calculated, agreed upon, and formally signed off by the committee chair.

This disciplined, multi-stage process transforms the evaluation from a simple reading of documents into a structured analytical exercise. It ensures that the final decision is a product of deliberate, evidence-based reasoning, systematically insulating the outcome from the distorting influence of a low price tag.

![Stacked, multi-colored discs symbolize an institutional RFQ Protocol's layered architecture for Digital Asset Derivatives. This embodies a Prime RFQ enabling high-fidelity execution across diverse liquidity pools, optimizing multi-leg spread trading and capital efficiency within complex market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-stack-for-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## References

- Wouters, M. Anderson, J. C. & Wynstra, F. (2005). The adoption of total cost of ownership for sourcing decisions – a structural equations analysis. _Accounting, organizations and society_, 30(2), 167-191.

- Cebi, F. & Bayraktar, D. (2003). An integrated approach for supplier selection. _Logistics Information Management_, 16(6), 395-400.

- Ho, W. Xu, X. & Dey, P. K. (2010). Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection ▴ A literature review. _European Journal of Operational Research_, 202(1), 16-24.

- Degraeve, Z. Labro, E. & Roodhooft, F. (2000). An evaluation of vendor selection models from a total cost of ownership perspective. _European Journal of Operational Research_, 125(1), 34-58.

- Ellram, L. M. (1995). Total cost of ownership ▴ an analysis of implementation and practice. _International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management_, 25(8), 4-23.

- Yildiz, A. & Yayla, A. Y. (2015). Multi-criteria decision-making methods for supplier selection ▴ A literature review. _South African Journal of Industrial Engineering_, 26(2), 158-177.

- De Boer, L. Labro, E. & Morlacchi, P. (2001). A review of methods supporting supplier selection. _European journal of purchasing & supply management_, 7(2), 75-89.

- Gencer, C. & Gürpinar, D. (2007). Analytic network process in supplier selection ▴ A case study in an electronic firm. _Applied Mathematical Modelling_, 31(10), 2475-2486.

![Intersecting digital architecture with glowing conduits symbolizes Principal's operational framework. An RFQ engine ensures high-fidelity execution of Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives, facilitating block trades, multi-leg spreads](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Reflection

![Sleek metallic system component with intersecting translucent fins, symbolizing multi-leg spread execution for institutional grade digital asset derivatives. It enables high-fidelity execution and price discovery via RFQ protocols, optimizing market microstructure and gamma exposure for capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-system-rfq-protocols.jpg)

## The Evaluation System as a Mirror

Ultimately, an organization’s RFP evaluation process is a reflection of its own strategic clarity and operational discipline. A process that consistently defaults to the lowest bidder reveals an organization that has failed to articulate its own definition of value. It signals a culture where short-term cost savings are prioritized over long-term capability and strategic advantage. Conversely, an organization that executes a robust, multi-criteria, value-based evaluation demonstrates a deep understanding of its objectives and a commitment to achieving them.

![A central multi-quadrant disc signifies diverse liquidity pools and portfolio margin. A dynamic diagonal band, an RFQ protocol or private quotation channel, bisects it, enabling high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-rfq-protocols-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

## Beyond the Decision a Continuous System

The conclusion of an RFP is not the end of the process, but a data point in a continuous cycle of strategic sourcing. The framework used to select a partner should also be used to manage that partner relationship over time. The criteria and metrics established in the evaluation rubric become the foundation for performance reviews, service level agreement monitoring, and collaborative planning.

This transforms the RFP from a one-time transactional gate into the cornerstone of a dynamic supplier relationship management system. How might the ongoing measurement of a partner against the original evaluation criteria reveal new opportunities for value creation or highlight emerging risks long before they become critical issues?

![Smooth, reflective, layered abstract shapes on dark background represent institutional digital asset derivatives market microstructure. This depicts RFQ protocols, facilitating liquidity aggregation, high-fidelity execution for multi-leg spreads, price discovery, and Principal's operational framework efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-multi-leg-spreads.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/strategic-sourcing/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sophisticated, symmetrical apparatus depicts an institutional-grade RFQ protocol hub for digital asset derivatives, where radiating panels symbolize liquidity aggregation across diverse market makers. Central beams illustrate real-time price discovery and high-fidelity execution of complex multi-leg spreads, ensuring atomic settlement within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-rfq-protocol-facilitating-atomic-settlement-and-high-fidelity-execution-of-multi-leg-spreads.jpg)

## Strategic Sourcing

Meaning ▴ Strategic Sourcing, within the comprehensive framework of institutional crypto investing and trading, is a systematic and analytical approach to meticulously procuring liquidity, technology, and essential services from external vendors and counterparties. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sophisticated digital asset derivatives RFQ engine's core components are depicted, showcasing precise market microstructure for optimal price discovery. Its central hub facilitates algorithmic trading, ensuring high-fidelity execution across multi-leg spreads](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimizing-multi-leg-spreads-for-optimal-capital-efficiency.jpg)

## Rfp Evaluation

Meaning ▴ RFP Evaluation is the systematic and objective process of assessing and comparing the proposals submitted by various vendors in response to a Request for Proposal, with the ultimate goal of identifying the most suitable solution or service provider. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/technical-merit/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A luminous, multi-faceted geometric structure, resembling interlocking star-like elements, glows from a circular base. This represents a Prime RFQ for Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives, symbolizing high-fidelity execution of block trades via RFQ protocols, optimizing market microstructure for price discovery and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system.jpg)

## Technical Merit

Meaning ▴ Technical Merit, in the context of systems architecture and procurement, refers to the inherent quality, robustness, efficiency, scalability, and innovative design of a proposed technological solution or system. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-criteria/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A transparent glass sphere rests precisely on a metallic rod, connecting a grey structural element and a dark teal engineered module with a clear lens. This symbolizes atomic settlement of digital asset derivatives via private quotation within a Prime RFQ, showcasing high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency for RFQ protocols and liquidity aggregation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/architecting-high-fidelity-execution-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-and-systemic-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## Evaluation Criteria

Meaning ▴ Evaluation Criteria, within the context of crypto Request for Quote (RFQ) processes and vendor selection for institutional trading infrastructure, represent the predefined, measurable standards or benchmarks against which potential counterparties, technology solutions, or service providers are rigorously assessed. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/strategic-alignment/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, disc-shaped system, with concentric rings and a central dome, visually represents an advanced Principal's operational framework. It integrates RFQ protocols for institutional digital asset derivatives, facilitating liquidity aggregation, high-fidelity execution, and real-time risk management](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocol-engine-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

## Strategic Alignment

Meaning ▴ Strategic Alignment, viewed through the systems architecture lens of crypto investing and institutional trading, denotes the cohesive and synergistic integration of an organization's technological infrastructure, operational processes, and overarching business objectives to collectively achieve its long-term strategic goals within the digital asset space. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-committee/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract architectural representation of a Prime RFQ for institutional digital asset derivatives, illustrating RFQ aggregation and high-fidelity execution. Intersecting beams signify multi-leg spread pathways and liquidity pools, while spheres represent atomic settlement points and implied volatility](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/architecting-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-systems-for-optimized-rfq-execution-and-advanced-price-discovery.jpg)

## Evaluation Committee

Meaning ▴ An Evaluation Committee, in the context of institutional crypto investing, particularly for large-scale procurement of trading services, technology solutions, or strategic partnerships, refers to a designated group of experts responsible for assessing proposals and making recommendations. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost-of-ownership/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Intersecting muted geometric planes, with a central glossy blue sphere. This abstract visualizes market microstructure for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-5.jpg)

## Total Cost of Ownership

Meaning ▴ Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) is a comprehensive financial metric that quantifies the direct and indirect costs associated with acquiring, operating, and maintaining a product or system throughout its entire lifecycle. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/purchase-price/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Central teal cylinder, representing a Prime RFQ engine, intersects a dark, reflective, segmented surface. This abstractly depicts institutional digital asset derivatives price discovery, ensuring high-fidelity execution for block trades and liquidity aggregation within market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-core-framework.jpg)

## Purchase Price

Meaning ▴ The purchase price is the agreed-upon price at which an asset, such as a cryptocurrency or a derivative contract, is acquired by a buyer. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/scoring-rubric/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A multi-faceted crystalline form with sharp, radiating elements centers on a dark sphere, symbolizing complex market microstructure. This represents sophisticated RFQ protocols, aggregated inquiry, and high-fidelity execution across diverse liquidity pools, optimizing capital efficiency for institutional digital asset derivatives within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/rfq-protocols-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-price-discovery.jpg)

## Scoring Rubric

Meaning ▴ A Scoring Rubric, within the operational framework of crypto institutional investing, is a precisely structured evaluation tool that delineates clear criteria and corresponding performance levels for rigorously assessing proposals, vendors, or internal projects related to critical digital asset infrastructure, advanced trading systems, or specialized service providers. </a>

**Tags:** [Multi-Criteria Decision Making](https://options.greeks.live/area/multi-criteria-decision-making/), [Two-Envelope System](https://options.greeks.live/area/two-envelope-system/), [Lifecycle Cost Analysis](https://options.greeks.live/area/lifecycle-cost-analysis/), [RFP Scoring Rubric](https://options.greeks.live/area/rfp-scoring-rubric/), [Strategic Sourcing](https://options.greeks.live/area/strategic-sourcing/), [RFP Evaluation](https://options.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [Can Ahp Be Combined with Other Methodologies for a More Robust Procurement Process?](https://options.greeks.live/question/can-ahp-be-combined-with-other-methodologies-for-a-more-robust-procurement-process/)
![A layered, spherical structure reveals an inner metallic ring with intricate patterns, symbolizing market microstructure and RFQ protocol logic. A central teal dome represents a deep liquidity pool and precise price discovery, encased within robust institutional-grade infrastructure for high-fidelity execution.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-orchestrating-rfq-protocols-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-multi-asset-liquidity.jpg)

AHP can be combined with quantitative methods like TCO and DEA to build a robust, multi-layered procurement decision system.

- 
### [How Can an Organization Objectively Justify Selecting a Higher-Priced Bidder in an Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-objectively-justify-selecting-a-higher-priced-bidder-in-an-rfp/)
![Beige module, dark data strip, teal reel, clear processing component. This illustrates an RFQ protocol's high-fidelity execution, facilitating principal-to-principal atomic settlement in market microstructure, essential for a Crypto Derivatives OS.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-crypto-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine.jpg)

An organization justifies a higher-priced bid by architecting a value-based, data-driven case that proves lower Total Cost of Ownership.

- 
### [How Can an Organization Objectively Weight TCO against Qualitative Factors in an RFP Evaluation?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-objectively-weight-tco-against-qualitative-factors-in-an-rfp-evaluation/)
![An intricate, high-precision mechanism symbolizes an Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives RFQ protocol. Its sleek off-white casing protects the core market microstructure, while the teal-edged component signifies high-fidelity execution and optimal price discovery. A detailed circular dial suggests real-time implied volatility and quantitative analysis for portfolio margin.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-market-microstructure-optimization.jpg)

An organization objectively weights TCO against qualitative factors by architecting a weighted scoring system that reflects its strategic priorities.

- 
### [What Is the Best Way to Quantify Subjective Rfp Criteria for Objective Comparison?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-best-way-to-quantify-subjective-rfp-criteria-for-objective-comparison/)
![Interlocking transparent and opaque components on a dark base embody a Crypto Derivatives OS facilitating institutional RFQ protocols. This visual metaphor highlights atomic settlement, capital efficiency, and high-fidelity execution within a prime brokerage ecosystem, optimizing market microstructure for block trade liquidity.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/modular-framework-for-crypto-derivatives-os-rfq-protocol-aggregation.jpg)

Quantifying subjective RFP criteria involves architecting a weighted scoring model with clear rubrics to ensure a defensible, data-driven selection.

- 
### [How Do You Create a Weighted Scoring Model for an Rfp Evaluation?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-create-a-weighted-scoring-model-for-an-rfp-evaluation/)
![A precision optical component stands on a dark, reflective surface, symbolizing a Price Discovery engine for Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives. This Crypto Derivatives OS element enables High-Fidelity Execution through advanced Algorithmic Trading and Multi-Leg Spread capabilities, optimizing Market Microstructure for RFQ protocols.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-optimal-execution-system-microstructure.jpg)

A weighted scoring model is a system for translating strategic priorities into a quantifiable and defensible procurement decision.

- 
### [How Do You Define and Weight Non-Price Factors in a Value-Based Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-define-and-weight-non-price-factors-in-a-value-based-rfp/)
![A central toroidal structure and intricate core are bisected by two blades: one algorithmic with circuits, the other solid. This symbolizes an institutional digital asset derivatives platform, leveraging RFQ protocols for high-fidelity execution and price discovery. It optimizes market microstructure for capital efficiency, managing multi-leg spreads and latent liquidity within a Principal's operational framework.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-hub-integrating-algorithmic-intelligence-for-high-fidelity-price-discovery-and-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

A systematic process for translating strategic priorities into a quantitative model to select partners that offer the highest total value.

- 
### [What Are the Key Differences in the Evaluation Criteria between the Rfp and Rfq Phases?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-in-the-evaluation-criteria-between-the-rfp-and-rfq-phases/)
![A dark, precision-engineered module with raised circular elements integrates with a smooth beige housing. It signifies high-fidelity execution for institutional RFQ protocols, ensuring robust price discovery and capital efficiency in digital asset derivatives market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-system-core-high-speed-price-discovery-module.jpg)

An RFP's evaluation criteria assess a vendor's holistic value and problem-solving capability; an RFQ's criteria measure price for a known item.

- 
### [What Is the Difference between a Simple Scoring and a Weighted Scoring Model in Rfp Evaluation?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-a-simple-scoring-and-a-weighted-scoring-model-in-rfp-evaluation/)
![A multi-faceted crystalline form with sharp, radiating elements centers on a dark sphere, symbolizing complex market microstructure. This represents sophisticated RFQ protocols, aggregated inquiry, and high-fidelity execution across diverse liquidity pools, optimizing capital efficiency for institutional digital asset derivatives within a Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/rfq-protocols-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-price-discovery.jpg)

A simple scoring model tallies vendor merits equally; a weighted model calibrates scores to reflect strategic priorities.

- 
### [How Should an Organization Balance Price versus Quality in an Rfp Scoring Model?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-should-an-organization-balance-price-versus-quality-in-an-rfp-scoring-model/)
![Precision-engineered abstract components depict institutional digital asset derivatives trading. A central sphere, symbolizing core asset price discovery, supports intersecting elements representing multi-leg spreads and aggregated inquiry. Surrounding structures denote a robust Prime RFQ framework for high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency within market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-optimization.jpg)

A balanced RFP model is a calibrated system that quantifies quality to weigh it accurately against total lifecycle cost.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "How Can an Organization Prevent Price from Dominating an RFP Evaluation?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-prevent-price-from-dominating-an-rfp-evaluation/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-prevent-price-from-dominating-an-rfp-evaluation/"
    },
    "headline": "How Can an Organization Prevent Price from Dominating an RFP Evaluation? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "An organization prevents price dominance by architecting a multi-criteria evaluation system that quantifies strategic value and procedurally isolates cost assessment. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-prevent-price-from-dominating-an-rfp-evaluation/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-08T15:09:12+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-10-28T19:23:00+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-5.jpg",
        "caption": "Precise, interconnected geometric planes converge around a glossy blue sphere, embodying the intricate market microstructure of institutional digital asset derivatives trading. The central sphere signifies a high-value block trade or strategic multi-leg spread executed via RFQ protocols, optimizing price discovery across liquidity pools. This highlights high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency within a robust Crypto Derivatives OS, ensuring best execution for prime brokerage clients."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Evaluation Committee",
        "Evaluation Criteria",
        "Lifecycle Cost Analysis",
        "Multi-Criteria Decision Making",
        "Non-Price Factors",
        "Procurement Strategy",
        "Purchase Price",
        "RFP Evaluation",
        "RFP Scoring Rubric",
        "Scoring Rubric",
        "Strategic Alignment",
        "Strategic Sourcing",
        "Supplier Selection",
        "Technical Merit",
        "Technical Merit Evaluation",
        "Total Cost",
        "Total Cost of Ownership",
        "Two-Envelope System",
        "Value-Based Procurement",
        "Vendor Management"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-prevent-price-from-dominating-an-rfp-evaluation/
