# How Can an Rfp Disclaimer Be Overridden by Subsequent Issuer Behavior? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-07
**Categories:** Question

---

![A sleek green probe, symbolizing a precise RFQ protocol, engages a dark, textured execution venue, representing a digital asset derivatives liquidity pool. This signifies institutional-grade price discovery and high-fidelity execution through an advanced Prime RFQ, minimizing slippage and optimizing capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-integration-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-institutional-liquidity-aggregation-on-prime-os.jpg)

![A central illuminated hub with four light beams forming an 'X' against dark geometric planes. This embodies a Prime RFQ orchestrating multi-leg spread execution, aggregating RFQ liquidity across diverse venues for optimal price discovery and high-fidelity execution of institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-orchestrating-high-fidelity-execution-and-optimal-price-discovery.jpg)

## Concept

![A central glowing blue mechanism with a precision reticle is encased by dark metallic panels. This symbolizes an institutional-grade Principal's operational framework for high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-core-enabling-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution.jpg)

## The Brittle Shield of Boilerplate

An [RFP disclaimer](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-disclaimer/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) operates as a formal declaration of non-intent, a legal instrument designed to prevent the formation of a binding [process contract](https://prime.greeks.live/area/process-contract/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). Issuers deploy these clauses to maintain absolute discretion, theoretically allowing them to alter, abandon, or award the contract based on criteria that may evolve or remain entirely private. The core assertion of a disclaimer is that the RFP is a mere invitation to treat, not an offer that becomes a binding contract upon the submission of a compliant bid.

It seeks to negate the creation of what Canadian jurisprudence defines as “[Contract A](https://prime.greeks.live/area/contract-a/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite),” the preliminary contract governing the tender process itself, distinct from “[Contract B](https://prime.greeks.live/area/contract-b/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite),” the ultimate performance contract. This distinction is foundational to understanding the dynamics of procurement litigation.

However, the enforceability of such a disclaimer is not absolute. Its power erodes when the issuer’s subsequent actions contradict its written text. The legal system, particularly in common law jurisdictions, often looks beyond the literal text to the substantive reality of the parties’ interactions. When an issuer, through its words or deeds, creates a framework of rules, expectations, and obligations that mirrors a formal bidding process, it risks imbuing the process with contractual force.

This behavior can transform a stated invitation to treat into a de facto offer to all bidders to engage in a fair competition according to specified terms. The very conduct of the issuer can, in effect, write a new set of rules that overrides the original disclaimer, creating legal duties where none were intended to exist.

> A disclaimer’s legal integrity is contingent upon the consistent behavior of the issuer; contradictory actions can render it void.

![Sleek, domed institutional-grade interface with glowing green and blue indicators highlights active RFQ protocols and price discovery. This signifies high-fidelity execution within a Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives, ensuring real-time liquidity and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-prime-os-execution-interface.jpg)

## The Emergence of Implied Obligation

The overriding of an RFP disclaimer is rarely a single event. It is typically the result of an accumulation of behaviors that collectively signal an intention to be bound to a fair process. Courts will scrutinize the entire course of conduct, from pre-bid conferences to post-submission clarifications, to determine if the issuer has created a “Contract A.” Key indicators include the issuance of detailed [evaluation criteria](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-determine-the-appropriate-weighting-for-evaluation-criteria-in-an-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), the imposition of irrevocable bid periods, requirements for bid security, and representations of a fair and equal process. When an issuer insists on rigid compliance from bidders while reserving complete flexibility for itself, a court may find the arrangement unconscionable and imply a duty of fairness to balance the scales.

This is where doctrines like [promissory estoppel](https://prime.greeks.live/area/promissory-estoppel/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) gain traction. A bidder that reasonably relies on an issuer’s promise or representation to its detriment ▴ for instance, by investing significant resources in preparing a bid based on assurances of a specific evaluation methodology ▴ may have recourse even without a formal process contract. The issuer’s behavior creates an equitable obligation to uphold the representations made, effectively overriding the disclaimer’s attempt to negate all duties. The central question becomes whether the issuer’s conduct created a legitimate expectation of a particular process, an expectation that the law will protect from arbitrary and unfair deviation.

![Stacked, glossy modular components depict an institutional-grade Digital Asset Derivatives platform. Layers signify RFQ protocol orchestration, high-fidelity execution, and liquidity aggregation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/layered-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-stack-for-prime-brokerage.jpg)

![A sophisticated, multi-layered trading interface, embodying an Execution Management System EMS, showcases institutional-grade digital asset derivatives execution. Its sleek design implies high-fidelity execution and low-latency processing for RFQ protocols, enabling price discovery and managing multi-leg spreads with capital efficiency across diverse liquidity pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-platform-market-microstructure.jpg)

## Strategy

![Precision-engineered institutional grade components, representing prime brokerage infrastructure, intersect via a translucent teal bar embodying a high-fidelity execution RFQ protocol. This depicts seamless liquidity aggregation and atomic settlement for digital asset derivatives, reflecting complex market microstructure and efficient price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-prime-os-core.jpg)

## Navigating the Contract A/Contract B Framework

The strategic battleground for challenging an RFP disclaimer is overwhelmingly centered on the Canadian “Contract A/Contract B” legal framework, a model that has influenced [procurement law](https://prime.greeks.live/area/procurement-law/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) globally. Understanding this framework is essential for both issuers seeking to maintain flexibility and bidders seeking to enforce fairness. “Contract A” is the implied process contract that arises upon the submission of a compliant bid in response to a tender call that intends to create binding obligations.

Its terms are derived from the RFP documents and include implied duties of fairness, [good faith](https://prime.greeks.live/area/good-faith/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), and equal treatment of all bidders. “Contract B” is the formal contract for the goods or services, awarded to the winning bidder.

A well-crafted disclaimer aims to prevent the formation of “Contract A” altogether, stating explicitly that no [binding process](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-legal-differences-between-a-binding-and-non-binding-rfp-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) will be created. However, the strategy for a bidder seeking to override such a disclaimer involves demonstrating that the issuer’s actions were inconsistent with this “non-binding” posture. The goal is to build a case that, despite the disclaimer, a “Contract A” was implicitly formed through conduct. This involves a meticulous documentation of all interactions and a careful analysis of the RFP’s structure.

![A sleek, futuristic institutional grade platform with a translucent teal dome signifies a secure environment for private quotation and high-fidelity execution. A dark, reflective sphere represents an intelligence layer for algorithmic trading and price discovery within market microstructure, ensuring capital efficiency for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-rfq-execution-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-1.jpg)

## Factors Indicating the Formation of Contract A

Courts look for specific hallmarks of a binding process contract when evaluating whether a disclaimer has been effectively nullified by behavior. A bidder’s strategy should focus on identifying and evidencing these factors:

- **Irrevocability of Bids** ▴ A requirement that bids remain open for a specific period is a strong indicator of “Contract A.” It imposes a significant obligation on the bidder, which the law often balances with an implied duty of fairness on the issuer. 

- **Bid Security** ▴ Demanding a deposit or bid bond is another classic feature of a formal, binding tender process. It suggests that the issuer is treating the bids as serious offers capable of acceptance, not mere proposals for negotiation. 

- **Detailed and Prescriptive Requirements** ▴ An RFP that specifies highly detailed technical specifications, mandatory submission formats, and other rigid requirements suggests a formal competition rather than an open-ended request for proposals.

- **Explicit Evaluation Criteria** ▴ The publication of a detailed evaluation matrix, especially with weighted scoring, creates a strong expectation that the process will be followed. Deviating from this published methodology can be a key element in a breach of “Contract A.” 

- **Language of Obligation** ▴ The use of words like “must,” “will,” and “shall” in the RFP, as opposed to more permissive terms like “may” or “should,” can be interpreted as creating binding obligations on both parties. 

![A sleek cream-colored device with a dark blue optical sensor embodies Price Discovery for Digital Asset Derivatives. It signifies High-Fidelity Execution via RFQ Protocols, driven by an Intelligence Layer optimizing Market Microstructure for Algorithmic Trading on a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-high-fidelity-execution-engine-optimized-rfq-protocols-prime-os-intelligence-layer.jpg)

## Leveraging Promissory Estoppel and the Duty of Good Faith

Beyond the “Contract A” framework, a parallel strategy involves the equitable doctrine of promissory estoppel. This is particularly useful when the issuer makes specific representations or promises outside of the formal RFP document. For example, if during a pre-bid meeting, an issuer’s representative assures all potential bidders that a certain evaluation criterion will be prioritized, and a bidder relies on this assurance in preparing its proposal, a court may prevent the issuer from reneging on that promise, even if the RFP contains a broad disclaimer. 

> The issuer’s verbal and written communications become critical evidence in establishing a pattern of conduct that contradicts the disclaimer.

The strategy here is to demonstrate detrimental reliance. The bidder must show:

- A clear and unambiguous promise or representation was made by the issuer.

- The bidder acted in reasonable reliance on that promise.

- The bidder incurred significant costs or otherwise suffered a detriment as a result of that reliance.

- It would be unconscionable to allow the issuer to go back on its word.

This approach focuses on the fairness of the interaction, arguing that the issuer’s behavior created an obligation to act in good faith, irrespective of the disclaimer’s text. The overarching principle of good faith in contractual performance, as recognized in many jurisdictions, can be a powerful tool in persuading a court that an issuer cannot hide behind a disclaimer to justify arbitrary or unfair conduct. 

### Strategic Approaches to Overriding RFP Disclaimers

| Strategic Avenue | Core Legal Principle | Key Evidence | Potential Outcome |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Contract A Formation | Demonstrating that the issuer’s conduct created an implied process contract despite the disclaimer. | RFP terms (irrevocability, bid security), detailed evaluation criteria, formal communication protocols. | Finding of a breached process contract, potentially leading to damages for lost profits. |
| Promissory Estoppel | Enforcing a promise that was relied upon to the bidder’s detriment. | Minutes from meetings, email correspondence, verbal assurances from issuer representatives. | Damages for costs thrown away in preparing the bid; potentially an order to re-evaluate bids. |
| Duty of Good Faith | Arguing that the issuer breached an overarching duty of fairness and honest performance. | Evidence of unequal treatment, hidden preferences, or arbitrary decision-making. | Damages; declaration that the process was flawed. |

![Sleek, intersecting planes, one teal, converge at a reflective central module. This visualizes an institutional digital asset derivatives Prime RFQ, enabling RFQ price discovery across liquidity pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimizing-institutional-liquidity-aggregation-and-best-execution.jpg)

![A dark, robust sphere anchors a precise, glowing teal and metallic mechanism with an upward-pointing spire. This symbolizes institutional digital asset derivatives execution, embodying RFQ protocol precision, liquidity aggregation, and high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-1.jpg)

## Execution

![A sophisticated institutional-grade device featuring a luminous blue core, symbolizing advanced price discovery mechanisms and high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives. This intelligence layer supports private quotation via RFQ protocols, enabling aggregated inquiry and atomic settlement within a Prime RFQ framework](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-core-intelligence.jpg)

## An Operational Playbook for Challenging a Disclaimer

Successfully overriding an RFP disclaimer requires a disciplined, evidence-based approach. For a bidder who believes the process has been unfair, the execution of a challenge hinges on meticulously documenting the issuer’s behavior and mapping it to established legal principles. The following steps provide an operational playbook for constructing a robust challenge.

- **Initial Triage and Documentation** ▴ Immediately upon suspecting a breach of fairness, the bidder’s team must shift to an evidence-gathering mode. All verbal communications should be confirmed in writing. All emails, addenda, and other documents from the issuer must be preserved in a central repository. A timeline of events should be created, noting every interaction and its significance. 

- **Conduct-Disclaimer Contradiction Analysis** ▴ The core of the execution strategy is to identify direct contradictions between the disclaimer’s text and the issuer’s actions. This involves creating a two-column log. One column lists the specific clauses of the disclaimer (e.g. “This RFP does not create a binding process,” “The issuer reserves the right to change criteria at any time”). The adjacent column details every action by the issuer that runs counter to that clause (e.g. “Issued mandatory Addendum 3 with a new, non-negotiable submission deadline,” “Stated in a public Q&A that the published evaluation criteria were final”). 

- **Mapping Behavior to Legal Triggers** ▴ The documented behaviors must then be categorized according to the legal arguments they support. This is where the theoretical strategy translates into a concrete plan of attack. The table below illustrates this mapping process, providing a framework for organizing the evidence into a compelling legal narrative. 

### Mapping Issuer Behavior to Legal Arguments

| Issuer Behavior | Primary Legal Argument | Supporting Doctrine | Evidentiary Focus |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Issuing a detailed, weighted scoring matrix and then ignoring it. | Breach of “Contract A” ▴ failure to follow the established process. | Duty of Good Faith | The RFP document itself, the winning proposal (if obtainable), debriefing notes showing a different evaluation. |
| Verbally promising a bidder an extension and then disqualifying their late bid. | Promissory Estoppel ▴ detrimental reliance on a clear promise. | Misrepresentation | Witness statements, contemporaneous notes of the conversation, confirmation emails. |
| Allowing one bidder to submit material changes after the deadline while refusing others. | Breach of “Contract A” ▴ unequal treatment of bidders. | Duty of Fairness | Submission logs, correspondence with the favored bidder, addenda issued after the deadline. |
| Requiring an irrevocable bid for 120 days. | Formation of “Contract A” ▴ the presence of a key term of a binding process. | Implied Contract | The express terms of the RFP document. |
| Communicating secretly with one bidder to clarify its proposal. | Breach of “Contract A” ▴ providing an unfair advantage. | Duty of Fairness | Evidence of undisclosed meetings or communications, inconsistencies in the final proposals. |

![A sleek, circular, metallic-toned device features a central, highly reflective spherical element, symbolizing dynamic price discovery and implied volatility for Bitcoin options. This private quotation interface within a Prime RFQ platform enables high-fidelity execution of multi-leg spreads via RFQ protocols, minimizing information leakage and slippage](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-hub.jpg)

## The Anatomy of Effective and Ineffective Disclaimers

For issuers, the execution of a defensible procurement process begins with the drafting of the RFP itself. While no disclaimer is entirely invulnerable to challenge if the issuer’s behavior is sufficiently contradictory, some are far more robust than others. A poorly drafted disclaimer, especially one that is internally inconsistent or uses ambiguous language, can be an easy target for a legal challenge.

![Precision-engineered multi-vane system with opaque, reflective, and translucent teal blades. This visualizes Institutional Grade Digital Asset Derivatives Market Microstructure, driving High-Fidelity Execution via RFQ protocols, optimizing Liquidity Pool aggregation, and Multi-Leg Spread management on a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-multi-vane-system-illustrating-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-market-microstructure-optimized-liquidity-aggregation-prime-os-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Characteristics of a Strong Disclaimer

A strong disclaimer will be clear, unambiguous, and consistently reinforced by the language throughout the RFP. It will explicitly negate the formation of “Contract A” and avoid using language that creates binding obligations.

- **Explicit “No Contract A” Clause** ▴ The disclaimer should state, as the court approved in _Murray Purcha & Son Ltd v Barriere (District)_, “This RFP is not a call for tenders or a request for binding offers and no contractual or other legal obligations shall arise between the District and any Proponent as a result of the issuance of this RFP. ” 

- **Reservation of Broad Rights** ▴ It should clearly reserve the issuer’s right to reject all proposals, cancel the RFP, enter into negotiations with one or more proponents, and award a contract to any party, regardless of whether they submitted the lowest-priced or highest-scoring proposal.

- **Permissive Language** ▴ The RFP should consistently use permissive language (e.g. “the issuer may. “) rather than mandatory language (e.g. “the issuer will. “).

![A sleek, multi-layered platform with a reflective blue dome represents an institutional grade Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives. The glowing interstice symbolizes atomic settlement and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/optimized-rfq-protocol-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-1.jpg)

## Weaknesses That Undermine a Disclaimer

Conversely, a disclaimer is weakened when other parts of the RFP or the issuer’s conduct create a different impression. These are the vulnerabilities that a bidder’s legal team will seek to exploit.

- **The “Frankenstein” RFP** ▴ A common error is to take a traditional, binding RFP template and simply add a “non-binding” disclaimer clause at the beginning. This creates what one legal analysis calls a “‘Frankenstein’ RFP,” full of internal contradictions, such as demanding irrevocable bids while claiming the process is non-binding. 

- **Contradictory Language** ▴ Using mandatory language elsewhere in the document can override the disclaimer. For example, stating “the issuer will evaluate all proposals based on the following criteria” creates a procedural obligation that clashes with a claim of absolute discretion.

- **Imposing Onerous Bidder Obligations** ▴ When the RFP imposes significant burdens on bidders, such as requiring bid bonds or long irrevocability periods, it strengthens the argument that a “Contract A” was formed to provide bidders with corresponding rights to a fair process. 

![Abstract visual representing an advanced RFQ system for institutional digital asset derivatives. It depicts a central principal platform orchestrating algorithmic execution across diverse liquidity pools, facilitating precise market microstructure interactions for best execution and potential atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-platform-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-ecosystem.jpg)

## References

- McCarthy Tétrault LLP. “A Deep Dive into Canada’s Public Procurement Law – 2 Part Series.” 9 Dec. 2021.

- Cleary, Patrick. “Procurement Legal Basics ▴ Duty of Good Faith in RFPs vs. Tenders.” Alexander Holburn Beaudin + Lang LLP, 11 Oct. 2016.

- Alford, Lindsey, and Eden Bird. “Tendering for Government Business ▴ process contracts, good faith, fair dealing, and probity.” Argus Probity.

- Ron Engineering & Construction (Eastern) Ltd. v. The Queen in right of Ontario et al. 1 S.C.R. 111.

- Tercon Contractors Ltd. v. British Columbia (Transportation and Highways), 2010 SCC 4, 1 S.C.R. 69.

- Hughes Aircraft Systems International v. Airservices Australia (1997) 146 ALR 1.

- Waltons Stores (Interstate) Ltd v. Maher (1988) 164 CLR 387.

- Bhasin v. Hrynew, 2014 SCC 71, 3 S.C.R. 494.

![A sleek, light-colored, egg-shaped component precisely connects to a darker, ergonomic base, signifying high-fidelity integration. This modular design embodies an institutional-grade Crypto Derivatives OS, optimizing RFQ protocols for atomic settlement and best execution within a robust Principal's operational framework, enhancing market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-core-principal-system.jpg)

## Reflection

![A central core represents a Prime RFQ engine, facilitating high-fidelity execution. Transparent, layered structures denote aggregated liquidity pools and multi-leg spread strategies](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-engine-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

## Beyond the Document

The central lesson in the contest between RFP disclaimers and issuer conduct is that a legal document is not a static shield. Its integrity is dynamic, continuously tested and redefined by the actions of the parties it governs. For both issuers and bidders, this reality demands a shift in perspective. The procurement process cannot be viewed as a simple exchange of documents, but as the construction of a relationship, however temporary, governed by a mixture of explicit terms and implicit expectations.

The ultimate enforceability of any clause rests not on its text alone, but on its coherence with the system of actions and representations in which it operates. This understanding transforms the RFP from a mere administrative tool into a critical component of risk management and strategic positioning.

![A sleek, segmented cream and dark gray automated device, depicting an institutional grade Prime RFQ engine. It represents precise execution management system functionality for digital asset derivatives, optimizing price discovery and high-fidelity execution within market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-engine-optimal-institutional-digital-asset-execution-system.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/process-contract/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precision-engineered metallic component with a central circular mechanism, secured by fasteners, embodies a Prime RFQ engine. It drives institutional liquidity and high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives, facilitating atomic settlement of block trades and private quotation within market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-platform-rfq-engine-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-atomic-settlement-of-block-trades.jpg)

## Process Contract

Meaning ▴ A Process Contract defines a formalized, executable specification for a multi-stage operational or financial workflow within a digital asset ecosystem. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-disclaimer/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Teal capsule represents a private quotation for multi-leg spreads within a Prime RFQ, enabling high-fidelity institutional digital asset derivatives execution. Dark spheres symbolize aggregated inquiry from liquidity pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-prime-os-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Rfp Disclaimer

Meaning ▴ The RFP Disclaimer constitutes a formal statement, typically embedded within a Request for Proposal document, delineating the terms, conditions, and limitations governing the information provided, the proposal submission process, and the issuing institution's rights and responsibilities. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/contract-a/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precision mechanism, potentially a component of a Crypto Derivatives OS, showcases intricate Market Microstructure for High-Fidelity Execution. Transparent elements suggest Price Discovery and Latent Liquidity within RFQ Protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-crypto-derivatives-rfq-engine-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Contract A

Meaning ▴ Contract A defines a standardized, digitally-native forward agreement for a specific digital asset. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/contract-b/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Dark precision apparatus with reflective spheres, central unit, parallel rails. Visualizes institutional-grade Crypto Derivatives OS for RFQ block trade execution, driving liquidity aggregation and algorithmic price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-system.jpg)

## Contract B

Meaning ▴ Contract B, formally designated as a Dynamic Basis Swap, represents a configurable, principal-to-principal digital asset derivative instrument designed to optimize capital efficiency and manage complex yield or hedging requirements across disparate market structures. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-determine-the-appropriate-weighting-for-evaluation-criteria-in-an-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A macro view reveals the intricate mechanical core of an institutional-grade system, symbolizing the market microstructure of digital asset derivatives trading. Interlocking components and a precision gear suggest high-fidelity execution and algorithmic trading within an RFQ protocol framework, enabling price discovery and liquidity aggregation for multi-leg spreads on a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system-precision-engine.jpg)

## Evaluation Criteria

An RFP's evaluation criteria weighting is the strategic calibration of a decision-making architecture to deliver an optimal, defensible outcome. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/promissory-estoppel/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Geometric planes and transparent spheres represent complex market microstructure. A central luminous core signifies efficient price discovery and atomic settlement via RFQ protocol](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-4.jpg)

## Promissory Estoppel

Meaning ▴ Promissory Estoppel defines a legal doctrine preventing a party from reneging on a promise when the other party has reasonably relied on that promise to their detriment, even in the absence of a formal contract. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/procurement-law/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract geometric forms portray a dark circular digital asset derivative or liquidity pool on a light plane. Sharp lines and a teal surface with a triangular shadow symbolize market microstructure, RFQ protocol execution, and algorithmic trading precision for institutional grade block trades and high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-block-execution-microstructure.jpg)

## Procurement Law

Meaning ▴ Procurement Law defines the regulatory and contractual framework for institutional acquisition of goods and services. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/good-faith/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![An institutional-grade platform's RFQ protocol interface, with a price discovery engine and precision guides, enables high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives. Integrated controls optimize market microstructure and liquidity aggregation within a Principal's operational framework](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/proprietary-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-facilitating-high-fidelity-execution-and-granular-market-microstructure-analysis-for-prime-os.jpg)

## Good Faith

Meaning ▴ Good Faith, in a financial and operational context, denotes the adherence to honest intent and absence of fraudulent or deceptive conduct during contractual agreements and transactional processes. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-legal-differences-between-a-binding-and-non-binding-rfp-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Angular dark planes frame luminous turquoise pathways converging centrally. This visualizes institutional digital asset derivatives market microstructure, highlighting RFQ protocols for private quotation and high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-rfq-protocols-for-institutional-digital-assets.jpg)

## Binding Process

A binding RFP creates an immediate, enforceable process contract (Contract A); a non-binding RFP is a structured invitation to negotiate. </a>

**Tags:** [Procurement Law](https://options.greeks.live/area/procurement-law/), [RFP Disclaimer](https://options.greeks.live/area/rfp-disclaimer/), [Contract A](https://options.greeks.live/area/contract-a/), [Course of Dealing](https://options.greeks.live/area/course-of-dealing/), [Good Faith](https://options.greeks.live/area/good-faith/), [Promissory Estoppel](https://options.greeks.live/area/promissory-estoppel/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [What Are the Primary Legal Risks for an Owner When Managing a Contract a RFP?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-legal-risks-for-an-owner-when-managing-a-contract-a-rfp/)
![A sleek, futuristic institutional-grade instrument, representing high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives. Its sharp point signifies price discovery via RFQ protocols. The central Execution Management System EMS orchestrates multi-leg spread strategies, leveraging deep liquidity pools for block trade processing.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-rfq-execution-engine-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

An owner's primary legal risks in RFP management stem from breaching the duties of fairness and good faith inherent in the bidding process.

- 
### [How Can a Well-Defined Privilege Clause Protect an Organization during an Rfp Cancellation?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-a-well-defined-privilege-clause-protect-an-organization-during-an-rfp-cancellation/)
![A polished spherical form representing a Prime Brokerage platform features a precisely engineered RFQ engine. This mechanism facilitates high-fidelity execution for institutional Digital Asset Derivatives, enabling private quotation and optimal price discovery. It is central to managing liquidity pools for Bitcoin Options and Ethereum Futures, mitigating slippage.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-engine-optimal-execution-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

A well-defined privilege clause protects an organization by transforming the RFP from a rigid obligation into a controlled, flexible strategic tool.

- 
### [Can a Well-Drafted “Rights Reserved” Clause in an Rfp Completely Eliminate All Legal Liability for Cancellation?](https://options.greeks.live/question/can-a-well-drafted-rights-reserved-clause-in-an-rfp-completely-eliminate-all-legal-liability-for-cancellation/)
![Sleek teal and beige forms converge, embodying institutional digital asset derivatives platforms. A central RFQ protocol hub with metallic blades signifies high-fidelity execution and price discovery. The composition illustrates market microstructure efficiency, atomic settlement capabilities, and robust counterparty risk management for block trade liquidity via a Principal OS.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-microstructure.jpg)

A well-drafted 'Rights Reserved' clause is a powerful liability shield, not an absolute immunity, whose integrity depends on operational discipline.

- 
### [What Is the Legal Significance of Adhering to the Rfp Communication Plan?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-legal-significance-of-adhering-to-the-rfp-communication-plan/)
![Precision-engineered device with central lens, symbolizing Prime RFQ Intelligence Layer for institutional digital asset derivatives. Facilitates RFQ protocol optimization, driving price discovery for Bitcoin options and Ethereum futures. Robust design ensures high-fidelity execution, capital efficiency, and counterparty risk mitigation.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-institutional-rfq-protocol-engine-for-digital-asset-derivatives-options-trading.jpg)

Adhering to the RFP communication plan is a legal necessity, creating a binding, auditable framework that ensures fairness and mitigates risk.

- 
### [What Are the Legal Grounds for a Vendor to Sue after an Rfp Is Canceled?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-legal-grounds-for-a-vendor-to-sue-after-an-rfp-is-canceled/)
![A sleek, domed control module, light green to deep blue, on a textured grey base, signifies precision. This represents a Principal's Prime RFQ for institutional digital asset derivatives, enabling high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols, optimizing price discovery, and enhancing capital efficiency within market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-control-for-institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution.jpg)

A vendor's legal standing to sue post-RFP cancellation rests on proving the issuer breached an implied contract for a fair process.

- 
### [What Are the Key Differences in Legal Recourse for a Vendor in a Binding versus a Non-Binding Rfp Process?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-in-legal-recourse-for-a-vendor-in-a-binding-versus-a-non-binding-rfp-process/)
![Wah Centre Hong Kong](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg)

In a binding RFP, a vendor's recourse is a breach of contract claim for lost profits; in a non-binding RFP, it is an equitable claim for reliance costs.

- 
### [What Is the “Contract A/Contract B” Paradigm and How Does It Apply to the Rfp Process?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-contract-a-contract-b-paradigm-and-how-does-it-apply-to-the-rfp-process/)
![Central nexus with radiating arms symbolizes a Principal's sophisticated Execution Management System EMS. Segmented areas depict diverse liquidity pools and dark pools, enabling precise price discovery for digital asset derivatives. Circular markers denote RFQ participants, ensuring high-fidelity execution of institutional block trades within complex market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-rfq-liquidity-orchestration.jpg)

The Contract A/B paradigm imposes a binding process contract (A) on RFP participants, ensuring a fair competition to win the final work contract (B).

- 
### [What Are the Primary Legal Risks Associated with an Improperly Managed Binding Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-legal-risks-associated-with-an-improperly-managed-binding-rfp/)
![Smooth, layered surfaces represent a Prime RFQ Protocol architecture for Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives. They symbolize integrated Liquidity Pool aggregation and optimized Market Microstructure. Two spheres illustrate Atomic Settlement of a Multi-Leg Spread, reflecting High-Fidelity Execution.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/market-microstructure-rfq-protocols-for-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

An improperly managed binding RFP creates a breach of the preliminary process contract, exposing the issuer to legal action.

- 
### [What Are the Key Legal Differences between a Binding and Non-Binding Rfp Process?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-legal-differences-between-a-binding-and-non-binding-rfp-process/)
![The image displays a sleek, intersecting mechanism atop a foundational blue sphere. It represents the intricate market microstructure of institutional digital asset derivatives trading, facilitating RFQ protocols for block trades. The crossing elements symbolize multi-leg spread execution and aggregated liquidity, managed by a robust Prime RFQ for high-fidelity execution.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-rfq-execution.jpg)

A binding RFP creates an immediate, enforceable process contract (Contract A); a non-binding RFP is a structured invitation to negotiate.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "How Can an Rfp Disclaimer Be Overridden by Subsequent Issuer Behavior?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-rfp-disclaimer-be-overridden-by-subsequent-issuer-behavior/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-rfp-disclaimer-be-overridden-by-subsequent-issuer-behavior/"
    },
    "headline": "How Can an Rfp Disclaimer Be Overridden by Subsequent Issuer Behavior? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "An RFP disclaimer is overridden when an issuer's conduct creates a binding process contract or an equitable duty of fairness. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-rfp-disclaimer-be-overridden-by-subsequent-issuer-behavior/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-07T05:49:45+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-08-07T05:49:46+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-prime-os-execution-interface.jpg",
        "caption": "A sophisticated, glossy black and metallic interface features illuminated green and blue indicators, suggesting a control system for advanced financial operations. This visual metaphor embodies the precision and intelligence of an institutional digital asset derivatives platform. It depicts the market microstructure of RFQ protocols, enabling block trade execution and private quotation management. The system's intelligence layer optimizes price discovery and liquidity aggregation, ensuring best execution and robust risk management."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Contract A",
        "Contract B",
        "Course of Dealing",
        "Duty of Good Faith",
        "Equitable Estoppel",
        "Good Faith",
        "Issuer Behavior",
        "Non-Binding RFP",
        "Process Contract",
        "Procurement Fairness",
        "Procurement Law",
        "Promissory Estoppel",
        "RFP Disclaimer",
        "Tender Litigation"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-rfp-disclaimer-be-overridden-by-subsequent-issuer-behavior/
