# How Can Regulators Effectively Mandate and Audit the Use of XAI in Trading? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-02
**Categories:** Question

---

![Two abstract, polished components, diagonally split, reveal internal translucent blue-green fluid structures. This visually represents the Principal's Operational Framework for Institutional Grade Digital Asset Derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-prime-os-liquidity-framework.jpg)

![A sophisticated proprietary system module featuring precision-engineered components, symbolizing an institutional-grade Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives. Its intricate design represents market microstructure analysis, RFQ protocol integration, and high-fidelity execution capabilities, optimizing liquidity aggregation and price discovery for block trades within a multi-leg spread environment](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-proprietary-architecture-driving-high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-via-rfq-protocols-and-optimized-market-microstructure-dynamics.jpg)

## Concept

The imperative to embed Explainable AI (XAI) within the operational fabric of [algorithmic trading](https://prime.greeks.live/area/algorithmic-trading/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is a direct function of [systemic risk management](https://prime.greeks.live/area/systemic-risk-management/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). The deployment of complex, adaptive algorithms in financial markets introduces a structural opacity that challenges the foundational principles of market integrity and regulatory oversight. These systems, often characterized as “black boxes,” learn from vast datasets to execute strategies at speeds and frequencies that transcend human capability.

The core issue for a regulator is the inability to deconstruct the causal chain of an algorithm’s decision-making process, particularly during periods of market stress or in the aftermath of a disruptive event. This opacity creates a critical vulnerability; without a clear understanding of an algorithm’s logic, it becomes profoundly difficult to ascertain whether its actions are compliant with market rules, free from manipulative intent, or devoid of inherent biases that could distort market fairness.

The challenge extends beyond simple compliance. It touches upon the very stability of the market’s microstructure. An autonomous trading agent that develops an unforeseen, emergent strategy could interact with other automated systems in unpredictable ways, potentially triggering flash crashes or liquidity vacuums. The regulatory mandate for XAI, therefore, originates from a need to maintain a verifiable link between an algorithm’s action and its underlying intent.

It is about ensuring that as trading firms increase the computational sophistication of their strategies, they concurrently build the architectural capacity for transparent oversight. The goal is to transform the algorithm from an inscrutable black box into a transparent system whose logic, risk parameters, and operational boundaries can be interrogated and validated by both the firm and its supervising body.

> The integration of XAI is the architectural solution to the systemic risk posed by opaque algorithmic decision-making in financial markets.

![An intricate, transparent digital asset derivatives engine visualizes market microstructure and liquidity pool dynamics. Its precise components signify high-fidelity execution via FIX Protocol, facilitating RFQ protocols for block trade and multi-leg spread strategies within an institutional-grade Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-liquidity-ecosystem.jpg)

## What Is the Core Regulatory Problem?

The central problem for financial regulators is the erosion of accountability that accompanies the use of non-interpretable AI models. Financial markets are governed by a strict set of rules designed to ensure fairness, prevent manipulation, and manage risk. When a trading decision is made by a human, there is a clear line of inquiry. The trader can be questioned about their rationale, their understanding of the market conditions, and the intent behind their orders.

When a complex AI model makes a decision, that line of inquiry becomes blurred. The model’s “rationale” is a complex tapestry of weighted variables and non-linear relationships derived from its training data, which may be difficult for even its creators to fully articulate for a single decision.

This creates several specific regulatory challenges:

- **Market Manipulation Detection** ▴ How can a regulator distinguish between a legitimate, aggressive trading strategy and a prohibited manipulative one if the algorithm’s intent cannot be explained? An AI might learn patterns that, in effect, constitute spoofing or layering without any explicit instruction to do so.

- **Bias and Fairness** ▴ Algorithms trained on historical market data can inadvertently learn and perpetuate biases. This could lead to certain market participants being systematically disadvantaged. XAI is necessary to audit the model for such learned biases, ensuring compliance with fairness and market access rules.

- **Incident Analysis** ▴ In the event of a market disruption caused by an algorithm, a post-mortem analysis is critical. Without XAI, regulators and firms would struggle to understand the root cause, making it difficult to implement corrective measures and prevent recurrence.

![Abstract visualization of institutional digital asset RFQ protocols. Intersecting elements symbolize high-fidelity execution slicing dark liquidity pools, facilitating precise price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-protocol-execution-intelligence-layer.jpg)

## The Systemic Shift to Provable Compliance

Mandating XAI represents a fundamental shift in the philosophy of compliance. It moves from a reactive, forensic approach to a proactive, architectural one. Instead of solely analyzing trading data for evidence of wrongdoing after the fact, regulators are compelling firms to build systems that are compliant by design. This involves creating a persistent, auditable record of the AI’s decision-making process.

The requirement is for firms to possess the technical means to provide a coherent explanation for their algorithms’ behavior when called upon to do so. This capability for explanation becomes a core component of the firm’s operational and compliance infrastructure.

This approach acknowledges that while AI can provide significant efficiencies and opportunities for alpha generation, it also introduces a new class of operational risk. XAI is the primary tool for mitigating this risk. It provides the necessary transparency to ensure that the pursuit of technological advancement in trading does not come at the cost of [market integrity](https://prime.greeks.live/area/market-integrity/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) and stability. The focus becomes providing a “decision-specific confidence estimate” and a full audit trail for how a trading signal was generated.

![A transparent, multi-faceted component, indicative of an RFQ engine's intricate market microstructure logic, emerges from complex FIX Protocol connectivity. Its sharp edges signify high-fidelity execution and price discovery precision for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimized-for-best-execution.jpg)

![A metallic precision tool rests on a circuit board, its glowing traces depicting market microstructure and algorithmic trading. A reflective disc, symbolizing a liquidity pool, mirrors the tool, highlighting high-fidelity execution and price discovery for institutional digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols and Principal's Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-driving-high-fidelity-execution-and-market-microstructure-optimization-via-principal-prime-os.jpg)

## Strategy

Developing a regulatory strategy for XAI in trading requires a sophisticated balance between fostering innovation and enforcing market integrity. A simplistic, one-size-fits-all mandate would likely stifle technological progress, while a hands-off approach would permit the proliferation of opaque systems that heighten [systemic risk](https://prime.greeks.live/area/systemic-risk/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). The optimal strategy involves creating a tiered, principles-based framework that links the stringency of explainability requirements to the systemic footprint of the trading algorithm. This ensures that the regulatory burden is proportional to the potential market impact of the AI system.

![Abstract geometric planes in grey, gold, and teal symbolize a Prime RFQ for Digital Asset Derivatives, representing high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocol. It drives real-time price discovery within complex market microstructure, optimizing capital efficiency for multi-leg spread strategies](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocol-digital-asset-derivatives-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Principles-Based versus Rules-Based Frameworks

A purely rules-based approach, which might prescribe specific XAI techniques or output formats, is ill-suited for the rapidly evolving field of artificial intelligence. Such a rigid system would quickly become outdated and could be easily circumvented by new types of models. A principles-based framework, conversely, establishes high-level objectives that firms must meet, while allowing flexibility in how they achieve them. This encourages firms to develop innovative XAI solutions tailored to their specific models and trading strategies.

The core principles of such a framework would include:

- **Accountability** ▴ The firm is ultimately responsible for all decisions made by its algorithms. An inability to explain an algorithm’s action is not a valid defense.

- **Transparency** ▴ Firms must be able to provide regulators with a clear, human-understandable explanation of how their trading algorithms function, including the key factors that drive their decisions.

- **[Risk Management](https://prime.greeks.live/area/risk-management/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)** ▴ Explainability is a core component of [model risk management](https://prime.greeks.live/area/model-risk-management/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). Firms must demonstrate that they have processes in place to identify, measure, and mitigate the risks associated with opaque models.

- **Fairness** ▴ Firms must use XAI to audit their algorithms for biases that could lead to discriminatory or unfair market outcomes.

> A principles-based regulatory strategy provides the durability and flexibility needed to govern the evolving landscape of AI in finance.

![A segmented circular diagram, split diagonally. Its core, with blue rings, represents the Prime RFQ Intelligence Layer driving High-Fidelity Execution for Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/high-speed-prime-os-rfq-digital-asset-derivatives-trade-execution.jpg)

## A Tiered Approach to XAI Mandates

Recognizing that not all trading algorithms pose the same level of systemic risk, regulators can implement a tiered system of XAI requirements. The level of scrutiny and the depth of required explanation would be tied to factors like the algorithm’s trading volume, the complexity of its strategy, and its interaction with critical market infrastructure.

This tiered structure ensures that the most stringent requirements are applied where they are most needed, preventing smaller firms or less complex strategies from being burdened with disproportionate compliance costs. The goal is to create a scalable oversight mechanism that adapts to the diversity of the market.

### Tiered XAI Regulatory Framework

| Tier Level | Algorithm Characteristics | Mandated XAI Requirements |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Tier 1 ▴ High Systemic Impact | High-frequency trading strategies, algorithms interacting with central clearing, large volume market-making algorithms. | Real-time explainability, full audit trail of decision parameters, counterfactual analysis capabilities, pre-deployment model validation with regulators. |
| Tier 2 ▴ Moderate Systemic Impact | Execution algorithms for large institutional orders, smart order routers, arbitrage strategies across multiple venues. | Post-trade explainability on demand, feature importance reporting, regular model documentation updates. |
| Tier 3 ▴ Low Systemic Impact | Automated execution of simple strategies, algorithms with low trading frequency and volume. | Annual model documentation, clear description of the algorithm’s logic and intended behavior. |

![Abstract composition featuring transparent liquidity pools and a structured Prime RFQ platform. Crossing elements symbolize algorithmic trading and multi-leg spread execution, visualizing high-fidelity execution within market microstructure for institutional digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-system-precision-engineering-facilitating-high-fidelity-execution-via-rfq-protocols-and-optimal-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## Fostering Collaborative Ecosystems

An effective regulatory strategy cannot be developed in a vacuum. It requires active collaboration between regulators, financial institutions, and technology providers. Regulators can facilitate this by creating sandboxes or pilot programs where firms can test new AI models and XAI techniques in a controlled environment. This allows regulators to gain a deeper understanding of the technology while enabling firms to innovate without fear of immediate enforcement action.

Such collaboration helps in the development of standardized XAI frameworks and best practices that are both effective and practical to implement. This approach aligns with the direction suggested by emerging regulations like the European Union’s AI Act, which emphasizes a risk-based approach and the importance of technical standards.

![A precision-engineered metallic and glass system depicts the core of an Institutional Grade Prime RFQ, facilitating high-fidelity execution for Digital Asset Derivatives. Transparent layers represent visible liquidity pools and the intricate market microstructure supporting RFQ protocol processing, ensuring atomic settlement capabilities](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/robust-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-platform-for-optimized-rfq-protocol-execution-and-deep-liquidity-access.jpg)

![A precise, multi-layered disk embodies a dynamic Volatility Surface or deep Liquidity Pool for Digital Asset Derivatives. Dual metallic probes symbolize Algorithmic Trading and RFQ protocol inquiries, driving Price Discovery and High-Fidelity Execution of Multi-Leg Spreads within a Principal's operational framework](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-rfq-protocol-mechanism-for-digital-asset-derivatives-price-discovery-and-high-fidelity-execution-via-prime-os.jpg)

## Execution

The execution of a regulatory mandate for XAI in trading translates strategic principles into concrete operational requirements for firms and a detailed procedural playbook for auditors. This phase is where the architectural integrity of a firm’s trading systems is tested. It requires a granular approach to both mandating the necessary technical capabilities and auditing them for effectiveness. The objective is to create a supervisory regime where a firm’s claim of having an “explainable” model can be rigorously and consistently verified.

![A complex, multi-faceted crystalline object rests on a dark, reflective base against a black background. This abstract visual represents the intricate market microstructure of institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-execution-architecture.jpg)

## How Should Regulators Mandate XAI?

Mandating XAI effectively requires a set of specific, actionable directives that compel firms to build transparency into their algorithmic trading systems from the ground up. These mandates should focus on documentation, technical capabilities, and governance processes.

- **Comprehensive [Model Documentation](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-documentation-is-required-to-support-an-internal-model-based-close-out-calculation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)** ▴ Regulators must require firms to maintain a detailed “Model Development Document” for each trading algorithm. This document would serve as the foundational piece of evidence in an audit and should include:

<li>A clear statement of the algorithm’s purpose and intended trading strategy.

- A description of the data used to train and validate the model, including steps taken to identify and mitigate biases in the dataset.

- A detailed explanation of the model’s architecture and the rationale for its selection.

- A catalogue of the XAI techniques employed to ensure the model’s interpretability.

- The results of pre-deployment testing, including performance under various simulated market conditions.

</li>
- **Technical Explainability Requirements** ▴ Firms must be required to implement specific technical capabilities that allow for the interrogation of their models. This includes:

<li>**Feature Importance Analysis** ▴ The ability to identify and rank the input variables that had the most significant impact on a given trading decision.

- **[Counterfactual Explanations](https://prime.greeks.live/area/counterfactual-explanations/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)** ▴ The capacity to answer “what if” questions, such as “What is the minimum change in input X that would have reversed this trade decision?”. This demonstrates a deep understanding of the model’s decision boundaries.

- **Local Explanations** ▴ Providing a clear rationale for a single, specific trade, not just a general overview of the model’s behavior. Techniques like LIME (Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations) or SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) can be mandated for this purpose.

</li>
- **Governance and Oversight Frameworks** ▴ Regulators must mandate the establishment of internal governance structures responsible for algorithmic trading. This includes a [Model Risk](https://prime.greeks.live/area/model-risk/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) Management committee with clear authority to approve, monitor, and decommission algorithms. This committee would be responsible for signing off on the adequacy of the XAI framework for each model before it is deployed.

![A precision-engineered component, like an RFQ protocol engine, displays a reflective blade and numerical data. It symbolizes high-fidelity execution within market microstructure, driving price discovery, capital efficiency, and algorithmic trading for institutional Digital Asset Derivatives on a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-execution-engine-core-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-price-discovery.jpg)

## The XAI Audit Playbook

An audit of a firm’s XAI capabilities must be a rigorous, multi-faceted process that combines qualitative review of documentation with quantitative testing of the models themselves. The goal is to verify that the firm’s explanations are accurate, complete, and useful for regulatory oversight.

> An effective audit treats the XAI framework as a critical system to be tested with the same rigor as the trading algorithm itself.

The audit process can be broken down into distinct phases, each with specific objectives and procedures. Auditors would need to be a specialized team, combining expertise in quantitative finance, data science, and [financial regulation](https://prime.greeks.live/area/financial-regulation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite).

### XAI Audit Plan

| Audit Phase | Objective | Key Audit Procedures | Expected Output/Evidence |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Phase 1 ▴ Documentation Review | To assess the adequacy of the firm’s governance and model documentation. | Review the Model Development Document for completeness. Assess the minutes of the Model Risk Management committee. Verify the firm’s policies for algorithmic trading. | An audit report assessing the maturity of the firm’s governance framework. Identification of any gaps in documentation. |
| Phase 2 ▴ Technical Validation | To test the firm’s implemented XAI tools and techniques. | Select a sample of historical trades and request local explanations. Request counterfactual analysis for specific scenarios. Re-run feature importance analysis to verify results. | A set of XAI-generated reports for the sampled trades. A validation report confirming the accuracy and consistency of the firm’s XAI tools. |
| Phase 3 ▴ Data and Bias Audit | To scrutinize the data used to train the model for potential biases. | Analyze the statistical properties of the training data. Test the model’s performance across different market regimes and volatility levels. Use fairness metrics to detect algorithmic bias. | A data audit report detailing the composition of the training data. A bias assessment report with quantitative fairness metrics. |
| Phase 4 ▴ Stress Testing | To evaluate the model’s and the XAI’s performance under extreme market conditions. | Simulate market shocks and observe the algorithm’s behavior. Request explanations for decisions made during the stress test. Assess whether the XAI tools remain effective and informative. | A stress test report outlining the algorithm’s behavior and the quality of the explanations generated under duress. |

![A sleek, multi-layered device, possibly a control knob, with cream, navy, and metallic accents, against a dark background. This represents a Prime RFQ interface for Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-control-interface-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-and-prime-os.jpg)

## Quantitative Modeling and Data Analysis in Audits

A critical component of the audit involves a deep dive into the quantitative underpinnings of the AI model. Auditors cannot simply take the firm’s explanations at face value. They must have the capability to independently analyze the data and the model. This includes examining the training data for representativeness and potential for bias.

For instance, an algorithm trained primarily on data from high-volatility periods may behave erratically in a stable market. The audit must include procedures to detect such overfitting. The auditors would use their own set of fairness-aware machine learning techniques to probe the model, looking for statistical disparities in outcomes that could indicate discriminatory behavior, even if unintentional. This quantitative rigor is essential to move beyond a check-the-box compliance exercise and into a true assessment of the model’s integrity.

![The image features layered structural elements, representing diverse liquidity pools and market segments within a Principal's operational framework. A sharp, reflective plane intersects, symbolizing high-fidelity execution and price discovery via private quotation protocols for institutional digital asset derivatives, emphasizing atomic settlement nodes](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/systemic-interplay-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-via-advanced-rfq-protocols.jpg)

## References

- Arrieta, A. B. et al. “Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) ▴ Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges.” Information Fusion, vol. 58, 2020, pp. 82-115.

- Belle, V. & Papantonis, I. “Principles and Practice of Explainable Artificial Intelligence.” Frontiers in Big Data, vol. 4, 2021, p. 688969.

- Casey, B. et al. “The European Union AI Act.” The International Comparative Legal Guide to ▴ AI & Machine Learning 2023, 2023.

- Chakraborty, S. et al. “Interpretability of Deep Learning Models in Finance ▴ A Survey.” Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on AI in Finance, 2021.

- “Explainable AI (XAI) for Regulatory Compliance in Financial and Healthcare Sectors ▴ A comprehensive review.” International Journal of Computer Science and Engineering, vol. 12, no. 3, 2024, pp. 1-10.

- Goodman, B. & Flaxman, S. “European Union regulations on algorithmic decision-making and a ‘right to explanation’.” AI Magazine, vol. 38, no. 3, 2017, pp. 50-57.

- “Explainable AI in Algorithmic Trading ▴ Mitigating Bias and Improving Regulatory Compliance in Finance.” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2024.

- “Why Explainable AI in Banking and Finance Is Critical for Compliance.” Lumenova AI, 2024.

![An abstract composition depicts a glowing green vector slicing through a segmented liquidity pool and principal's block. This visualizes high-fidelity execution and price discovery across market microstructure, optimizing RFQ protocols for institutional digital asset derivatives, minimizing slippage and latency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/optimal-precise-digital-asset-derivative-rfq-execution-via-smart-protocols-for-institutional-trading.jpg)

## Reflection

![Abstract mechanical system with central disc and interlocking beams. This visualizes the Crypto Derivatives OS facilitating High-Fidelity Execution of Multi-Leg Spread Bitcoin Options via RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-microstructure-for-high-fidelity-block-trades.jpg)

## Integrating Explainability into Your Operational Core

The regulatory frameworks for XAI are evolving from abstract principles into concrete operational mandates. The critical question for any trading institution is how to architect its systems not just for performance, but for provable transparency. Viewing these requirements as a mere compliance burden is a strategic error.

Instead, consider the integration of a robust XAI framework as a core institutional capability, one that enhances risk management, builds investor confidence, and ultimately provides a durable competitive edge. How does your current operational framework measure up to a future where every significant algorithmic decision may require a clear, coherent, and verifiable explanation?

![A precise, multi-faceted geometric structure represents institutional digital asset derivatives RFQ protocols. Its sharp angles denote high-fidelity execution and price discovery for multi-leg spread strategies, symbolizing capital efficiency and atomic settlement within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-framework.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/systemic-risk-management/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A central illuminated hub with four light beams forming an 'X' against dark geometric planes. This embodies a Prime RFQ orchestrating multi-leg spread execution, aggregating RFQ liquidity across diverse venues for optimal price discovery and high-fidelity execution of institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-orchestrating-high-fidelity-execution-and-optimal-price-discovery.jpg)

## Systemic Risk Management

Meaning ▴ Systemic Risk Management refers to the identification, assessment, and mitigation of risks that could precipitate a collapse of an entire financial system or a significant market segment due to the failure of one or more interconnected entities. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/algorithmic-trading/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, spherical white and blue module featuring a central black aperture and teal lens, representing the core Intelligence Layer for Institutional Trading in Digital Asset Derivatives. It visualizes High-Fidelity Execution within an RFQ protocol, enabling precise Price Discovery and optimizing the Principal's Operational Framework for Crypto Derivatives OS](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-lens-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution.jpg)

## Algorithmic Trading

Meaning ▴ Algorithmic trading is the automated execution of financial orders using predefined computational rules and logic, typically designed to capitalize on market inefficiencies, manage large order flow, or achieve specific execution objectives with minimal market impact. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/market-integrity/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Transparent conduits and metallic components abstractly depict institutional digital asset derivatives trading. Symbolizing cross-protocol RFQ execution, multi-leg spreads, and high-fidelity atomic settlement across aggregated liquidity pools, it reflects prime brokerage infrastructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/cross-protocol-rfq-execution-digital-asset-derivatives-microstructure-system.jpg)

## Market Integrity

Meaning ▴ Market integrity denotes the operational soundness and fairness of a financial market, ensuring all participants operate under equitable conditions with transparent information and reliable execution. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/systemic-risk/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A polished, abstract geometric form represents a dynamic RFQ Protocol for institutional-grade digital asset derivatives. A central liquidity pool is surrounded by opening market segments, revealing an emerging arm displaying high-fidelity execution data](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-system.jpg)

## Systemic Risk

Meaning ▴ Systemic risk denotes the potential for a localized failure within a financial system to propagate and trigger a cascade of subsequent failures across interconnected entities, leading to the collapse of the entire system. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/model-risk-management/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract geometric planes, translucent teal representing dynamic liquidity pools and implied volatility surfaces, intersect a dark bar. This signifies FIX protocol driven algorithmic trading and smart order routing](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/optimized-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## Model Risk Management

Meaning ▴ Model Risk Management involves the systematic identification, measurement, monitoring, and mitigation of risks arising from the use of quantitative models in financial decision-making. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/risk-management/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A slender metallic probe extends between two curved surfaces. This abstractly illustrates high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives, driving price discovery within market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-instrument-navigating-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-for-optimal-price-discovery-and-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Risk Management

Meaning ▴ Risk Management is the systematic process of identifying, assessing, and mitigating potential financial exposures and operational vulnerabilities within an institutional trading framework. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-documentation-is-required-to-support-an-internal-model-based-close-out-calculation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![An intricate mechanical assembly reveals the market microstructure of an institutional-grade RFQ protocol engine. It visualizes high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives block trades, managing counterparty risk and multi-leg spread strategies within a liquidity pool, embodying a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-architecture.jpg)

## Model Documentation

A verifiable, auditable record proving an internal model's conceptual soundness, operational integrity, and regulatory compliance. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/counterfactual-explanations/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![An abstract, multi-component digital infrastructure with a central lens and circuit patterns, embodying an Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives platform. This Prime RFQ enables High-Fidelity Execution via RFQ Protocol, optimizing Market Microstructure for Algorithmic Trading, Price Discovery, and Multi-Leg Spread](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-grade-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-platform-powering-high-fidelity-execution-via-advanced-rfq-protocol-prime-os-intelligence-layer.jpg)

## Counterfactual Explanations

Meaning ▴ Counterfactual Explanations constitute a method for understanding the output of a predictive model by identifying the smallest changes to its input features that would result in a different, desired prediction. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/model-risk/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, layered structure with a metallic rod and reflective sphere symbolizes institutional digital asset derivatives RFQ protocols. It represents high-fidelity execution, price discovery, and atomic settlement within a Prime RFQ framework, ensuring capital efficiency and minimizing slippage](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution-via-prime-os.jpg)

## Model Risk

Meaning ▴ Model Risk refers to the potential for financial loss, incorrect valuations, or suboptimal business decisions arising from the use of quantitative models. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/financial-regulation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A luminous, multi-faceted geometric structure, resembling interlocking star-like elements, glows from a circular base. This represents a Prime RFQ for Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives, symbolizing high-fidelity execution of block trades via RFQ protocols, optimizing market microstructure for price discovery and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system.jpg)

## Financial Regulation

Meaning ▴ Financial Regulation comprises the codified rules, statutes, and directives issued by governmental or quasi-governmental authorities to govern the conduct of financial institutions, markets, and participants. </a>

**Tags:** [Market Integrity](https://options.greeks.live/area/market-integrity/), [Model Risk Management](https://options.greeks.live/area/model-risk-management/), [High-Frequency Trading](https://options.greeks.live/area/high-frequency-trading/), [Algorithmic Trading](https://options.greeks.live/area/algorithmic-trading/), [Counterfactual Explanations](https://options.greeks.live/area/counterfactual-explanations/), [Model Risk](https://options.greeks.live/area/model-risk/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [What Regulatory Frameworks Can Mitigate Systemic Risk in Automated Trading Systems?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-regulatory-frameworks-can-mitigate-systemic-risk-in-automated-trading-systems/)
![A sophisticated, angular digital asset derivatives execution engine with glowing circuit traces and an integrated chip rests on a textured platform. This symbolizes advanced RFQ protocols, high-fidelity execution, and the robust Principal's operational framework supporting institutional-grade market microstructure and optimized liquidity aggregation.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/advanced-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-architecture.jpg)

Regulatory frameworks mitigate systemic risk in automated trading by embedding a layered defense of pre-trade controls, market-wide circuit breakers, and post-trade surveillance into the market's core architecture.

- 
### [How Do Regulators View the Use of AI-Driven Algorithms for Best Execution?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-regulators-view-the-use-of-ai-driven-algorithms-for-best-execution/)
![Robust metallic infrastructure symbolizes Prime RFQ for High-Fidelity Execution in Market Microstructure. An overlaid translucent teal prism represents RFQ for Price Discovery, optimizing Liquidity Pool access, Multi-Leg Spread strategies, and Portfolio Margin efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-prime-os.jpg)

Regulators view AI in trading through the prism of existing best-execution rules, demanding a robust, auditable governance framework.

- 
### [What Are the Primary Challenges in Balancing Model Accuracy and Interpretability for Compliance?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-challenges-in-balancing-model-accuracy-and-interpretability-for-compliance/)
![A sleek, multi-segmented sphere embodies a Principal's operational framework for institutional digital asset derivatives. Its transparent 'intelligence layer' signifies high-fidelity execution and price discovery via RFQ protocols. Distinct segments highlight integrated liquidity pools, atomic settlement, and optimized market microstructure for efficient multi-leg spread trading.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocol-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-engine.jpg)

Balancing model accuracy and interpretability is a systemic challenge of integrating high-performance, opaque algorithms within a transparent, regulated financial framework.

- 
### [What Are the Regulatory Considerations When Implementing Ai Models for Lending Decisions?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-regulatory-considerations-when-implementing-ai-models-for-lending-decisions/)
![A stacked, multi-colored modular system representing an institutional digital asset derivatives platform. The top unit facilitates RFQ protocol initiation and dynamic price discovery. Central modules signify the core execution engine and aggregated liquidity. The base unit manages atomic settlement, optimizing capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine-15.jpg)

Navigating AI in lending requires a robust governance framework to ensure fairness, transparency, and compliance with all regulations.

- 
### [What Is the Role of the Second Line of Defense in Algorithmic Trading Governance?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-role-of-the-second-line-of-defense-in-algorithmic-trading-governance/)
![Stacked geometric blocks in varied hues on a reflective surface symbolize a Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives. A vibrant blue light highlights real-time price discovery via RFQ protocols, ensuring high-fidelity execution, liquidity aggregation, optimal slippage, and cross-asset trading.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/next-gen-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-system.jpg)

The second line of defense architects and enforces the risk control framework that ensures the stability and integrity of all automated trading.

- 
### [How Can the Explainability of GNN Models Be Improved in a Financial Context?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-the-explainability-of-gnn-models-be-improved-in-a-financial-context/)
![Detailed metallic disc, a Prime RFQ core, displays etched market microstructure. Its central teal dome, an intelligence layer, facilitates price discovery. Protruding rods signify low-latency RFQ protocol data transmission, ensuring high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-operating-system-intelligence-layer-powering-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-for-optimal-execution.jpg)

Improving GNN explainability in finance requires architecting a system where intrinsic and post-hoc methods translate model logic into auditable, actionable intelligence.

- 
### [What Are the Primary Challenges in Validating Machine Learning Risk Models?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-challenges-in-validating-machine-learning-risk-models/)
![A multi-layered, sectioned sphere reveals core institutional digital asset derivatives architecture. Translucent layers depict dynamic RFQ liquidity pools and multi-leg spread execution. The opaque half signifies robust institutional-grade infrastructure. A central core embodies the Prime RFQ intelligence layer, enabling high-fidelity execution, atomic settlement, and optimal price discovery.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-market-microstructure-1.jpg)

Validating ML risk models is a systemic challenge of imposing deterministic auditability upon probabilistic, opaque algorithms.

- 
### [How Does the Overhead of XAI Compare between Liquid Equity Markets and Less Liquid Derivatives Markets?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-overhead-of-xai-compare-between-liquid-equity-markets-and-less-liquid-derivatives-markets/)
![A sleek, abstract system interface with a central spherical lens representing real-time Price Discovery and Implied Volatility analysis for institutional Digital Asset Derivatives. Its precise contours signify High-Fidelity Execution and robust RFQ protocol orchestration, managing latent liquidity and minimizing slippage for optimized Alpha Generation.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-via-optimized-rfq-protocols-enhancing-market-microstructure.jpg)

XAI overhead shifts from real-time computational proof in equities to deep analytical validation in derivatives.

- 
### [To What Extent Have Post-Flash Crash Regulations Been Effective in Mitigating the Systemic Risks Posed by High-Frequency Trading?](https://options.greeks.live/question/to-what-extent-have-post-flash-crash-regulations-been-effective-in-mitigating-the-systemic-risks-posed-by-high-frequency-trading/)
![Abstract geometric forms converge around a central RFQ protocol engine, symbolizing institutional digital asset derivatives trading. Transparent elements represent real-time market data and algorithmic execution paths, while solid panels denote principal liquidity and robust counterparty relationships. This illustrates high-fidelity execution and precise price discovery within complex market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-core-for-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

Post-Flash Crash regulations have layered systemic defenses, enhancing market resilience but not eliminating HFT-induced risks.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "How Can Regulators Effectively Mandate and Audit the Use of XAI in Trading?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-regulators-effectively-mandate-and-audit-the-use-of-xai-in-trading/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-regulators-effectively-mandate-and-audit-the-use-of-xai-in-trading/"
    },
    "headline": "How Can Regulators Effectively Mandate and Audit the Use of XAI in Trading? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "Regulators can mandate XAI through tiered requirements for model transparency and audit it via rigorous technical and data-driven validation. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-regulators-effectively-mandate-and-audit-the-use-of-xai-in-trading/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-02T13:38:22+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-08-02T13:38:23+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/high-speed-prime-os-rfq-digital-asset-derivatives-trade-execution.jpg",
        "caption": "A segmented circular technical diagram, split diagonally, illustrates a Prime RFQ for Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives trading. Its central core, with blue rings, embodies the Intelligence Layer and Execution Engine ensuring High-Fidelity Execution for Options Trading. Outer segments detail RFQ protocols managing Liquidity Pools and Order Book Dynamics, enabling Price Discovery and Private Quotation. This system optimizes Capital Efficiency and mitigates Counterparty Risk in Market Microstructure."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "AI Governance",
        "Algorithmic Bias",
        "Algorithmic Trading",
        "Counterfactual Explanations",
        "Explainable AI",
        "Financial Regulation",
        "High-Frequency Trading",
        "Market Integrity",
        "Model Risk",
        "Model Risk Management",
        "Regulatory Compliance",
        "Risk Management",
        "Systemic Risk",
        "Systemic Risk Management",
        "XAI Audit"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "FAQPage",
    "mainEntity": [
        {
            "@type": "Question",
            "name": "What Is The Core Regulatory Problem?",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "@type": "Answer",
                "text": "The central problem for financial regulators is the erosion of accountability that accompanies the use of non-interpretable AI models. Financial markets are governed by a strict set of rules designed to ensure fairness, prevent manipulation, and manage risk. When a trading decision is made by a human, there is a clear line of inquiry. The trader can be questioned about their rationale, their understanding of the market conditions, and the intent behind their orders. When a complex AI model makes a decision, that line of inquiry becomes blurred. The model's \"rationale\" is a complex tapestry of weighted variables and non-linear relationships derived from its training data, which may be difficult for even its creators to fully articulate for a single decision."
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Question",
            "name": "How Should Regulators Mandate XAI?",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "@type": "Answer",
                "text": "Mandating XAI effectively requires a set of specific, actionable directives that compel firms to build transparency into their algorithmic trading systems from the ground up. These mandates should focus on documentation, technical capabilities, and governance processes."
            }
        }
    ]
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-regulators-effectively-mandate-and-audit-the-use-of-xai-in-trading/
