# How Can Regulators Ensure the Ethical Use of AI in Proactive Risk Modeling? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-06
**Categories:** Question

---

![A multi-layered electronic system, centered on a precise circular module, visually embodies an institutional-grade Crypto Derivatives OS. It represents the intricate market microstructure enabling high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols for digital asset derivatives, driven by an intelligence layer facilitating algorithmic trading and optimal price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-facilitating-high-fidelity-execution-and-optimal-price-discovery.jpg)

![Intersecting geometric planes symbolize complex market microstructure and aggregated liquidity. A central nexus represents an RFQ hub for high-fidelity execution of multi-leg spread strategies](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution-market-microstructure-optimisation.jpg)

## Concept

The core challenge in regulating artificial intelligence within [proactive risk modeling](https://prime.greeks.live/area/proactive-risk-modeling/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is one of system design. We are tasked with integrating a dynamic, adaptive, and potentially opaque computational architecture into the rigidly defined, high-stakes environment of global finance. The objective is to construct a regulatory framework that functions less like a prescriptive rulebook and more like a robust operating system, one that provides standardized protocols for governance, transparency, and accountability. [Financial institutions](https://prime.greeks.live/area/financial-institutions/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) can then build their proprietary AI applications to interface with this system, ensuring stability without stifling innovation.

Your institution feels the immense pressure to deploy advanced AI to maintain a competitive edge in risk analysis, yet the specter of regulatory scrutiny and the very real consequences of algorithmic failure demand a cautious, deliberate approach. The central tension arises from the nature of the technology itself. Traditional risk models, while complex, are typically deterministic and their logic, however convoluted, can be traced and validated. Modern AI models, particularly those employing deep learning, operate on principles of statistical inference across vast, multi-dimensional datasets.

Their decision-making pathways are emergent, evolving as they process new information. This creates the “black box” problem, a condition where the inputs and outputs are known, but the internal logic is not readily comprehensible to human auditors.

> A regulatory framework must be engineered to manage the systemic risks introduced by opaque and adaptive algorithms.

Therefore, ensuring the ethical application of these systems is an engineering problem before it is a legal one. It requires regulators to define the architectural standards for trust. These standards must address the three primary points of potential systemic failure. First is the integrity of the data ecosystem that feeds the models, as biased or incomplete data will invariably produce skewed and inequitable outcomes.

Second is the opacity of the model itself, which obscures the reasoning behind critical financial decisions, making independent validation nearly impossible. Third is the diffusion of responsibility, where the autonomous nature of the AI can create an accountability vacuum when failures occur. Addressing these three structural weaknesses is the foundational task of any viable regulatory approach.

![Polished metallic pipes intersect via robust fasteners, set against a dark background. This symbolizes intricate Market Microstructure, RFQ Protocols, and Multi-Leg Spread execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-metallic-nodes-illustrating-rfq-protocols-for-multi-leg-digital-asset-derivatives-institutional-execution.jpg)

## What Are the Primary Failure Points in AI Risk Models?

Understanding the specific vulnerabilities within AI-driven risk systems is the first step toward designing effective regulatory oversight. These are not merely technical glitches; they are fundamental architectural flaws that can compromise financial stability and fairness. The primary points of failure can be categorized into three distinct, yet interconnected, domains.

- 
**Data Provenance and Integrity** The axiom of “garbage in, garbage out” is amplified in AI systems. Historical data, which is the primary training material for risk models, often contains embedded societal biases. An AI trained on decades of lending data may inadvertently learn to replicate discriminatory patterns, even if sensitive demographic information is removed.
The model identifies proxies for these protected attributes, perpetuating inequality under a veneer of computational objectivity. A regulatory system must therefore mandate rigorous standards for data sourcing, cleaning, and ongoing monitoring to detect and mitigate such embedded biases.

- 
**Model Logic and Explainability** The “black box” nature of many advanced AI models presents a direct challenge to the core regulatory principle of transparency. If a financial institution cannot explain precisely why its model denied a loan or flagged a transaction as high-risk, it cannot demonstrate compliance with fair lending laws or other consumer protection statutes. This opacity also cripples effective [model risk management](https://prime.greeks.live/area/model-risk-management/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). Without a clear understanding of the model’s internal workings, it is impossible to predict how it will behave under novel market conditions, creating a significant source of [systemic risk](https://prime.greeks.live/area/systemic-risk/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite).

- 
**Governance and Accountability Structures** The speed and autonomy of AI decision-making can blur traditional lines of human accountability. When an AI model produces a harmful or erroneous outcome, determining responsibility can be difficult. Was the fault with the data scientists who built the model, the business unit that deployed it, the vendor who supplied the underlying algorithm, or the governance committee that approved its use? A robust [regulatory framework](https://prime.greeks.live/area/regulatory-framework/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) must compel institutions to establish an unambiguous chain of command for their AI systems, with clearly defined roles for human oversight, intervention, and ultimate accountability for all algorithmic decisions. 

![Detailed metallic disc, a Prime RFQ core, displays etched market microstructure. Its central teal dome, an intelligence layer, facilitates price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-operating-system-intelligence-layer-powering-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-for-optimal-execution.jpg)

![A refined object, dark blue and beige, symbolizes an institutional-grade RFQ platform. Its metallic base with a central sensor embodies the Prime RFQ Intelligence Layer, enabling High-Fidelity Execution, Price Discovery, and efficient Liquidity Pool access for Digital Asset Derivatives within Market Microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/prime-os-rfq-protocols-for-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

## Strategy

The strategic imperative for regulators is to architect a principles-based governance framework that is both resilient and adaptable. This involves moving away from static, technology-specific rules that quickly become obsolete and toward a durable architecture that defines what standards of safety and fairness must be met, while allowing institutions flexibility in how they meet them. This regulatory operating system must be built upon a layered architecture, with each layer addressing a fundamental aspect of AI risk.

This approach treats regulation as a form of systems engineering, creating a stable platform upon which financial innovation can be safely built. It provides clarity to the market, reduces ambiguity, and allows institutions to invest in AI development with a clear understanding of the operational guardrails. The economic logic is sound; a market with a trusted and transparent regulatory foundation for AI will attract more capital and foster more sustainable innovation over the long term. Compliance becomes a byproduct of good system design, rather than a separate, burdensome activity.

![Interconnected modular components with luminous teal-blue channels converge diagonally, symbolizing advanced RFQ protocols for institutional digital asset derivatives. This depicts high-fidelity execution, price discovery, and aggregated liquidity across complex market microstructure, emphasizing atomic settlement, capital efficiency, and a robust Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-protocols.jpg)

## A Principles-Based Regulatory Architecture

A durable regulatory strategy must be structured as a multi-layered system, where each component addresses a specific dimension of algorithmic risk. This architecture ensures a comprehensive approach, from the raw data that fuels the models to the governance structures that oversee their deployment.

- 
**The Foundation Layer [Data Governance](https://prime.greeks.live/area/data-governance/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) Protocols** This foundational layer sets the standards for the data that AI models consume. Regulators must mandate protocols that govern the entire data lifecycle. This includes requirements for data provenance to track its origin, standards for data accuracy and completeness, and rigorous processes for detecting and mitigating historical biases. It compels firms to demonstrate that their training datasets are as representative and fair as possible, neutralizing a primary source of algorithmic discrimination before the model is even built.

- 
**The Model Layer Transparency and Validation Standards** This layer addresses the “black box” problem directly. It mandates that AI models used in high-impact scenarios, such as credit underwriting or fraud detection, must be explainable. Regulators would require institutions to implement and document the use of Explainable AI (XAI) techniques.
This layer also codifies the requirements for independent model validation, ensuring a firm’s AI models are rigorously tested by a qualified party that is separate from the development team. The goal is to make the model’s logic transparent and auditable.

- 
**The Oversight Layer Accountability and Control Frameworks** The final layer ensures robust human control over the AI systems. This involves mandating a “[human-in-the-loop](https://prime.greeks.live/area/human-in-the-loop/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)” for critical decisions, preventing full automation in high-stakes contexts. It requires institutions to establish clear governance bodies responsible for AI strategy and risk, and to assign specific executive accountability for algorithmic outcomes. This layer ensures that technology remains a tool to support human judgment, with ultimate responsibility resting with designated individuals, not with the algorithm itself.

![Precision-engineered multi-vane system with opaque, reflective, and translucent teal blades. This visualizes Institutional Grade Digital Asset Derivatives Market Microstructure, driving High-Fidelity Execution via RFQ protocols, optimizing Liquidity Pool aggregation, and Multi-Leg Spread management on a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-multi-vane-system-illustrating-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-market-microstructure-optimized-liquidity-aggregation-prime-os-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## How Do Global Regulatory Approaches Compare?

Different jurisdictions are developing distinct strategic approaches to AI regulation, reflecting varied legal traditions and policy priorities. Understanding these differences is critical for global financial institutions that must navigate a complex and fragmented compliance landscape. The two most prominent models are the risk-based approach of the European Union and the principles-based, sector-specific approach of the United States and the United Kingdom.

### Table 1 ▴ Comparative Analysis of Global AI Regulatory Frameworks

| Framework Attribute | European Union (EU AI Act) | United States / United Kingdom Approach |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Core Philosophy | A horizontal, risk-based framework that classifies AI systems into categories (unacceptable, high, limited, minimal risk) with corresponding obligations. | A vertical, sector-specific approach that relies on existing regulators to apply technology-neutral principles of fairness, transparency, and accountability. |
| Application in Finance | AI for credit scoring and risk assessment is explicitly defined as “high-risk,” triggering stringent requirements for data quality, transparency, human oversight, and robustness. | Regulators like the SEC, CFPB, and FCA apply existing rules (e.g. fair lending laws) to AI systems, emphasizing that the outcome, not the technology, is what matters. |
| Key Requirements for Firms | Mandatory conformity assessments, extensive technical documentation, risk management systems, and registration in a public EU database for high-risk systems. | Demonstrating compliance with existing financial regulations, with a focus on robust model risk management, bias testing, and providing clear explanations for adverse decisions. |
| Strength | Provides legal certainty and a clear, unified standard across the single market. Its risk-based tiers focus regulatory resources on the most impactful applications. | Offers greater flexibility and allows for domain-specific expertise from established regulators. It avoids stifling innovation in lower-risk areas. |
| Challenge | The broad definitions and prescriptive nature could be rigid and slow to adapt to rapid technological change. The compliance burden for “high-risk” systems is substantial. | Can lead to a fragmented and potentially inconsistent regulatory landscape. The lack of a central AI-specific law may create legal ambiguity for firms. |

![A metallic disc, reminiscent of a sophisticated market interface, features two precise pointers radiating from a glowing central hub. This visualizes RFQ protocols driving price discovery within institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-price-discovery.jpg)

![Two reflective, disc-like structures, one tilted, one flat, symbolize the Market Microstructure of Digital Asset Derivatives. This metaphor encapsulates RFQ Protocols and High-Fidelity Execution within a Liquidity Pool for Price Discovery, vital for a Principal's Operational Framework ensuring Atomic Settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-execution-liquidity-aggregation-optimizing-market-microstructure-principal-trading-best-execution-atomic-settlement.jpg)

## Execution

The execution of a regulatory strategy for AI in finance transitions from architectural principles to operational protocols. This is where abstract concepts like fairness and transparency are translated into concrete, auditable actions for both regulators and financial institutions. Effective execution hinges on a set of dynamic, interactive, and technically sophisticated oversight mechanisms that can adapt to the evolving nature of AI technology.

> Effective regulation is not a static checkpoint but a continuous, iterative process of testing, monitoring, and validation.

This operational playbook focuses on three core pillars of execution ▴ creating controlled environments for innovation, mandating specific technical standards for transparency, and designing a dynamic auditing framework. These pillars work in concert to create a system of proactive governance, enabling regulators to identify and mitigate risks before they cascade through the financial system.

![A precise mechanical instrument with intersecting transparent and opaque hands, representing the intricate market microstructure of institutional digital asset derivatives. This visual metaphor highlights dynamic price discovery and bid-ask spread dynamics within RFQ protocols, emphasizing high-fidelity execution and latent liquidity through a robust Prime RFQ for atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineering-driving-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-across-advanced-rfq-protocols-and-prime-brokerage-frameworks.jpg)

## The Regulatory Sandbox a Prototyping Environment

A primary tool for execution is the [regulatory sandbox](https://prime.greeks.live/area/regulatory-sandbox/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). This is a controlled environment where financial institutions can test innovative AI-driven products and services on a limited scale with real consumers, under the direct supervision of the regulator. This serves a dual purpose. For the institution, it provides an opportunity to develop and refine its technology with greater regulatory certainty.

For the regulator, it is an invaluable source of intelligence, offering deep insights into the practical application and potential risks of emerging technologies. This collaborative prototyping allows for the co-creation of best practices and informs the development of more effective, evidence-based regulations.

![A sleek, white, semi-spherical Principal's operational framework opens to precise internal FIX Protocol components. A luminous, reflective blue sphere embodies an institutional-grade digital asset derivative, symbolizing optimal price discovery and a robust liquidity pool](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution-5.jpg)

## Mandating Explainable AI Protocols

A cornerstone of execution is the regulatory mandate for transparency through Explainable AI (XAI). Regulators must require that for any high-impact AI model, the institution must be able to produce a clear, human-understandable rationale for its decisions. This moves beyond a simple pass/fail test and demands a deeper level of insight into the model’s behavior. The table below outlines specific XAI techniques and maps them to concrete regulatory applications, demonstrating how these tools can be used to meet compliance objectives.

### Table 2 ▴ Explainable AI (XAI) Techniques and Their Regulatory Application

| XAI Technique | Technical Description | Regulatory Application |
| --- | --- | --- |
| SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) | A game theory-based approach that assigns an importance value to each feature for an individual prediction. It explains how each data point (e.g. income, credit history) contributed to the final decision. | Fulfilling fair lending requirements by providing a specific, feature-by-feature explanation for why a loan application was denied, as required by laws like the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA). |
| LIME (Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations) | An algorithm that explains the prediction of any classifier by learning an interpretable model (like a linear model) locally around the prediction. It answers the question “what changes in the data would have resulted in a different outcome?” | Assisting in model validation and debugging. It allows auditors to test the model’s logic by perturbing inputs to see if the model responds in a stable and intuitive manner. |
| Counterfactual Explanations | These methods describe the smallest change to the feature values of an input that would alter the prediction to a desired outcome. For example, “Your loan was denied, but would have been approved if your savings balance was $1,500 higher.” | Enhancing consumer transparency and empowerment. It provides actionable feedback to customers, which is a key principle of ethical financial practice and builds trust. |
| Partial Dependence Plots (PDP) | A global method that shows the marginal effect of one or two features on the predicted outcome of a machine learning model. It helps to visualize the overall relationship between a feature and the model’s output. | Enabling high-level model risk assessment. Regulators can use PDPs to understand the general behavior of a model and identify potentially problematic relationships or biases at a macro level. |

![Two high-gloss, white cylindrical execution channels with dark, circular apertures and secure bolted flanges, representing robust institutional-grade infrastructure for digital asset derivatives. These conduits facilitate precise RFQ protocols, ensuring optimal liquidity aggregation and high-fidelity execution within a proprietary Prime RFQ environment](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-grade-execution-channels-enabling-private-quotation-and-optimal-liquidity-aggregation-for-high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-on-prime-os.jpg)

## Designing a Tiered Audit and Reporting Framework

Finally, regulators must execute a tiered and dynamic auditing framework. This system would subject AI models to a level of scrutiny commensurate with their systemic importance and risk profile. A model used for internal operational efficiency would face a lighter touch than a model used for system-wide credit scoring.

This risk-based approach focuses regulatory resources where they are most needed. A key component of this framework is a standardized AI audit report.

![A sleek, abstract system interface with a central spherical lens representing real-time Price Discovery and Implied Volatility analysis for institutional Digital Asset Derivatives. Its precise contours signify High-Fidelity Execution and robust RFQ protocol orchestration, managing latent liquidity and minimizing slippage for optimized Alpha Generation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-via-optimized-rfq-protocols-enhancing-market-microstructure.jpg)

## What Should an AI Risk Audit Report Contain?

Regulators should mandate that firms periodically submit a detailed AI Risk Audit Report for their high-risk models. This report would serve as a primary tool for supervisory review and would need to contain several key components to be effective.

- 
**Model Inventory and Risk Classification** ▴ A comprehensive list of all AI models in production, with the institution’s internal risk classification for each and the justification for that classification.

- 
**Data Governance Documentation** ▴ Detailed records of the data sources used for training, including steps taken to assess and mitigate bias, and metrics on data quality and completeness.

- 
**Model Validation Report** ▴ The full report from the independent validation team, including the scope of testing, the results of performance and fairness assessments, and any identified model limitations or weaknesses. 

- 
**Explainability and Transparency Records** ▴ Examples of explanations generated for model decisions (e.g. using SHAP or LIME) and documentation of the XAI tools and processes in place.

- 
**Human Oversight and Governance Log** ▴ A record of human interventions, model overrides, and the minutes from the [AI governance](https://prime.greeks.live/area/ai-governance/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) committee meetings where the model’s performance and ethical implications were reviewed.

- 
**Adversarial Testing and Security Results** ▴ The outcomes of “red-teaming” exercises and other security audits designed to test the model’s resilience against manipulation and attack. 

![Abstract dark reflective planes and white structural forms are illuminated by glowing blue conduits and circular elements. This visualizes an institutional digital asset derivatives RFQ protocol, enabling atomic settlement, optimal price discovery, and capital efficiency via advanced market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-optimized-for-high-fidelity-execution-1.jpg)

## References

- Prenio, J. & Yong, P. (2021). Regulating AI in the financial sector ▴ recent developments and main challenges. FSI Insights on policy implementation, No 35. Bank for International Settlements.

- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2022). Regulatory approaches to Artificial Intelligence in finance. OECD Publishing.

- Centraleyes. (2023). AI Regulation in Finance. Centraleyes.

- Jaywing. (2024). AI Risk Modelling ▴ Regulatory Compliance and Ethical Considerations. Jaywing.

- Corporate Finance Institute. (2023). The Ethics of AI in Finance ▴ How to Detect and Prevent Bias. CFI.

- Lumenova AI. (2025). Why Explainable AI in Banking and Finance Is Critical for Compliance. Lumenova AI.

- FIS. (2024). The risks and ethical implications of AI in financial services. FIS.

- IBM. (2024). Maximizing compliance ▴ Integrating gen AI into the financial regulatory framework. IBM.

![Abstract geometric forms illustrate an Execution Management System EMS. Two distinct liquidity pools, representing Bitcoin Options and Ethereum Futures, facilitate RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution-6.jpg)

## Reflection

The development of a robust external regulatory architecture for AI compels a moment of internal reflection. The principles of transparency, accountability, and systemic integrity are not merely external compliance mandates; they are the very attributes that define a resilient and effective operational framework for any institution. As regulators construct these new systems of oversight, the essential question for every market participant becomes an internal one.

Is your own institution’s governance and risk architecture designed with the same level of rigor? Do you view your internal controls as a system to be engineered for peak performance and safety, or as a checklist to be completed?

The knowledge of these emerging regulatory protocols provides more than a roadmap for compliance. It offers a blueprint for building a superior internal operating system. The firms that will gain a decisive and sustainable edge in the age of AI will be those that internalize these principles, transforming them from regulatory burdens into core components of their own strategic framework. The ultimate goal is to create an internal system of intelligence and control so robust that it anticipates and exceeds any external mandate, ensuring that innovation always proceeds from a foundation of profound operational integrity.

![Sleek metallic system component with intersecting translucent fins, symbolizing multi-leg spread execution for institutional grade digital asset derivatives. It enables high-fidelity execution and price discovery via RFQ protocols, optimizing market microstructure and gamma exposure for capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-system-rfq-protocols.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/proactive-risk-modeling/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Internal components of a Prime RFQ execution engine, with modular beige units, precise metallic mechanisms, and complex data wiring. This infrastructure supports high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives, facilitating advanced RFQ protocols, optimal liquidity aggregation, multi-leg spread trading, and efficient price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-core-rfq-engine-for-institutional-digital-asset-options.jpg)

## Proactive Risk Modeling

Meaning ▴ Proactive Risk Modeling involves the anticipatory identification, quantification, and analysis of potential risks before they materialize, utilizing predictive analytical techniques. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/financial-institutions/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A crystalline geometric structure, symbolizing precise price discovery and high-fidelity execution, rests upon an intricate market microstructure framework. This visual metaphor illustrates the Prime RFQ facilitating institutional digital asset derivatives trading, including Bitcoin options and Ethereum futures, through RFQ protocols for block trades with minimal slippage](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Financial Institutions

Meaning ▴ Financial Institutions, within the rapidly evolving crypto landscape, encompass established entities such as commercial banks, investment banks, hedge funds, and asset management firms that are actively integrating digital assets and blockchain technology into their operational frameworks and service offerings. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/model-risk-management/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Translucent teal glass pyramid and flat pane, geometrically aligned on a dark base, symbolize market microstructure and price discovery within RFQ protocols for institutional digital asset derivatives. This visualizes multi-leg spread construction, high-fidelity execution via a Principal's operational framework, ensuring atomic settlement for latent liquidity](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/transparent-geometric-structures-visualizing-multi-leg-spread-rfq-protocols-for-high-fidelity-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

## Model Risk Management

Meaning ▴ Model Risk Management (MRM) is a comprehensive governance framework and systematic process specifically designed to identify, assess, monitor, and mitigate the potential risks associated with the use of quantitative models in critical financial decision-making. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/systemic-risk/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Precision metallic pointers converge on a central blue mechanism. This symbolizes Market Microstructure of Institutional Grade Digital Asset Derivatives, depicting High-Fidelity Execution and Price Discovery via RFQ protocols, ensuring Capital Efficiency and Atomic Settlement for Multi-Leg Spreads](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-for-precision-execution.jpg)

## Systemic Risk

Meaning ▴ Systemic Risk, within the evolving cryptocurrency ecosystem, signifies the inherent potential for the failure or distress of a single interconnected entity, protocol, or market infrastructure to trigger a cascading, widespread collapse across the entire digital asset market or a significant segment thereof. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/regulatory-framework/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Visualizes the core mechanism of an institutional-grade RFQ protocol engine, highlighting its market microstructure precision. Metallic components suggest high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives, enabling private quotation and block trade processing](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-core-1.jpg)

## Regulatory Framework

Meaning ▴ A Regulatory Framework, within the rapidly evolving crypto ecosystem and institutional investing landscape, constitutes a comprehensive and structured system of laws, rules, guidelines, and designated supervisory bodies designed to govern the conduct of digital asset activities, market participants, and associated technologies. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/data-governance/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Central metallic hub connects beige conduits, representing an institutional RFQ engine for digital asset derivatives. It facilitates multi-leg spread execution, ensuring atomic settlement, optimal price discovery, and high-fidelity execution within a Prime RFQ for capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-hub.jpg)

## Data Governance

Meaning ▴ Data Governance, in the context of crypto investing and smart trading systems, refers to the overarching framework of policies, processes, roles, and standards that ensures the effective and responsible management of an organization's data assets. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/human-in-the-loop/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Polished metallic disc on an angled spindle represents a Principal's operational framework. This engineered system ensures high-fidelity execution and optimal price discovery for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-platform.jpg)

## Human-In-The-Loop

Meaning ▴ Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) denotes a system design paradigm, particularly within machine learning and automated processes, where human intellect and judgment are intentionally integrated into the workflow to enhance accuracy, validate complex outputs, or effectively manage exceptional cases that exceed automated system capabilities. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/regulatory-sandbox/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Intricate metallic components signify system precision engineering. These structured elements symbolize institutional-grade infrastructure for high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-precision-engineering-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-latency-optimization.jpg)

## Regulatory Sandbox

Meaning ▴ A Regulatory Sandbox, within the digital finance and crypto sector, is a controlled testing environment established by regulatory authorities that permits financial technology firms to experiment with innovative products, services, or business models in a live market setting. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/ai-governance/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A macro view reveals the intricate mechanical core of an institutional-grade system, symbolizing the market microstructure of digital asset derivatives trading. Interlocking components and a precision gear suggest high-fidelity execution and algorithmic trading within an RFQ protocol framework, enabling price discovery and liquidity aggregation for multi-leg spreads on a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system-precision-engine.jpg)

## Ai Governance

Meaning ▴ AI Governance, within the intricate landscape of crypto and decentralized finance, constitutes the comprehensive system of policies, protocols, and mechanisms orchestrated to guide, oversee, and control the design, deployment, and operation of artificial intelligence and machine learning systems. </a>

**Tags:** [Regulatory Framework](https://options.greeks.live/area/regulatory-framework/), [Regulatory Sandbox](https://options.greeks.live/area/regulatory-sandbox/), [Systemic Risk](https://options.greeks.live/area/systemic-risk/), [AI Governance](https://options.greeks.live/area/ai-governance/), [Proactive Risk Modeling](https://options.greeks.live/area/proactive-risk-modeling/), [Algorithmic Bias](https://options.greeks.live/area/algorithmic-bias/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [How Can Financial Institutions Ensure the Accuracy and Fairness of Their Predictive Risk Models?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-financial-institutions-ensure-the-accuracy-and-fairness-of-their-predictive-risk-models/)
![A precision optical component on an institutional-grade chassis, vital for high-fidelity execution. It supports advanced RFQ protocols, optimizing multi-leg spread trading, rapid price discovery, and mitigating slippage within the Principal's digital asset derivatives.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-optical-component-prime-os.jpg)

A financial institution ensures model integrity by architecting a unified system where fairness is a core component of accuracy.

- 
### [How Can Financial Institutions Mitigate the Model Risk Associated with AI Driven Scoring Systems?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-financial-institutions-mitigate-the-model-risk-associated-with-ai-driven-scoring-systems/)
![A sleek, segmented cream and dark gray automated device, depicting an institutional grade Prime RFQ engine. It represents precise execution management system functionality for digital asset derivatives, optimizing price discovery and high-fidelity execution within market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-engine-optimal-institutional-digital-asset-execution-system.jpg)

Institutions mitigate AI model risk by architecting a dynamic, automated governance system that matches the adaptive nature of the models themselves.

- 
### [CFTC Integrates TradFi and DeFi Leaders into Advisory Subcommittee](https://options.greeks.live/news/cftc-integrates-tradfi-and-defi-leaders-into-advisory-subcommittee/)
![A precision-engineered interface for institutional digital asset derivatives. A circular system component, perhaps an Execution Management System EMS module, connects via a multi-faceted Request for Quote RFQ protocol bridge to a distinct teal capsule, symbolizing a bespoke block trade. This depicts high-fidelity execution, optimizing market microstructure within a Principal's operational framework for atomic settlement.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-interface-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-request-for-quote-protocol-high-fidelity-execution-within-principal-operating-system.jpg)

This initiative codifies a unified regulatory-industry interface, enhancing the architectural integrity of the digital asset market structure.

- 
### [What Are the Primary Regulatory Hurdles for Adopting Black Box AI Models in Trading?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-regulatory-hurdles-for-adopting-black-box-ai-models-in-trading/)
![A sophisticated, multi-component system propels a sleek, teal-colored digital asset derivative trade. The complex internal structure represents a proprietary RFQ protocol engine with liquidity aggregation and price discovery mechanisms. This visualizes high-fidelity execution of Bitcoin options or Ethereum futures, demonstrating capital efficiency and slippage minimization within a market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principals-high-fidelity-rfq-engine-for-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

The primary regulatory hurdles for black box AI in trading are its inherent opacity and the challenge of demonstrating accountability.

- 
### [How Does the Validation Process Differ for Models Detecting Predatory Trading versus Credit Default Risk?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-validation-process-differ-for-models-detecting-predatory-trading-versus-credit-default-risk/)
![A sleek, institutional grade sphere features a luminous circular display showcasing a stylized Earth, symbolizing global liquidity aggregation. This advanced Prime RFQ interface enables real-time market microstructure analysis and high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives. It represents dynamic price discovery via sophisticated RFQ protocols, optimizing capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-platform-displaying-global-liquidity-aggregation-and-real-time-price-discovery-for-rfq-protocols.jpg)

Validation differs by data velocity and intent; predatory trading models detect real-time adversarial behavior, while credit models predict long-term financial outcomes.

- 
### [How Does the ECB’s Guidance on Machine Learning Models Compare with Regulations in Other Jurisdictions?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-ecbs-guidance-on-machine-learning-models-compare-with-regulations-in-other-jurisdictions/)
![Precision metallic component, possibly a lens, integral to an institutional grade Prime RFQ. Its layered structure signifies market microstructure and order book dynamics. The blue center implies price discovery for digital asset derivatives, with markings for smart order routing and atomic settlement within RFQ protocols for high-fidelity execution.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/high-fidelity-institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-engine.jpg)

The ECB's ML guidance prioritizes prudential soundness and model explainability within its existing risk framework.

- 
### [What Are the Governance and Model Risk Challenges in Deploying Ai Benchmarks?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-governance-and-model-risk-challenges-in-deploying-ai-benchmarks/)
![An intricate, high-precision mechanism symbolizes an Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives RFQ protocol. Its sleek off-white casing protects the core market microstructure, while the teal-edged component signifies high-fidelity execution and optimal price discovery. A detailed circular dial suggests real-time implied volatility and quantitative analysis for portfolio margin.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-market-microstructure-optimization.jpg)

Deploying AI benchmarks demands a robust governance framework to mitigate model risk and ensure responsible innovation.

- 
### [What Are the Regulatory Implications of Using Black Box Models in Credit Underwriting?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-regulatory-implications-of-using-black-box-models-in-credit-underwriting/)
![Interconnected, precisely engineered modules, resembling Prime RFQ components, illustrate an RFQ protocol for digital asset derivatives. The diagonal conduit signifies atomic settlement within a dark pool environment, ensuring high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency. This visual metaphor encapsulates market microstructure and latency optimization.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-protocol-engine.jpg)

The use of black box models in credit underwriting mandates a system where technological opacity is pierced by regulatory requirements for transparency and fairness.

- 
### [What Are the Regulatory Implications of Using AI and Machine Learning for Market Surveillance?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-regulatory-implications-of-using-ai-and-machine-learning-for-market-surveillance/)
![Intersecting translucent blue blades and a reflective sphere depict an institutional-grade algorithmic trading system. It ensures high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols, facilitating precise price discovery within complex market microstructure and optimal block trade routing.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-algorithmic-execution-infrastructure-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-leveraging-advanced-rfq-protocols.jpg)

The use of AI in market surveillance requires firms to adapt existing regulatory obligations to a new technological paradigm.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "How Can Regulators Ensure the Ethical Use of AI in Proactive Risk Modeling?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-regulators-ensure-the-ethical-use-of-ai-in-proactive-risk-modeling/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-regulators-ensure-the-ethical-use-of-ai-in-proactive-risk-modeling/"
    },
    "headline": "How Can Regulators Ensure the Ethical Use of AI in Proactive Risk Modeling? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "Regulators ensure ethical AI by engineering a system of protocols for data integrity, model transparency, and human accountability. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-regulators-ensure-the-ethical-use-of-ai-in-proactive-risk-modeling/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-06T03:42:03+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-10-26T15:49:29+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-core-2.jpg",
        "caption": "This abstract depiction showcases the core of an advanced institutional digital asset derivatives trading system. A luminous teal sphere, symbolizing precise block trade execution and optimal capital efficiency, interacts within layers representing sophisticated RFQ protocols and dark pool liquidity aggregation. This visual metaphor highlights the intelligence layer of a Prime RFQ, facilitating high-frequency trading, robust delta hedging, and proactive systemic risk management for superior alpha generation and minimal slippage across multi-leg spreads."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "AI Ethics",
        "AI Governance",
        "Algorithmic Bias",
        "Compliance Architecture",
        "Data Governance",
        "Explainable AI (XAI)",
        "Financial Institutions",
        "Financial Regulation",
        "Human-in-the-Loop",
        "Model Risk",
        "Model Risk Management",
        "Proactive Risk Modeling",
        "Regulatory Framework",
        "Regulatory Frameworks",
        "Regulatory Sandbox",
        "Risk Management",
        "Systemic Risk"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "FAQPage",
    "mainEntity": [
        {
            "@type": "Question",
            "name": "What Are The Primary Failure Points In AI Risk Models?",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "@type": "Answer",
                "text": "Understanding the specific vulnerabilities within AI-driven risk systems is the first step toward designing effective regulatory oversight. These are not merely technical glitches; they are fundamental architectural flaws that can compromise financial stability and fairness. The primary points of failure can be categorized into three distinct, yet interconnected, domains."
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Question",
            "name": "How Do Global Regulatory Approaches Compare?",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "@type": "Answer",
                "text": "Different jurisdictions are developing distinct strategic approaches to AI regulation, reflecting varied legal traditions and policy priorities. Understanding these differences is critical for global financial institutions that must navigate a complex and fragmented compliance landscape. The two most prominent models are the risk-based approach of the European Union and the principles-based, sector-specific approach of the United States and the United Kingdom."
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Question",
            "name": "What Should An AI Risk Audit Report Contain?",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "@type": "Answer",
                "text": "Regulators should mandate that firms periodically submit a detailed AI Risk Audit Report for their high-risk models. This report would serve as a primary tool for supervisory review and would need to contain several key components to be effective."
            }
        }
    ]
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-regulators-ensure-the-ethical-use-of-ai-in-proactive-risk-modeling/
