# How Can We Mitigate the Risk of "Low-Bid Bias" in Our Rfp Scoring? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-09
**Categories:** Question

---

![Intersecting sleek components of a Crypto Derivatives OS symbolize RFQ Protocol for Institutional Grade Digital Asset Derivatives. Luminous internal segments represent dynamic Liquidity Pool management and Market Microstructure insights, facilitating High-Fidelity Execution for Block Trade strategies within a Prime Brokerage framework](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-engine.jpg)

![Two semi-transparent, curved elements, one blueish, one greenish, are centrally connected, symbolizing dynamic institutional RFQ protocols. This configuration suggests aggregated liquidity pools and multi-leg spread constructions](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-price-discovery-engine.jpg)

## Concept

The selection of a vendor through a Request for Proposal (RFP) process represents a critical juncture for any organization. It is a decision point where operational capability, financial prudence, and strategic intent converge. Yet, a persistent, systemic flaw often compromises the integrity of this process ▴ the phenomenon of “[low-bid bias](https://prime.greeks.live/area/low-bid-bias/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite).” This is not a simple error in calculation; it is a cognitive and structural vulnerability that emerges when the price of a proposal is allowed to disproportionately influence the evaluation of its qualitative merits.

An evaluation system where cost is revealed concurrently with technical and operational specifications is inherently susceptible to this distortion. The human mind, when presented with a low number, subconsciously seeks to validate that choice, often leading to a more generous assessment of non-monetary factors than they might otherwise receive.

This phenomenon was substantiated in a study by the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, which identified a systematic bias toward the lowest bidder when evaluators were privy to pricing information while assessing qualitative aspects. The consequence is a procurement process that defaults to cost savings as its primary output, frequently at the expense of long-term value, performance, and strategic alignment. The lowest bid can become a gravitational center, pulling the entire evaluation out of its intended orbit.

This results in the selection of vendors who meet a budgetary threshold but may introduce significant operational friction, higher [total cost of ownership](https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost-of-ownership/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) through unforeseen maintenance or integration challenges, and a fundamental misalignment with the organization’s strategic objectives. Mitigating this bias requires a systemic redesign of the evaluation architecture, treating the procurement process not as a simple purchasing function but as a sophisticated mechanism for strategic partner selection.

> The core challenge of low-bid bias is that it anchors evaluation to a single, often misleading, data point, obscuring the more complex calculus of long-term value.

![Interconnected translucent rings with glowing internal mechanisms symbolize an RFQ protocol engine. This Principal's Operational Framework ensures High-Fidelity Execution and precise Price Discovery for Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives, optimizing Market Microstructure and Capital Efficiency via Atomic Settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## The Systemic Impact of Price Anchoring

[Price anchoring](https://prime.greeks.live/area/price-anchoring/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) in an RFP evaluation creates a powerful cognitive shortcut that can derail even the most meticulously crafted requirements. When an evaluator sees a bid that is significantly lower than its competitors, that price point becomes the anchor against which all other information is judged. A vendor’s claims of technical proficiency or superior service, which might be scrutinized under normal circumstances, are viewed through a lens colored by the appeal of a bargain. This effect is subtle but potent, transforming the evaluation from an objective assessment into a subconscious effort to justify the most economically attractive option.

The systemic consequences extend beyond a single poor vendor choice. An organizational culture that consistently rewards the lowest bid fosters a procurement environment that prioritizes short-term financial metrics over long-term operational stability. This can lead to a cycle of underperforming vendors, frequent contract renegotiations, and a constant state of operational triage. It discourages high-quality vendors from participating in the [RFP process](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), as they recognize that their superior capabilities and higher-value solutions will be systematically undervalued.

Over time, the organization’s vendor pool degrades, its internal teams become frustrated, and its strategic initiatives are hampered by a foundation of inadequate tools and services. Addressing low-bid bias is therefore a matter of institutional risk management, safeguarding the organization’s operational integrity and its capacity for future growth.

![A metallic structural component interlocks with two black, dome-shaped modules, each displaying a green data indicator. This signifies a dynamic RFQ protocol within an institutional Prime RFQ, enabling high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/modular-rfq-protocol-engine-for-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os.jpg)

![An institutional grade RFQ protocol nexus, where two principal trading system components converge. A central atomic settlement sphere glows with high-fidelity execution, symbolizing market microstructure optimization for digital asset derivatives via Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-microstructure-2.jpg)

## Strategy

To systematically dismantle low-bid bias, an organization must move beyond ad-hoc measures and implement a robust, multi-faceted strategic framework. This involves re-architecting the [evaluation process](https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) to insulate qualitative assessment from the influence of price, while simultaneously creating a scoring structure that accurately reflects the organization’s strategic priorities. The objective is to design a system that selects for “[best value](https://prime.greeks.live/area/best-value/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)” rather than “lowest cost.” Such a system is built on principles of procedural separation, weighted evaluation, and clear, objective measurement criteria.

![A central luminous frosted ellipsoid is pierced by two intersecting sharp, translucent blades. This visually represents block trade orchestration via RFQ protocols, demonstrating high-fidelity execution for multi-leg spread strategies](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-orchestration-high-fidelity-execution-market-microstructure-intelligence-layer.jpg)

## Procedural Separation the Two-Stage Evaluation

The most potent strategy for directly counteracting low-bid bias is the implementation of a [two-stage evaluation](https://prime.greeks.live/area/two-stage-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) process. This approach creates a firewall between the assessment of a proposal’s technical and qualitative merits and the consideration of its cost. By preventing price from anchoring the initial evaluation, it allows for a more objective and clear-eyed assessment of a vendor’s ability to meet the organization’s needs.

There are two primary models for executing this strategy:

- **Sequential Evaluation** ▴ In this model, a single evaluation committee first receives and scores the technical and qualitative sections of all proposals without any access to pricing information. Only after these initial scores are finalized and documented is the pricing information revealed. The final decision is then made by combining the pre-established qualitative scores with the price scores, according to a predetermined weighting formula.

- **Parallel Evaluation** ▴ This model utilizes two distinct evaluation teams. One team, composed of subject matter experts, is tasked with evaluating the technical and qualitative aspects of the proposals. A separate team, typically from the procurement or finance department, is responsible for evaluating the pricing. The two sets of scores are then integrated to determine the final ranking. This provides an even stronger separation of concerns, though it requires greater coordination.

![A luminous digital market microstructure diagram depicts intersecting high-fidelity execution paths over a transparent liquidity pool. A central RFQ engine processes aggregated inquiries for institutional digital asset derivatives, optimizing price discovery and capital efficiency within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution-principal-operational-framework-price-discovery.jpg)

## Weighted Scoring and the Primacy of Value

A core component of a best-value [procurement strategy](https://prime.greeks.live/area/procurement-strategy/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is [weighted scoring](https://prime.greeks.live/area/weighted-scoring/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). This methodology assigns a specific weight to different sections of the RFP, ensuring that the final score reflects the organization’s true priorities. Rather than treating all criteria as equal, weighted scoring allows the organization to place a higher value on critical areas like technical capability, implementation support, or vendor experience, while still accounting for price. Best practices suggest that the price component should be weighted at 20-30% of the total score, preventing it from dominating the decision. 

![Two off-white elliptical components separated by a dark, central mechanism. This embodies an RFQ protocol for institutional digital asset derivatives, enabling price discovery for block trades, ensuring high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency within a Prime RFQ for dark liquidity](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-4.jpg)

## Developing a Weighted Scoring Framework

The creation of a [weighted scoring framework](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-simple-scoring-and-weighted-scoring-in-an-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is a strategic exercise that must involve key stakeholders from across the organization. The process begins with identifying the key domains of evaluation and assigning a percentage of the total score to each. This forces a conversation about what truly matters for the success of the project.

Consider the following example of a weighted [scoring framework](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-simple-scoring-and-weighted-scoring-in-an-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) for a new software implementation:

| Evaluation Category | Weight (% of Total Score) | Description |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Technical Solution & Functionality | 35% | Evaluates the core features of the proposed solution, its architecture, and its alignment with specified technical requirements. |
| Implementation & Support | 25% | Assesses the vendor’s plan for implementation, training, data migration, and ongoing technical support. |
| Vendor Experience & Past Performance | 20% | Considers the vendor’s history with similar projects, client references, and overall financial stability. |
| Cost & Pricing Structure | 20% | Evaluates the total cost of ownership, including licensing, implementation, maintenance, and any potential hidden costs. |

> By defining and sharing a weighted scoring model, an organization signals to vendors that value, not just price, will drive the selection process.

![Two spheres balance on a fragmented structure against split dark and light backgrounds. This models institutional digital asset derivatives RFQ protocols, depicting market microstructure, price discovery, and liquidity aggregation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-price-discovery-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## The Mandate for Granular Scoring Rubrics

A weighted framework is only as effective as the criteria used to generate the scores within each category. To ensure consistency and objectivity, a detailed [scoring rubric](https://prime.greeks.live/area/scoring-rubric/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is essential. A simple 1-to-3 scale is often insufficient, as it fails to capture the nuance between proposals. A more granular scale, such as 1-to-5 or 1-to-10, combined with clear descriptions for each score, empowers evaluators to make more precise and defensible assessments. 

This rubric should be developed before the RFP is issued and shared with all evaluators to ensure everyone is operating from a common set of expectations. An example of a scoring rubric for a single criterion is provided below:

| Score | Descriptor | Criterion ▴ 24/7 Phone Support |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 5 | Exceptional / Exceeds Expectations | Vendor provides 24/7/365 live phone support with a dedicated account manager and a guaranteed response time of under 15 minutes. |
| 4 | Good / Meets All Expectations | Vendor provides 24/7 live phone support. |
| 3 | Acceptable / Meets Most Expectations | Vendor provides phone support during extended business hours (e.g. 18 hours per day) and 24/7 support via an automated callback system. |
| 2 | Poor / Meets Minimal Expectations | Vendor provides phone support only during standard business hours (e.g. 9am-5pm in a single time zone). |
| 1 | Unacceptable / Does Not Meet Expectations | Vendor does not offer phone support, relying solely on email or a ticketing system. |

![Abstract geometric representation of an institutional RFQ protocol for digital asset derivatives. Two distinct segments symbolize cross-market liquidity pools and order book dynamics](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-protocol-2.jpg)

![An abstract composition featuring two intersecting, elongated objects, beige and teal, against a dark backdrop with a subtle grey circular element. This visualizes RFQ Price Discovery and High-Fidelity Execution for Multi-Leg Spread Block Trades within a Prime Brokerage Crypto Derivatives OS for Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-options-rfq-for-multi-leg-spreads-price-discovery.jpg)

## Execution

The successful execution of a strategy to mitigate low-bid bias hinges on the disciplined application of the chosen frameworks. This requires a shift from a passive evaluation process to an active, structured, and data-informed system of analysis. It involves creating an operational playbook that guides the procurement team through each stage of the process, from RFP construction to final [vendor selection](https://prime.greeks.live/area/vendor-selection/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). The goal is to embed the principles of value-based procurement into the organization’s operational DNA.

![Abstract spheres and a translucent flow visualize institutional digital asset derivatives market microstructure. It depicts robust RFQ protocol execution, high-fidelity data flow, and seamless liquidity aggregation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-market-microstructure-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-leveraging-rfq-protocols-and-atomic-settlement-across-prime-os.jpg)

## The Operational Playbook a Step-By-Step Guide

A well-defined operational playbook ensures that every RFP process is conducted with the same level of rigor and objectivity. It serves as a checklist and a guide for the procurement team and all involved stakeholders, minimizing ambiguity and reinforcing best practices.

- **Define Priorities and Build the Framework** ▴ 

<li>Convene key stakeholders to identify the most critical success factors for the project.

- Develop the weighted scoring framework, assigning percentages to each evaluation category based on these priorities. 

- Design the detailed scoring rubric for each criterion within the categories.

</li>
- **Construct the RFP with Scoring in Mind** ▴ 

<li>Write clear, unambiguous questions that are designed to elicit responses that can be easily scored against the rubric. Use closed-ended questions (e.g. “Do you provide X?”) for critical, non-negotiable requirements. 

- Include the weighted scoring framework and evaluation criteria in the RFP document itself. This transparency allows vendors to focus their proposals on what matters most to the organization.

</li>
- **Implement the Two-Stage Evaluation** ▴ 

<li>Establish clear procedural rules for the separation of technical and price evaluations. If using a single committee, ensure that pricing schedules are submitted in a separate, sealed envelope or digital folder that is not opened until the qualitative scoring is complete.

- If using two teams, provide clear charters for each team, defining the scope of their evaluation and preventing overlap.

</li>
- **Anonymize Submissions** ▴ 

<li>Where feasible, use procurement software or manual processes to anonymize vendor proposals during the qualitative review stage. This removes brand bias and incumbent favoritism from the initial assessment. 

</li>
- **Conduct Individual and Consensus Scoring** ▴ 

<li>Have each evaluator score the proposals individually using the provided rubric, without consulting with other evaluators. 

- Once individual scoring is complete, the facilitator should compile the scores and identify any areas with significant variance.

- Convene a consensus meeting to discuss these discrepancies. The goal of this meeting is not to force an average, but to understand the different interpretations and arrive at a more aligned, collective score. 

</li>
- **Calculate the Final Score and Make a Decision** ▴ 

<li>After the qualitative scores are finalized, the price scores can be calculated and integrated according to the weighted framework.

- The final decision should be based on the total weighted score, but it should not be automatic. A final review should be conducted to ensure the top-scoring vendor is a good cultural fit and that there are no other red flags.

</li>

> Disciplined execution of a structured evaluation plan is the mechanism that translates strategic intent into optimal procurement outcomes.

![Robust metallic structures, one blue-tinted, one teal, intersect, covered in granular water droplets. This depicts a principal's institutional RFQ framework facilitating multi-leg spread execution, aggregating deep liquidity pools for optimal price discovery and high-fidelity atomic settlement of digital asset derivatives for enhanced capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-optimized-for-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Quantitative Modeling the Data-Driven Decision

The power of a structured, value-based approach is most clearly demonstrated through quantitative modeling. By comparing a scenario riddled with low-bid bias to one that uses a mitigated, best-value framework, the impact on the final decision becomes starkly apparent.

![Precision metallic bars intersect above a dark circuit board, symbolizing RFQ protocols driving high-fidelity execution within market microstructure. This represents atomic settlement for institutional digital asset derivatives, enabling price discovery and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-precision-systemic-framework.jpg)

## Scenario 1 the Low-Bid Bias Trap

In this scenario, price is over-weighted at 50%, and the scoring rubric is poorly defined, leading to inconsistent qualitative scores. Price is considered alongside the technical proposal.

| Vendor | Qualitative Score (out of 100) | Annual Cost | Price Score (Lowest Price = 100) | Weighted Qualitative Score (Weight ▴ 50%) | Weighted Price Score (Weight ▴ 50%) | Final Score |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor A (Low Bid) | 65 | $100,000 | 100 | 32.5 | 50.0 | 82.5 |
| Vendor B (Best Value) | 90 | $140,000 | 71.4 | 45.0 | 35.7 | 80.7 |
| Vendor C (High End) | 95 | $170,000 | 58.8 | 47.5 | 29.4 | 76.9 |

**Outcome** ▴ Vendor A wins, despite a significantly lower [qualitative score](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-counterparty-performance-score-differ-from-a-traditional-credit-score/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). The organization acquires a cheaper, but inferior, solution.

![Abstract depiction of an advanced institutional trading system, featuring a prominent sensor for real-time price discovery and an intelligence layer. Visible circuitry signifies algorithmic trading capabilities, low-latency execution, and robust FIX protocol integration for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-high-fidelity-rfq-protocols.jpg)

## Scenario 2 the Best-Value Framework in Action

In this scenario, a best-value framework is applied. Price is weighted at a more appropriate 20%, and a two-stage evaluation has produced more reliable qualitative scores.

| Vendor | Qualitative Score (out of 100) | Annual Cost | Price Score (Lowest Price = 100) | Weighted Qualitative Score (Weight ▴ 80%) | Weighted Price Score (Weight ▴ 20%) | Final Score |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor A (Low Bid) | 65 | $100,000 | 100 | 52.0 | 20.0 | 72.0 |
| Vendor B (Best Value) | 90 | $140,000 | 71.4 | 72.0 | 14.3 | 86.3 |
| Vendor C (High End) | 95 | $170,000 | 58.8 | 76.0 | 11.8 | 87.8 |

**Outcome** ▴ Vendor C now has the highest score, with Vendor B a very close second. The discussion now shifts from “who is cheapest” to “what is the marginal value of Vendor C’s solution over Vendor B’s for the additional cost.” The organization is now making a strategic, value-based decision, selecting the vendor that provides the optimal balance of performance and cost.

![Robust institutional-grade structures converge on a central, glowing bi-color orb. This visualizes an RFQ protocol's dynamic interface, representing the Principal's operational framework for high-fidelity execution and precise price discovery within digital asset market microstructure, enabling atomic settlement for block trades](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-prime-os-engine.jpg)

## References

- Dror, Itiel E. and Koby Koshkoro. “The Lower Bid Bias ▴ The Effect of Price on Professional’s Evaluation of Quality in a Tender.” _Journal of Behavioral Decision Making_, vol. 27, no. 4, 2014, pp. 366-373.

- Flyvbjerg, Bent. “From Nobel Prize to Project Management ▴ Getting Risks Right.” _Project Management Journal_, vol. 37, no. 3, 2006, pp. 5-15.

- Kash, Don E. and Robert W. Rycroft. “US federal procurement policy ▴ The Small Business Innovation Research program.” _Technology in Society_, vol. 18, no. 2, 1996, pp. 163-181.

- Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman. “Judgment under Uncertainty ▴ Heuristics and Biases.” _Science_, vol. 185, no. 4157, 1974, pp. 1124-1131.

- “RFP Scoring Best Practices for Vendor Selection.” _RFP360_, 2022.

- “RFP Evaluation Guide ▴ 4 Mistakes You Might be Making in Your RFP Process.” _Euna Solutions_, 2023.

![Two precision-engineered nodes, possibly representing a Private Quotation or RFQ mechanism, connect via a transparent conduit against a striped Market Microstructure backdrop. This visualizes High-Fidelity Execution pathways for Institutional Grade Digital Asset Derivatives, enabling Atomic Settlement and Capital Efficiency within a Dark Pool environment, optimizing Price Discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-system-nodes.jpg)

## Reflection

The frameworks and models presented offer a systematic approach to neutralizing the distortions of low-bid bias. They provide a blueprint for constructing an evaluation process grounded in objectivity and strategic alignment. The implementation of these systems, however, requires more than procedural discipline; it demands a fundamental shift in organizational perspective.

It necessitates viewing procurement not as a cost center, but as a strategic enabler. The true measure of a successful RFP process is not the discount negotiated at signing, but the operational value delivered over the lifetime of the engagement.

Consider the current procurement architecture within your own organization. Is it designed to identify the lowest price, or to uncover the greatest value? Does it possess the structural integrity to resist cognitive biases, or does it inadvertently amplify them? The transition to a value-based model is an investment in decision quality.

It is the deliberate engineering of a system designed to produce consistently superior outcomes, securing the tools and partnerships necessary to drive the organization’s mission forward. The ultimate advantage is found in the quiet confidence that comes from knowing your most critical partnerships are built on a foundation of comprehensive value, not just a compelling price tag.

![A sphere split into light and dark segments, revealing a luminous core. This encapsulates the precise Request for Quote RFQ protocol for institutional digital asset derivatives, highlighting high-fidelity execution, optimal price discovery, and advanced market microstructure within aggregated liquidity pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-execution-framework-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-request-for-quote-protocol-optimization.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/low-bid-bias/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A dark blue sphere and teal-hued circular elements on a segmented surface, bisected by a diagonal line. This visualizes institutional block trade aggregation, algorithmic price discovery, and high-fidelity execution within a Principal's Prime RFQ, optimizing capital efficiency and mitigating counterparty risk for digital asset derivatives and multi-leg spreads](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/market-microstructure-driven-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq.jpg)

## Low-Bid Bias

Meaning ▴ Low-Bid Bias, in the context of procurement systems and Request for Quote (RFQ) processes within institutional crypto trading, refers to an organizational tendency to favor bids solely based on the lowest price offered. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost-of-ownership/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Interlocking dark modules with luminous data streams represent an institutional-grade Crypto Derivatives OS. It facilitates RFQ protocol integration for multi-leg spread execution, enabling high-fidelity execution, optimal price discovery, and capital efficiency in market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution.jpg)

## Total Cost of Ownership

Meaning ▴ Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) is a comprehensive financial metric that quantifies the direct and indirect costs associated with acquiring, operating, and maintaining a product or system throughout its entire lifecycle. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/price-anchoring/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A central toroidal structure and intricate core are bisected by two blades: one algorithmic with circuits, the other solid. This symbolizes an institutional digital asset derivatives platform, leveraging RFQ protocols for high-fidelity execution and price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-hub-integrating-algorithmic-intelligence-for-high-fidelity-price-discovery-and-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## Price Anchoring

Meaning ▴ Price Anchoring, in crypto market dynamics and negotiation, refers to the cognitive bias where an initial piece of information, typically a price, significantly influences subsequent judgments and valuations. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Reflective and circuit-patterned metallic discs symbolize the Prime RFQ powering institutional digital asset derivatives. This depicts deep market microstructure enabling high-fidelity execution through RFQ protocols, precise price discovery, and robust algorithmic trading within aggregated liquidity pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/prime-os-architecture-driving-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-for-optimal-liquidity-and-best-execution.jpg)

## Rfp Process

Meaning ▴ The RFP Process describes the structured sequence of activities an organization undertakes to solicit, evaluate, and ultimately select a vendor or service provider through the issuance of a Request for Proposal. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![An abstract composition featuring two overlapping digital asset liquidity pools, intersected by angular structures representing multi-leg RFQ protocols. This visualizes dynamic price discovery, high-fidelity execution, and aggregated liquidity within institutional-grade crypto derivatives OS, optimizing capital efficiency and mitigating counterparty risk](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-optimizing-aggregated-liquidity-and-multi-leg-execution-via-advanced-market-microstructure.jpg)

## Evaluation Process

Meaning ▴ The evaluation process, within the sophisticated architectural context of crypto investing, Request for Quote (RFQ) systems, and smart trading platforms, denotes the systematic and iterative assessment of potential trading opportunities, counterparty reliability, and execution performance against predefined criteria. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/best-value/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A luminous central hub, representing a dynamic liquidity pool, is bisected by two transparent, sharp-edged planes. This visualizes intersecting RFQ protocols and high-fidelity algorithmic execution within institutional digital asset derivatives market microstructure, enabling precise price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-protocols-microstructure-engine.jpg)

## Best Value

Meaning ▴ Best Value, in the context of crypto trading and institutional Request for Quote (RFQ) processes, represents the optimal combination of execution price, speed, certainty of fill, and overall transaction cost for an order. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/two-stage-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Sharp, intersecting elements, two light, two teal, on a reflective disc, centered by a precise mechanism. This visualizes institutional liquidity convergence for multi-leg options strategies in digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-block-trade-execution.jpg)

## Two-Stage Evaluation

Meaning ▴ Two-Stage Evaluation is a structured assessment process conducted in two distinct phases, where progression to the second stage is contingent upon successful completion of the first. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/procurement-strategy/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, segmented capsule, slightly ajar, embodies a secure RFQ protocol for institutional digital asset derivatives. It facilitates private quotation and high-fidelity execution of multi-leg spreads a blurred blue sphere signifies dynamic price discovery and atomic settlement within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-execution-3.jpg)

## Procurement Strategy

Meaning ▴ Procurement Strategy, in the context of a crypto-centric institution's systems architecture, represents the overarching, long-term plan guiding the acquisition of goods, services, and digital assets necessary for its operational success and competitive advantage. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/weighted-scoring/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A dark, transparent capsule, representing a principal's secure channel, is intersected by a sharp teal prism and an opaque beige plane. This illustrates institutional digital asset derivatives interacting with dynamic market microstructure and aggregated liquidity](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-market-microstructure.jpg)

## Weighted Scoring

Meaning ▴ Weighted Scoring, in the context of crypto investing and systems architecture, is a quantitative methodology used for evaluating and prioritizing various options, vendors, or investment opportunities by assigning differential importance (weights) to distinct criteria. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-simple-scoring-and-weighted-scoring-in-an-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Central blue-grey modular components precisely interconnect, flanked by two off-white units. This visualizes an institutional grade RFQ protocol hub, enabling high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-core-interconnect-for-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Weighted Scoring Framework

Simple scoring offers operational ease; weighted scoring provides strategic precision by prioritizing key criteria. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-simple-scoring-and-weighted-scoring-in-an-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, dark reflective sphere is precisely intersected by two flat, light-toned blades, creating an intricate cross-sectional design. This visually represents institutional digital asset derivatives' market microstructure, where RFQ protocols enable high-fidelity execution and price discovery within dark liquidity pools, ensuring capital efficiency and managing counterparty risk via advanced Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-market-microstructure.jpg)

## Scoring Framework

Simple scoring offers operational ease; weighted scoring provides strategic precision by prioritizing key criteria. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/scoring-rubric/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Precisely engineered abstract structure featuring translucent and opaque blades converging at a central hub. This embodies institutional RFQ protocol for digital asset derivatives, representing dynamic liquidity aggregation, high-fidelity execution, and complex multi-leg spread price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-multi-leg-execution-protocol.jpg)

## Scoring Rubric

Meaning ▴ A Scoring Rubric, within the operational framework of crypto institutional investing, is a precisely structured evaluation tool that delineates clear criteria and corresponding performance levels for rigorously assessing proposals, vendors, or internal projects related to critical digital asset infrastructure, advanced trading systems, or specialized service providers. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/vendor-selection/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Interconnected, sharp-edged geometric prisms on a dark surface reflect complex light. This embodies the intricate market microstructure of institutional digital asset derivatives, illustrating RFQ protocol aggregation for block trade execution, price discovery, and high-fidelity execution within a Principal's operational framework enabling optimal liquidity](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-geometric-prisms-reflecting-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-price-discovery-and-optimized-execution-market-microstructure.jpg)

## Vendor Selection

Meaning ▴ Vendor Selection, within the intricate domain of crypto investing and systems architecture, is the strategic, multi-faceted process of meticulously evaluating, choosing, and formally onboarding external technology providers, liquidity facilitators, or critical service partners. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-counterparty-performance-score-differ-from-a-traditional-credit-score/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Interlocked, precision-engineered spheres reveal complex internal gears, illustrating the intricate market microstructure and algorithmic trading of an institutional grade Crypto Derivatives OS. This visualizes high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives, embodying RFQ protocols and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-rfq-execution-system.jpg)

## Qualitative Score

A counterparty performance score is a dynamic, multi-factor model of transactional reliability, distinct from a traditional credit score's historical debt focus. </a>

**Tags:** [RFP Process](https://options.greeks.live/area/rfp-process/), [Scoring Rubric](https://options.greeks.live/area/scoring-rubric/), [RFP Scoring](https://options.greeks.live/area/rfp-scoring/), [Best Value Procurement](https://options.greeks.live/area/best-value-procurement/), [Weighted Scoring](https://options.greeks.live/area/weighted-scoring/), [Price Anchoring](https://options.greeks.live/area/price-anchoring/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [What Are the Most Critical Risk Categories to Include in an RFP Scoring Model?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-critical-risk-categories-to-include-in-an-rfp-scoring-model/)
![Sleek, speckled metallic fin extends from a layered base towards a light teal sphere. This depicts Prime RFQ facilitating digital asset derivatives trading. It embodies high-fidelity execution, algorithmic hedging, and market microstructure analysis. The sphere represents a liquidity pool optimized for RFQ protocols and price discovery.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-high-fidelity-execution-intelligence.jpg)

An RFP scoring model is a risk mitigation system that quantifies vendor capabilities to ensure strategic alignment.

- 
### [What Are the Most Critical Mistakes to Avoid When Designing an Rfp for a Technology Partner?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-critical-mistakes-to-avoid-when-designing-an-rfp-for-a-technology-partner/)
![A sleek, dark metallic surface features a cylindrical module with a luminous blue top, embodying a Prime RFQ control for RFQ protocol initiation. This institutional-grade interface enables high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives block trades, ensuring private quotation and atomic settlement.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-module-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

An RFP's success hinges on its function as a precise strategic blueprint, not a generic procurement checklist.

- 
### [How Do You Create an Effective and Objective Weighted Scoring Rubric for an Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-create-an-effective-and-objective-weighted-scoring-rubric-for-an-rfp/)
![A central engineered mechanism, resembling a Prime RFQ hub, anchors four precision arms. This symbolizes multi-leg spread execution and liquidity pool aggregation for RFQ protocols, enabling high-fidelity execution. Reflections suggest price discovery and atomic settlement in institutional digital asset derivatives.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-framework-enabling-multi-leg-spread-strategies-for-optimized-liquidity.jpg)

A weighted scoring rubric is a decision-making system that translates strategic priorities into a quantifiable, objective vendor evaluation framework.

- 
### [How Does the Structure of an RFP Influence the Quality and Comparability of Vendor Proposals?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-structure-of-an-rfp-influence-the-quality-and-comparability-of-vendor-proposals/)
![A multifaceted, luminous abstract structure against a dark void, symbolizing institutional digital asset derivatives market microstructure. Its sharp, reflective surfaces embody high-fidelity execution, RFQ protocol efficiency, and precise price discovery. This visual metaphor represents atomic settlement, capital efficiency, and robust counterparty risk management.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-protocol-architecture-optimizing-high-fidelity-rfq-execution-and-latent-liquidity-discovery.jpg)

A well-structured RFP acts as a calibrated system, engineering high-quality, comparable proposals by enforcing disciplined information exchange.

- 
### [How Can You Quantify Qualitative Aspects in an Rfp Evaluation without Introducing Bias?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-you-quantify-qualitative-aspects-in-an-rfp-evaluation-without-introducing-bias/)
![Parallel marked channels depict granular market microstructure across diverse institutional liquidity pools. A glowing cyan ring highlights an active Request for Quote RFQ for precise price discovery. A metallic probe signifies an algorithmic trading engine performing high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-high-fidelity-execution-3.jpg)

A structured rubric with anchored scales transforms subjective RFP data into objective, defensible metrics, mitigating bias.

- 
### [What Are the Most Common Forms of Cognitive Bias That Can Affect Rfp Scoring?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-forms-of-cognitive-bias-that-can-affect-rfp-scoring/)
![Glossy, intersecting forms in beige, blue, and teal embody RFQ protocol efficiency, atomic settlement, and aggregated liquidity for institutional digital asset derivatives. The sleek design reflects high-fidelity execution, prime brokerage capabilities, and optimized order book dynamics for capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/precision-engineered-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-via-optimized-rfq-protocols-enhancing-principal-operational-frameworks.jpg)

Cognitive biases are systemic flaws in human cognition that can distort RFP scoring, requiring a structured, bias-resistant evaluation architecture.

- 
### [What Is the Ideal Weight for Price in an Rfp Evaluation?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-ideal-weight-for-price-in-an-rfp-evaluation/)
![A balanced blue semi-sphere rests on a horizontal bar, poised above diagonal rails, reflecting its form below. This symbolizes the precise atomic settlement of a block trade within an RFQ protocol, showcasing high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency in institutional digital asset derivatives markets, managed by a Prime RFQ with minimal slippage.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-6.jpg)

The ideal price weight in an RFP evaluation balances cost with quality to achieve the best long-term value.

- 
### [What Are the Primary Risks of Assigning Too High a Weight to Price in an Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-risks-of-assigning-too-high-a-weight-to-price-in-an-rfp/)
![A precision sphere, an Execution Management System EMS, probes a Digital Asset Liquidity Pool. This signifies High-Fidelity Execution via Smart Order Routing for institutional-grade digital asset derivatives. It highlights Price Discovery and Pre-Trade Analytics within a Principal's Prime RFQ framework.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-rfq-engine-orchestrating-global-digital-asset-derivatives-liquidity-pool-price-discovery-and-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

Over-weighting price in an RFP systemically selects for low initial cost, risking higher lifecycle expenses and degraded operational quality.

- 
### [What Are the Most Common Mistakes to Avoid When Creating an Rfp Scoring System?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-mistakes-to-avoid-when-creating-an-rfp-scoring-system/)
![Precision-engineered institutional-grade Prime RFQ component, showcasing a reflective sphere and teal control. This symbolizes RFQ protocol mechanics, emphasizing high-fidelity execution, atomic settlement, and capital efficiency in digital asset derivatives market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-precision-execution-system-design.jpg)

An RFP scoring system's integrity is a function of its architectural design, not its arithmetic.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "How Can We Mitigate the Risk of &#8220;Low-Bid Bias&#8221; in Our Rfp Scoring?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-we-mitigate-the-risk-of-low-bid-bias-in-our-rfp-scoring/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-we-mitigate-the-risk-of-low-bid-bias-in-our-rfp-scoring/"
    },
    "headline": "How Can We Mitigate the Risk of \"Low-Bid Bias\" in Our Rfp Scoring? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "Mitigating low-bid bias requires architecting a two-stage evaluation that insulates qualitative scoring from price influence. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-we-mitigate-the-risk-of-low-bid-bias-in-our-rfp-scoring/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-09T16:16:07+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-10-30T14:49:14+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-multi-leg-execution-protocol.jpg",
        "caption": "A polished, abstract symmetrical object with four intersecting blades\u2014two opaque, two translucent\u2014converging at a central mechanism. This visualizes the core of a Prime RFQ for institutional digital asset derivatives, embodying intricate market microstructure. It facilitates best execution via advanced RFQ protocols, aggregating latent liquidity for multi-leg spreads, ensuring capital efficiency and atomic settlement within a robust principal framework."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Best Value",
        "Best Value Procurement",
        "Cognitive Bias in Procurement",
        "Evaluation Process",
        "Low-Bid Bias",
        "Price Anchoring",
        "Procurement Strategy",
        "RFP Process",
        "RFP Scoring",
        "Scoring Rubric",
        "Strategic Sourcing",
        "Total Cost of Ownership",
        "Two-Stage Evaluation",
        "Vendor Selection",
        "Weighted Scoring"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-we-mitigate-the-risk-of-low-bid-bias-in-our-rfp-scoring/
