# How Can You Quantify Subjective Factors like Vendor Fit in an RFP Scoring Model? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-08
**Categories:** Question

---

![A sleek, futuristic institutional grade platform with a translucent teal dome signifies a secure environment for private quotation and high-fidelity execution. A dark, reflective sphere represents an intelligence layer for algorithmic trading and price discovery within market microstructure, ensuring capital efficiency for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-rfq-execution-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-1.jpg)

![Sharp, intersecting elements, two light, two teal, on a reflective disc, centered by a precise mechanism. This visualizes institutional liquidity convergence for multi-leg options strategies in digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-block-trade-execution.jpg)

## Concept

The process of [quantifying subjective factors](https://prime.greeks.live/area/quantifying-subjective-factors/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) within a Request for Proposal (RFP) scoring model is an exercise in systemic design. It addresses the fundamental challenge of translating nuanced, qualitative human judgments into a structured, defensible, and uniform quantitative framework. The objective is to construct a reliable mechanism for decision-making that minimizes ambiguity and cognitive bias, ensuring that the final selection is the output of a logical process rather than an aggregation of disparate intuitions. This conversion is not about diminishing the value of qualitative assessment; it is about giving it a consistent and comparable voice in a multi-criteria evaluation.

At its core, the task involves deconstructing broad, abstract concepts like “[vendor fit](https://prime.greeks.live/area/vendor-fit/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)” or “[cultural alignment](https://prime.greeks.live/question/why-is-a-central-counterpartys-own-capital-contribution-considered-a-critical-incentive-alignment-tool/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)” into a hierarchy of observable, measurable attributes. A high-level subjective idea is broken down into its constituent components, each of which can be evaluated against a predefined scale. This method transforms an inherently abstract judgment into a series of concrete assessments.

The power of this approach lies in its ability to create a common language and a shared understanding among evaluators, forcing a granular and disciplined review of each proposal. The result is a system where subjective inputs are processed through a standardized analytical lens, producing quantitative outputs that can be weighted and aggregated logically.

> The fundamental goal is to build a transparent bridge between qualitative perception and quantitative comparison, making the decision-making process both auditable and robust.

This disciplined conversion relies on established decision-science techniques. Methodologies such as the [Analytic Hierarchy Process](https://prime.greeks.live/area/analytic-hierarchy-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) ([AHP](https://prime.greeks.live/area/ahp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)) provide a formal structure for this decomposition and evaluation. AHP, for instance, uses paired comparisons to establish the relative importance of different criteria, both quantitative and qualitative. Evaluators are asked to judge which of two criteria is more important for the project’s success, and by how much.

This process is repeated for all criteria and then for all vendors against each criterion. Such a framework converts subjective preferences into a mathematically coherent set of weights and scores, providing a clear rationale for the final ranking. The system’s integrity comes from its structure, its predefined rules, and the clarity of its evaluation standards.

![A central metallic mechanism, representing a core RFQ Engine, is encircled by four teal translucent panels. These symbolize Structured Liquidity Access across Liquidity Pools, enabling High-Fidelity Execution for Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/inst-dad-rfq-hifi-ex-prime-os-quant-algo-liquidity.jpg)

![An abstract, multi-component digital infrastructure with a central lens and circuit patterns, embodying an Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives platform. This Prime RFQ enables High-Fidelity Execution via RFQ Protocol, optimizing Market Microstructure for Algorithmic Trading, Price Discovery, and Multi-Leg Spread](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-grade-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-platform-powering-high-fidelity-execution-via-advanced-rfq-protocol-prime-os-intelligence-layer.jpg)

## Strategy

Developing a strategy to quantify [subjective factors](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-objectively-score-subjective-qualitative-factors-in-an-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) requires the design of a robust evaluation architecture. This architecture must be capable of capturing the complexity of qualitative judgments while imposing the rigor of a quantitative system. The strategic imperative is to create a process that is transparent, repeatable, and defensible. This begins with the careful deconstruction of subjective criteria and the development of precise measurement instruments.

![A blue speckled marble, symbolizing a precise block trade, rests centrally on a translucent bar, representing a robust RFQ protocol. This structured geometric arrangement illustrates complex market microstructure, enabling high-fidelity execution, optimal price discovery, and efficient liquidity aggregation within a principal's operational framework for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-institutional-rfq-execution-framework-optimizing-digital-asset-derivatives-liquidity-aggregation-across-complex-market-microstructure.jpg)

## Deconstructing Ambiguity into Measurable Components

A concept like “Vendor Fit” is too broad to be scored directly. The initial strategic step is to break it down into a set of distinct, observable sub-criteria. This process moves the evaluation from the abstract to the concrete. Each sub-criterion should represent a specific dimension of the overarching subjective factor.

- 
**Cultural Alignment** ▴ This can be broken down into components like ‘Shared Communication Norms’, ‘Approach to Partnership and Collaboration’, and ‘Alignment on Business Ethics and Values’. Each of these is more directly observable than the parent concept.

- 
**[Strategic Partnership Potential](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-measure-the-roi-of-a-strategic-vendor-partnership-from-an-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)** ▴ This might be deconstructed into ‘Proactiveness in Problem Solving’, ‘Willingness to Invest in the Relationship’, and ‘Long-Term Vision Alignment’.

- 
**Team and Personnel Quality** ▴ This could include ‘Expertise and Experience of Key Personnel’, ‘Clarity and Professionalism in Communication’, and ‘Accessibility and Responsiveness of the Proposed Team’.

By dissecting the primary subjective factor, the evaluation team creates a detailed rubric that guides the assessment, ensuring all vendors are judged against the same granular attributes.

![Precision-engineered institutional grade components, representing prime brokerage infrastructure, intersect via a translucent teal bar embodying a high-fidelity execution RFQ protocol. This depicts seamless liquidity aggregation and atomic settlement for digital asset derivatives, reflecting complex market microstructure and efficient price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-prime-os-core.jpg)

## Building the Measurement Instrument the Anchored Scoring Scale

Once the sub-criteria are defined, the next strategic step is to create the tool for measurement. A simple 1-to-5 numerical scale is insufficient because one evaluator’s “4” can be another’s “3”. The solution is an [anchored scoring scale](https://prime.greeks.live/area/anchored-scoring-scale/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), which provides explicit, descriptive definitions for each point on the scale. These anchors translate numerical scores into clear, behavioral examples, calibrating the entire evaluation team to a single standard.

> An anchored scale ensures that scores are assigned based on evidence described in the proposal, not on an evaluator’s internal, uncalibrated feeling.

The table below provides an example of an anchored [scoring scale](https://prime.greeks.live/area/scoring-scale/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) for the sub-criterion “Proactiveness in Problem Solving.”

| Score | Descriptor | Behavioral Anchor (Evidence to Look For) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | Reactive | The proposal only addresses problems explicitly raised in the RFP. There is no evidence of anticipating future challenges or offering preventative solutions. The approach is entirely passive. |
| 2 | Limited Proactiveness | The proposal acknowledges potential issues but offers generic, non-specific solutions. It identifies risks but lacks a detailed mitigation plan tailored to our context. |
| 3 | Proactive | The proposal identifies specific potential problems and offers clear, well-defined solutions. It demonstrates an understanding of our project’s unique challenges and outlines a credible plan to address them. |
| 4 | Highly Proactive | The proposal not only identifies problems and solutions but also presents alternative strategies and contingency plans. It shows evidence of thinking several steps ahead and planning for multiple scenarios. |
| 5 | Strategic Proactiveness | The proposal reframes potential problems as opportunities. It offers innovative solutions that could add value beyond the original scope of the RFP and demonstrates a deep strategic understanding of our long-term goals. |

![A dark, precision-engineered module with raised circular elements integrates with a smooth beige housing. It signifies high-fidelity execution for institutional RFQ protocols, ensuring robust price discovery and capital efficiency in digital asset derivatives market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-system-core-high-speed-price-discovery-module.jpg)

## Strategic Weighting Using Paired Comparison

Not all criteria are of equal importance. The final strategic element is to assign weights to each criterion to reflect the organization’s priorities. The [Analytic Hierarchy](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-analytic-hierarchy-process-improve-objectivity-in-kpi-weighting/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) Process (AHP) offers a structured method for this through [paired comparison](https://prime.greeks.live/area/paired-comparison/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite).

Evaluators compare every possible pair of criteria and decide which is more important. This forces a disciplined trade-off, creating a more robust and defensible weighting scheme than simply assigning percentages based on gut feeling.

For example, an evaluator might be asked:

- Between ‘Cultural Alignment’ and ‘Technical Skill’, which is more critical for this project’s success?

- Between ‘Price’ and ‘Strategic Partnership Potential’, which holds more weight for our long-term objectives?

The results of these comparisons are synthesized mathematically to produce a set of priority weights for all criteria. This ensures that the final score accurately reflects the stated priorities of the organization.

![A central luminous, teal-ringed aperture anchors this abstract, symmetrical composition, symbolizing an Institutional Grade Prime RFQ Intelligence Layer for Digital Asset Derivatives. Overlapping transparent planes signify intricate Market Microstructure and Liquidity Aggregation, facilitating High-Fidelity Execution via Automated RFQ protocols for optimal Price Discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-prime-os-intelligence-layer.jpg)

![A futuristic, metallic structure with reflective surfaces and a central optical mechanism, symbolizing a robust Prime RFQ for institutional digital asset derivatives. It enables high-fidelity execution of RFQ protocols, optimizing price discovery and liquidity aggregation across diverse liquidity pools with minimal slippage](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-platform-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-optimized-execution-management-system-with-robust-liquidity-sourcing.jpg)

## Execution

The execution phase translates the strategic framework into a rigorous, operational protocol. This is where the system for quantification is built and implemented, moving from design to data-driven decision-making. The process must be methodical, with clear steps for data collection, normalization, and analysis to ensure the integrity of the final output.

![A precise geometric prism reflects on a dark, structured surface, symbolizing institutional digital asset derivatives market microstructure. This visualizes block trade execution and price discovery for multi-leg spreads via RFQ protocols, ensuring high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency within Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-precision-execution.jpg)

## The Operational Protocol for Evaluation

A successful execution hinges on a disciplined, multi-stage process that ensures consistency and fairness among all evaluators and proposals. This protocol functions as the operating system for the entire evaluation.

- 
**[Evaluator Calibration](https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluator-calibration/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) Session** ▴ Before any proposals are reviewed, all members of the scoring committee must participate in a calibration workshop. During this session, the scoring rubric and anchored scales are reviewed in detail. The team discusses the meaning of each anchor to build a shared, consistent interpretation. A sample or mock proposal might be scored collectively to surface any differences in interpretation and resolve them before the live evaluation begins.

- 
**Independent Initial Scoring** ▴ Each evaluator must score every proposal independently. This is critical to prevent groupthink and to ensure that the initial data set represents a collection of unbiased individual judgments. Evaluators should be required to provide a brief written justification for any scores given, referencing specific evidence from the proposal that aligns with the chosen anchor on the scale.

- 
**Data Aggregation and Normalization** ▴ Once individual scores are submitted, they are aggregated into a central database. At this stage, a critical step is to analyze the scoring patterns of each evaluator. Some individuals may consistently score higher or lower than their peers. To correct for this “scorer bias,” scores can be normalized. A common method is to calculate a z-score for each rating, which re-expresses the score in terms of how many standard deviations it is from that specific evaluator’s mean score. This levels the playing field, ensuring that a “5” from a tough scorer is given appropriate weight relative to a “5” from a more lenient one.

- 
**Consensus and Anomaly Review** ▴ The normalized scores are compiled, and the committee reconvenes to review the results. The discussion should focus on areas with high variance ▴ where evaluators had significant disagreements. The justifications provided during the independent scoring phase become invaluable here, allowing the team to understand the reasoning behind different scores and reach a reasoned consensus on a final score for that criterion.

![Precision instruments, resembling calibration tools, intersect over a central geared mechanism. This metaphor illustrates the intricate market microstructure and price discovery for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-engine-microstructure-analytics.jpg)

## Quantitative Modeling the Master Scoring Matrix

The core of the execution phase is the master scoring matrix. This is the comprehensive data model where all inputs are processed to generate the final vendor ranking. The table below illustrates a simplified version of such a matrix, incorporating raw scores, normalized scores, criterion weights (derived from a process like AHP), and the final weighted scores.

In this model, the [Weighted Score](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-counterparty-performance-score-differ-from-a-traditional-credit-score/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) for each criterion is calculated as ▴ Normalized Score × Criterion Weight. The Total Vendor Score is the sum of all its weighted scores.

| Evaluation Criteria | Criterion Weight | Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor C | Norm. Score | Weighted Score | Norm. Score | Weighted Score | Norm. Score | Weighted Score |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |

> The master matrix serves as the single source of truth for the evaluation, transparently documenting the logical path from individual judgment to the final, data-supported recommendation.

![Precision-engineered institutional-grade Prime RFQ component, showcasing a reflective sphere and teal control. This symbolizes RFQ protocol mechanics, emphasizing high-fidelity execution, atomic settlement, and capital efficiency in digital asset derivatives market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-precision-execution-system-design.jpg)

## Validating the Model through Sensitivity Analysis

A robust system must be tested under stress. The final step in execution is to perform a [sensitivity analysis](https://prime.greeks.live/area/sensitivity-analysis/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) on the model. This involves systematically altering the weights of the subjective criteria to see how it impacts the final vendor ranking. For example, what if ‘Cultural Alignment’ was weighted at 20% instead of 15%?

Would the winning vendor change? This analysis reveals how sensitive the outcome is to the initial weighting assumptions. If the top-ranked vendor remains the winner across a range of different weighting scenarios, it provides a high degree of confidence in the decision’s robustness. If the winner changes with only a minor tweak to the weights, it signals that the top vendors are very closely matched and may warrant further, more focused due diligence on the most sensitive criteria.

![Abstract spheres and a translucent flow visualize institutional digital asset derivatives market microstructure. It depicts robust RFQ protocol execution, high-fidelity data flow, and seamless liquidity aggregation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-market-microstructure-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-leveraging-rfq-protocols-and-atomic-settlement-across-prime-os.jpg)

## References

- Saaty, Thomas L. _The Analytic Hierarchy Process ▴ Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation_. McGraw-Hill, 1980.

- Sandelowski, Margarete, et al. “On Quantitizing.” _Journal of Mixed Methods Research_, vol. 3, no. 3, 2009, pp. 208-222.

- Ghodsypour, S.H. and C. O’Brien. “A decision support system for supplier selection using a combined analytic hierarchy process and linear programming.” _International Journal of Production Economics_, vol. 56-57, 1998, pp. 199-212.

- Teddlie, Charles, and Abbas Tashakkori. “Major issues and controversies in the use of mixed methods in the social and behavioral sciences.” _Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research_, 2003, pp. 3-50.

- Hsieh, Hsiu-Fang, and Sarah E. Shannon. “Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.” _Qualitative Health Research_, vol. 15, no. 9, 2005, pp. 1277-1288.

- Ho, William, et al. “Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection ▴ A literature review.” _European Journal of Operational Research_, vol. 202, no. 1, 2010, pp. 16-24.

- Boyatzis, Richard E. _Transforming qualitative information ▴ Thematic analysis and code development_. Sage, 1998.

- Vargas, Luis G. “An overview of the analytic hierarchy process and its applications.” _European Journal of Operational Research_, vol. 48, no. 1, 1990, pp. 2-8.

![A sophisticated mechanical system featuring a translucent, crystalline blade-like component, embodying a Prime RFQ for Digital Asset Derivatives. This visualizes high-fidelity execution of RFQ protocols, demonstrating aggregated inquiry and price discovery within market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system-microstructure-1.jpg)

## Reflection

![A complex, reflective apparatus with concentric rings and metallic arms supporting two distinct spheres. This embodies RFQ protocols, market microstructure, and high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-3.jpg)

## Beyond the Score a System for Decision Intelligence

The construction of a quantitative scoring model for subjective factors is more than a procurement tactic; it is the development of a core organizational capability. The true value of this system is not located in a single vendor selection but in its capacity to be refined and redeployed over time. Each RFP cycle becomes an opportunity to calibrate the model, to sharpen the definitions of the anchored scales, and to adjust criteria weighting in response to past outcomes. The framework itself becomes an asset, a piece of institutional intelligence that grows more precise with each application.

Viewing this model as a dynamic system for decision intelligence shifts the perspective. The goal moves from simply picking a vendor to continuously improving the process of how vendors are selected. The data generated ▴ not just the final scores, but the records of evaluator disagreements, the results of sensitivity analyses, and the post-project performance of chosen vendors ▴ becomes a feedback loop.

This loop informs the next iteration of the system, creating a learning organization that makes progressively more sophisticated and well-supported capital allocation and partnership decisions. The ultimate output is not a number, but confidence in the logic of the choice.

![A translucent blue sphere is precisely centered within beige, dark, and teal channels. This depicts RFQ protocol for digital asset derivatives, enabling high-fidelity execution of a block trade within a controlled market microstructure, ensuring atomic settlement and price discovery on a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-execution-pathway-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-leveraging-rfq-protocols-and-high-fidelity-market-microstructure.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/quantifying-subjective-factors/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Interconnected, sharp-edged geometric prisms on a dark surface reflect complex light. This embodies the intricate market microstructure of institutional digital asset derivatives, illustrating RFQ protocol aggregation for block trade execution, price discovery, and high-fidelity execution within a Principal's operational framework enabling optimal liquidity](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-geometric-prisms-reflecting-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-price-discovery-and-optimized-execution-market-microstructure.jpg)

## Quantifying Subjective Factors

Meaning ▴ Quantifying Subjective Factors involves the systematic translation of qualitative assessments, expert opinions, and human perceptions into measurable, numerical data points for integration into quantitative models and automated systems. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/why-is-a-central-counterpartys-own-capital-contribution-considered-a-critical-incentive-alignment-tool/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A glossy, segmented sphere with a luminous blue 'X' core represents a Principal's Prime RFQ. It highlights multi-dealer RFQ protocols, high-fidelity execution, and atomic settlement for institutional digital asset derivatives, signifying unified liquidity pools, market microstructure, and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/prime-os-core-for-best-rfq-digital-asset-derivatives-institutional-trade-flow.jpg)

## Cultural Alignment

A central counterparty's capital contribution is the architectural keystone ensuring its risk management incentives are aligned with market stability. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/vendor-fit/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Precision metallic mechanism with a central translucent sphere, embodying institutional RFQ protocols for digital asset derivatives. This core represents high-fidelity execution within a Prime RFQ, optimizing price discovery and liquidity aggregation for block trades, ensuring capital efficiency and atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-prime-os-execution-hub.jpg)

## Vendor Fit

Meaning ▴ Vendor Fit represents the precise congruence between an institutional principal's strategic objectives, operational workflows, and technical infrastructure requirements, and a technology provider's specific capabilities, architectural design, and service delivery model. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/analytic-hierarchy-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, institutional grade apparatus, central to a Crypto Derivatives OS, showcases high-fidelity execution. Its RFQ protocol channels extend to a stylized liquidity pool, enabling price discovery across complex market microstructure for capital efficiency within a Principal's operational framework](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-rfq-digital-derivatives-prime-os-microstructure-optimization.jpg)

## Analytic Hierarchy Process

Meaning ▴ The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) constitutes a structured methodology for organizing and analyzing complex decision problems, particularly those involving multiple, often conflicting, criteria and subjective judgments. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/ahp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sophisticated metallic mechanism with integrated translucent teal pathways on a dark background. This abstract visualizes the intricate market microstructure of an institutional digital asset derivatives platform, specifically the RFQ engine facilitating private quotation and block trade execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/systemic-framework-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-price-discovery-and-atomic-settlement.jpg)

## Ahp

Meaning ▴ The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) constitutes a structured decision-making framework, systematically organizing complex problems into a hierarchical structure of goals, criteria, and alternatives. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-objectively-score-subjective-qualitative-factors-in-an-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![The abstract visual depicts a sophisticated, transparent execution engine showcasing market microstructure for institutional digital asset derivatives. Its central matching engine facilitates RFQ protocol execution, revealing internal algorithmic trading logic and high-fidelity execution pathways](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-rfq-engine-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

## Subjective Factors

A Decision Calibration System translates subjective inputs into objective, weighted scores, ensuring a defensible, strategy-aligned RFP outcome. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-measure-the-roi-of-a-strategic-vendor-partnership-from-an-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Two semi-transparent, curved elements, one blueish, one greenish, are centrally connected, symbolizing dynamic institutional RFQ protocols. This configuration suggests aggregated liquidity pools and multi-leg spread constructions](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-price-discovery-engine.jpg)

## Strategic Partnership Potential

Measuring vendor partnership ROI is a systemic quantification of total value delivered against the total cost of ownership. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/anchored-scoring-scale/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Intersecting metallic structures symbolize RFQ protocol pathways for institutional digital asset derivatives. They represent high-fidelity execution of multi-leg spreads across diverse liquidity pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-framework-optimizing-multi-leg-spreads-and-liquidity-aggregation-for-best-execution.jpg)

## Anchored Scoring Scale

Meaning ▴ An Anchored Scoring Scale constitutes a structured evaluative framework that assigns quantitative or qualitative scores to specific attributes or performance metrics by referencing predefined, explicit benchmarks or exemplars, ensuring a high degree of consistency and objectivity in assessment. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/scoring-scale/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract dual-cone object reflects RFQ Protocol dynamism. It signifies robust Liquidity Aggregation, High-Fidelity Execution, and Principal-to-Principal negotiation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-grade-rfq-execution-framework-for-digital-asset-derivatives-optimal-liquidity-aggregation-and-atomic-settlement.jpg)

## Scoring Scale

Meaning ▴ A Scoring Scale represents a structured quantitative framework engineered to assign numerical values or ranks to discrete entities, conditions, or behaviors based on a predefined set of weighted criteria, thereby facilitating objective evaluation and systematic decision-making within complex operational environments. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-analytic-hierarchy-process-improve-objectivity-in-kpi-weighting/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sophisticated digital asset derivatives RFQ engine's core components are depicted, showcasing precise market microstructure for optimal price discovery. Its central hub facilitates algorithmic trading, ensuring high-fidelity execution across multi-leg spreads](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimizing-multi-leg-spreads-for-optimal-capital-efficiency.jpg)

## Analytic Hierarchy

The Analytic Hierarchy Process improves objectivity by structuring decisions and using pairwise comparisons to create transparent, consistent KPI weights. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/paired-comparison/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A futuristic system component with a split design and intricate central element, embodying advanced RFQ protocols. This visualizes high-fidelity execution, precise price discovery, and granular market microstructure control for institutional digital asset derivatives, optimizing liquidity provision and minimizing slippage](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/advanced-rfq-protocols-for-digital-asset-derivatives-price-discovery.jpg)

## Paired Comparison

Meaning ▴ Paired Comparison is a systematic method for eliciting preferences or relative values by presenting two items from a set at a time and requiring a choice or a statement of preference between them. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluator-calibration/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Sleek metallic components with teal luminescence precisely intersect, symbolizing an institutional-grade Prime RFQ. This represents multi-leg spread execution for digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols, ensuring high-fidelity execution, optimal price discovery, and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-best-execution-system.jpg)

## Evaluator Calibration

Meaning ▴ Evaluator Calibration defines the systematic process of adjusting and refining the parameters and weighting schemes of an algorithmic evaluation system. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-counterparty-performance-score-differ-from-a-traditional-credit-score/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sophisticated proprietary system module featuring precision-engineered components, symbolizing an institutional-grade Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives. Its intricate design represents market microstructure analysis, RFQ protocol integration, and high-fidelity execution capabilities, optimizing liquidity aggregation and price discovery for block trades within a multi-leg spread environment](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-proprietary-architecture-driving-high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-via-rfq-protocols-and-optimized-market-microstructure-dynamics.jpg)

## Weighted Score

A counterparty performance score is a dynamic, multi-factor model of transactional reliability, distinct from a traditional credit score's historical debt focus. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/sensitivity-analysis/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Mirrored abstract components with glowing indicators, linked by an articulated mechanism, depict an institutional grade Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives. This visualizes RFQ protocol driven high-fidelity execution, price discovery, and atomic settlement across market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-rfq-high-fidelity-execution-microstructure.jpg)

## Sensitivity Analysis

Meaning ▴ Sensitivity Analysis quantifies the impact of changes in independent variables on a dependent output, providing a precise measure of model responsiveness to input perturbations. </a>

**Tags:** [Qualitative Data Conversion](https://options.greeks.live/area/qualitative-data-conversion/), [Evaluator Calibration](https://options.greeks.live/area/evaluator-calibration/), [Sensitivity Analysis](https://options.greeks.live/area/sensitivity-analysis/), [AHP](https://options.greeks.live/area/ahp/), [Scoring Scale](https://options.greeks.live/area/scoring-scale/), [Weighted Scoring](https://options.greeks.live/area/weighted-scoring/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [What Are the Most Critical Kpis to Include in a Service-Based Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-critical-kpis-to-include-in-a-service-based-rfp/)
![A sleek, dark metallic surface features a cylindrical module with a luminous blue top, embodying a Prime RFQ control for RFQ protocol initiation. This institutional-grade interface enables high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives block trades, ensuring private quotation and atomic settlement.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-module-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

A service-based RFP's critical KPIs translate strategic intent into an enforceable system of outsourced operational control.

- 
### [How Can You Quantify Qualitative Criteria in an Rfp Evaluation?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-you-quantify-qualitative-criteria-in-an-rfp-evaluation/)
![A crystalline geometric structure, symbolizing precise price discovery and high-fidelity execution, rests upon an intricate market microstructure framework. This visual metaphor illustrates the Prime RFQ facilitating institutional digital asset derivatives trading, including Bitcoin options and Ethereum futures, through RFQ protocols for block trades with minimal slippage.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

Quantifying qualitative RFP criteria translates subjective value into a structured, defensible decision-making system.

- 
### [Why Is a Sensitivity Analysis Important in Validating an RFP Scoring Model’s Results?](https://options.greeks.live/question/why-is-a-sensitivity-analysis-important-in-validating-an-rfp-scoring-models-results/)
![A translucent sphere with intricate metallic rings, an 'intelligence layer' core, is bisected by a sleek, reflective blade. This visual embodies an 'institutional grade' 'Prime RFQ' enabling 'high-fidelity execution' of 'digital asset derivatives' via 'private quotation' and 'RFQ protocols', optimizing 'capital efficiency' and 'market microstructure' for 'block trade' operations.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-rfq-engine-for-digital-asset-derivatives-best-execution.jpg)

A sensitivity analysis validates an RFP scoring model by stress-testing its assumptions to ensure the final result is a stable, defensible decision.

- 
### [How Do You Effectively Weight Rfp Evaluation Criteria to Reflect True Project Priorities?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-effectively-weight-rfp-evaluation-criteria-to-reflect-true-project-priorities/)
![A meticulously engineered mechanism showcases a blue and grey striped block, representing a structured digital asset derivative, precisely engaged by a metallic tool. This setup illustrates high-fidelity execution within a controlled RFQ environment, optimizing block trade settlement and managing counterparty risk through robust market microstructure. It highlights a Prime RFQ intelligence layer.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution.jpg)

A structured RFP weighting system translates strategic priorities into a quantitative, defensible vendor selection framework.

- 
### [How Can Weighted Scoring in an Rfp Align Vendor Selection with Core Business Objectives?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-weighted-scoring-in-an-rfp-align-vendor-selection-with-core-business-objectives/)
![An Institutional Grade RFQ Engine core for Digital Asset Derivatives. This Prime RFQ Intelligence Layer ensures High-Fidelity Execution, driving Optimal Price Discovery and Atomic Settlement for Aggregated Inquiries.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-core-high-fidelity.jpg)

Weighted scoring aligns vendor selection with business objectives by translating strategic priorities into a quantitative evaluation framework.

- 
### [How Can You Effectively Weight Non-Financial Criteria in an Rfp Scoring Matrix?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-you-effectively-weight-non-financial-criteria-in-an-rfp-scoring-matrix/)
![An intricate mechanical assembly reveals the market microstructure of an institutional-grade RFQ protocol engine. It visualizes high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives block trades, managing counterparty risk and multi-leg spread strategies within a liquidity pool, embodying a Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-architecture.jpg)

Weighting non-financial RFP criteria translates strategic priorities into a quantitative, defensible vendor selection system.

- 
### [How Does the Weighting of Non-Price Criteria in an RFP Influence Supplier Innovation?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-weighting-of-non-price-criteria-in-an-rfp-influence-supplier-innovation/)
![Abstract geometric planes in teal, navy, and grey intersect. A central beige object, symbolizing a precise RFQ inquiry, passes through a teal anchor, representing High-Fidelity Execution within Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives. This depicts optimal Price Discovery and Liquidity Aggregation.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/rfq-protocols-for-digital-asset-derivatives-high-fidelity-execution-liquidity-aggregation-price-discovery-market-microstructure.jpg)

The weighting of non-price criteria in an RFP directly influences supplier innovation by shifting the competitive focus from cost to value, incentivizing creative and superior solutions.

- 
### [How Do You Objectively Score and Compare Complex Rfp Responses?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-objectively-score-and-compare-complex-rfp-responses/)
![A dark, articulated multi-leg spread structure crosses a simpler underlying asset bar on a teal Prime RFQ platform. This visualizes institutional digital asset derivatives execution, leveraging high-fidelity RFQ protocols for optimal capital efficiency and precise price discovery.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-prime-os-execution.jpg)

Objective RFP scoring requires a weighted evaluation system that translates strategic priorities into a defensible, data-driven decision.

- 
### [What Is the Optimal Weight Distribution between Price and Qualitative Factors in a Strategic RFP?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-optimal-weight-distribution-between-price-and-qualitative-factors-in-a-strategic-rfp/)
![Intersecting opaque and luminous teal structures symbolize converging RFQ protocols for multi-leg spread execution. Surface droplets denote market microstructure granularity and slippage. This represents high-fidelity execution of institutional digital asset derivatives, optimizing price discovery and minimizing latency in dark pool environments.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/rfq-protocols-for-digital-asset-derivatives-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

The optimal RFP weight distribution is a dynamic calibration reflecting the procurement's strategic value and risk profile.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "How Can You Quantify Subjective Factors like Vendor Fit in an RFP Scoring Model?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-you-quantify-subjective-factors-like-vendor-fit-in-an-rfp-scoring-model/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-you-quantify-subjective-factors-like-vendor-fit-in-an-rfp-scoring-model/"
    },
    "headline": "How Can You Quantify Subjective Factors like Vendor Fit in an RFP Scoring Model? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "Quantifying subjectivity in RFPs is a system design process that translates qualitative judgments into a structured, defensible, and uniform quantitative framework. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-you-quantify-subjective-factors-like-vendor-fit-in-an-rfp-scoring-model/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-08T14:55:03+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-08-08T14:55:09+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-prime-os-execution-hub.jpg",
        "caption": "A robust, industrial-grade mechanism with a central glowing orb, symbolizing the intelligence layer of a Prime RFQ for institutional digital asset derivatives. It depicts intricate market microstructure and RFQ protocols essential for high-fidelity execution of block trades, facilitating price discovery and liquidity aggregation. The design reflects a system engineered for capital efficiency, mitigating systemic risk through advanced quantitative analysis and ensuring best execution across complex multi-leg spreads and implied volatility surfaces."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "AHP",
        "Analytic Hierarchy Process",
        "Anchored Scoring Scale",
        "Decision Science",
        "Evaluator Calibration",
        "Paired Comparison",
        "Procurement Strategy",
        "Qualitative Data Conversion",
        "Quantifying Subjective Factors",
        "RFP Scoring Model",
        "Scoring Scale",
        "Sensitivity Analysis",
        "Vendor Fit",
        "Vendor Selection Criteria",
        "Weighted Scoring"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-you-quantify-subjective-factors-like-vendor-fit-in-an-rfp-scoring-model/
