# How Did MiFID II's Best Execution Requirements Change Counterparty Selection for RFQs? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-07
**Categories:** Question

---

![A fractured, polished disc with a central, sharp conical element symbolizes fragmented digital asset liquidity. This Principal RFQ engine ensures high-fidelity execution, precise price discovery, and atomic settlement within complex market microstructure, optimizing capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-rfq-engine-unifying-fragmented-digital-asset-derivatives-liquidity-for-best-execution.jpg)

![Modular, metallic components interconnected by glowing green channels represent a robust Principal's operational framework for institutional digital asset derivatives. This signifies active low-latency data flow, critical for high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement via RFQ protocols across diverse liquidity pools, ensuring optimal price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Concept

The implementation of the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) represented a fundamental re-architecting of the European financial markets’ regulatory landscape. Its arrival compelled a systemic shift in how [investment firms](https://prime.greeks.live/area/investment-firms/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) approach their operational duties, particularly the obligation of best execution. For protocols like the [Request for Quote](https://prime.greeks.live/area/request-for-quote/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (RFQ), which had long operated on a foundation of established relationships and bilateral negotiations, the change was profound.

The directive moved the needle from a qualitative, relationship-centric model to a quantitative, evidence-based framework. It mandated that firms take “all sufficient steps” to obtain the best possible result for their clients, a significant tightening from the previous “all reasonable steps” standard under MiFID I. This seemingly subtle change in language carried immense weight, effectively transforming a guideline into a rigorous, auditable process.

Before MiFID II, [counterparty selection](https://prime.greeks.live/area/counterparty-selection/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) within an RFQ workflow was often a function of habit, convenience, and long-standing dealer relationships. A trader might send a request to a handful of trusted [liquidity providers](https://prime.greeks.live/area/liquidity-providers/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) based on historical precedent and a qualitative sense of their reliability. While price was always a consideration, the process lacked a formal, data-driven structure for evaluating execution quality across a comprehensive set of factors. The system was built on trust and familiarity, which, while valuable, did not always produce a demonstrably optimal outcome for the end client.

Information asymmetries were common, and the ability to prove that a particular execution was the best possible result was limited. The process was, in essence, an art form guided by experience.

> MiFID II introduced a mandate for a systematic and evidence-based approach to best execution, fundamentally altering the dynamics of counterparty selection in RFQ markets.

[MiFID II](https://prime.greeks.live/area/mifid-ii/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) dismantled this paradigm by codifying a set of explicit [execution factors](https://prime.greeks.live/area/execution-factors/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) that firms must consider. These factors extend well beyond the headline price to include costs, speed, likelihood of execution and settlement, size, nature of the order, and any other relevant consideration. This multi-dimensional requirement meant that simply choosing the counterparty offering the best price was no longer sufficient. A firm now had to build a defensible, data-backed process to justify its counterparty selection.

It needed to demonstrate, with empirical evidence, why a particular set of liquidity providers was chosen for an RFQ and how that choice contributed to the best possible outcome for the client. This necessitated a complete overhaul of internal processes, demanding a new level of transparency, [data capture](https://prime.greeks.live/area/data-capture/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), and analytical rigor. The art of counterparty selection had to evolve into a science, supported by a robust technological and operational framework.

![Transparent conduits and metallic components abstractly depict institutional digital asset derivatives trading. Symbolizing cross-protocol RFQ execution, multi-leg spreads, and high-fidelity atomic settlement across aggregated liquidity pools, it reflects prime brokerage infrastructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/cross-protocol-rfq-execution-digital-asset-derivatives-microstructure-system.jpg)

## The New Execution Calculus

The core of the change introduced by MiFID II lies in the elevation of process and evidence over simple outcomes. The directive is less concerned with whether a single trade achieved the best possible price in hindsight and more focused on whether the firm has a consistently applied, high-quality process designed to achieve that result. For RFQ workflows, this meant that the selection of counterparties to whom a quote request is sent became a critical, auditable step in the execution process.

Investment firms were now required to have a clear, documented [order execution policy](https://prime.greeks.live/area/order-execution-policy/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) that outlines how they select execution venues and counterparties. This policy could no longer be a static document; it had to be a living framework, continuously monitored and updated based on performance data.

This new calculus forced firms to ask difficult questions about their existing relationships. Was a long-standing counterparty still competitive when evaluated against the full range of MiFID II execution factors? Did they respond to RFQs in a timely manner? What was their fill ratio?

How did their quoted prices compare to a broader market composite, even in less transparent asset classes? Answering these questions required data, and collecting that data required a significant investment in technology. The informal, phone-based or chat-based RFQ processes of the past were ill-suited to this new reality. The market needed electronic trading platforms that could capture every stage of the RFQ lifecycle, from the initial request to the final execution, timestamping each interaction and logging every quote received. This data became the raw material for the new, evidence-based approach to counterparty selection.

![Precision-engineered modular components display a central control, data input panel, and numerical values on cylindrical elements. This signifies an institutional Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives, enabling RFQ protocol aggregation, high-fidelity execution, algorithmic price discovery, and volatility surface calibration for portfolio margin](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/firm-fx-options-rfq-trade-system-key-microstructure-data-flow-core-engine.jpg)

## From Legitimate Reliance to Systematic Proof

A crucial aspect of the pre-MiFID II environment, particularly for firms acting as principals in RFQ markets, was the concept of “legitimate reliance.” [Best execution](https://prime.greeks.live/area/best-execution/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) obligations were often considered to apply only when a client had a legitimate expectation that the firm would protect their interests. This was determined by a four-fold test considering factors like who initiated the transaction and the relative market transparency. MiFID II did not eliminate this concept, but its emphasis on taking “all sufficient steps” and the associated reporting requirements under [Regulatory Technical Standards](https://prime.greeks.live/area/regulatory-technical-standards/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (RTS) 27 and 28 effectively raised the bar for everyone. The directive created a powerful incentive for firms to apply best execution principles more broadly, even in situations where the legitimate reliance test might have previously offered an exemption.

The introduction of [RTS 28](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rts-28/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), which requires firms to publish an annual report on their top five execution venues for each class of financial instrument, was a particularly potent catalyst for change. This public disclosure requirement brought an unprecedented level of transparency to execution practices. A firm’s choice of counterparties was no longer a private, internal matter. It was now subject to scrutiny by clients, competitors, and regulators.

This created a strong reputational incentive to develop a robust and defensible counterparty selection process. Firms could no longer rely on informal justifications for their choices; they needed a systematic methodology, backed by quantitative analysis, to demonstrate that their selection of counterparties was designed to consistently deliver the best results for their clients. The burden of proof had shifted decisively, from assuming compliance to demonstrating it with hard data.

![A dark central hub with three reflective, translucent blades extending. This represents a Principal's operational framework for digital asset derivatives, processing aggregated liquidity and multi-leg spread inquiries](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-rfq-protocol-engine-for-high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

![A precise central mechanism, representing an institutional RFQ engine, is bisected by a luminous teal liquidity pipeline. This visualizes high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives, enabling precise price discovery and atomic settlement within an optimized market microstructure for multi-leg spreads](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-core-execution-system-1.jpg)

## Strategy

In response to the systemic pressures introduced by MiFID II, investment firms were compelled to abandon ad-hoc, relationship-driven counterparty selection strategies and develop new, data-centric frameworks. The strategic imperative shifted from maintaining a comfortable network of liquidity providers to engineering a dynamic, competitive, and fully auditable counterparty ecosystem. This required a fundamental rethinking of how counterparties were evaluated, onboarded, and monitored. The new strategic goal was to build a process that not only complied with the letter of the regulation but also leveraged its requirements to generate a tangible competitive advantage through superior [execution quality](https://prime.greeks.live/area/execution-quality/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite).

The first step in this strategic evolution was the formalization of the counterparty evaluation process. Firms moved away from informal mental models and began to develop quantitative “liquidity provider scorecards.” These scorecards represent a structured approach to assessing counterparties against the full spectrum of MiFID II best execution factors. Instead of relying on a trader’s gut feeling about a counterparty’s reliability, firms began to systematically track and measure performance across multiple dimensions.

This allowed for a more objective and holistic assessment of a counterparty’s value, moving the conversation beyond just the price quoted on a single trade. The development of these scorecards became a core component of a firm’s order [execution policy](https://prime.greeks.live/area/execution-policy/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), providing a clear and defensible methodology for counterparty selection.

![A transparent glass bar, representing high-fidelity execution and precise RFQ protocols, extends over a white sphere symbolizing a deep liquidity pool for institutional digital asset derivatives. A small glass bead signifies atomic settlement within the granular market microstructure, supported by robust Prime RFQ infrastructure ensuring optimal price discovery and minimal slippage](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-prime-os-intelligence-layer-facilitating-optimal-price-discovery-and-best-execution.jpg)

## Designing the Counterparty Scorecard

The effectiveness of a [liquidity provider scorecard](https://prime.greeks.live/area/liquidity-provider-scorecard/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is determined by the quality and relevance of the metrics it employs. A well-designed scorecard provides a multi-faceted view of a counterparty’s performance, enabling a firm to make informed decisions about who to include in its RFQ auctions. The goal is to create a composite score that reflects a counterparty’s overall execution quality, while also allowing for deeper analysis of its strengths and weaknesses across specific factors.

Key components of a comprehensive [counterparty scorecard](https://prime.greeks.live/area/counterparty-scorecard/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) typically include:

- **Pricing Competitiveness** ▴ This goes beyond simply tracking the win rate on RFQs. It involves measuring the average spread of a counterparty’s quotes against a relevant benchmark, the frequency and magnitude of price improvement offered, and the consistency of pricing across different market conditions and trade sizes.

- **Response Quality and Speed** ▴ A critical factor in fast-moving markets. This metric tracks the average time it takes for a counterparty to respond to an RFQ, the percentage of RFQs that receive a response (the “hit rate”), and the frequency of “no-quotes” or rejected requests. A provider who is consistently fast and reliable, even if not always the top price, adds significant value.

- **Execution Likelihood and Reliability** ▴ This measures the probability that a quote, once accepted, will result in a successful trade. It involves tracking the “[fill rate](https://prime.greeks.live/area/fill-rate/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)” or “quote-to-trade ratio,” which is the percentage of accepted quotes that are successfully executed. A high fill rate indicates a reliable counterparty who honors their quotes.

- **Post-Trade Performance** ▴ Best execution does not end at the point of trade. This category includes metrics related to settlement efficiency, such as the rate of settlement fails or delays. A counterparty that consistently causes settlement issues can introduce significant operational risk and cost, detracting from an otherwise [competitive price](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-do-multi-dealer-platforms-aggregate-mid-price-data-to-ensure-a-fair-and-competitive-rfq-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite).

- **Qualitative Factors** ▴ While the focus of MiFID II is on quantitative data, qualitative assessments remain important. This can include factors like the counterparty’s creditworthiness, their operational responsiveness during market stress, and their willingness to provide liquidity in difficult-to-trade instruments or larger sizes. These factors are often harder to quantify but are a crucial part of a holistic risk assessment.

![Abstract geometric planes, translucent teal representing dynamic liquidity pools and implied volatility surfaces, intersect a dark bar. This signifies FIX protocol driven algorithmic trading and smart order routing](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/optimized-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## From Static Lists to Dynamic Rosters

The implementation of these data-driven scorecards enabled a strategic shift from maintaining a static list of approved counterparties to managing a dynamic roster. In the pre-MiFID II era, the group of dealers a trader would send an RFQ to was often small and changed infrequently. The new paradigm required a more fluid and competitive approach.

Counterparties could now be added or removed from the active roster based on their ongoing performance as measured by the scorecard. This created a virtuous cycle of competition, incentivizing liquidity providers to consistently offer better pricing and service to maintain their position.

> The strategic response to MiFID II involved transforming counterparty selection from a static, relationship-based practice into a dynamic, data-driven competition for execution quality.

This dynamic management of the counterparty roster also allowed firms to tailor their RFQ auctions more effectively. For example, for a large, illiquid trade, a firm might prioritize counterparties with a proven track record of providing liquidity in size, even if their response times are slightly slower. For a small, liquid trade in a fast-moving market, the firm might prioritize counterparties with the fastest response times and highest hit rates.

This ability to segment and select counterparties based on the specific characteristics of the order is a core tenet of MiFID II’s best execution obligation. The table below illustrates the strategic shift in the counterparty selection process.

### Table 1 ▴ Evolution of Counterparty Selection Strategy

| Factor | Pre-MiFID II Approach (Relationship-Based) | Post-MiFID II Approach (Data-Driven) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Selection Basis | Primarily based on historical relationships, voice-based trust, and perceived market share. | Based on quantitative performance scorecards, incorporating price, cost, speed, and likelihood of execution. |
| Counterparty Pool | Small, static group of “go-to” dealers. Changes to the list were infrequent. | Larger, dynamic roster of approved counterparties. Performance is continuously monitored, and the roster is adjusted accordingly. |
| Decision Driver | Trader’s discretion and qualitative judgment. | Systematic process guided by the firm’s formal Order Execution Policy. |
| Evidence | Anecdotal evidence and trade blotters. Difficult to systematically prove best execution. | Comprehensive audit trail of all RFQs, quotes, and execution data. Demonstrable proof of a sufficient process. |
| Technology | Primarily phone, chat, and basic electronic messaging. Limited data capture. | Advanced Execution Management Systems (EMS) with integrated Transaction Cost Analysis (TCA) and counterparty monitoring tools. |

![A symmetrical, star-shaped Prime RFQ engine with four translucent blades symbolizes multi-leg spread execution and diverse liquidity pools. Its central core represents price discovery for aggregated inquiry, ensuring high-fidelity execution within a secure market microstructure via smart order routing for block trades](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-prime-os-1.jpg)

![Abstract bisected spheres, reflective grey and textured teal, forming an infinity, symbolize institutional digital asset derivatives. Grey represents high-fidelity execution and market microstructure teal, deep liquidity pools and volatility surface data](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocols-for-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

## Execution

The successful execution of a MiFID II-compliant counterparty selection strategy hinges on the seamless integration of technology, data, and operational workflows. It requires building a robust, automated system capable of capturing the necessary data, performing sophisticated analysis, and providing traders with the tools to make informed, defensible decisions. This is where the strategic vision is translated into a tangible, operational reality. The execution framework must be designed not only to meet the reporting requirements of RTS 27 and 28 but also to embed the principles of best execution into the very fabric of the firm’s trading process.

At the heart of this framework is the firm’s [Execution Management System](https://prime.greeks.live/area/execution-management-system/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (EMS) or Order Management System (OMS). These platforms evolved from simple order routing systems into sophisticated data capture and analysis engines. To comply with MiFID II, these systems needed to be enhanced to provide a complete, time-stamped audit trail of every RFQ.

This includes the time the RFQ was sent, the list of counterparties it was sent to, the time each quote was received, the content of each quote, the time of the execution request, and the final execution time and price. This granular level of data capture is the bedrock upon which the entire best execution monitoring and reporting process is built.

![A sleek, precision-engineered device with a split-screen interface displaying implied volatility and price discovery data for digital asset derivatives. This institutional grade module optimizes RFQ protocols, ensuring high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency within market microstructure for multi-leg spreads](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-module.jpg)

## The Operational Playbook for Compliant RFQ Workflows

Implementing a compliant RFQ process requires a clear, step-by-step operational playbook. This playbook ensures that the principles of the firm’s [order execution](https://prime.greeks.live/area/order-execution/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) policy are applied consistently across all trades and all traders. It provides a standardized process that is both efficient for the trading desk and robust from a compliance perspective.

- **Order Characterization** ▴ Before an RFQ is initiated, the system or trader must classify the order based on its characteristics (e.g. asset class, liquidity profile, size, urgency). This initial classification helps determine the appropriate execution strategy and the relevant factors to prioritize when selecting counterparties.

- **Dynamic Counterparty Filtering** ▴ Based on the order characteristics, the EMS should automatically filter and suggest a list of suitable counterparties from the approved roster. This selection is driven by the counterparty scorecard data. For instance, a large, illiquid bond RFQ might automatically prioritize dealers with high scores for providing size and consistent pricing in that specific asset class.

- **Competitive Auction** ▴ The RFQ is sent electronically to the selected group of counterparties. The system should be configured to ensure a sufficient number of counterparties are included in the auction to ensure competitive tension, in line with the firm’s execution policy. The optimal number may vary by asset class and trade size.

- **Systematic Quote Evaluation** ▴ As quotes are received, the EMS should display them in a clear, normalized format, allowing the trader to compare them on a like-for-like basis. The system should also enrich this view with additional data from the counterparty scorecard, such as the provider’s average response time and fill rate, giving the trader a more complete picture of the execution quality being offered.

- **Evidence-Based Decision and Execution** ▴ The trader selects the best quote, taking into account all the relevant execution factors. The system must record the justification for the decision, especially in cases where the best-priced quote is not selected. For example, a trader might choose a slightly worse price from a counterparty with a significantly higher fill rate and better settlement record, judging that the increased certainty of execution outweighs the marginal price difference. This justification is a critical piece of the audit trail.

- **Post-Trade Data Loop** ▴ Following execution, the trade data, including the final execution price and settlement status, is fed back into the counterparty scorecard system. This creates a continuous feedback loop, ensuring that the performance data used for future counterparty selection is always up-to-date.

![A precision mechanism with a central circular core and a linear element extending to a sharp tip, encased in translucent material. This symbolizes an institutional RFQ protocol's market microstructure, enabling high-fidelity execution and price discovery for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-microstructure-facilitating-optimal-price-discovery-and-best-execution.jpg)

## Quantitative Modeling and Data Analysis

The engine driving this entire process is the quantitative analysis of counterparty performance. This analysis goes far beyond simple rankings and requires a sophisticated approach to data modeling. Firms must be able to normalize and compare performance across different asset classes, market conditions, and trade types. The goal is to build a predictive model that can help traders select the counterparties most likely to provide the best possible outcome for a given order.

The table below provides a simplified example of the type of data that would be captured and analyzed in a counterparty scorecard system for corporate bond RFQs. This data would be used to calculate the composite scores that drive the dynamic counterparty filtering process.

> The operational execution of MiFID II’s requirements depends on a tightly integrated system of technology and data analytics that creates a continuous, evidence-based feedback loop.

### Table 2 ▴ Sample Counterparty Performance Data (Corporate Bonds – Q3 2025)

| Counterparty | Avg. Response Time (sec) | Hit Rate (%) | Win Rate (%) | Avg. Spread vs. Benchmark (bps) | Fill Rate (%) | Settlement Fail Rate (%) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Dealer A | 4.2 | 95 | 25 | +1.5 | 99.8 | 0.1 |
| Dealer B | 6.8 | 88 | 15 | +2.0 | 99.9 | 0.05 |
| Dealer C | 3.5 | 98 | 30 | +1.2 | 98.5 | 0.5 |
| Dealer D | 8.1 | 75 | 10 | +2.5 | 99.5 | 0.2 |

From this data, a firm can draw several conclusions. Dealer C is the most competitive on price (highest win rate, tightest spread) and the fastest to respond, but has a slightly higher [settlement fail rate](https://prime.greeks.live/area/settlement-fail-rate/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) and a lower fill rate than Dealer A. Dealer A, while slightly less competitive on price, is extremely reliable, with a high fill rate and a very low settlement fail rate. Dealer B is slower and less competitive on price but is exceptionally reliable post-trade. Dealer D is clearly underperforming across most metrics.

A sophisticated execution system would weigh these factors based on the specific needs of the order. For a standard, liquid trade, Dealer C might be the preferred choice. For a complex, large-sized trade where certainty of execution and settlement is paramount, Dealer A or B might be a more prudent choice, even at a slightly wider spread. This ability to make and document such nuanced decisions is the essence of executing a MiFID II-compliant strategy.

![The abstract image features angular, parallel metallic and colored planes, suggesting structured market microstructure for digital asset derivatives. A spherical element represents a block trade or RFQ protocol inquiry, reflecting dynamic implied volatility and price discovery within a dark pool](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/optimized-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-framework-ensuring-principal-best-execution-and-latent-liquidity-capture.jpg)

## References

- European Securities and Markets Authority. “Guidelines on the application of the definitions of commodity derivatives under C6 and C7 of Annex I of MiFID.” ESMA/2015/624, 2015.

- Financial Conduct Authority. “Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II Implementation ▴ Policy Statement II.” PS17/14, July 2017.

- European Commission. “Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/565 of 25 April 2016 supplementing Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards organisational requirements and operating conditions for investment firms and defined terms for the purposes of that Directive.” Official Journal of the European Union, L 87/1, 31.3.2017.

- BofA Securities. “Order Execution Policy.” 2020.

- International Capital Market Association. “MiFID II Best Execution requirements for repo and SFTs ▴ The challenges and (im)practicalities.” January 2017.

- Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority. “Guide for drafting/review of Execution Policy under MiFID II.” 2018.

- “Best Execution Under MiFID II.” TP ICAP, 2017.

- European Securities and Markets Authority. “Questions and Answers on MiFID II and MiFIR investor protection and intermediaries topics.” ESMA35-43-349, continuously updated.

![A modular, institutional-grade device with a central data aggregation interface and metallic spigot. This Prime RFQ represents a robust RFQ protocol engine, enabling high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives, optimizing capital efficiency and best execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/principals-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-for-optimized-rfq-protocol-best-execution-system.jpg)

## Reflection

![Abstract system interface on a global data sphere, illustrating a sophisticated RFQ protocol for institutional digital asset derivatives. The glowing circuits represent market microstructure and high-fidelity execution within a Prime RFQ intelligence layer, facilitating price discovery and capital efficiency across liquidity pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-prime-os.jpg)

## Calibrating the Execution System

The transition mandated by MiFID II was far more than a compliance exercise. It was an enforced evolution, compelling the market to re-evaluate the very nature of execution quality. Viewing the regulation through a systems lens reveals its true impact ▴ it installed a mandatory, high-frequency feedback loop into the operational architecture of every investment firm.

The data generated by this loop ▴ the response times, the fill rates, the price deviations ▴ became the calibration signal for the entire trading process. The strategic challenge for institutions is not merely to collect this data, but to build an intelligent system that can interpret its signals and dynamically adjust its parameters to optimize for the best possible outcome.

This raises a critical question for any institutional trading desk ▴ is your operational framework a passive data recorder, or is it an active learning system? A framework that simply logs RFQ data for annual reporting fulfills the letter of the law. A superior framework, however, uses that data in real-time to refine its models, challenge its assumptions, and continuously improve its predictive capabilities.

It understands that the definition of the “best” counterparty is not static; it is a fluid concept that changes with market conditions, order characteristics, and the evolving capabilities of the liquidity providers themselves. The ultimate advantage is found in building a system that not only proves what it did, but also learns how to do it better tomorrow.

![Modular institutional-grade execution system components reveal luminous green data pathways, symbolizing high-fidelity cross-asset connectivity. This depicts intricate market microstructure facilitating RFQ protocol integration for atomic settlement of digital asset derivatives within a Principal's operational framework, underpinned by a Prime RFQ intelligence layer](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/modular-high-fidelity-execution-architecture-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-integration-and-principals-operational-framework-optimization.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/request-for-quote/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Sleek, intersecting planes, one teal, converge at a reflective central module. This visualizes an institutional digital asset derivatives Prime RFQ, enabling RFQ price discovery across liquidity pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimizing-institutional-liquidity-aggregation-and-best-execution.jpg)

## Request for Quote

Meaning ▴ A Request for Quote, or RFQ, constitutes a formal communication initiated by a potential buyer or seller to solicit price quotations for a specified financial instrument or block of instruments from one or more liquidity providers. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/investment-firms/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract intersecting beams with glowing channels precisely balance dark spheres. This symbolizes institutional RFQ protocols for digital asset derivatives, enabling high-fidelity execution, optimal price discovery, and capital efficiency within complex market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-best-execution-prime-os-infrastructure.jpg)

## Investment Firms

Meaning ▴ Investment Firms are institutional entities primarily engaged in the management, deployment, and intermediation of capital within financial markets, operating as critical nodes in the global capital allocation network. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/counterparty-selection/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, institutional-grade system processes a dynamic stream of market microstructure data, projecting a high-fidelity execution pathway for digital asset derivatives. This represents a private quotation RFQ protocol, optimizing price discovery and capital efficiency through an intelligence layer](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-rfq-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-microstructure-prime-os.jpg)

## Counterparty Selection

Meaning ▴ Counterparty selection refers to the systematic process of identifying, evaluating, and engaging specific entities for trade execution, risk transfer, or service provision, based on predefined criteria such as creditworthiness, liquidity provision, operational reliability, and pricing competitiveness within a digital asset derivatives ecosystem. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/liquidity-providers/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A transparent, multi-faceted component, indicative of an RFQ engine's intricate market microstructure logic, emerges from complex FIX Protocol connectivity. Its sharp edges signify high-fidelity execution and price discovery precision for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimized-for-best-execution.jpg)

## Liquidity Providers

Meaning ▴ Liquidity Providers are market participants, typically institutional entities or sophisticated trading firms, that facilitate efficient market operations by continuously quoting bid and offer prices for financial instruments. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/execution-factors/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sophisticated digital asset derivatives RFQ engine's core components are depicted, showcasing precise market microstructure for optimal price discovery. Its central hub facilitates algorithmic trading, ensuring high-fidelity execution across multi-leg spreads](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimizing-multi-leg-spreads-for-optimal-capital-efficiency.jpg)

## Execution Factors

Meaning ▴ Execution Factors are the quantifiable, dynamic variables that directly influence the outcome and quality of a trade execution within institutional digital asset markets. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/mifid-ii/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sophisticated mechanism features a segmented disc, indicating dynamic market microstructure and liquidity pool partitioning. This system visually represents an RFQ protocol's price discovery process, crucial for high-fidelity execution of institutional digital asset derivatives and managing counterparty risk within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/advanced-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-liquidity-aggregation-system.jpg)

## Mifid Ii

Meaning ▴ MiFID II, the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II, constitutes a comprehensive regulatory framework enacted by the European Union to govern financial markets, investment firms, and trading venues. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/data-capture/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A translucent sphere with intricate metallic rings, an 'intelligence layer' core, is bisected by a sleek, reflective blade. This visual embodies an 'institutional grade' 'Prime RFQ' enabling 'high-fidelity execution' of 'digital asset derivatives' via 'private quotation' and 'RFQ protocols', optimizing 'capital efficiency' and 'market microstructure' for 'block trade' operations](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-rfq-engine-for-digital-asset-derivatives-best-execution.jpg)

## Data Capture

Meaning ▴ Data Capture refers to the precise, systematic acquisition and ingestion of raw, real-time information streams from various market sources into a structured data repository. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/order-execution-policy/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Intricate metallic mechanisms portray a proprietary matching engine or execution management system. Its robust structure enables algorithmic trading and high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-market-microstructure.jpg)

## Order Execution Policy

Meaning ▴ An Order Execution Policy defines the systematic procedures and criteria governing how an institutional trading desk processes and routes client or proprietary orders across various liquidity venues. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/regulatory-technical-standards/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A polished glass sphere reflecting diagonal beige, black, and cyan bands, rests on a metallic base against a dark background. This embodies RFQ-driven Price Discovery and High-Fidelity Execution for Digital Asset Derivatives, optimizing Market Microstructure and mitigating Counterparty Risk via Prime RFQ Private Quotation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-best-execution-protocol.jpg)

## Regulatory Technical Standards

Meaning ▴ Regulatory Technical Standards, or RTS, are legally binding technical specifications developed by European Supervisory Authorities to elaborate on the details of legislative acts within the European Union's financial services framework. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/best-execution/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek green probe, symbolizing a precise RFQ protocol, engages a dark, textured execution venue, representing a digital asset derivatives liquidity pool. This signifies institutional-grade price discovery and high-fidelity execution through an advanced Prime RFQ, minimizing slippage and optimizing capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-integration-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-institutional-liquidity-aggregation-on-prime-os.jpg)

## Best Execution

Meaning ▴ Best Execution is the obligation to obtain the most favorable terms reasonably available for a client's order. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rts-28/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![An abstract metallic circular interface with intricate patterns visualizes an institutional grade RFQ protocol for block trade execution. A central pivot holds a golden pointer with a transparent liquidity pool sphere and a blue pointer, depicting market microstructure optimization and high-fidelity execution for multi-leg spread price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-market-microstructure-optimization.jpg)

## Rts 28

Meaning ▴ RTS 28 refers to Regulatory Technical Standard 28 under MiFID II, which mandates investment firms and market operators to publish annual reports on the quality of execution of transactions on trading venues and for financial instruments. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/execution-quality/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precision metallic instrument with a black sphere rests on a multi-layered platform. This symbolizes institutional digital asset derivatives market microstructure, enabling high-fidelity execution and optimal price discovery across diverse liquidity pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocol-engine-component-digital-asset-derivatives-market-microstructure.jpg)

## Execution Quality

Meaning ▴ Execution Quality quantifies the efficacy of an order's fill, assessing how closely the achieved trade price aligns with the prevailing market price at submission, alongside consideration for speed, cost, and market impact. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/execution-policy/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Intersecting transparent and opaque geometric planes, symbolizing the intricate market microstructure of institutional digital asset derivatives. Visualizes high-fidelity execution and price discovery via RFQ protocols, demonstrating multi-leg spread strategies and dark liquidity for capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-market-microstructure-architecture.jpg)

## Execution Policy

Meaning ▴ An Execution Policy defines a structured set of rules and computational logic governing the handling and execution of financial orders within a trading system. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/liquidity-provider-scorecard/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A chrome cross-shaped central processing unit rests on a textured surface, symbolizing a Principal's institutional grade execution engine. It integrates multi-leg options strategies and RFQ protocols, leveraging real-time order book dynamics for optimal price discovery in digital asset derivatives, minimizing slippage and maximizing capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principals-high-fidelity-rfq-execution-digital-asset-derivatives-hub.jpg)

## Liquidity Provider Scorecard

Meaning ▴ The Liquidity Provider Scorecard is a quantitative assessment framework designed to evaluate the performance and quality of liquidity provision across various market participants. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/counterparty-scorecard/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A complex, multi-layered electronic component with a central connector and fine metallic probes. This represents a critical Prime RFQ module for institutional digital asset derivatives trading, enabling high-fidelity execution of RFQ protocols, price discovery, and atomic settlement for multi-leg spreads with minimal latency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-engine-driving-best-execution-and-liquidity.jpg)

## Counterparty Scorecard

Meaning ▴ A Counterparty Scorecard is a quantitative framework designed to assess and rank the creditworthiness, operational stability, and performance reliability of trading counterparties within an institutional context. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/fill-rate/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precise metallic instrument, resembling an algorithmic trading probe or a multi-leg spread representation, passes through a transparent RFQ protocol gateway. This illustrates high-fidelity execution within market microstructure, facilitating price discovery for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-orchestration-of-institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution.jpg)

## Fill Rate

Meaning ▴ Fill Rate represents the ratio of the executed quantity of a trading order to its initial submitted quantity, expressed as a percentage. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-do-multi-dealer-platforms-aggregate-mid-price-data-to-ensure-a-fair-and-competitive-rfq-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, high-fidelity beige device with reflective black elements and a control point, set against a dynamic green-to-blue gradient sphere. This abstract representation symbolizes institutional-grade RFQ protocols for digital asset derivatives, ensuring high-fidelity execution and price discovery within market microstructure, powered by an intelligence layer for alpha generation and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-terminal-system.jpg)

## Competitive Price

Multi-dealer platforms synthesize a defensible mid-price from diverse data to anchor a competitive, private auction for institutional trades. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/execution-management-system/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Parallel execution layers, light green, interface with a dark teal curved component. This depicts a secure RFQ protocol interface for institutional digital asset derivatives, enabling price discovery and block trade execution within a Prime RFQ framework, reflecting dynamic market microstructure for high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-driven-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-framework.jpg)

## Execution Management System

Meaning ▴ An Execution Management System (EMS) is a specialized software application engineered to facilitate and optimize the electronic execution of financial trades across diverse venues and asset classes. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/order-execution/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A central translucent disk, representing a Liquidity Pool or RFQ Hub, is intersected by a precision Execution Engine bar. Its core, an Intelligence Layer, signifies dynamic Price Discovery and Algorithmic Trading logic for Digital Asset Derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-visualizing-microstructure.jpg)

## Order Execution

Meaning ▴ Order Execution defines the precise operational sequence that transforms a Principal's trading intent into a definitive, completed transaction within a digital asset market. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/settlement-fail-rate/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A central core represents a Prime RFQ engine, facilitating high-fidelity execution. Transparent, layered structures denote aggregated liquidity pools and multi-leg spread strategies](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-engine-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

## Settlement Fail Rate

Meaning ▴ The Settlement Fail Rate quantifies the proportion of executed trades that do not successfully complete the transfer of assets and corresponding cash on their stipulated settlement date. </a>

**Tags:** [Order Execution](https://options.greeks.live/area/order-execution/), [Request for Quote](https://options.greeks.live/area/request-for-quote/), [Execution Factors](https://options.greeks.live/area/execution-factors/), [Fill Rate](https://options.greeks.live/area/fill-rate/), [Counterparty Selection](https://options.greeks.live/area/counterparty-selection/), [Liquidity Providers](https://options.greeks.live/area/liquidity-providers/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [How Do Regulatory Frameworks like MiFID II Influence RFQ Trading and Best Execution?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-regulatory-frameworks-like-mifid-ii-influence-rfq-trading-and-best-execution/)
![A precision-engineered institutional digital asset derivatives execution system cutaway. The teal Prime RFQ casing reveals intricate market microstructure. Bright blue internal elements represent dynamic liquidity pools, enabling high-fidelity execution and efficient RFQ protocols for multi-leg spread strategies.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-rfq-protocol-core-engine.jpg)

MiFID II mandates a systematic, evidence-based architecture for RFQ trading to ensure demonstrable best execution.

- 
### [What Are the Core Data Requirements for Proving Best Execution under MiFID II?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-core-data-requirements-for-proving-best-execution-under-mifid-ii/)
![A central glowing blue mechanism with a precision reticle is encased by dark metallic panels. This symbolizes an institutional-grade Principal's operational framework for high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives. It embodies RFQ processing, enabling price discovery within a deep liquidity pool, optimizing market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-core-enabling-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution.jpg)

Proving MiFID II best execution requires a systemic data architecture to empirically validate execution quality against all relevant factors.

- 
### [How Does MiFID II’s Best Execution Policy Alter RFQ Counterparty Selection?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-mifid-iis-best-execution-policy-alter-rfq-counterparty-selection/)
![Highly polished metallic components signify an institutional-grade RFQ engine, the heart of a Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives. Its precise engineering enables high-fidelity execution, supporting multi-leg spreads, optimizing liquidity aggregation, and minimizing slippage within complex market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineering-underpinning-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq.jpg)

MiFID II transforms RFQ counterparty selection from a relational art into a systematic, data-driven engineering discipline.

- 
### [What Are the Practical Steps to Implement a Compliant Options Best Execution Policy?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-practical-steps-to-implement-a-compliant-options-best-execution-policy/)
![Interconnected translucent rings with glowing internal mechanisms symbolize an RFQ protocol engine. This Principal's Operational Framework ensures High-Fidelity Execution and precise Price Discovery for Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives, optimizing Market Microstructure and Capital Efficiency via Atomic Settlement.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

A compliant options best execution policy is a dynamic, data-driven system designed to continuously optimize execution outcomes.

- 
### [How Does MiFID II Change the Evidentiary Burden for Asset Managers?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-mifid-ii-change-the-evidentiary-burden-for-asset-managers/)
![A transparent, multi-faceted component, indicative of an RFQ engine's intricate market microstructure logic, emerges from complex FIX Protocol connectivity. Its sharp edges signify high-fidelity execution and price discovery precision for institutional digital asset derivatives. This Prime RFQ module optimizes algorithmic trading and capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimized-for-best-execution.jpg)

MiFID II transforms the evidentiary burden into a systemic requirement to prove optimal execution outcomes through continuous data analysis.

- 
### [What Are the Core Differences between MiFID II and FINRA Best Execution Rules?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-core-differences-between-mifid-ii-and-finra-best-execution-rules/)
![A polished, dark spherical component anchors a sophisticated system architecture, flanked by a precise green data bus. This represents a high-fidelity execution engine, enabling institutional-grade RFQ protocols for digital asset derivatives. It embodies the precision of private quotation and efficient latent liquidity aggregation within market microstructure, crucial for optimal capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-core.jpg)

MiFID II demands continuous, data-driven proof of optimal outcomes; FINRA requires a defensible process of reasonable diligence.

- 
### [How Does the Best Execution Obligation Change When Dealing with Different Client Categories under Mifid Ii?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-best-execution-obligation-change-when-dealing-with-different-client-categories-under-mifid-ii/)
![A precision-engineered, multi-layered system component, symbolizing the intricate market microstructure of institutional digital asset derivatives. Two distinct probes represent RFQ protocols for price discovery and high-fidelity execution, integrating latent liquidity and pre-trade analytics within a robust Prime RFQ framework, ensuring best execution.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

MiFID II calibrates best execution obligations to client sophistication, demanding a tiered operational system.

- 
### [How Did MiFID II’S”Sufficient Steps” Requirement Alter Best Execution Policies?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-did-mifid-iis-sufficient-steps-requirement-alter-best-execution-policies/)
![Three sensor-like components flank a central, illuminated teal lens, reflecting an advanced RFQ protocol system. This represents an institutional digital asset derivatives platform's intelligence layer for precise price discovery, high-fidelity execution, and managing multi-leg spread strategies, optimizing market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-for-optimal-execution.jpg)

MiFID II's "sufficient steps" mandate re-architected best execution from a procedural obligation into a data-driven system requiring quantifiable proof of optimal outcomes.

- 
### [What Are the Primary Differences between MiFID I and MiFID II Best Execution Standards?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-differences-between-mifid-i-and-mifid-ii-best-execution-standards/)
![Visualizing institutional digital asset derivatives market microstructure. A central RFQ protocol engine facilitates high-fidelity execution across diverse liquidity pools, enabling precise price discovery for multi-leg spreads. The connecting element signifies smart order routing for atomic settlement.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-across-multi-asset-liquidity.jpg)

MiFID II elevated best execution from a procedural principle to a data-driven discipline requiring proof of sufficient steps across all asset classes.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "How Did MiFID II&#8217;s Best Execution Requirements Change Counterparty Selection for RFQs?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-did-mifid-iis-best-execution-requirements-change-counterparty-selection-for-rfqs/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-did-mifid-iis-best-execution-requirements-change-counterparty-selection-for-rfqs/"
    },
    "headline": "How Did MiFID II's Best Execution Requirements Change Counterparty Selection for RFQs? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "MiFID II mandated a shift from relationship-based to evidence-based RFQ counterparty selection, requiring a data-driven, systematic process. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-did-mifid-iis-best-execution-requirements-change-counterparty-selection-for-rfqs/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-07T14:15:54+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-08-07T14:16:12+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-liquidity-orchestration.jpg",
        "caption": "The image depicts a sophisticated central hub with four dynamically positioned, multi-colored blades, interconnected by slender metallic rods. This visual metaphor illustrates a Prime RFQ engine, orchestrating diverse institutional liquidity pools and dark pools for optimal price discovery in digital asset derivatives. It represents high-fidelity execution, managing complex multi-leg spreads and portfolio margin requirements. Robust FIX protocol integration ensures low-latency atomic settlement, mitigating counterparty risk for best execution and alpha generation."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Best Execution",
        "Counterparty Scorecard",
        "Counterparty Selection",
        "Data Capture",
        "Execution Factors",
        "Execution Management System",
        "Execution Policy",
        "Execution Quality",
        "Fill Rate",
        "Financial Regulation",
        "Investment Firms",
        "Liquidity Provider Scorecard",
        "Liquidity Providers",
        "Market Microstructure",
        "MiFID II",
        "Order Execution",
        "Order Execution Policy",
        "Regulatory Technical Standards",
        "Request for Quote",
        "RTS 28",
        "Settlement Fail Rate",
        "Transaction Cost Analysis"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/how-did-mifid-iis-best-execution-requirements-change-counterparty-selection-for-rfqs/
