# How Do Courts Define Commercial Reasonableness in ISDA Loss Calculations? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-02
**Categories:** Question

---

![A cutaway view reveals the intricate core of an institutional-grade digital asset derivatives execution engine. The central price discovery aperture, flanked by pre-trade analytics layers, represents high-fidelity execution capabilities for multi-leg spread and private quotation via RFQ protocols for Bitcoin options](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-rfq-protocol-engine-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-price-discovery-on-volatility-surface.jpg)

![An exposed institutional digital asset derivatives engine reveals its market microstructure. The polished disc represents a liquidity pool for price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system.jpg)

## Concept

In the architecture of financial markets, precision in contractual language is the primary defense against catastrophic ambiguity. When a derivative contract is terminated, the calculation of net loss is not a theoretical exercise; it is a critical procedure where the definition of “reasonableness” dictates the flow of capital. Courts have moved decisively to define [commercial reasonableness](https://prime.greeks.live/area/commercial-reasonableness/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) within International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) agreements as a standard of objective, demonstrable conduct, rather than a test of subjective belief or mere rationality. This interpretation hinges on a pivotal evolution in the [ISDA Master Agreement](https://prime.greeks.live/area/isda-master-agreement/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) itself, specifically the transition from the 1992 version to the 2002 version.

The core of the judicial interpretation rests on the distinction between two standards of conduct. The [1992 ISDA Master Agreement](https://prime.greeks.live/area/1992-isda-master-agreement/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), when “Loss” is the selected payment measure, requires the non-defaulting party to determine an amount it “reasonably determines in good faith to be its total losses and costs”. Courts, particularly in cases following the 2008 financial crisis, interpreted this as a test of rationality. This standard, often associated with the [Wednesbury unreasonableness](https://prime.greeks.live/area/wednesbury-unreasonableness/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) principle in UK public law, is a relatively low bar to clear.

It essentially requires the [calculating party](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-constitutes-a-commercially-reasonable-procedure-for-calculating-a-derivatives-close-out-amount/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) to avoid a determination that is arbitrary, capricious, or one that no reasonable party in its position could possibly have reached. It grants significant discretion to the calculating party, so long as its actions are not completely irrational.

> The shift from the 1992 to the 2002 ISDA Master Agreement marks a fundamental change from a subjective rationality test to a stringent, objective standard of commercial reasonableness.

Conversely, the 2002 ISDA Master Agreement introduced a more demanding framework for its “Close-out Amount” calculation. It mandates that the determining party must act “in good faith and use [commercially reasonable procedures](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-do-courts-interpret-commercially-reasonable-procedures-in-close-out-amount-calculations/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) in order to produce a commercially reasonable result”. English courts, in landmark rulings such as [Lehman Brothers Special Financing](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-did-the-lehman-brothers-bankruptcy-influence-the-adoption-of-the-2002-isda-close-out-amount-protocol/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) Inc. v National Power Corporation, have dissected this phrase to establish a two-fold objective test. This means that both the process of the calculation (the “procedures”) and the final figure (the “result”) are subject to scrutiny against an objective benchmark of what would be considered commercially reasonable in the prevailing market conditions.

The [determining party](https://prime.greeks.live/area/determining-party/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)’s subjective belief that it acted reasonably is insufficient. It must be able to provide evidence that its methodology and outcome align with accepted market practices.

This judicial clarification elevates the standard significantly. It transforms the [close-out calculation](https://prime.greeks.live/area/close-out-calculation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) from a discretionary act protected by a wide margin of error into a fiduciary-like responsibility that demands transparency, diligence, and justification based on observable market data and practices. The court’s stance is that the specific change in wording between the two agreements was a deliberate act by ISDA to introduce greater objectivity and fairness, removing the potential for a [non-defaulting party](https://prime.greeks.live/area/non-defaulting-party/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) to exploit its position, even if it does so in good faith.

![A sleek metallic device with a central translucent sphere and dual sharp probes. This symbolizes an institutional-grade intelligence layer, driving high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-platform-precision.jpg)

![A stylized depiction of institutional-grade digital asset derivatives RFQ execution. A central glowing liquidity pool for price discovery is precisely pierced by an algorithmic trading path, symbolizing high-fidelity execution and slippage minimization within market microstructure via a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-high-fidelity-execution-1.jpg)

## Strategy

The strategic implications of the judicial definition of “commercial reasonableness” are profound for any institution engaged in derivatives trading. The shift from a rationality test to an [objective standard](https://prime.greeks.live/area/objective-standard/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) fundamentally alters risk management protocols, documentation requirements, and potential litigation exposure during the close-out process. A failure to internalize this distinction within an institution’s operational framework is a failure of risk architecture.

![A central dark nexus with intersecting data conduits and swirling translucent elements depicts a sophisticated RFQ protocol's intelligence layer. This visualizes dynamic market microstructure, precise price discovery, and high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives, optimizing capital efficiency and mitigating counterparty risk](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-visualizing-high-fidelity-execution-and-market-microstructure-dynamics.jpg)

## The Evolution of Contractual Standards

The strategic decision by ISDA to modify the close-out language between the 1992 and 2002 Master Agreements was a direct response to the market’s need for greater certainty and less discretion in times of stress. The 1992 “Loss” calculation method was perceived as granting too much latitude to the non-defaulting party. The strategy behind the 2002 “[Close-out Amount](https://prime.greeks.live/area/close-out-amount/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)” was to create a more balanced and transparent mechanism, thereby reducing disputes and promoting market stability. For market participants, the strategy must be to align their internal procedures with this stricter, objective standard, treating every close-out calculation as a potentially defensible event.

This requires a proactive, evidence-based approach. The non-defaulting party must operate under the assumption that its calculations will be challenged and must therefore construct a complete and contemporaneous record of its actions. This includes documenting the market data sourced, the valuation models used, any quotations sought from third parties, and the rationale for the final determination. The objective is to build a narrative that demonstrates a logical and diligent process consistent with industry norms.

![A sleek, modular institutional grade system with glowing teal conduits represents advanced RFQ protocol pathways. This illustrates high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives, facilitating private quotation and efficient liquidity aggregation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-ecosystem-powering-high-fidelity-rfq-execution-and-optimal-liquidity-discovery.jpg)

## Comparative Analysis of ISDA Standards

Understanding the strategic differences between the two ISDA agreement versions is critical for assessing contractual risk. The following table breaks down the core distinctions in the close-out calculation standards.

| Feature | 1992 ISDA Master Agreement (Loss) | 2002 ISDA Master Agreement (Close-out Amount) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Governing Standard | A standard of “rationality”. The party must “reasonably determine in good faith” its losses. | An “objective” standard. The party must use “commercially reasonable procedures to produce a commercially reasonable result”. |
| Judicial Test | The calculation is upheld unless it is arbitrary, capricious, or a decision no reasonable party could have reached. | The calculation is assessed against external, objective market standards for both the process and the outcome. |
| Discretion Level | High. The calculating party has significant latitude in its methodology and determination. | Lower and constrained. Discretion must be exercised in a way that can be objectively justified. |
| Evidentiary Burden | The challenging party must prove the calculation was irrational. | The calculating party must be prepared to prove its procedures and result were commercially reasonable. |
| Risk Of Dispute | Lower, due to the high bar for challenging the calculation. | Higher, as the objective standard provides more grounds for a challenger to argue that the procedures or result were unreasonable. |

![Intersecting digital architecture with glowing conduits symbolizes Principal's operational framework. An RFQ engine ensures high-fidelity execution of Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives, facilitating block trades, multi-leg spreads](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## What Is the Role of Good Faith?

While the 2002 agreement emphasizes objective reasonableness, the requirement to act “in [good faith](https://prime.greeks.live/area/good-faith/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)” remains. Strategically, parties should view this not as a separate, lesser standard, but as an overarching principle that informs the entire process. A procedure could, in theory, be [commercially reasonable](https://prime.greeks.live/area/commercially-reasonable/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) on its face but be applied in bad faith to achieve a punitive outcome. For instance, deliberately choosing a valuation time when markets were temporarily dislocated to maximize the counterparty’s loss could be seen as a breach of good faith, even if the valuation source itself was “reasonable.” The strategic imperative is to ensure that the entire close-out process is conducted with honesty of purpose, which in turn reinforces the commercial reasonableness of the actions taken.

![The image depicts two intersecting structural beams, symbolizing a robust Prime RFQ framework for institutional digital asset derivatives. These elements represent interconnected liquidity pools and execution pathways, crucial for high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement within market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-cross-market-execution-architecture-for-digital-assets.jpg)

![A metallic disc, reminiscent of a sophisticated market interface, features two precise pointers radiating from a glowing central hub. This visualizes RFQ protocols driving price discovery within institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-price-discovery.jpg)

## Execution

Executing a close-out calculation under the [2002 ISDA Master Agreement](https://prime.greeks.live/area/2002-isda-master-agreement/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)’s objective standard requires a rigorous, methodical, and defensible operational playbook. The focus must shift from arriving at a number to architecting a process that can withstand judicial scrutiny. Every step must be deliberate and documented, creating an auditable trail that validates the commercial reasonableness of the final determination.

![A precision algorithmic core with layered rings on a reflective surface signifies high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives. It optimizes RFQ protocols for price discovery, channeling dark liquidity within a robust Prime RFQ for capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimized-for-precision.jpg)

## The Operational Playbook for a Defensible Calculation

A non-defaulting party must implement a clear, repeatable process for calculating the Close-out Amount. This process serves as the primary evidence that “commercially reasonable procedures” were employed.

- 
**Immediate Convening of a Valuation Team** As soon as an Early Termination Date is declared, a dedicated team comprising trading, risk management, and legal personnel should be convened. This establishes a formal, controlled process from the outset.

- 
**Systematic Sourcing of Market Data** The team must gather valuation data from multiple, credible sources. This is a critical step in demonstrating objective analysis.

<li>
**Dealer Quotations** Solicit firm or indicative quotes from several active market makers in the relevant derivative. All responses, including refusals to quote, should be logged.

- 
**Electronic Platform Data** Capture data from relevant trading platforms and benchmarks, noting the time of collection.

- 
**Internal Model Valuation** If internal models are used, their inputs, methodology, and assumptions must be documented. The model should be one that is regularly used in the ordinary course of business for valuing similar transactions.

</li>
- 
**Selection of a Valuation Methodology** The determining party must choose a valuation method and justify its selection. If, for example, dealer quotes are disregarded in favor of an internal model, the rationale must be compelling, such as evidence that the quotes were not representative of the market at the time of the close-out.

- 
**Creation of a Calculation File** A comprehensive file should be created that contains all collected data, correspondence, internal notes on decisions made, the final calculation worksheet, and a narrative summary of the process. This file is the primary artifact for defending the calculation.

- 
**Issuance of the Close-out Statement** The final statement detailing the Close-out Amount should be issued with care. As courts have cast doubt on the ability to unilaterally withdraw and reissue a statement, accuracy is paramount. The statement should be reviewed by legal and compliance before being sent.

![A central split circular mechanism, half teal with liquid droplets, intersects four reflective angular planes. This abstractly depicts an institutional RFQ protocol for digital asset options, enabling principal-led liquidity provision and block trade execution with high-fidelity price discovery within a low-latency market microstructure, ensuring capital efficiency and atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-protocol-core-system-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-aggregated-liquidity.jpg)

## Quantitative Modeling and Data Analysis

The reasonableness of a result is often tied to the quality of the data used. Consider a hypothetical close-out of a 5-year interest rate swap. The determining party must calculate its loss by assessing the cost of entering into a replacement trade.

> A defensible close-out calculation is the output of a rigorous and transparent process, not merely a subjective assessment of loss.

The table below illustrates a simplified data analysis that a valuation team might undertake to demonstrate the commercial reasonableness of its final determination.

| Valuation Source | Mid-Market Mark (USD) | Cost to Replace (Offer) | Notes and Justification |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Dealer Quote A | +1,250,000 | +1,280,000 | Quote from a Tier 1 dealer. Considered a primary and reliable data point. |
| Dealer Quote B | +1,230,000 | +1,265,000 | Quote from a Tier 1 dealer. Corroborates the general market level. |
| Dealer Quote C (Outlier) | +1,050,000 | +1,100,000 | Quote is significantly lower. Noted as an outlier, potentially due to the dealer’s specific position. Given less weight. |
| Internal Model Price | +1,245,000 | +1,275,000 | Based on the firm’s standard, audited valuation model using the prevailing yield curve. Aligns closely with top-tier quotes. |
| Electronic Platform Mid | +1,248,000 | N/A | Provides a composite mid-market reference but not a transactable price. Used as a sanity check. |
| Final Determined Amount | N/A | +1,270,000 | Determined by averaging the two most credible dealer quotes and the internal model’s replacement cost, disregarding the outlier. This process is documented. |

![A symmetrical, high-tech digital infrastructure depicts an institutional-grade RFQ execution hub. Luminous conduits represent aggregated liquidity for digital asset derivatives, enabling high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-system.jpg)

## How Can a Calculation Be Challenged?

A counterparty wishing to challenge a Close-out Amount must attack the objective reasonableness of either the procedures or the result. A challenge might argue that the determining party failed to survey a representative portion of the market, relied on stale data, used an inappropriate valuation model, or ignored readily available and more favorable quotations. The success of such a challenge depends on the challenger’s ability to present evidence of what a commercially reasonable process would have looked like and the different result it would have produced. This is why the determining party’s execution and documentation are so critical; they form the first and most important line of defense.

![A dark, reflective surface displays a luminous green line, symbolizing a high-fidelity RFQ protocol channel within a Crypto Derivatives OS. This signifies precise price discovery for digital asset derivatives, ensuring atomic settlement and optimizing portfolio margin](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-pathway-optimizing-principal-liquidity-and-capital-efficiency.jpg)

## References

- Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc. v National Power Corporation and another EWHC 487 (Comm).

- Allen & Overy. “Contractual discretions ▴ when does ‘reasonable’ mean more than ‘rational’?” JDSupra, 10 May 2018.

- Travers Smith. “High Court confirms objective standard of reasonableness in the determination of the Close-out Amount.” 5 April 2018.

- Norton Rose Fulbright. “High Court clarifies calculation of Close-out amount under 2002 ISDA Master Agreement.” 22 March 2018.

- Schlam Stone & Dolan LLP. “Questions of Fact Regarding Reasonableness of Calculations Under ISDA Master Agreement Preclude Summary Judgment.” 25 July 2018.

- International Swaps and Derivatives Association. “2002 ISDA Master Agreement.”

- International Swaps and Derivatives Association. “1992 ISDA Master Agreement.”

![A transparent glass sphere rests precisely on a metallic rod, connecting a grey structural element and a dark teal engineered module with a clear lens. This symbolizes atomic settlement of digital asset derivatives via private quotation within a Prime RFQ, showcasing high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency for RFQ protocols and liquidity aggregation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/architecting-high-fidelity-execution-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-and-systemic-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## Reflection

![Three metallic, circular mechanisms represent a calibrated system for institutional-grade digital asset derivatives trading. The central dial signifies price discovery and algorithmic precision within RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-and-execution-precision.jpg)

## Fortifying Your Institutional Framework

The judicial interpretation of “commercial reasonableness” is more than a legal footnote; it is a systemic pressure test for an institution’s internal risk controls. The principles laid down by the courts compel a move away from reliance on individual discretion towards a framework of procedural integrity. This requires an honest assessment of your own operational architecture. Are your close-out procedures formalized and consistently applied?

Is your documentation sufficient to construct a complete and defensible narrative of your actions under stress? Is your team trained to understand that their actions will be measured against an objective, market-wide standard?

Viewing this not as a compliance burden but as a component of a superior operational system is key. A robust, evidence-based close-out protocol is a strategic asset. It minimizes legal and financial risk, enhances counterparty confidence, and ultimately reinforces the stability and integrity of the institution’s market-facing operations. The ultimate advantage lies not just in understanding the rules, but in building a system that executes them with precision and foresight.

![A sophisticated, symmetrical apparatus depicts an institutional-grade RFQ protocol hub for digital asset derivatives, where radiating panels symbolize liquidity aggregation across diverse market makers. Central beams illustrate real-time price discovery and high-fidelity execution of complex multi-leg spreads, ensuring atomic settlement within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-rfq-protocol-facilitating-atomic-settlement-and-high-fidelity-execution-of-multi-leg-spreads.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/commercial-reasonableness/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Two sleek, abstract forms, one dark, one light, are precisely stacked, symbolizing a multi-layered institutional trading system. This embodies sophisticated RFQ protocols, high-fidelity execution, and optimal liquidity aggregation for digital asset derivatives, ensuring robust market microstructure and capital efficiency within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-digital-asset-derivatives-platform-architecture-high-fidelity-execution-protocols-and-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## Commercial Reasonableness

Meaning ▴ Commercial reasonableness refers to the standard by which a transaction or action is judged to be consistent with prevailing market practices, industry norms, and sound business judgment, particularly concerning pricing, terms, and execution methodology. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/isda-master-agreement/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A specialized hardware component, showcasing a robust metallic heat sink and intricate circuit board, symbolizes a Prime RFQ dedicated hardware module for institutional digital asset derivatives. It embodies market microstructure enabling high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols for block trade and multi-leg spread](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/prime-os-dedicated-hardware-for-institutional-rfq-execution.jpg)

## Isda Master Agreement

Meaning ▴ The ISDA Master Agreement is a standardized contractual framework for privately negotiated over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives transactions, establishing common terms for a wide array of financial instruments. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/wednesbury-unreasonableness/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, light interface, a Principal's Prime RFQ, overlays a dark, intricate market microstructure. This represents institutional-grade digital asset derivatives trading, showcasing high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-prime-os-execution-system.jpg)

## Wednesbury Unreasonableness

Meaning ▴ Wednesbury Unreasonableness, within the context of automated financial systems, denotes a critical threshold where a system's output or a decision made by an algorithmic module deviates so extremely from rational, defensible parameters that no properly configured and logical system should have produced it. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/1992-isda-master-agreement/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Sleek, domed institutional-grade interface with glowing green and blue indicators highlights active RFQ protocols and price discovery. This signifies high-fidelity execution within a Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives, ensuring real-time liquidity and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-prime-os-execution-interface.jpg)

## 1992 Isda Master Agreement

Meaning ▴ The 1992 ISDA Master Agreement is a standardized bilateral contract document published by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, serving as the primary legal framework for over-the-counter derivative transactions between two parties. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-constitutes-a-commercially-reasonable-procedure-for-calculating-a-derivatives-close-out-amount/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A transparent, multi-faceted component, indicative of an RFQ engine's intricate market microstructure logic, emerges from complex FIX Protocol connectivity. Its sharp edges signify high-fidelity execution and price discovery precision for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimized-for-best-execution.jpg)

## Calculating Party

A commercially reasonable procedure for a derivatives close-out is a defensible, evidence-based process for valuing a terminated transaction. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-do-courts-interpret-commercially-reasonable-procedures-in-close-out-amount-calculations/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Polished concentric metallic and glass components represent an advanced Prime RFQ for institutional digital asset derivatives. It visualizes high-fidelity execution, price discovery, and order book dynamics within market microstructure, enabling efficient RFQ protocols for block trades](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-prime-os-precision.jpg)

## Commercially Reasonable Procedures

Courts interpret "commercially reasonable procedures" as an objective, evidence-based standard for valuing derivative close-outs. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-did-the-lehman-brothers-bankruptcy-influence-the-adoption-of-the-2002-isda-close-out-amount-protocol/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract geometric forms depict a Prime RFQ for institutional digital asset derivatives. A central RFQ engine drives block trades and price discovery with high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimizing-market-microstructure-for-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Lehman Brothers Special Financing

The Lehman bankruptcy catalyzed the adoption of the 2002 ISDA Protocol by proving the systemic risk of subjective, crisis-unfit valuations. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/determining-party/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Intersecting angular structures symbolize dynamic market microstructure, multi-leg spread strategies. Translucent spheres represent institutional liquidity blocks, digital asset derivatives, precisely balanced](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-platform-4.jpg)

## Determining Party

Meaning ▴ The Determining Party is the designated entity, system component, or algorithmic agent possessing the final and binding authority to initiate, validate, or conclude a specific event, transaction, or state transition within a defined operational framework. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/close-out-calculation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A symmetrical, multi-faceted digital structure, a liquidity aggregation engine, showcases translucent teal and grey panels. This visualizes diverse RFQ channels and market segments, enabling high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-liquidity-aggregation-engine-for-digital-asset-derivatives-trading.jpg)

## Close-Out Calculation

Meaning ▴ The Close-Out Calculation is the precise algorithmic determination of a final net financial obligation or entitlement arising from the termination or liquidation of one or more derivative positions, typically triggered by a pre-defined event such as a margin breach or contract expiry. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/non-defaulting-party/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A robust, dark metallic platform, indicative of an institutional-grade execution management system. Its precise, machined components suggest high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-platform-high-fidelity-price-discovery-and-atomic-settlement-infrastructure.jpg)

## Non-Defaulting Party

Meaning ▴ The Non-Defaulting Party designates the entity within a bilateral or multilateral contractual agreement, particularly in digital asset derivatives, that remains in full compliance with its obligations and terms when a counterparty fails to meet its own, thereby triggering a default event. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/objective-standard/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Visualizing a complex Institutional RFQ ecosystem, angular forms represent multi-leg spread execution pathways and dark liquidity integration. A sharp, precise point symbolizes high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives, highlighting atomic settlement within a Prime RFQ framework](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution-1.jpg)

## Objective Standard

Meaning ▴ An Objective Standard denotes a quantifiable, verifiable metric or criterion established independently of subjective judgment, utilized for consistent evaluation of system performance, operational compliance, or market state. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/close-out-amount/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Geometric planes and transparent spheres represent complex market microstructure. A central luminous core signifies efficient price discovery and atomic settlement via RFQ protocol](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-4.jpg)

## Close-Out Amount

Meaning ▴ The Close-Out Amount represents the definitive financial value required to terminate a derivatives contract or position, typically calculated upon a default event or a pre-defined termination trigger. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/commercially-reasonable/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A crystalline sphere, representing aggregated price discovery and implied volatility, rests precisely on a secure execution rail. This symbolizes a Principal's high-fidelity execution within a sophisticated digital asset derivatives framework, connecting a prime brokerage gateway to a robust liquidity pipeline, ensuring atomic settlement and minimal slippage for institutional block trades](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-platform-optimizing-liquidity-and-risk-management-through-advanced-protocols.jpg)

## Commercially Reasonable

Meaning ▴ Commercially Reasonable refers to actions, terms, or conditions that a prudent party would undertake or accept in a similar business context, aiming to achieve a desired outcome efficiently and effectively while considering prevailing market conditions, industry practices, and available alternatives. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/good-faith/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Precision cross-section of an institutional digital asset derivatives system, revealing intricate market microstructure. Toroidal halves represent interconnected liquidity pools, centrally driven by an RFQ protocol](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-architecture-revealing-precision-rfq-protocol-engine-for-optimal-high-fidelity-execution-and-latent-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## Good Faith

Meaning ▴ Good Faith, in a financial and operational context, denotes the adherence to honest intent and absence of fraudulent or deceptive conduct during contractual agreements and transactional processes. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/2002-isda-master-agreement/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract geometric design illustrating a central RFQ aggregation hub for institutional digital asset derivatives. Radiating lines symbolize high-fidelity execution via smart order routing across dark pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-high-fidelity-execution-architecture.jpg)

## 2002 Isda Master Agreement

Meaning ▴ The 2002 ISDA Master Agreement represents a standardized bilateral contractual framework for over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives transactions. </a>

**Tags:** [Determining Party](https://options.greeks.live/area/determining-party/), [ISDA Master Agreement](https://options.greeks.live/area/isda-master-agreement/), [Close-Out Amount](https://options.greeks.live/area/close-out-amount/), [Financial Litigation](https://options.greeks.live/area/financial-litigation/), [Contractual Discretion](https://options.greeks.live/area/contractual-discretion/), [Close-Out Calculation](https://options.greeks.live/area/close-out-calculation/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [Are There Scenarios Where the 1992 Isda Master Agreement Might Still Be Considered Preferable Today?](https://options.greeks.live/question/are-there-scenarios-where-the-1992-isda-master-agreement-might-still-be-considered-preferable-today/)
![Abstract visualization of an institutional-grade digital asset derivatives execution engine. Its segmented core and reflective arcs depict advanced RFQ protocols, real-time price discovery, and dynamic market microstructure, optimizing high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency for block trades within a Principal's framework.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-interface.jpg)

The 1992 ISDA Agreement is preferable when surgically isolating derivatives risk from broader counterparty defaults is the primary objective.

- 
### [How Does the 2002 ISDA’S Close-Out Amount Calculation Differ from the 1992 Version’s Loss Method?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-2002-isdas-close-out-amount-calculation-differ-from-the-1992-versions-loss-method/)
![Abstract geometric forms converge at a central point, symbolizing institutional digital asset derivatives trading. This depicts RFQ protocol aggregation and price discovery across diverse liquidity pools, ensuring high-fidelity execution. The structure reflects a robust Prime RFQ optimizing capital efficiency for multi-leg spreads.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-microstructure-core-liquidity-hub.jpg)

The 2002 ISDA's Close-Out Amount mandates an objective, commercially reasonable process using diverse inputs, replacing the 1992's subjective Loss calculation.

- 
### [What Is the Main Difference in the Close out Calculation between the 1992 and 2002 ISDA?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-main-difference-in-the-close-out-calculation-between-the-1992-and-2002-isda/)
![A sophisticated metallic mechanism with integrated translucent teal pathways on a dark background. This abstract visualizes the intricate market microstructure of an institutional digital asset derivatives platform, specifically the RFQ engine facilitating private quotation and block trade execution. It underscores high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement within a secure Prime RFQ, revealing latent liquidity and capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/systemic-framework-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-price-discovery-and-atomic-settlement.jpg)

The 2002 ISDA replaces the 1992's rigid 'Market Quotation/Loss' with a flexible, 'commercially reasonable' Close-out Amount.

- 
### [How Does the Close out Calculation Differ between the 1992 and 2002 Isda Agreements?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-close-out-calculation-differ-between-the-1992-and-2002-isda-agreements/)
![A central, dynamic, multi-bladed mechanism visualizes Algorithmic Trading engines and Price Discovery for Digital Asset Derivatives. Flanked by sleek forms signifying Latent Liquidity and Capital Efficiency, it illustrates High-Fidelity Execution via RFQ Protocols within an Institutional Grade framework, minimizing Slippage.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-market-microstructure-rfq-protocol-optimization.jpg)

The 2002 ISDA Agreement replaces the rigid 1992 'Market Quotation/Loss' with a flexible 'Close-out Amount' based on commercial reasonableness.

- 
### [How Does the Close-Out Amount in the 2002 ISDA Improve upon the 1992 Methodologies?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-close-out-amount-in-the-2002-isda-improve-upon-the-1992-methodologies/)
![A metallic, circular mechanism, a precision control interface, rests on a dark circuit board. This symbolizes the core intelligence layer of a Prime RFQ, enabling low-latency, high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives via optimized RFQ protocols, refining market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/precision-rfq-protocol-engine-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

The 2002 ISDA's Close-Out Amount replaces subjective valuation with an objective, flexible, and commercially reasonable standard.

- 
### [How Does the ISDA Master Agreement Facilitate Close-Out Netting?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-isda-master-agreement-facilitate-close-out-netting/)
![Sharp, layered planes, one deep blue, one light, intersect a luminous sphere and a vast, curved teal surface. This abstractly represents high-fidelity algorithmic trading and multi-leg spread execution. The sphere symbolizes a prime brokerage liquidity pool, interacting with latent liquidity for optimal RFQ protocol price discovery within complex market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-system-microstructure.jpg)

The ISDA Master Agreement facilitates close-out netting by creating a single contract that allows for the termination and valuation of all trades into one net payment upon default.

- 
### [How Did the 2002 ISDA Close out Amount Calculation Differ from Prior Methods?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-did-the-2002-isda-close-out-amount-calculation-differ-from-prior-methods/)
![Abstract geometric forms in muted beige, grey, and teal represent the intricate market microstructure of institutional digital asset derivatives. Sharp angles and depth symbolize high-fidelity execution and price discovery within RFQ protocols, highlighting capital efficiency and real-time risk management for multi-leg spreads on a Prime RFQ platform.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-optimized-rfq-execution-for-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

The 2002 ISDA Close-out Amount replaced rigid valuation mechanics with a flexible, commercially reasonable standard.

- 
### [What Is the Standard for Commercial Reasonability under the 2002 Isda?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-standard-for-commercial-reasonability-under-the-2002-isda/)
![Intersecting muted geometric planes, with a central glossy blue sphere. This abstract visualizes market microstructure for institutional digital asset derivatives. The sphere embodies a block trade or private quotation via RFQ protocols, ensuring high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement on a Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-5.jpg)

The standard for commercial reasonability is an objective, evidence-based framework for calculating a fair termination value.

- 
### [What Is the Process for Calculating a Close-Out Amount after a Force Majeure Termination Event?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-process-for-calculating-a-close-out-amount-after-a-force-majeure-termination-event/)
![A central precision-engineered RFQ engine orchestrates high-fidelity execution across interconnected market microstructure. This Prime RFQ node facilitates multi-leg spread pricing and liquidity aggregation for institutional digital asset derivatives, minimizing slippage.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/high-fidelity-rfq-execution-for-institutional-crypto-derivatives.jpg)

The process calculates a fair replacement value for terminated trades, integrating hedging costs and unpaid amounts into a single net settlement.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "How Do Courts Define Commercial Reasonableness in ISDA Loss Calculations?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-courts-define-commercial-reasonableness-in-isda-loss-calculations/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-courts-define-commercial-reasonableness-in-isda-loss-calculations/"
    },
    "headline": "How Do Courts Define Commercial Reasonableness in ISDA Loss Calculations? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "Courts define commercial reasonableness in ISDA calculations as an objective standard requiring both provably fair procedures and a justifiable result. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-courts-define-commercial-reasonableness-in-isda-loss-calculations/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-02T12:29:13+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-08-02T12:29:13+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-grade-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-execution-system.jpg",
        "caption": "Abstract composition of precisely engineered metallic and colored components embodies a robust institutional-grade Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives. This system optimizes RFQ protocols and private quotation for block trade execution, ensuring high-fidelity execution and best execution across complex market microstructure. It manages liquidity pools, mitigates counterparty risk, and supports advanced strategies like multi-leg spread and portfolio margin, facilitating price discovery and atomic settlement for Bitcoin options and Ethereum futures."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "1992 ISDA Master Agreement",
        "2002 ISDA",
        "2002 ISDA Master Agreement",
        "Close-Out Amount",
        "Close-Out Calculation",
        "Commercial Reasonableness",
        "Commercially Reasonable",
        "Contractual Discretion",
        "Derivatives Close-Out",
        "Determining Party",
        "Financial Litigation",
        "Good Faith",
        "ISDA Master Agreement",
        "Loss Calculation",
        "Non-Defaulting Party",
        "Objective Standard",
        "Swaps and Derivatives",
        "Wednesbury Unreasonableness"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "FAQPage",
    "mainEntity": [
        {
            "@type": "Question",
            "name": "What Is The Role Of Good Faith?",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "@type": "Answer",
                "text": "While the 2002 agreement emphasizes objective reasonableness, the requirement to act \"in good faith\" remains. Strategically, parties should view this not as a separate, lesser standard, but as an overarching principle that informs the entire process. A procedure could, in theory, be commercially reasonable on its face but be applied in bad faith to achieve a punitive outcome. For instance, deliberately choosing a valuation time when markets were temporarily dislocated to maximize the counterparty's loss could be seen as a breach of good faith, even if the valuation source itself was \"reasonable.\" The strategic imperative is to ensure that the entire close-out process is conducted with honesty of purpose, which in turn reinforces the commercial reasonableness of the actions taken."
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Question",
            "name": "How Can A Calculation Be Challenged?",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "@type": "Answer",
                "text": "A counterparty wishing to challenge a Close-out Amount must attack the objective reasonableness of either the procedures or the result. A challenge might argue that the determining party failed to survey a representative portion of the market, relied on stale data, used an inappropriate valuation model, or ignored readily available and more favorable quotations. The success of such a challenge depends on the challenger's ability to present evidence of what a commercially reasonable process would have looked like and the different result it would have produced. This is why the determining party's execution and documentation are so critical; they form the first and most important line of defense."
            }
        }
    ]
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-courts-define-commercial-reasonableness-in-isda-loss-calculations/
