# How Do Fines for MiFID II and EMIR Breaches Differ in Calculation and Severity? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-01
**Categories:** Question

---

![A precision-engineered teal metallic mechanism, featuring springs and rods, connects to a light U-shaped interface. This represents a core RFQ protocol component enabling automated price discovery and high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/rfq-execution-engine-component-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

![A sophisticated institutional digital asset derivatives platform unveils its core market microstructure. Intricate circuitry powers a central blue spherical RFQ protocol engine on a polished circular surface](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-unveiling-rfq-protocol-engine-market-microstructure-for-optimal-price-discovery-and-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Concept

An examination of penalties under the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) and the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR) reveals two distinct regulatory philosophies architected to solve different, albeit related, problems within the European financial system. The divergence in fine calculation and severity is a direct output of these foundational objectives. Understanding this is critical for any institution navigating the post-2008 regulatory architecture. The fines are not arbitrary punishments; they are calibrated instruments designed to enforce the specific behaviors each regulation was built to mandate.

MiFID II is fundamentally a framework for [market transparency](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-do-regulators-balance-the-benefits-of-dark-pools-against-the-need-for-market-transparency/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) and investor protection. Its field of view is expansive, covering the entire lifecycle of a trade across a vast array of financial instruments. A breach under MiFID II, therefore, is often a failure in conduct or transparency. This could manifest as inaccurate [transaction reporting](https://prime.greeks.live/area/transaction-reporting/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), a failure in best execution, or improper client categorization.

The regulatory response is thus calibrated to the harm done to market integrity or to a specific investor. The severity of the penalty is a function of the information asymmetry the breach created or exploited.

EMIR, conversely, possesses a singular, intense focus ▴ the mitigation of systemic counterparty and operational risk within the over-the-counter (OTC) [derivatives market](https://prime.greeks.live/area/derivatives-market/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). It was designed to prevent a catastrophic failure of a single large counterparty from cascading through the entire financial system, as was threatened during the 2008 crisis. An EMIR breach, such as a failure to report a derivative to a [trade repository](https://prime.greeks.live/area/trade-repository/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), a failure to clear a standardized derivative through a central counterparty (CCP), or a failure to apply appropriate risk mitigation techniques like collateral exchange, is viewed through the lens of systemic stability. The fine is a reflection of the quantum of unmanaged risk introduced into the system.

> The core distinction lies in the regulatory target MiFID II polices market conduct and transparency, while EMIR polices systemic risk in the derivatives market.

This fundamental difference in purpose dictates the entire enforcement apparatus. While both regimes empower National Competent Authorities (NCAs) to impose sanctions, the logic they apply is different. A MiFID II investigation might focus on the number of clients affected or the degree to which market abuse was obscured.

An EMIR investigation will concentrate on the notional value of the unreported or uncleared trades and the potential contagion effect. The severity of the fine, therefore, is not just about the size of the institution or the duration of the breach, but about which core regulatory principle was violated.

![Angular dark planes frame luminous turquoise pathways converging centrally. This visualizes institutional digital asset derivatives market microstructure, highlighting RFQ protocols for private quotation and high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-rfq-protocols-for-institutional-digital-assets.jpg)

## What Defines a Breach in Each Regime?

The nature of a “breach” is specific to the objectives of each regulation. An institution’s [compliance framework](https://prime.greeks.live/area/compliance-framework/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) must be architected to recognize these distinct failure points.

![Intricate internal machinery reveals a high-fidelity execution engine for institutional digital asset derivatives. Precision components, including a multi-leg spread mechanism and data flow conduits, symbolize a sophisticated RFQ protocol facilitating atomic settlement and robust price discovery within a principal's Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-microstructure.jpg)

## MiFID II Breach Categories

[Under MiFID](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-operational-consequences-of-misreporting-under-mifid-ii-versus-a-reporting-failure-under-emir/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) II, breaches extend across a wide spectrum of a firm’s operations, reflecting the regulation’s broad scope. Key areas include:

- **Transaction [Reporting Failures](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-can-institutions-quantify-the-financial-impact-of-failures-in-the-reporting-lifecycle/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)** ▴ This is one of the most common sources of fines. It involves the failure to report, or the inaccurate or incomplete reporting of, transaction details to an [Approved Reporting Mechanism](https://prime.greeks.live/area/approved-reporting-mechanism/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (ARM) on a T+1 basis. The scope covers 65 data fields, and errors in any of them constitute a breach.

- **[Best Execution](https://prime.greeks.live/area/best-execution/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) Violations** ▴ Firms are required to take all sufficient steps to obtain the best possible result for their clients. A failure to have adequate policies, to monitor execution quality, or to demonstrate that best execution was achieved is a significant breach.

- **Investor Protection Infringements** ▴ This category includes a range of misconduct, such as providing unsuitable advice, failing to provide clear information about costs and charges, or misclassifying clients, thereby denying them the level of protection to which they are entitled.

- **Market Transparency Rules** ▴ For trading venues and investment firms, this involves failures related to pre-trade transparency (e.g. publishing quotes) and post-trade transparency (e.g. reporting trades to an Approved Publication Arrangement (APA)).

![A multi-layered, sectioned sphere reveals core institutional digital asset derivatives architecture. Translucent layers depict dynamic RFQ liquidity pools and multi-leg spread execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-market-microstructure-1.jpg)

## EMIR Breach Categories

EMIR’s breaches are more concentrated, directly mapping to its three primary pillars for managing derivatives risk.

- **Reporting Obligation** ▴ All counterparties, both financial (FCs) and non-financial (NFCs), must report the details of any derivative contract they have concluded to a registered trade repository. Failure to report, late reporting, or inaccurate reporting are all breaches of Article 9 of EMIR.

- **[Clearing Obligation](https://prime.greeks.live/area/clearing-obligation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)** ▴ Certain classes of standardized [OTC derivatives](https://prime.greeks.live/area/otc-derivatives/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) are subject to mandatory clearing through a CCP. Financial counterparties and larger non-financial counterparties that fail to clear these designated contracts are in direct violation of a core tenet of EMIR.

- **[Risk Mitigation](https://prime.greeks.live/area/risk-mitigation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) Obligations** ▴ For non-centrally cleared OTC derivatives, firms must apply specific risk management procedures. These include timely confirmation of trade terms, portfolio reconciliation and compression, and the exchange of collateral (margin). Failure to implement these techniques constitutes a serious breach.

The operational challenge is that a single complex trade can trigger obligations under both regimes. A financial institution executing a block trade in an equity derivative for a client must correctly report the transaction under MiFID II, ensure best execution, and simultaneously report the derivative’s details under EMIR, while also determining if it needs to be cleared or margined. A failure in the data architecture can easily lead to breaches of both regulations from a single event, compounding the potential financial and reputational damage.

![Abstract intersecting geometric forms, deep blue and light beige, represent advanced RFQ protocols for institutional digital asset derivatives. These forms signify multi-leg execution strategies, principal liquidity aggregation, and high-fidelity algorithmic pricing against a textured global market sphere, reflecting robust market microstructure and intelligence layer](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-multi-leg-execution-algorithmic-pricing-global-liquidity-principal-trading-systemic-integration-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

![A luminous, miniature Earth sphere rests precariously on textured, dark electronic infrastructure with subtle moisture. This visualizes institutional digital asset derivatives trading, highlighting high-fidelity execution within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/global-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine-underpinning-institutional-market-microstructure-with-precision.jpg)

## Strategy

The strategic calculus for assessing penalties under MiFID II and EMIR requires an understanding that regulators are not simply levying fines, but are deploying economic deterrents tailored to each regime’s specific goals. The methodology, while rooted in common principles of administrative law, is applied through different analytical lenses. For a financial institution, managing regulatory risk involves modeling potential exposure based on these distinct frameworks.

![Sleek, dark components with a bright turquoise data stream symbolize a Principal OS enabling high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives. This infrastructure leverages secure RFQ protocols, ensuring precise price discovery and minimal slippage across aggregated liquidity pools, vital for multi-leg spreads](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-protocol-systemic-execution-interface.jpg)

## The MiFID II Penalty Framework a Principles-Based Approach

Fines under MiFID II are determined by National Competent Authorities (NCAs), such as BaFin in Germany or the FCA in the UK. While the MiFID II directive sets out a range of powers and sanctions, it grants NCAs considerable discretion in their application. The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) provides guidance to promote convergence, but the final calculation is a national affair. The strategic objective is to make non-compliance an economically irrational choice.

The calculation is guided by a set of qualitative and quantitative factors. There is no rigid, formulaic approach. Instead, NCAs conduct a holistic assessment.

![A central teal sphere, secured by four metallic arms on a circular base, symbolizes an RFQ protocol for institutional digital asset derivatives. It represents a controlled liquidity pool within market microstructure, enabling high-fidelity execution of block trades and managing counterparty risk through a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-hub-1.jpg)

## Key Factors in MiFID II Fine Calculation

An NCA’s decision-making process for a MiFID II breach typically weighs the following elements:

- **Gravity and Duration** ▴ How serious was the breach? Did it undermine market confidence or cause direct investor harm? How long did the misconduct persist? A systemic failure in reporting over several years will be treated more harshly than an isolated, short-lived error.

- **Financial Gain** ▴ Did the firm or any individual profit from the breach? Regulators will, at a minimum, seek to disgorge any illicit profits, with the final penalty being a multiple of this amount.

- **The Firm’s Financial Strength** ▴ The penalty must be a credible deterrent. A fine that would be crippling for a small firm might be insignificant for a global bank. NCAs explicitly consider a firm’s revenue and overall financial position to ensure the penalty has the intended impact.

- **Degree of Responsibility** ▴ Was the breach intentional, reckless, or merely negligent? Evidence of a deliberate attempt to circumvent rules will lead to a much higher penalty.

- **Cooperation with the Regulator** ▴ Firms that self-report a breach, cooperate fully with the investigation, and take prompt remedial action can often receive a significant reduction in the proposed fine. Proactive engagement is a critical mitigating strategy.

![Central institutional Prime RFQ, a segmented sphere, anchors digital asset derivatives liquidity. Intersecting beams signify high-fidelity RFQ protocols for multi-leg spread execution, price discovery, and counterparty risk mitigation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-cross-asset-rfq-execution-hub.jpg)

## The EMIR Penalty Framework a Focus on Systemic Containment

EMIR penalties are also imposed by NCAs, but the philosophical underpinning is different. The primary concern is the containment of [systemic risk](https://prime.greeks.live/area/systemic-risk/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). Therefore, the severity of a breach is directly correlated with the degree of risk it introduces into the financial ecosystem. A failure to report a single large, complex derivative contract with a systemically important counterparty could be deemed more severe than thousands of small reporting errors on less risky trades.

![A precision-engineered metallic and glass system depicts the core of an Institutional Grade Prime RFQ, facilitating high-fidelity execution for Digital Asset Derivatives. Transparent layers represent visible liquidity pools and the intricate market microstructure supporting RFQ protocol processing, ensuring atomic settlement capabilities](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/robust-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-platform-for-optimized-rfq-protocol-execution-and-deep-liquidity-access.jpg)

## Key Factors in EMIR Fine Calculation

The assessment for an EMIR breach includes many of the same principles as MiFID II, but with a distinct emphasis:

- **Impact on Market Transparency** ▴ For reporting breaches, the key question is the extent to which the failure obscured regulators’ view of risk concentrations. Failing to report trades in a particular asset class where systemic risk is believed to be building will be viewed very seriously.

- **Increase in [Counterparty Risk](https://prime.greeks.live/area/counterparty-risk/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)** ▴ For failures in clearing or risk mitigation, the calculation is more direct. The regulator will assess the quantum of uncollateralized counterparty risk the firm was running. This can be measured by the notional value of the trades, their duration, and the creditworthiness of the counterparties involved.

- **Repetitive Nature of the Breach** ▴ As with MiFID II, repeat offenses are punished more severely. A firm that has been previously warned about its EMIR reporting quality will face a much larger fine for subsequent failures.

- **Systemic Importance of the Firm** ▴ A breach at a large, interconnected financial institution has a greater potential for contagion. Such firms are held to a higher standard and can expect larger penalties for similar failings compared to smaller entities.

> A MiFID II fine is often calibrated against investor harm or market disruption, whereas an EMIR fine is calibrated against the unmanaged systemic risk introduced into the derivatives market.

![An intricate mechanical assembly reveals the market microstructure of an institutional-grade RFQ protocol engine. It visualizes high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives block trades, managing counterparty risk and multi-leg spread strategies within a liquidity pool, embodying a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-architecture.jpg)

## Comparative Analysis of Penalty Regimes

To architect an effective compliance and risk management framework, it is essential to map the differences in these regulatory approaches. The following table provides a strategic comparison of the penalty calculation systems.

| Parameter | MiFID II Penalty Regime | EMIR Penalty Regime |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Primary Regulatory Objective | Enhance market transparency, protect investors, and ensure fair and orderly trading in a wide range of financial instruments. | Reduce systemic risk, improve transparency, and standardize the OTC derivatives market. |
| Core Focus of Penalty | Harm to investors, impact on market integrity, and economic benefit derived from the breach. | Magnitude of unmitigated counterparty risk and the extent to which regulatory oversight of systemic risk was impeded. |
| Example of a High-Severity Breach | Systematic failure to provide best execution to retail clients over several years, leading to significant collective detriment. | Failure by a major bank to clear a large portfolio of mandated interest rate swaps, creating a significant, uncollateralized exposure. |
| Typical Aggravating Factors | Intentional misconduct, misleading the regulator, significant harm to a large number of clients, senior management involvement. | Large notional value of affected trades, involvement of systemically important counterparties, failure to heed prior warnings. |
| Typical Mitigating Factors | Self-reporting the breach, full cooperation with the investigation, prompt remediation of systems and controls, providing redress to affected clients. | Voluntary and timely correction of reporting errors, proactive engagement with the regulator on interpretation issues, robust internal controls that failed in an isolated manner. |
| Role of Criminal Sanctions | More likely for breaches involving market abuse (insider dealing, market manipulation) which are covered under the Market Abuse Regulation (MAR) but often investigated alongside MiFID II failings. | Less common, but possible in some jurisdictions for severe, intentional breaches that threaten financial stability. |

![A complex abstract digital rendering depicts intersecting geometric planes and layered circular elements, symbolizing a sophisticated RFQ protocol for institutional digital asset derivatives. The central glowing network suggests intricate market microstructure and price discovery mechanisms, ensuring high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement within a prime brokerage framework for capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-execution-5.jpg)

![A precise lens-like module, symbolizing high-fidelity execution and market microstructure insight, rests on a sharp blade, representing optimal smart order routing. Curved surfaces depict distinct liquidity pools within an institutional-grade Prime RFQ, enabling efficient RFQ for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-via-rfq-protocols.jpg)

## Execution

The transition from understanding the strategic differences between MiFID II and EMIR penalties to executing a robust compliance framework requires a deep, procedural understanding of the enforcement process and a quantitative grasp of potential exposures. This involves dissecting the anatomy of a regulatory fine and modeling the financial impact of specific breach scenarios.

![A geometric abstraction depicts a central multi-segmented disc intersected by angular teal and white structures, symbolizing a sophisticated Principal-driven RFQ protocol engine. This represents high-fidelity execution, optimizing price discovery across diverse liquidity pools for institutional digital asset derivatives like Bitcoin options, ensuring atomic settlement and mitigating counterparty risk](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-for-prime-os.jpg)

## The Anatomy of a Regulatory Fine a Procedural Breakdown

The path from a compliance failure to a public penalty notice follows a structured, albeit often lengthy, process. Understanding these steps is critical for a firm’s legal and compliance teams to manage the response effectively.

- **Detection and Identification** ▴ A breach can be identified through several channels. NCAs use sophisticated data analytics on the information submitted to trade repositories and ARMs to spot anomalies and outliers. Other sources include direct thematic reviews of firms, whistleblowers, or, ideally, a firm’s own internal audit and control functions.

- **Preliminary Investigation** ▴ The NCA will typically contact the firm with information requests to understand the nature and scope of the potential breach. This is a critical phase where the firm’s initial response and transparency can set the tone for the entire process.

- **Formal Investigation** ▴ If the preliminary findings are serious, a formal investigation is launched. This grants the regulator powers to compel testimony, conduct on-site inspections, and demand extensive documentation.

- **Issuance of Preliminary Findings** ▴ The investigation team will present its findings and a proposed penalty to the firm. This is not a final decision.

- **Settlement or Contestation** ▴ The firm has a choice. It can enter into settlement negotiations, where it may agree to the findings and the penalty, often in exchange for a discount (typically around 30%). Alternatively, it can contest the findings before a regulatory decisions committee or an administrative tribunal. Contesting is a costly and uncertain process.

- **Final Notice and Publication** ▴ Once a decision is final, either through settlement or adjudication, the NCA publishes a Final Notice. This document details the breach, the reasoning for the penalty, and the final amount. This publication causes significant reputational damage, which can often be more costly than the fine itself.

![Two abstract, segmented forms intersect, representing dynamic RFQ protocol interactions and price discovery mechanisms. The layered structures symbolize liquidity aggregation across multi-leg spreads within complex market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-microstructure.jpg)

## Quantitative Analysis of Historical Fines

An analysis of past enforcement actions provides the most concrete data on the severity of penalties. While fines vary by jurisdiction and the specifics of the case, a clear pattern emerges ▴ regulators are willing to impose substantial fines for data reporting failures under both regimes.

| Firm | Regulation | Fine Amount (Original Currency) | Year | Regulator | Nature of Breach |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Merrill Lynch International | EMIR | £34,500,000 | 2017 | FCA (UK) | Failure to report 68.5 million exchange-traded derivative transactions over two years. |
| UBS AG | MiFID II | £27,600,000 | 2019 | FCA (UK) | Transaction reporting errors across 135.9 million transactions over a decade. |
| Goldman Sachs International | MiFID II | £34,300,000 | 2019 | FCA (UK) | Reporting failures affecting over 220 million transactions over a ten-year period. |
| Commerzbank AG | MiFID II | €650,000 | 2020 | BaFin (Germany) | Violations of MiFID II organizational requirements and rules of conduct. |
| Covip (Italian Pension Fund Supervisor) | EMIR | €105,000 & €60,000 | 2017 | Covip (Italy) | Two separate fines for breaches of EMIR Articles 9 (Reporting) and 11 (Risk Mitigation). |

This data illustrates that while UK regulators have imposed particularly large fines for reporting failures, other NCAs are also active. The fines are material and demonstrate that data reporting is a high-priority area for enforcement across Europe.

![Precision metallic pointers converge on a central blue mechanism. This symbolizes Market Microstructure of Institutional Grade Digital Asset Derivatives, depicting High-Fidelity Execution and Price Discovery via RFQ protocols, ensuring Capital Efficiency and Atomic Settlement for Multi-Leg Spreads](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-for-precision-execution.jpg)

## How Is a Fine’s Severity Ultimately Determined?

The final penalty is a product of a structured calculation, often involving a multi-step process. Using the UK’s FCA as a model, the process typically involves:

- **Step 1 ▴ Disgorgement.** The starting point is to remove any financial benefit the firm derived from the breach.

- **Step 2 ▴ Base Figure.** A figure representing the seriousness of the breach is calculated. For reporting failures, this might be based on the number of incorrect reports or the duration. For other breaches, it might be linked to the firm’s revenue from the relevant business area.

- **Step 3 ▴ Adjustment for Aggravating and Mitigating Factors.** The base figure is adjusted upwards or downwards based on the firm’s conduct during and after the breach. Cooperation and remediation lead to reductions; obstruction or recklessness lead to increases.

- **Step 4 ▴ Serious and Deterrent Uplift.** The regulator ensures the fine is large enough to send a clear message to the firm and the wider market that such conduct is unacceptable.

- **Step 5 ▴ Settlement Discount.** If the firm agrees to settle early in the process, a discount (often up to 30%) is applied to the final amount.

> The execution of a compliance strategy must be built on the reality that regulatory data is actively analyzed, and penalties are structured to be both punitive and a public deterrent.

![Dark precision apparatus with reflective spheres, central unit, parallel rails. Visualizes institutional-grade Crypto Derivatives OS for RFQ block trade execution, driving liquidity aggregation and algorithmic price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-system.jpg)

## Architecting a Mitigation Framework

Avoiding these penalties requires a specific technological and governance architecture. A passive compliance stance is insufficient; firms must proactively manage their reporting and risk obligations.

![An abstract visual depicts a central intelligent execution hub, symbolizing the core of a Principal's operational framework. Two intersecting planes represent multi-leg spread strategies and cross-asset liquidity pools, enabling private quotation and aggregated inquiry for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocol-engine-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

## Technological Systems

- **Data Aggregation and Normalization** ▴ The system must be able to pull data from multiple trading systems (OMS, EMS) and normalize it into the required format for MiFID II and EMIR reports.

- **Validation and Enrichment Engine** ▴ Before submission, every report should pass through a rules engine that validates the data for completeness and accuracy against the regulatory technical standards. It should also enrich the data where necessary (e.g. adding LEIs for counterparties).

- **Reconciliation Tools** ▴ The system must reconcile the data submitted to regulators with the firm’s own internal records. For EMIR, it must also reconcile its view of a trade with its counterparty’s view, as reported to the trade repository, to identify pairing and matching errors.

- **Exception Management Workflow** ▴ When an error is detected, the system must automatically create an alert and route it to the correct compliance or operations team member for investigation and remediation.

![A central blue sphere, representing a Liquidity Pool, balances on a white dome, the Prime RFQ. Perpendicular beige and teal arms, embodying RFQ protocols and Multi-Leg Spread strategies, extend to four peripheral blue elements](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-framework.jpg)

## Governance Framework

Technology alone is not a solution. It must be wrapped in a robust governance framework.

- **Clear Ownership** ▴ There must be clear accountability for the quality of regulatory reporting, from the front office that executes the trade to the C-suite executive who signs off on the compliance program.

- **Regular Testing and Audits** ▴ The entire reporting process should be subject to regular, independent testing to ensure it is functioning as designed.

- **Continuous Training** ▴ Staff in all relevant roles must be trained on their regulatory obligations and how the firm’s systems are designed to meet them.

Ultimately, the execution of a successful compliance strategy for MiFID II and EMIR is an exercise in systems architecture. It requires the integration of technology, processes, and governance to create a resilient and verifiable system of controls that can withstand regulatory scrutiny and prevent the breaches that lead to severe financial and reputational penalties.

![Abstract geometric representation of an institutional RFQ protocol for digital asset derivatives. Two distinct segments symbolize cross-market liquidity pools and order book dynamics](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-protocol-2.jpg)

## References

- SteelEye. “EMIR Vs MiFID II ▴ How do they compare?”. SteelEye, 10 June 2021.

- Point Nine. “EMIR vs. MiFID ▴ What is the Difference?”. Point Nine, 29 September 2019.

- Cappitech. “EMIR, MiFID, and Dodd-Frank ▴ What have we learned and what comes next?”. Cappitech, 22 November 2024.

- SteelEye. “Derivative rules ▴ EMIR Reporting challenges mirror MiFID II struggle”. SteelEye, 28 October 2019.

- European Securities and Markets Authority. “ESMA reports on EMIR supervisory measures and penalties”. ESMA, 13 June 2018.

- Harris, Larry. Trading and Exchanges ▴ Market Microstructure for Practitioners. Oxford University Press, 2003.

- O’Hara, Maureen. Market Microstructure Theory. Blackwell Publishers, 1995.

- UK Financial Conduct Authority. “FCA Decision Making and Penalties”. FCA Handbook, DEPP section.

![A translucent teal triangle, an RFQ protocol interface with target price visualization, rises from radiating multi-leg spread components. This depicts Prime RFQ driven liquidity aggregation for institutional-grade Digital Asset Derivatives trading, ensuring high-fidelity execution and price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-intelligence-layer-driving-rfq-protocol-enhanced-digital-asset-derivatives-liquidity-aggregation-and-best-execution.jpg)

## Reflection

The architectural divergence between MiFID II and EMIR’s penalty frameworks is a deliberate design choice reflecting a dual regulatory mandate ▴ policing market conduct and containing systemic risk. The knowledge of how these fines are calculated and applied is more than a compliance exercise. It is a critical input into the design of an institution’s operational nervous system. The severity of these penalties compels a shift in perspective, from viewing regulatory reporting as a cost center to understanding it as a core function of risk management.

How does your firm’s current technological and governance architecture reflect this dual mandate? Is your system designed merely to submit data, or is it engineered to provide verifiable proof of transparency and risk mitigation? The answers to these questions define the boundary between passive compliance and the active management of regulatory risk. The ultimate strategic advantage lies not in simply avoiding fines, but in building a framework so robust and transparent that it becomes a source of institutional strength and client confidence.

![Abstract depiction of an institutional digital asset derivatives execution system. A central market microstructure wheel supports a Prime RFQ framework, revealing an algorithmic trading engine for high-fidelity execution of multi-leg spreads and block trades via advanced RFQ protocols, optimizing capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-rfq-execution-system-1.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/transaction-reporting/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A metallic disc, reminiscent of a sophisticated market interface, features two precise pointers radiating from a glowing central hub. This visualizes RFQ protocols driving price discovery within institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-price-discovery.jpg)

## Transaction Reporting

Meaning ▴ Transaction Reporting defines the formal process of submitting granular trade data, encompassing execution specifics and counterparty information, to designated regulatory authorities or internal oversight frameworks. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-do-regulators-balance-the-benefits-of-dark-pools-against-the-need-for-market-transparency/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, dark reflective sphere is precisely intersected by two flat, light-toned blades, creating an intricate cross-sectional design. This visually represents institutional digital asset derivatives' market microstructure, where RFQ protocols enable high-fidelity execution and price discovery within dark liquidity pools, ensuring capital efficiency and managing counterparty risk via advanced Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-market-microstructure.jpg)

## Market Transparency

Regulators balance dark pools and transparency by mandating post-trade reporting while using volume caps to preserve public price discovery. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/derivatives-market/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![An abstract, reflective metallic form with intertwined elements on a gradient. This visualizes Market Microstructure of Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives, highlighting Liquidity Pool aggregation, High-Fidelity Execution, and precise Price Discovery via RFQ protocols for efficient Block Trade on a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-market-microstructure-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Derivatives Market

Meaning ▴ The Derivatives Market constitutes a sophisticated financial ecosystem where participants trade standardized contracts whose intrinsic value is systematically derived from the performance of an underlying asset, index, or rate. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/trade-repository/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A central, symmetrical, multi-faceted mechanism with four radiating arms, crafted from polished metallic and translucent blue-green components, represents an institutional-grade RFQ protocol engine. Its intricate design signifies multi-leg spread algorithmic execution for liquidity aggregation, ensuring atomic settlement within crypto derivatives OS market microstructure for prime brokerage clients](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-rfq-engine-for-crypto-derivatives-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## Trade Repository

Meaning ▴ A Trade Repository is a centralized data facility established to collect and maintain records of over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives transactions. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/compliance-framework/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sophisticated metallic mechanism with a central pivoting component and parallel structural elements, indicative of a precision engineered RFQ engine. Polished surfaces and visible fasteners suggest robust algorithmic trading infrastructure for high-fidelity execution and latency optimization](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-mechanism-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-and-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Compliance Framework

Meaning ▴ A Compliance Framework constitutes a structured set of policies, procedures, and controls engineered to ensure an organization's adherence to relevant laws, regulations, internal rules, and ethical standards. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-operational-consequences-of-misreporting-under-mifid-ii-versus-a-reporting-failure-under-emir/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Precisely balanced blue spheres on a beam and angular fulcrum, atop a white dome. This signifies RFQ protocol optimization for institutional digital asset derivatives, ensuring high-fidelity execution, price discovery, capital efficiency, and systemic equilibrium in multi-leg spreads](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/systemic-equilibrium-in-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols.jpg)

## Under Mifid

A MiFID II misreport corrupts market surveillance data; an EMIR failure hides systemic risk, creating distinct operational and reputational threats. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/approved-reporting-mechanism/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract visualization of an institutional-grade digital asset derivatives execution engine. Its segmented core and reflective arcs depict advanced RFQ protocols, real-time price discovery, and dynamic market microstructure, optimizing high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency for block trades within a Principal's framework](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-interface.jpg)

## Approved Reporting Mechanism

Meaning ▴ Approved Reporting Mechanism (ARM) denotes a regulated entity authorized to collect, validate, and submit transaction reports to competent authorities on behalf of investment firms. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-can-institutions-quantify-the-financial-impact-of-failures-in-the-reporting-lifecycle/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Precision instrument with multi-layered dial, symbolizing price discovery and volatility surface calibration. Its metallic arm signifies an algorithmic trading engine, enabling high-fidelity execution for RFQ block trades, minimizing slippage within an institutional Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-platform-calibrating-rfq-protocols-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-market-microstructure-optimization.jpg)

## Reporting Failures

Quantifying reporting failure impact involves modeling direct costs, reputational damage, and market risks to inform capital allocation. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/best-execution/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Three metallic, circular mechanisms represent a calibrated system for institutional-grade digital asset derivatives trading. The central dial signifies price discovery and algorithmic precision within RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-and-execution-precision.jpg)

## Best Execution

Meaning ▴ Best Execution is the obligation to obtain the most favorable terms reasonably available for a client's order. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/clearing-obligation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract, layered spheres symbolize complex market microstructure and liquidity pools. A central reflective conduit represents RFQ protocols enabling block trade execution and precise price discovery for multi-leg spread strategies, ensuring high-fidelity execution within institutional trading of digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-for-high-fidelity.jpg)

## Clearing Obligation

Meaning ▴ The Clearing Obligation represents the regulatory mandate requiring certain standardized over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives transactions to be submitted to a Central Counterparty (CCP) for clearing. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/otc-derivatives/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precisely engineered central blue hub anchors segmented grey and blue components, symbolizing a robust Prime RFQ for institutional trading of digital asset derivatives. This structure represents a sophisticated RFQ protocol engine, optimizing liquidity pool aggregation and price discovery through advanced market microstructure for high-fidelity execution and private quotation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/prime-os-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-core-systemic-hub.jpg)

## Otc Derivatives

Meaning ▴ OTC Derivatives are bilateral financial contracts executed directly between two counterparties, outside the regulated environment of a centralized exchange. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/risk-mitigation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sharp, teal blade precisely dissects a cylindrical conduit. This visualizes surgical high-fidelity execution of block trades for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-precision-execution-microstructure.jpg)

## Risk Mitigation

Meaning ▴ Risk Mitigation involves the systematic application of controls and strategies designed to reduce the probability or impact of adverse events on a system's operational integrity or financial performance. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/systemic-risk/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A complex, intersecting arrangement of sleek, multi-colored blades illustrates institutional-grade digital asset derivatives trading. This visual metaphor represents a sophisticated Prime RFQ facilitating RFQ protocols, aggregating dark liquidity, and enabling high-fidelity execution for multi-leg spreads, optimizing capital efficiency and mitigating counterparty risk](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/sophisticated-multi-asset-rfq-architecture-visualizing-institutional-digital-derivatives-execution-liquidity-aggregation-and-prime-os-orchestration-for-high-fidelity-performance.jpg)

## Systemic Risk

Meaning ▴ Systemic risk denotes the potential for a localized failure within a financial system to propagate and trigger a cascade of subsequent failures across interconnected entities, leading to the collapse of the entire system. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/counterparty-risk/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A segmented rod traverses a multi-layered spherical structure, depicting a streamlined Institutional RFQ Protocol. This visual metaphor illustrates optimal Digital Asset Derivatives price discovery, high-fidelity execution, and robust liquidity pool integration, minimizing slippage and ensuring atomic settlement for multi-leg spreads within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-flow-1.jpg)

## Counterparty Risk

Meaning ▴ Counterparty risk denotes the potential for financial loss stemming from a counterparty's failure to fulfill its contractual obligations in a transaction. </a>

**Tags:** [Trade Repository](https://options.greeks.live/area/trade-repository/), [Regulatory Enforcement](https://options.greeks.live/area/regulatory-enforcement/), [OTC Derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/area/otc-derivatives/), [EMIR Fine Calculation](https://options.greeks.live/area/emir-fine-calculation/), [Best Execution](https://options.greeks.live/area/best-execution/), [Risk Mitigation](https://options.greeks.live/area/risk-mitigation/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [What Are the Consequences for an Investment Firm of Incorrectly Reporting to an Apa or an Arm?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-consequences-for-an-investment-firm-of-incorrectly-reporting-to-an-apa-or-an-arm/)
![Polished metallic disks, resembling data platters, with a precise mechanical arm poised for high-fidelity execution. This embodies an institutional digital asset derivatives platform, optimizing RFQ protocol for efficient price discovery, managing market microstructure, and leveraging a Prime RFQ intelligence layer to minimize execution latency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-precision-execution-via-advanced-rfq-protocols-and-prime-os-intelligence-layer-for-optimal-market-microstructure.jpg)

Incorrect reporting to an APA or ARM triggers severe financial, reputational, and regulatory consequences, undermining market integrity.

- 
### [What Are the Key Differences in Counterparty Risk Management between Centralized and Decentralized Crypto Options?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-in-counterparty-risk-management-between-centralized-and-decentralized-crypto-options/)
![Glowing teal conduit symbolizes high-fidelity execution pathways and real-time market microstructure data flow for digital asset derivatives. Smooth grey spheres represent aggregated liquidity pools and robust counterparty risk management within a Prime RFQ, enabling optimal price discovery.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-market-microstructure-prime-os.jpg)

Centralized options rely on intermediary solvency; decentralized options depend on protocol integrity and smart contract determinism.

- 
### [What Are the Primary Differences between an ARM’S and a Firm’s Validation Checks?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-differences-between-an-arms-and-a-firms-validation-checks/)
![A precision-engineered institutional digital asset derivatives execution system cutaway. The teal Prime RFQ casing reveals intricate market microstructure. Bright blue internal elements represent dynamic liquidity pools, enabling high-fidelity execution and efficient RFQ protocols for multi-leg spread strategies.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-rfq-protocol-core-engine.jpg)

An ARM's validation is a final, technical check for regulatory compliance, while a firm's validation is a continuous, internal process of risk management.

- 
### [How Do Regulatory Frameworks Influence Quote Validation Standards across Asset Classes?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-regulatory-frameworks-influence-quote-validation-standards-across-asset-classes/)
![Curved, segmented surfaces in blue, beige, and teal, with a transparent cylindrical element against a dark background. This abstractly depicts volatility surfaces and market microstructure, facilitating high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols for digital asset derivatives, enabling price discovery and revealing latent liquidity for institutional trading.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/optimized-rfq-protocol-dynamics-for-institutional-crypto-derivatives.jpg)

Regulatory frameworks calibrate quote validation from automated price-matching in transparent markets to principles-based diligence in opaque ones.

- 
### [How Does Central Clearing Enhance the Benefits of Contract Standardization?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-central-clearing-enhance-the-benefits-of-contract-standardization/)
![Central teal cylinder, representing a Prime RFQ engine, intersects a dark, reflective, segmented surface. This abstractly depicts institutional digital asset derivatives price discovery, ensuring high-fidelity execution for block trades and liquidity aggregation within market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-core-framework.jpg)

Central clearing transforms standardized contracts into a secure, capital-efficient market system by mutualizing counterparty risk.

- 
### [What Are the Main Differences between a Regulated Block Trade and a Traditional Otc Trade?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-main-differences-between-a-regulated-block-trade-and-a-traditional-otc-trade/)
![A polished, dark blue domed component, symbolizing a private quotation interface, rests on a gleaming silver ring. This represents a robust Prime RFQ framework, enabling high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives. It facilitates block trades with optimized capital efficiency and minimal slippage via a sophisticated RFQ protocol.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/optimized-execution-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq.jpg)

Regulated block trades leverage structured exchange oversight, offering controlled discretion, while traditional OTC trades provide bilateral customization with direct counterparty risk.

- 
### [What Are the Primary Drivers of Counterparty Risk in OTC Derivatives Markets?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-drivers-of-counterparty-risk-in-otc-derivatives-markets/)
![Stacked precision-engineered circular components, varying in size and color, rest on a cylindrical base. This modular assembly symbolizes a robust Crypto Derivatives OS architecture, enabling high-fidelity execution for institutional RFQ protocols. It embodies layered liquidity aggregation, optimized price discovery within market microstructure, and capital efficiency for digital asset derivatives.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-protocol-architecture-optimized-for-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

Counterparty risk is the engineered variable in the OTC market's architecture, driven by credit quality, market structure, and legal frameworks.

- 
### [How Can a Trading Desk Operationally Shift Exposure Away from High-Risk Counterparties without Disrupting the Portfolio?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-a-trading-desk-operationally-shift-exposure-away-from-high-risk-counterparties-without-disrupting-the-portfolio/)
![A stylized RFQ protocol engine, featuring a central price discovery mechanism and a high-fidelity execution blade. Translucent blue conduits symbolize atomic settlement pathways for institutional block trades within a Crypto Derivatives OS, ensuring capital efficiency and best execution.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-rfq-execution-for-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

A trading desk shifts risk by using novation, clearing, and collateralization to replace or secure high-risk exposures.

- 
### [Eliminate Slippage the Definitive Block Trading Strategy](https://options.greeks.live/guide/eliminate-slippage-the-definitive-block-trading-strategy/)
![A centralized intelligence layer for institutional digital asset derivatives, visually connected by translucent RFQ protocols. This Prime RFQ facilitates high-fidelity execution and private quotation for block trades, optimizing liquidity aggregation and price discovery. It ensures capital efficiency and systemic resilience within complex market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine.jpg)

Eliminate slippage and command institutional-grade liquidity. This is the operator's guide to definitive block trading.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "How Do Fines for MiFID II and EMIR Breaches Differ in Calculation and Severity?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-fines-for-mifid-ii-and-emir-breaches-differ-in-calculation-and-severity/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-fines-for-mifid-ii-and-emir-breaches-differ-in-calculation-and-severity/"
    },
    "headline": "How Do Fines for MiFID II and EMIR Breaches Differ in Calculation and Severity? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "MiFID II fines target market conduct and investor harm, while EMIR fines are calibrated to the systemic risk of derivatives breaches. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-fines-for-mifid-ii-and-emir-breaches-differ-in-calculation-and-severity/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-01T22:15:39+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-08-01T22:15:42+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/architecting-high-fidelity-execution-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-and-systemic-liquidity-aggregation.jpg",
        "caption": "A transparent glass sphere is precisely balanced on a metallic rod, bridging an abstract grey structural element and a detailed dark teal engineered module with a clear lens. This composition visually articulates the intricate market microstructure and algorithmic precision underpinning institutional digital asset derivatives trading. It signifies high-fidelity execution of multi-leg spread strategies and private quotation via advanced RFQ protocols within a robust Prime RFQ. The scene emphasizes capital efficiency, minimal slippage, and controlled gamma exposure through optimized smart order routing and dark liquidity access, vital for alpha generation and counterparty risk mitigation."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Approved Reporting Mechanism",
        "Best Execution",
        "Best Execution Violation",
        "Clearing Obligation",
        "Compliance Framework",
        "Counterparty Risk",
        "Derivatives Market",
        "EMIR Fine Calculation",
        "ESMA Guidelines",
        "Financial Conduct Authority",
        "MiFID II Penalties",
        "National Competent Authority",
        "OTC Derivatives",
        "Regulatory Enforcement",
        "Regulatory Sanctions",
        "Risk Mitigation",
        "Systemic Risk",
        "Systemic Risk Mitigation",
        "Trade Repository",
        "Transaction Reporting",
        "Transaction Reporting Failure"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "FAQPage",
    "mainEntity": [
        {
            "@type": "Question",
            "name": "What Defines A Breach In Each Regime?",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "@type": "Answer",
                "text": "The nature of a \"breach\" is specific to the objectives of each regulation. An institution's compliance framework must be architected to recognize these distinct failure points."
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Question",
            "name": "How Is A Fine's Severity Ultimately Determined?",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "@type": "Answer",
                "text": "The final penalty is a product of a structured calculation, often involving a multi-step process. Using the UK's FCA as a model, the process typically involves:"
            }
        }
    ]
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-fines-for-mifid-ii-and-emir-breaches-differ-in-calculation-and-severity/
