# How Do MiFID II and FINRA Rules Differ on Best Execution for RFQs? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-05
**Categories:** Question

---

![Sharp, layered planes, one deep blue, one light, intersect a luminous sphere and a vast, curved teal surface. This abstractly represents high-fidelity algorithmic trading and multi-leg spread execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-system-microstructure.jpg)

![A metallic rod, symbolizing a high-fidelity execution pipeline, traverses transparent elements representing atomic settlement nodes and real-time price discovery. It rests upon distinct institutional liquidity pools, reflecting optimized RFQ protocols for crypto derivatives trading across a complex volatility surface within Prime RFQ market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trade-execution-pipeline-optimizing-rfq-protocols-for-best-execution-and-capital-efficiency.jpg)

## Concept

An execution protocol, at its core, is a system of choices. For a global trading desk, the [Request for Quote](https://prime.greeks.live/area/request-for-quote/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (RFQ) mechanism represents a critical pathway for sourcing liquidity, particularly for large or esoteric positions where lit markets are insufficient. The operational challenge arises when this single protocol must function within two deeply divergent regulatory architectures ▴ the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) in Europe and the framework governed by the [Financial Industry Regulatory Authority](https://prime.greeks.live/area/financial-industry-regulatory-authority/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (FINRA) in the United States.

Understanding their differences is an exercise in systemic analysis. These are two distinct blueprints for market integrity and investor protection, each with its own logic, evidentiary requirements, and philosophical approach to defining “[best execution](https://prime.greeks.live/area/best-execution/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite).”

For the systems architect, the question is not merely one of compliance. It is about designing a trading and data infrastructure that can seamlessly navigate both environments without compromising efficiency or incurring regulatory sanction. [MiFID II](https://prime.greeks.live/area/mifid-ii/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), born from a desire for granular transparency across the European Union, imposes a prescriptive and data-intensive framework. It compels firms to prove, with quantitative evidence, that they have taken “[all sufficient steps](https://prime.greeks.live/area/all-sufficient-steps/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)” to achieve the best possible result.

This transforms the [RFQ process](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfq-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) from a simple price discovery tool into a data-gathering exercise. The system must capture not just the winning bid, but the entire context of the inquiry ▴ why specific counterparties were chosen, the speed of response, and the likelihood of execution, all benchmarked against a wide array of potential execution venues.

> A firm’s ability to demonstrate best execution is a direct reflection of the sophistication of its data capture and analysis architecture.

FINRA’s approach, conversely, is rooted in a principles-based standard of “reasonable diligence.” While no less stringent, it places a greater emphasis on the firm’s policies and procedures. The evidentiary burden is more qualitative, centered on demonstrating that the firm conducted a “regular and rigorous” review of execution quality. For an RFQ, this means the system must justify its [counterparty selection](https://prime.greeks.live/area/counterparty-selection/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) process and prove that the resulting price was fair [under prevailing market conditions](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-can-a-firm-quantitatively-demonstrate-that-its-quotes-reflect-prevailing-market-conditions/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). The focus is less on an exhaustive comparison of all possible venues for every trade and more on the soundness of the firm’s overall execution methodology.

These foundational differences in philosophy dictate dramatically different requirements for system design, data retention, and the analytical models used to validate [execution quality](https://prime.greeks.live/area/execution-quality/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). The challenge, therefore, is to build a unified execution system that satisfies both the quantitative, evidence-based demands of MiFID II and the qualitative, process-oriented scrutiny of FINRA.

![A sleek conduit, embodying an RFQ protocol and smart order routing, connects two distinct, semi-spherical liquidity pools. Its transparent core signifies an intelligence layer for algorithmic trading and high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives, ensuring atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-engine-bridging-diverse-liquidity-pools-via-high-fidelity-rfq-protocol-orchestration.jpg)

![The image features layered structural elements, representing diverse liquidity pools and market segments within a Principal's operational framework. A sharp, reflective plane intersects, symbolizing high-fidelity execution and price discovery via private quotation protocols for institutional digital asset derivatives, emphasizing atomic settlement nodes](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/systemic-interplay-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-via-advanced-rfq-protocols.jpg)

## Strategy

Strategically navigating the best execution requirements for RFQs [under MiFID](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-specific-data-reporting-requirements-for-execution-venues-under-mifid-ii-rts-27/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) II and FINRA demands two distinct operational postures. The core objective remains the same ▴ to achieve and evidence the best possible outcome for a client. However, the pathways to this objective are dictated by the unique strategic thrust of each regulatory framework. A successful strategy involves designing a system that is flexible enough to satisfy both regimes’ demands without creating duplicative or conflicting workflows.

![Two distinct ovular components, beige and teal, slightly separated, reveal intricate internal gears. This visualizes an Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives engine, emphasizing automated RFQ execution, complex market microstructure, and high-fidelity execution within a Principal's Prime RFQ for optimal price discovery and block trade capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-automated-rfq-execution-microstructure-revealing-principal-prime-os-intelligence-layer-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-capital-efficiency.jpg)

## What Is the Core Philosophical Divide

The primary strategic divergence stems from the core philosophy of each regulation. MiFID II operates from a position of assumed market complexity and potential information asymmetry. Its strategic intent is to arm the client and the regulator with granular data to verify execution quality independently. The regulation mandates a comprehensive consideration of a wide range of “execution factors,” including price, costs, speed, and likelihood of execution.

For RFQs, this means a firm’s strategy cannot be solely price-driven. The selection of counterparties for the quote solicitation must be justifiable and the firm must be able to demonstrate why the RFQ process itself was the most appropriate execution method for that specific order.

FINRA’s strategic intent, articulated in Rule 5310, is to ensure firms use “reasonable diligence” to ascertain the best market for a security and buy or sell in that market so that the resultant price to the customer is as favorable as [possible under prevailing market conditions](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-can-a-firm-quantitatively-demonstrate-that-its-quotes-reflect-prevailing-market-conditions/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). The strategic emphasis is on the firm’s internal processes and controls. The firm must have a sound methodology for reviewing execution quality, but the prescriptive, point-of-trade data requirements are less severe than under MiFID II. The strategy here is to build and maintain a robust, defensible process of “regular and rigorous” review, rather than generating exhaustive data reports for every transaction.

> Under MiFID II, the system must prove the outcome was optimal through data; under FINRA, the system must prove the process for reaching the outcome was sound.

![A sleek, multi-component mechanism features a light upper segment meeting a darker, textured lower part. A diagonal bar pivots on a circular sensor, signifying High-Fidelity Execution and Price Discovery via RFQ Protocols for Digital Asset Derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-for-optimal-price-discovery-and-atomic-settlement-with-prime-os-integration.jpg)

## Comparative Strategic Frameworks

To build a compliant operational strategy, a firm must map its execution protocols against the specific demands of each regulator. The following table outlines the key strategic differences that must be accounted for in the design of a trading system handling RFQs.

| Strategic Consideration | MiFID II Approach | FINRA Approach |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Definition of Best Execution | Mandates “all sufficient steps” to obtain the best possible result across a range of factors (price, cost, speed, likelihood). | Requires “reasonable diligence” to ascertain the most favorable price under prevailing market conditions. |
| Evidentiary Burden | Highly quantitative and prescriptive. Requires detailed post-trade transparency through RTS 27 (venue reports) and RTS 28 (firm reports). | Primarily qualitative and principles-based. Firms must document their “regular and rigorous” review of execution quality. |
| Venue Analysis | Explicitly requires firms to check a variety of execution venues, including regulated markets, MTFs, SIs, and OTC counterparties. | Requires firms to assess the “character of the market,” including price, volatility, and liquidity, to find the “best market.” |
| RFQ Counterparty Selection | The choice of counterparties to include in an RFQ must be justified and documented as part of the “all sufficient steps.” | The selection process must be part of the firm’s overall best execution policy and subject to regular review. |
| Client Disclosure | Requires firms to provide clients with detailed information on their execution policies and annual reports on execution quality (RTS 28). | Requires firms to disclose their payment for order flow arrangements and provide data on execution quality upon request. |

![Translucent circular elements represent distinct institutional liquidity pools and digital asset derivatives. A central arm signifies the Prime RFQ facilitating RFQ-driven price discovery, enabling high-fidelity execution via algorithmic trading, optimizing capital efficiency within complex market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-best-execution-framework.jpg)

## How Does Counterparty Selection Strategy Differ

The strategy for selecting counterparties in an RFQ process is a critical point of divergence. Under MiFID II, the selection itself is part of the best execution obligation. A trading system must be designed to not only send out requests but also to log the rationale behind the choice of the 2, 3, or 5 dealers who are invited to quote. This might involve a tiered system based on historical performance.

- 
**Tier 1 Counterparties** Consistently provide competitive pricing and high response rates for specific asset classes.

- 
**Tier 2 Counterparties** Offer specialized liquidity in less common instruments or under specific [market conditions](https://prime.greeks.live/area/market-conditions/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite).

- 
**Tier 3 Counterparties** New counterparties being evaluated for inclusion in the primary roster.

The system must record data to support this tiering. In contrast, a FINRA-compliant strategy would focus on ensuring the selection process is codified in the firm’s written procedures and is subject to quarterly or semi-annual review. The emphasis is on the soundness of the policy, allowing for more flexibility in the moment of execution, provided the overall process is defensible.

![A central glowing teal mechanism, an RFQ engine core, integrates two distinct pipelines, representing diverse liquidity pools for institutional digital asset derivatives. This visualizes high-fidelity execution within market microstructure, enabling atomic settlement and price discovery for Bitcoin options and Ethereum futures via private quotation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-microstructure-3.jpg)

![Polished metallic disks, resembling data platters, with a precise mechanical arm poised for high-fidelity execution. This embodies an institutional digital asset derivatives platform, optimizing RFQ protocol for efficient price discovery, managing market microstructure, and leveraging a Prime RFQ intelligence layer to minimize execution latency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-precision-execution-via-advanced-rfq-protocols-and-prime-os-intelligence-layer-for-optimal-market-microstructure.jpg)

## Execution

The execution of a compliant RFQ process under MiFID II and FINRA requires a sophisticated and adaptable operational architecture. The abstract principles of each regulation translate into concrete demands on a firm’s technology, data management, and internal workflows. A system designed for one jurisdiction is insufficient for the other; a truly global execution framework must be capable of satisfying both simultaneously.

![A metallic, reflective disc, symbolizing a digital asset derivative or tokenized contract, rests on an intricate Principal's operational framework. This visualizes the market microstructure for high-fidelity execution of institutional digital assets, emphasizing RFQ protocol precision, atomic settlement, and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-system-infrastructure.jpg)

## The Operational Playbook for Dual Compliance

Executing an RFQ is a multi-stage process. To ensure compliance, the operational playbook must embed the distinct requirements of each regulatory regime at every step. This requires a configurable system that can dynamically adjust its data capture and validation logic based on the jurisdiction of the client or transaction.

- 
**Pre-Trade Analysis and Venue Selection** Before initiating an RFQ, the system must perform a preliminary analysis.

<li>
_MiFID II Mandate_ The system must document why the RFQ protocol was chosen over other methods (e.g. algorithmic execution on a lit market). This could be based on order size, instrument liquidity, or complexity. The selection of potential counterparties must be logged, referencing a pre-defined policy.

- 
_[FINRA Mandate](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-best-execution-mandate-in-europe-alter-algorithmic-trading-strategy/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)_ The system should confirm that the use of an RFQ is consistent with the firm’s written best execution policies for that type of security. The focus is on adherence to the established internal process.

</li>
- 
**RFQ Dissemination and Quote Capture** The process of sending the request and receiving quotes is a critical data-gathering event.

<li>
_MiFID II Mandate_ The system must capture precise timestamps for the RFQ dispatch and for each corresponding quote received. All quotes, both winning and losing, must be stored. This data is essential for later analysis of counterparty performance and for [RTS 28](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rts-28/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) reporting.

- 
_FINRA Mandate_ While capturing all quotes is a best practice, the primary requirement is to record the executed trade’s details accurately. The system must be able to reconstruct the trade for a “regular and rigorous” review.

</li>
- 
**Execution and Justification** The moment of execution requires a final layer of validation.

<li>
_MiFID II Mandate_ The execution decision must be logged, linking the chosen quote back to the overarching goal of achieving the “best possible result.” If the best-priced quote is not selected, the system must capture a justification (e.g. the better-priced quote had a lower likelihood of settlement or was for a smaller size than required).

- 
_FINRA Mandate_ The system must demonstrate that the executed price was “as favorable as [possible under prevailing market](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-can-a-firm-quantitatively-demonstrate-that-its-quotes-reflect-prevailing-market-conditions/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) conditions.” This often involves comparing the execution price to a relevant market benchmark at the time of the trade.

</li>
- 
**Post-Trade Reporting and Analysis** The obligations continue long after the trade is complete.

<li>
_MiFID II Mandate_ The captured trade data feeds directly into the firm’s annual RTS 28 report, which publicly discloses the top five execution venues and counterparties used for each class of financial instrument. The data must be granular enough to support this public disclosure.

- 
_FINRA Mandate_ The trade data is used for the firm’s internal “regular and rigorous” review. The output of this review is not typically made public but must be available to FINRA upon request. The system must be able to aggregate and analyze this data to demonstrate the effectiveness of the firm’s policies.

</li>

![Smooth, glossy, multi-colored discs stack irregularly, topped by a dome. This embodies institutional digital asset derivatives market microstructure, with RFQ protocols facilitating aggregated inquiry for multi-leg spread execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-for-prime-os-best-execution.jpg)

## Quantitative Modeling and Data Analysis

A robust [Transaction Cost Analysis](https://prime.greeks.live/area/transaction-cost-analysis/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (TCA) framework is essential for evidencing best execution. The data points required for a meaningful analysis differ significantly between the two regimes, reflecting their different philosophical underpinnings. The following table illustrates a hypothetical TCA report for a series of RFQ trades, highlighting the distinct data requirements.

> Effective TCA is the mechanism by which a firm translates its execution policy from a written document into a verifiable, data-driven reality.

| Trade ID | Instrument | Notional (USD) | Execution Price | Arrival Mid-Price | Price Improvement (bps) | MiFID II Data Point (RTS 28) | FINRA Data Point (Policy Review) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| US-45A1 | XYZ Corp 10Y Bond | 10,000,000 | 99.85 | 99.84 | +1.0 | Top 5 Venue ▴ CP-A | Price checked vs. TRACE |
| EU-B2C9 | ABCDE SE 5Y Bond | 8,000,000 | 101.52 | 101.50 | +2.0 | Top 5 Venue ▴ CP-B | N/A (MiFID II Jurisdiction) |
| US-45A2 | XYZ Corp 10Y Bond | 15,000,000 | 99.88 | 99.89 | -1.0 | Top 5 Venue ▴ CP-C | Negative slippage reviewed; justified by size |
| EU-B2D0 | FGHIJ NV 7Y Bond | 5,000,000 | 103.20 | 103.18 | +2.0 | Top 5 Venue ▴ CP-A | N/A (MiFID II Jurisdiction) |

This data allows a firm to meet its distinct reporting obligations. For the MiFID II trades, the system aggregates the “Top 5 Venue” data to generate the annual RTS 28 report. For the FINRA trades, the “Policy Review” column provides the qualitative justification needed for the internal review process, demonstrating that even trades with negative slippage were scrutinized and found to be reasonable under the circumstances.

![A central concentric ring structure, representing a Prime RFQ hub, processes RFQ protocols. Radiating translucent geometric shapes, symbolizing block trades and multi-leg spreads, illustrate liquidity aggregation for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine-4.jpg)

## What System Integration Is Required for Compliance?

The operational playbook and quantitative analysis must be supported by a deeply integrated technology stack. An Order Management System (OMS) or Execution Management System (EMS) serves as the central hub for this process. The system must have specific modules or configurations to handle the dual requirements:

- 
**Configurable Data Fields** The system must allow for the creation of custom data fields to capture jurisdiction-specific information, such as the justification for choosing a non-best-priced quote under MiFID II.

- 
**Automated Logging** All actions related to an RFQ ▴ from the initial decision to use the protocol to the final execution ▴ must be automatically logged with immutable timestamps. This creates the audit trail required by both regulators.

- 
**Integrated TCA Engine** The TCA module must be able to ingest data directly from the OMS/EMS and produce reports tailored to the specific requirements of MiFID II (RTS 28) and FINRA (internal review).

- 
**Policy Engine** A rules-based engine can help enforce compliance at the point of trade. For example, it could flag an RFQ to a MiFID II client that does not include at least one of the firm’s top-tier counterparties, prompting the trader for a justification.

Ultimately, executing RFQs in a dual-jurisdiction environment is an exercise in precision data management. The technology must serve as the implementation layer for the firm’s strategic response to these complex and divergent regulatory frameworks, ensuring that every trade is not only well-executed but also fully defensible.

![Stacked, glossy modular components depict an institutional-grade Digital Asset Derivatives platform. Layers signify RFQ protocol orchestration, high-fidelity execution, and liquidity aggregation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/layered-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-stack-for-prime-brokerage.jpg)

## References

- Harris, Larry. _Trading and Exchanges Market Microstructure for Practitioners_. Oxford University Press, 2003.

- O’Hara, Maureen. _Market Microstructure Theory_. Blackwell Publishers, 1995.

- European Parliament and Council. “Directive 2014/65/EU on markets in financial instruments (MiFID II).” _Official Journal of the European Union_, 2014.

- Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. “FINRA Rule 5310. Best Execution and Interpositioning.” _FINRA Manual_, 2014.

- European Commission. “Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/565 supplementing Directive 2014/65/EU.” _Official Journal of the European Union_, 2017.

- Lehalle, Charles-Albert, and Sophie Laruelle, editors. _Market Microstructure in Practice_. World Scientific Publishing, 2018.

- U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. “Regulation NMS.” _Federal Register_, vol. 70, no. 124, 2005, pp. 37496-37643.

![The image depicts two distinct liquidity pools or market segments, intersected by algorithmic trading pathways. A central dark sphere represents price discovery and implied volatility within the market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-multi-leg-spread-execution-microstructure.jpg)

## Reflection

![A transparent sphere, representing a digital asset option, rests on an aqua geometric RFQ execution venue. This proprietary liquidity pool integrates with an opaque institutional grade infrastructure, depicting high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement within a Principal's operational framework for Crypto Derivatives OS](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system-prime-os.jpg)

## From Compliance Burden to Strategic Asset

The examination of MiFID II and FINRA’s best execution rules reveals a foundational truth about modern financial markets ▴ a firm’s operational architecture is inseparable from its strategic capabilities. It is possible to view these divergent regulatory frameworks as a series of compliance hurdles, each requiring a separate checklist and data silo. This approach, while perhaps sufficient to avoid sanction, misses the larger opportunity. The real task is to synthesize these requirements into a single, coherent execution system ▴ an intelligence layer that transforms regulatory data into a competitive advantage.

Consider the data streams mandated by these rules. They are not merely archival records for auditors. They are a high-fidelity map of your firm’s interaction with the market. They detail which counterparties respond quickly, which offer the tightest spreads in volatile conditions, and which provide genuine liquidity when it is most needed.

A system designed only for compliance stores this information. A system designed for strategic advantage analyzes it, learns from it, and uses it to refine its execution logic for the next trade. The question then becomes, is your firm’s technology a reactive record-keeper or a proactive execution engine? Does your operational framework simply satisfy the letter of the law, or does it embody a deeper commitment to achieving a superior outcome for your clients and your own portfolio?

![A precision-engineered metallic cross-structure, embodying an RFQ engine's market microstructure, showcases diverse elements. One granular arm signifies aggregated liquidity pools and latent liquidity](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-rfq-engine-microstructure-for-atomic-settlement.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/financial-industry-regulatory-authority/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek Execution Management System diagonally spans segmented Market Microstructure, representing Prime RFQ for Institutional Grade Digital Asset Derivatives. It rests on two distinct Liquidity Pools, one facilitating RFQ Block Trade Price Discovery, the other a Dark Pool for Private Quotation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-optimizing-rfq-protocols-across-segmented-liquidity-pools.jpg)

## Financial Industry Regulatory Authority

Meaning ▴ The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, commonly known as FINRA, operates as the largest independent regulator for all securities firms conducting business with the public in the United States. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/request-for-quote/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A central toroidal structure and intricate core are bisected by two blades: one algorithmic with circuits, the other solid. This symbolizes an institutional digital asset derivatives platform, leveraging RFQ protocols for high-fidelity execution and price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-hub-integrating-algorithmic-intelligence-for-high-fidelity-price-discovery-and-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## Request for Quote

Meaning ▴ A Request for Quote, or RFQ, constitutes a formal communication initiated by a potential buyer or seller to solicit price quotations for a specified financial instrument or block of instruments from one or more liquidity providers. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/best-execution/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, metallic instrument with a translucent, teal-banded probe, symbolizing RFQ generation and high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives. This represents price discovery within dark liquidity pools and atomic settlement via a Prime RFQ, optimizing capital efficiency for institutional grade trading](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution-3.jpg)

## Best Execution

Meaning ▴ Best Execution is the obligation to obtain the most favorable terms reasonably available for a client's order. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/all-sufficient-steps/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Two distinct components, beige and green, are securely joined by a polished blue metallic element. This embodies a high-fidelity RFQ protocol for institutional digital asset derivatives, ensuring atomic settlement and optimal liquidity](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-rfq-protocol-for-digital-asset-derivatives-high-fidelity-link.jpg)

## All Sufficient Steps

Meaning ▴ All Sufficient Steps denotes a design principle and operational mandate within a system where every component or process is engineered to autonomously achieve its defined objective without requiring external intervention or additional inputs beyond its initial parameters. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/mifid-ii/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A conceptual image illustrates a sophisticated RFQ protocol engine, depicting the market microstructure of institutional digital asset derivatives. Two semi-spheres, one light grey and one teal, represent distinct liquidity pools or counterparties within a Prime RFQ, connected by a complex execution management system for high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement of Bitcoin options or Ethereum futures](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-market-microstructure-2.jpg)

## Mifid Ii

Meaning ▴ MiFID II, the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II, constitutes a comprehensive regulatory framework enacted by the European Union to govern financial markets, investment firms, and trading venues. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfq-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Two distinct, polished spherical halves, beige and teal, reveal intricate internal market microstructure, connected by a central metallic shaft. This embodies an institutional-grade RFQ protocol for digital asset derivatives, enabling high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement across disparate liquidity pools for principal block trades](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution-prime-os.jpg)

## Rfq Process

Meaning ▴ The RFQ Process, or Request for Quote Process, is a formalized electronic protocol utilized by institutional participants to solicit executable price quotations for a specific financial instrument and quantity from a select group of liquidity providers. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-can-a-firm-quantitatively-demonstrate-that-its-quotes-reflect-prevailing-market-conditions/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, multi-segmented sphere embodies a Principal's operational framework for institutional digital asset derivatives. Its transparent 'intelligence layer' signifies high-fidelity execution and price discovery via RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocol-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-engine.jpg)

## Under Prevailing Market Conditions

A firm proves its quotes reflect market conditions by systematically benchmarking them against a synthesized, multi-factor market price. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/counterparty-selection/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Intersecting sleek conduits, one with precise water droplets, a reflective sphere, and a dark blade. This symbolizes institutional RFQ protocol for high-fidelity execution, navigating market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-framework-optimizing-latent-liquidity-discovery-and-atomic-settlement-protocols.jpg)

## Counterparty Selection

Meaning ▴ Counterparty selection refers to the systematic process of identifying, evaluating, and engaging specific entities for trade execution, risk transfer, or service provision, based on predefined criteria such as creditworthiness, liquidity provision, operational reliability, and pricing competitiveness within a digital asset derivatives ecosystem. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/execution-quality/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Sleek, engineered components depict an institutional-grade Execution Management System. The prominent dark structure represents high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-for-optimized-price-discovery-high-fidelity-execution-and-market-microstructure.jpg)

## Execution Quality

Meaning ▴ Execution Quality quantifies the efficacy of an order's fill, assessing how closely the achieved trade price aligns with the prevailing market price at submission, alongside consideration for speed, cost, and market impact. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-specific-data-reporting-requirements-for-execution-venues-under-mifid-ii-rts-27/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Two robust modules, a Principal's operational framework for digital asset derivatives, connect via a central RFQ protocol mechanism. This system enables high-fidelity execution, price discovery, atomic settlement for block trades, ensuring capital efficiency in market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-execution-engine.jpg)

## Under Mifid

RTS 27 mandates that execution venues publish granular, quarterly reports on price, cost, speed, and likelihood of execution. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-can-a-firm-quantitatively-demonstrate-that-its-quotes-reflect-prevailing-market-conditions/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Robust metallic structures, one blue-tinted, one teal, intersect, covered in granular water droplets. This depicts a principal's institutional RFQ framework facilitating multi-leg spread execution, aggregating deep liquidity pools for optimal price discovery and high-fidelity atomic settlement of digital asset derivatives for enhanced capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-optimized-for-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Possible under Prevailing Market Conditions

A firm proves its quotes reflect market conditions by systematically benchmarking them against a synthesized, multi-factor market price. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/market-conditions/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Intersecting metallic structures symbolize RFQ protocol pathways for institutional digital asset derivatives. They represent high-fidelity execution of multi-leg spreads across diverse liquidity pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-framework-optimizing-multi-leg-spreads-and-liquidity-aggregation-for-best-execution.jpg)

## Market Conditions

Meaning ▴ Market Conditions denote the aggregate state of variables influencing trading dynamics within a given asset class, encompassing quantifiable metrics such as prevailing liquidity levels, volatility profiles, order book depth, bid-ask spreads, and the directional pressure of order flow. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-best-execution-mandate-in-europe-alter-algorithmic-trading-strategy/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Crossing reflective elements on a dark surface symbolize high-fidelity execution and multi-leg spread strategies. A central sphere represents the intelligence layer for price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-algorithmic-trading-across-intersecting-liquidity-pools-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols.jpg)

## Finra Mandate

The European best execution mandate systemically re-architects algorithms to optimize for a multi-factor result, not just price. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rts-28/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Angularly connected segments portray distinct liquidity pools and RFQ protocols. A speckled grey section highlights granular market microstructure and aggregated inquiry complexities for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-efficiency.jpg)

## Rts 28

Meaning ▴ RTS 28 refers to Regulatory Technical Standard 28 under MiFID II, which mandates investment firms and market operators to publish annual reports on the quality of execution of transactions on trading venues and for financial instruments. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-can-a-firm-quantitatively-demonstrate-that-its-quotes-reflect-prevailing-market-conditions/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Two distinct modules, symbolizing institutional trading entities, are robustly interconnected by blue data conduits and intricate internal circuitry. This visualizes a Crypto Derivatives OS facilitating private quotation via RFQ protocol, enabling high-fidelity execution of block trades for atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-engine-interconnect-for-optimal-rfq-execution.jpg)

## Possible under Prevailing Market

A firm proves its quotes reflect market conditions by systematically benchmarking them against a synthesized, multi-factor market price. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/transaction-cost-analysis/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A central, metallic cross-shaped RFQ protocol engine orchestrates principal liquidity aggregation between two distinct institutional liquidity pools. Its intricate design suggests high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement within digital asset options trading, forming a core Crypto Derivatives OS for algorithmic price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-architecture-optimizing-liquidity-aggregation-and-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Transaction Cost Analysis

Meaning ▴ Transaction Cost Analysis (TCA) is the quantitative methodology for assessing the explicit and implicit costs incurred during the execution of financial trades. </a>

**Tags:** [All Sufficient Steps](https://options.greeks.live/area/all-sufficient-steps/), [Execution Quality](https://options.greeks.live/area/execution-quality/), [Prevailing Market Conditions](https://options.greeks.live/area/prevailing-market-conditions/), [RFQ Process](https://options.greeks.live/area/rfq-process/), [Counterparty Selection](https://options.greeks.live/area/counterparty-selection/), [Market Conditions](https://options.greeks.live/area/market-conditions/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [What Are the Primary Regulatory Frameworks That Mandate the Functions of a Best Execution Committee?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-regulatory-frameworks-that-mandate-the-functions-of-a-best-execution-committee/)
![A futuristic metallic optical system, featuring a sharp, blade-like component, symbolizes an institutional-grade platform. It enables high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives, optimizing market microstructure via precise RFQ protocols, ensuring efficient price discovery and robust portfolio margin.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-for-high-fidelity-rfq-execution-and-optimal-price-discovery.jpg)

The primary regulatory frameworks, including FINRA Rule 5310 and MiFID II, mandate a systematic, evidence-based process for ensuring optimal client outcomes.

- 
### [What Are the Best Execution Implications under MiFID II When Using an RFQ System?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-best-execution-implications-under-mifid-ii-when-using-an-rfq-system/)
![A metallic precision tool rests on a circuit board, its glowing traces depicting market microstructure and algorithmic trading. A reflective disc, symbolizing a liquidity pool, mirrors the tool, highlighting high-fidelity execution and price discovery for institutional digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols and Principal's Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-driving-high-fidelity-execution-and-market-microstructure-optimization-via-principal-prime-os.jpg)

MiFID II transforms an RFQ system from a communication tool into a data-centric, auditable framework for proving best execution.

- 
### [What Are the Key Differences in Best Execution Rules between the US and the EU?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-in-best-execution-rules-between-the-us-and-the-eu/)
![Stacked, multi-colored discs symbolize an institutional RFQ Protocol's layered architecture for Digital Asset Derivatives. This embodies a Prime RFQ enabling high-fidelity execution across diverse liquidity pools, optimizing multi-leg spread trading and capital efficiency within complex market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-stack-for-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

US and EU best execution rules differ in the EU's prescriptive, multi-factor approach versus the US's price-centric, principles-based framework.

- 
### [How Do Regulatory Frameworks like MiFID II Influence the Measurement and Reporting of Information Leakage?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-regulatory-frameworks-like-mifid-ii-influence-the-measurement-and-reporting-of-information-leakage/)
![A multi-faceted geometric object with varied reflective surfaces rests on a dark, curved base. It embodies complex RFQ protocols and deep liquidity pool dynamics, representing advanced market microstructure for precise price discovery and high-fidelity execution of institutional digital asset derivatives, optimizing capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/multi-faceted-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-infrastructure.jpg)

MiFID II mandates a systemic architecture of control, transforming information leakage from an accepted friction into a quantifiable compliance metric.

- 
### [How Do Regulatory Bodies like the Sec and Fca Define Best Execution?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-regulatory-bodies-like-the-sec-and-fca-define-best-execution/)
![A multi-layered, sectioned sphere reveals core institutional digital asset derivatives architecture. Translucent layers depict dynamic RFQ liquidity pools and multi-leg spread execution. The opaque half signifies robust institutional-grade infrastructure. A central core embodies the Prime RFQ intelligence layer, enabling high-fidelity execution, atomic settlement, and optimal price discovery.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-market-microstructure-1.jpg)

The SEC and FCA define best execution as a dynamic, evidence-based duty to secure the most favorable client outcomes through rigorous process and analysis.

- 
### [What Are the Core Differences between MiFID II and FINRA Best Execution Rules for RFQs?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-core-differences-between-mifid-ii-and-finra-best-execution-rules-for-rfqs/)
![Internal components of a Prime RFQ execution engine, with modular beige units, precise metallic mechanisms, and complex data wiring. This infrastructure supports high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives, facilitating advanced RFQ protocols, optimal liquidity aggregation, multi-leg spread trading, and efficient price discovery.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-core-rfq-engine-for-institutional-digital-asset-options.jpg)

MiFID II demands data-driven proof of "all sufficient steps," while FINRA requires procedural "reasonable diligence."

- 
### [How Do MiFID II and FINRA Rules for Best Execution Differ in RFQ Scenarios?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-mifid-ii-and-finra-rules-for-best-execution-differ-in-rfq-scenarios/)
![A sleek cream-colored device with a dark blue optical sensor embodies Price Discovery for Digital Asset Derivatives. It signifies High-Fidelity Execution via RFQ Protocols, driven by an Intelligence Layer optimizing Market Microstructure for Algorithmic Trading on a Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-high-fidelity-execution-engine-optimized-rfq-protocols-prime-os-intelligence-layer.jpg)

MiFID II demands continuous, evidence-based proof of optimal process per RFQ; FINRA requires periodic validation of a firm's diligent overall system.

- 
### [What Are the Key Differences in Best Execution Requirements between the EU and the US?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-in-best-execution-requirements-between-the-eu-and-the-us/)
![A precision-engineered metallic and glass system depicts the core of an Institutional Grade Prime RFQ, facilitating high-fidelity execution for Digital Asset Derivatives. Transparent layers represent visible liquidity pools and the intricate market microstructure supporting RFQ protocol processing, ensuring atomic settlement capabilities.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/robust-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-platform-for-optimized-rfq-protocol-execution-and-deep-liquidity-access.jpg)

EU's MiFID II mandates prescriptive, data-driven proof of best execution, while the US system requires a principles-based, diligent review.

- 
### [How Can a Firm Use TCA Data to Comply with Best Execution Regulations like MiFID II?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-a-firm-use-tca-data-to-comply-with-best-execution-regulations-like-mifid-ii/)
![A precise stack of multi-layered circular components visually representing a sophisticated Principal Digital Asset RFQ framework. Each distinct layer signifies a critical component within market microstructure for high-fidelity execution of institutional digital asset derivatives, embodying liquidity aggregation across dark pools, enabling private quotation and atomic settlement.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-digital-asset-rfq-protocol-layers-for-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

TCA provides the empirical data architecture required to prove and improve execution quality in compliance with MiFID II's best execution mandate.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "How Do MiFID II and FINRA Rules Differ on Best Execution for RFQs?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-mifid-ii-and-finra-rules-differ-on-best-execution-for-rfqs/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-mifid-ii-and-finra-rules-differ-on-best-execution-for-rfqs/"
    },
    "headline": "How Do MiFID II and FINRA Rules Differ on Best Execution for RFQs? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "MiFID II and FINRA mandate distinct best execution architectures for RFQs, one data-driven and the other process-oriented. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-mifid-ii-and-finra-rules-differ-on-best-execution-for-rfqs/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-05T18:07:56+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-08-05T18:07:57+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-engine-interconnect-for-optimal-rfq-execution.jpg",
        "caption": "Two distinct, streamlined modules, one dark grey and one light teal, are connected by robust blue conduits and intricate metallic components. This abstract representation embodies an institutional-grade Crypto Derivatives OS, illustrating the secure interconnect protocol for private quotation and RFQ execution. It highlights high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives, including Bitcoin options and Ethereum futures, emphasizing atomic settlement and capital efficiency."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "All Sufficient Steps",
        "Best Execution",
        "Counterparty Selection",
        "EMS Integration",
        "Execution Quality",
        "Execution Venue Analysis",
        "Financial Industry Regulatory Authority",
        "FINRA Rule 5310",
        "Market Conditions",
        "Market Microstructure",
        "MiFID II",
        "OMS Architecture",
        "Prevailing Market Conditions",
        "Regular and Rigorous Review",
        "Regulatory Reporting",
        "Request for Quote",
        "RFQ Compliance",
        "RFQ Process",
        "RTS 27",
        "RTS 28",
        "Transaction Cost Analysis"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "FAQPage",
    "mainEntity": [
        {
            "@type": "Question",
            "name": "What System Integration Is Required For Compliance?",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "@type": "Answer",
                "text": "The operational playbook and quantitative analysis must be supported by a deeply integrated technology stack. An Order Management System (OMS) or Execution Management System (EMS) serves as the central hub for this process. The system must have specific modules or configurations to handle the dual requirements:"
            }
        }
    ]
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-mifid-ii-and-finra-rules-differ-on-best-execution-for-rfqs/
