# How Do You Determine the Appropriate Weights for Different Rfp Criteria? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-07
**Categories:** Question

---

![Sleek, angled structures intersect, reflecting a central convergence. Intersecting light planes illustrate RFQ Protocol pathways for Price Discovery and High-Fidelity Execution in Market Microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-price-discovery-microstructure.jpg)

![A sleek central sphere with intricate teal mechanisms represents the Prime RFQ for institutional digital asset derivatives. Intersecting panels signify aggregated liquidity pools and multi-leg spread strategies, optimizing market microstructure for RFQ execution, ensuring high-fidelity atomic settlement and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-core-engine.jpg)

## Concept

Determining the appropriate weights for Request for Proposal (RFP) criteria is an exercise in systemic self-awareness. It compels an organization to translate its abstract strategic objectives into a concrete, quantitative [decision-making framework](https://prime.greeks.live/area/decision-making-framework/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). The process is a deliberate calibration, defining the very architecture of a future partnership or system acquisition. It moves the selection process from a subjective comparison of features to a disciplined, evidence-based evaluation of value.

The core task is to construct a model that reflects not what a vendor sells, but what the organization truly needs to acquire to advance its mission. This requires a foundational understanding that not all criteria are created equal; their relative importance is a direct function of the strategic context surrounding the procurement.

The initial step involves deconstructing the requirement into logical, comprehensive categories. These typically represent the primary pillars of value and risk in any significant acquisition. While the specifics will vary, they can be distilled into several core domains.

Each domain acts as a lens through which to evaluate a proposal, ensuring a holistic assessment that balances competing priorities. This structured decomposition prevents the overweighting of conspicuous features while overlooking more fundamental, yet less visible, attributes like operational resilience or long-term viability.

![A precisely engineered central blue hub anchors segmented grey and blue components, symbolizing a robust Prime RFQ for institutional trading of digital asset derivatives. This structure represents a sophisticated RFQ protocol engine, optimizing liquidity pool aggregation and price discovery through advanced market microstructure for high-fidelity execution and private quotation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/prime-os-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-core-systemic-hub.jpg)

## The Primary Evaluative Domains

A robust evaluation framework is built upon a clear categorization of criteria. This provides a structured approach to ensure all facets of a vendor’s offering and capabilities are considered in proportion to their strategic importance.

- **Technical and Functional Alignment** ▴ This domain assesses the degree to which the proposed solution meets the specified operational and performance requirements. It examines features, system architecture, integration capabilities, and scalability. The focus is on the solution’s direct ability to perform the required tasks.

- **Financial Architecture** ▴ This category extends beyond the headline price to encompass the [total cost of ownership](https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost-of-ownership/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (TCO). It includes implementation fees, licensing models, support costs, and potential exit costs. A sophisticated analysis also considers the vendor’s financial stability, viewing it as a proxy for long-term reliability and investment in their own product roadmap.

- **Operational and Support Framework** ▴ This domain evaluates the vendor’s ability to implement, support, and maintain the solution effectively. Criteria include the proposed [implementation timeline](https://prime.greeks.live/area/implementation-timeline/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), the quality and availability of customer support, service level agreements (SLAs), and the robustness of their data security protocols. 

- **Strategic and Relational Congruence** ▴ This often-underestimated category assesses the alignment between the vendor and the procuring organization at a strategic level. It considers the vendor’s market reputation, their product roadmap’s alignment with the organization’s future needs, cultural fit, and the quality of client references. It gauges the potential for a long-term, collaborative partnership rather than a purely transactional relationship.

Assigning weights is the mechanism that forces a deliberate conversation about priorities. It is an explicit declaration of what matters most. An organization primarily focused on rapid market entry might heavily weight criteria in the Technical and Operational domains, prioritizing speed and functionality.

In contrast, a public sector entity handling sensitive data would likely place a much greater emphasis on the Operational and Support Framework, specifically data security and vendor stability, reflecting its mandate to prioritize [risk mitigation](https://prime.greeks.live/area/risk-mitigation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) over cutting-edge features. The weighting process, therefore, is not a mere mathematical exercise; it is the quantitative expression of an organization’s strategic intent.

![A sleek, abstract system interface with a central spherical lens representing real-time Price Discovery and Implied Volatility analysis for institutional Digital Asset Derivatives. Its precise contours signify High-Fidelity Execution and robust RFQ protocol orchestration, managing latent liquidity and minimizing slippage for optimized Alpha Generation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-via-optimized-rfq-protocols-enhancing-market-microstructure.jpg)

![Sleek, layered surfaces represent an institutional grade Crypto Derivatives OS enabling high-fidelity execution. Circular elements symbolize price discovery via RFQ private quotation protocols, facilitating atomic settlement for multi-leg spread strategies in digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-trading-system-core.jpg)

## Strategy

Once the evaluative domains are established, the strategic task of assigning weights begins. This process transforms the RFP from a simple request for information into a sophisticated tool for [strategic procurement](https://prime.greeks.live/area/strategic-procurement/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). The methodology chosen to assign these weights can range from simple, direct allocation to more complex, analytically rigorous models.

The selection of a methodology should itself be a strategic choice, reflecting the complexity, risk, and value of the procurement at hand. A low-risk, simple purchase may warrant a straightforward approach, while a high-value, complex system acquisition demands a more defensible and objective framework.

> The strategic assignment of weights is the conversion of organizational priorities into a quantifiable and defensible decision-making architecture.

The most common method is the weighted-attribute model, where criteria are assigned a percentage, with the total summing to 100%. This approach is intuitive and transparent, making it highly effective for most procurement scenarios. It requires stakeholders to engage in a direct negotiation of priorities, forcing a clear consensus on the relative importance of each criterion. The outcome is a clear, numerical representation of the organization’s strategic priorities, which can be applied consistently across all proposals to generate a ranked list of vendors. 

![A stylized spherical system, symbolizing an institutional digital asset derivative, rests on a robust Prime RFQ base. Its dark core represents a deep liquidity pool for algorithmic trading](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-grade-rfq-protocol-engine-facilitating-best-execution-and-liquidity-aggregation-for-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

## Methodologies for Weight Allocation

Different strategic situations call for different weighting models. The choice of model determines the granularity and objectivity of the evaluation, directly impacting the quality of the final decision.

- **Direct Weighting (Simple Score)** ▴ In this model, stakeholders collectively decide on a percentage weight for each major criterion or category. For instance, ‘[Technical Capability](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-should-an-organization-weight-cost-versus-technical-capability-in-an-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)’ might be assigned 40%, ‘Cost’ 30%, and ‘[Vendor Experience](https://prime.greeks.live/news/crypto-funds-experience-significant-outflow-halting-prolonged-inflow-streak/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)’ 30%. This method is transparent and easy to communicate. Its effectiveness hinges on the ability of the evaluation team to reach a rational consensus on the weights through discussion and debate.

- **Hierarchical Weighting** ▴ For more complex RFPs, a hierarchical structure is more effective. Major categories receive a high-level weight (e.g. ‘Technical’ at 50%), and then the criteria within that category are assigned weights that sum to 100% of the category’s total. For example, within the ‘Technical’ category, ‘Integration Capabilities’ might be 40% and ‘Scalability’ 60%. This allows for a more granular and nuanced evaluation, preventing a single sub-criterion from having an outsized impact on the total score.

- **[Analytical Hierarchy Process](https://prime.greeks.live/area/analytical-hierarchy-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (AHP)** ▴ AHP is a more structured and mathematically grounded technique for complex decisions. Instead of assigning direct weights, evaluators conduct a series of [pairwise comparisons between criteria](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-in-evaluation-criteria-between-an-rfp-and-an-rfq-phase/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). They are asked, for example, “How much more important is Cost than Implementation Timeline?” using a standardized scale (e.g. 1 for equally important, 9 for extremely more important). These judgments are then synthesized mathematically to derive the criteria weights. This process reduces cognitive bias by breaking a complex decision into a series of simpler judgments.

The strategic dialogue required to implement any of these models is where the true value lies. It forces the organization to confront trade-offs explicitly. Is a 10% reduction in cost worth sacrificing key security features? Is a faster implementation timeline more valuable than a more scalable long-term platform?

The weighting process makes these trade-offs quantitative. For example, a vendor scoring perfectly on a ‘Cost’ criterion weighted at 20% but poorly on a ‘Security’ criterion weighted at 40% will be systematically and justifiably ranked lower than a more expensive but more secure competitor. This data-driven approach provides a robust defense for the final decision, grounding it in the declared priorities of the organization.

![Modular circuit panels, two with teal traces, converge around a central metallic anchor. This symbolizes core architecture for institutional digital asset derivatives, representing a Principal's Prime RFQ framework, enabling high-fidelity execution and RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-prime-os.jpg)

## Comparative Analysis of Weighting Models

The selection of a weighting model has direct implications for the objectivity, complexity, and resource requirements of the [RFP evaluation](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) process.

| Methodology | Description | Strategic Application | Limitations |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Direct Weighting | Criteria are assigned percentage points based on stakeholder consensus. The total must sum to 100%. | Best for low-to-medium complexity procurements where priorities are clear and the evaluation team is small and aligned. | Can be susceptible to cognitive biases or disproportionate influence from certain stakeholders during the consensus-building process. |
| Hierarchical Weighting | Weights are assigned to major categories, and then sub-criteria are weighted within each category. | Ideal for complex RFPs with numerous criteria, as it provides structure and ensures granular factors are considered in the proper context. | Requires more time to set up and can become complex to manage if the hierarchy has too many levels or branches. |
| Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) | Derives weights from a series of pairwise comparisons between criteria, using a formal mathematical model to ensure consistency. | Most suitable for high-risk, high-value, and highly complex decisions where objectivity and defensibility are paramount. Reduces individual bias. | Requires specialized knowledge or software to implement correctly and is significantly more time-consuming for the evaluation team. |

![A glossy, segmented sphere with a luminous blue 'X' core represents a Principal's Prime RFQ. It highlights multi-dealer RFQ protocols, high-fidelity execution, and atomic settlement for institutional digital asset derivatives, signifying unified liquidity pools, market microstructure, and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/prime-os-core-for-best-rfq-digital-asset-derivatives-institutional-trade-flow.jpg)

![A sophisticated institutional-grade device featuring a luminous blue core, symbolizing advanced price discovery mechanisms and high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives. This intelligence layer supports private quotation via RFQ protocols, enabling aggregated inquiry and atomic settlement within a Prime RFQ framework](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-core-intelligence.jpg)

## Execution

Executing a [weighted scoring](https://prime.greeks.live/area/weighted-scoring/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) model requires operational discipline and a structured process. It is the phase where strategic priorities, codified as weights, are applied to vendor proposals to produce an objective, data-driven ranking. This process must be managed with transparency and consistency to ensure its integrity and the defensibility of the final selection. The execution begins with the formation of an [evaluation team](https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-team/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) and culminates in a final, documented recommendation.

![Abstract metallic components, resembling an advanced Prime RFQ mechanism, precisely frame a teal sphere, symbolizing a liquidity pool. This depicts the market microstructure supporting RFQ protocols for high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives, ensuring capital efficiency in algorithmic trading](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-architecture-driving-rfq-protocol-execution-and-capital-efficiency-optimization.jpg)

## The Operational Playbook for Weighted Evaluation

A successful execution follows a clear, multi-step procedure that ensures all proposals are evaluated fairly and consistently against the established, weighted criteria. This operational discipline is critical to translating strategic intent into a successful procurement outcome.

- **Establish the Evaluation Committee** ▴ Assemble a cross-functional team of stakeholders with expertise relevant to the [evaluation criteria](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-determine-the-appropriate-weighting-for-evaluation-criteria-in-an-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). This should include representatives from technical, financial, operational, and business units. Providing training on the scoring methodology is essential to prevent groupthink and ensure consistent application of the rules.

- **Develop the Scoring Rubric** ▴ For each criterion, define what constitutes an excellent, good, fair, or poor response. For example, a 5-point scale might be defined where a score of 5 means ‘Exceeds all requirements’ and a score of 1 means ‘Does not meet requirements’. This rubric is the key to converting qualitative proposal content into quantitative scores.

- **Conduct Independent Evaluations** ▴ Each member of the evaluation committee should first score all proposals independently. This initial, private scoring process ensures that each evaluator’s unique perspective is captured without being unduly influenced by others in the group. 

- **Facilitate a Consensus Meeting** ▴ The committee convenes to discuss the scores. The focus should be on areas with significant variance in scoring. An evaluator who scored a vendor low on ‘Implementation Timeline’ should be ableto articulate their reasoning, citing specific weaknesses in the proposal. The goal is not to force all scores to be identical, but to ensure that all scores are defensible and based on the evidence presented in the proposals.

- **Calculate the Weighted Scores** ▴ Once final “raw” scores for each criterion are agreed upon, the predetermined weights are applied. The raw score for each criterion is multiplied by its weight to produce the [weighted score](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-counterparty-performance-score-differ-from-a-traditional-credit-score/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). These are then summed to arrive at a total score for each vendor.

- **Document the Final Decision** ▴ The entire process, including the scoring rubric, individual and consensus scores, and the final weighted calculations, must be thoroughly documented. This creates a clear audit trail that justifies the selection and protects the organization from potential challenges. 

![A central glowing core within metallic structures symbolizes an Institutional Grade RFQ engine. This Intelligence Layer enables optimal Price Discovery and High-Fidelity Execution for Digital Asset Derivatives, streamlining Block Trade and Multi-Leg Spread Atomic Settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-microstructure-core.jpg)

## Quantitative Modeling a Practical Example

Consider a company selecting a new Customer Relationship Management (CRM) platform. The evaluation committee has established five key criteria and, after a strategic discussion, assigned weights via a direct weighting model. They use a 1-to-5 scoring rubric.

> The application of a quantitative model removes ambiguity, forcing a decision based on the organization’s declared priorities rather than subjective preference.

![A macro view of a precision-engineered metallic component, representing the robust core of an Institutional Grade Prime RFQ. Its intricate Market Microstructure design facilitates Digital Asset Derivatives RFQ Protocols, enabling High-Fidelity Execution and Algorithmic Trading for Block Trades, ensuring Capital Efficiency and Best Execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-core-system-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-and-advanced-market-microstructure-optimization.jpg)

## RFP Criteria and Weighting

The table below shows the weights assigned to each evaluation category, reflecting the company’s strategic priority of technical capability and user experience over absolute lowest cost.

| Evaluation Criterion | Weight | Rationale |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Technical Capability | 40% | The system’s features and integration with existing tools are paramount for operational efficiency. |
| Total Cost of Ownership | 20% | Cost is a significant factor, but not the primary driver. Value for money is the goal. |
| Vendor Experience & Stability | 20% | A proven track record and financial stability are crucial for a long-term partnership. |
| Implementation Plan & Timeline | 10% | A clear, efficient deployment plan is important to minimize business disruption. |
| Support Quality & SLAs | 10% | Responsive support and guaranteed uptime are necessary for this business-critical system. |

![A sophisticated modular apparatus, likely a Prime RFQ component, showcases high-fidelity execution capabilities. Its interconnected sections, featuring a central glowing intelligence layer, suggest a robust RFQ protocol engine](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-rfq-engine-core-for-digital-asset-derivatives-high-fidelity-execution-protocols.jpg)

## Vendor Scoring and Final Ranking

After evaluating three vendors (TechCorp, SalesMax, and CloudCRM), the committee agrees on the following raw scores. The weighted scores are then calculated to determine the final ranking.

The calculation for each cell in the “Weighted Score” columns is ▴ (Raw Score Criterion Weight). The “Total Weighted Score” is the sum of the weighted scores for that vendor.

| Evaluation Criterion (Weight) | TechCorp Raw Score (1-5) | TechCorp Weighted Score | SalesMax Raw Score (1-5) | SalesMax Weighted Score | CloudCRM Raw Score (1-5) | CloudCRM Weighted Score |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Technical Capability (40%) | 5 | 2.00 | 4 | 1.60 | 4 | 1.60 |
| Total Cost of Ownership (20%) | 3 | 0.60 | 5 | 1.00 | 4 | 0.80 |
| Vendor Experience (20%) | 4 | 0.80 | 3 | 0.60 | 5 | 1.00 |
| Implementation (10%) | 4 | 0.40 | 4 | 0.40 | 3 | 0.30 |
| Support Quality (10%) | 5 | 0.50 | 3 | 0.30 | 4 | 0.40 |
| Total Score | N/A | 4.30 | N/A | 3.90 | N/A | 4.10 |

In this scenario, TechCorp emerges as the winner with a score of 4.30. While SalesMax offered the lowest price (a perfect raw score of 5 on cost), its lower scores in the more heavily weighted categories of Technical Capability, Vendor Experience, and Support Quality resulted in a lower overall rank. The model provided a structured and defensible rationale for selecting a vendor that was not the cheapest, but that represented the best overall value according to the organization’s stated priorities. 

![A glowing green ring encircles a dark, reflective sphere, symbolizing a principal's intelligence layer for high-fidelity RFQ execution. It reflects intricate market microstructure, signifying precise algorithmic trading for institutional digital asset derivatives, optimizing price discovery and managing latent liquidity](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/core-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system-hub.jpg)

## References

- Saaty, Thomas L. _The Analytic Hierarchy Process ▴ Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation_. McGraw-Hill, 1980.

- Bascetin, A. “A decision making methodology for the selection of a new mining method in the Cankur mines of the Cayeli Bakir Isletmeleri A.S.” _The Journal of The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy_, vol. 111, 2011, pp. 779-786.

- Vaidya, O. S. and S. Kumar. “Analytic hierarchy process ▴ An overview of applications.” _European Journal of Operational Research_, vol. 169, no. 1, 2006, pp. 1-29.

- New Zealand Government Procurement. “Decide on your evaluation methodology.” Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment, 2023.

- Euna Solutions. “RFP Evaluation Criteria ▴ Everything You Need to Know.” 2024.

- Procurement Tactics. “12 RFP Evaluation Criteria to Consider in 2025.” 2024.

- Responsive. “A Guide to RFP Evaluation Criteria ▴ Basics, Tips, and Examples.” 2021.

- Prokuria. “How to do RFP scoring ▴ Step-by-step Guide.” 2025.

![Internal components of a Prime RFQ execution engine, with modular beige units, precise metallic mechanisms, and complex data wiring. This infrastructure supports high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives, facilitating advanced RFQ protocols, optimal liquidity aggregation, multi-leg spread trading, and efficient price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-core-rfq-engine-for-institutional-digital-asset-options.jpg)

## Reflection

![A golden rod, symbolizing RFQ initiation, converges with a teal crystalline matching engine atop a liquidity pool sphere. This illustrates high-fidelity execution within market microstructure, facilitating price discovery for multi-leg spread strategies on a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-systemic-core.jpg)

## From Process to Protocol

Mastering the allocation of weights within an RFP evaluation is more than an act of procurement; it is an act of organizational introspection. The framework that emerges from this process is a mirror, reflecting the institution’s true priorities, its tolerance for risk, and its strategic vision. The final set of weights is not merely a scoring key but a protocol ▴ a defined procedure for making a high-stakes decision under conditions of uncertainty. It codifies the institution’s operational philosophy into an executable format.

Viewing the weighting process through this lens elevates its purpose. It becomes a mechanism for ensuring strategic alignment across disparate internal teams, forcing a unified definition of “value.” The debates that occur during the weighting workshop ▴ the arguments for prioritizing cybersecurity over user interface, or long-term scalability over immediate cost savings ▴ are where an organization’s abstract goals are forged into concrete, actionable policy. The resulting decision is therefore not the product of a single opinion, but of a system designed to produce an optimal outcome based on a collectively defined logic.

Ultimately, the discipline required to design and execute this protocol becomes a strategic asset in itself. It builds a capacity for making rational, defensible, and intelligent decisions. The question then evolves from “Which vendor should we choose?” to “Have we designed a system for choosing that correctly models our own definition of success?” The answer to that question reveals the true maturity of an organization’s operational framework.

![A sleek, metallic mechanism with a luminous blue sphere at its core represents a Liquidity Pool within a Crypto Derivatives OS. Surrounding rings symbolize intricate Market Microstructure, facilitating RFQ Protocol and High-Fidelity Execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-crypto-derivatives-rfq-protocol-core-mechanism.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/decision-making-framework/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A translucent blue algorithmic execution module intersects beige cylindrical conduits, exposing precision market microstructure components. This institutional-grade system for digital asset derivatives enables high-fidelity execution of block trades and private quotation via an advanced RFQ protocol, ensuring optimal capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-core-execution-architecture-intelligence-layer.jpg)

## Decision-Making Framework

Meaning ▴ A Decision-Making Framework represents a codified, systematic methodology designed to process inputs and generate optimal outputs for complex financial operations within institutional digital asset derivatives. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost-of-ownership/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A central dark aperture, like a precision matching engine, anchors four intersecting algorithmic pathways. Light-toned planes represent transparent liquidity pools, contrasting with dark teal sections signifying dark pool or latent liquidity](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine-9.jpg)

## Total Cost of Ownership

Meaning ▴ Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) represents a comprehensive financial estimate encompassing all direct and indirect expenditures associated with an asset or system throughout its entire operational lifecycle. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/implementation-timeline/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Geometric planes, light and dark, interlock around a central hexagonal core. This abstract visualization depicts an institutional-grade RFQ protocol engine, optimizing market microstructure for price discovery and high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives including Bitcoin options and multi-leg spreads within a Prime RFQ framework, ensuring atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-architecture.jpg)

## Implementation Timeline

Meaning ▴ An Implementation Timeline defines a structured sequence of critical milestones and their associated durations, meticulously planned for the deployment and operationalization of a new system, protocol, or functional enhancement within the institutional digital asset derivatives ecosystem. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/risk-mitigation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Intersecting transparent and opaque geometric planes, symbolizing the intricate market microstructure of institutional digital asset derivatives. Visualizes high-fidelity execution and price discovery via RFQ protocols, demonstrating multi-leg spread strategies and dark liquidity for capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-market-microstructure-architecture.jpg)

## Risk Mitigation

Meaning ▴ Risk Mitigation involves the systematic application of controls and strategies designed to reduce the probability or impact of adverse events on a system's operational integrity or financial performance. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/strategic-procurement/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A polished, dark spherical component anchors a sophisticated system architecture, flanked by a precise green data bus. This represents a high-fidelity execution engine, enabling institutional-grade RFQ protocols for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-core.jpg)

## Strategic Procurement

Meaning ▴ Strategic Procurement defines the systematic, data-driven methodology employed by institutional entities to acquire resources, services, or financial instruments, specifically within the complex domain of digital asset derivatives. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-should-an-organization-weight-cost-versus-technical-capability-in-an-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A metallic disc, reminiscent of a sophisticated market interface, features two precise pointers radiating from a glowing central hub. This visualizes RFQ protocols driving price discovery within institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-price-discovery.jpg)

## Technical Capability

An organization must weight technical capability as a value multiplier against the total cost of ownership, not as a separate, competing variable. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/news/crypto-funds-experience-significant-outflow-halting-prolonged-inflow-streak/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![The image displays a central circular mechanism, representing the core of an RFQ engine, surrounded by concentric layers signifying market microstructure and liquidity pool aggregation. A diagonal element intersects, symbolizing direct high-fidelity execution pathways for digital asset derivatives, optimized for capital efficiency and best execution through a Prime RFQ architecture](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-architecture-powering-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-high-fidelity-execution-via-optimized-rfq-protocols.jpg)

## Vendor Experience

This systemic shift in digital asset flows, driven by macroeconomic policy, necessitates a re-evaluation of capital allocation strategies for optimal portfolio resilience. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-in-evaluation-criteria-between-an-rfp-and-an-rfq-phase/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sophisticated digital asset derivatives execution platform showcases its core market microstructure. A speckled surface depicts real-time market data streams](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-core-microstructure.jpg)

## Pairwise Comparisons between Criteria

An RFP evaluates a partner's holistic capability to solve a problem; an RFQ evaluates a vendor's price to deliver a specification. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/analytical-hierarchy-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![An abstract system depicts an institutional-grade digital asset derivatives platform. Interwoven metallic conduits symbolize low-latency RFQ execution pathways, facilitating efficient block trade routing](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-rfq-execution-engine.jpg)

## Analytical Hierarchy Process

Meaning ▴ The Analytical Hierarchy Process is a structured technique for organizing and analyzing complex decisions, particularly those involving multiple criteria and subjective judgments. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A dark, glossy sphere atop a multi-layered base symbolizes a core intelligence layer for institutional RFQ protocols. This structure depicts high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives, including Bitcoin options, within a prime brokerage framework, enabling optimal price discovery and systemic risk mitigation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-rfq-protocol-architecture-for-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

## Rfp Evaluation

Meaning ▴ RFP Evaluation denotes the structured, systematic process undertaken by an institutional entity to assess and score vendor proposals submitted in response to a Request for Proposal, specifically for technology and services pertaining to institutional digital asset derivatives. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/weighted-scoring/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A dark, precision-engineered core system, with metallic rings and an active segment, represents a Prime RFQ for institutional digital asset derivatives. Its transparent, faceted shaft symbolizes high-fidelity RFQ protocol execution, real-time price discovery, and atomic settlement, ensuring capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-core-for-high-fidelity-rfq-protocol-execution-and-atomic-settlement.jpg)

## Weighted Scoring

Meaning ▴ Weighted Scoring defines a computational methodology where multiple input variables are assigned distinct coefficients or weights, reflecting their relative importance, before being aggregated into a single, composite metric. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-team/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A luminous digital asset core, symbolizing price discovery, rests on a dark liquidity pool. Surrounding metallic infrastructure signifies Prime RFQ and high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-core-high-fidelity-execution-engine-for-principal-trading.jpg)

## Evaluation Team

Meaning ▴ An Evaluation Team constitutes a dedicated internal or external unit systematically tasked with the rigorous assessment of technological systems, operational protocols, or trading strategies within the institutional digital asset derivatives domain. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-determine-the-appropriate-weighting-for-evaluation-criteria-in-an-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sophisticated mechanism features a segmented disc, indicating dynamic market microstructure and liquidity pool partitioning. This system visually represents an RFQ protocol's price discovery process, crucial for high-fidelity execution of institutional digital asset derivatives and managing counterparty risk within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/advanced-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-liquidity-aggregation-system.jpg)

## Evaluation Criteria

An RFP's evaluation criteria weighting is the strategic calibration of a decision-making architecture to deliver an optimal, defensible outcome. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-counterparty-performance-score-differ-from-a-traditional-credit-score/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A futuristic, metallic structure with reflective surfaces and a central optical mechanism, symbolizing a robust Prime RFQ for institutional digital asset derivatives. It enables high-fidelity execution of RFQ protocols, optimizing price discovery and liquidity aggregation across diverse liquidity pools with minimal slippage](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-platform-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-optimized-execution-management-system-with-robust-liquidity-sourcing.jpg)

## Weighted Score

A counterparty performance score is a dynamic, multi-factor model of transactional reliability, distinct from a traditional credit score's historical debt focus. </a>

**Tags:** [Strategic Procurement](https://options.greeks.live/area/strategic-procurement/), [Risk Mitigation](https://options.greeks.live/area/risk-mitigation/), [RFP Criteria](https://options.greeks.live/area/rfp-criteria/), [Decision-Making Framework](https://options.greeks.live/area/decision-making-framework/), [RFP Evaluation](https://options.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation/), [RFP Scoring Matrix](https://options.greeks.live/area/rfp-scoring-matrix/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [What Is the Role of Stakeholder Engagement in Defining RFP Evaluation Criteria?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-role-of-stakeholder-engagement-in-defining-rfp-evaluation-criteria/)
![A sleek, bi-component digital asset derivatives engine reveals its intricate core, symbolizing an advanced RFQ protocol. This Prime RFQ component enables high-fidelity execution and optimal price discovery within complex market microstructure, managing latent liquidity for institutional operations.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimal-execution.jpg)

Stakeholder engagement transforms diverse operational needs into a unified, data-driven logic for strategic vendor selection.

- 
### [How Should an Organization Balance Cost against Technical Capabilities in RFP Weighting?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-should-an-organization-balance-cost-against-technical-capabilities-in-rfp-weighting/)
![A segmented, teal-hued system component with a dark blue inset, symbolizing an RFQ engine within a Prime RFQ, emerges from darkness. Illuminated by an optimized data flow, its textured surface represents market microstructure intricacies, facilitating high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives via private quotation for multi-leg spreads.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-intelligence-layer-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq.jpg)

Balancing RFP weights is a data-driven codification of strategic priorities to maximize long-term value, not just minimize initial cost.

- 
### [What Are the Key Differences between a Tactical and a Strategic Approach to Rfp Evaluation?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-between-a-tactical-and-a-strategic-approach-to-rfp-evaluation/)
![Abstract forms depict institutional liquidity aggregation and smart order routing. Intersecting dark bars symbolize RFQ protocols enabling atomic settlement for multi-leg spreads, ensuring high-fidelity execution and price discovery of digital asset derivatives.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-high-fidelity-execution-2.jpg)

A tactical RFP evaluation procures a tool for a task; a strategic evaluation sources a capability for a mission.

- 
### [What Are the Most Common Pitfalls in Designing an Effective RFP Evaluation Criteria Matrix?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-pitfalls-in-designing-an-effective-rfp-evaluation-criteria-matrix/)
![Precision-engineered, stacked components embody a Principal OS for institutional digital asset derivatives. This multi-layered structure visually represents market microstructure elements within RFQ protocols, ensuring high-fidelity execution and liquidity aggregation. It enables atomic settlement and efficient portfolio margin for crypto options.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-os-architecture-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq.jpg)

An effective RFP evaluation matrix translates strategic priorities into a quantifiable, objective, and defensible decision architecture.

- 
### [How Do You Effectively Weight Rfp Evaluation Criteria for Different Types of Projects?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-effectively-weight-rfp-evaluation-criteria-for-different-types-of-projects/)
![Geometric shapes symbolize an institutional digital asset derivatives trading ecosystem. A pyramid denotes foundational quantitative analysis and the Principal's operational framework. A sphere represents dynamic liquidity and aggregated inquiry. Intersecting metallic planes illustrate high-fidelity execution and RFQ protocol pathways, optimizing market microstructure for multi-leg spreads.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system-microstructure.jpg)

Effective RFP criteria weighting translates strategic intent into a quantitative, defensible decision-making system.

- 
### [How Can a Company Ensure Its Rfp Evaluation Criteria Remain Aligned with Evolving Business Strategies?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-a-company-ensure-its-rfp-evaluation-criteria-remain-aligned-with-evolving-business-strategies/)
![A sophisticated mechanical core, split by contrasting illumination, represents an Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives RFQ engine. Its precise concentric mechanisms symbolize High-Fidelity Execution, Market Microstructure optimization, and Algorithmic Trading within a Prime RFQ, enabling optimal Price Discovery and Liquidity Aggregation.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-engine-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-precision-execution.jpg)

Align RFP criteria with strategy by treating it as a dynamic operating system, not a static checklist, ensuring continuous recalibration.

- 
### [What Is the Role of a Scoring Matrix in the RFP Evaluation Process?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-role-of-a-scoring-matrix-in-the-rfp-evaluation-process/)
![Sleek, futuristic metallic components showcase a dark, reflective dome encircled by a textured ring, representing a Volatility Surface for Digital Asset Derivatives. This Prime RFQ architecture enables High-Fidelity Execution and Private Quotation via RFQ Protocols for Block Trade liquidity.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/advanced-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-platform-architecture-for-high-fidelity-rfq-protocol-execution-and-price-discovery.jpg)

A scoring matrix is a quantitative decision-making architecture that translates vendor proposals into a defensible selection.

- 
### [What Are the Most Common Pitfalls in Rfp Evaluation and Scoring?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-pitfalls-in-rfp-evaluation-and-scoring/)
![A sleek, modular institutional grade system with glowing teal conduits represents advanced RFQ protocol pathways. This illustrates high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives, facilitating private quotation and efficient liquidity aggregation. The precise architecture suggests optimized market microstructure and atomic settlement for Bitcoin options and Ethereum futures.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-ecosystem-powering-high-fidelity-rfq-execution-and-optimal-liquidity-discovery.jpg)

A robust RFP evaluation protocol mitigates risk by systematically converting subjective inputs into objective, weighted, and defensible procurement decisions.

- 
### [What Is the Ideal Weight for Cost Criteria in a Strategic It Rfp Evaluation?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-ideal-weight-for-cost-criteria-in-a-strategic-it-rfp-evaluation/)
![Abstract visualization of institutional RFQ protocol for digital asset derivatives. Translucent layers symbolize dark liquidity pools within complex market microstructure. A central channel ensures high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement. Green nodes denote private quotation endpoints, enabling aggregated inquiry and price discovery.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine-6.jpg)

The ideal cost weight in an IT RFP is a dynamic variable, calibrated to the procurement's strategic importance.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "How Do You Determine the Appropriate Weights for Different Rfp Criteria?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-determine-the-appropriate-weights-for-different-rfp-criteria/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-determine-the-appropriate-weights-for-different-rfp-criteria/"
    },
    "headline": "How Do You Determine the Appropriate Weights for Different Rfp Criteria? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "Determining RFP criteria weights is the strategic calibration of a decision-making system to reflect an organization's core priorities and risk architecture. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-determine-the-appropriate-weights-for-different-rfp-criteria/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-07T09:09:05+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-08-07T09:09:09+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-architecture.jpg",
        "caption": "Intricate light and dark geometric planes converge on a central, multi-faceted core. This abstract architecture visualizes an institutional-grade RFQ protocol engine, engineered for high-fidelity execution of block trades and multi-leg spreads in digital asset derivatives. It optimizes market microstructure for price discovery and capital efficiency, integrating liquidity pools and market makers within a Prime RFQ. The system facilitates algorithmic trading and portfolio margin for Bitcoin options and Ethereum futures, ensuring atomic settlement and best execution."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Analytical Hierarchy Process",
        "Decision-Making Framework",
        "Evaluation Team",
        "Implementation Timeline",
        "Procurement Strategy",
        "RFP Criteria",
        "RFP Evaluation",
        "RFP Evaluation Criteria",
        "RFP Scoring Matrix",
        "Risk Mitigation",
        "Strategic Procurement",
        "Supplier Evaluation",
        "Total Cost",
        "Total Cost of Ownership",
        "Vendor Selection",
        "Weighted Scoring"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-determine-the-appropriate-weights-for-different-rfp-criteria/
