# How Do You Determine the Right Criteria for an RFP Triage System? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-09
**Categories:** Question

---

![An abstract composition of interlocking, precisely engineered metallic plates represents a sophisticated institutional trading infrastructure. Visible perforations within a central block symbolize optimized data conduits for high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-multi-leg-execution-layer.jpg)

![A macro view of a precision-engineered metallic component, representing the robust core of an Institutional Grade Prime RFQ. Its intricate Market Microstructure design facilitates Digital Asset Derivatives RFQ Protocols, enabling High-Fidelity Execution and Algorithmic Trading for Block Trades, ensuring Capital Efficiency and Best Execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-core-system-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-and-advanced-market-microstructure-optimization.jpg)

## Concept

Determining the right criteria for a Request for Proposal (RFP) [triage system](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-relationship-between-an-order-management-system-and-an-execution-management-system/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) begins with a fundamental recalibration of perspective. An [RFP triage system](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-triage-system/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) functions as a strategic filtration mechanism, an intelligent gateway designed to ensure that an organization’s most valuable resource, its operational focus, is directed only toward partnerships and solutions that exhibit a verifiable alignment with its core mission. The objective is to construct a system that operates with analytical precision, moving the evaluation process from a subjective art to a data-driven discipline. This system is the first line of defense against the immense organizational drag created by evaluating ill-fitting or strategically misaligned proposals.

The foundation of this mechanism rests upon a clear and unflinching articulation of organizational goals. Before any criteria can be defined, the institution must possess a granular understanding of what it seeks to achieve ▴ not just with the specific project, but within its broader strategic horizon. Is the primary driver cost reduction, technological transformation, market share expansion, or risk mitigation?

Each of these strategic pillars dictates a unique configuration of [evaluation criteria](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-determine-the-appropriate-weighting-for-evaluation-criteria-in-an-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). A system built for an institution focused on technological innovation will necessarily prioritize a vendor’s research and development pipeline and system architecture, while one built for a cost-focused entity will place a heavier computational emphasis on [total cost of ownership](https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost-of-ownership/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) models.

Consequently, the criteria themselves become manifestations of these strategic goals. They are the questions the organization asks of potential partners, and the quality of the answers received depends entirely on the precision of the questions asked. A robust triage system does not simply ask, “Can you perform this service?” Instead, it poses a series of deeply considered, multi-faceted inquiries ▴ “Demonstrate your capacity to integrate with our existing technology stack,” “Provide a quantitative analysis of the efficiencies your solution will generate,” or “Detail your security protocols and their alignment with ISO 27001 standards.” Each criterion is a vector, pointing toward a desired outcome, and the triage system is the engine that measures the magnitude and direction of each proposal along these vectors.

> A well-designed RFP triage system transforms the procurement process from a reactive sorting exercise into a proactive strategic alignment engine.

This initial phase of the process is critical. It involves a rigorous internal audit of needs, an honest assessment of priorities, and a collaborative effort to translate broad corporate objectives into specific, measurable, and attainable evaluation metrics. The involvement of cross-functional teams is indispensable in this stage. Representatives from finance, operations, technology, and legal departments bring distinct perspectives that enrich the criteria, ensuring that the selected solution is not just technically sound but also financially viable, operationally seamless, and compliant with all regulatory frameworks.

The resulting set of criteria forms the logical bedrock upon which the entire triage and evaluation superstructure is built. It is a declaration of intent, a clear signal to the market of what the organization values, and the first and most important step in forging successful, long-term strategic partnerships.

![A central, multi-layered cylindrical component rests on a highly reflective surface. This core quantitative analytics engine facilitates high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-core-optimization.jpg)

![A central control knob on a metallic platform, bisected by sharp reflective lines, embodies an institutional RFQ protocol. This depicts intricate market microstructure, enabling high-fidelity execution, precise price discovery for multi-leg options, and robust Prime RFQ deployment, optimizing latent liquidity across digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-rfq-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-engine-core-microstructure.jpg)

## Strategy

Developing a strategic framework for an RFP triage system requires moving beyond a simple checklist to architecting a dynamic [evaluation model](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-quantitative-metrics-used-in-a-dealer-performance-evaluation-model/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). The core of this strategy is the implementation of a [weighted scoring](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-simple-scoring-and-weighted-scoring-in-an-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) system, a methodology that assigns quantitative value to each criterion based on its relative importance to the organization’s strategic objectives. This approach provides a structured and defensible mechanism for comparing disparate proposals, transforming subjective impressions into an objective, data-centric analysis. The process of assigning these weights is a strategic exercise in itself, forcing stakeholders to engage in a disciplined conversation about what truly matters.

![A sophisticated institutional-grade device featuring a luminous blue core, symbolizing advanced price discovery mechanisms and high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives. This intelligence layer supports private quotation via RFQ protocols, enabling aggregated inquiry and atomic settlement within a Prime RFQ framework](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-core-intelligence.jpg)

## The Architecture of Evaluation Models

The design of the evaluation model is the strategic centerpiece of the triage system. While multiple models exist, the most effective systems often blend quantitative and qualitative assessments within a structured framework. The choice of model depends on the complexity of the procurement and the risk profile of the project.

- **Weighted Scoring** ▴ This is the most common and robust model. Each criterion is assigned a weight (usually as a percentage) that reflects its importance. A proposal’s score for that criterion is then multiplied by the weight to produce a weighted score. The sum of these weighted scores provides a total score for the proposal, allowing for direct comparison. For instance, in procuring a new cybersecurity platform, [data security](https://prime.greeks.live/area/data-security/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) might be weighted at 40%, while cost might be weighted at 20%.

- **Hurdle Model** ▴ In this approach, certain criteria are designated as “must-haves” or hurdles. A proposal must meet a minimum threshold on these critical criteria to even be considered for further evaluation. This is particularly useful for ensuring compliance with non-negotiable requirements, such as specific regulatory certifications or technical integrations. Any proposal that fails to clear a hurdle is immediately triaged out, regardless of its performance on other criteria.

- **Comparative Matrix** ▴ A [vendor selection matrix](https://prime.greeks.live/area/vendor-selection-matrix/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) provides a clear visual comparison of how different vendors perform against the key criteria. This tool is often used in conjunction with weighted scoring to facilitate discussion among the evaluation team. It lays out the scores and supporting qualitative notes side-by-side, making it easier to identify the strengths and weaknesses of each submission.

![A futuristic, institutional-grade sphere, diagonally split, reveals a glowing teal core of intricate circuitry. This represents a high-fidelity execution engine for digital asset derivatives, facilitating private quotation via RFQ protocols, embodying market microstructure for latent liquidity and precise price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-prime-os.jpg)

## Defining and Categorizing Criteria

A successful strategy involves grouping criteria into logical categories, which are then weighted. This provides a hierarchical structure to the evaluation, allowing for both high-level and granular analysis. Common categories include:

**1. Technical and Functional Fit** ▴ This category assesses the core capabilities of the proposed solution. Criteria here are highly specific and measurable, focusing on how well the solution meets the functional requirements outlined in the RFP.

**2. [Vendor Viability](https://prime.greeks.live/area/vendor-viability/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) and Experience** ▴ This looks beyond the solution to the provider itself. Criteria evaluate the vendor’s financial stability, track record, industry reputation, and the experience of the team that will be assigned to the project. Customer references and case studies are key data points in this category.

**3. Cost and Commercial Terms** ▴ This category encompasses a [total cost](https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) of ownership (TCO) analysis. It includes not only the upfront price but also implementation fees, training costs, ongoing maintenance, and any potential for future cost savings or revenue generation. The commercial terms, such as payment schedules and contract flexibility, are also evaluated here.

**4. Security and Compliance** ▴ For many procurements, especially in regulated industries, this is a critical hurdle category. Criteria assess the vendor’s data security posture, compliance with relevant regulations (like GDPR or HIPAA), and their disaster recovery and business continuity plans.

> A strategic triage framework ensures that every proposal is measured against the same, well-defined ruler, a ruler calibrated to the organization’s unique priorities.

![A central core, symbolizing a Crypto Derivatives OS and Liquidity Pool, is intersected by two abstract elements. These represent Multi-Leg Spread and Cross-Asset Derivatives executed via RFQ Protocol](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-multi-leg-spread-execution.jpg)

## The Strategic Value of Transparency

A cornerstone of a robust [RFP triage](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-triage/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) strategy is transparency with the participating vendors. This involves communicating the evaluation criteria, and often the weighting of those criteria, within the RFP document itself. This practice serves two primary strategic functions. First, it allows vendors to tailor their proposals to the organization’s stated priorities, resulting in higher-quality, more relevant submissions.

A vendor that knows technical capability accounts for 50% of the evaluation score will dedicate significant resources to detailing that aspect of their offer. Second, it establishes a foundation of fairness and trust, which is crucial for building a healthy long-term partnership. It signals that the decision will be made based on a methodical evaluation against pre-defined standards, not on arbitrary or hidden factors.

### Table 1 ▴ Comparison of Evaluation Model Focus

| Evaluation Model | Primary Strategic Focus | Best Suited For | Potential Limitation |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Weighted Scoring | Comprehensive, multi-faceted evaluation based on relative importance. | Complex, high-value procurements where multiple factors are critical. | Can be complex to set up; requires careful consensus on weights. |
| Hurdle Model | Ensuring non-negotiable requirements are met. | Procurements with critical compliance or technical prerequisites. | Does not differentiate between proposals that pass the hurdles. |
| Comparative Matrix | Visual side-by-side comparison and facilitation of team discussion. | Presenting evaluation results to a diverse group of stakeholders. | Is a presentation tool, relies on an underlying scoring model for data. |

Ultimately, the strategy behind an RFP triage system is about risk management and resource optimization. By creating a clear, structured, and transparent evaluation framework, an organization can significantly reduce the risk of selecting the wrong partner, minimize the time and effort wasted on irrelevant proposals, and increase the likelihood of achieving the strategic goals that prompted the RFP in the first place. The system becomes a core component of strategic procurement, a mechanism that aligns every purchasing decision with the overarching direction of the enterprise.

![A central glowing core within metallic structures symbolizes an Institutional Grade RFQ engine. This Intelligence Layer enables optimal Price Discovery and High-Fidelity Execution for Digital Asset Derivatives, streamlining Block Trade and Multi-Leg Spread Atomic Settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-microstructure-core.jpg)

![A precisely engineered central blue hub anchors segmented grey and blue components, symbolizing a robust Prime RFQ for institutional trading of digital asset derivatives. This structure represents a sophisticated RFQ protocol engine, optimizing liquidity pool aggregation and price discovery through advanced market microstructure for high-fidelity execution and private quotation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/prime-os-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-core-systemic-hub.jpg)

## Execution

The execution phase of an RFP triage system translates strategic design into operational reality. This is where abstract criteria and models are forged into a functioning, repeatable, and auditable process. A flawlessly executed system operates like a high-performance engine, systematically processing inputs and generating clear, data-driven outputs that guide decision-making with precision.

This requires a deep focus on process engineering, quantitative rigor, and technological enablement. The ultimate goal is to create an operational framework that is not only efficient but also intelligent, learning and adapting over time to improve the quality of procurement outcomes.

![A precision-engineered blue mechanism, symbolizing a high-fidelity execution engine, emerges from a rounded, light-colored liquidity pool component, encased within a sleek teal institutional-grade shell. This represents a Principal's operational framework for digital asset derivatives, demonstrating algorithmic trading logic and smart order routing for block trades via RFQ protocols, ensuring atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-crypto-derivatives-os-core-algorithmic-execution-engine.jpg)

## The Operational Playbook

Implementing a successful RFP triage system is a multi-stage process that demands meticulous planning and disciplined execution. This playbook outlines the critical steps for building the system from the ground up.

- **Needs Analysis and Stakeholder Alignment** ▴ 

<li>**Assemble the Core Team** ▴ The first action is to form a [cross-functional evaluation](https://prime.greeks.live/area/cross-functional-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) committee. This team should include representatives from every department that will be impacted by the procurement decision, including IT, finance, legal, and the primary business users.

- **Define Project Goals and Scope** ▴ Conduct a series of structured workshops with the core team to clearly articulate the primary objectives of the project. What specific problem is being solved? What are the desired business outcomes? The output of this stage should be a formal Project Charter that is signed off by all stakeholders.

- **Identify Non-Negotiable Requirements** ▴ Determine the absolute “must-have” criteria, or hurdles. These are the make-or-break factors, such as compliance with a specific data security standard or the ability to integrate with a legacy enterprise system. These will form the first and most critical gate in the triage process.

</li>
- **Criteria Development and Weighting** ▴ 

<li>**Brainstorm a Comprehensive List** ▴ Drawing from the project goals, the team should brainstorm an exhaustive list of potential evaluation criteria. These should cover all relevant domains ▴ technical, financial, operational, and vendor-related.

- **Refine and Categorize** ▴ Group the brainstormed items into logical categories (e.g. Functional Capabilities, Vendor Viability, Total Cost of Ownership, Implementation & Support). Within each category, refine the criteria to be as specific, measurable, and unambiguous as possible.

- **Assign Weights** ▴ This is a critical step requiring consensus from the [evaluation committee](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-should-an-rfp-evaluation-committee-be-structured-to-ensure-an-unbiased-and-effective-decision/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). The team must debate and agree upon the relative importance of each category and each individual criterion. The sum of all category weights must equal 100%. This process forces a disciplined prioritization of what matters most.

</li>
- **RFP Document and Triage System Construction** ▴ 

<li>**Embed Criteria in the RFP** ▴ The finalized, weighted criteria should be explicitly stated in the RFP document provided to vendors. This transparency ensures that vendors focus their responses on the areas of greatest importance to the organization.

- **Build the Scoring Template** ▴ Create a detailed scoring spreadsheet or utilize a dedicated RFP automation software. This template should list all criteria, their weights, a defined scoring scale (e.g. 0-5), and fields for evaluators to provide qualitative justifications for their scores.

- **Establish Scoring Guidelines** ▴ To ensure consistency, develop a scoring guide that defines what each value on the scale represents. For example, a score of 5 on “Ease of Use” might be defined as “Fully intuitive interface, requires less than one hour of training for a new user,” while a 1 might be “Clunky interface, requires extensive multi-day training.”

</li>
- **Evaluation and Triage Process** ▴ 

<li>**Initial Compliance Screen (Hurdle Check)** ▴ Upon receipt, all proposals are first screened against the non-negotiable hurdle criteria. Any proposal that fails this initial check is immediately triaged out and the vendor is notified.

- **Individual Evaluation** ▴ The remaining proposals are distributed to the members of the evaluation committee. Each member scores the proposals independently using the established scoring template and guidelines, without conferring with other members. This prevents groupthink and ensures a diversity of initial perspectives.

- **Consensus Meeting** ▴ The committee then convenes for a consensus meeting. The facilitator reviews the scores for each proposal, criterion by criterion. Where there are significant discrepancies in scores, the respective evaluators explain their rationale. The goal of the meeting is to discuss these differences and arrive at a single, consensus score for each criterion. Averaging scores without discussion is not a best practice.

- **Shortlisting** ▴ Based on the final consensus scores, the top-scoring proposals (typically 2-3) are shortlisted for the next phase, which may include product demonstrations, reference checks, or contract negotiations. All non-shortlisted vendors are notified.

</li>

![Precision-engineered modular components display a central control, data input panel, and numerical values on cylindrical elements. This signifies an institutional Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives, enabling RFQ protocol aggregation, high-fidelity execution, algorithmic price discovery, and volatility surface calibration for portfolio margin](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/firm-fx-options-rfq-trade-system-key-microstructure-data-flow-core-engine.jpg)

## Quantitative Modeling and Data Analysis

The core of an objective triage system is its quantitative model. This model translates qualitative assessments and vendor promises into a structured, comparable dataset. The rigor of this model is what elevates the process from simple comparison to true analysis.

The primary tool is the [weighted scoring model](https://prime.greeks.live/area/weighted-scoring-model/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). The formula for a single criterion’s score is:

Weighted Score = (Raw Score / Maximum Possible Raw Score) Criterion Weight

The total score for a vendor is the sum of all weighted scores. Let’s consider a hypothetical RFP for a new Customer Relationship Management (CRM) platform. The evaluation committee has established the following criteria and weights:

### Table 2 ▴ CRM Platform RFP – Criteria and Weighting

| Category | Criterion | Weight (%) | Scoring Scale |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Functional Capabilities (40%) | Contact Management & Automation | 15% | 0-5 |
| Technical Fit (25%) | API & Integration Capabilities | 15% | 0-5 |
| Total Cost of Ownership (20%) | 5-Year TCO Calculation | 15% | 0-5 |
| Vendor Viability (15%) | Customer References & Case Studies | 10% | 0-5 |

Now, let’s assume three vendors (A, B, and C) have submitted proposals. After the individual and consensus evaluation phases, the committee has assigned the following raw scores:

### Table 3 ▴ Raw Consensus Scores for CRM Vendors

| Criterion | Weight (%) | Vendor A Raw Score | Vendor B Raw Score | Vendor C Raw Score |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Contact Management & Automation | 15% | 5 | 4 | 5 |
| Reporting & Analytics Suite | 15% | 3 | 5 | 4 |
| Mobile Accessibility | 10% | 5 | 3 | 4 |
| API & Integration Capabilities | 15% | 4 | 5 | 3 |
| Data Security & Compliance | 10% | 5 | 5 | 4 |
| 5-Year TCO Calculation | 15% | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| Contractual Flexibility | 5% | 4 | 3 | 5 |
| Customer References & Case Studies | 10% | 4 | 5 | 3 |
| Implementation Support & Training | 5% | 3 | 4 | 4 |

Using the weighted scoring formula, we can now calculate the final scores. For Vendor A on “Contact Management & Automation” ▴ Weighted Score = (5 / 5) 15% = 15.0. For Vendor B on the same criterion ▴ Weighted Score = (4 / 5) 15% = 12.0. Performing this calculation for all criteria yields the final results:

**Vendor A Final Score** ▴ (5/5) 15 + (3/5) 15 + (5/5) 10 + (4/5) 15 + (5/5) 10 + (3/5) 15 + (4/5) 5 + (4/5) 10 + (3/5) 5 = 15 + 9 + 10 + 12 + 10 + 9 + 4 + 8 + 3 = **80.0**

**Vendor B Final Score** ▴ (4/5) 15 + (5/5) 15 + (3/5) 10 + (5/5) 15 + (5/5) 10 + (4/5) 15 + (3/5) 5 + (5/5) 10 + (4/5) 5 = 12 + 15 + 6 + 15 + 10 + 12 + 3 + 10 + 4 = **87.0**

**Vendor C Final Score** ▴ (5/5) 15 + (4/5) 15 + (4/5) 10 + (3/5) 15 + (4/5) 10 + (5/5) 15 + (5/5) 5 + (3/5) 10 + (4/5) 5 = 15 + 12 + 8 + 9 + 8 + 15 + 5 + 6 + 4 = **82.0**

Based on this quantitative analysis, Vendor B emerges as the leader with a score of 87.0. This data-driven result provides a solid foundation for the decision to shortlist Vendor B, along with Vendor C as a strong second option, for the final round of evaluations. The model clearly shows that while Vendor A had excellent mobile and security features, its weaker reporting and cost profile pulled its score down.

Vendor C was the most cost-effective but lagged in technical integration and vendor experience. Vendor B presented the most balanced, high-scoring proposal across the most heavily weighted categories.

![A dark, precision-engineered core system, with metallic rings and an active segment, represents a Prime RFQ for institutional digital asset derivatives. Its transparent, faceted shaft symbolizes high-fidelity RFQ protocol execution, real-time price discovery, and atomic settlement, ensuring capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-core-for-high-fidelity-rfq-protocol-execution-and-atomic-settlement.jpg)

## Predictive Scenario Analysis

A leading regional asset management firm, “Northwood Capital,” with $50 billion in AUM, initiated an RFP to replace its aging, on-premise portfolio management system (PMS). The existing system was becoming a significant operational bottleneck, hindering the firm’s ability to launch new, complex investment products and providing subpar reporting capabilities for its institutional clients. The strategic goal was clear ▴ acquire a modern, scalable, cloud-native PMS that could support multi-asset class trading, provide sophisticated risk analytics, and offer a state-of-the-art client reporting portal. The project lead, a seasoned operations director named Maria, was tasked with running a rigorous, data-driven selection process.

Maria began by assembling a cross-functional team with members from portfolio management, trading, compliance, IT, and client services. In their initial workshops, they defined the core project pillars ▴ 1) enhanced operational efficiency, 2) superior analytical and reporting capabilities, and 3) robust security and scalability. These pillars were translated into a detailed weighted scoring model. “Functional Capabilities,” including multi-asset support and advanced analytics, was given the highest weighting at 40%.

“Technology & Architecture,” focusing on API openness and cloud infrastructure, was weighted at 25%. “Total Cost of Ownership” and “Vendor Viability” were weighted at 20% and 15%, respectively. A critical hurdle was also established ▴ the vendor must have SOC 2 Type II certification, a non-negotiable for the firm’s institutional client base.

The RFP, including the detailed scoring criteria, was sent to six leading PMS vendors. Upon receipt, Maria’s team immediately performed the hurdle check. One vendor, despite offering a feature-rich platform at a low price, could not provide a SOC 2 report and was immediately triaged out. This single, objective check saved the team dozens of hours of evaluation time.

The five remaining proposals were then put through the full evaluation process. Each committee member scored the proposals independently over a two-week period. The quantitative data from the scoring templates was then aggregated. The results showed two clear front-runners, “[FinSys Prime](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-differences-in-risk-management-protocols-between-prime-brokers/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)” and “Apex Portfolio,” with scores of 88 and 85, respectively.

A third vendor, “Quantum Analytics,” scored a distant 72, while the other two were below 70. The triage system had effectively narrowed the field by 50% based on quantifiable data.

During the consensus meeting, the team debated the scores. The portfolio managers had scored FinSys Prime highly on its analytics, while the IT team was impressed with Apex Portfolio’s well-documented API and microservices architecture. The cost analysis showed that FinSys Prime had a higher initial license fee, but Apex Portfolio had higher projected data migration and integration costs, making their 5-year TCO nearly identical.

The triage model prevented a single factor, like the initial sticker price, from unduly influencing the decision. It forced a holistic view.

Based on the close scores and the distinct strengths of the top two, both FinSys Prime and Apex Portfolio were shortlisted for the final phase ▴ a full-day, scripted product demonstration. The script for the demo was derived directly from the highest-weighted criteria in their evaluation model. The vendors were asked to demonstrate specific workflows, from executing a multi-leg options trade to generating a complex, client-ready performance attribution report. This final step provided the qualitative context to the quantitative scores.

Ultimately, FinSys Prime’s superior user interface and more intuitive reporting module won over the portfolio management team, the primary users of the system. While Apex was technically robust, the team felt FinSys would have a higher user adoption rate, leading to greater long-term value. The final decision was made to select FinSys Prime, a choice directly supported by the 88-point score from the triage system and validated by the qualitative deep-dive. The entire process was documented, providing a clear, auditable trail that justified the multi-million dollar investment to the firm’s board.

![A sphere split into light and dark segments, revealing a luminous core. This encapsulates the precise Request for Quote RFQ protocol for institutional digital asset derivatives, highlighting high-fidelity execution, optimal price discovery, and advanced market microstructure within aggregated liquidity pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-execution-framework-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-request-for-quote-protocol-optimization.jpg)

## System Integration and Technological Architecture

The technological backbone of an RFP triage system is as critical as the criteria it processes. While a simple triage can be managed with spreadsheets, a truly robust, scalable, and auditable system requires a more sophisticated technological architecture. This architecture is designed to ensure data integrity, automate workflows, and provide powerful analytics.

At its core, the system requires a centralized database. This could be a SQL or NoSQL database designed to store all information related to the RFP process. The database schema must be structured to hold not just the vendor proposals themselves, but all the associated metadata ▴ vendor information, submission timestamps, evaluator assignments, individual scores, qualitative comments, and final consensus data. This structured data repository is the foundation for all other system components.

Workflow automation is layered on top of the database. This is where modern RFP management software provides significant value. These platforms automate the tedious, manual tasks that can bog down the process. Key automated workflows include:

- **Proposal Submission Portal** ▴ A secure, web-based portal for vendors to upload their proposals. This ensures all submissions are received in a standardized format and that all required documents are included.

- **Automated Notifications** ▴ The system automatically sends reminders to evaluators about scoring deadlines, notifies vendors upon successful submission, and informs them of their status (e.g. triaged out, shortlisted).

- **Scoring and Aggregation** ▴ The system presents evaluators with a clean, digital interface for entering their scores and comments. It then automatically calculates the weighted scores, eliminating the risk of manual spreadsheet errors.

Integration with other enterprise systems is a hallmark of a mature architecture. This is typically achieved through APIs (Application Programming Interfaces). For example, the RFP system could integrate with:

- **Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) System** ▴ To pull vendor financial health data or to push final contract information once a vendor is selected.

- **Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC) Platform** ▴ To cross-reference vendors against risk watchlists or to log security and compliance-related criteria and scores for auditing purposes.

- **Single Sign-On (SSO) Provider** ▴ To simplify user access for the evaluation committee and ensure secure authentication.

Finally, the analytical layer provides the strategic insight. The system should include a dashboarding and reporting module that allows the procurement team to visualize the evaluation data. This could include leaderboards showing the top-scoring vendors in real-time, charts breaking down scores by category, and reports that provide a full audit trail of the entire evaluation process. This analytical capability transforms the triage system from a simple administrative tool into a strategic asset that provides deep insights into procurement decisions.

![A sleek, abstract system interface with a central spherical lens representing real-time Price Discovery and Implied Volatility analysis for institutional Digital Asset Derivatives. Its precise contours signify High-Fidelity Execution and robust RFQ protocol orchestration, managing latent liquidity and minimizing slippage for optimized Alpha Generation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-via-optimized-rfq-protocols-enhancing-market-microstructure.jpg)

## References

- Responsive. (2021). A Guide to RFP Evaluation Criteria ▴ Basics, Tips, and Examples. Responsive.

- Graphite Connect. (2024). RFP Process Best Practices ▴ 10 Steps to Success. Graphite Connect.

- Procurement Tactics. (2025). 12 RFP Evaluation Criteria to Consider in 2025. Procurement Tactics.

- Oboloo. (2024). RFP Scoring Template Excel ▴ Simplifying Supplier Evaluation with Vendor Scorecards. Oboloo.

- Purchasing and Contracting Services, University of California, Santa Cruz. (n.d.). PROCUREMENT SCORING.

- Kodiak Hub. (2025). The Ultimate Vendor Selection Framework for 2025. Kodiak Hub.

- DeepStream. (n.d.). RFP Automation & 3 Reasons Why It’s Essential for Your Org. DeepStream.

- Parseur. (2024). How can automation speed up the RFP process?. Parseur.

![A light sphere, representing a Principal's digital asset, is integrated into an angular blue RFQ protocol framework. Sharp fins symbolize high-fidelity execution and price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principals-core-asset-rfq-protocol-framework-for-digital-derivatives.jpg)

## Reflection

The construction of an RFP triage system is an exercise in institutional self-awareness. The process of defining, weighting, and measuring criteria compels an organization to look inward and articulate its priorities with uncompromising clarity. The final system is more than a procurement tool; it is a mirror reflecting the organization’s strategic intent. The data it generates provides a quantitative narrative of each potential partnership, assessed against a benchmark of the organization’s own design.

The true power of this system, therefore, resides not just in its ability to select the right vendor, but in its capacity to reinforce and execute corporate strategy with every major purchasing decision. The framework is a mechanism for discipline, ensuring that operational choices remain tethered to the highest-level objectives of the enterprise. The ultimate advantage is a procurement function that operates as a strategic driver, consistently allocating capital and resources toward solutions that create a measurable, sustainable competitive edge.

![An Institutional Grade RFQ Engine core for Digital Asset Derivatives. This Prime RFQ Intelligence Layer ensures High-Fidelity Execution, driving Optimal Price Discovery and Atomic Settlement for Aggregated Inquiries](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-core-high-fidelity.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-triage-system/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A dark, reflective surface features a segmented circular mechanism, reminiscent of an RFQ aggregation engine or liquidity pool. Specks suggest market microstructure dynamics or data latency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-options-rfq-execution-microstructure-prime-os.jpg)

## Rfp Triage System

Meaning ▴ An RFP Triage System is an automated or semi-automated process designed to quickly categorize, prioritize, and route incoming Request for Proposal (RFP) submissions based on predefined criteria. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-relationship-between-an-order-management-system-and-an-execution-management-system/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sophisticated modular apparatus, likely a Prime RFQ component, showcases high-fidelity execution capabilities. Its interconnected sections, featuring a central glowing intelligence layer, suggest a robust RFQ protocol engine](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-rfq-engine-core-for-digital-asset-derivatives-high-fidelity-execution-protocols.jpg)

## Triage System

The OMS codifies investment strategy into compliant, executable orders; the EMS translates those orders into optimized market interaction. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost-of-ownership/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precision-engineered metallic institutional trading platform, bisected by an execution pathway, features a central blue RFQ protocol engine. This Crypto Derivatives OS core facilitates high-fidelity execution, optimal price discovery, and multi-leg spread trading, reflecting advanced market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-core-facilitating-rfq-protocol-driven-optimal-price-discovery-and-multi-leg-spread-trading-for-capital-efficiency.jpg)

## Total Cost of Ownership

Meaning ▴ Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) is a comprehensive financial metric that quantifies the direct and indirect costs associated with acquiring, operating, and maintaining a product or system throughout its entire lifecycle. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-determine-the-appropriate-weighting-for-evaluation-criteria-in-an-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A futuristic, intricate central mechanism with luminous blue accents represents a Prime RFQ for Digital Asset Derivatives Price Discovery. Four sleek, curved panels extending outwards signify diverse Liquidity Pools and RFQ channels for Block Trade High-Fidelity Execution, minimizing Slippage and Latency in Market Microstructure operations](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-platform-2.jpg)

## Evaluation Criteria

An RFP's evaluation criteria weighting is the strategic calibration of a decision-making architecture to deliver an optimal, defensible outcome. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-quantitative-metrics-used-in-a-dealer-performance-evaluation-model/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![An exposed institutional digital asset derivatives engine reveals its market microstructure. The polished disc represents a liquidity pool for price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system.jpg)

## Evaluation Model

A dealer performance model quantifies execution quality through Transaction Cost Analysis to minimize costs and maximize alpha. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-simple-scoring-and-weighted-scoring-in-an-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sophisticated digital asset derivatives trading mechanism features a central processing hub with luminous blue accents, symbolizing an intelligence layer driving high fidelity execution. Transparent circular elements represent dynamic liquidity pools and a complex volatility surface, revealing market microstructure and atomic settlement via an advanced RFQ protocol](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution-framework-optimizing-market-microstructure-price-discovery-intelligence-layer.jpg)

## Weighted Scoring

Simple scoring offers operational ease; weighted scoring provides strategic precision by prioritizing key criteria. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/data-security/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A central toroidal structure and intricate core are bisected by two blades: one algorithmic with circuits, the other solid. This symbolizes an institutional digital asset derivatives platform, leveraging RFQ protocols for high-fidelity execution and price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-hub-integrating-algorithmic-intelligence-for-high-fidelity-price-discovery-and-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## Data Security

Meaning ▴ Data Security, within the systems architecture of crypto and institutional investing, represents the comprehensive set of measures and protocols implemented to protect digital assets and information from unauthorized access, corruption, or theft throughout their lifecycle. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/vendor-selection-matrix/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precise digital asset derivatives trading mechanism, featuring transparent data conduits symbolizing RFQ protocol execution and multi-leg spread strategies. Intricate gears visualize market microstructure, ensuring high-fidelity execution and robust price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-framework.jpg)

## Vendor Selection Matrix

Meaning ▴ A Vendor Selection Matrix is a structured analytical tool employed to systematically evaluate and compare prospective vendors or service providers against a predefined set of criteria. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/vendor-viability/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A glossy, segmented sphere with a luminous blue 'X' core represents a Principal's Prime RFQ. It highlights multi-dealer RFQ protocols, high-fidelity execution, and atomic settlement for institutional digital asset derivatives, signifying unified liquidity pools, market microstructure, and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/prime-os-core-for-best-rfq-digital-asset-derivatives-institutional-trade-flow.jpg)

## Vendor Viability

Meaning ▴ Vendor viability refers to the assessment of a third-party supplier's capacity, financial stability, and operational integrity to deliver agreed-upon products or services consistently and reliably. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A glowing green ring encircles a dark, reflective sphere, symbolizing a principal's intelligence layer for high-fidelity RFQ execution. It reflects intricate market microstructure, signifying precise algorithmic trading for institutional digital asset derivatives, optimizing price discovery and managing latent liquidity](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/core-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system-hub.jpg)

## Total Cost

Meaning ▴ Total Cost represents the aggregated sum of all expenditures incurred in a specific process, project, or acquisition, encompassing both direct and indirect financial outlays. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-triage/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek metallic teal execution engine, representing a Crypto Derivatives OS, interfaces with a luminous pre-trade analytics display. This abstract view depicts institutional RFQ protocols enabling high-fidelity execution for multi-leg spreads, optimizing market microstructure and atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/advanced-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-market-microstructure-analysis.jpg)

## Rfp Triage

Meaning ▴ RFP triage is the initial assessment and categorization of incoming Requests for Proposal (RFPs) to determine their suitability, priority, and resource requirements before committing to a full response. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/cross-functional-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A modular, spherical digital asset derivatives intelligence core, featuring a glowing teal central lens, rests on a stable dark base. This represents the precision RFQ protocol execution engine, facilitating high-fidelity execution and robust price discovery within an institutional principal's operational framework](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-trading-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-core.jpg)

## Cross-Functional Evaluation

Meaning ▴ Cross-functional evaluation represents a systematic assessment process that incorporates perspectives, data, and expertise from multiple departments or specialized teams within an organization to appraise a project, system, or vendor. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-should-an-rfp-evaluation-committee-be-structured-to-ensure-an-unbiased-and-effective-decision/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precision-engineered component, like an RFQ protocol engine, displays a reflective blade and numerical data. It symbolizes high-fidelity execution within market microstructure, driving price discovery, capital efficiency, and algorithmic trading for institutional Digital Asset Derivatives on a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-execution-engine-core-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-price-discovery.jpg)

## Evaluation Committee

A structured RFP committee, governed by pre-defined criteria and bias mitigation protocols, ensures defensible and high-value procurement decisions. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/weighted-scoring-model/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Close-up of intricate mechanical components symbolizing a robust Prime RFQ for institutional digital asset derivatives. These precision parts reflect market microstructure and high-fidelity execution within an RFQ protocol framework, ensuring capital efficiency and optimal price discovery for Bitcoin options](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/engineered-core-systems-driving-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution.jpg)

## Weighted Scoring Model

Meaning ▴ A Weighted Scoring Model defines a quantitative analytical tool used to evaluate and prioritize multiple alternatives by assigning different levels of importance, or weights, to various evaluation criteria. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-differences-in-risk-management-protocols-between-prime-brokers/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Central polished disc, with contrasting segments, represents Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives Prime RFQ core. A textured rod signifies RFQ Protocol High-Fidelity Execution and Low Latency Market Microstructure data flow to the Quantitative Analysis Engine for Price Discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-core-system-high-fidelity.jpg)

## Finsys Prime

The primary differences in prime broker risk protocols lie in the sophistication of their margin models and collateral systems. </a>

**Tags:** [RFP Triage System](https://options.greeks.live/area/rfp-triage-system/), [Vendor Selection Matrix](https://options.greeks.live/area/vendor-selection-matrix/), [Total Cost of Ownership](https://options.greeks.live/area/total-cost-of-ownership/), [Strategic Sourcing](https://options.greeks.live/area/strategic-sourcing/), [Weighted Scoring Model](https://options.greeks.live/area/weighted-scoring-model/), [RFP Evaluation](https://options.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [How Do You Create an Objective Vendor Scoring System for an Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-create-an-objective-vendor-scoring-system-for-an-rfp/)
![Intersecting metallic structures symbolize RFQ protocol pathways for institutional digital asset derivatives. They represent high-fidelity execution of multi-leg spreads across diverse liquidity pools. Spheres denote aggregated inquiry and price discovery within a robust Prime RFQ, optimizing capital efficiency and mitigating systemic risk.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-framework-optimizing-multi-leg-spreads-and-liquidity-aggregation-for-best-execution.jpg)

An objective vendor scoring system translates strategic priorities into a quantitative, defensible decision-making framework.

- 
### [When Is a Price-Focused Rfp Evaluation Model the More Appropriate Strategic Choice?](https://options.greeks.live/question/when-is-a-price-focused-rfp-evaluation-model-the-more-appropriate-strategic-choice/)
![A segmented rod traverses a multi-layered spherical structure, depicting a streamlined Institutional RFQ Protocol. This visual metaphor illustrates optimal Digital Asset Derivatives price discovery, high-fidelity execution, and robust liquidity pool integration, minimizing slippage and ensuring atomic settlement for multi-leg spreads within a Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-flow-1.jpg)

A price-focused RFP is the optimal choice when procuring a commoditized good or service with rigorously defined specifications.

- 
### [How Do You Effectively Weight Evaluation Criteria in a Complex It Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-effectively-weight-evaluation-criteria-in-a-complex-it-rfp/)
![The central teal core signifies a Principal's Prime RFQ, routing RFQ protocols across modular arms. Metallic levers denote precise control over multi-leg spread execution and block trades. This framework ensures high-fidelity execution, optimal price discovery, and efficient management of latent liquidity for institutional digital asset derivatives.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principals-prime-os-rfq-system-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

A system for translating strategic priorities into a quantitative, defensible framework for high-stakes technology acquisition.

- 
### [What Are the Best Practices for Creating a Truly Effective RFP Scoring Rubric?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-best-practices-for-creating-a-truly-effective-rfp-scoring-rubric/)
![A sophisticated teal and black device with gold accents symbolizes a Principal's operational framework for institutional digital asset derivatives. It represents a high-fidelity execution engine, integrating RFQ protocols for atomic settlement. This intelligence layer optimizes price discovery, managing portfolio margin and ensuring best execution in market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-core-engine-for-best-execution.jpg)

An effective RFP scoring rubric is a systemically designed, weight-calibrated instrument that translates strategic priorities into objective, defensible vendor selection.

- 
### [What Is the Most Effective Way to Weight RFP Scoring Criteria?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-most-effective-way-to-weight-rfp-scoring-criteria/)
![Intersecting muted geometric planes, with a central glossy blue sphere. This abstract visualizes market microstructure for institutional digital asset derivatives. The sphere embodies a block trade or private quotation via RFQ protocols, ensuring high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement on a Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-5.jpg)

The most effective RFP weighting method transforms procurement into a strategic exercise by creating a data-driven value model.

- 
### [How Should an Organization Determine the Appropriate Weights for Different Rfp Evaluation Criteria?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-should-an-organization-determine-the-appropriate-weights-for-different-rfp-evaluation-criteria/)
![A vibrant blue digital asset, encircled by a sleek metallic ring representing an RFQ protocol, emerges from a reflective Prime RFQ surface. This visualizes sophisticated market microstructure and high-fidelity execution within an institutional liquidity pool, ensuring optimal price discovery and capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-execution-framework.jpg)

A structured RFP weighting model translates strategic priorities into a quantitative, defensible vendor selection framework.

- 
### [What Are the Most Common Variables to Test in an RFP Evaluation Model Sensitivity Analysis?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-variables-to-test-in-an-rfp-evaluation-model-sensitivity-analysis/)
![A central glowing core within metallic structures symbolizes an Institutional Grade RFQ engine. This Intelligence Layer enables optimal Price Discovery and High-Fidelity Execution for Digital Asset Derivatives, streamlining Block Trade and Multi-Leg Spread Atomic Settlement.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-microstructure-core.jpg)

A sensitivity analysis tests how RFP evaluation outcomes change when key variables like cost, quality scores, and criteria weights are adjusted.

- 
### [How Do You Effectively Weight Criteria in an Rfp Scoring Model?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-effectively-weight-criteria-in-an-rfp-scoring-model/)
![Two dark, circular, precision-engineered components, stacked and reflecting, symbolize a Principal's Operational Framework. This layered architecture facilitates High-Fidelity Execution for Block Trades via RFQ Protocols, ensuring Atomic Settlement and Capital Efficiency within Market Microstructure for Digital Asset Derivatives.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-execution-protocol.jpg)

An RFP scoring model is a quantitative framework for translating strategic priorities into a defensible, data-driven vendor selection decision.

- 
### [What Are the Most Critical Skills for an Rfp Evaluation Team Lead to Possess for a Successful Outcome?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-critical-skills-for-an-rfp-evaluation-team-lead-to-possess-for-a-successful-outcome/)
![A sophisticated institutional-grade device featuring a luminous blue core, symbolizing advanced price discovery mechanisms and high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives. This intelligence layer supports private quotation via RFQ protocols, enabling aggregated inquiry and atomic settlement within a Prime RFQ framework.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-core-intelligence.jpg)

An RFP evaluation team lead's critical skills are analytical rigor, strategic foresight, and the ability to architect a fair, defensible decision-making process.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "How Do You Determine the Right Criteria for an RFP Triage System?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-determine-the-right-criteria-for-an-rfp-triage-system/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-determine-the-right-criteria-for-an-rfp-triage-system/"
    },
    "headline": "How Do You Determine the Right Criteria for an RFP Triage System? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "An RFP triage system's criteria are determined by translating core strategic goals into a weighted, quantitative evaluation model. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-determine-the-right-criteria-for-an-rfp-triage-system/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-09T15:07:14+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-10-30T13:36:30+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-engine-optimal-institutional-digital-asset-execution-system.jpg",
        "caption": "A sophisticated, multi-segmented cream and dark gray automated device, symbolizing a core Prime RFQ component for institutional trading. It represents advanced RFQ protocols for digital asset derivatives, enabling high-fidelity execution of block trades and multi-leg spreads. This execution management system ensures capital efficiency and best execution, leveraging quantitative analysis for price discovery and counterparty risk mitigation."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Compliance Hurdle",
        "Cross-Functional Evaluation",
        "Data Security",
        "Procurement Automation",
        "Proposal Scoring",
        "Quantitative Vendor Analysis",
        "RFP Evaluation",
        "RFP Evaluation Criteria",
        "RFP Triage",
        "RFP Triage System",
        "Strategic Sourcing",
        "Total Cost",
        "Total Cost of Ownership",
        "Vendor Selection Matrix",
        "Vendor Viability",
        "Weighted Scoring Model"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-determine-the-right-criteria-for-an-rfp-triage-system/
