# How Do You Effectively Weight Non-Price Criteria in an RFP Evaluation? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-07
**Categories:** Question

---

![A sophisticated, modular mechanical assembly illustrates an RFQ protocol for institutional digital asset derivatives. Reflective elements and distinct quadrants symbolize dynamic liquidity aggregation and high-fidelity execution for Bitcoin options](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-architecture.jpg)

![A precise digital asset derivatives trading mechanism, featuring transparent data conduits symbolizing RFQ protocol execution and multi-leg spread strategies. Intricate gears visualize market microstructure, ensuring high-fidelity execution and robust price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-framework.jpg)

## Concept

An [RFP evaluation](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) process moves beyond rudimentary bid comparisons and price-only decisions, demanding a rigorous assessment of both qualitative and quantitative criteria. The challenge lies not in acknowledging the importance of non-price factors, but in constructing a defensible, repeatable, and transparent system to weight them. A procurement event is an exercise in applied risk management. Every criterion included in an evaluation model represents a mitigation strategy against a specific operational, financial, or reputational risk.

Treating the weighting process as a mere administrative step introduces systemic vulnerabilities. Instead, the allocation of weights must be viewed as the primary calibration of a complex system designed to select a strategic partner, one whose capabilities and stability will integrate into your own operational framework. The integrity of the entire procurement outcome hinges on the intellectual rigor applied at this stage.

The core objective is to translate subjective business requirements into an objective, quantitative measurement framework. This translation is where value is either created or destroyed. A poorly calibrated model, one that over-emphasizes cost or misinterprets the relative importance of technical merit and vendor stability, will invariably select a suboptimal partner. The consequences manifest as cost overruns, service failures, and reputational damage.

The lowest bid often presents the highest total cost of ownership when viewed through the lens of operational reality. Data indicates that a 15% variance in price can alter the outcome of one in three RFPs, revealing how sensitive the process is to financial pressures. This sensitivity underscores the need for a robust system that insulates the evaluation from such biases.

> A properly weighted evaluation system functions as a predictive model, forecasting the future performance and stability of a potential partner.

The phenomenon of “lower-bid bias” is a documented cognitive trap where evaluators, when aware of pricing, systematically favor the lowest bidder, irrespective of qualitative demerits. This introduces a significant distortion field into the evaluation. A proven method to counteract this is a two-stage evaluation. In the first stage, the technical and qualitative merits of the proposals are assessed in complete isolation from any financial data.

Only after these scores are finalized is the price revealed and factored into the final calculation. This procedural firewall ensures that the intrinsic value of a solution is assessed on its own terms, preventing the gravitational pull of a low price from warping the perception of quality.

The weighting itself is a statement of strategic priority. For projects where technical complexity and innovation are paramount, such as the development of a new software platform, the [non-price criteria](https://prime.greeks.live/area/non-price-criteria/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) should command a substantial portion of the [total score](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-effectiveness-of-an-rfq-toxicity-score-change-across-different-asset-classes-like-equities-versus-fixed-income/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), often exceeding 70%. Conversely, for the procurement of commoditized goods or services where differentiation is minimal, a higher weight on price is justifiable. Best practices often suggest a 20-30% weighting for price in standard procurements, providing a balanced approach.

The key is that this allocation must be a conscious, documented decision, not an arbitrary default. It must be directly traceable to the strategic objectives of the project and the specific risks the organization seeks to mitigate.

![An intricate, transparent digital asset derivatives engine visualizes market microstructure and liquidity pool dynamics. Its precise components signify high-fidelity execution via FIX Protocol, facilitating RFQ protocols for block trade and multi-leg spread strategies within an institutional-grade Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-liquidity-ecosystem.jpg)

![A sophisticated proprietary system module featuring precision-engineered components, symbolizing an institutional-grade Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives. Its intricate design represents market microstructure analysis, RFQ protocol integration, and high-fidelity execution capabilities, optimizing liquidity aggregation and price discovery for block trades within a multi-leg spread environment](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-proprietary-architecture-driving-high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-via-rfq-protocols-and-optimized-market-microstructure-dynamics.jpg)

## Strategy

Developing a sound strategy for weighting non-price criteria requires moving from abstract principles to concrete, defensible methodologies. The goal is to build a system that is not only accurate in its predictive power but also transparent and fair to all participants. The choice of methodology is a critical strategic decision that dictates the flexibility, granularity, and defensibility of the entire evaluation process. Two prominent methodologies provide a structured approach ▴ the Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique (SMART) and the more sophisticated [Analytic Hierarchy Process](https://prime.greeks.live/area/analytic-hierarchy-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (AHP).

![Intersecting metallic structures symbolize RFQ protocol pathways for institutional digital asset derivatives. They represent high-fidelity execution of multi-leg spreads across diverse liquidity pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-framework-optimizing-multi-leg-spreads-and-liquidity-aggregation-for-best-execution.jpg)

## Foundational Weighting Methodologies

The selection of a weighting methodology is the first and most critical step in translating strategic objectives into a functional evaluation model. Each method offers a different balance of simplicity, precision, and resource intensity. The choice itself is a strategic act, reflecting the complexity of the procurement and the level of analytical rigor required by the organization.

![Abstract layers and metallic components depict institutional digital asset derivatives market microstructure. They symbolize multi-leg spread construction, robust FIX Protocol for high-fidelity execution, and private quotation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## The SMART Method a Direct Approach

The SMART method is a straightforward and widely used technique. It involves assigning points, typically out of 100, across a set of high-level criteria. For example, [Technical Solution](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-quantify-the-value-of-a-vendors-proposed-solution-in-an-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) might be assigned 40 points, Vendor Stability 30 points, and Project Management 30 points. Each vendor is then scored against these criteria, and the scores are tallied.

Its primary strength is its simplicity and ease of communication. However, this simplicity can also be a weakness, as it can obscure the nuances within each high-level criterion and may not provide the granular detail needed for highly complex procurements.

![Engineered components in beige, blue, and metallic tones form a complex, layered structure. This embodies the intricate market microstructure of institutional digital asset derivatives, illustrating a sophisticated RFQ protocol framework for optimizing price discovery, high-fidelity execution, and managing counterparty risk within multi-leg spreads on a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-stack-optimization.jpg)

## The Analytic Hierarchy Process a Systemic Calibration

For procurements demanding higher precision, the [Analytic Hierarchy](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-can-the-analytic-hierarchy-process-improve-rfp-objectivity/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) Process offers a more robust and systemic approach. AHP structures the decision problem into a hierarchy of goals, criteria, and sub-criteria. The process involves pairwise comparisons of criteria at each level of the hierarchy to establish their relative importance. For instance, an evaluator might be asked ▴ “Is ‘Technical Compliance’ more important than ‘Implementation Support’?” and if so, by how much (on a scale of 1 to 9).

This process is repeated for all pairs of criteria. The mathematical synthesis of these judgments results in a set of precise weights for each criterion and sub-criterion. The strength of AHP lies in its ability to handle complexity, reduce cognitive bias through structured comparisons, and generate highly defensible weightings. Its main drawback is the increased time and effort required from the evaluation team to complete the pairwise comparisons.

![Central, interlocked mechanical structures symbolize a sophisticated Crypto Derivatives OS driving institutional RFQ protocol. Surrounding blades represent diverse liquidity pools and multi-leg spread components](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-architecture-optimizing-high-fidelity-execution-across-diverse-liquidity-pools.jpg)

## A Comparative Analysis of Weighting Models

The decision to use a specific model depends on a careful analysis of the procurement’s unique context. A simple procurement for office supplies would not warrant the rigor of AHP, while a multi-year IT transformation project would be ill-served by an overly simplistic model.

| Methodology | Core Mechanism | Primary Advantage | Primary Disadvantage | Optimal Use Case |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Direct Point Allocation (SMART) | Assigns a portion of 100 points directly to each high-level criterion. | Simplicity, speed of implementation, and ease of understanding for all stakeholders. | Can be overly simplistic, may lack granularity, and is susceptible to arbitrary weight assignments. | Low-to-medium complexity procurements where speed is a factor and criteria are clearly distinct. |
| Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) | Uses pairwise comparisons of criteria to derive weights mathematically. | High degree of precision, reduces bias, creates a highly defensible and auditable trail of logic. | Time-consuming for evaluators, requires training, and can be complex to explain to non-technical stakeholders. | High-value, high-risk, and complex procurements, such as major infrastructure or enterprise software. |

> The most effective strategy is one where the chosen methodology’s complexity is commensurate with the procurement’s risk and strategic importance.

![A precision-engineered component, like an RFQ protocol engine, displays a reflective blade and numerical data. It symbolizes high-fidelity execution within market microstructure, driving price discovery, capital efficiency, and algorithmic trading for institutional Digital Asset Derivatives on a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-execution-engine-core-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-price-discovery.jpg)

## Isolating Price from the Quality Assessment

A critical strategic element, regardless of the weighting methodology chosen, is the procedural separation of the technical and financial evaluations. This two-stage process is a firewall against cognitive bias. The evaluation committee must first score all non-price criteria for all bidders without any knowledge of the submitted prices. Once the qualitative scores are finalized and locked, the financial proposals are opened and scored.

This sequence ensures that the assessment of a solution’s technical merit, vendor stability, and implementation plan is performed on its own terms. It prevents the “low-bid bias” from subconsciously influencing evaluators to be more lenient on a lower-priced, lower-quality solution or overly critical of a higher-priced, superior one. This procedural discipline is a cornerstone of a fair and effective evaluation strategy, ensuring that the final decision is a true reflection of value, not just a reaction to price.

![Angular translucent teal structures intersect on a smooth base, reflecting light against a deep blue sphere. This embodies RFQ Protocol architecture, symbolizing High-Fidelity Execution for Digital Asset Derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/dynamic-rfq-protocol-architecture-optimizing-digital-asset-derivative-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

![A sophisticated institutional digital asset derivatives platform unveils its core market microstructure. Intricate circuitry powers a central blue spherical RFQ protocol engine on a polished circular surface](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-unveiling-rfq-protocol-engine-market-microstructure-for-optimal-price-discovery-and-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Execution

The execution phase translates the selected strategy into a precise, operational, and data-driven evaluation protocol. This is where theoretical weights become applied scores and a final, defensible decision is forged. The integrity of the execution rests on a meticulously designed [scoring matrix](https://prime.greeks.live/area/scoring-matrix/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), a well-defined evaluation process, and the disciplined analysis of the resulting data. This is not an administrative task; it is the systematic implementation of a decision-making engine.

![A stylized rendering illustrates a robust RFQ protocol within an institutional market microstructure, depicting high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives. A transparent mechanism channels a precise order, symbolizing efficient price discovery and atomic settlement for block trades via a prime brokerage system](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-execution-digital-asset-derivatives-options-high-fidelity-trading.jpg)

## Constructing the Evaluation Matrix

The foundational tool for execution is the evaluation matrix. This document breaks down the high-level criteria defined in the strategy phase into granular, measurable sub-criteria. Each sub-criterion must be explicit, unambiguous, and directly linked to a specific requirement in the RFP. Vague terms like “good user interface” are replaced with specific, verifiable metrics such as “compliance with WCAG 2.1 AA accessibility standards” or “task completion rate for core workflows under 30 seconds.”

The process of building the matrix follows a clear sequence:

- **Decomposition** ▴ Break down each primary criterion (e.g. Technical Solution) into a set of comprehensive sub-criteria (e.g. System Architecture, Scalability, Security Protocols, Integration Capabilities). 

- **Weight Allocation** ▴ Distribute the total weight of the primary criterion among its sub-criteria. If Technical Solution is worth 40%, the sub-criteria might be weighted as follows ▴ System Architecture (10%), Scalability (10%), Security Protocols (15%), and Integration Capabilities (5%). 

- **Scoring Scale Definition** ▴ Define a clear, objective scoring scale for each sub-criterion. A 1-5 scale is common, where each point value is explicitly defined. For example:

<li>**1** ▴ Requirement not met.

- **3** ▴ Requirement is met with the proposed solution.

- **5** ▴ Requirement is exceeded; solution provides additional value or innovation.

</li>

This level of detail removes subjectivity and ensures that all evaluators are applying the same standards consistently. The resulting matrix is a detailed blueprint for the evaluation.

![Precision instruments, resembling calibration tools, intersect over a central geared mechanism. This metaphor illustrates the intricate market microstructure and price discovery for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-engine-microstructure-analytics.jpg)

## Sample Granular Scoring Matrix

The following table illustrates a section of a detailed scoring matrix for a hypothetical enterprise software procurement.

| Primary Criterion (Weight) | Sub-Criterion (Weight) | Metric/Question | Max Score | Weight | Max Weighted Score |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor Viability (30%) | Financial Stability (10%) | Does the vendor demonstrate positive cash flow and profitability over the last 3 fiscal years? | 5 | 0.10 | 0.50 |

![Precisely aligned forms depict an institutional trading system's RFQ protocol interface. Circular elements symbolize market data feeds and price discovery for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-interface-optimization.jpg)

## The Two-Stage Evaluation Protocol

With the matrix in place, the evaluation itself must be conducted with procedural discipline. The two-stage protocol is paramount.

- **Stage One The Qualitative Assessment** ▴ The evaluation committee convenes to score the non-price criteria exclusively. Each evaluator scores each proposal independently using the defined matrix. Following independent scoring, the committee meets for a consensus meeting. During this meeting, evaluators discuss their scores for each sub-criterion, presenting evidence from the proposals to justify their ratings. The goal is to arrive at a single, consensus score for each item. This process mitigates the impact of individual biases and ensures the final qualitative score is a product of collective, evidence-based judgment. 

- **Stage Two The Financial Assessment** ▴ Only after the consensus non-price scores are finalized and formally recorded are the price proposals opened. The [price score](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-effectiveness-of-an-rfq-toxicity-score-change-across-different-asset-classes-like-equities-versus-fixed-income/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is typically calculated using a formula that normalizes the bids. A common method is to award the lowest bidder the maximum price score, with other bidders receiving a score that is inversely proportional to their price. For example ▴ (Lowest Price / Bidder’s Price) Maximum Price Score. 

> A disciplined, two-stage evaluation protocol is the most effective operational control against the persistent threat of price-based bias.

![A sleek, spherical white and blue module featuring a central black aperture and teal lens, representing the core Intelligence Layer for Institutional Trading in Digital Asset Derivatives. It visualizes High-Fidelity Execution within an RFQ protocol, enabling precise Price Discovery and optimizing the Principal's Operational Framework for Crypto Derivatives OS](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-lens-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution.jpg)

## Synthesizing the Final Score

The final step is the mathematical synthesis of the qualitative and quantitative scores. The total score for each bidder is the sum of their weighted non-price score and their weighted price score. The bidder with the highest total score is identified as the one offering the best overall value, based on the priorities encoded in the weighting scheme.

![A symmetrical, intricate digital asset derivatives execution engine. Its metallic and translucent elements visualize a robust RFQ protocol facilitating multi-leg spread execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-best-execution.jpg)

## Hypothetical Vendor Score Synthesis

This table demonstrates the final calculation, bringing together the scores from both evaluation stages.

| Vendor | Normalized Non-Price Score (out of 70) | Normalized Price Score (out of 30) | Total Score (out of 100) | Rank |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor A | 65.5 | 21.0 | 86.5 | 2 |
| Vendor B | 58.0 | 30.0 (Lowest Bid) | 88.0 | 1 |
| Vendor C | 68.0 (Highest Quality) | 15.0 (Highest Bid) | 83.0 | 3 |

In this scenario, Vendor B wins. While Vendor C had the superior technical solution, its high price reduced its overall score. Vendor B offered a compelling combination of a strong, albeit not the strongest, technical proposal and the most competitive price.

This outcome is a direct, logical result of the pre-defined weighting system. The process provides a clear, auditable, and data-driven justification for the selection, protecting the organization from challenges and ensuring that the final decision is aligned with its stated strategic objectives.

![A precision metallic mechanism with radiating blades and blue accents, representing an institutional-grade Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives. It signifies high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols, leveraging dark liquidity and smart order routing within market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-engine.jpg)

## References

- Bergman, M. A. & Lundberg, S. (2013). Tender evaluation and the properties of scoring rules. _European Journal of Operational Research, 225_(3), 596-605.

- Hromiak, O. (2019). _Effect of Non-Price Criteria on Tender Outcomes_. Kyiv School of Economics.

- Mak, J. (2011). _Increased Transparency in Bases of Selection and Award Decisions_. RFP Solutions.

- State of Victoria, Department of Treasury and Finance. (2018). _Tender and contract management_.

- Ghosh, S. & Mukhopadhyay, S. (2017). Tender Evaluation Avoiding Weights. _International Journal of Management, Technology, and Social Sciences (IJMTS), 2_(2), 1-13.

- Tasmanian Government. (2002). _Tender Evaluation using Weighted Criteria_. Department of Treasury and Finance.

- Cook, W. D. & Zhu, J. (2008). _Modeling performance measurement ▴ Applications and implementation issues in DEA_. Springer.

- Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. _International journal of services sciences, 1_(1), 83-98.

![Robust institutional Prime RFQ core connects to a precise RFQ protocol engine. Multi-leg spread execution blades propel a digital asset derivative target, optimizing price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-proto-insti-digital-asset-derivs-hi-fi-exec-capital-effi-risk-mgmt.jpg)

## Reflection

![A modular component, resembling an RFQ gateway, with multiple connection points, intersects a high-fidelity execution pathway. This pathway extends towards a deep, optimized liquidity pool, illustrating robust market microstructure for institutional digital asset derivatives trading and atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/rfq-protocol-layer-connecting-institutional-digital-asset-liquidity-pools.jpg)

## Calibrating the Decision Engine

The construction of an RFP evaluation model is ultimately an exercise in organizational self-awareness. The weights assigned, the criteria selected, and the rigor of the process all reflect a deeper operational philosophy. It forces a clear articulation of what constitutes value and which risks are deemed unacceptable. Viewing this process through a systemic lens reveals that you are not merely selecting a vendor; you are designing and calibrating a critical input channel into your own organization.

The selected partner becomes a component in your operational architecture. The question then moves beyond the immediate procurement. How does the rigor applied to this external selection process compare to the systems your organization uses for internal resource allocation and strategic decision-making? A truly robust operational framework applies this same level of disciplined, data-driven analysis to its own most critical choices, ensuring that both internal and external systems are calibrated for maximum strategic effect.

![A glowing blue module with a metallic core and extending probe is set into a pristine white surface. This symbolizes an active institutional RFQ protocol, enabling precise price discovery and high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocol-driving-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-high-fidelity-execution-precise-price-discovery-for-block-trades-and-capital-efficiency.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A high-fidelity institutional digital asset derivatives execution platform. A central conical hub signifies precise price discovery and aggregated inquiry for RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-1.jpg)

## Rfp Evaluation

Meaning ▴ RFP Evaluation denotes the structured, systematic process undertaken by an institutional entity to assess and score vendor proposals submitted in response to a Request for Proposal, specifically for technology and services pertaining to institutional digital asset derivatives. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/non-price-criteria/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract geometric planes delineate distinct institutional digital asset derivatives liquidity pools. Stark contrast signifies market microstructure shift via advanced RFQ protocols, ensuring high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-execution-protocol-integrating-rfq-liquidity-and-advanced-market-microstructure.jpg)

## Non-Price Criteria

Meaning ▴ Non-Price Criteria define the attributes beyond the quoted price that govern optimal execution outcomes in institutional digital asset derivatives trading. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-effectiveness-of-an-rfq-toxicity-score-change-across-different-asset-classes-like-equities-versus-fixed-income/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract geometric forms portray a dark circular digital asset derivative or liquidity pool on a light plane. Sharp lines and a teal surface with a triangular shadow symbolize market microstructure, RFQ protocol execution, and algorithmic trading precision for institutional grade block trades and high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-block-execution-microstructure.jpg)

## Total Score

An RFQ toxicity score's efficacy shifts from gauging market impact in equities to pricing information asymmetry in opaque fixed income markets. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/analytic-hierarchy-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sophisticated, multi-component system propels a sleek, teal-colored digital asset derivative trade. The complex internal structure represents a proprietary RFQ protocol engine with liquidity aggregation and price discovery mechanisms](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principals-high-fidelity-rfq-engine-for-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

## Analytic Hierarchy Process

Meaning ▴ The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) constitutes a structured methodology for organizing and analyzing complex decision problems, particularly those involving multiple, often conflicting, criteria and subjective judgments. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-quantify-the-value-of-a-vendors-proposed-solution-in-an-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A meticulously engineered mechanism showcases a blue and grey striped block, representing a structured digital asset derivative, precisely engaged by a metallic tool. This setup illustrates high-fidelity execution within a controlled RFQ environment, optimizing block trade settlement and managing counterparty risk through robust market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution.jpg)

## Technical Solution

Quantifying vendor value is an architectural process of translating proposal claims into a weighted, data-driven decision matrix. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-can-the-analytic-hierarchy-process-improve-rfp-objectivity/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sophisticated digital asset derivatives trading mechanism features a central processing hub with luminous blue accents, symbolizing an intelligence layer driving high fidelity execution. Transparent circular elements represent dynamic liquidity pools and a complex volatility surface, revealing market microstructure and atomic settlement via an advanced RFQ protocol](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution-framework-optimizing-market-microstructure-price-discovery-intelligence-layer.jpg)

## Analytic Hierarchy

AHP enhances RFP objectivity by replacing subjective scoring with a structured, mathematical protocol for decomposing decisions and quantifying priorities. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/scoring-matrix/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Central polished disc, with contrasting segments, represents Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives Prime RFQ core. A textured rod signifies RFQ Protocol High-Fidelity Execution and Low Latency Market Microstructure data flow to the Quantitative Analysis Engine for Price Discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-core-system-high-fidelity.jpg)

## Scoring Matrix

Meaning ▴ A scoring matrix is a computational construct assigning quantitative values to inputs within automated decision frameworks. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-effectiveness-of-an-rfq-toxicity-score-change-across-different-asset-classes-like-equities-versus-fixed-income/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Sleek metallic panels expose a circuit board, its glowing blue-green traces symbolizing dynamic market microstructure and intelligence layer data flow. A silver stylus embodies a Principal's precise interaction with a Crypto Derivatives OS, enabling high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-microstructure-os.jpg)

## Price Score

An RFQ toxicity score's efficacy shifts from gauging market impact in equities to pricing information asymmetry in opaque fixed income markets. </a>

**Tags:** [Scoring Matrix](https://options.greeks.live/area/scoring-matrix/), [Non-Price Criteria](https://options.greeks.live/area/non-price-criteria/), [Analytic Hierarchy Process](https://options.greeks.live/area/analytic-hierarchy-process/), [Vendor Selection](https://options.greeks.live/area/vendor-selection/), [RFP Scoring Matrix](https://options.greeks.live/area/rfp-scoring-matrix/), [Multi-Criteria Decision Making](https://options.greeks.live/area/multi-criteria-decision-making/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [What Are the Risks of Using an Improperly Weighted Scoring Model in an Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-risks-of-using-an-improperly-weighted-scoring-model-in-an-rfp/)
![A detailed view of an institutional-grade Digital Asset Derivatives trading interface, featuring a central liquidity pool visualization through a clear, tinted disc. Subtle market microstructure elements are visible, suggesting real-time price discovery and order book dynamics. This represents a Prime RFQ component for high-fidelity execution of RFQ protocols in multi-leg spread strategies.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-system-microstructure-display.jpg)

An improperly weighted RFP model is a system designed to fail, guaranteeing the selection of a suboptimal solution by misaligning process with purpose.

- 
### [How Can Weighted Scoring in an Rfp Mitigate Procurement Risks?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-weighted-scoring-in-an-rfp-mitigate-procurement-risks/)
![A precision-engineered metallic institutional trading platform, bisected by an execution pathway, features a central blue RFQ protocol engine. This Crypto Derivatives OS core facilitates high-fidelity execution, optimal price discovery, and multi-leg spread trading, reflecting advanced market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-core-facilitating-rfq-protocol-driven-optimal-price-discovery-and-multi-leg-spread-trading-for-capital-efficiency.jpg)

Weighted scoring in an RFP mitigates procurement risks by providing a structured, data-driven framework for vendor evaluation that prioritizes strategic objectives over pure cost.

- 
### [How Can an Organization Effectively Weight RFP Evaluation Criteria to Reflect Its Strategic Priorities?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-effectively-weight-rfp-evaluation-criteria-to-reflect-its-strategic-priorities/)
![Central polished disc, with contrasting segments, represents Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives Prime RFQ core. A textured rod signifies RFQ Protocol High-Fidelity Execution and Low Latency Market Microstructure data flow to the Quantitative Analysis Engine for Price Discovery.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-core-system-high-fidelity.jpg)

Weighting RFP criteria is the systemic translation of strategic intent into a quantitative, defensible procurement decision framework.

- 
### [How Do You Define and Weight Non-Price Factors in a Value-Based Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-define-and-weight-non-price-factors-in-a-value-based-rfp/)
![A central toroidal structure and intricate core are bisected by two blades: one algorithmic with circuits, the other solid. This symbolizes an institutional digital asset derivatives platform, leveraging RFQ protocols for high-fidelity execution and price discovery. It optimizes market microstructure for capital efficiency, managing multi-leg spreads and latent liquidity within a Principal's operational framework.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-hub-integrating-algorithmic-intelligence-for-high-fidelity-price-discovery-and-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

A systematic process for translating strategic priorities into a quantitative model to select partners that offer the highest total value.

- 
### [How Does a Phased Rfp Approach Improve Vendor Selection Objectivity?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-phased-rfp-approach-improve-vendor-selection-objectivity/)
![Intersecting transparent and opaque geometric planes, symbolizing the intricate market microstructure of institutional digital asset derivatives. Visualizes high-fidelity execution and price discovery via RFQ protocols, demonstrating multi-leg spread strategies and dark liquidity for capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-market-microstructure-architecture.jpg)

A phased RFP is a decision-making architecture that systematically de-risks vendor selection through sequential, data-driven evaluation gates.

- 
### [How Should an Organization Determine the Appropriate Weights for Different RFP Criteria?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-should-an-organization-determine-the-appropriate-weights-for-different-rfp-criteria/)
![Two distinct, interlocking institutional-grade system modules, one teal, one beige, symbolize integrated Crypto Derivatives OS components. The beige module features a price discovery lens, while the teal represents high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement, embodying capital efficiency within RFQ protocols for multi-leg spread strategies.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-modules.jpg)

Determining RFP criteria weights is a strategic process of encoding business priorities into a quantitative model to enable objective, data-driven vendor selection.

- 
### [In What Ways Can a Weighted Scoring Matrix Improve the Objectivity of an Rfp Evaluation?](https://options.greeks.live/question/in-what-ways-can-a-weighted-scoring-matrix-improve-the-objectivity-of-an-rfp-evaluation/)
![A transparent blue sphere, symbolizing precise Price Discovery and Implied Volatility, is central to a layered Principal's Operational Framework. This structure facilitates High-Fidelity Execution and RFQ Protocol processing across diverse Aggregated Liquidity Pools, revealing the intricate Market Microstructure of Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system-microstructure-principal-framework.jpg)

A weighted scoring matrix enhances RFP objectivity by translating strategic priorities into a quantitative, auditable evaluation framework.

- 
### [What Is the Role of Cross-Functional Teams in Defining and Weighting RFP Evaluation Criteria Effectively?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-role-of-cross-functional-teams-in-defining-and-weighting-rfp-evaluation-criteria-effectively/)
![Intersecting sleek components of a Crypto Derivatives OS symbolize RFQ Protocol for Institutional Grade Digital Asset Derivatives. Luminous internal segments represent dynamic Liquidity Pool management and Market Microstructure insights, facilitating High-Fidelity Execution for Block Trade strategies within a Prime Brokerage framework.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-engine.jpg)

A cross-functional team transforms RFP evaluation into a system for embedding strategic priorities into a quantifiable decision model.

- 
### [What Are the Key Differences in Evaluation Criteria between an Rfp and a Hybrid Procurement Model?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-in-evaluation-criteria-between-an-rfp-and-a-hybrid-procurement-model/)
![Interlocking transparent and opaque geometric planes on a dark surface. This abstract form visually articulates the intricate Market Microstructure of Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives, embodying High-Fidelity Execution through advanced RFQ protocols. It symbolizes Aggregated Inquiry, optimal Liquidity Pool access, and Atomic Settlement within a Principal OS.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/geometric-abstraction-of-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-market-microstructure-driving-high-fidelity-execution-via-principal-rfq-protocols-and-optimal-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

RFP evaluation prioritizes price and compliance, while hybrid models assess strategic fit and long-term value.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "How Do You Effectively Weight Non-Price Criteria in an RFP Evaluation?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-effectively-weight-non-price-criteria-in-an-rfp-evaluation/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-effectively-weight-non-price-criteria-in-an-rfp-evaluation/"
    },
    "headline": "How Do You Effectively Weight Non-Price Criteria in an RFP Evaluation? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "A defensible RFP evaluation weights non-price criteria by translating strategic risks into a quantitative scoring protocol. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-effectively-weight-non-price-criteria-in-an-rfp-evaluation/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-07T09:22:55+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-08-07T09:22:56+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-lens-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution.jpg",
        "caption": "This sophisticated module, with its precise optical lens and distinctive blue accent, embodies the advanced capabilities of an Institutional Grade Crypto Derivatives OS. It symbolizes the granular focus on RFQ protocol execution, ensuring High-Fidelity Execution and optimal Price Discovery for Digital Asset Derivatives, including Bitcoin Options and Ethereum Futures. The design reflects a system specialized in navigating complex Market Microstructure, managing Latency and Slippage, and leveraging Aggregated Inquiry for Best Execution within a secure Prime RFQ environment, mitigating Counterparty Risk effectively."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Analytic Hierarchy Process",
        "Bid Evaluation",
        "Multi-Criteria Decision Making",
        "Non-Price Criteria",
        "Procurement Strategy",
        "RFP Evaluation",
        "RFP Scoring Matrix",
        "Scoring Matrix",
        "Strategic Sourcing",
        "Supplier Risk Management",
        "Vendor Selection",
        "Weighted Scoring"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-effectively-weight-non-price-criteria-in-an-rfp-evaluation/
