# How Do You Ensure Consistency across a Large, Diverse Rfp Evaluation Team? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-09
**Categories:** Question

---

![A precision optical system with a reflective lens embodies the Prime RFQ intelligence layer. Gray and green planes represent divergent RFQ protocols or multi-leg spread strategies for institutional digital asset derivatives, enabling high-fidelity execution and optimal price discovery within complex market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-intelligent-core-driving-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution-across-diverse-liquidity-pools-for-optimal-price-discovery.jpg)

![A precisely engineered system features layered grey and beige plates, representing distinct liquidity pools or market segments, connected by a central dark blue RFQ protocol hub. Transparent teal bars, symbolizing multi-leg options spreads or algorithmic trading pathways, intersect through this core, facilitating price discovery and high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives via an institutional-grade Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-facilitating-high-fidelity-multi-leg-options-spread-execution-best-price-discovery-and-latent-liquidity-access-for-prime-brokerage.jpg)

## Concept

The evaluation of a Request for Proposal (RFP) by a large, diverse team presents a complex operational challenge. The core objective is to distill a multitude of individual judgments into a single, defensible, and unified organizational decision. This process transcends a simple comparison of vendor submissions; it is a structured exercise in collective intelligence. The presence of evaluators from different departments ▴ engineering, finance, marketing, operations ▴ introduces a rich collection of perspectives.

Each member brings a distinct lens, shaped by their specific expertise and departmental priorities. This diversity is a powerful asset for a comprehensive assessment, yet it simultaneously creates the conditions for inconsistency, subjectivity, and potential bias. The fundamental task is to build a system that harnesses the strength of this diversity while mitigating its inherent risks.

A successful evaluation system functions like a sophisticated measurement instrument. Its purpose is to accurately gauge how well each proposal aligns with a predefined set of organizational goals. For this instrument to be effective, it must be calibrated. Every evaluator, regardless of their background, must interpret the [evaluation criteria](https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-criteria/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) in the same way and apply scoring standards with uniformity.

Without this calibration, the final scores become a distorted reflection of the proposals’ true merits, influenced more by the variance in the evaluators’ judgments than by the substantive differences between the vendors. The challenge is one of system design ▴ creating a framework that guides individual evaluators toward a common understanding and a shared standard of assessment. This ensures the final decision is a product of disciplined analysis rather than a collage of disparate, uncoordinated opinions.

The system must be designed to be both fair and transparent, not only for the vendors submitting proposals but also for the internal stakeholders who will be impacted by the decision. A well-structured process provides a clear, documented rationale for the selection, insulating the organization from potential challenges and reinforcing the integrity of the procurement function. It establishes a level playing field where all proposals are assessed against the same benchmarks, using the same methodology.

This structured approach transforms the evaluation from a potentially contentious debate into a logical, evidence-based procedure. The ultimate goal is to create an operational environment where the best proposal is selected through a process that is as rigorous, consistent, and objective as the analysis that went into creating it.

![A central engineered mechanism, resembling a Prime RFQ hub, anchors four precision arms. This symbolizes multi-leg spread execution and liquidity pool aggregation for RFQ protocols, enabling high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-framework-enabling-multi-leg-spread-strategies-for-optimized-liquidity.jpg)

![Visualizing institutional digital asset derivatives market microstructure. A central RFQ protocol engine facilitates high-fidelity execution across diverse liquidity pools, enabling precise price discovery for multi-leg spreads](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-across-multi-asset-liquidity.jpg)

## Strategy

![A scratched blue sphere, representing market microstructure and liquidity pool for digital asset derivatives, encases a smooth teal sphere, symbolizing a private quotation via RFQ protocol. An institutional-grade structure suggests a Prime RFQ facilitating high-fidelity execution and managing counterparty risk](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-rfq-protocols-optimizing-digital-asset-derivative-execution-microstructure.jpg)

## A Framework for Deliberate Evaluation

To ensure consistency across a diverse [RFP evaluation](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) team, a deliberate and structured strategic framework is required. This framework serves as the operational blueprint for the entire [evaluation process](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-do-regulatory-frameworks-like-mifid-ii-influence-the-process-for-rfq-counterparty-evaluation-and-best-execution/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), guiding the team from the initial review of proposals to the final recommendation. The first step in this process is the development of a comprehensive evaluation plan. This plan, created before the RFP is even issued, outlines the entire methodology for assessment.

It details the evaluation criteria, the scoring system, the roles and responsibilities of each team member, the timeline for the evaluation, and the protocols for communication and conflict resolution. By establishing these elements in advance, the organization sets clear expectations and provides a common roadmap for all evaluators to follow.

A central component of this strategy is the creation of a detailed [scoring rubric](https://prime.greeks.live/area/scoring-rubric/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). This rubric is more than just a list of criteria; it is a granular guide that defines what each criterion means and what different levels of performance look like. For each evaluation factor, the rubric should provide clear, descriptive anchors for each point on the scoring scale.

For instance, instead of simply stating “Technical Solution” as a criterion, the rubric would break it down into sub-criteria such as “System Architecture,” “Integration Capabilities,” and “Scalability.” For each of these, it would describe what constitutes an “Excellent,” “Good,” “Fair,” or “Poor” response. This level of detail minimizes ambiguity and forces evaluators to ground [their scores](https://prime.greeks.live/question/why-do-dependency-based-anomaly-scores-provide-a-stronger-signal-for-financial-fraud-than-proximity-based-scores/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) in specific, observable evidence from the proposals.

> A systematic scoring approach reduces guesswork and aligns proposal reviews with defined objectives.

![Sleek, interconnected metallic components with glowing blue accents depict a sophisticated institutional trading platform. A central element and button signify high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system-microstructure.jpg)

## The Human Element Calibration and Communication

Technology and structured rubrics provide the tools for consistency, but the human element remains the most critical variable to manage. A key strategic initiative is the mandatory evaluator training and calibration session, held after the evaluation team is formed but before they begin scoring proposals. This session serves several purposes:

- **Shared Understanding** ▴ The procurement lead or facilitator walks the team through the RFP’s goals, the evaluation plan, and the scoring rubric in detail. This ensures every evaluator understands the project’s context and the specific meaning of each evaluation criterion. 

- **Bias Awareness** ▴ The session should include a discussion on common unconscious biases that can affect evaluations, such as the “halo effect” (where a positive impression in one area influences scores in others) or “confirmation bias” (favoring information that confirms existing beliefs).

- **Calibration Exercise** ▴ The team collectively scores a sample proposal (or a section of one). They then discuss their scores, justifying their reasoning based on the rubric. This process helps to surface differences in interpretation and allows the team to converge on a shared understanding of the scoring standards before the live evaluation begins. 

Ongoing communication throughout the evaluation process is equally important. A centralized platform for questions and clarifications should be established, with the procurement lead acting as the single point of contact. This prevents individual evaluators from having side conversations with vendors or making assumptions about ambiguous points in a proposal.

Regular check-in meetings can also be held to discuss progress, address any emerging issues, and ensure the team remains aligned and on schedule. This structured approach to communication maintains the integrity of the process and reinforces the principle of collective, [consistent evaluation](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-effectively-train-an-rfp-evaluation-committee-to-ensure-consistent-scoring/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite).

![A sharp, dark, precision-engineered element, indicative of a targeted RFQ protocol for institutional digital asset derivatives, traverses a secure liquidity aggregation conduit. This interaction occurs within a robust market microstructure platform, symbolizing high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement under a Principal's operational framework for best execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-grade-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine.jpg)

## Comparative Approaches to Evaluator Readiness

Organizations can adopt various methods to prepare their evaluation teams. The choice of method often depends on the complexity of the RFP and the experience level of the evaluators. The following table compares different approaches to ensuring evaluator readiness and consistency.

| Readiness Approach | Description | Advantages | Disadvantages |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Independent Review | Evaluators are given the RFP, proposals, and scoring rubric and are expected to complete their scoring independently with minimal interaction. | Fastest method; reduces risk of groupthink. | Highest risk of inconsistent scoring; relies heavily on the clarity of the rubric. |
| Facilitated Kick-off Meeting | A single meeting is held before evaluation begins to review the process, rubric, and answer initial questions. | Ensures a baseline understanding of the process; provides an opportunity for clarification. | Does not include a practical calibration exercise; interpretations can still diverge during scoring. |
| Full Calibration Session | Includes a kick-off meeting plus a hands-on exercise where the team scores a sample proposal and discusses their ratings to align on standards. | Significantly improves inter-rater reliability; builds team cohesion and a shared understanding. | Requires more time upfront; can be challenging to schedule with a large team. |
| Phased Evaluation with Consensus Meetings | Evaluators score proposals independently in phases. After each phase, the team meets to discuss scores for that section, resolve major discrepancies, and build consensus. | Provides multiple checkpoints for consistency; allows for course correction during the process. | Most time-consuming method; can introduce groupthink if not managed carefully. |

![A complex, layered mechanical system featuring interconnected discs and a central glowing core. This visualizes an institutional Digital Asset Derivatives Prime RFQ, facilitating RFQ protocols for price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-crypto-derivatives-prime-os-market-microstructure.jpg)

![Intersecting abstract geometric planes depict institutional grade RFQ protocols and market microstructure. Speckled surfaces reflect complex order book dynamics and implied volatility, while smooth planes represent high-fidelity execution channels and private quotation systems for digital asset derivatives within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-rfq-protocols-digital-asset-microstructure-execution.jpg)

## Execution

![Translucent rods, beige, teal, and blue, intersect on a dark surface, symbolizing multi-leg spread execution for digital asset derivatives. Nodes represent atomic settlement points within a Principal's operational framework, visualizing RFQ protocol aggregation, cross-asset liquidity streams, and optimized market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-aggregation-and-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## The Operational Playbook for Consistent Evaluation

Executing a consistent RFP evaluation requires a disciplined, step-by-step process. This playbook breaks down the execution into distinct phases, ensuring that every action is deliberate and contributes to the final, unified decision. The process begins long before the first proposal is opened and continues until the final contract is awarded.

- 
**Phase 1 ▴ Foundation Setting**

<li>**Assemble the Team** ▴ Select a cross-functional team of evaluators. Ensure they have the requisite expertise and are free from any conflicts of interest. Confirm their availability for the entire evaluation period to maintain consistency. 

- **Appoint a Facilitator** ▴ Designate a procurement professional or project manager as the evaluation facilitator. This individual is not a voting evaluator but is responsible for managing the process, enforcing the rules, and serving as the central point of communication. 

- **Develop the Scoring Rubric** ▴ In collaboration with key stakeholders, create a detailed scoring rubric. Assign weights to each criterion based on its importance to the project’s success. The rubric must be finalized before the RFP is released.

</li>
- 
**Phase 2 ▴ Evaluator Onboarding and Calibration**

<li>**Conduct the Kick-off Meeting** ▴ Schedule a mandatory meeting for all evaluators. The facilitator will review the project background, RFP objectives, evaluation timeline, and the rules of engagement.

- **Deep Dive into the Rubric** ▴ Go through the scoring rubric line by line. Use concrete examples to illustrate the difference between scoring levels (e.g. a “5-Excellent” versus a “4-Good”).

- **Perform the Calibration Exercise** ▴ Have the team score a sample proposal section. The facilitator then leads a discussion on the scores, focusing on areas of wide divergence. The goal is to guide the team to a consensus on how to apply the rubric, effectively standardizing their judgment.

</li>
- 
**Phase 3 ▴ Independent Evaluation**

<li>**Distribute Materials** ▴ Provide each evaluator with the proposals and their individual scoring sheets.

- **Score Independently** ▴ Instruct evaluators to conduct their assessments without consulting one another. This initial independent review ensures that each evaluator’s unique perspective is captured without being influenced by others. 

- **Document Everything** ▴ Require evaluators to provide a written justification for every score they assign. This documentation is critical for later discussions and for the procurement record.

</li>
- 
**Phase 4 ▴ Consensus and Finalization**

<li>**Facilitator’s Initial Analysis** ▴ The facilitator collects all scoring sheets and compiles the results. They analyze the data to identify trends, averages, and, most importantly, areas of significant scoring variance between evaluators.

- **Conduct the [Consensus Meeting](https://prime.greeks.live/area/consensus-meeting/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)** ▴ The facilitator leads a meeting to discuss the results. The discussion should focus on the criteria with the highest variance. Evaluators are asked to explain the rationale for their scores, referencing their documented justifications.

- **Score Adjustment and Finalization** ▴ Based on the discussion, evaluators are given the opportunity to revise their scores. This is not about forcing everyone to agree on a single number, but about ensuring that any remaining differences are based on legitimate differences in professional judgment, not on a misunderstanding of the criteria. The final, adjusted scores are then compiled to determine the winning proposal.

</li>

![A vertically stacked assembly of diverse metallic and polymer components, resembling a modular lens system, visually represents the layered architecture of institutional digital asset derivatives. Each distinct ring signifies a critical market microstructure element, from RFQ protocol layers to aggregated liquidity pools, ensuring high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency within a Prime RFQ framework](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-execution-stack.jpg)

## Quantitative Modeling and Data Analysis

A quantitative approach to analyzing evaluator scores is essential for identifying inconsistencies and ensuring a fair outcome. The facilitator should use statistical tools to move beyond simple averages and gain deeper insights into the evaluation data. This adds a layer of objectivity to the process and helps in pinpointing specific areas that require further discussion.

> Modern solutions streamline the proposal assessment process. Tools that incorporate data analytics and document integration. help keep information organized and promote consistency across submissions.

Consider the following hypothetical scoring data for a critical criterion ▴ “Technical Solution,” weighted at 30%.

| Proposal | Evaluator 1 (Engineering) | Evaluator 2 (Finance) | Evaluator 3 (Operations) | Evaluator 4 (IT Security) | Average Score | Standard Deviation |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor A | 95 | 88 | 92 | 94 | 92.25 | 2.99 |
| Vendor B | 75 | 90 | 85 | 78 | 82.00 | 6.78 |
| Vendor C | 82 | 84 | 83 | 81 | 82.50 | 1.29 |

In this analysis, several points become clear:

- **Vendor A** has a high [average score](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-counterparty-performance-score-differ-from-a-traditional-credit-score/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) and a relatively low [standard deviation](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-trade-offs-between-calendar-and-deviation-based-rebalancing/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), indicating strong agreement among the evaluators on the quality of their solution.

- **Vendor C** has a lower average score but a very low standard deviation, suggesting the evaluators are in close agreement that the solution is adequate but not exceptional.

- **Vendor B** presents the most significant issue. The average score is similar to Vendor C’s, but the standard deviation is very high (6.78). This indicates a substantial disagreement among the evaluators. The Engineer and IT Security expert rated the solution poorly (75 and 78), while the Finance and Operations evaluators rated it highly (90 and 85). This is a red flag that requires immediate attention in the consensus meeting. The facilitator would use this data to focus the conversation, asking Evaluator 2 why they scored the solution so highly from a financial perspective, and asking Evaluator 1 to detail the technical deficiencies they identified. This data-driven approach turns a general discussion into a targeted, evidence-based analysis.

![Two sleek, pointed objects intersect centrally, forming an 'X' against a dual-tone black and teal background. This embodies the high-fidelity execution of institutional digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols, facilitating optimal price discovery and efficient cross-asset trading within a robust Prime RFQ, minimizing slippage and adverse selection](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-prime-os-microstructure.jpg)

## System Integration and Technological Support

To operationalize consistency at scale, organizations should leverage technology. Modern e-procurement and [RFP management software](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-management-software/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) can automate many of the steps in the playbook, enforce consistency, and provide valuable data analytics. These systems can serve as the technological backbone for the entire evaluation process.

Key functionalities to look for in an evaluation technology platform include:

- **Centralized Document Repository** ▴ A single, secure location for all RFPs, proposals, addenda, and scoring materials. This eliminates version control issues and ensures all evaluators are working from the same information. 

- **Integrated Scoring Rubrics** ▴ The platform should allow the facilitator to build the weighted scoring rubric directly into the system. Evaluators log in to score proposals within the platform, which automatically calculates weighted scores and prevents missed sections.

- **Automated Reporting and Analytics** ▴ The system can instantly generate the type of quantitative analysis shown above, flagging areas of high variance and providing dashboards that show evaluation progress in real-time. This saves the facilitator significant time and effort in manual data compilation.

- **Secure Communication Channels** ▴ A built-in, auditable messaging system allows evaluators to ask questions of the facilitator without violating rules against direct communication with vendors or other evaluators.

By integrating these technological tools, the organization creates a controlled environment for the evaluation. The system enforces the process, ensuring that no steps are skipped and that all data is captured in a consistent, structured format. This technological support allows the human evaluators to focus on the substantive task of assessment, confident that the underlying process is sound, fair, and defensible.

![Reflective planes and intersecting elements depict institutional digital asset derivatives market microstructure. A central Principal-driven RFQ protocol ensures high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement across diverse liquidity pools, optimizing multi-leg spread strategies on a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-precision.jpg)

## References

- “Proposal Evaluation Tips & Tricks ▴ How to Select the Best Vendor for the Job.” Procurement Excellence Network, n.d.

- “RFP Evaluation Guide 3 – How to evaluate and score supplier proposals.” Gatekeeper, 14 June 2019.

- “Mastering RFP Evaluation ▴ Essential Strategies for Effective Proposal Assessment.” Responsive, 6 March 2025.

- “The Ultimate RFP Management Guide ▴ Best Practices and Tips.” SalesTech Star, 17 April 2024.

- “How Do You Improve the RFP Process? Here Are 6 Opportunities.” Loopio, 27 October 2022.

![A sleek conduit, embodying an RFQ protocol and smart order routing, connects two distinct, semi-spherical liquidity pools. Its transparent core signifies an intelligence layer for algorithmic trading and high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives, ensuring atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-engine-bridging-diverse-liquidity-pools-via-high-fidelity-rfq-protocol-orchestration.jpg)

## Reflection

![Stacked, modular components represent a sophisticated Prime RFQ for institutional digital asset derivatives. Each layer signifies distinct liquidity pools or execution venues, with transparent covers revealing intricate market microstructure and algorithmic trading logic, facilitating high-fidelity execution and price discovery within a private quotation environment](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-framework.jpg)

## A System of Decisive Action

The establishment of a consistent evaluation process is an exercise in building organizational capacity. It transforms a potentially chaotic and subjective task into a structured system of decisive action. The framework, rubrics, and technologies are the components of this system, but its true output is not just a selected vendor; it is confidence. Confidence for the leadership that the decision is backed by a rigorous, evidence-based analysis.

Confidence for the project team that they are partnering with the best possible vendor to achieve their goals. And confidence for the market that the organization’s [procurement process](https://prime.greeks.live/area/procurement-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is fair, transparent, and professional.

Ultimately, the discipline of a consistent evaluation process becomes a strategic asset. It enables the organization to make better, faster, and more defensible procurement decisions. It mitigates risk, fosters internal alignment, and builds a reputation for integrity.

The question for any organization is not whether they can afford the time and resources to implement such a system, but whether they can afford the consequences of not having one. The true measure of the system is its ability to consistently translate diverse expertise into a single, optimal outcome.

![Abstract geometric forms in blue and beige represent institutional liquidity pools and market segments. A metallic rod signifies RFQ protocol connectivity for atomic settlement of digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-market-microstructure-1.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-criteria/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sophisticated apparatus, potentially a price discovery or volatility surface calibration tool. A blue needle with sphere and clamp symbolizes high-fidelity execution pathways and RFQ protocol integration within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocol-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

## Evaluation Criteria

Meaning ▴ Evaluation Criteria define the quantifiable metrics and qualitative standards against which the performance, compliance, or risk profile of a system, strategy, or transaction is rigorously assessed. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-do-regulatory-frameworks-like-mifid-ii-influence-the-process-for-rfq-counterparty-evaluation-and-best-execution/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![An abstract, angular sculpture with reflective blades from a polished central hub atop a dark base. This embodies institutional digital asset derivatives trading, illustrating market microstructure, multi-leg spread execution, and high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-price-discovery-system.jpg)

## Evaluation Process

MiFID II mandates a data-driven, auditable RFQ process, transforming counterparty evaluation into a quantitative discipline to ensure best execution. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Sleek metallic components with teal luminescence precisely intersect, symbolizing an institutional-grade Prime RFQ. This represents multi-leg spread execution for digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols, ensuring high-fidelity execution, optimal price discovery, and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-best-execution-system.jpg)

## Rfp Evaluation

Meaning ▴ RFP Evaluation denotes the structured, systematic process undertaken by an institutional entity to assess and score vendor proposals submitted in response to a Request for Proposal, specifically for technology and services pertaining to institutional digital asset derivatives. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/scoring-rubric/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precise metallic central hub with sharp, grey angular blades signifies high-fidelity execution and smart order routing. Intersecting transparent teal planes represent layered liquidity pools and multi-leg spread structures, illustrating complex market microstructure for efficient price discovery within institutional digital asset derivatives RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-for-high-fidelity-execution-across-market-microstructure-dynamics.jpg)

## Scoring Rubric

Meaning ▴ A Scoring Rubric represents a meticulously structured evaluation framework, comprising a defined set of criteria and associated weighting mechanisms, employed to objectively assess the performance, compliance, or quality of a system, process, or entity, often within the rigorous context of institutional digital asset operations or algorithmic execution performance assessment. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/why-do-dependency-based-anomaly-scores-provide-a-stronger-signal-for-financial-fraud-than-proximity-based-scores/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Two distinct, polished spherical halves, beige and teal, reveal intricate internal market microstructure, connected by a central metallic shaft. This embodies an institutional-grade RFQ protocol for digital asset derivatives, enabling high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement across disparate liquidity pools for principal block trades](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution-prime-os.jpg)

## Their Scores

Dependency-based scores provide a stronger signal by modeling the logical relationships between entities, detecting systemic fraud that proximity models miss. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-effectively-train-an-rfp-evaluation-committee-to-ensure-consistent-scoring/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, illuminated object, symbolizing an advanced RFQ protocol or Execution Management System, precisely intersects two broad surfaces representing liquidity pools within market microstructure. Its glowing line indicates high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement of digital asset derivatives, ensuring best execution and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principals-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-execution-digital-asset-derivatives-market-microstructure-price-discovery-alpha-generation.jpg)

## Consistent Evaluation

Training an RFP committee is the systemic calibration of human judgment to produce a consistent, data-driven procurement decision. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/consensus-meeting/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A central star-like form with sharp, metallic spikes intersects four teal planes, on black. This signifies an RFQ Protocol's precise Price Discovery and Liquidity Aggregation, enabling Algorithmic Execution for Multi-Leg Spread strategies, mitigating Counterparty Risk, and optimizing Capital Efficiency for institutional Digital Asset Derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-price-discovery-and-execution.jpg)

## Consensus Meeting

Meaning ▴ A Consensus Meeting represents a formalized procedural mechanism designed to achieve collective agreement among designated stakeholders regarding critical operational parameters, protocol adjustments, or strategic directional shifts within a distributed system or institutional framework. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-trade-offs-between-calendar-and-deviation-based-rebalancing/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract, sleek forms represent an institutional-grade Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives. Interlocking elements denote RFQ protocol optimization and price discovery across dark pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine-5.jpg)

## Standard Deviation

Calendar rebalancing offers operational simplicity; deviation-based rebalancing provides superior risk control by reacting to portfolio state. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-counterparty-performance-score-differ-from-a-traditional-credit-score/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sophisticated control panel, featuring concentric blue and white segments with two teal oval buttons. This embodies an institutional RFQ Protocol interface, facilitating High-Fidelity Execution for Private Quotation and Aggregated Inquiry](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-rfq-protocol-interface-for-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

## Average Score

A counterparty performance score is a dynamic, multi-factor model of transactional reliability, distinct from a traditional credit score's historical debt focus. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-management-software/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, multi-faceted plane represents a Principal's operational framework and Execution Management System. A central glossy black sphere signifies a block trade digital asset derivative, executed with atomic settlement via an RFQ protocol's private quotation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-principal-os-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Rfp Management Software

Meaning ▴ RFP Management Software represents a specialized enterprise application designed to standardize, automate, and optimize the Request for Proposal lifecycle for institutional entities. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/procurement-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![The abstract image visualizes a central Crypto Derivatives OS hub, precisely managing institutional trading workflows. Sharp, intersecting planes represent RFQ protocols extending to liquidity pools for options trading, ensuring high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/rfq-protocols-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-execution.jpg)

## Procurement Process

Meaning ▴ The Procurement Process defines a formalized methodology for acquiring necessary resources, such as liquidity, derivatives products, or technology infrastructure, within a controlled, auditable framework specifically tailored for institutional digital asset operations. </a>

**Tags:** [Procurement Process](https://options.greeks.live/area/procurement-process/), [Vendor Selection](https://options.greeks.live/area/vendor-selection/), [Inter-Rater Reliability](https://options.greeks.live/area/inter-rater-reliability/), [Evaluator Bias](https://options.greeks.live/area/evaluator-bias/), [Conflict of Interest Management](https://options.greeks.live/area/conflict-of-interest-management/), [Procurement Excellence](https://options.greeks.live/area/procurement-excellence/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [How Do You Quantify the Value of a Vendor’s Proposed Solution in an Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-quantify-the-value-of-a-vendors-proposed-solution-in-an-rfp/)
![The image displays a sleek, intersecting mechanism atop a foundational blue sphere. It represents the intricate market microstructure of institutional digital asset derivatives trading, facilitating RFQ protocols for block trades. The crossing elements symbolize multi-leg spread execution and aggregated liquidity, managed by a robust Prime RFQ for high-fidelity execution.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-rfq-execution.jpg)

Quantifying vendor value is an architectural process of translating proposal claims into a weighted, data-driven decision matrix.

- 
### [How Can an Organization Quantitatively Measure the Consistency among Its Rfp Evaluators?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-quantitatively-measure-the-consistency-among-its-rfp-evaluators/)
![A spherical, eye-like structure, an Institutional Prime RFQ, projects a sharp, focused beam. This visualizes high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols for digital asset derivatives, enabling block trades and multi-leg spreads with capital efficiency and best execution across market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-prime-os-rfq-protocol-digital-asset-derivatives-block-trade-execution.jpg)

Organizations measure evaluator consistency by applying statistical methods like Cohen's Kappa or ICC to scoring data, building a defensible, data-driven procurement system.

- 
### [What Is the Role of a Neutral Facilitator in Rfp Consensus Meetings and How Can They Maximize Their Effectiveness?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-role-of-a-neutral-facilitator-in-rfp-consensus-meetings-and-how-can-they-maximize-their-effectiveness/)
![A sleek, angular Prime RFQ interface component featuring a vibrant teal sphere, symbolizing a precise control point for institutional digital asset derivatives. This represents high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement within advanced RFQ protocols, optimizing price discovery and liquidity across complex market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-control-point.jpg)

A neutral facilitator architects and governs the RFP consensus process to ensure decision integrity through impartial procedural control.

- 
### [How Can a Weighted Scoring Matrix Mitigate Bias in an Rfp Evaluation?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-a-weighted-scoring-matrix-mitigate-bias-in-an-rfp-evaluation/)
![A dark blue, precision-engineered blade-like instrument, representing a digital asset derivative or multi-leg spread, rests on a light foundational block, symbolizing a private quotation or block trade. This structure intersects robust teal market infrastructure rails, indicating RFQ protocol execution within a Prime RFQ for high-fidelity execution and liquidity aggregation in institutional trading.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-framework-multi-leg-spreads-best-execution-capital-efficiency.jpg)

A weighted scoring matrix mitigates bias by translating subjective evaluations into a quantitative, auditable, and strategically aligned system.

- 
### [What Are the Primary Responsibilities of an Evaluation Committee during an Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-responsibilities-of-an-evaluation-committee-during-an-rfp/)
![Intersecting muted geometric planes, with a central glossy blue sphere. This abstract visualizes market microstructure for institutional digital asset derivatives. The sphere embodies a block trade or private quotation via RFQ protocols, ensuring high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement on a Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-5.jpg)

An RFP evaluation committee's primary role is to systematically and impartially assess vendor proposals against predefined criteria to recommend the best value solution.

- 
### [What Is the Role of a Scoring Calibration Session in Mitigating Evaluator Bias during the Rfp Process?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-role-of-a-scoring-calibration-session-in-mitigating-evaluator-bias-during-the-rfp-process/)
![A precision engineered system for institutional digital asset derivatives. Intricate components symbolize RFQ protocol execution, enabling high-fidelity price discovery and liquidity aggregation. This advanced market microstructure facilitates multi-leg spread strategies within a robust prime brokerage operational framework.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-precision-4.jpg)

A scoring calibration session is a control protocol that synchronizes human evaluators to mitigate bias and ensure RFP decisions reflect collective strategic intent.

- 
### [How Can You Mitigate Evaluator Bias When Using an Rfp Scoring Matrix?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-you-mitigate-evaluator-bias-when-using-an-rfp-scoring-matrix/)
![A precision-engineered interface for institutional digital asset derivatives. A circular system component, perhaps an Execution Management System EMS module, connects via a multi-faceted Request for Quote RFQ protocol bridge to a distinct teal capsule, symbolizing a bespoke block trade. This depicts high-fidelity execution, optimizing market microstructure within a Principal's operational framework for atomic settlement.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-interface-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-request-for-quote-protocol-high-fidelity-execution-within-principal-operating-system.jpg)

Mitigating evaluator bias in an RFP scoring matrix requires a disciplined system of weighted criteria, independent scoring, and structured consensus.

- 
### [How Can We Quantify the Impact of Evaluator Bias in an RFP Process?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-we-quantify-the-impact-of-evaluator-bias-in-an-rfp-process/)
![Abstract spheres and a translucent flow visualize institutional digital asset derivatives market microstructure. It depicts robust RFQ protocol execution, high-fidelity data flow, and seamless liquidity aggregation. This imagery underscores capital efficiency and atomic settlement within a Prime RFQ framework.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-market-microstructure-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-leveraging-rfq-protocols-and-atomic-settlement-across-prime-os.jpg)

Quantifying evaluator bias in RFPs involves applying statistical analysis to scoring data to measure and isolate the financial impact of cognitive deviations.

- 
### [What Are the Most Common Pitfalls to Avoid When Creating Rfp Evaluation Criteria?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-pitfalls-to-avoid-when-creating-rfp-evaluation-criteria/)
![A precision mechanism, potentially a component of a Crypto Derivatives OS, showcases intricate Market Microstructure for High-Fidelity Execution. Transparent elements suggest Price Discovery and Latent Liquidity within RFQ Protocols. Its robust design implies Capital Efficiency and minimized Slippage for Institutional Grade Digital Asset Derivatives trading.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-crypto-derivatives-rfq-engine-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

RFP evaluation criteria are a predictive model of vendor performance; their pitfalls are design flaws that corrupt decision integrity.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "How Do You Ensure Consistency across a Large, Diverse Rfp Evaluation Team?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-ensure-consistency-across-a-large-diverse-rfp-evaluation-team/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-ensure-consistency-across-a-large-diverse-rfp-evaluation-team/"
    },
    "headline": "How Do You Ensure Consistency across a Large, Diverse Rfp Evaluation Team? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "A structured framework with a calibrated scoring rubric and a trained, facilitated team ensures objective and defensible RFP evaluation. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-ensure-consistency-across-a-large-diverse-rfp-evaluation-team/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-09T22:01:28+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-08-09T22:01:36+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-rfq-protocols-optimizing-digital-asset-derivative-execution-microstructure.jpg",
        "caption": "This abstract visual metaphor illustrates institutional trading complexities in digital asset derivatives. The robust textured base signifies Prime Brokerage infrastructure and an Execution Management System EMS supporting RFQ protocols. The large, scratched blue sphere embodies the volatile market microstructure and implied volatility of the liquidity pool. The pristine teal sphere represents an optimal execution price for block trades or multi-leg spread options, facilitated by a structured atomic settlement pathway, ensuring best execution within a sophisticated Crypto Derivatives OS."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Conflict of Interest Management",
        "Consensus Meeting",
        "Evaluation Criteria",
        "Evaluator Bias",
        "Inter-Rater Reliability",
        "Procurement Excellence",
        "Procurement Process",
        "Proposal Assessment",
        "RFP Evaluation",
        "RFP Management Software",
        "Scoring Rubric",
        "Vendor Selection"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-ensure-consistency-across-a-large-diverse-rfp-evaluation-team/
