# How Do You Objectively Define the Weights for Each Criterion in an Rfp? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-10
**Categories:** Question

---

![Stacked, glossy modular components depict an institutional-grade Digital Asset Derivatives platform. Layers signify RFQ protocol orchestration, high-fidelity execution, and liquidity aggregation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/layered-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-stack-for-prime-brokerage.jpg)

![A layered, spherical structure reveals an inner metallic ring with intricate patterns, symbolizing market microstructure and RFQ protocol logic. A central teal dome represents a deep liquidity pool and precise price discovery, encased within robust institutional-grade infrastructure for high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-orchestrating-rfq-protocols-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-multi-asset-liquidity.jpg)

## Concept

The process of assigning weights to criteria within a Request for Proposal (RFP) is the foundational act of engineering a decision. It is the moment where an organization’s abstract [strategic priorities](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-properly-weight-rfp-evaluation-criteria-to-reflect-strategic-priorities/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) are translated into a concrete, mathematical framework for evaluation. The challenge resides in moving this critical process from the realm of subjective intuition ▴ often a product of boardroom consensus or the influence of the most persuasive stakeholder ▴ to a system of objective, defensible, and transparent logic.

An RFP’s outcome is determined not when the final vendor is selected, but when the weights are locked in. This initial step dictates the very definition of “value” for the project at hand.

A failure to systematically and objectively define these weights introduces significant organizational risk. It creates an environment where the selection process can be swayed by biases, where the chosen solution may not align with the most critical business needs, and where the final decision is difficult to defend under scrutiny. The entire purpose of a structured RFP process is to ensure that the organization makes the best possible decision based on a comprehensive understanding of its requirements. This purpose is fundamentally undermined if the very factors that determine the outcome are based on arbitrary or poorly defined parameters.

> Objectivity in RFP weighting is achieved by designing a system that translates high-level strategic goals into a granular, quantifiable, and auditable evaluation structure.

Therefore, the objective definition of weights is an exercise in strategic architecture. It requires a disciplined methodology that begins with the deconstruction of business goals into a hierarchy of evaluation criteria. Each criterion represents a specific dimension of performance, risk, or value that is relevant to the project’s success.

The weight assigned to each criterion is a direct expression of its importance relative to all other criteria in achieving the overarching goal. This structured approach ensures that the evaluation process is not merely a comparison of vendor proposals, but a rigorous test of how well each proposal aligns with the organization’s most critical objectives.

This perspective transforms the [weighting process](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-analytic-hierarchy-process-improve-objectivity-in-kpi-weighting/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) from a simple administrative task into a strategic imperative. It demands a framework capable of capturing the nuanced priorities of diverse stakeholders ▴ from finance and IT to operations and legal ▴ and synthesizing them into a single, coherent evaluation model. The result is a decision-making instrument that is not only fair and transparent but also a powerful tool for ensuring that significant investments deliver their intended value.

![A translucent sphere with intricate metallic rings, an 'intelligence layer' core, is bisected by a sleek, reflective blade. This visual embodies an 'institutional grade' 'Prime RFQ' enabling 'high-fidelity execution' of 'digital asset derivatives' via 'private quotation' and 'RFQ protocols', optimizing 'capital efficiency' and 'market microstructure' for 'block trade' operations](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-rfq-engine-for-digital-asset-derivatives-best-execution.jpg)

![A precision digital token, subtly green with a '0' marker, meticulously engages a sleek, white institutional-grade platform. This symbolizes secure RFQ protocol initiation for high-fidelity execution of complex multi-leg spread strategies, optimizing portfolio margin and capital efficiency within a Principal's Crypto Derivatives OS](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-platform-secure-rfq-protocol-initiation-for-optimal-block-trade-execution.jpg)

## Strategy

Developing a strategic framework for weighting RFP criteria involves establishing a systematic process that connects high-level business objectives to the granular details of the evaluation. This is not a single action but a multi-stage discipline designed to build consensus, ensure transparency, and create a defensible logic for the final decision. The core of this strategy is the transformation of qualitative business needs into a quantitative evaluation structure.

![A precise stack of multi-layered circular components visually representing a sophisticated Principal Digital Asset RFQ framework. Each distinct layer signifies a critical component within market microstructure for high-fidelity execution of institutional digital asset derivatives, embodying liquidity aggregation across dark pools, enabling private quotation and atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-digital-asset-rfq-protocol-layers-for-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## The Criterion Hierarchy a Foundation for Clarity

The initial step is to deconstruct the project’s goals into a comprehensive hierarchy of criteria. This process moves from the general to the specific, creating a clear and logical structure for the evaluation. A well-defined hierarchy prevents ambiguity and ensures that all relevant aspects of the vendor’s proposal are considered in a structured manner.

- **Level 1 The Goal** ▴ This is the overarching objective of the procurement. For instance, “Select a cloud-based Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system to improve operational efficiency and provide real-time financial reporting.”

- **Level 2 Main Criteria** ▴ These are the primary pillars of the decision. They represent the broad categories of requirements that contribute to the goal. Examples include Technical Capabilities, Financial Considerations, Vendor Profile, and Implementation Support.

- **Level 3 Sub-Criteria** ▴ Each main criterion is broken down into more specific, measurable components. For example, ‘Technical Capabilities’ might be divided into ‘System Performance,’ ‘Scalability,’ ‘Security Features,’ and ‘Integration Capabilities.’ ‘Financial Considerations’ could include ‘Total Cost of Ownership,’ ‘License Flexibility,’ and ‘Payment Terms.’

This hierarchical structure provides a comprehensive map of the decision problem. It ensures that all stakeholders are working from a common understanding of the evaluation framework and that no critical requirements are overlooked. This structured decomposition is the bedrock upon which [objective weighting](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-strategic-objective-of-a-project-influence-rfp-weighting/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is built.

![A luminous, multi-faceted geometric structure, resembling interlocking star-like elements, glows from a circular base. This represents a Prime RFQ for Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives, symbolizing high-fidelity execution of block trades via RFQ protocols, optimizing market microstructure for price discovery and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system.jpg)

## Stakeholder Calibration and Consensus Building

Different departments within an organization will naturally have different priorities. The finance department may be most concerned with the total cost of ownership, while the IT department may prioritize security and integration capabilities. A strategic weighting process must incorporate these diverse perspectives in a structured way, preventing the loudest voice from dominating the decision.

A formal calibration process, such as a facilitated workshop, is essential. During this process, stakeholders review the criterion hierarchy and collectively determine the relative importance of each element. This is not a simple voting exercise. Instead, it involves structured discussion and debate, guided by a neutral facilitator.

The goal is to arrive at a consensus on the strategic priorities of the project, which can then be translated into numerical weights. This collaborative approach builds buy-in from all stakeholders and ensures that the final weighting scheme reflects the balanced needs of the organization.

> A structured weighting model acts as a translation layer, converting the language of business strategy into the mathematical language of evaluation.

![A sleek metallic teal execution engine, representing a Crypto Derivatives OS, interfaces with a luminous pre-trade analytics display. This abstract view depicts institutional RFQ protocols enabling high-fidelity execution for multi-leg spreads, optimizing market microstructure and atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/advanced-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-market-microstructure-analysis.jpg)

## Selecting the Appropriate Weighting Methodology

Once the criteria are defined and stakeholder priorities are understood, the next step is to select a formal methodology for assigning weights. The choice of methodology depends on the complexity of the RFP and the level of rigor required. The two primary strategic approaches are direct allocation and [pairwise comparison](https://prime.greeks.live/area/pairwise-comparison/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite).

The following table provides a strategic comparison of these common methodologies:

| Methodology | Description | Strengths | Weaknesses | Best Suited For |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Direct Point Allocation | Stakeholders are given a set number of points (e.g. 100) to distribute among the main criteria. The weight of each criterion is its percentage of the total points. | Simple to understand and implement. Fast and requires minimal training. | Can be less precise for complex decisions. Prone to cognitive biases where stakeholders may anchor on initial numbers. Does not check for consistency in judgment. | Low to medium complexity RFPs where speed is important and the criteria are relatively independent. |
| Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) | A structured technique that involves comparing each criterion against every other criterion in a pairwise fashion to determine its relative importance. Mathematical calculations are used to derive the weights and check for logical consistency. | Highly structured and rigorous. Reduces bias by focusing on one-on-one comparisons. Includes a mechanism (the Consistency Ratio) to measure the logical consistency of judgments. Creates a highly defensible and auditable trail. | More time-consuming and complex to implement. Requires specialized knowledge or software. The number of comparisons increases significantly as the number of criteria grows. | High-stakes, complex RFPs with many interdependent criteria, where objectivity and defensibility are paramount. |

The selection of a methodology is a strategic choice in itself. For a high-value, complex technology acquisition, the rigor and defensibility of AHP may be necessary. For a more straightforward commodity purchase, the simplicity of direct point allocation may suffice. The key is to make a conscious, informed decision about the level of analytical rigor required for the specific procurement.

![Precision metallic mechanism with a central translucent sphere, embodying institutional RFQ protocols for digital asset derivatives. This core represents high-fidelity execution within a Prime RFQ, optimizing price discovery and liquidity aggregation for block trades, ensuring capital efficiency and atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-prime-os-execution-hub.jpg)

![An arc of interlocking, alternating pale green and dark grey segments, with black dots on light segments. This symbolizes a modular RFQ protocol for institutional digital asset derivatives, representing discrete private quotation phases or aggregated inquiry nodes](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/modular-rfq-protocol-segments-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

## Execution

The execution of an objective weighting strategy is a disciplined, multi-phase process that transforms strategic intent into a functional, auditable decision-making system. This is where the theoretical frameworks are applied, data is generated, and the final evaluation model is constructed. It requires meticulous attention to detail and a commitment to the integrity of the process.

![A central processing core with intersecting, transparent structures revealing intricate internal components and blue data flows. This symbolizes an institutional digital asset derivatives platform's Prime RFQ, orchestrating high-fidelity execution, managing aggregated RFQ inquiries, and ensuring atomic settlement within dynamic market microstructure, optimizing capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-system-facilitating-high-fidelity-rfq-protocol-optimization-for-best-execution-and-atomic-settlement.jpg)

## The Operational Playbook

This playbook outlines the sequential steps required to implement a robust and objective criteria weighting system, moving from initial setup to final validation. It is designed to be a practical guide for procurement leaders and evaluation teams.

- 
**Phase 1 Criterion Finalization and Hierarchy Validation.** The first operational step is to finalize the criterion hierarchy developed during the strategy phase. This involves a final review by the core evaluation team to ensure that all criteria are:

<li>**Distinct** ▴ Each criterion should measure a unique aspect of the proposal to avoid double-counting.

- **Measurable** ▴ There must be a clear way to score a vendor’s proposal against each criterion, whether quantitatively (e.g. price) or qualitatively (e.g. through a defined scoring rubric).

- **Relevant** ▴ Every criterion must directly contribute to the overarching goal of the RFP. Any extraneous criteria should be eliminated.

The final, validated hierarchy is then formally documented and serves as the official structure for the remainder of the process.

</li>
- 
**Phase 2 Selection and Briefing of the [Evaluation Committee](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-should-an-rfp-evaluation-committee-be-structured-to-ensure-an-unbiased-and-effective-decision/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite).** The success of the weighting process depends on the knowledge and engagement of the evaluation committee. This committee should be composed of stakeholders from all relevant departments. Each member must be formally briefed on their role, the chosen weighting methodology (e.g.
AHP), and the importance of objective, unbiased judgment. This briefing sets the stage for a disciplined and consistent evaluation.

- 
**Phase 3 The Weighting Workshop.** This is the central event of the execution phase. It is a structured, facilitated session where the evaluation committee performs the weighting exercise. If using the [Analytic Hierarchy Process](https://prime.greeks.live/area/analytic-hierarchy-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (AHP), the workshop would proceed as follows:

<li>The facilitator presents one pair of criteria at a time (e.g. “Compare the importance of ‘Technical Capabilities’ versus ‘Financial Considerations'”).

- Each committee member privately makes a judgment using the standard AHP nine-point scale (where 1 = equal importance, and 9 = extreme importance of one over the other).

- The facilitator collects the judgments and enters them into the AHP software or spreadsheet. The geometric mean of the group’s judgments is often used to form a single, representative [comparison matrix](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-structure-an-rfp-evaluation-matrix-for-objective-vendor-comparison/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite).

- This process is repeated for all pairs of criteria.

</li>
- 
**Phase 4 Calculation and Consistency Check.** Immediately following the workshop, the weights for each criterion are calculated from the completed [pairwise comparison matrix](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-structure-an-rfp-evaluation-matrix-for-objective-vendor-comparison/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). A critical step in the AHP methodology is the calculation of the [Consistency Ratio](https://prime.greeks.live/area/consistency-ratio/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (CR). This ratio measures the degree of logical consistency in the pairwise judgments. A CR of 0.10 or less is generally considered acceptable.
If the CR is too high, it indicates contradictory judgments (e.g. A is more important than B, B is more important than C, but C is more important than A). In such cases, the team must revisit the most inconsistent judgments to refine their logic.

- 
**Phase 5 Sensitivity Analysis.** Once a consistent set of weights is established, a sensitivity analysis should be performed. This involves slightly altering the weights of the most important criteria to see how it might affect the final ranking of potential vendors. This analysis helps the team understand the robustness of their decision model. If a small change in a weight could flip the winning vendor, it highlights a critical and potentially contentious area of the evaluation that may require further discussion.

- 
**Phase 6 Finalization and Documentation.** The final, validated weights are formally documented along with the methodology used, the participants in the weighting workshop, and the results of the consistency check. This documentation creates a transparent and auditable record of the decision-making process, which is invaluable for internal governance and for defending the selection against any potential challenges. The finalized weights are then locked and communicated as part of the RFP, ensuring all vendors understand the evaluation framework.

![A sleek, segmented cream and dark gray automated device, depicting an institutional grade Prime RFQ engine. It represents precise execution management system functionality for digital asset derivatives, optimizing price discovery and high-fidelity execution within market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-engine-optimal-institutional-digital-asset-execution-system.jpg)

## Quantitative Modeling and Data Analysis

The core of objective weighting lies in the application of quantitative models. The [Analytic Hierarchy](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-analytic-hierarchy-process-improve-objectivity-in-kpi-weighting/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) Process (AHP) provides a powerful and widely accepted framework for this purpose. It translates human judgments about preferences into a set of numerical weights.

![A vertically stacked assembly of diverse metallic and polymer components, resembling a modular lens system, visually represents the layered architecture of institutional digital asset derivatives. Each distinct ring signifies a critical market microstructure element, from RFQ protocol layers to aggregated liquidity pools, ensuring high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency within a Prime RFQ framework](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-execution-stack.jpg)

## Deep Dive the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in Practice

The AHP model is built upon the pairwise comparison matrix. This matrix captures the relative importance of each criterion when compared to every other criterion. Let’s consider a simplified RFP for a new Customer Relationship Management (CRM) system with four main criteria ▴ **Functionality (FUNC)**, **Cost (COST)**, **Implementation Support (IMPL)**, and **[Vendor Viability](https://prime.greeks.live/question/in-procuring-a-complex-saas-platform-how-should-an-rfp-balance-technical-requirements-with-vendor-viability/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (VEND)**.

The evaluation committee would make the following pairwise comparisons:

**Table 1 Example Pairwise Comparison Matrix**

| Criterion | Functionality (FUNC) | Cost (COST) | Implementation (IMPL) | Vendor Viability (VEND) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Functionality (FUNC) | 1 | 3 | 5 | 2 |
| Cost (COST) | 1/3 | 1 | 3 | 1/2 |
| Implementation (IMPL) | 1/5 | 1/3 | 1 | 1/4 |
| Vendor Viability (VEND) | 1/2 | 2 | 4 | 1 |

**Interpretation of the Matrix** ▴ 

- The value of 3 in the (FUNC, COST) cell means the committee judged Functionality to be ‘moderately more important’ than Cost.

- The reciprocal value of 1/3 is automatically placed in the (COST, FUNC) cell.

- The value of 1/5 in the (IMPL, FUNC) cell means Functionality was judged to be ‘strongly more important’ than Implementation Support.

From this matrix, a mathematical procedure (calculating the principal eigenvector) is used to derive the final criteria weights. The process also involves calculating the consistency ratio to ensure the judgments are logical.

**Table 2 Derived Weights and Consistency Check**

| Criterion | Derived Weight | Interpretation |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Functionality (FUNC) | 47.8% | The most critical factor in the decision. |
| Cost (COST) | 18.5% | A significant, but secondary, consideration. |
| Implementation (IMPL) | 8.6% | Important, but the least critical of the four main criteria. |
| Vendor Viability (VEND) | 25.1% | The second most important factor, reflecting the need for a long-term, stable partner. |
| Consistency Ratio (CR) | 0.07 | The CR is less than 0.10, indicating the judgments are acceptably consistent. |

This quantitative model provides a clear, defensible set of weights that directly reflect the structured judgments of the evaluation committee. These weights are then applied to the normalized scores of each vendor’s proposal to determine the final ranking.

![A sleek cream-colored device with a dark blue optical sensor embodies Price Discovery for Digital Asset Derivatives. It signifies High-Fidelity Execution via RFQ Protocols, driven by an Intelligence Layer optimizing Market Microstructure for Algorithmic Trading on a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-high-fidelity-execution-engine-optimized-rfq-protocols-prime-os-intelligence-layer.jpg)

## Predictive Scenario Analysis

To illustrate the power of this objective framework, consider a detailed case study. A mid-sized manufacturing firm, “Precision Components Inc. ” initiated an RFP to select a new supply chain management software. The primary goals were to reduce inventory holding costs, improve on-time delivery rates, and gain better visibility into their logistics network.

The evaluation committee, consisting of the COO, CFO, Head of IT, and Procurement Director, was convened. They identified four primary criteria ▴ Core Functionality, Total Cost of Ownership (TCO), Ease of Integration, and Vendor Support Model. Using the AHP methodology, they engaged in a facilitated weighting workshop. The initial pairwise comparisons resulted in a Consistency Ratio of 0.18, which was unacceptably high.

The facilitator guided the team through a review of their most inconsistent judgments. The primary source of inconsistency was a disagreement between the CFO, who initially rated TCO as extremely important relative to everything else, and the COO, who prioritized Core Functionality to a similar degree. The discussion revealed that while cost was a major concern, the system’s failure to meet functional requirements would lead to operational disruptions far more costly than any potential savings. This insight allowed the CFO to revise his judgment, leading to a new set of comparisons with a Consistency Ratio of 0.06. The final, validated weights were determined to be ▴ Core Functionality (45%), TCO (25%), Ease of Integration (20%), and Vendor Support Model (10%).

Three vendors submitted proposals. Vendor A offered a highly sophisticated, feature-rich platform at a premium price. Vendor B proposed a lower-cost solution that met most, but not all, functional requirements. Vendor C provided a mid-range offering with a strong focus on integration and a flexible support model.

Each proposal was scored on a 1-10 scale for each sub-criterion by the subject matter experts. After normalizing the scores, the weighted evaluation was calculated. Vendor A, despite its high cost, scored exceptionally well on Core Functionality, giving it a significant lead. Vendor B, the cheapest option, fell short on key functional requirements, and its low score in that heavily weighted category severely impacted its overall ranking.

Vendor C performed adequately across the board but excelled in Ease of Integration. The final weighted scores revealed Vendor A as the clear winner. The CFO, who had initially been inclined towards the lowest-cost option (Vendor B), could now clearly see how that choice would have compromised the most critical strategic objective of the project. The AHP framework provided a transparent, logical path that led the entire committee to a consensus decision that was directly tied to their agreed-upon strategic priorities, preventing a costly mistake driven by a singular focus on price.

![A sophisticated digital asset derivatives trading mechanism features a central processing hub with luminous blue accents, symbolizing an intelligence layer driving high fidelity execution. Transparent circular elements represent dynamic liquidity pools and a complex volatility surface, revealing market microstructure and atomic settlement via an advanced RFQ protocol](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution-framework-optimizing-market-microstructure-price-discovery-intelligence-layer.jpg)

## System Integration and Technological Architecture

The objective weighting process does not exist in a vacuum. Its value is maximized when it is integrated into the organization’s broader procurement and financial technology architecture. This integration ensures that the data-driven approach to decision-making is repeatable, auditable, and efficient.

![A central glowing blue mechanism with a precision reticle is encased by dark metallic panels. This symbolizes an institutional-grade Principal's operational framework for high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-core-enabling-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution.jpg)

## Integration with E-Procurement Platforms

Modern e-procurement and [strategic sourcing](https://prime.greeks.live/area/strategic-sourcing/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) platforms are designed to manage the entire RFP lifecycle. The weighting models developed through processes like AHP should be directly configurable within these systems. This involves:

- **Configurable Weighting Modules** ▴ The platform should allow administrators to input the main criteria and sub-criteria, and then assign the calculated weights (e.g. 47.8% for Functionality) to each.

- **Automated Score Calculation** ▴ As evaluators enter their scores for each vendor against each sub-criterion, the system should automatically calculate the weighted scores in real-time. This eliminates the risk of manual calculation errors and provides the evaluation committee with an up-to-the-minute view of the rankings.

- **Role-Based Access Control** ▴ The system must ensure that only authorized personnel can set or modify the criteria weights, preserving the integrity of the evaluation framework.

![A precise geometric prism reflects on a dark, structured surface, symbolizing institutional digital asset derivatives market microstructure. This visualizes block trade execution and price discovery for multi-leg spreads via RFQ protocols, ensuring high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency within Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-precision-execution.jpg)

## Data Architecture for Audit and Analysis

The data generated during the weighting and evaluation process is a valuable organizational asset. A robust data architecture is needed to store and manage this information effectively.

- **Centralized Data Repository** ▴ All RFP-related data ▴ including the criteria hierarchy, the pairwise comparison judgments, the final weights, evaluator scores, and vendor proposals ▴ should be stored in a centralized database.

- **Audit Trail** ▴ The system must maintain a detailed audit log of all changes to the weighting model, including who made the change, when it was made, and the reason for the change. This is critical for governance and compliance.

- **Analytics and Reporting** ▴ By storing this data in a structured format, organizations can perform historical analysis on past RFPs. This can reveal trends in vendor performance, identify common areas of disagreement among stakeholders, and help refine the criteria and weighting for future projects. For example, analysis might show that the “Vendor Support” criterion has consistently been a strong predictor of long-term project success, suggesting its weight should be increased in future evaluations.

![A close-up of a sophisticated, multi-component mechanism, representing the core of an institutional-grade Crypto Derivatives OS. Its precise engineering suggests high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement, crucial for robust RFQ protocols, ensuring optimal price discovery and capital efficiency in multi-leg spread trading](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-rfq-engine-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

## References

- Saaty, Thomas L. _The Analytic Hierarchy Process ▴ Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation_. McGraw-Hill, 1980.

- Vargas, Luis G. “An Overview of the Analytic Hierarchy Process ▴ Its Applications and Limitations.” _International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making_, vol. 9, no. 4, 2010, pp. 565-579.

- Forman, Ernest H. and Saul I. Gass. “The Analytic Hierarchy Process ▴ An Exposition.” _Operations Research_, vol. 49, no. 4, 2001, pp. 469-486.

- Ho, William. “Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications – A literature review.” _European Journal of Operational Research_, vol. 186, no. 1, 2008, pp. 211-228.

- Vaidya, Omkarprasad S. and Sushil Kumar. “Analytic hierarchy process ▴ An overview of applications.” _European Journal of Operational Research_, vol. 169, no. 1, 2006, pp. 1-29.

- Bhushan, Navin, and Kanwal Rai. _Strategic Decision Making ▴ Applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process_. Springer Science & Business Media, 2004.

- De Felice, Fabio, and Antonella Petrillo. “A multiple choice decision analysis ▴ the Analytic Hierarchy Process for evaluating vendors.” _International Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology_, vol. 2, no. 9, 2010, pp. 10-21.

- Tahriri, F. et al. “AHP approach for supplier evaluation and selection in a steel manufacturing company.” _Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management_, vol. 1, no. 2, 2008, pp. 54-76.

![A polished metallic modular hub with four radiating arms represents an advanced RFQ execution engine. This system aggregates multi-venue liquidity for institutional digital asset derivatives, enabling high-fidelity execution and precise price discovery across diverse counterparty risk profiles, powered by a sophisticated intelligence layer](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/principal-rfq-hub-digital-asset-derivatives-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## Reflection

Adopting a quantitative, systematic approach to defining RFP criteria weights is an act of organizational maturation. It signals a shift from subjective, personality-driven decisions to a culture of objective, data-informed strategic execution. The frameworks and models discussed are not merely academic exercises; they are operational tools designed to build alignment, mitigate risk, and forge a direct, unbreakable link between an organization’s highest strategic priorities and its most significant investments. The process forces uncomfortable but necessary conversations, compelling diverse stakeholders to negotiate and codify their priorities into a unified logic.

The true value of this discipline extends far beyond any single procurement. It builds a reusable institutional capability for making complex, high-stakes decisions with clarity and confidence. The auditable trail it creates provides a powerful defense against challenges, but more importantly, it serves as a repository of organizational wisdom.

By analyzing the weighting and outcomes of past decisions, an organization can refine its understanding of what truly drives value, continuously improving its ability to select partners and solutions that will fuel its future success. The ultimate goal is to construct an operational framework where every major procurement decision is a direct, calculated, and defensible step toward achieving the organization’s core mission.

![A deconstructed spherical object, segmented into distinct horizontal layers, slightly offset, symbolizing the granular components of an institutional digital asset derivatives platform. Each layer represents a liquidity pool or RFQ protocol, showcasing modular execution pathways and dynamic price discovery within a Prime RFQ architecture for high-fidelity execution and systemic risk mitigation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/modular-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-framework-dissected-for-optimal-rfq-performance.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-properly-weight-rfp-evaluation-criteria-to-reflect-strategic-priorities/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![An exploded view reveals the precision engineering of an institutional digital asset derivatives trading platform, showcasing layered components for high-fidelity execution and RFQ protocol management. This architecture facilitates aggregated liquidity, optimal price discovery, and robust portfolio margin calculations, minimizing slippage and counterparty risk](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-microstructure.jpg)

## Strategic Priorities

Weighting RFP criteria translates strategic priorities into a quantitative decision engine for defensible vendor selection. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-analytic-hierarchy-process-improve-objectivity-in-kpi-weighting/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sophisticated institutional digital asset derivatives platform unveils its core market microstructure. Intricate circuitry powers a central blue spherical RFQ protocol engine on a polished circular surface](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-unveiling-rfq-protocol-engine-market-microstructure-for-optimal-price-discovery-and-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Weighting Process

The Analytic Hierarchy Process improves objectivity by structuring decisions and using pairwise comparisons to create transparent, consistent KPI weights. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-strategic-objective-of-a-project-influence-rfp-weighting/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precision probe, symbolizing Smart Order Routing, penetrates a multi-faceted teal crystal, representing Digital Asset Derivatives multi-leg spreads and volatility surface. Mounted on a Prime RFQ base, it illustrates RFQ protocols for high-fidelity execution within market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-digital-asset-derivatives-high-fidelity-execution-probe.jpg)

## Objective Weighting

A project's strategic objective is the blueprint for its RFP weighting, translating priorities into a mathematical vendor selection model. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/pairwise-comparison/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Brushed metallic and colored modular components represent an institutional-grade Prime RFQ facilitating RFQ protocols for digital asset derivatives. The precise engineering signifies high-fidelity execution, atomic settlement, and capital efficiency within a sophisticated market microstructure for multi-leg spread trading](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-grade-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-execution-system.jpg)

## Pairwise Comparison

Meaning ▴ Pairwise Comparison is a systematic method for evaluating entities by comparing them two at a time, across a defined set of criteria, to establish a relative preference or value. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-should-an-rfp-evaluation-committee-be-structured-to-ensure-an-unbiased-and-effective-decision/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A central RFQ aggregation engine radiates segments, symbolizing distinct liquidity pools and market makers. This depicts multi-dealer RFQ protocol orchestration for high-fidelity price discovery in digital asset derivatives, highlighting diverse counterparty risk profiles and algorithmic pricing grids](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/centralized-digital-asset-rfq-orchestration-for-multi-venue-liquidity-aggregation-and-high-fidelity-execution-across-diverse-counterparties.jpg)

## Evaluation Committee

A structured RFP committee, governed by pre-defined criteria and bias mitigation protocols, ensures defensible and high-value procurement decisions. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/analytic-hierarchy-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Robust institutional Prime RFQ core connects to a precise RFQ protocol engine. Multi-leg spread execution blades propel a digital asset derivative target, optimizing price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-proto-insti-digital-asset-derivs-hi-fi-exec-capital-effi-risk-mgmt.jpg)

## Analytic Hierarchy Process

Meaning ▴ The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) constitutes a structured methodology for organizing and analyzing complex decision problems, particularly those involving multiple, often conflicting, criteria and subjective judgments. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-structure-an-rfp-evaluation-matrix-for-objective-vendor-comparison/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A blue speckled marble, symbolizing a precise block trade, rests centrally on a translucent bar, representing a robust RFQ protocol. This structured geometric arrangement illustrates complex market microstructure, enabling high-fidelity execution, optimal price discovery, and efficient liquidity aggregation within a principal's operational framework for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-institutional-rfq-execution-framework-optimizing-digital-asset-derivatives-liquidity-aggregation-across-complex-market-microstructure.jpg)

## Comparison Matrix

An RFP evaluation matrix is a weighted scoring system that translates complex vendor proposals into an objective, data-driven comparison. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-structure-an-rfp-evaluation-matrix-for-objective-vendor-comparison/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A geometric abstraction depicts a central multi-segmented disc intersected by angular teal and white structures, symbolizing a sophisticated Principal-driven RFQ protocol engine. This represents high-fidelity execution, optimizing price discovery across diverse liquidity pools for institutional digital asset derivatives like Bitcoin options, ensuring atomic settlement and mitigating counterparty risk](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-for-prime-os.jpg)

## Pairwise Comparison Matrix

An RFP evaluation matrix is a weighted scoring system that translates complex vendor proposals into an objective, data-driven comparison. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/consistency-ratio/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precision mechanism, symbolizing an algorithmic trading engine, centrally mounted on a market microstructure surface. Lens-like features represent liquidity pools and an intelligence layer for pre-trade analytics, enabling high-fidelity execution of institutional grade digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols within a Principal's operational framework](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-microstructure.jpg)

## Consistency Ratio

Meaning ▴ The Consistency Ratio is a quantitative metric employed to assess the logical coherence and reliability of subjective judgments within a pairwise comparison matrix, predominantly utilized in the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-analytic-hierarchy-process-improve-objectivity-in-kpi-weighting/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precise digital asset derivatives trading mechanism, featuring transparent data conduits symbolizing RFQ protocol execution and multi-leg spread strategies. Intricate gears visualize market microstructure, ensuring high-fidelity execution and robust price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-framework.jpg)

## Analytic Hierarchy

The Analytic Hierarchy Process improves objectivity by structuring decisions and using pairwise comparisons to create transparent, consistent KPI weights. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/in-procuring-a-complex-saas-platform-how-should-an-rfp-balance-technical-requirements-with-vendor-viability/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Mirrored abstract components with glowing indicators, linked by an articulated mechanism, depict an institutional grade Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives. This visualizes RFQ protocol driven high-fidelity execution, price discovery, and atomic settlement across market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-rfq-high-fidelity-execution-microstructure.jpg)

## Vendor Viability

A successful SaaS RFP architects a symbiotic relationship where technical efficacy is sustained by verifiable vendor stability. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/strategic-sourcing/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A dark, reflective surface features a segmented circular mechanism, reminiscent of an RFQ aggregation engine or liquidity pool. Specks suggest market microstructure dynamics or data latency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-options-rfq-execution-microstructure-prime-os.jpg)

## Strategic Sourcing

Meaning ▴ Strategic Sourcing, within the domain of institutional digital asset derivatives, denotes a disciplined, systematic methodology for identifying, evaluating, and engaging with external providers of critical services and infrastructure. </a>

**Tags:** [Procurement Decision Models](https://options.greeks.live/area/procurement-decision-models/), [Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis](https://options.greeks.live/area/multi-criteria-decision-analysis/), [Quantitative Vendor Selection](https://options.greeks.live/area/quantitative-vendor-selection/), [RFP Criteria Weighting](https://options.greeks.live/area/rfp-criteria-weighting/), [Pairwise Comparison](https://options.greeks.live/area/pairwise-comparison/), [Consistency Ratio](https://options.greeks.live/area/consistency-ratio/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [How Can an Organization Mitigate the Risks Associated with the Increased Complexity of a Hybrid Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-mitigate-the-risks-associated-with-the-increased-complexity-of-a-hybrid-rfp/)
![Two abstract, segmented forms intersect, representing dynamic RFQ protocol interactions and price discovery mechanisms. The layered structures symbolize liquidity aggregation across multi-leg spreads within complex market microstructure. This visualizes institutional execution pathways, emphasizing atomic settlement and capital efficiency in digital asset derivatives.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-microstructure.jpg)

An organization mitigates hybrid RFP risks by architecting a disciplined framework of proactive governance and quantitative evaluation.

- 
### [What Is the Relationship between Corporate Strategic Goals and Tactical RFP Criteria?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-relationship-between-corporate-strategic-goals-and-tactical-rfp-criteria/)
![Abstract intersecting geometric forms, deep blue and light beige, represent advanced RFQ protocols for institutional digital asset derivatives. These forms signify multi-leg execution strategies, principal liquidity aggregation, and high-fidelity algorithmic pricing against a textured global market sphere, reflecting robust market microstructure and intelligence layer.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-multi-leg-execution-algorithmic-pricing-global-liquidity-principal-trading-systemic-integration-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

Corporate strategy dictates the 'why'; tactical RFP criteria provide the 'how,' creating a systemic link between vision and execution.

- 
### [What Is the Most Effective Way to Structure an RFP Scoring Rubric to Minimize Bias?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-most-effective-way-to-structure-an-rfp-scoring-rubric-to-minimize-bias/)
![A sophisticated metallic mechanism with a central pivoting component and parallel structural elements, indicative of a precision engineered RFQ engine. Polished surfaces and visible fasteners suggest robust algorithmic trading infrastructure for high-fidelity execution and latency optimization. Circular depressions imply aggregated inquiry points, facilitating price discovery for institutional digital asset derivatives within a Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-mechanism-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-and-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

A meticulously weighted rubric, executed with blind scoring and consensus-driven evaluation, is the most effective system for minimizing bias.

- 
### [How Do You Quantify Qualitative Factors like Cultural Fit in a Strategic Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-quantify-qualitative-factors-like-cultural-fit-in-a-strategic-rfp/)
![A dark, metallic, circular mechanism with central spindle and concentric rings embodies a Prime RFQ for Atomic Settlement. A precise black bar, symbolizing High-Fidelity Execution via FIX Protocol, traverses the surface, highlighting Market Microstructure for Digital Asset Derivatives and RFQ inquiries, enabling Capital Efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-microstructure-1.jpg)

Quantifying cultural fit is an exercise in decision architecture, translating subjective attributes into an objective, weighted data model.

- 
### [How Does the Analytic Hierarchy Process Handle Subjective Criteria in an Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-analytic-hierarchy-process-handle-subjective-criteria-in-an-rfp/)
![An abstract digital interface features a dark circular screen with two luminous dots, one teal and one grey, symbolizing active and pending private quotation statuses within an RFQ protocol. Below, sharp parallel lines in black, beige, and grey delineate distinct liquidity pools and execution pathways for multi-leg spread strategies, reflecting market microstructure and high-fidelity execution for institutional grade digital asset derivatives.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-displaying-multi-leg-execution-status-and-optimal-liquidity-pathways.jpg)

AHP structures subjective RFP criteria by decomposing the decision into a hierarchy and using pairwise comparisons to quantify priorities.

- 
### [What Is the Most Effective Way to Weight Criteria in an Rfp Scorecard?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-most-effective-way-to-weight-criteria-in-an-rfp-scorecard/)
![Abstract forms on dark, a sphere balanced by intersecting planes. This signifies high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives, embodying RFQ protocols and price discovery within a Prime RFQ. It represents market microstructure, managing latent liquidity and counterparty risk for block trades.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-platform-microstructure-execution-prime-os.jpg)

An effective RFP scorecard weights criteria through a collaborative, data-driven process that quantifies strategic priorities.

- 
### [How Can an Organization Objectively Score Qualitative Criteria like Vendor Vision or Cultural Fit in an Rfp Evaluation?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-objectively-score-qualitative-criteria-like-vendor-vision-or-cultural-fit-in-an-rfp-evaluation/)
![Mirrored abstract components with glowing indicators, linked by an articulated mechanism, depict an institutional grade Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives. This visualizes RFQ protocol driven high-fidelity execution, price discovery, and atomic settlement across market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-rfq-high-fidelity-execution-microstructure.jpg)

Objectively scoring qualitative RFP criteria requires deconstructing abstract concepts into a matrix of weighted, measurable indicators.

- 
### [How Can We Quantify Qualitative Rfp Evaluation Criteria?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-we-quantify-qualitative-rfp-evaluation-criteria/)
![Intersecting transparent and opaque geometric planes, symbolizing the intricate market microstructure of institutional digital asset derivatives. Visualizes high-fidelity execution and price discovery via RFQ protocols, demonstrating multi-leg spread strategies and dark liquidity for capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-market-microstructure-architecture.jpg)

Quantifying qualitative RFP criteria translates subjective value into a defensible, data-driven selection architecture.

- 
### [What Are the First Steps to Creating a Modular RFP Evaluation Framework?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-first-steps-to-creating-a-modular-rfp-evaluation-framework/)
![A complex, multi-component 'Prime RFQ' core with a central lens, symbolizing 'Price Discovery' for 'Digital Asset Derivatives'. Dynamic teal 'liquidity flows' suggest 'Atomic Settlement' and 'Capital Efficiency'. This 'Market Microstructure' representation enables 'High-Fidelity Execution' and 'Algorithmic Trading' for 'RFQ' protocols and 'Private Quotation'.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine.jpg)

A modular RFP evaluation framework is a system for deconstructing needs into weighted, measurable components to enable objective decision-making.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "How Do You Objectively Define the Weights for Each Criterion in an Rfp?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-objectively-define-the-weights-for-each-criterion-in-an-rfp/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-objectively-define-the-weights-for-each-criterion-in-an-rfp/"
    },
    "headline": "How Do You Objectively Define the Weights for Each Criterion in an Rfp? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "Objectively defining RFP weights requires a system, like the Analytic Hierarchy Process, to translate strategic priorities into a defensible, quantitative evaluation model. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-objectively-define-the-weights-for-each-criterion-in-an-rfp/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-10T06:10:44+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-08-10T06:10:55+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/layered-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-stack-for-prime-brokerage.jpg",
        "caption": "A sophisticated stack of modular, glossy components visually encapsulates a cutting-edge Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives trading platform. Each layer symbolizes distinct functionalities within a comprehensive Prime RFQ framework, spanning advanced RFQ protocol handling, price discovery, high-fidelity execution, and atomic settlement. This architecture optimizes market microstructure, ensuring best execution and mitigating counterparty risk for Bitcoin options and Ethereum futures, enabling capital efficiency and dark pool access."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Analytic Hierarchy Process",
        "Consistency Ratio",
        "Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis",
        "Pairwise Comparison",
        "Procurement Decision Models",
        "Procurement Governance",
        "Quantitative Vendor Selection",
        "RFP Criteria Weighting",
        "RFP Scoring Model",
        "Strategic Sourcing",
        "Supplier Evaluation"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-objectively-define-the-weights-for-each-criterion-in-an-rfp/
