# How Does a Weighted Scoring Model Improve the RFP Evaluation Process? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-09
**Categories:** Question

---

![The image displays a sleek, intersecting mechanism atop a foundational blue sphere. It represents the intricate market microstructure of institutional digital asset derivatives trading, facilitating RFQ protocols for block trades](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-rfq-execution.jpg)

![Precisely aligned forms depict an institutional trading system's RFQ protocol interface. Circular elements symbolize market data feeds and price discovery for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-interface-optimization.jpg)

## Concept

The evaluation of a Request for Proposal (RFP) represents a critical juncture in an organization’s operational trajectory. It is a complex confluence of technical requirements, financial constraints, and strategic ambitions, often involving a wide array of internal stakeholders whose perspectives and priorities diverge. The inherent challenge lies in synthesizing these disparate viewpoints into a single, coherent, and defensible decision.

Without a guiding structure, this process can descend into a qualitative impasse, where the loudest voice or the most persuasive argument, rather than the most rational analysis, dictates the outcome. The result is frequently a suboptimal selection, a compromised implementation, and a cascade of downstream operational frictions.

A [weighted scoring model](https://prime.greeks.live/area/weighted-scoring-model/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) introduces a robust architecture for navigating this complexity. It functions as a decision-making operating system, translating an organization’s strategic objectives into a quantifiable and logical evaluation framework. This system is built upon a foundation of clearly articulated criteria, each assigned a specific ‘weight’ that reflects its relative importance to the overall success of the project. Vendor proposals are then systematically scored against these criteria.

The final output is a numerical ranking, derived directly from the logical structure of the model, which provides a clear, data-driven basis for selection. This methodological rigor transforms the evaluation from a subjective debate into an objective, auditable process.

> A weighted scoring model provides a system for converting strategic business priorities into a structured, mathematical framework for objective decision-making.

The model’s efficacy stems from its two primary components ▴ [evaluation criteria](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-determine-the-appropriate-weighting-for-evaluation-criteria-in-an-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) and their corresponding weights. Criteria are the specific capabilities, features, or characteristics required of the vendor and their proposed solution. They span multiple domains, including technical specifications, financial viability, implementation support, and long-term partnership potential. The weights are numerical values, typically expressed as percentages, that quantify the strategic importance of each criterion.

The act of assigning these weights is a critical strategic exercise in itself, forcing the organization to confront and codify its own priorities. A high weight on ‘data security,’ for example, immediately signals its non-negotiable importance over, perhaps, a lower-weighted criterion like ‘user interface aesthetics.’ This structured approach ensures that the final decision is a direct reflection of the organization’s declared strategic intent.

![Robust metallic structures, one blue-tinted, one teal, intersect, covered in granular water droplets. This depicts a principal's institutional RFQ framework facilitating multi-leg spread execution, aggregating deep liquidity pools for optimal price discovery and high-fidelity atomic settlement of digital asset derivatives for enhanced capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-optimized-for-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

![Precision-engineered modular components display a central control, data input panel, and numerical values on cylindrical elements. This signifies an institutional Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives, enabling RFQ protocol aggregation, high-fidelity execution, algorithmic price discovery, and volatility surface calibration for portfolio margin](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/firm-fx-options-rfq-trade-system-key-microstructure-data-flow-core-engine.jpg)

## Strategy

![A precise digital asset derivatives trading mechanism, featuring transparent data conduits symbolizing RFQ protocol execution and multi-leg spread strategies. Intricate gears visualize market microstructure, ensuring high-fidelity execution and robust price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-framework.jpg)

## The Foundation of Strategic Alignment

The strategic power of a [weighted scoring](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-simple-scoring-and-weighted-scoring-in-an-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) model is realized long before the first proposal is opened. Its implementation begins with an introspective process of defining and prioritizing the very factors that will lead to a successful outcome. This initial phase moves the procurement function from a tactical purchasing activity to a strategic value-creation exercise.

The core of this strategy involves building a consensus-driven framework that aligns the entire evaluation team around a common set of goals, thereby minimizing internal friction and focusing collective effort on a unified objective. The process of developing the [scoring model](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-simple-scoring-and-weighted-scoring-in-an-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) itself becomes a mechanism for forging stakeholder agreement, ensuring that the subsequent evaluation is both efficient and strategically sound.

This alignment is achieved through a disciplined, multi-stage process. It begins with identifying a comprehensive set of evaluation criteria, then proceeds to the critical task of assigning weights that accurately reflect the organization’s strategic priorities. This is where the model’s true strategic character emerges.

The weighting process forces a deliberate and sometimes difficult conversation among stakeholders from different departments ▴ such as IT, finance, and operations ▴ compelling them to articulate and defend their priorities. The outcome of this debate is a single, unified evaluation framework that represents a negotiated consensus on what constitutes the ‘best’ solution for the organization as a whole, rather than for any single department.

![A precise RFQ engine extends into an institutional digital asset liquidity pool, symbolizing high-fidelity execution and advanced price discovery within complex market microstructure. This embodies a Principal's operational framework for multi-leg spread strategies and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-engine-interfacing-core-liquidity-system.jpg)

## Developing Comprehensive Evaluation Criteria

The quality of the decision is contingent upon the quality of the criteria against which it is measured. A robust model requires a comprehensive and well-structured set of criteria that cover all relevant aspects of the vendor’s offering and capabilities. These can be organized into logical categories to ensure complete coverage and facilitate a more structured evaluation.

- **Functional Criteria** ▴ This category assesses the core capabilities of the proposed solution. It addresses how well the product or service meets the specified business requirements. Questions here focus on features, performance metrics, scalability, and the ability to handle specific use cases central to the organization’s needs.

- **Technical Criteria** ▴ Here, the focus shifts to the underlying technology and its compatibility with the organization’s existing infrastructure. This includes an evaluation of the solution’s architecture, security protocols, data handling processes, integration capabilities via APIs, and overall system robustness.

- **Financial Criteria** ▴ This involves a thorough analysis of the [total cost of ownership](https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost-of-ownership/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). It extends beyond the initial purchase price to include implementation fees, licensing models, support costs, and any potential future expenditures. It also assesses the vendor’s financial stability and long-term viability.

- **Operational and Support Criteria** ▴ This category evaluates the vendor’s ability to support the solution post-implementation. Key considerations include the service level agreement (SLA), the quality and availability of customer support, training programs, and the vendor’s implementation methodology and track record.

- **Partnership and Vision Criteria** ▴ This forward-looking category assesses the potential for a long-term strategic relationship. It considers the vendor’s product roadmap, their commitment to innovation, their cultural fit with the organization, and the strength of their client references.

![A precision mechanical assembly: black base, intricate metallic components, luminous mint-green ring with dark spherical core. This embodies an institutional Crypto Derivatives OS, its market microstructure enabling high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols for intelligent liquidity aggregation and optimal price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-crypto-derivatives-rfq-engine-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## The Strategic Calculus of Weighting

Assigning weights to the established criteria is the most strategically significant step in the process. This is the mechanism by which the organization’s priorities are mathematically encoded into the evaluation model. A simple allocation of percentages can be effective for straightforward procurements, but more complex and high-stakes decisions may benefit from more sophisticated weighting methodologies that introduce a higher degree of analytical rigor.

> The strategic core of the model is the weighting process, which translates qualitative business priorities into a quantitative and defensible decision architecture.

The choice of weighting method itself is a strategic decision, reflecting the complexity of the procurement and the desired level of precision in the evaluation. Each method offers a different approach to capturing the relative importance of the criteria.

### Comparison of Weighting Methodologies

| Methodology | Description | Best Use Case | Level of Complexity |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Direct Percentage Allocation | Stakeholders collaboratively assign a percentage value to each criterion, with the total of all weights summing to 100%. This method is intuitive and easy to implement. | Low to medium complexity procurements where priorities are clear and stakeholder consensus is easily achieved. | Low |
| Rank-Sum Weighting | Evaluators rank all criteria in order of importance. The ranks are then used to calculate weights mathematically (e.g. a rank of 1 gets N points, a rank of 2 gets N-1 points, etc.). This forces a clear hierarchy of priorities. | Situations with a large number of criteria, where establishing a clear rank order is more intuitive than assigning specific percentages. | Medium |
| Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) | A structured technique based on pairwise comparisons. Stakeholders compare each criterion against every other criterion, one pair at a time, to determine which is more important and by how much. This reduces the cognitive load of trying to weigh all criteria simultaneously. | High-stakes, complex procurements with multiple conflicting criteria, where a high degree of analytical rigor and defensibility is required. | High |

By adopting a structured approach to weighting, an organization can ensure that the final selection is not only logical and data-driven but also a true reflection of its most critical business objectives. This transforms the [RFP evaluation](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) from a simple procurement task into a powerful exercise in strategic execution.

![A luminous digital market microstructure diagram depicts intersecting high-fidelity execution paths over a transparent liquidity pool. A central RFQ engine processes aggregated inquiries for institutional digital asset derivatives, optimizing price discovery and capital efficiency within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution-principal-operational-framework-price-discovery.jpg)

![A central engineered mechanism, resembling a Prime RFQ hub, anchors four precision arms. This symbolizes multi-leg spread execution and liquidity pool aggregation for RFQ protocols, enabling high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-framework-enabling-multi-leg-spread-strategies-for-optimized-liquidity.jpg)

## Execution

![A transparent blue sphere, symbolizing precise Price Discovery and Implied Volatility, is central to a layered Principal's Operational Framework. This structure facilitates High-Fidelity Execution and RFQ Protocol processing across diverse Aggregated Liquidity Pools, revealing the intricate Market Microstructure of Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system-microstructure-principal-framework.jpg)

## An Operational Playbook for Model Implementation

The successful execution of a weighted scoring model requires a disciplined, step-by-step process that ensures consistency, fairness, and transparency from start to finish. This operational playbook provides a structured sequence for deploying the model effectively within an organization.

- **Assemble the Evaluation Committee** ▴ The first step is to form a cross-functional team of stakeholders who will be responsible for the evaluation. This committee should include representatives from all departments affected by the procurement, such as IT, finance, legal, and the primary business users. A designated project lead should be appointed to manage the process.

- **Conduct the Strategy Workshop** ▴ The project lead facilitates a workshop with the committee. The primary objectives are to define the project’s goals, identify the key evaluation criteria, and determine the weighting for each criterion. This is the most critical phase for achieving stakeholder alignment. The chosen weighting methodology (e.g. direct allocation, AHP) is employed here.

- **Develop the Scoring Guide** ▴ To ensure consistent scoring across all evaluators, a detailed scoring guide should be created. This guide defines what each score on the rating scale (e.g. 1 to 5) means for each specific criterion. For example, for the criterion “Customer Support,” a score of 5 might be defined as “24/7 live support with a dedicated account manager,” while a score of 1 is “Email support only with a 48-hour response time.”

- **Issue the RFP** ▴ The finalized criteria and their weights should be communicated to the vendors as part of the RFP package. This transparency allows vendors to tailor their proposals to the organization’s stated priorities, resulting in higher-quality, more relevant responses.

- **Individual Evaluator Scoring** ▴ Once proposals are received, each member of the evaluation committee independently scores each proposal against the predefined criteria using the scoring guide. This independent review prevents groupthink and ensures that each evaluator’s perspective is captured without undue influence.

- **Consolidate and Calculate Scores** ▴ The project lead collects the individual scorecards and consolidates them into a [master scoring matrix](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-simple-scoring-and-weighted-scoring-in-an-rfp-matrix/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). The scores for each criterion are averaged across all evaluators to arrive at a consensus raw score. This raw score is then multiplied by the criterion’s weight to calculate the [weighted score](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-counterparty-performance-score-differ-from-a-traditional-credit-score/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). All weighted scores are summed to determine the total final score for each vendor.

- **Conduct [Sensitivity Analysis](https://prime.greeks.live/area/sensitivity-analysis/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)** ▴ Before making a final decision, the committee should analyze how the rankings might change if the weights of key criteria were adjusted. This “what-if” analysis validates the robustness of the decision and provides insight into how sensitive the outcome is to the initial weighting assumptions.

- **Final Vendor Selection and Debrief** ▴ The committee uses the final rankings and the sensitivity analysis to make a final selection. It is considered good practice to offer a debriefing session to the unsuccessful vendors, providing constructive feedback based on the evaluation criteria. This fosters goodwill and enhances the organization’s reputation in the market.

![A symmetrical, high-tech digital infrastructure depicts an institutional-grade RFQ execution hub. Luminous conduits represent aggregated liquidity for digital asset derivatives, enabling high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-system.jpg)

## Quantitative Modeling and Data Analysis

The core of the execution phase is the master [scoring matrix](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-simple-scoring-and-weighted-scoring-in-an-rfp-matrix/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). This document serves as the central repository for all evaluation data and provides a clear, auditable trail of the decision-making process. The table below illustrates a detailed scoring matrix for a hypothetical software procurement project. This level of granularity is essential for a high-stakes decision, providing a clear and defensible rationale for the final choice.

The complexity of this table is intentional; it reflects the reality of a rigorous evaluation process and showcases the model’s capacity to distill immense complexity into a single, actionable output. It is the engine of the decision-making operating system, processing diverse inputs and producing a clear, logical result.

### Master RFP Scoring Matrix ▴ Enterprise CRM Platform

| Evaluation Criteria | Category | Weight (%) | Vendor A Score (Avg) | Vendor A Weighted Score | Vendor B Score (Avg) | Vendor B Weighted Score | Vendor C Score (Avg) | Vendor C Weighted Score |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Core CRM Functionality | Functional | 15% | 4.2 | 0.63 | 4.8 | 0.72 | 3.9 | 0.59 |
| Sales Automation Features | Functional | 10% | 4.5 | 0.45 | 4.1 | 0.41 | 4.6 | 0.46 |
| System Scalability | Technical | 10% | 3.8 | 0.38 | 4.7 | 0.47 | 4.1 | 0.41 |
| Data Encryption Standards | Technical | 15% | 4.9 | 0.74 | 4.5 | 0.68 | 4.8 | 0.72 |
| API Integration Capabilities | Technical | 5% | 3.5 | 0.18 | 4.9 | 0.25 | 4.2 | 0.21 |
| Total Cost of Ownership (5-year) | Financial | 20% | 4.0 | 0.80 | 3.2 | 0.64 | 4.5 | 0.90 |
| Implementation Support | Operational | 10% | 3.7 | 0.37 | 4.6 | 0.46 | 3.5 | 0.35 |
| SLA Guarantees | Operational | 5% | 4.1 | 0.21 | 4.3 | 0.22 | 4.0 | 0.20 |
| Product Roadmap/Vision | Partnership | 5% | 3.2 | 0.16 | 4.8 | 0.24 | 3.8 | 0.19 |
| Client References | Partnership | 5% | 4.3 | 0.22 | 4.5 | 0.23 | 4.1 | 0.21 |
| Total | – | 100% | – | 4.14 | – | 4.32 | – | 4.24 |

![A dark central hub with three reflective, translucent blades extending. This represents a Principal's operational framework for digital asset derivatives, processing aggregated liquidity and multi-leg spread inquiries](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-rfq-protocol-engine-for-high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

## Predictive Scenario Analysis

A powerful feature of the weighted scoring model is its utility as a tool for predictive analysis. By adjusting the weights assigned to key criteria, the evaluation committee can run scenarios to test the stability of the outcome. This sensitivity analysis reveals how the final ranking would shift under different strategic priority sets.

For instance, if a change in budget constraints suddenly makes cost a more dominant factor, the model can instantly calculate the impact on the vendor rankings. This provides the committee with a dynamic understanding of the decision landscape and strengthens the justification for their final choice.

> Sensitivity analysis transforms the scoring model from a static evaluation tool into a dynamic system for exploring strategic alternatives.

The following table demonstrates a sensitivity analysis based on the results from the master scoring matrix above. It explores two alternative scenarios ▴ one where financial considerations become paramount, and another where technical excellence is the primary driver.

### Sensitivity Analysis of Vendor Rankings

| Scenario | Key Weight Adjustment | Vendor A Final Score | Vendor B Final Score | Vendor C Final Score | Resulting Rank |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Baseline (Original Weights) | Financial ▴ 20%, Technical ▴ 30% | 4.14 | 4.32 | 4.24 | 1. Vendor B, 2. Vendor C, 3. Vendor A |
| Scenario 1 ▴ Cost-Driven | Financial weight increased to 40%; other weights reduced proportionally. | 4.40 | 4.00 | 4.84 | 1. Vendor C, 2. Vendor A, 3. Vendor B |
| Scenario 2 ▴ Technology-Driven | Technical weight increased to 50%; other weights reduced proportionally. | 4.23 | 4.63 | 4.31 | 1. Vendor B, 2. Vendor C, 3. Vendor A |

This analysis reveals critical insights. While Vendor B wins in the baseline and technology-focused scenarios, Vendor C becomes the clear leader in a cost-driven environment. This demonstrates to the decision-makers that the “best” vendor is contingent on the strategic lens applied. Such knowledge is invaluable for making a resilient, forward-looking decision that accounts for potential shifts in organizational priorities.

![Intersecting metallic structures symbolize RFQ protocol pathways for institutional digital asset derivatives. They represent high-fidelity execution of multi-leg spreads across diverse liquidity pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-framework-optimizing-multi-leg-spreads-and-liquidity-aggregation-for-best-execution.jpg)

## References

- Cheraghi, S. H. Dadashzadeh, M. & Subramanian, M. (2004). Critical success factors for supplier selection ▴ an update. _Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR)_, 20(2).

- De Boer, L. Labro, E. & Morlacchi, P. (2001). A review of methods supporting supplier selection. _European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management_, 7(2), 75-89.

- Ho, W. Xu, X. & Dey, P. K. (2010). Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection ▴ A literature review. _European Journal of Operational Research_, 202(1), 16-24.

- Kull, T. J. & Talluri, S. (2008). A supply risk reduction model using historical supplier performance data. _IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management_, 55(3), 409-423.

- Saaty, T. L. (1980). _The Analytic Hierarchy Process ▴ Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation_. McGraw-Hill.

- Weber, C. A. Current, J. R. & Benton, W. C. (1991). Vendor selection criteria and methods. _European journal of operational research_, 50(1), 2-18.

- Tahriri, F. Osman, M. R. Ali, A. & Yusuff, R. M. (2008). A review of supplier selection methods in manufacturing industries. _Suranaree Journal of Science and Technology_, 15(3), 201-208.

- Monczka, R. M. Handfield, R. B. Giunipero, L. C. & Patterson, J. L. (2016). _Purchasing and supply chain management_. Cengage Learning.

![Internal hard drive mechanics, with a read/write head poised over a data platter, symbolize the precise, low-latency execution and high-fidelity data access vital for institutional digital asset derivatives. This embodies a Principal OS architecture supporting robust RFQ protocols, enabling atomic settlement and optimized liquidity aggregation within complex market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-precision-execution-system-microstructure.jpg)

## Reflection

![Abstract spheres and a sharp disc depict an Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives ecosystem. A central Principal's Operational Framework interacts with a Liquidity Pool via RFQ Protocol for High-Fidelity Execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-framework.jpg)

## The Architecture of Decision Integrity

Adopting a weighted scoring model is an exercise in constructing a durable architecture for decision integrity. The framework, with its defined criteria, strategic weights, and analytical outputs, provides more than a single answer to a single RFP. It establishes a repeatable, scalable, and defensible system for making critical procurement decisions. The value of this system extends beyond the immediate selection of a vendor; it permeates the organization’s culture, fostering a discipline of data-driven analysis and strategic alignment.

The process itself yields benefits. The rigorous debate required to assign weights forces an organization to achieve a rare level of clarity about its own priorities. The data generated through the evaluation becomes a valuable asset, providing a rich repository of vendor capabilities and performance metrics that can inform future sourcing strategies.

The true legacy of implementing such a model is the enhancement of the organization’s institutional capacity for making sound, strategic judgments under complex conditions. It is a fundamental upgrade to the operational chassis of the enterprise, one that builds resilience, mitigates risk, and creates a sustainable advantage in the acquisition of critical resources.

![Precision-engineered modular components, with transparent elements and metallic conduits, depict a robust RFQ Protocol engine. This architecture facilitates high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives, enabling efficient liquidity aggregation and atomic settlement within market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-optimizing-high-fidelity-execution-and-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/weighted-scoring-model/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Two dark, circular, precision-engineered components, stacked and reflecting, symbolize a Principal's Operational Framework. This layered architecture facilitates High-Fidelity Execution for Block Trades via RFQ Protocols, ensuring Atomic Settlement and Capital Efficiency within Market Microstructure for Digital Asset Derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-execution-protocol.jpg)

## Weighted Scoring Model

Meaning ▴ A Weighted Scoring Model constitutes a systematic computational framework designed to evaluate and prioritize diverse entities by assigning distinct numerical weights to a set of predefined criteria, thereby generating a composite score that reflects their aggregated importance or suitability. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-determine-the-appropriate-weighting-for-evaluation-criteria-in-an-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![An abstract geometric composition visualizes a sophisticated market microstructure for institutional digital asset derivatives. A central liquidity aggregation hub facilitates RFQ protocols and high-fidelity execution of multi-leg spreads](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/optimized-rfq-execution-framework-for-digital-asset-derivatives-trading.jpg)

## Evaluation Criteria

An RFP's evaluation criteria weighting is the strategic calibration of a decision-making architecture to deliver an optimal, defensible outcome. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-simple-scoring-and-weighted-scoring-in-an-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A central, intricate blue mechanism, evocative of an Execution Management System EMS or Prime RFQ, embodies algorithmic trading. Transparent rings signify dynamic liquidity pools and price discovery for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-framework-driving-high-fidelity-rfq-execution-and-optimized-market-microstructure-for-capital-efficiency.jpg)

## Weighted Scoring

Simple scoring offers operational ease; weighted scoring provides strategic precision by prioritizing key criteria. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-simple-scoring-and-weighted-scoring-in-an-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Geometric shapes symbolize an institutional digital asset derivatives trading ecosystem. A pyramid denotes foundational quantitative analysis and the Principal's operational framework](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system-microstructure.jpg)

## Scoring Model

Simple scoring offers operational ease; weighted scoring provides strategic precision by prioritizing key criteria. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost-of-ownership/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Intersecting concrete structures symbolize the robust Market Microstructure underpinning Institutional Grade Digital Asset Derivatives. Dynamic spheres represent Liquidity Pools and Implied Volatility](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-framework-optimizing-rfq-execution-and-liquidity-for-principal-trading.jpg)

## Total Cost of Ownership

Meaning ▴ Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) represents a comprehensive financial estimate encompassing all direct and indirect expenditures associated with an asset or system throughout its entire operational lifecycle. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A dark blue, precision-engineered blade-like instrument, representing a digital asset derivative or multi-leg spread, rests on a light foundational block, symbolizing a private quotation or block trade. This structure intersects robust teal market infrastructure rails, indicating RFQ protocol execution within a Prime RFQ for high-fidelity execution and liquidity aggregation in institutional trading](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-framework-multi-leg-spreads-best-execution-capital-efficiency.jpg)

## Rfp Evaluation

Meaning ▴ RFP Evaluation denotes the structured, systematic process undertaken by an institutional entity to assess and score vendor proposals submitted in response to a Request for Proposal, specifically for technology and services pertaining to institutional digital asset derivatives. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-simple-scoring-and-weighted-scoring-in-an-rfp-matrix/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![An angular, teal-tinted glass component precisely integrates into a metallic frame, signifying the Prime RFQ intelligence layer. This visualizes high-fidelity execution and price discovery for institutional digital asset derivatives, enabling volatility surface analysis and multi-leg spread optimization via RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocol-for-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

## Master Scoring Matrix

Simple scoring treats all RFP criteria equally; weighted scoring applies strategic importance to each, creating a more intelligent evaluation system. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-counterparty-performance-score-differ-from-a-traditional-credit-score/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Precision-engineered metallic tracks house a textured block with a central threaded aperture. This visualizes a core RFQ execution component within an institutional market microstructure, enabling private quotation for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-framework-precision-microstructure-component.jpg)

## Weighted Score

A counterparty performance score is a dynamic, multi-factor model of transactional reliability, distinct from a traditional credit score's historical debt focus. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/sensitivity-analysis/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A transparent, precisely engineered optical array rests upon a reflective dark surface, symbolizing high-fidelity execution within a Prime RFQ. Beige conduits represent latency-optimized data pipelines facilitating RFQ protocols for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-system-architecture.jpg)

## Sensitivity Analysis

Meaning ▴ Sensitivity Analysis quantifies the impact of changes in independent variables on a dependent output, providing a precise measure of model responsiveness to input perturbations. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-simple-scoring-and-weighted-scoring-in-an-rfp-matrix/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract architectural representation of a Prime RFQ for institutional digital asset derivatives, illustrating RFQ aggregation and high-fidelity execution. Intersecting beams signify multi-leg spread pathways and liquidity pools, while spheres represent atomic settlement points and implied volatility](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/architecting-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-systems-for-optimized-rfq-execution-and-advanced-price-discovery.jpg)

## Scoring Matrix

Simple scoring treats all RFP criteria equally; weighted scoring applies strategic importance to each, creating a more intelligent evaluation system. </a>

**Tags:** [Vendor Management](https://options.greeks.live/area/vendor-management/), [RFP Scoring Matrix](https://options.greeks.live/area/rfp-scoring-matrix/), [Sensitivity Analysis](https://options.greeks.live/area/sensitivity-analysis/), [Procurement Strategy](https://options.greeks.live/area/procurement-strategy/), [Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)](https://options.greeks.live/area/analytic-hierarchy-process-ahp/), [Multi-Criteria Decision Making](https://options.greeks.live/area/multi-criteria-decision-making/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [What Is the Role of Cross-Functional Teams in Defining and Weighting RFP Evaluation Criteria Effectively?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-role-of-cross-functional-teams-in-defining-and-weighting-rfp-evaluation-criteria-effectively/)
![Intersecting sleek components of a Crypto Derivatives OS symbolize RFQ Protocol for Institutional Grade Digital Asset Derivatives. Luminous internal segments represent dynamic Liquidity Pool management and Market Microstructure insights, facilitating High-Fidelity Execution for Block Trade strategies within a Prime Brokerage framework.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-engine.jpg)

A cross-functional team transforms RFP evaluation into a system for embedding strategic priorities into a quantifiable decision model.

- 
### [What Are the Most Critical Mistakes to Avoid When Weighting Rfp Evaluation Criteria?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-critical-mistakes-to-avoid-when-weighting-rfp-evaluation-criteria/)
![A central precision-engineered RFQ engine orchestrates high-fidelity execution across interconnected market microstructure. This Prime RFQ node facilitates multi-leg spread pricing and liquidity aggregation for institutional digital asset derivatives, minimizing slippage.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/high-fidelity-rfq-execution-for-institutional-crypto-derivatives.jpg)

Weighting RFP criteria is the architectural process of translating strategic intent into a defensible, data-driven procurement outcome.

- 
### [What Is the Difference between a Simple Scoring and a Weighted Scoring Model in Rfp Evaluation?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-a-simple-scoring-and-a-weighted-scoring-model-in-rfp-evaluation/)
![A multi-faceted crystalline form with sharp, radiating elements centers on a dark sphere, symbolizing complex market microstructure. This represents sophisticated RFQ protocols, aggregated inquiry, and high-fidelity execution across diverse liquidity pools, optimizing capital efficiency for institutional digital asset derivatives within a Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/rfq-protocols-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-price-discovery.jpg)

A simple scoring model tallies vendor merits equally; a weighted model calibrates scores to reflect strategic priorities.

- 
### [What Is the Difference between Simple Scoring and Weighted Scoring in an RFP Matrix?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-simple-scoring-and-weighted-scoring-in-an-rfp-matrix/)
![A sophisticated control panel, featuring concentric blue and white segments with two teal oval buttons. This embodies an institutional RFQ Protocol interface, facilitating High-Fidelity Execution for Private Quotation and Aggregated Inquiry. It represents the Prime RFQ Intelligence Layer, optimizing Capital Efficiency within complex Market Microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-rfq-protocol-interface-for-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

Simple scoring treats all RFP criteria equally; weighted scoring applies strategic importance to each, creating a more intelligent evaluation system.

- 
### [What Is the Most Effective Way to Build a Cross-Functional Rfp Evaluation Team?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-most-effective-way-to-build-a-cross-functional-rfp-evaluation-team/)
![A sleek conduit, embodying an RFQ protocol and smart order routing, connects two distinct, semi-spherical liquidity pools. Its transparent core signifies an intelligence layer for algorithmic trading and high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives, ensuring atomic settlement.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-engine-bridging-diverse-liquidity-pools-via-high-fidelity-rfq-protocol-orchestration.jpg)

A cross-functional RFP team is an analytical engine designed to de-risk procurement by synthesizing diverse expertise into a single, defensible decision.

- 
### [How Should Stakeholders from Different Departments Collaborate to Define Rfp Evaluation Criteria?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-should-stakeholders-from-different-departments-collaborate-to-define-rfp-evaluation-criteria/)
![A precise metallic cross, symbolizing principal trading and multi-leg spread structures, rests on a dark, reflective market microstructure surface. Glowing algorithmic trading pathways illustrate high-fidelity execution and latency optimization for institutional digital asset derivatives via private quotation.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-architecture.jpg)

A structured, cross-departmental collaboration to define weighted RFP criteria transforms procurement into a strategic, data-driven system.

- 
### [How Do You Create an Effective Weighted Scoring Model for Evaluating Rfp Responses?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-create-an-effective-weighted-scoring-model-for-evaluating-rfp-responses/)
![Abstract forms on dark, a sphere balanced by intersecting planes. This signifies high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives, embodying RFQ protocols and price discovery within a Prime RFQ. It represents market microstructure, managing latent liquidity and counterparty risk for block trades.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-platform-microstructure-execution-prime-os.jpg)

A weighted scoring model is a decision-making system that translates strategic priorities into a quantitative, defensible vendor selection.

- 
### [What Is the Recommended Percentage Weight for Price in a Strategic Sourcing Rfp Rubric?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-recommended-percentage-weight-for-price-in-a-strategic-sourcing-rfp-rubric/)
![A precision digital token, subtly green with a '0' marker, meticulously engages a sleek, white institutional-grade platform. This symbolizes secure RFQ protocol initiation for high-fidelity execution of complex multi-leg spread strategies, optimizing portfolio margin and capital efficiency within a Principal's Crypto Derivatives OS.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-platform-secure-rfq-protocol-initiation-for-optimal-block-trade-execution.jpg)

The weight for price in an RFP rubric is a dynamic output of a strategic analysis, not a fixed input.

- 
### [What Are the Most Critical Components of a Defensible RFP Evaluation Matrix?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-critical-components-of-a-defensible-rfp-evaluation-matrix/)
![A sophisticated apparatus, potentially a price discovery or volatility surface calibration tool. A blue needle with sphere and clamp symbolizes high-fidelity execution pathways and RFQ protocol integration within a Prime RFQ. This signifies precise algorithmic trading and risk management for digital asset derivatives, optimizing capital efficiency in market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocol-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

A defensible RFP evaluation matrix is a calibrated system for translating strategic priorities into a quantifiable, auditable, and objective procurement decision.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "How Does a Weighted Scoring Model Improve the RFP Evaluation Process?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-weighted-scoring-model-improve-the-rfp-evaluation-process/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-weighted-scoring-model-improve-the-rfp-evaluation-process/"
    },
    "headline": "How Does a Weighted Scoring Model Improve the RFP Evaluation Process? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "A weighted scoring model improves RFP evaluations by architecting a data-driven, auditable system that translates strategic priorities into a quantifiable framework. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-weighted-scoring-model-improve-the-rfp-evaluation-process/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-09T16:52:39+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-08-09T16:52:44+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-interface-optimization.jpg",
        "caption": "This abstract composition articulates institutional digital asset derivatives trading. Integrated system components, precisely aligned, embody a Principal's operational framework for RFQ protocol execution. Circular elements symbolize critical market data feeds and advanced price discovery capabilities. The sharp, curved feature represents high-fidelity execution, liquidity provision, and strategic multi-leg spread trading, ensuring capital efficiency within a robust Prime RFQ."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)",
        "Decision-Making Framework",
        "Multi-Criteria Decision Making",
        "Procurement Process",
        "Procurement Strategy",
        "RFP Evaluation",
        "RFP Scoring Matrix",
        "Sensitivity Analysis",
        "Strategic Sourcing",
        "Supplier Selection",
        "Total Cost of Ownership",
        "Vendor Management",
        "Weighted Scoring Model"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-weighted-scoring-model-improve-the-rfp-evaluation-process/
