# How Does MiFID II Define Best Execution Differently from FINRA? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-05
**Categories:** Question

---

![A sleek, bimodal digital asset derivatives execution interface, partially open, revealing a dark, secure internal structure. This symbolizes high-fidelity execution and strategic price discovery via institutional RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-price-discovery.jpg)

![A precision mechanism with a central circular core and a linear element extending to a sharp tip, encased in translucent material. This symbolizes an institutional RFQ protocol's market microstructure, enabling high-fidelity execution and price discovery for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-microstructure-facilitating-optimal-price-discovery-and-best-execution.jpg)

## Concept

An examination of best execution frameworks reveals a fundamental divergence in regulatory architecture between the European Union’s Markets in [Financial Instruments](https://prime.greeks.live/area/financial-instruments/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) Directive II (MiFID II) and the United States’ [Financial Industry Regulatory Authority](https://prime.greeks.live/area/financial-industry-regulatory-authority/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (FINRA) rules. This is a distinction in systemic design philosophy. MiFID II represents a highly prescriptive, data-centric, and demonstrably evidential system.

It mandates that [investment firms](https://prime.greeks.live/area/investment-firms/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) construct and operate a verifiable process to achieve the optimal outcome for a client. In contrast, FINRA’s framework is built upon a principles-based foundation, emphasizing a duty of “[reasonable diligence](https://prime.greeks.live/area/reasonable-diligence/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite).” This approach provides firms with greater flexibility in their methodology, contingent upon their ability to justify their actions within the context of prevailing market conditions.

From a systems architecture perspective, MiFID II is engineered to function as a transparent, auditable machine. It compels firms to not only design an effective execution policy but also to continuously gather data, monitor performance, and publicly disclose granular details of their [execution quality](https://prime.greeks.live/area/execution-quality/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). The directive’s requirement for firms to take “[all sufficient steps](https://prime.greeks.live/area/all-sufficient-steps/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)” moves the obligation beyond simple effort.

It demands the creation of a systematic, evidence-based feedback loop where execution data is captured, analyzed, and used to refine the process. This creates a system where the burden of proof is placed squarely on the firm to demonstrate, through quantitative evidence, that its execution architecture is operating optimally for its clients across a wide array of factors.

> The core architectural difference lies in MiFID II’s mandate for a provable, data-driven process versus FINRA’s principles-based requirement for justifiable diligence.

FINRA’s Rule 5310, which governs [best execution](https://prime.greeks.live/area/best-execution/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), establishes a fiduciary-like duty that requires a [broker-dealer](https://prime.greeks.live/area/broker-dealer/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) to use reasonable diligence to ascertain the best market for a security and trade in that market to achieve a price that is as favorable as possible for the customer. The term “reasonable diligence” is the operational core of this framework. It implies a standard of care that a prudent broker would exercise, considering the facts and circumstances at the time of the order.

This system is less about mandating a specific set of procedures or data disclosures and more about ensuring the firm’s decision-making process is sound, defensible, and consistently aimed at the client’s best interest. The focus is on the integrity of the broker’s judgment and the qualitative process of seeking advantageous terms, with less emphasis on a mandated, uniform quantitative reporting structure comparable to that of [MiFID II](https://prime.greeks.live/area/mifid-ii/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite).

This architectural variance has profound implications for a firm’s operational design. A firm operating [under MiFID](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-specific-data-reporting-requirements-for-execution-venues-under-mifid-ii-rts-27/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) II must build a technological and procedural infrastructure capable of capturing vast amounts of data, performing complex analytics for venue selection, and generating detailed public reports like the [RTS 27](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rts-27/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) and RTS 28 disclosures. The system is designed for ex-post verification.

A firm under [FINRA](https://prime.greeks.live/area/finra/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)’s jurisdiction must build a robust compliance and supervision framework that can document and defend its execution decisions on a qualitative and case-by-case basis, demonstrating that its diligence was appropriate for each order. While both systems aim to protect investors, their design principles guide firms toward different operational priorities ▴ MiFID II toward quantitative proof and transparency, and FINRA toward qualitative reasonableness and procedural soundness.

![A precision-engineered metallic cross-structure, embodying an RFQ engine's market microstructure, showcases diverse elements. One granular arm signifies aggregated liquidity pools and latent liquidity](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-rfq-engine-microstructure-for-atomic-settlement.jpg)

![Dark precision apparatus with reflective spheres, central unit, parallel rails. Visualizes institutional-grade Crypto Derivatives OS for RFQ block trade execution, driving liquidity aggregation and algorithmic price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-system.jpg)

## Strategy

Developing a global execution strategy requires a deep understanding of the distinct obligations imposed by MiFID II and FINRA. The strategic frameworks are shaped by the differing scopes, [execution factors](https://prime.greeks.live/area/execution-factors/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), and client considerations embedded in each regulation. A firm’s approach must be calibrated to these specific requirements, moving beyond a one-size-fits-all model to a nuanced, jurisdiction-specific execution architecture.

![Sleek, metallic components with reflective blue surfaces depict an advanced institutional RFQ protocol. Its central pivot and radiating arms symbolize aggregated inquiry for multi-leg spread execution, optimizing order book dynamics](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-microstructure-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

## How Does the Scope of the Mandates Differ?

A primary strategic divergence is the scope of financial instruments covered. FINRA’s [Rule 5310](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rule-5310/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) has historically been focused on equities and has been interpreted to apply to other securities like fixed income. MiFID II, from its inception, was designed with a far broader and more explicit reach. It applies to a wide range of financial instruments, including equities, bonds, derivatives (both exchange-traded and over-the-counter), and other structured products.

This necessitates a more comprehensive strategic approach for firms operating under MiFID II, as their best execution policy must be designed and implemented across a diverse and complex set of asset classes, each with unique market structures and liquidity profiles. For instance, designing a best execution framework for illiquid OTC derivatives under MiFID II requires a different set of tools and data sources, such as relying on proxy instruments or internal valuation models for benchmarking, compared to executing a liquid equity trade.

![Abstract visualization of institutional RFQ protocol for digital asset derivatives. Translucent layers symbolize dark liquidity pools within complex market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine-6.jpg)

## Comparative Analysis of Execution Factors

While both regimes acknowledge a range of factors beyond just price, MiFID II codifies them more explicitly, forcing a more structured and multi-dimensional analysis in the firm’s execution policy. The directive elevates the consideration of cost, speed, and likelihood of execution to the same level of importance as price, depending on the client’s objectives.

The table below provides a comparative analysis of the primary execution factors under each regulatory system.

| Execution Factor | MiFID II Approach | FINRA Approach |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Price | A critical component, but must be considered in the context of total consideration, which includes all costs associated with execution. | Historically the primary factor, representing the duty to get the most favorable price possible under prevailing market conditions. |
| Costs | Explicitly defined and must be considered. This includes all expenses incurred by the client, such as execution venue fees, clearing and settlement fees, and any other charges passed on to the client. | Considered as part of achieving a favorable price. The focus is on the net price to the customer, though the explicit itemization of costs is less prescriptive than under MiFID II. |
| Speed of Execution | An explicit, co-equal factor to be weighed based on the client’s priorities and the nature of the order. A firm must justify its choice of a slower venue if it provides a better overall result. | A relevant factor, particularly in fast-moving markets. The diligence standard requires brokers to consider how the speed of a particular venue could affect the execution price. |
| Likelihood of Execution and Settlement | A key consideration, especially for large or illiquid orders. The firm’s policy must account for the probability of a trade being successfully executed and settled on a chosen venue. | Implicit in the duty of diligence. A broker must consider the reliability of a market center to avoid failed trades or settlement issues that would harm the client. |
| Size and Nature of the Order | Explicitly listed as a factor. The strategy for a large block order that could cause market impact will be different from that for a small retail order. | A key consideration under the “facts and circumstances” analysis. The broker’s diligence must be appropriate for the size and type of the transaction. |

![A sleek Execution Management System diagonally spans segmented Market Microstructure, representing Prime RFQ for Institutional Grade Digital Asset Derivatives. It rests on two distinct Liquidity Pools, one facilitating RFQ Block Trade Price Discovery, the other a Dark Pool for Private Quotation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-optimizing-rfq-protocols-across-segmented-liquidity-pools.jpg)

## Client Classification and Order Characteristics

MiFID II introduces a formal system of [client classification](https://prime.greeks.live/area/client-classification/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (Retail, Professional, and Eligible Counterparty) that directly impacts the best execution obligations. The highest level of protection is owed to retail clients. For these clients, the best possible result must be determined in terms of the total consideration, representing the price of the financial instrument and the costs related to execution.

For professional clients, other factors like speed or likelihood of execution can be prioritized if the client provides instructions to that effect. This creates a tiered system of obligation that must be built into the firm’s order handling and execution logic.

> MiFID II’s formal client classification system creates a tiered obligation structure that must be systematically embedded within a firm’s order management and execution logic.

FINRA’s framework, while also requiring consideration of the customer’s instructions, is less prescriptive in its formal classification. The “reasonable diligence” standard applies broadly, with the expectation that a broker will consider the specific nature and terms of a customer’s order. The emphasis is on the broker’s professional judgment in light of the order’s characteristics, rather than a rigid, pre-defined client category dictating the precise weighting of execution factors.

This leads to different strategic imperatives:

- **MiFID II Strategy** ▴ Requires building a system that can automatically recognize the client category, apply the correct execution factor weighting, and document the rationale, particularly when deviating from a total consideration-based analysis for professional clients. The strategy is one of systematic compliance and evidence generation.

- **FINRA Strategy** ▴ Requires a strategy focused on robust training, supervision, and documentation to ensure that brokers consistently exercise and can demonstrate sound judgment. The focus is on creating a defensible process of inquiry and decision-making for every order.

![A metallic circular interface, segmented by a prominent 'X' with a luminous central core, visually represents an institutional RFQ protocol. This depicts precise market microstructure, enabling high-fidelity execution for multi-leg spread digital asset derivatives, optimizing capital efficiency across diverse liquidity pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure.jpg)

![A sleek blue and white mechanism with a focused lens symbolizes Pre-Trade Analytics for Digital Asset Derivatives. A glowing turquoise sphere represents a Block Trade within a Liquidity Pool, demonstrating High-Fidelity Execution via RFQ protocol for Price Discovery in Dark Pool Market Microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/advanced-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system-for-optimal-price-discovery-and-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Execution

The operational execution of best execution policies under MiFID II and FINRA reveals the most significant architectural differences between the two regimes. The divergence is most pronounced in the areas of data collection, public disclosure, and the technological infrastructure required to support compliance. MiFID II’s mandate for “all [sufficient steps](https://prime.greeks.live/area/sufficient-steps/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)” translates into a set of highly specific, data-intensive reporting requirements that have no direct equivalent in the FINRA framework.

![An exposed institutional digital asset derivatives engine reveals its market microstructure. The polished disc represents a liquidity pool for price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system.jpg)

## What Are the Core Reporting and Disclosure Differences?

The operational centerpiece of MiFID II’s best execution framework is its detailed reporting regime, specifically the requirements outlined in [Regulatory Technical Standards](https://prime.greeks.live/area/regulatory-technical-standards/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (RTS) 27 and 28. These reports are designed to bring unprecedented transparency to execution quality and venue selection.

- **RTS 27 Reports** ▴ [Execution venues](https://prime.greeks.live/area/execution-venues/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (such as exchanges, multilateral trading facilities, and systematic internalisers) are required to publish quarterly reports providing detailed data on execution quality. This data includes information on price, costs, speed, and likelihood of execution for individual financial instruments. The goal is to provide investment firms with standardized data to compare the performance of different venues.

- **[RTS 28](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rts-28/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) Reports** ▴ Investment firms that execute client orders must publish annual reports detailing the top five execution venues they used for each class of financial instruments. Alongside this quantitative data, firms must provide a qualitative summary of the execution quality obtained and how they monitored and verified that they provided best execution to their clients.

FINRA’s regime, while requiring firms to have procedures for reviewing their execution quality, is far less prescriptive in its public disclosure mandates. The primary comparable requirement is the SEC’s Rule 606, which requires broker-dealers to disclose information about their [order routing](https://prime.greeks.live/area/order-routing/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) practices. However, Rule 606 reports have historically provided less granular detail than the RTS 27/28 reports, focusing on [payment for order flow](https://prime.greeks.live/area/payment-for-order-flow/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) and the venues to which non-directed orders are routed.

> The operational burden of MiFID II is defined by its prescriptive RTS 27 and RTS 28 reporting, which demands a far more sophisticated data infrastructure than FINRA’s principles-based review process.

The following table outlines the key operational differences in the execution and reporting of best execution.

| Operational Aspect | MiFID II Execution | FINRA Execution |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Data Collection | Mandates systematic, high-frequency data capture on execution quality for every relevant trade. Firms must ingest and process RTS 27 data from venues to inform their venue analysis. | Requires firms to have a process to review execution quality. Data collection is driven by the firm’s internal review methodology rather than a specific regulatory mandate for public data formats. |
| Public Disclosure | Requires annual, detailed public reports (RTS 28) on top five venues, including a summary of the analysis and conclusions from the firm’s monitoring of execution quality. | Requires quarterly reports on order routing (Rule 606). The scope and detail are generally less extensive than RTS 28, with a focus on payment for order flow arrangements. |
| Venue Analysis | Requires a demonstrable, data-driven process for selecting and monitoring execution venues. Firms must show evidence that they have used the available data (including RTS 27) to make optimal choices for clients. | Requires “regular and rigorous” reviews of execution quality. The methodology is less prescribed, allowing firms more flexibility in how they conduct and document their venue analysis. |
| Technological Infrastructure | Necessitates a significant investment in technology for data storage, analytics (Transaction Cost Analysis – TCA), and automated report generation to handle the volume and complexity of RTS 27/28 data. | Requires systems for compliance and supervision to document the “reasonable diligence” process. While technology is used, the mandate for a specific data analytics and reporting architecture is less severe. |

![Abstract system interface on a global data sphere, illustrating a sophisticated RFQ protocol for institutional digital asset derivatives. The glowing circuits represent market microstructure and high-fidelity execution within a Prime RFQ intelligence layer, facilitating price discovery and capital efficiency across liquidity pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-prime-os.jpg)

## The Role of Transaction Cost Analysis TCA

Under MiFID II, [Transaction Cost Analysis](https://prime.greeks.live/area/transaction-cost-analysis/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (TCA) evolves from a best practice into a core component of the execution and compliance workflow. The need to provide evidence of “all sufficient steps” makes sophisticated TCA essential. Firms must use TCA to:

- **Demonstrate Diligence** ▴ Provide quantitative proof that the chosen execution strategy and venue were optimal under the circumstances.

- **Monitor Venues** ▴ Continuously analyze execution quality across different venues using the data provided in RTS 27 reports and their own internal data.

- **Refine Policies** ▴ Use the output of TCA to identify weaknesses in their execution process and make systematic improvements to their order routing logic and execution policies.

Within the FINRA framework, TCA is also a valuable tool for demonstrating “reasonable diligence.” However, its application is driven more by industry best practice and the firm’s own desire for efficiency and proof of prudence. There is no explicit regulatory mandate that prescribes the use of TCA in the same way that the structure of MiFID II’s reporting requirements implicitly does. The execution of a “regular and rigorous review” under FINRA rules can take many forms, and while TCA is a powerful method, it is one of several potential tools a firm might use to meet its obligations.

![A precise optical sensor within an institutional-grade execution management system, representing a Prime RFQ intelligence layer. This enables high-fidelity execution and price discovery for digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols, ensuring atomic settlement within market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-high-fidelity-institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-system-lens.jpg)

## How Does This Impact Operational Architecture?

Ultimately, a firm’s operational architecture must be designed to meet the specific demands of its regulatory environment. For a global firm, this means building a system with the flexibility to accommodate both the prescriptive, data-heavy requirements of MiFID II and the principles-based, judgment-oriented approach of FINRA. This might involve a modular design, where a core execution management system (EMS) is supplemented with jurisdiction-specific modules for compliance monitoring, data analytics, and reporting. The system must be capable of applying different rule sets and logic based on the origin of the order and the client it belongs to, ensuring that the correct standard of care and evidence is applied automatically and reliably.

![Intersecting metallic components symbolize an institutional RFQ Protocol framework. This system enables High-Fidelity Execution and Atomic Settlement for Digital Asset Derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-system-specialists.jpg)

## References

- 
European Securities and Markets Authority. “Questions and Answers on MiFID II and MiFIR investor protection and intermediaries topics.” ESMA35-43-349, 2023.

- 
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. “FINRA Rule 5310. Best Execution and Interpositioning.” FINRA Manual, 2023.

- 
Harris, Larry. “Trading and Exchanges ▴ Market Microstructure for Practitioners.” Oxford University Press, 2003.

- 
European Parliament and Council. “Directive 2014/65/EU on markets in financial instruments (MiFID II).” Official Journal of the European Union, 2014.

- 
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. “Regulation NMS.” SEC Release No. 34-51808, 2005.

- 
Lehalle, Charles-Albert, and Sophie Laruelle, editors. “Market Microstructure in Practice.” World Scientific Publishing, 2018.

- 
O’Hara, Maureen. “Market Microstructure Theory.” Blackwell Publishers, 1995.

- 
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/575 (RTS 27). “Supplementing Directive 2014/65/EU on markets in financial instruments with regard to regulatory technical standards for the data to be published by execution venues on the quality of execution of transactions.” 2017.

- 
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/576 (RTS 28). “Supplementing Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards for the annual publication by investment firms of information on the identity of execution venues and on the quality of execution.” 2017.

![A teal-blue disk, symbolizing a liquidity pool for digital asset derivatives, is intersected by a bar. This represents an RFQ protocol or block trade, detailing high-fidelity execution pathways](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-digital-asset-execution.jpg)

## Reflection

The examination of MiFID II and FINRA’s best execution regimes moves beyond a simple regulatory comparison. It prompts a deeper introspection into a firm’s own operational architecture. Viewing these regulations as distinct system designs ▴ one prioritizing prescriptive transparency, the other principled diligence ▴ forces a critical question ▴ is your execution framework merely compliant, or is it architected for a demonstrable, strategic advantage? The knowledge of these differences is a component part of a larger intelligence system.

The ultimate goal is to construct a global execution capability that is not only resilient to regulatory fragmentation but is engineered to transform that complexity into superior performance and capital efficiency. The true edge lies in building a system that can fluidly navigate both the demand for quantitative proof and the standard of qualitative prudence.

![A sleek, metallic multi-lens device with glowing blue apertures symbolizes an advanced RFQ protocol engine. Its precision optics enable real-time market microstructure analysis and high-fidelity execution, facilitating automated price discovery and aggregated inquiry within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-intelligence-layer.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/financial-industry-regulatory-authority/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Two reflective, disc-like structures, one tilted, one flat, symbolize the Market Microstructure of Digital Asset Derivatives. This metaphor encapsulates RFQ Protocols and High-Fidelity Execution within a Liquidity Pool for Price Discovery, vital for a Principal's Operational Framework ensuring Atomic Settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-execution-liquidity-aggregation-optimizing-market-microstructure-principal-trading-best-execution-atomic-settlement.jpg)

## Financial Industry Regulatory Authority

Meaning ▴ The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, commonly known as FINRA, operates as the largest independent regulator for all securities firms conducting business with the public in the United States. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/financial-instruments/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, institutional-grade Prime RFQ component features intersecting transparent blades with a glowing core. This visualizes a precise RFQ execution engine, enabling high-fidelity execution and dynamic price discovery for digital asset derivatives, optimizing market microstructure for capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-for-best-execution-microstructure.jpg)

## Financial Instruments

Meaning ▴ Financial instruments represent codified contractual agreements that establish specific claims, obligations, or rights concerning the transfer of economic value or risk between parties. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/reasonable-diligence/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A central rod, symbolizing an RFQ inquiry, links distinct liquidity pools and market makers. A transparent disc, an execution venue, facilitates price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-protocol-execution-optimization.jpg)

## Reasonable Diligence

Meaning ▴ Reasonable Diligence denotes the systematic and prudent level of investigation and care an institutional participant is expected to undertake to identify, assess, and mitigate risks associated with financial transactions, market participants, and operational processes within the digital asset ecosystem. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/investment-firms/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A central mechanism of an Institutional Grade Crypto Derivatives OS with dynamically rotating arms. These translucent blue panels symbolize High-Fidelity Execution via an RFQ Protocol, facilitating Price Discovery and Liquidity Aggregation for Digital Asset Derivatives within complex Market Microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-engine-for-digital-asset-derivatives-best-execution.jpg)

## Investment Firms

Meaning ▴ Investment Firms are institutional entities primarily engaged in the management, deployment, and intermediation of capital within financial markets, operating as critical nodes in the global capital allocation network. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/all-sufficient-steps/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Sleek metallic components with teal luminescence precisely intersect, symbolizing an institutional-grade Prime RFQ. This represents multi-leg spread execution for digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols, ensuring high-fidelity execution, optimal price discovery, and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-best-execution-system.jpg)

## All Sufficient Steps

Meaning ▴ All Sufficient Steps denotes a design principle and operational mandate within a system where every component or process is engineered to autonomously achieve its defined objective without requiring external intervention or additional inputs beyond its initial parameters. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/execution-quality/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sophisticated, illuminated device representing an Institutional Grade Prime RFQ for Digital Asset Derivatives. Its glowing interface indicates active RFQ protocol execution, displaying high-fidelity execution status and price discovery for block trades](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-rfq-engine-for-digital-asset-derivatives-best-execution-1.jpg)

## Execution Quality

Meaning ▴ Execution Quality quantifies the efficacy of an order's fill, assessing how closely the achieved trade price aligns with the prevailing market price at submission, alongside consideration for speed, cost, and market impact. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/best-execution/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precision-engineered metallic and glass system depicts the core of an Institutional Grade Prime RFQ, facilitating high-fidelity execution for Digital Asset Derivatives. Transparent layers represent visible liquidity pools and the intricate market microstructure supporting RFQ protocol processing, ensuring atomic settlement capabilities](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/robust-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-platform-for-optimized-rfq-protocol-execution-and-deep-liquidity-access.jpg)

## Best Execution

Meaning ▴ Best Execution is the obligation to obtain the most favorable terms reasonably available for a client's order. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/broker-dealer/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A central processing core with intersecting, transparent structures revealing intricate internal components and blue data flows. This symbolizes an institutional digital asset derivatives platform's Prime RFQ, orchestrating high-fidelity execution, managing aggregated RFQ inquiries, and ensuring atomic settlement within dynamic market microstructure, optimizing capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-system-facilitating-high-fidelity-rfq-protocol-optimization-for-best-execution-and-atomic-settlement.jpg)

## Broker-Dealer

Meaning ▴ A Broker-Dealer is a financial entity operating under regulatory oversight that performs two distinct functions ▴ executing securities trades on behalf of clients (brokerage) and trading for its own account (dealing). </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/mifid-ii/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek Principal's Operational Framework connects to a glowing, intricate teal ring structure. This depicts an institutional-grade RFQ protocol engine, facilitating high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives, enabling private quotation and optimal price discovery within market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-execution-engine-for-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq.jpg)

## Mifid Ii

Meaning ▴ MiFID II, the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II, constitutes a comprehensive regulatory framework enacted by the European Union to govern financial markets, investment firms, and trading venues. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-specific-data-reporting-requirements-for-execution-venues-under-mifid-ii-rts-27/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A stylized RFQ protocol engine, featuring a central price discovery mechanism and a high-fidelity execution blade. Translucent blue conduits symbolize atomic settlement pathways for institutional block trades within a Crypto Derivatives OS, ensuring capital efficiency and best execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-rfq-execution-for-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

## Under Mifid

RTS 27 mandates that execution venues publish granular, quarterly reports on price, cost, speed, and likelihood of execution. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rts-27/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Smooth, glossy, multi-colored discs stack irregularly, topped by a dome. This embodies institutional digital asset derivatives market microstructure, with RFQ protocols facilitating aggregated inquiry for multi-leg spread execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-for-prime-os-best-execution.jpg)

## Rts 27

Meaning ▴ RTS 27 mandates that investment firms and market operators publish detailed data on the quality of execution of transactions on their venues. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/finra/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A stylized spherical system, symbolizing an institutional digital asset derivative, rests on a robust Prime RFQ base. Its dark core represents a deep liquidity pool for algorithmic trading](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-grade-rfq-protocol-engine-facilitating-best-execution-and-liquidity-aggregation-for-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

## Finra

Meaning ▴ FINRA, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, functions as the largest independent regulator for all securities firms conducting business in the United States. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/execution-factors/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![An institutional grade system component, featuring a reflective intelligence layer lens, symbolizes high-fidelity execution and market microstructure insight. This enables price discovery for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-precision-rfq-execution-system-interface.jpg)

## Execution Factors

Meaning ▴ Execution Factors are the quantifiable, dynamic variables that directly influence the outcome and quality of a trade execution within institutional digital asset markets. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rule-5310/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A multifaceted, luminous abstract structure against a dark void, symbolizing institutional digital asset derivatives market microstructure. Its sharp, reflective surfaces embody high-fidelity execution, RFQ protocol efficiency, and precise price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-protocol-architecture-optimizing-high-fidelity-rfq-execution-and-latent-liquidity-discovery.jpg)

## Rule 5310

Meaning ▴ Rule 5310 mandates that registered persons provide written notice to their firm regarding any outside business activities, allowing the firm to assess and approve or disapprove such engagements. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/client-classification/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precision-engineered teal metallic mechanism, featuring springs and rods, connects to a light U-shaped interface. This represents a core RFQ protocol component enabling automated price discovery and high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/rfq-execution-engine-component-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

## Client Classification

Meaning ▴ Client Classification defines the structured categorization of institutional principals based on specific, predefined attributes, such as trading volume, asset class focus, risk tolerance, regulatory status, or strategic objectives within the institutional digital asset derivatives ecosystem. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/sufficient-steps/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A central blue sphere, representing a Liquidity Pool, balances on a white dome, the Prime RFQ. Perpendicular beige and teal arms, embodying RFQ protocols and Multi-Leg Spread strategies, extend to four peripheral blue elements](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-framework.jpg)

## Sufficient Steps

Meaning ▴ Sufficient Steps constitute the minimum, verifiable sequence of operations required to achieve a defined, deterministic outcome within a financial protocol or system, ensuring operational closure and state transition. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/regulatory-technical-standards/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, multi-layered platform with a reflective blue dome represents an institutional grade Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives. The glowing interstice symbolizes atomic settlement and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/optimized-rfq-protocol-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-1.jpg)

## Regulatory Technical Standards

Meaning ▴ Regulatory Technical Standards, or RTS, are legally binding technical specifications developed by European Supervisory Authorities to elaborate on the details of legislative acts within the European Union's financial services framework. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/execution-venues/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Precision-engineered modular components display a central control, data input panel, and numerical values on cylindrical elements. This signifies an institutional Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives, enabling RFQ protocol aggregation, high-fidelity execution, algorithmic price discovery, and volatility surface calibration for portfolio margin](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/firm-fx-options-rfq-trade-system-key-microstructure-data-flow-core-engine.jpg)

## Execution Venues

Meaning ▴ Execution Venues are regulated marketplaces or bilateral platforms where financial instruments are traded and orders are matched, encompassing exchanges, multilateral trading facilities, organized trading facilities, and over-the-counter desks. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rts-28/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A transparent, multi-faceted component, indicative of an RFQ engine's intricate market microstructure logic, emerges from complex FIX Protocol connectivity. Its sharp edges signify high-fidelity execution and price discovery precision for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimized-for-best-execution.jpg)

## Rts 28

Meaning ▴ RTS 28 refers to Regulatory Technical Standard 28 under MiFID II, which mandates investment firms and market operators to publish annual reports on the quality of execution of transactions on trading venues and for financial instruments. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/payment-for-order-flow/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek green probe, symbolizing a precise RFQ protocol, engages a dark, textured execution venue, representing a digital asset derivatives liquidity pool. This signifies institutional-grade price discovery and high-fidelity execution through an advanced Prime RFQ, minimizing slippage and optimizing capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-integration-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-institutional-liquidity-aggregation-on-prime-os.jpg)

## Payment for Order Flow

Meaning ▴ Payment for Order Flow (PFOF) designates the financial compensation received by a broker-dealer from a market maker or wholesale liquidity provider in exchange for directing client order flow to them for execution. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/order-routing/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, metallic algorithmic trading component with a central circular mechanism rests on angular, multi-colored reflective surfaces, symbolizing sophisticated RFQ protocols, aggregated liquidity, and high-fidelity execution within institutional digital asset derivatives market microstructure. This represents the intelligence layer of a Prime RFQ for optimal price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-system-architecture-for-optimal-price-discovery-and-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Order Routing

Meaning ▴ Order Routing is the automated process by which a trading order is directed from its origination point to a specific execution venue or liquidity source. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/transaction-cost-analysis/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract layers in grey, mint green, and deep blue visualize a Principal's operational framework for institutional digital asset derivatives. The textured grey signifies market microstructure, while the mint green layer with precise slots represents RFQ protocol parameters, enabling high-fidelity execution, private quotation, capital efficiency, and atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-layered-rfq-protocol-for-digital-asset-execution-system.jpg)

## Transaction Cost Analysis

Meaning ▴ Transaction Cost Analysis (TCA) is the quantitative methodology for assessing the explicit and implicit costs incurred during the execution of financial trades. </a>

**Tags:** [Execution Venues](https://options.greeks.live/area/execution-venues/), [Broker-Dealer](https://options.greeks.live/area/broker-dealer/), [Payment for Order Flow](https://options.greeks.live/area/payment-for-order-flow/), [Investment Firms](https://options.greeks.live/area/investment-firms/), [Investment Firm](https://options.greeks.live/area/investment-firm/), [RTS 27](https://options.greeks.live/area/rts-27/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [What Are the Regulatory Implications of Failing to Use Peer Data for Best Execution?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-regulatory-implications-of-failing-to-use-peer-data-for-best-execution/)
![A sleek, futuristic apparatus featuring a central spherical processing unit flanked by dual reflective surfaces and illuminated data conduits. This system visually represents an advanced RFQ protocol engine facilitating high-fidelity execution and liquidity aggregation for institutional digital asset derivatives. It embodies precise price discovery, multi-leg spread processing, and atomic settlement within a Prime RFQ framework.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-options-rfq-liquidity-aggregation-interface.jpg)

Failing to use peer data for best execution constitutes a breach of regulatory duty by rendering a firm unable to prove its execution process is effective.

- 
### [How Do Regulatory Frameworks like MiFID II and FINRA Define Best Execution?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-regulatory-frameworks-like-mifid-ii-and-finra-define-best-execution/)
![Stacked, distinct components, subtly tilted, symbolize the multi-tiered institutional digital asset derivatives architecture. Layers represent RFQ protocols, private quotation aggregation, core liquidity pools, and atomic settlement. This design optimizes market microstructure for high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/layered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-optimizing-principal-execution-management-systems-for-best-execution.jpg)

MiFID II and FINRA define best execution as a continuous, evidence-based process for optimizing client outcomes, not a single event.

- 
### [How Do the Best Execution Requirements for Otc Derivatives under Mifid Ii Differ from Those in Other Jurisdictions?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-the-best-execution-requirements-for-otc-derivatives-under-mifid-ii-differ-from-those-in-other-jurisdictions/)
![A transparent sphere, representing a digital asset option, rests on an aqua geometric RFQ execution venue. This proprietary liquidity pool integrates with an opaque institutional grade infrastructure, depicting high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement within a Principal's operational framework for Crypto Derivatives OS.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system-prime-os.jpg)

MiFID II's data-centric "all sufficient steps" standard for OTC derivatives demands a more robust operational framework than the principles-based "reasonable diligence" approach in the U.S.

- 
### [How Did MiFID II’s Best Execution Standard Change Fixed Income Trading?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-did-mifid-iis-best-execution-standard-change-fixed-income-trading/)
![A polished, dark teal institutional-grade mechanism reveals an internal beige interface, precisely deploying a metallic, arrow-etched component. This signifies high-fidelity execution within an RFQ protocol, enabling atomic settlement and optimized price discovery for institutional digital asset derivatives and multi-leg spreads, ensuring minimal slippage and robust capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/quantitative-finance-driven-rfq-workflow-for-best-execution-in-digital-assets.jpg)

MiFID II transformed fixed income best execution from a qualitative goal into a quantitative, data-driven, and auditable discipline.

- 
### [How Does MiFID II Change the Evidentiary Burden for Asset Managers?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-mifid-ii-change-the-evidentiary-burden-for-asset-managers/)
![A transparent, multi-faceted component, indicative of an RFQ engine's intricate market microstructure logic, emerges from complex FIX Protocol connectivity. Its sharp edges signify high-fidelity execution and price discovery precision for institutional digital asset derivatives. This Prime RFQ module optimizes algorithmic trading and capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimized-for-best-execution.jpg)

MiFID II transforms the evidentiary burden into a systemic requirement to prove optimal execution outcomes through continuous data analysis.

- 
### [How Do the Data Reporting Requirements for Best Execution Differ between the United States and European Frameworks?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-the-data-reporting-requirements-for-best-execution-differ-between-the-united-states-and-european-frameworks/)
![A central glowing blue mechanism with a precision reticle is encased by dark metallic panels. This symbolizes an institutional-grade Principal's operational framework for high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives. It embodies RFQ processing, enabling price discovery within a deep liquidity pool, optimizing market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-core-enabling-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution.jpg)

The core difference in best execution reporting is the U.S. focus on broker-specific disclosures versus the E.U.'s broader aim for market-wide data transparency.

- 
### [What Are the Key Differences in Documenting Best Execution for FINRA versus MiFID II?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-in-documenting-best-execution-for-finra-versus-mifid-ii/)
![A crystalline droplet, representing a block trade or liquidity pool, rests precisely on an advanced Crypto Derivatives OS platform. Its internal shimmering particles signify aggregated order flow and implied volatility data, demonstrating high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency within market microstructure, facilitating private quotation via RFQ protocols.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-rfq-protocol-best-execution.jpg)

FINRA requires a documented, qualitative rationale of "reasonable diligence," while MiFID II demands quantitative proof of "all sufficient steps."

- 
### [What Are the Key Technological Requirements for a Firm to Comply with MiFID II Best Execution?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-technological-requirements-for-a-firm-to-comply-with-mifid-ii-best-execution/)
![A sophisticated mechanism depicting the high-fidelity execution of institutional digital asset derivatives. It visualizes RFQ protocol efficiency, real-time liquidity aggregation, and atomic settlement within a prime brokerage framework, optimizing market microstructure for multi-leg spreads.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-protocol-execution-liquidity-aggregation-system.jpg)

A firm's compliance with MiFID II best execution hinges on an integrated technological system for data capture, analysis, and auditable proof of optimal outcomes.

- 
### [How Does MiFID II Define the Best Execution Factors for Investment Firms?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-mifid-ii-define-the-best-execution-factors-for-investment-firms/)
![Translucent spheres, embodying institutional counterparties, reveal complex internal algorithmic logic. Sharp lines signify high-fidelity execution and RFQ protocols, connecting these liquidity pools. The reflective surface depicts digital asset derivatives market microstructure, facilitating optimal price discovery.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-optimal-execution-engine.jpg)

MiFID II defines best execution as a mandate for firms to use all sufficient steps to obtain the optimal outcome across a range of factors.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "How Does MiFID II Define Best Execution Differently from FINRA?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-mifid-ii-define-best-execution-differently-from-finra/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-mifid-ii-define-best-execution-differently-from-finra/"
    },
    "headline": "How Does MiFID II Define Best Execution Differently from FINRA? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "MiFID II mandates a provable, data-centric system of \"all sufficient steps,\" while FINRA requires a principles-based \"reasonable diligence.\" \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-mifid-ii-define-best-execution-differently-from-finra/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-05T18:27:00+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-08-05T18:27:01+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/principals-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-for-optimized-rfq-protocol-best-execution-system.jpg",
        "caption": "A sophisticated, multi-segment institutional-grade device is depicted, symbolizing a comprehensive Prime RFQ designed for digital asset derivatives trading. Its central data aggregation interface and metallic spigot represent an advanced RFQ protocol engine, facilitating high-fidelity execution, optimized price discovery, and atomic settlement. This system minimizes slippage and adverse selection, ensuring best execution across complex market microstructure. It empowers principals with robust pre-trade analytics, portfolio margin capabilities, and enhanced capital efficiency for multi-leg spreads."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "All Sufficient Steps",
        "Best Execution",
        "Broker-Dealer",
        "Client Classification",
        "Cost Analysis",
        "Execution Factors",
        "Execution Quality",
        "Execution Venues",
        "Financial Industry Regulatory Authority",
        "Financial Instruments",
        "Financial Regulation",
        "FINRA",
        "Investment Firm",
        "Investment Firms",
        "Market Microstructure",
        "MiFID II",
        "Order Routing",
        "Payment for Order Flow",
        "Reasonable Diligence",
        "Regulatory Compliance",
        "Regulatory Technical Standards",
        "RTS 27",
        "RTS 28",
        "Rule 5310",
        "Sufficient Steps",
        "Transaction Cost",
        "Transaction Cost Analysis"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "FAQPage",
    "mainEntity": [
        {
            "@type": "Question",
            "name": "How Does The Scope Of The Mandates Differ?",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "@type": "Answer",
                "text": "A primary strategic divergence is the scope of financial instruments covered. FINRA's Rule 5310 has historically been focused on equities and has been interpreted to apply to other securities like fixed income. MiFID II, from its inception, was designed with a far broader and more explicit reach. It applies to a wide range of financial instruments, including equities, bonds, derivatives (both exchange-traded and over-the-counter), and other structured products. This necessitates a more comprehensive strategic approach for firms operating under MiFID II, as their best execution policy must be designed and implemented across a diverse and complex set of asset classes, each with unique market structures and liquidity profiles. For instance, designing a best execution framework for illiquid OTC derivatives under MiFID II requires a different set of tools and data sources, such as relying on proxy instruments or internal valuation models for benchmarking, compared to executing a liquid equity trade."
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Question",
            "name": "What Are The Core Reporting And Disclosure Differences?",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "@type": "Answer",
                "text": "The operational centerpiece of MiFID II's best execution framework is its detailed reporting regime, specifically the requirements outlined in Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS) 27 and 28. These reports are designed to bring unprecedented transparency to execution quality and venue selection."
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Question",
            "name": "How Does This Impact Operational Architecture?",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "@type": "Answer",
                "text": "Ultimately, a firm's operational architecture must be designed to meet the specific demands of its regulatory environment. For a global firm, this means building a system with the flexibility to accommodate both the prescriptive, data-heavy requirements of MiFID II and the principles-based, judgment-oriented approach of FINRA. This might involve a modular design, where a core execution management system (EMS) is supplemented with jurisdiction-specific modules for compliance monitoring, data analytics, and reporting. The system must be capable of applying different rule sets and logic based on the origin of the order and the client it belongs to, ensuring that the correct standard of care and evidence is applied automatically and reliably."
            }
        }
    ]
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-mifid-ii-define-best-execution-differently-from-finra/
