# How Does Specification Drift in an RFP Correlate with Long-Term Project Failure Rates? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-09
**Categories:** Question

---

![Geometric panels, light and dark, interlocked by a luminous diagonal, depict an institutional RFQ protocol for digital asset derivatives. Central nodes symbolize liquidity aggregation and price discovery within a Principal's execution management system, enabling high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement in market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine-1.jpg)

![A sleek, precision-engineered device with a split-screen interface displaying implied volatility and price discovery data for digital asset derivatives. This institutional grade module optimizes RFQ protocols, ensuring high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency within market microstructure for multi-leg spreads](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-module.jpg)

## Concept

![A precision mechanism, potentially a component of a Crypto Derivatives OS, showcases intricate Market Microstructure for High-Fidelity Execution. Transparent elements suggest Price Discovery and Latent Liquidity within RFQ Protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-crypto-derivatives-rfq-engine-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## The Blueprint as a System

A Request for Proposal (RFP) functions as the foundational schematic for a complex undertaking. It documents the initial state of understanding, codifying the objectives, constraints, and expected functionalities of the final system. This document represents the point of maximum conceptual integrity, a baseline against which all future development is measured. Its purpose is to create a shared, stable reality among all stakeholders, enabling coordinated action toward a unified goal.

The precision of its language and the clarity of its specifications directly inform the potential for project coherence. A project’s trajectory is set by the quality of this initial blueprint, making its creation an act of strategic importance.

[Specification drift](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-quantitatively-assess-its-own-specification-risk-before-issuing-an-rfq/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), often termed scope creep, describes the gradual, and sometimes imperceptible, alteration of these initial requirements over the project lifecycle. It introduces a form of [systemic entropy](https://prime.greeks.live/area/systemic-entropy/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), degrading the coherence of the original plan. Each modification, however minor it appears in isolation, contributes to a cumulative deviation from the baseline. This phenomenon arises from multiple sources ▴ evolving stakeholder needs, incomplete initial analysis, new market pressures, or technological discoveries made mid-project.

The result is a continuous and often unmanaged rewriting of the project’s core DNA while the system is already under construction. This process fundamentally alters the project’s identity, stretching resources, timelines, and personnel beyond their planned capacities.

> Specification drift is the incremental erosion of a project’s foundational blueprint, leading to systemic instability and resource depletion.

![Precision-engineered abstract components depict institutional digital asset derivatives trading. A central sphere, symbolizing core asset price discovery, supports intersecting elements representing multi-leg spreads and aggregated inquiry](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-optimization.jpg)

## Causality in Project Dynamics

The correlation between this requirements ambiguity and long-term [project failure](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-reasons-for-data-migration-project-failure/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is direct and causal. Project failure itself is seldom a singular event but rather the culmination of accumulated deviations. The initial project plan, including budget, timeline, and resource allocation, is an integrated system built upon the specifications defined in the RFP. When specifications drift, the plan’s core assumptions become invalid.

The budget, calculated for a defined scope, becomes insufficient. The timeline, engineered for a known set of tasks, becomes untenable. The technical architecture, designed for a specific functional load, may require a complete overhaul to accommodate new demands.

This creates a cascade of negative effects. Team morale erodes as goalposts shift continuously, leading to burnout and reduced productivity. Rework becomes a substantial portion of the project effort, consuming resources that were allocated for forward progress. The quality of the final deliverable often suffers as teams are forced to take shortcuts to meet deadlines that are no longer realistic.

Communication breaks down as the shared understanding of the project’s purpose dissolves. The project’s failure is therefore a predictable outcome of the system’s inability to absorb unmanaged change, a direct consequence of the integrity loss that began with the first instance of specification drift.

![A symmetrical, angular mechanism with illuminated internal components against a dark background, abstractly representing a high-fidelity execution engine for institutional digital asset derivatives. This visualizes the market microstructure and algorithmic trading precision essential for RFQ protocols, multi-leg spread strategies, and atomic settlement within a Principal OS framework, ensuring capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-execution-engine-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq.jpg)

![Precision-engineered institutional grade components, representing prime brokerage infrastructure, intersect via a translucent teal bar embodying a high-fidelity execution RFQ protocol. This depicts seamless liquidity aggregation and atomic settlement for digital asset derivatives, reflecting complex market microstructure and efficient price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-prime-os-core.jpg)

## Strategy

![Abstract layers visualize institutional digital asset derivatives market microstructure. Teal dome signifies optimal price discovery, high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-protocol-layers-and-market-microstructure-optimization.jpg)

## Establishing a Governance Protocol

Addressing specification drift requires the implementation of a robust governance protocol. This is a formal system designed to manage the process of change itself. The objective of such a protocol is the preservation of the project’s core objectives while providing a structured mechanism for adapting to new information or requirements.

A central component of this strategy is the establishment of a [Change Control Board](https://prime.greeks.live/area/change-control-board/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (CCB). The CCB acts as the central processing unit for all proposed changes, a deliberative body responsible for evaluating the systemic impact of any deviation from the original RFP.

The board’s composition is critical to its function. It must include representatives from all key stakeholder groups ▴ [project management](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-risk-profile-of-an-rfp-for-an-agile-project-differ-from-one-for-a-waterfall-project/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), the technical or engineering team, the business or client side, and finance. This cross-functional structure ensures that any proposed change is analyzed from multiple perspectives. The technical team can assess feasibility and impact on the system’s architecture.

The finance representative can quantify the cost implications. The business stakeholders can validate the strategic value of the proposed change. This 360-degree analysis moves the evaluation of a change from an informal conversation to a rigorous, data-driven decision-making process. The CCB’s authority must be absolute within the project structure; its decisions on scope modifications are final and binding.

![An abstract digital interface features a dark circular screen with two luminous dots, one teal and one grey, symbolizing active and pending private quotation statuses within an RFQ protocol. Below, sharp parallel lines in black, beige, and grey delineate distinct liquidity pools and execution pathways for multi-leg spread strategies, reflecting market microstructure and high-fidelity execution for institutional grade digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-displaying-multi-leg-execution-status-and-optimal-liquidity-pathways.jpg)

## The Dynamics of Change Evaluation

The process for submitting and evaluating a [change request](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-change-in-risk-capacity-differ-from-a-change-in-risk-tolerance-during-due-diligence/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) must be formalized. Every proposed modification should be documented on a standardized Change Request Form. This form compels the requester to articulate the change, its justification, its expected benefits, and its perceived impact on the project. This initial step forces a degree of self-assessment on the part of the requester.

Once submitted, the CCB evaluates the request against a set of predefined criteria. These criteria should include strategic alignment, return on investment, technical feasibility, risk exposure, and impact on existing resources and timelines. This structured evaluation prevents arbitrary decision-making and ensures that changes are approved based on their net value to the project.

There exists a fundamental tension between maintaining rigid control to prevent drift and allowing for the flexibility needed to respond to valid, evolving needs. A governance protocol must navigate this. It does so by transforming drift into a series of discrete, managed change orders. Each approved change results in a formal update to the project blueprint, including adjustments to the budget, timeline, and resource plan.

This process makes the cost of change visible and deliberate. The project’s scope may still evolve, but it does so in a controlled, transparent, and fully-costed manner. The system adapts, but it does so without losing its integrity.

> A Change Control Board transforms chaotic specification drift into a managed process of deliberate, cost-assessed scope evolution.

The following table compares the attributes of an unmanaged project environment with a project governed by a formal [change control](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-role-based-access-control-differ-from-attribute-based-access-control-for-financial-systems/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) protocol.

| Attribute | Ungoverned Project Environment | Governed Project Environment |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Change Mechanism | Informal requests, hallway conversations, email chains. | Formalized Change Request Forms submitted to a CCB. |
| Decision Making | Arbitrary, often based on influence or perceived urgency. | Data-driven, based on predefined evaluation criteria. |
| Impact Analysis | Minimal or non-existent. Consequences are discovered later. | Mandatory and comprehensive (cost, schedule, risk, technical). |
| Visibility | Scope changes are opaque, creating a “shadow scope.” | All changes are documented, approved, and visible to all stakeholders. |
| Budget & Timeline | Original baselines become meaningless; overruns are inevitable. | Baselines are formally re-baselined with each approved change. |
| Outcome | High probability of project failure, team burnout, and stakeholder dissatisfaction. | Higher probability of project success, controlled evolution, and stakeholder alignment. |

![A precise, engineered apparatus with channels and a metallic tip engages foundational and derivative elements. This depicts market microstructure for high-fidelity execution of block trades via RFQ protocols, enabling algorithmic trading of digital asset derivatives within a Prime RFQ intelligence layer](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-3.jpg)

## Requirements Traceability as a Core Discipline

A complementary strategic tool is the [Requirements Traceability Matrix](https://prime.greeks.live/area/requirements-traceability-matrix/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (RTM). An RTM is a document that maps each user requirement to its corresponding function, design element, test case, and business objective. It creates an unbroken chain of lineage from the highest-level strategic goal down to the most granular implementation detail. 

- **Forward Traceability** ▴ This ensures that each requirement specified in the RFP is being addressed by a specific element in the final product. It answers the question, “Are we building what we said we would build?”

- **Backward Traceability** ▴ This ensures that every feature or function in the final product is directly linked to a specific, approved requirement. It answers the question, “Why are we building this?” This discipline is exceptionally powerful in combating “gold plating,” the addition of unrequested features that add complexity and cost without delivering value against the core objectives.

During a change request evaluation, the RTM becomes an indispensable analytical tool for the CCB. It allows the board to visualize the ripple effects of a proposed change across the entire system. By examining the matrix, the CCB can identify all affected components, test cases that will need to be rewritten, and design documents that will require updates. This provides a far more accurate and complete picture of the true cost and effort associated with the change, enabling a more intelligent and informed decision.

![Angular dark planes frame luminous turquoise pathways converging centrally. This visualizes institutional digital asset derivatives market microstructure, highlighting RFQ protocols for private quotation and high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-rfq-protocols-for-institutional-digital-assets.jpg)

![An abstract, precision-engineered mechanism showcases polished chrome components connecting a blue base, cream panel, and a teal display with numerical data. This symbolizes an institutional-grade RFQ protocol for digital asset derivatives, ensuring high-fidelity execution, price discovery, multi-leg spread processing, and atomic settlement within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-precision-execution-1.jpg)

## Execution

![A precision-engineered metallic component with a central circular mechanism, secured by fasteners, embodies a Prime RFQ engine. It drives institutional liquidity and high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives, facilitating atomic settlement of block trades and private quotation within market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-platform-rfq-engine-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-atomic-settlement-of-block-trades.jpg)

## Quantitative Modeling of Drift and Failure Probability

The relationship between specification drift and project failure is not linear. Small amounts of drift can often be absorbed by a project with minimal impact. As the cumulative percentage of drift increases, however, its effects on project stability and success probability grow exponentially.

We can model this relationship to provide a quantitative foundation for governance policies. The following model illustrates how increasing levels of unmanaged scope drift correlate with budget overruns, [schedule slippage](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-differences-in-impact-signatures-between-schedule-driven-and-opportunistic-algorithms/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), and the overall probability of project failure.

Consider a hypothetical $5 million, 24-month project. The model assumes that the project has a baseline failure probability of 15% due to inherent market and execution risks. The key variable is Specification Drift (SD), expressed as a percentage of the original project scope (measured in features, function points, or man-hours). The model uses exponents greater than 1 to reflect the non-linear, cascading impact of drift.

The formulas could be conceptualized as:

- **Budget Overrun %** = (SD%) ^ 1.5

- **Schedule Slippage %** = (SD%) ^ 1.4

- **Probability of Failure (%)** = Baseline Failure % + (SD%) ^ 1.8

This table demonstrates the outputs of this model. It shows that a 10% drift is challenging but potentially manageable, resulting in a 32% budget overrun and a 25% schedule slippage. When drift reaches 30%, the project enters a state of extreme distress, with a budget overrun of nearly 165% and a schedule slippage of over 120%. At this level, the probability of outright failure has climbed to over 80%, indicating a project that has almost certainly lost its viability.

| Specification Drift (SD %) | Budget Overrun (%) | Schedule Slippage (%) | Calculated Probability of Failure (%) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 5% | 11.2% | 8.7% | 18.5% |
| 10% | 31.6% | 25.1% | 29.4% |
| 15% | 58.1% | 46.9% | 45.8% |
| 20% | 89.4% | 73.6% | 66.8% |
| 25% | 125.0% | 104.9% | 91.6% |
| 30% | 164.3% | 140.6% | 120.0% (Effectively Total Failure) |

![A robust metallic framework supports a teal half-sphere, symbolizing an institutional grade digital asset derivative or block trade processed within a Prime RFQ environment. This abstract view highlights the intricate market microstructure and high-fidelity execution of an RFQ protocol, ensuring capital efficiency and minimizing slippage through precise system interaction](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine.jpg)

## The Operational Playbook for a Change Control Board

A Change Control Board’s effectiveness is a direct result of its operational discipline. The following playbook outlines a structured, repeatable process for managing change requests from submission to disposition.

- **Intake and Logging**
All change requests must be submitted via a standardized digital form. The form is received by the Project Management Office (PMO), which logs the request in a central Change Request Log. The request is assigned a unique tracking number, and an initial check is performed to ensure the form is complete. Incomplete forms are returned to the requester.

- **Initial Impact Assessment**
The PMO, in conjunction with the technical lead, performs a preliminary impact analysis. This is a high-level assessment to categorize the change’s potential impact (Low, Medium, High) on cost, schedule, and resources. This initial sort helps prioritize the agenda for the CCB meeting. Low-impact, low-cost changes might be batched for expedited approval, while high-impact changes require deep analysis.

- **CCB Review Meeting**
The CCB convenes on a regular schedule (e.g. weekly or bi-weekly). The requester of each change is invited to briefly present their proposal and its business justification. The board then discusses the change, using the impact assessment and the Requirements Traceability Matrix as primary analytical tools. The discussion is structured to evaluate the request against the project’s core objectives.

- **Decision and Disposition**
For each request, the CCB makes one of four possible decisions:

<li>**Approve** ▴ The change is accepted. The PMO is tasked with creating a formal change order and updating all project documentation, including the budget, schedule, and scope baseline.

- **Reject** ▴ The change is declined. The rationale for the rejection is documented and communicated to the requester. This prevents the same request from being repeatedly submitted without new information.

- **Defer** ▴ The change may have merit but is not strategically viable at the current time. It is placed on a “deferred” list to be reconsidered at a later project phase or as part of a future project.

- **Request More Information** ▴ The board requires a more detailed analysis of the change’s impact or justification. The request is returned to the requester with specific questions that must be answered before it can be reconsidered.

</li>
- **Communication and Implementation**
The outcome of all change requests is documented in the CCB meeting minutes and the central Change Request Log. The decisions are communicated to all relevant stakeholders. For approved changes, the project manager officially adjusts the project plan, reallocates resources, and communicates the new baseline to the project team. This ensures the entire team is working from the same, updated blueprint.

![Intersecting teal and dark blue planes, with reflective metallic lines, depict structured pathways for institutional digital asset derivatives trading. This symbolizes high-fidelity execution, RFQ protocol orchestration, and multi-venue liquidity aggregation within a Prime RFQ, reflecting precise market microstructure and optimal price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-rfq-execution-liquidity-microstructure.jpg)

## Predictive Scenario Analysis a Tale of Two Projects

Imagine a large financial institution, “Global Consolidated Bank,” embarking on a $20 million project to build a new enterprise-wide risk management platform. The RFP is detailed, outlining hundreds of specific requirements for data aggregation, risk modeling, and regulatory reporting. The project is scheduled to take 30 months.

**Scenario A ▴ The Ungoverned Path.** The project kicks off with enthusiasm. Two months in, a senior executive in the capital markets division insists that the platform must include real-time derivatives pricing, a feature not in the original scope. The project manager, lacking a formal governance process, feels pressured to agree. The engineering team scrambles to accommodate the change, pulling resources from core development.

This single change adds an estimated four months to the schedule and $1.5 million to the cost, but this is never formally documented. Three months later, the wealth management division demands a client-facing portal, another major addition. This pattern continues. By the 18-month mark, the project is in chaos.

The team is trying to build a system with a scope that has drifted by an estimated 40%. The budget is exhausted, the timeline has been extended twice, and team morale has collapsed due to constant rework and shifting priorities. The technical architecture, designed for the original scope, is unstable and performs poorly under the weight of the new features. Key engineers resign.

At the 36-month mark, with the project costing over $35 million and still not close to delivering a stable product, the board of directors cancels the initiative entirely. The $35 million is written off as a loss. The failure damages the careers of several managers and leaves the bank with its old, inadequate risk system.

> Unmanaged drift creates a shadow project, one that consumes the resources of the real project while steering it toward certain failure.

**Scenario B ▴ The Governed Path.** From day one, the project operates under the authority of a CCB. When the capital markets executive requests real-time derivatives pricing, he is asked to submit a formal change request. He documents the business case, showing it could reduce hedging costs. The CCB convenes.

The technical lead uses the RTM to show that this change will impact 15% of the existing data architecture and require a new, expensive data feed. The finance representative calculates the cost at $1.8 million and a 5-month schedule extension. The board evaluates the ROI. They decide the strategic value is high.

They approve the change. The project’s official budget is increased to $21.8 million, and the timeline is extended to 35 months. The project plan is formally re-baselined. When the wealth management division requests their portal, they too submit a request.

After analysis, the CCB determines that while the idea is good, its technical impact is too severe at this stage. They defer the request, recommending it be a standalone “Phase 2” project after the core platform is delivered. This process repeats for every proposed change. At the 35-month mark, the project is delivered successfully.

It cost $23 million, slightly over the re-baselined budget, but it delivers the core functionality plus the high-value derivatives feature. The bank has a powerful, stable risk platform, and the project is considered a success because it managed its evolution deliberately. The system works.

![Sleek, intersecting planes, one teal, converge at a reflective central module. This visualizes an institutional digital asset derivatives Prime RFQ, enabling RFQ price discovery across liquidity pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimizing-institutional-liquidity-aggregation-and-best-execution.jpg)

## References

- Al-Dbass, M. M. & Al-Dhmour, F. M. (2014). The impact of scope creep on project success ▴ A case study of a software development project in Jordan. International Journal of Academic Research, 6(1), 149-155.

- Cobb, C. G. (2015). The Project Manager’s Guide to Mastering Agile ▴ Principles and Practices for an Adaptive Approach. John Wiley & Sons.

- Hastie, S. & Wojewoda, S. (2015). Standish Group 2015 Chaos Report – Q&A with Jennifer Lynch. InfoQ.

- Kerzner, H. (2017). Project Management ▴ A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. John Wiley & Sons.

- McManus, J. & Wood-Harper, T. (2007). Understanding the sources of information systems project failure. Management Services, 51(3), 38-43.

- Project Management Institute. (2021). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide) ▴ Seventh Edition. Project Management Institute, Inc.

- Sommerville, I. (2016). Software Engineering. 10th ed. Pearson.

- Wysocki, R. K. (2013). Effective Project Management ▴ Traditional, Agile, Extreme. John Wiley & Sons.

![A multi-layered electronic system, centered on a precise circular module, visually embodies an institutional-grade Crypto Derivatives OS. It represents the intricate market microstructure enabling high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols for digital asset derivatives, driven by an intelligence layer facilitating algorithmic trading and optimal price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-facilitating-high-fidelity-execution-and-optimal-price-discovery.jpg)

## Reflection

![Two intersecting technical arms, one opaque metallic and one transparent blue with internal glowing patterns, pivot around a central hub. This symbolizes a Principal's RFQ protocol engine, enabling high-fidelity execution and price discovery for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-grade-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine.jpg)

## The Resilience of the System

The examination of specification drift moves beyond a simple analysis of project management tactics. It compels a deeper consideration of an organization’s entire operational constitution. The presence of a robust governance system for managing change is a powerful indicator of institutional maturity. It reflects a culture that values discipline, transparency, and data-driven decision-making.

The absence of such a system suggests a vulnerability that extends far beyond a single project’s failure. It points to a potential for systemic chaos, where strategic intent is continuously undermined by unmanaged operational realities.

![A transparent blue sphere, symbolizing precise Price Discovery and Implied Volatility, is central to a layered Principal's Operational Framework. This structure facilitates High-Fidelity Execution and RFQ Protocol processing across diverse Aggregated Liquidity Pools, revealing the intricate Market Microstructure of Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system-microstructure-principal-framework.jpg)

## An Architecture of Intent

Ultimately, a project’s success or failure is a function of its structural integrity. This integrity is not static; it is a dynamic quality that must be actively maintained. The frameworks and protocols for managing change are the load-bearing structures that protect a project’s core purpose. They provide the resilience needed to absorb external pressures and adapt to new information without collapsing.

Building these structures requires foresight and a commitment to process. The resulting stability, however, enables the confident execution of complex, ambitious goals, transforming strategic vision into delivered value.

![Abstract planes delineate dark liquidity and a bright price discovery zone. Concentric circles signify volatility surface and order book dynamics for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-execution-3.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-quantitatively-assess-its-own-specification-risk-before-issuing-an-rfq/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A refined object, dark blue and beige, symbolizes an institutional-grade RFQ platform. Its metallic base with a central sensor embodies the Prime RFQ Intelligence Layer, enabling High-Fidelity Execution, Price Discovery, and efficient Liquidity Pool access for Digital Asset Derivatives within Market Microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/prime-os-rfq-protocols-for-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

## Specification Drift

An organization quantitatively assesses specification risk by modeling the ambiguity of its RFQ against market conditions and operational capacity. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/systemic-entropy/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A reflective, metallic platter with a central spindle and an integrated circuit board edge against a dark backdrop. This imagery evokes the core low-latency infrastructure for institutional digital asset derivatives, illustrating high-fidelity execution and market microstructure dynamics](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-infrastructure-precision.jpg)

## Systemic Entropy

Meaning ▴ Systemic Entropy, within the framework of crypto systems architecture and market analysis, refers to the inherent tendency of complex, decentralized digital asset systems to drift towards increasing disorder, unpredictability, or operational inefficiency over time. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-reasons-for-data-migration-project-failure/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A transparent glass sphere rests precisely on a metallic rod, connecting a grey structural element and a dark teal engineered module with a clear lens. This symbolizes atomic settlement of digital asset derivatives via private quotation within a Prime RFQ, showcasing high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency for RFQ protocols and liquidity aggregation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/architecting-high-fidelity-execution-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-and-systemic-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## Project Failure

Data migration failure stems from mischaracterizing it as a technical task, not a complex business transformation requiring deep data intelligence. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/change-control-board/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, multi-layered platform with a reflective blue dome represents an institutional grade Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives. The glowing interstice symbolizes atomic settlement and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/optimized-rfq-protocol-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-1.jpg)

## Change Control Board

Meaning ▴ A Change Control Board (CCB) is a formal group of stakeholders responsible for reviewing, approving, or rejecting proposed modifications to a project's baselines, product configurations, or operational systems. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-risk-profile-of-an-rfp-for-an-agile-project-differ-from-one-for-a-waterfall-project/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A high-fidelity institutional digital asset derivatives execution platform. A central conical hub signifies precise price discovery and aggregated inquiry for RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-1.jpg)

## Project Management

The risk in a Waterfall RFP is failing to define the right project; the risk in an Agile RFP is failing to select the right partner to discover it. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-change-in-risk-capacity-differ-from-a-change-in-risk-tolerance-during-due-diligence/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Reflective planes and intersecting elements depict institutional digital asset derivatives market microstructure. A central Principal-driven RFQ protocol ensures high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement across diverse liquidity pools, optimizing multi-leg spread strategies on a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-precision.jpg)

## Change Request

A change in risk capacity alters an institution's financial ability to bear loss; a change in risk tolerance shifts its psychological will. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-role-based-access-control-differ-from-attribute-based-access-control-for-financial-systems/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Intersecting sleek components of a Crypto Derivatives OS symbolize RFQ Protocol for Institutional Grade Digital Asset Derivatives. Luminous internal segments represent dynamic Liquidity Pool management and Market Microstructure insights, facilitating High-Fidelity Execution for Block Trade strategies within a Prime Brokerage framework](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-engine.jpg)

## Change Control

RBAC assigns permissions by static role, while ABAC provides dynamic, granular control using multi-faceted attributes. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/requirements-traceability-matrix/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract geometric forms converge at a central point, symbolizing institutional digital asset derivatives trading. This depicts RFQ protocol aggregation and price discovery across diverse liquidity pools, ensuring high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-microstructure-core-liquidity-hub.jpg)

## Requirements Traceability Matrix

Meaning ▴ A Requirements Traceability Matrix (RTM) is a structured document that links user requirements to corresponding design specifications, test cases, and functional components within a software development project. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-differences-in-impact-signatures-between-schedule-driven-and-opportunistic-algorithms/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, segmented cream and dark gray automated device, depicting an institutional grade Prime RFQ engine. It represents precise execution management system functionality for digital asset derivatives, optimizing price discovery and high-fidelity execution within market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-engine-optimal-institutional-digital-asset-execution-system.jpg)

## Schedule Slippage

Schedule-driven algorithms prioritize benchmark fidelity, while opportunistic algorithms adapt to market conditions to minimize cost. </a>

**Tags:** [RFP Integrity](https://options.greeks.live/area/rfp-integrity/), [Requirements Traceability Matrix](https://options.greeks.live/area/requirements-traceability-matrix/), [Scope Creep](https://options.greeks.live/area/scope-creep/), [Project Governance](https://options.greeks.live/area/project-governance/), [Quantitative Project Modeling](https://options.greeks.live/area/quantitative-project-modeling/), [Project Baseline Management](https://options.greeks.live/area/project-baseline-management/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [What Are the Primary Challenges in Maintaining a Most Restrictive Standard Framework over Time?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-challenges-in-maintaining-a-most-restrictive-standard-framework-over-time/)
![Sharp, intersecting geometric planes in teal, deep blue, and beige form a precise, pointed leading edge against darkness. This signifies High-Fidelity Execution for Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives, reflecting complex Market Microstructure and Price Discovery. It embodies RFQ optimization, Capital Efficiency across Liquidity Pools, and Atomic Settlement via a Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-market-microstructure-2.jpg)

Maintaining a restrictive framework is an exercise in managing systemic entropy against evolving technological, economic, and human pressures.

- 
### [What Is the Role of an Executive Sponsor in Overcoming Deadlocks during Internal RFP Alignment?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-role-of-an-executive-sponsor-in-overcoming-deadlocks-during-internal-rfp-alignment/)
![A central processing core with intersecting, transparent structures revealing intricate internal components and blue data flows. This symbolizes an institutional digital asset derivatives platform's Prime RFQ, orchestrating high-fidelity execution, managing aggregated RFQ inquiries, and ensuring atomic settlement within dynamic market microstructure, optimizing capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-system-facilitating-high-fidelity-rfq-protocol-optimization-for-best-execution-and-atomic-settlement.jpg)

The executive sponsor acts as the ultimate system arbiter, deploying authority to resolve conflicts and realign the RFP with strategic goals.

- 
### [What Are the Primary Financial Risks of Poor Stakeholder Alignment in a Procurement Process?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-financial-risks-of-poor-stakeholder-alignment-in-a-procurement-process/)
![Mirrored abstract components with glowing indicators, linked by an articulated mechanism, depict an institutional grade Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives. This visualizes RFQ protocol driven high-fidelity execution, price discovery, and atomic settlement across market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-rfq-high-fidelity-execution-microstructure.jpg)

Poor stakeholder alignment creates a flawed procurement system, causing financial risks like cost overruns and value leakage.

- 
### [What Are the Most Common Pitfalls to Avoid When Drafting the Scope of Work for an Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-pitfalls-to-avoid-when-drafting-the-scope-of-work-for-an-rfp/)
![A sharp metallic element pierces a central teal ring, symbolizing high-fidelity execution via an RFQ protocol gateway for institutional digital asset derivatives. This depicts precise price discovery and smart order routing within market microstructure, optimizing dark liquidity for block trades and capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-protocol-optimizing-liquidity-discovery-and-smart-order-routing.jpg)

A Scope of Work's integrity dictates project success by translating objectives into a precise, enforceable operational blueprint.

- 
### [What Are the Most Common Pitfalls to Avoid When Building Stakeholder Consensus for an Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-pitfalls-to-avoid-when-building-stakeholder-consensus-for-an-rfp/)
![Translucent geometric planes, speckled with micro-droplets, converge at a central nexus, emitting precise illuminated lines. This embodies Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives Market Microstructure, detailing RFQ protocol efficiency, High-Fidelity Execution pathways, and granular Atomic Settlement within a transparent Liquidity Pool.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-protocol-market-microstructure.jpg)

Building stakeholder consensus for an RFP is a systems engineering challenge of aligning diverse operational inputs into a single, coherent specification.

- 
### [How Can an Organization Formally Define the Triggers for Executive Sponsor Intervention in an Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-formally-define-the-triggers-for-executive-sponsor-intervention-in-an-rfp/)
![A sleek, domed control module, light green to deep blue, on a textured grey base, signifies precision. This represents a Principal's Prime RFQ for institutional digital asset derivatives, enabling high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols, optimizing price discovery, and enhancing capital efficiency within market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-control-for-institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution.jpg)

A formalized intervention framework translates executive oversight from a vague concept into a calibrated, data-driven control system for RFP execution.

- 
### [What Are the Primary Risks in an Erp and Rfp Platform Integration Project?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-risks-in-an-erp-and-rfp-platform-integration-project/)
![A central concentric ring structure, representing a Prime RFQ hub, processes RFQ protocols. Radiating translucent geometric shapes, symbolizing block trades and multi-leg spreads, illustrate liquidity aggregation for digital asset derivatives. Sharp angular elements highlight high-fidelity execution and price discovery in market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine-4.jpg)

The primary risks in an ERP and RFP platform integration project stem from the complex interplay of technology, people, and processes.

- 
### [How Does a Two-Stage RFP Mitigate Financial Risk in Large IT Projects?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-two-stage-rfp-mitigate-financial-risk-in-large-it-projects/)
![Intersecting dark conduits, internally lit, symbolize robust RFQ protocols and high-fidelity execution pathways. A large teal sphere depicts an aggregated liquidity pool or dark pool, while a split sphere embodies counterparty risk and multi-leg spread mechanics. A small sphere represents a specific private quotation within institutional market microstructure for digital asset derivatives.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-7.jpg)

A two-stage RFP de-risks IT projects by separating technical validation from financial competition, ensuring solutions are viable before price is considered.

- 
### [How Can a Stakeholder Influence Map Mitigate Financial Risks in the Procurement Process?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-a-stakeholder-influence-map-mitigate-financial-risks-in-the-procurement-process/)
![A segmented circular diagram, split diagonally. Its core, with blue rings, represents the Prime RFQ Intelligence Layer driving High-Fidelity Execution for Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives. Outer segments denote RFQ protocols and order flow pathways, reflecting Market Microstructure for Private Quotation.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/high-speed-prime-os-rfq-digital-asset-derivatives-trade-execution.jpg)

A stakeholder influence map mitigates financial risk by translating social dynamics into a quantitative risk model for proactive control.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "How Does Specification Drift in an RFP Correlate with Long-Term Project Failure Rates?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-specification-drift-in-an-rfp-correlate-with-long-term-project-failure-rates/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-specification-drift-in-an-rfp-correlate-with-long-term-project-failure-rates/"
    },
    "headline": "How Does Specification Drift in an RFP Correlate with Long-Term Project Failure Rates? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "Specification drift degrades a project's foundational integrity, causing a non-linear increase in failure probability. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-specification-drift-in-an-rfp-correlate-with-long-term-project-failure-rates/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-09T23:12:46+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-10-30T22:50:38+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-cross-asset-rfq-execution-hub.jpg",
        "caption": "A segmented sphere represents a central institutional Prime RFQ for global digital asset derivatives. Intersecting linear structures symbolize high-fidelity RFQ protocols, enabling multi-leg spread execution and sophisticated price discovery across diverse liquidity pools. This illustrates advanced algorithmic trading, robust risk management within market microstructure, encompassing dark pool dynamics. It highlights optimal best execution, capital efficiency, and systemic risk mitigation for Bitcoin Options and Ethereum Futures."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Change Control Board",
        "Change Management Protocol",
        "Project Baseline Management",
        "Project Failure Analysis",
        "Project Governance",
        "Quantitative Project Modeling",
        "Requirements Traceability Matrix",
        "RFP Integrity",
        "Scope Creep",
        "Stakeholder Alignment",
        "Systemic Entropy"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-specification-drift-in-an-rfp-correlate-with-long-term-project-failure-rates/
