# How Does the 2002 ISDA Set off Differ from the 1992 Agreement? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-04
**Categories:** Question

---

![A sophisticated mechanical core, split by contrasting illumination, represents an Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives RFQ engine. Its precise concentric mechanisms symbolize High-Fidelity Execution, Market Microstructure optimization, and Algorithmic Trading within a Prime RFQ, enabling optimal Price Discovery and Liquidity Aggregation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-engine-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-precision-execution.jpg)

![A transparent blue sphere, symbolizing precise Price Discovery and Implied Volatility, is central to a layered Principal's Operational Framework. This structure facilitates High-Fidelity Execution and RFQ Protocol processing across diverse Aggregated Liquidity Pools, revealing the intricate Market Microstructure of Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system-microstructure-principal-framework.jpg)

## Concept

The transition from the 1992 International [Swaps and Derivatives](https://prime.greeks.live/area/swaps-and-derivatives/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) Association (ISDA) [Master Agreement](https://prime.greeks.live/area/master-agreement/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) to its 2002 successor represents a critical system upgrade in the architecture of over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives markets. Viewing these agreements as mere legal documents is a fundamental misinterpretation of their function. They are, in essence, the distributed operating system for global financial risk transfer. The 1992 Agreement was a robust, first-generation protocol that enabled the explosive growth of the derivatives market.

However, market stresses throughout the 1990s, including events like the collapse of Barings Bank and the Asian financial crisis, revealed architectural limitations and potential ambiguities within its code. The 2002 Agreement was engineered to patch these vulnerabilities, enhance processing logic, and create a more resilient and predictable environment for managing [counterparty default](https://prime.greeks.live/area/counterparty-default/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite).

At the core of this operating system is the protocol for close-out netting, a mechanism that allows two parties to calculate a single net payment obligation upon the termination of their transactions following a default. This is the system’s primary defense against systemic risk. The [set-off provision](https://prime.greeks.live/area/set-off-provision/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), specifically Section 6(f) in both agreements, functions as a secondary, but powerful, risk mitigation subroutine. It grants the [non-defaulting party](https://prime.greeks.live/area/non-defaulting-party/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) a contractual right to apply any amounts it owes to the defaulting party against any amounts the defaulting party owes it, even those arising outside the specific Master Agreement.

The distinction between the 1992 and 2002 versions of this subroutine, while textually subtle, has significant implications for the efficiency and certainty of the default management process. The 2002 version seeks to refine the logic, clarify its application, and reduce the potential for disputes during the critical moments following a counterparty failure.

> The 2002 ISDA Master Agreement was engineered as a direct response to the systemic risks and legal ambiguities identified during the operational lifespan of the 1992 version.

Understanding the evolution of the set-off clause requires appreciating the broader philosophical shift between the two documents. The 1992 Agreement, while foundational, left certain procedural aspects open to interpretation, relying on the “reasonableness” of the parties. The 2002 Agreement moves towards a more prescriptive and objective framework. It attempts to codify best practices and reduce ambiguity, thereby increasing legal certainty and minimizing the scope for protracted disputes in a post-default scenario.

This shift is most apparent in the revamped close-out calculation methodology, which directly impacts the final amounts that become subject to the set-off provision. Therefore, the analysis of Section 6(f) cannot be performed in isolation; it must be viewed as an integrated component of a comprehensively redesigned default management system.

![Two spheres balance on a fragmented structure against split dark and light backgrounds. This models institutional digital asset derivatives RFQ protocols, depicting market microstructure, price discovery, and liquidity aggregation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-price-discovery-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

![A precision-engineered metallic and glass system depicts the core of an Institutional Grade Prime RFQ, facilitating high-fidelity execution for Digital Asset Derivatives. Transparent layers represent visible liquidity pools and the intricate market microstructure supporting RFQ protocol processing, ensuring atomic settlement capabilities](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/robust-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-platform-for-optimized-rfq-protocol-execution-and-deep-liquidity-access.jpg)

## Strategy

The strategic decision for an institution to use the 1992 or [2002 ISDA Master Agreement](https://prime.greeks.live/area/2002-isda-master-agreement/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) hinges on a detailed assessment of its counterparty risk appetite, operational capabilities, and legal preferences. The 2002 Agreement introduces several architectural changes that, while designed to enhance clarity and reduce risk, also impose different obligations on the calculating party. The primary strategic delta revolves around the methodology for determining the [close-out amount](https://prime.greeks.live/area/close-out-amount/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) and the explicit inclusion of new termination events.

![A precise, metallic central mechanism with radiating blades on a dark background represents an Institutional Grade Crypto Derivatives OS. It signifies high-fidelity execution for multi-leg spreads via RFQ protocols, optimizing market microstructure for price discovery and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system-microstructure-hub.jpg)

## Close out Calculation a Tale of Two Logics

The 1992 Agreement presented a bifurcated system for calculating the termination payment. Parties could elect either “[Market Quotation](https://prime.greeks.live/area/market-quotation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)” or “Loss.”

- 
**Market Quotation** required the non-[defaulting party](https://prime.greeks.live/area/defaulting-party/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) to obtain quotes from leading market makers for replacement transactions. This was a relatively objective, but potentially rigid and impractical, process, especially in illiquid or stressed markets where obtaining firm quotes is challenging.

- 
**Loss** provided more flexibility, allowing the non-defaulting party to determine its total losses and costs in good faith. This method, while more adaptable, was also more subjective, opening the door to disputes over the “reasonableness” of the calculation.

The 2002 Agreement consolidates these two approaches into a single, unified metric called the “Close-Out Amount.” This new definition requires the determining party to calculate its gains or losses in good faith using “[commercially reasonable procedures](https://prime.greeks.live/area/commercially-reasonable-procedures/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) to produce a [commercially reasonable](https://prime.greeks.live/area/commercially-reasonable/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) result.” This standard is more objective than the 1992 “Loss” definition. It implies a duty to follow a process that a neutral observer would consider rational and sound, referencing available market data, internal models, and other relevant information. The strategic consequence is a shift of power. While the non-defaulting party still performs the calculation, the 2002 framework provides the defaulting party with stronger grounds to challenge a calculation that deviates from observable market realities or rational process.

> The 2002 Agreement’s “Close-Out Amount” introduces a more objective, process-oriented standard for valuation compared to the dual, more subjective methodologies of the 1992 version.

![Interconnected, precisely engineered modules, resembling Prime RFQ components, illustrate an RFQ protocol for digital asset derivatives. The diagonal conduit signifies atomic settlement within a dark pool environment, ensuring high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-protocol-engine.jpg)

## How Does Force Majeure Impact Termination Rights?

A significant addition in the 2002 Agreement is the “[Force Majeure](https://prime.greeks.live/area/force-majeure/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)” Termination Event. This provision addresses situations where external events beyond a party’s control (such as natural disasters, political turmoil, or the imposition of capital controls) make performance impossible or illegal. Under the 1992 Agreement, such scenarios could lead to legal uncertainty, potentially leaving parties locked in trades for extended periods.

The 2002 version provides a clear, structured pathway to terminate affected transactions after a waiting period, thereby preventing the indefinite accumulation of risk. Strategically, this is a vital enhancement for institutions with significant cross-border exposure, as it provides a contractual mechanism for managing sovereign and political risks that were not explicitly addressed in the earlier framework.

![Precision-engineered metallic discs, interconnected by a central spindle, against a deep void, symbolize the core architecture of an Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives RFQ protocol. This setup facilitates private quotation, robust portfolio margin, and high-fidelity execution, optimizing market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-core-infrastructure.jpg)

## The Set off Provision a Refined Tool

The set-off provision itself, Section 6(f), is where the architectural refinement is most evident. While the core principle remains the same ▴ the right to offset mutual debts ▴ the 2002 version provides greater clarity and certainty. The 1992 language was concise, granting the right of set-off “to the extent permitted by applicable law.” The 2002 version expands on this, explicitly stating that the [set-off right](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-practical-effect-of-an-automatic-stay-in-bankruptcy-on-a-creditors-right-of-set-off/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is in addition to, and not in limitation of, any other present or future rights of set-off, combination of accounts, or other rights to which any party is entitled. This more robust language was designed to bolster the provision against legal challenges, particularly in cross-jurisdictional insolvency proceedings.

The strategic value lies in the increased confidence a non-defaulting party can have in its ability to enforce the set-off right, reducing the net exposure it faces in a default scenario. The table below outlines the key strategic differences.

| Provision | 1992 ISDA Master Agreement | 2002 ISDA Master Agreement | Strategic Implication |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Close-Out Calculation | Dual-track ▴ Market Quotation (objective but rigid) or Loss (flexible but subjective). | Single-track ▴ Close-Out Amount, based on “commercially reasonable procedures.” | The 2002 version imposes a higher procedural burden on the calculating party but provides greater objectivity and potentially reduces disputes. |
| Force Majeure | No explicit provision. Parties faced legal uncertainty. | Includes a Force Majeure Termination Event with a defined waiting period. | Provides a clear mechanism for managing political and sovereign risks, enhancing stability for cross-border transactions. |
| Set-Off Language (Section 6(f)) | Grants the right of set-off “to the extent permitted by applicable law.” | Expands language to be “in addition to, and not in limitation of” other rights, bolstering its legal standing. | Increases the certainty and enforceability of the set-off right, providing a stronger risk mitigation tool for the non-defaulting party. |
| Interest on Unpaid Amounts | Calculated at a single rate, regardless of the currency. | Allows for different interest rates for different currencies, more accurately reflecting the cost of funding. | The 2002 approach is more economically precise and equitable for multicurrency transactions. |

![An institutional-grade platform's RFQ protocol interface, with a price discovery engine and precision guides, enables high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives. Integrated controls optimize market microstructure and liquidity aggregation within a Principal's operational framework](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/proprietary-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-facilitating-high-fidelity-execution-and-granular-market-microstructure-analysis-for-prime-os.jpg)

![Stacked, glossy modular components depict an institutional-grade Digital Asset Derivatives platform. Layers signify RFQ protocol orchestration, high-fidelity execution, and liquidity aggregation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/layered-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-stack-for-prime-brokerage.jpg)

## Execution

From an operational standpoint, the execution of close-out and set-off procedures under the 2002 [ISDA Master Agreement](https://prime.greeks.live/area/isda-master-agreement/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) demands a more rigorous and documented process than its 1992 predecessor. The shift to the “Close-Out Amount” standard is not merely semantic; it imposes a tangible procedural burden on the non-defaulting party. This party must be prepared to defend its calculation methodology as “commercially reasonable” in a potential legal challenge. This requires a robust internal framework for valuation and record-keeping.

![A sleek, spherical, off-white device with a glowing cyan lens symbolizes an Institutional Grade Prime RFQ Intelligence Layer. It drives High-Fidelity Execution of Digital Asset Derivatives via RFQ Protocols, enabling Optimal Liquidity Aggregation and Price Discovery for Market Microstructure Analysis](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimal-execution-1.jpg)

## Executing the Close out Calculation

An institution executing a close-out under the 2002 Agreement must systematically assemble and consider various pieces of information. This process is far more involved than simply calling three brokers for a quote, as might have been sufficient under the 1992 Market Quotation method. The following table details the operational steps and required inputs.

| Step | Operational Action | Required Data Inputs | Contrast with 1992 Version |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1. Information Gathering | The calculating party must gather all relevant information available to it. | – Quotations from third parties (market makers, brokers). – Relevant market data (e.g. prices, rates, volatilities). – Information from internal pricing models. – Figures for costs of funding or unwinding related hedges. | The 1992 “Loss” definition was less prescriptive about the types of information to be considered. The 2002 standard compels a comprehensive survey of available data. |
| 2. Methodology Selection | Choose a valuation methodology that is appropriate for the terminated transactions and prevailing market conditions. | – Justification for the chosen model. – Evidence of consistency with market practice. | The 2002 agreement requires the procedure to be commercially reasonable, not just the result. This means the choice of methodology itself is subject to scrutiny. |
| 3. Calculation and Documentation | Perform the calculation and meticulously document every step of the process. | – A detailed record of all data used. – The specific calculations performed. – The identity of any third parties consulted. – An explanation of how the final Close-Out Amount was determined. | This level of documentation is critical under the 2002 Agreement to demonstrate that the process was commercially reasonable. |
| 4. Application of Set-Off | Once the net Close-Out Amount is determined, apply the set-off right under Section 6(f). | – A clear accounting of all amounts owed between the parties, both under the ISDA and otherwise. – A final statement showing the net payment due after set-off. | The clearer language of the 2002 set-off clause provides stronger operational justification for combining debts from different sources. |

![A precision-engineered metallic component with a central circular mechanism, secured by fasteners, embodies a Prime RFQ engine. It drives institutional liquidity and high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives, facilitating atomic settlement of block trades and private quotation within market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-platform-rfq-engine-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-atomic-settlement-of-block-trades.jpg)

## What Is the Practical Effect of the Set off Clause?

The refined language of Section 6(f) in the 2002 Agreement provides a superior execution framework. The explicit statement that the set-off right is “in addition to, and not in limitation of, any other” similar rights is designed to preempt legal arguments that the contractual set-off displaces other available remedies, such as statutory or equitable set-off rights. In a complex, cross-border insolvency, where different legal regimes may apply, this strengthened language provides the non-defaulting party with a more resilient claim. It allows its legal counsel to argue that the ISDA set-off is a distinct, contractually agreed-upon right that co-exists with any other remedies available under the governing law or the laws of the jurisdiction where the defaulting party is located.

![A transparent central hub with precise, crossing blades symbolizes institutional RFQ protocol execution. This abstract mechanism depicts price discovery and algorithmic execution for digital asset derivatives, showcasing liquidity aggregation, market microstructure efficiency, and best execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-platform-microstructure.jpg)

## Case Law and the Commercially Reasonable Standard

The English High Court case of Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc. v. National Power Corporation provided a crucial judicial interpretation of the “commercially reasonable” standard in the 2002 Agreement. The court confirmed that this standard is more stringent than the test of rationality applied to the 1992 “Loss” definition. It is an objective test.

The non-defaulting party must demonstrate that it acted in a manner that an objective, reasonable party in its position would have. This has direct operational consequences:

- 
**Internal Procedures** ▴ Institutions must have pre-defined, documented procedures for handling close-outs. Relying on ad-hoc decisions during a crisis is insufficient.

- 
**Record Keeping** ▴ The ability to produce a clear audit trail of the valuation process is paramount. This includes saving all relevant market data, internal communications, and model outputs.

- 
**Expertise** ▴ The personnel responsible for the calculation must be knowledgeable and able to justify their decisions based on accepted market practices.

Ultimately, the execution of the 2002 Agreement’s close-out and set-off provisions is a more demanding but also a more certain process. It replaces the subjective flexibility of the 1992 “Loss” definition with a framework of objective, procedural reasonableness. For a well-prepared institution, this architectural upgrade provides a more reliable and defensible system for managing the critical financial consequences of a counterparty default.

![Two intersecting technical arms, one opaque metallic and one transparent blue with internal glowing patterns, pivot around a central hub. This symbolizes a Principal's RFQ protocol engine, enabling high-fidelity execution and price discovery for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-grade-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine.jpg)

## References

- Fitch, C. (2003). The 2002 ISDA Master Agreement. Duke Law Journal, 53(2), 859-881.

- International Swaps and Derivatives Association. (2002). 2002 ISDA Master Agreement. New York, NY ▴ ISDA.

- International Swaps and Derivatives Association. (1992). 1992 ISDA Master Agreement. New York,NY ▴ ISDA.

- Raima, K. (2018). ISDA Master Agreement Close-out Provisions ▴ English Courts Highlight a Difference Between the 1992 and 2002 Versions. Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP.

- Kenyon, A. & Liberto, M. (2021). Comparison of 1992 and 2002 ISDA® Master Agreements. Practical Law, Thomson Reuters.

![A curved grey surface anchors a translucent blue disk, pierced by a sharp green financial instrument and two silver stylus elements. This visualizes a precise RFQ protocol for institutional digital asset derivatives, enabling liquidity aggregation, high-fidelity execution, price discovery, and algorithmic trading within market microstructure via a Principal's operational framework](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-high-fidelity-execution-via-rfq-protocols-optimizing-market-microstructure-and-price-discovery.jpg)

## Reflection

The evolution from the 1992 to the [2002 ISDA](https://prime.greeks.live/area/2002-isda/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) Master Agreement provides a clear lesson in financial engineering. It demonstrates a market-wide effort to learn from systemic failures and to build more resilient infrastructure. The changes to the close-out calculation and the set-off provision are not merely legalistic tweaks; they represent a fundamental shift in the allocation of risk and responsibility. The system now demands a higher degree of procedural rigor and objectivity from its participants.

As you assess your own institution’s operational framework, consider whether your internal protocols for counterparty default are designed to meet the more demanding, yet more certain, standards of this evolved architecture. The strength of your legal documentation is only as robust as the operational capacity you have to execute upon its terms in a moment of crisis.

![A sleek, metallic multi-lens device with glowing blue apertures symbolizes an advanced RFQ protocol engine. Its precision optics enable real-time market microstructure analysis and high-fidelity execution, facilitating automated price discovery and aggregated inquiry within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-intelligence-layer.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/swaps-and-derivatives/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Precision-engineered institutional-grade Prime RFQ modules connect via intricate hardware, embodying robust RFQ protocols for digital asset derivatives. This underlying market microstructure enables high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement, optimizing capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/precision-engineered-prime-os-modules-enabling-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-for-best-execution.jpg)

## Swaps and Derivatives

Meaning ▴ Swaps and derivatives are financial instruments whose valuation is intrinsically linked to an underlying asset, index, or rate, primarily utilized by institutional participants to manage systemic risk, execute directional market views, or gain synthetic exposure to diverse markets without direct asset ownership. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/master-agreement/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![The image depicts two intersecting structural beams, symbolizing a robust Prime RFQ framework for institutional digital asset derivatives. These elements represent interconnected liquidity pools and execution pathways, crucial for high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement within market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-cross-market-execution-architecture-for-digital-assets.jpg)

## Master Agreement

Meaning ▴ The Master Agreement is a foundational legal contract establishing a comprehensive framework for all subsequent transactions between two parties. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/counterparty-default/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precision mechanism, potentially a component of a Crypto Derivatives OS, showcases intricate Market Microstructure for High-Fidelity Execution. Transparent elements suggest Price Discovery and Latent Liquidity within RFQ Protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-crypto-derivatives-rfq-engine-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Counterparty Default

Meaning ▴ Counterparty Default refers to the failure of a party to a financial transaction to fulfill its contractual obligations, such as delivering assets, making payments, or settling positions. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/non-defaulting-party/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Two intertwined, reflective, metallic structures with translucent teal elements at their core, converging on a central nexus against a dark background. This represents a sophisticated RFQ protocol facilitating price discovery within digital asset derivatives markets, denoting high-fidelity execution and institutional-grade systems optimizing capital efficiency via latent liquidity and smart order routing across dark pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-system-architecture.jpg)

## Non-Defaulting Party

Meaning ▴ The Non-Defaulting Party designates the entity within a bilateral or multilateral contractual agreement, particularly in digital asset derivatives, that remains in full compliance with its obligations and terms when a counterparty fails to meet its own, thereby triggering a default event. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/set-off-provision/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A polished Prime RFQ surface frames a glowing blue sphere, symbolizing a deep liquidity pool. Its precision fins suggest algorithmic price discovery and high-fidelity execution within an RFQ protocol](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-intelligence.jpg)

## Set-Off Provision

Meaning ▴ A Set-Off Provision constitutes a contractual or statutory right allowing a party to net mutual debts or claims owed to and by another party, thereby reducing the aggregate gross exposure to a single net amount. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/2002-isda-master-agreement/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Central blue-grey modular components precisely interconnect, flanked by two off-white units. This visualizes an institutional grade RFQ protocol hub, enabling high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-core-interconnect-for-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## 2002 Isda Master Agreement

Meaning ▴ The 2002 ISDA Master Agreement represents a standardized bilateral contractual framework for over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives transactions. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/close-out-amount/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A diagonal metallic framework supports two dark circular elements with blue rims, connected by a central oval interface. This represents an institutional-grade RFQ protocol for digital asset derivatives, facilitating block trade execution, high-fidelity execution, dark liquidity, and atomic settlement on a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/optimized-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-system-rfq-protocols-and-atomic-settlement.jpg)

## Close-Out Amount

Meaning ▴ The Close-Out Amount represents the definitive financial value required to terminate a derivatives contract or position, typically calculated upon a default event or a pre-defined termination trigger. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/market-quotation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A cutaway reveals the intricate market microstructure of an institutional-grade platform. Internal components signify algorithmic trading logic, supporting high-fidelity execution via a streamlined RFQ protocol for aggregated inquiry and price discovery within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-execution-for-digital-asset-derivatives-via-rfq-protocols.jpg)

## Market Quotation

Meaning ▴ A market quotation represents the current executable bid and ask prices for a specific financial instrument, typically accompanied by the corresponding tradable sizes or market depth at various price levels. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/defaulting-party/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract geometric forms converge at a central point, symbolizing institutional digital asset derivatives trading. This depicts RFQ protocol aggregation and price discovery across diverse liquidity pools, ensuring high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-microstructure-core-liquidity-hub.jpg)

## Defaulting Party

Meaning ▴ A Defaulting Party refers to any participant within a financial agreement, particularly in the context of institutional digital asset derivatives, that fails to fulfill its contractual obligations. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/commercially-reasonable-procedures/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Angular dark planes frame luminous turquoise pathways converging centrally. This visualizes institutional digital asset derivatives market microstructure, highlighting RFQ protocols for private quotation and high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-rfq-protocols-for-institutional-digital-assets.jpg)

## Commercially Reasonable Procedures

Meaning ▴ Commercially Reasonable Procedures defines the standard of conduct for actions taken within a financial context, mandating diligence and adherence to prevailing market practices and conditions. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/commercially-reasonable/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A translucent, faceted sphere, representing a digital asset derivative block trade, traverses a precision-engineered track. This signifies high-fidelity execution via an RFQ protocol, optimizing liquidity aggregation, price discovery, and capital efficiency within institutional market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-block-trade-high-fidelity-execution-protocol-prime-os-path.jpg)

## Commercially Reasonable

Meaning ▴ Commercially Reasonable refers to actions, terms, or conditions that a prudent party would undertake or accept in a similar business context, aiming to achieve a desired outcome efficiently and effectively while considering prevailing market conditions, industry practices, and available alternatives. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/force-majeure/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precision-engineered apparatus with a luminous green beam, symbolizing a Prime RFQ for institutional digital asset derivatives. It facilitates high-fidelity execution via optimized RFQ protocols, ensuring precise price discovery and mitigating counterparty risk within market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

## Force Majeure

Meaning ▴ Force Majeure designates a contractual clause excusing parties from fulfilling their obligations due to extraordinary events beyond their reasonable control, such as natural disasters, acts of war, or government prohibitions, which render performance impossible or commercially impracticable. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-practical-effect-of-an-automatic-stay-in-bankruptcy-on-a-creditors-right-of-set-off/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract visual representing an advanced RFQ system for institutional digital asset derivatives. It depicts a central principal platform orchestrating algorithmic execution across diverse liquidity pools, facilitating precise market microstructure interactions for best execution and potential atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-platform-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-ecosystem.jpg)

## Set-Off Right

The automatic stay suspends a creditor's right of setoff, converting it into a court-supervised process requiring a motion for relief. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/isda-master-agreement/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Four sleek, rounded, modular components stack, symbolizing a multi-layered institutional digital asset derivatives trading system. Each unit represents a critical Prime RFQ layer, facilitating high-fidelity execution, aggregated inquiry, and sophisticated market microstructure for optimal price discovery via RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/modular-institutional-crypto-derivatives-trading-system-components.jpg)

## Isda Master Agreement

Meaning ▴ The ISDA Master Agreement is a standardized contractual framework for privately negotiated over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives transactions, establishing common terms for a wide array of financial instruments. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/2002-isda/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Sleek, off-white cylindrical module with a dark blue recessed oval interface. This represents a Principal's Prime RFQ gateway for institutional digital asset derivatives, facilitating private quotation protocol for block trade execution, ensuring high-fidelity price discovery and capital efficiency through low-latency liquidity aggregation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-portal-optimal-institutional-digital-asset-execution.jpg)

## 2002 Isda

Meaning ▴ The 2002 ISDA Master Agreement constitutes a standardized contractual framework, widely adopted within the over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives market, establishing foundational terms for bilateral derivatives transactions. </a>

**Tags:** [OTC Derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/area/otc-derivatives/), [2002 ISDA Master Agreement](https://options.greeks.live/area/2002-isda-master-agreement/), [Force Majeure](https://options.greeks.live/area/force-majeure/), [Counterparty Default](https://options.greeks.live/area/counterparty-default/), [Master Agreement](https://options.greeks.live/area/master-agreement/), [Swaps and Derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/area/swaps-and-derivatives/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [How Does the Force Majeure Clause in the 2002 ISDA Agreement Affect Counterparty Obligations?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-force-majeure-clause-in-the-2002-isda-agreement-affect-counterparty-obligations/)
![Abstract geometric forms, symbolizing bilateral quotation and multi-leg spread components, precisely interact with robust institutional-grade infrastructure. This represents a Crypto Derivatives OS facilitating high-fidelity execution via an RFQ workflow, optimizing capital efficiency and price discovery.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-infrastructure.jpg)

The 2002 ISDA Force Majeure clause provides a structured protocol to terminate derivatives when external events make performance impossible.

- 
### [What Is the Strategic Importance of the Early Termination Date in a Derivatives Dispute?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-strategic-importance-of-the-early-termination-date-in-a-derivatives-dispute/)
![A teal sphere with gold bands, symbolizing a discrete digital asset derivative block trade, rests on a precision electronic trading platform. This illustrates granular market microstructure and high-fidelity execution within an RFQ protocol, driven by a Prime RFQ intelligence layer.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivative-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-execution-platform-microstructure-intelligence-layer.jpg)

The Early Termination Date is a strategic trigger that crystallizes all derivative exposures into a single, net monetary claim.

- 
### [How Does the Close-Out Amount in the 2002 ISDA Agreement Improve upon the 1992 Version?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-close-out-amount-in-the-2002-isda-agreement-improve-upon-the-1992-version/)
![A sleek, institutional-grade Prime RFQ component features intersecting transparent blades with a glowing core. This visualizes a precise RFQ execution engine, enabling high-fidelity execution and dynamic price discovery for digital asset derivatives, optimizing market microstructure for capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-for-best-execution-microstructure.jpg)

The 2002 ISDA Agreement replaces subjective valuation with an objective, commercially reasonable standard, enhancing systemic stability.

- 
### [What Are the Primary Legal Risks in a 1992 ISDA Closeout?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-legal-risks-in-a-1992-isda-closeout/)
![A precision-engineered metallic cross-structure, embodying an RFQ engine's market microstructure, showcases diverse elements. One granular arm signifies aggregated liquidity pools and latent liquidity. The opposing perforated arm represents high-fidelity execution and algorithmic trading parameters. Its central pivot symbolizes atomic settlement within institutional digital asset derivatives.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-rfq-engine-microstructure-for-atomic-settlement.jpg)

The primary legal risks in a 1992 ISDA closeout center on the enforceability of netting and the calculation of the final settlement amount.

- 
### [How Does the Close-Out Amount Calculation Differ between the 1992 and 2002 ISDA Agreements?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-close-out-amount-calculation-differ-between-the-1992-and-2002-isda-agreements/)
![Central reflective hub with radiating metallic rods and layered translucent blades. This visualizes an RFQ protocol engine, symbolizing the Prime RFQ orchestrating multi-dealer liquidity for institutional digital asset derivatives. It ensures high-fidelity execution, transparent price discovery, and atomic settlement within complex market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-digital-asset-rfq-execution-and-liquidity-management.jpg)

The 2002 ISDA Agreement replaced the 1992 version's subjective "Loss" calculation with an objective "Close-Out Amount" standard.

- 
### [What Are the Primary Legal and Operational Risks of Remaining on the 1992 ISDA Master Agreement?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-legal-and-operational-risks-of-remaining-on-the-1992-isda-master-agreement/)
![A central glowing blue mechanism with a precision reticle is encased by dark metallic panels. This symbolizes an institutional-grade Principal's operational framework for high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives. It embodies RFQ processing, enabling price discovery within a deep liquidity pool, optimizing market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-core-enabling-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution.jpg)

Reliance on the 1992 ISDA embeds legal ambiguity and operational friction into a firm's core risk architecture.

- 
### [What Are the Primary Differences in Collateral Rights between the 1992 and 2002 ISDA Forms?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-differences-in-collateral-rights-between-the-1992-and-2002-isda-forms/)
![Two off-white elliptical components separated by a dark, central mechanism. This embodies an RFQ protocol for institutional digital asset derivatives, enabling price discovery for block trades, ensuring high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency within a Prime RFQ for dark liquidity.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-4.jpg)

The 2002 ISDA enhances collateral rights via a flexible "Close-out Amount" and mandatory two-way payments for greater valuation certainty.

- 
### [What Are the Key Differences between Market Quotation and Close-Out Amount Valuation Methods?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-between-market-quotation-and-close-out-amount-valuation-methods/)
![A sleek, spherical intelligence layer component with internal blue mechanics and a precision lens. It embodies a Principal's private quotation system, driving high-fidelity execution and price discovery for digital asset derivatives through RFQ protocols, optimizing market microstructure and minimizing latency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/principals-private-quotation-system-intelligence-layer-component.jpg)

Market Quotation is a rigid, quote-driven valuation, while Close-Out Amount is a flexible, principles-based method for derivatives.

- 
### [How Does the Close out Amount Calculation Differ from Market Quotation and Loss?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-close-out-amount-calculation-differ-from-market-quotation-and-loss/)
![Abstract layers in grey, mint green, and deep blue visualize a Principal's operational framework for institutional digital asset derivatives. The textured grey signifies market microstructure, while the mint green layer with precise slots represents RFQ protocol parameters, enabling high-fidelity execution, private quotation, capital efficiency, and atomic settlement.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-layered-rfq-protocol-for-digital-asset-execution-system.jpg)

The Close-Out Amount calculation is a flexible, principles-based valuation system superseding the rigid Market Quotation and subjective Loss methods.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "How Does the 2002 ISDA Set off Differ from the 1992 Agreement?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-2002-isda-set-off-differ-from-the-1992-agreement/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-2002-isda-set-off-differ-from-the-1992-agreement/"
    },
    "headline": "How Does the 2002 ISDA Set off Differ from the 1992 Agreement? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "The 2002 ISDA Agreement enhances set-off certainty by replacing subjective valuation with a commercially reasonable, objective standard. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-2002-isda-set-off-differ-from-the-1992-agreement/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-04T10:11:56+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-08-04T10:11:57+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/robust-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-platform-for-optimized-rfq-protocol-execution-and-deep-liquidity-access.jpg",
        "caption": "The image portrays a sophisticated, multi-layered system of brushed metal and clear glass, emblematic of an Institutional Grade Prime RFQ. This architecture underscores the robust framework for Digital Asset Derivatives, enabling high-fidelity execution of complex multi-leg spread strategies via optimized RFQ protocols. Transparent surfaces signify efficient price discovery and access to deep liquidity pools, while the system's precision mitigates counterparty risk and enhances capital efficiency through atomic settlement, critical for advanced market microstructure."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "1992 ISDA Master Agreement",
        "2002 ISDA",
        "2002 ISDA Master Agreement",
        "Close-Out Amount",
        "Close-Out Netting",
        "Commercially Reasonable",
        "Commercially Reasonable Procedures",
        "Counterparty Default",
        "Defaulting Party",
        "Financial Risk Management",
        "Force Majeure",
        "Force Majeure Termination Event",
        "ISDA Master Agreement",
        "Market Quotation",
        "Master Agreement",
        "Non-Defaulting Party",
        "OTC Derivatives",
        "Section 6(F)",
        "Set-Off Provision",
        "Swaps and Derivatives"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "FAQPage",
    "mainEntity": [
        {
            "@type": "Question",
            "name": "How Does Force Majeure Impact Termination Rights?",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "@type": "Answer",
                "text": "A significant addition in the 2002 Agreement is the \"Force Majeure\" Termination Event. This provision addresses situations where external events beyond a party's control (such as natural disasters, political turmoil, or the imposition of capital controls) make performance impossible or illegal. Under the 1992 Agreement, such scenarios could lead to legal uncertainty, potentially leaving parties locked in trades for extended periods. The 2002 version provides a clear, structured pathway to terminate affected transactions after a waiting period, thereby preventing the indefinite accumulation of risk. Strategically, this is a vital enhancement for institutions with significant cross-border exposure, as it provides a contractual mechanism for managing sovereign and political risks that were not explicitly addressed in the earlier framework."
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Question",
            "name": "What Is The Practical Effect Of The Set Off Clause?",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "@type": "Answer",
                "text": "The refined language of Section 6(f) in the 2002 Agreement provides a superior execution framework. The explicit statement that the set-off right is \"in addition to, and not in limitation of, any other\" similar rights is designed to preempt legal arguments that the contractual set-off displaces other available remedies, such as statutory or equitable set-off rights. In a complex, cross-border insolvency, where different legal regimes may apply, this strengthened language provides the non-defaulting party with a more resilient claim. It allows its legal counsel to argue that the ISDA set-off is a distinct, contractually agreed-upon right that co-exists with any other remedies available under the governing law or the laws of the jurisdiction where the defaulting party is located."
            }
        }
    ]
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-2002-isda-set-off-differ-from-the-1992-agreement/
