# How Does the Close-Out Amount Calculation Differ from the 1992 Loss and Market Quotation Methods? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-05
**Categories:** Question

---

![A sleek, spherical intelligence layer component with internal blue mechanics and a precision lens. It embodies a Principal's private quotation system, driving high-fidelity execution and price discovery for digital asset derivatives through RFQ protocols, optimizing market microstructure and minimizing latency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/principals-private-quotation-system-intelligence-layer-component.jpg)

![A sophisticated metallic mechanism with integrated translucent teal pathways on a dark background. This abstract visualizes the intricate market microstructure of an institutional digital asset derivatives platform, specifically the RFQ engine facilitating private quotation and block trade execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/systemic-framework-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-price-discovery-and-atomic-settlement.jpg)

## Concept

The architecture of any robust financial agreement rests upon its protocols for dissolution under stress. Within the institutional derivatives market, the [ISDA Master Agreement](https://prime.greeks.live/area/isda-master-agreement/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) provides the foundational operating system for managing counterparty relationships. A critical component of this system is the mechanism for calculating a final settlement value when a default or other termination event occurs.

The evolution from the 1992 ISDA [Master Agreement](https://prime.greeks.live/area/master-agreement/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)’s dual methodologies of Loss and Market Quotation to the 2002 ISDA’s unified Close-Out Amount represents a significant upgrade in the system’s logic, driven by the hard lessons of market crises. Understanding this evolution is central to grasping the mechanics of modern [counterparty risk](https://prime.greeks.live/area/counterparty-risk/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) management.

The 1992 Agreement presented counterparties with a choice between two distinct valuation philosophies. [Market Quotation](https://prime.greeks.live/area/market-quotation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) was an attempt at a purely objective, market-based procedure. It required the [non-defaulting party](https://prime.greeks.live/area/non-defaulting-party/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) to obtain quotes from leading market makers for a replacement transaction that would replicate the economics of the terminated trades.

This method’s design prioritized transparency and procedural rigor, operating under the assumption that a fair market price could be sourced externally, thus minimizing disputes. It was a mechanistic approach, reflecting a belief in the power of a defined, repeatable process to deliver a fair outcome.

The Loss method, conversely, was rooted in the legal principle of indemnification. It allowed the non-defaulting party to calculate, in [good faith](https://prime.greeks.live/area/good-faith/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), the sum of all its losses and costs resulting from the early termination. This was a more flexible and subjective approach.

It acknowledged that in complex or illiquid markets, obtaining a clean replacement quote might be impossible or might not fully capture the economic damage suffered. This method empowered the [determining party](https://prime.greeks.live/area/determining-party/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) to look beyond simple replacement costs to include factors like hedging unwind costs and other consequential damages, provided the calculation was [commercially reasonable](https://prime.greeks.live/area/commercially-reasonable/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite).

The introduction of the [Close-Out Amount](https://prime.greeks.live/area/close-out-amount/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) in the [2002 ISDA Master Agreement](https://prime.greeks.live/area/2002-isda-master-agreement/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) was a direct response to the systemic weaknesses revealed in the preceding methodologies, particularly during the market turmoil of the late 1990s. Market Quotation proved too rigid and often failed entirely in illiquid conditions, while the subjectivity of Loss could lead to protracted disputes. The Close-Out Amount is a synthesized methodology. It fuses the objectivity of market data with the comprehensive scope of an indemnity-based calculation.

It is a single, unified calculation standard that mandates a “commercially reasonable” determination, drawing from a wide array of potential inputs including quotes, relevant [market data](https://prime.greeks.live/area/market-data/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), and internal models. This unified approach was designed to be more resilient, flexible, and ultimately more equitable across a wider range of market conditions.

![Sleek, metallic, modular hardware with visible circuit elements, symbolizing the market microstructure for institutional digital asset derivatives. This low-latency infrastructure supports RFQ protocols, enabling high-fidelity execution for private quotation and block trade settlement, ensuring capital efficiency within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/market-microstructure-engine-for-crypto-derivatives-rfq-protocol.jpg)

![Abstract image showing interlocking metallic and translucent blue components, suggestive of a sophisticated RFQ engine. This depicts the precision of an institutional-grade Crypto Derivatives OS, facilitating high-fidelity execution and optimal price discovery within complex market microstructure for multi-leg spreads and atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-market-microstructure-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq.jpg)

## Strategy

The strategic decision between Market Quotation and Loss in the [1992 ISDA](https://prime.greeks.live/area/1992-isda/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) framework was a foundational element of counterparty negotiation, reflecting a firm’s risk appetite, its market position, and its forecast of which party was more likely to be the non-defaulting entity in a termination scenario. The choice was a calculated one, with each path presenting a distinct set of operational and legal risks.

> The selection of a close-out methodology under the 1992 ISDA was a strategic trade-off between procedural objectivity and calculative flexibility.

Opting for Market Quotation was a strategy of procedural defense. A party that believed it might be the one to default would favor this method. Its appeal lay in its prescriptive nature. The process of obtaining at least three quotes from major dealers and (typically) discarding any outliers created a transparent, auditable trail.

This structure was designed to constrain the non-defaulting party’s discretion, preventing an aggressive or punitive calculation. However, this rigidity was also its primary strategic weakness. In times of systemic stress, reference dealers might refuse to provide quotes, or the quotes provided might be for transaction sizes far smaller than the terminated portfolio, rendering the process unworkable and forcing a fallback to the Loss method anyway.

![A precision mechanism with a central circular core and a linear element extending to a sharp tip, encased in translucent material. This symbolizes an institutional RFQ protocol's market microstructure, enabling high-fidelity execution and price discovery for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-microstructure-facilitating-optimal-price-discovery-and-best-execution.jpg)

## What Are the Strategic Failures of Market Quotation?

The Market Quotation methodology, despite its intention to provide objective valuation, contained inherent strategic flaws that became apparent during market crises. Its reliance on external dealer quotes created significant vulnerabilities:

- **Systemic Correlation Risk** ▴ The very event causing a default (e.g. a major credit crisis) is often correlated with a market-wide withdrawal of liquidity. This means that at the precise moment quotes are needed most, the reference dealers are least likely to provide them, causing the entire mechanism to fail.

- **Adverse Selection in Quoting** ▴ Dealers providing quotes have no obligation to transact at those prices. They may provide quotes that are deliberately wide or skewed, knowing they are pricing a distressed situation for a competitor. This introduces a layer of strategic gamesmanship into what was intended as an objective process.

- **Inapplicability to Complex Portfolios** ▴ The methodology struggles with large, complex, or illiquid portfolios of derivatives. It is often impossible to find a dealer willing or able to quote a single replacement for a multi-faceted portfolio, forcing a piecemeal and often inaccurate valuation.

The Loss methodology represented a strategy of empowered recovery. It was favored by institutions that perceived themselves as more likely to be the non-defaulting party. This method provided the flexibility to construct a comprehensive assessment of damages that a simple replacement quote might miss. This could include the costs of unwinding complex hedges, internal funding costs, and administrative expenses associated with managing the default.

The core of this strategy was the principle of making the non-defaulting party economically whole. The primary strategic risk, of course, was the potential for legal challenges. The “good faith” and “commercially reasonable” standards were subjective, opening the door for the defaulting party to dispute the calculation in court, leading to costly and time-consuming litigation.

![Polished opaque and translucent spheres intersect sharp metallic structures. This abstract composition represents advanced RFQ protocols for institutional digital asset derivatives, illustrating multi-leg spread execution, latent liquidity aggregation, and high-fidelity execution within principal-driven trading environments](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-optimal-execution-orchestration.jpg)

## The Close-Out Amount a Unified Strategic Framework

The [2002 ISDA](https://prime.greeks.live/area/2002-isda/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)’s Close-Out Amount discards the binary choice and institutes a single, more sophisticated strategic framework. This framework is designed to be antifragile, adapting to market conditions rather than breaking under them. It internalizes the lessons from the failures of its predecessors by building a hierarchy of valuation inputs while maintaining a core standard of commercial reasonableness. The strategy is no longer about choosing between objectivity and flexibility; it is about executing a commercially reasonable process that can be defended with robust evidence.

This unified approach shifts the strategic focus from pre-negotiating a rigid method to ensuring the firm’s internal valuation and risk management systems are capable of executing a defensible Close-Out Amount calculation. The determining party has the authority to use a blend of information sources ▴ internal models, third-party vendor prices, dealer quotes, and relevant market data ▴ to arrive at a valuation. This provides the flexibility to handle illiquid products or stressed markets where quotes are unavailable, while the overarching requirement of commercial reasonableness acts as a check on punitive or arbitrary calculations.

The table below provides a strategic comparison of the three methodologies, viewed through the lens of a risk manager.

| Attribute | Market Quotation (1992) | Loss (1992) | Close-Out Amount (2002) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Primary Strategic Goal | Achieve objectivity and transparency through a rigid, external process. | Achieve full economic indemnification for the non-defaulting party. | Achieve a fair and resilient valuation using all commercially reasonable information. |
| Flexibility in Valuation | Very low. Prescribes a specific procedure for obtaining external quotes. | Very high. Allows the determining party to calculate its total gains and losses. | High. Permits use of quotes, market data, and internal models. |
| Performance in Illiquid Markets | Poor. The mechanism frequently fails when quotes are unavailable. | Effective. The calculation is not dependent on external quotes. | Robust. Designed to function by using alternative data sources when quotes are absent. |
| Primary Legal Risk | Procedural failure and inability to complete the prescribed process. | Disputes over the “reasonableness” and “good faith” of the calculation. | Disputes over whether the process and outcome were “commercially reasonable”. |
| Favored By | Parties more likely to be in default, seeking transparency. | Parties more likely to be non-defaulting, seeking flexibility. | Became the single standard, balancing the interests of both parties. |

![An abstract digital interface features a dark circular screen with two luminous dots, one teal and one grey, symbolizing active and pending private quotation statuses within an RFQ protocol. Below, sharp parallel lines in black, beige, and grey delineate distinct liquidity pools and execution pathways for multi-leg spread strategies, reflecting market microstructure and high-fidelity execution for institutional grade digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-displaying-multi-leg-execution-status-and-optimal-liquidity-pathways.jpg)

![Abstract forms depict interconnected institutional liquidity pools and intricate market microstructure. Sharp algorithmic execution paths traverse smooth aggregated inquiry surfaces, symbolizing high-fidelity execution within a Principal's operational framework](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-prime-os-1.jpg)

## Execution

The execution of a close-out calculation is a critical operational process that demands precision, robust documentation, and a clear understanding of the governing legal standard. The shift from the 1992 methodologies to the 2002 Close-Out Amount represents a move from rigid procedural execution or subjective loss assessment to a more dynamic, evidence-based valuation process. A successful execution is one that not only arrives at a fair value but can also withstand intense legal scrutiny.

> A defensible close-out execution hinges on a disciplined, well-documented process that reflects a commercially reasonable approach to valuation.

![A transparent glass sphere rests precisely on a metallic rod, connecting a grey structural element and a dark teal engineered module with a clear lens. This symbolizes atomic settlement of digital asset derivatives via private quotation within a Prime RFQ, showcasing high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency for RFQ protocols and liquidity aggregation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/architecting-high-fidelity-execution-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-and-systemic-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## The Market Quotation Execution Protocol

Executing a close-out under the Market Quotation standard is a procedural exercise. The non-defaulting party must follow a series of prescribed steps. Failure to adhere to this protocol can invalidate the entire calculation.

- **Identify Reference Market-Makers** ▴ The first step is to identify at least three, and ideally four or five, leading dealers in the relevant market for the terminated transactions, as stipulated in the ISDA Schedule.

- **Solicit Quotations** ▴ The non-defaulting party must request quotes from these dealers for a transaction that would have the economic effect of preserving the material terms of the terminated transactions. The request must specify the size, maturity, and key economic terms.

- **Receive and Document Quotes** ▴ All quotes received must be documented meticulously, including the time they were received and the name of the individual at the dealer who provided them. The quotes are for the cost of entering into a replacement trade.

- **Apply the Calculation Method** ▴ Typically, if four or more quotes are received, the highest and lowest are discarded, and the remaining are averaged. If three quotes are received, they are averaged. If fewer than three quotes are obtained, the process fails, and the calculation typically falls back to the Loss method.

- **Calculate the [Settlement Amount](https://prime.greeks.live/area/settlement-amount/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)** ▴ The resulting average is the Settlement Amount for the terminated transactions. This is then combined with any unpaid amounts to determine the final figure owed.

![A complex, multi-layered electronic component with a central connector and fine metallic probes. This represents a critical Prime RFQ module for institutional digital asset derivatives trading, enabling high-fidelity execution of RFQ protocols, price discovery, and atomic settlement for multi-leg spreads with minimal latency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-engine-driving-best-execution-and-liquidity.jpg)

## Executing a Loss Calculation

The execution of a [Loss calculation](https://prime.greeks.live/area/loss-calculation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is an exercise in forensic accounting and economic analysis. The non-defaulting party has broad discretion, but this discretion is governed by the principles of good faith and reasonableness. The key is to build a comprehensive and justifiable claim.

The process involves identifying and quantifying all costs and losses directly attributable to the counterparty’s default. This requires a detailed breakdown of damages, which must be supported by internal records, market data, and a clear narrative.

| Loss Component | Description | Evidentiary Support | Hypothetical Value |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Replacement Cost | The cost of entering into a new transaction or series of transactions to replace the terminated portfolio. | Broker confirmations, term sheets for replacement trades, market data showing prevailing levels. | $1,250,000 |
| Hedging Unwind Costs | The realized losses or costs incurred from liquidating or adjusting hedges that were in place to offset the risk of the terminated transactions. | Trade tickets for hedge unwinds, market data at the time of unwind, internal risk management reports. | $375,000 |
| Cost of Funding | The costs associated with funding the replacement of any collateral or margin that is not returned by the defaulting party. | Internal treasury reports, prevailing money market rates, evidence of collateral shortfall. | $55,000 |
| Administrative Costs | Reasonable legal and administrative expenses incurred in the process of managing the default and close-out. | Legal invoices, records of internal staff time allocated to the default. | $20,000 |
| Total Loss | The aggregate of all documented losses and costs. | Consolidated report with all supporting documentation. | $1,700,000 |

![Abstract interconnected modules with glowing turquoise cores represent an Institutional Grade RFQ system for Digital Asset Derivatives. Each module signifies a Liquidity Pool or Price Discovery node, facilitating High-Fidelity Execution and Atomic Settlement within a Prime RFQ Intelligence Layer, optimizing Capital Efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-market-microstructure.jpg)

## How Is the Close-Out Amount Execution Engine Superior?

The execution of the 2002 ISDA’s Close-Out Amount is a more sophisticated process that synthesizes elements of both prior methods into a single, robust engine. The core executive principle is the creation of a “commercially reasonable” valuation through a defensible and transparent process. This requires the determining party to act as a rational market participant seeking to mitigate its losses in an efficient manner.

> The Close-Out Amount calculation is an evidence-based valuation exercise, not a mere procedural checklist.

The execution involves gathering and weighing various types of information. The ISDA definition explicitly allows for the use of:

- **Quotations** ▴ Unlike Market Quotation, there is no rigid requirement for a specific number of quotes. A single quote can be sufficient if it is commercially reasonable. The quotes do not have to be from dealers of the “highest credit standing.”

- **Market Data** ▴ This is a broad category that includes any relevant information from third-party sources, such as pricing services (e.g. Bloomberg, Reuters), exchange prices for similar instruments, and broker-dealer runs.

- **Internal Models** ▴ The determining party can use its own internal valuation models, provided these models are used in the regular course of its business for valuing similar transactions. This is a critical provision for exotic or illiquid derivatives where no market exists.

The execution process must be documented at every stage. The determining party should create a “valuation file” that includes all the information considered, the reasons for relying on certain data points over others, and the final calculation methodology. This file becomes the primary piece of evidence to demonstrate that the firm acted in a commercially reasonable manner. The flexibility of the Close-Out Amount is its greatest strength, but it requires a disciplined and transparent execution to be legally resilient.

![Sleek, abstract system interface with glowing green lines symbolizing RFQ pathways and high-fidelity execution. This visualizes market microstructure for institutional digital asset derivatives, emphasizing private quotation and dark liquidity within a Prime RFQ framework, enabling best execution and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocol-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

## References

- International Swaps and Derivatives Association. “1992 and 2002 ISDA Master Agreements Comparison.” ISDA, 2003.

- International Swaps and Derivatives Association. “2002 ISDA Master Agreement.” ISDA, 2002.

- International Swaps and Derivatives Association. “1992 ISDA Master Agreement.” ISDA, 1992.

- Henderson, Schuyler K. Henderson on Derivatives. 2nd ed. LexisNexis, 2011.

- Gregory, Jon. The xVA Challenge ▴ Counterparty Credit Risk, Funding, Collateral, and Capital. 4th ed. Wiley, 2020.

- Flavell, Antony. Swaps and Other Derivatives. 2nd ed. Wiley, 2002.

- Mengle, David. “The Importance of Close-out Netting.” ISDA Research Note, no. 1, 2010.

- Firth, Richard. “A Legal Analysis of the 2002 ISDA Master Agreement.” Law and Financial Markets Review, vol. 1, no. 2, 2007, pp. 151-159.

![A robust, dark metallic platform, indicative of an institutional-grade execution management system. Its precise, machined components suggest high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-platform-high-fidelity-price-discovery-and-atomic-settlement-infrastructure.jpg)

## Reflection

The evolution from Loss and Market Quotation to the unified Close-Out Amount is more than a technical update to a legal document. It reflects a maturation in the market’s understanding of risk itself. It signals a shift from rigid, procedural frameworks that fail under stress to more resilient, principles-based systems that empower rational actors.

The core question for any institution is whether its internal operational architecture ▴ its valuation models, its documentation protocols, its legal and risk functions ▴ is sufficiently robust to execute its rights and obligations under this advanced framework. The ISDA Master Agreement provides the code; a firm’s internal systems determine how effectively that code can be run.

![A macro view reveals a robust metallic component, signifying a critical interface within a Prime RFQ. This secure mechanism facilitates precise RFQ protocol execution, enabling atomic settlement for institutional-grade digital asset derivatives, embodying high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/core-secure-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-trade-system-element.jpg)

## How Does This Affect Your Counterparty Risk Framework?

Consider the inputs your own valuation systems rely upon. Are they diverse enough to produce a commercially reasonable result in a crisis? Is your documentation process disciplined enough to create an unassailable audit trail?

The strength of the Close-Out Amount lies in its flexibility, but that flexibility places a significant burden of proof on the calculating party. A robust internal framework is the ultimate source of a decisive operational edge in the event of a counterparty default.

![A sleek Principal's Operational Framework connects to a glowing, intricate teal ring structure. This depicts an institutional-grade RFQ protocol engine, facilitating high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives, enabling private quotation and optimal price discovery within market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-execution-engine-for-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/isda-master-agreement/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![An exposed institutional digital asset derivatives engine reveals its market microstructure. The polished disc represents a liquidity pool for price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system.jpg)

## Isda Master Agreement

Meaning ▴ The ISDA Master Agreement, while originating in traditional finance, serves as a crucial foundational legal framework for institutional participants engaging in over-the-counter (OTC) crypto derivatives trading and complex RFQ crypto transactions. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/counterparty-risk/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek Execution Management System diagonally spans segmented Market Microstructure, representing Prime RFQ for Institutional Grade Digital Asset Derivatives. It rests on two distinct Liquidity Pools, one facilitating RFQ Block Trade Price Discovery, the other a Dark Pool for Private Quotation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-optimizing-rfq-protocols-across-segmented-liquidity-pools.jpg)

## Counterparty Risk

Meaning ▴ Counterparty risk, within the domain of crypto investing and institutional options trading, represents the potential for financial loss arising from a counterparty's failure to fulfill its contractual obligations. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/master-agreement/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Precision cross-section of an institutional digital asset derivatives system, revealing intricate market microstructure. Toroidal halves represent interconnected liquidity pools, centrally driven by an RFQ protocol](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-architecture-revealing-precision-rfq-protocol-engine-for-optimal-high-fidelity-execution-and-latent-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## Master Agreement

Meaning ▴ A Master Agreement is a standardized, foundational legal contract that establishes the overarching terms and conditions governing all future transactions between two parties for specific financial instruments, such as derivatives or foreign exchange. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/non-defaulting-party/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precision execution pathway with an intelligence layer for price discovery, processing market microstructure data. A reflective block trade sphere signifies private quotation within a dark pool](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-precision-execution.jpg)

## Non-Defaulting Party

Meaning ▴ A Non-Defaulting Party refers to the participant in a financial contract, such as a derivatives agreement or lending facility within the crypto ecosystem, that has fully adhered to its obligations while the other party has failed to do so. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/market-quotation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A stylized depiction of institutional-grade digital asset derivatives RFQ execution. A central glowing liquidity pool for price discovery is precisely pierced by an algorithmic trading path, symbolizing high-fidelity execution and slippage minimization within market microstructure via a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-high-fidelity-execution-1.jpg)

## Market Quotation

Meaning ▴ A market quotation, or simply a quote, represents the most recent price at which an asset has traded or, more commonly in active markets, the current best bid and ask prices at which it can be immediately bought or sold. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/good-faith/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Visualizes the core mechanism of an institutional-grade RFQ protocol engine, highlighting its market microstructure precision. Metallic components suggest high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives, enabling private quotation and block trade processing](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-core-1.jpg)

## Good Faith

Meaning ▴ Good Faith, within the intricate and often trust-minimized architecture of crypto financial systems, denotes the principle of honest intent, fair dealing, and transparent conduct in all participant interactions and contractual agreements. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/commercially-reasonable/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A specialized hardware component, showcasing a robust metallic heat sink and intricate circuit board, symbolizes a Prime RFQ dedicated hardware module for institutional digital asset derivatives. It embodies market microstructure enabling high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols for block trade and multi-leg spread](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/prime-os-dedicated-hardware-for-institutional-rfq-execution.jpg)

## Commercially Reasonable

Meaning ▴ "Commercially Reasonable" is a legal and business standard requiring parties to a contract to act in a practical, prudent, and sensible manner, consistent with prevailing industry practices and good faith. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/determining-party/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A multi-faceted digital asset derivative, precisely calibrated on a sophisticated circular mechanism. This represents a Prime Brokerage's robust RFQ protocol for high-fidelity execution of multi-leg spreads, ensuring optimal price discovery and minimal slippage within complex market microstructure, critical for alpha generation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-precision-2.jpg)

## Determining Party

Meaning ▴ In the precise terminology of complex crypto financial instruments, particularly institutional options or structured products, the Determining Party is the pre-designated entity, whether an on-chain oracle or an agreed-upon off-chain agent, explicitly responsible for definitively calculating and announcing specific parameters, values, or conditions that critically influence the payoff, settlement, or lifecycle events of a contractual agreement. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/2002-isda-master-agreement/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A refined object featuring a translucent teal element, symbolizing a dynamic RFQ for Institutional Grade Digital Asset Derivatives. Its precision embodies High-Fidelity Execution and seamless Price Discovery within complex Market Microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-precision-for-optimal-execution-and-deep-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## 2002 Isda Master Agreement

Meaning ▴ The 2002 ISDA Master Agreement is the foundational legal document published by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, designed to standardize the contractual terms for privately negotiated (Over-the-Counter) derivatives transactions between two counterparties globally. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/close-out-amount/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, bimodal digital asset derivatives execution interface, partially open, revealing a dark, secure internal structure. This symbolizes high-fidelity execution and strategic price discovery via institutional RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-price-discovery.jpg)

## Close-Out Amount

Meaning ▴ The Close-Out Amount represents the aggregated net sum due between two parties upon the early termination or default of a master agreement, encompassing all outstanding obligations across multiple transactions. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/market-data/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract visualization of institutional RFQ protocol for digital asset derivatives. Translucent layers symbolize dark liquidity pools within complex market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine-6.jpg)

## Market Data

Meaning ▴ Market data in crypto investing refers to the real-time or historical information regarding prices, volumes, order book depth, and other relevant metrics across various digital asset trading venues. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/1992-isda/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Brushed metallic and colored modular components represent an institutional-grade Prime RFQ facilitating RFQ protocols for digital asset derivatives. The precise engineering signifies high-fidelity execution, atomic settlement, and capital efficiency within a sophisticated market microstructure for multi-leg spread trading](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-grade-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-execution-system.jpg)

## 1992 Isda

Meaning ▴ The 1992 ISDA Master Agreement, a foundational contractual framework developed by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, provides a standardized bilateral legal and operational structure for privately negotiated over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives transactions. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/2002-isda/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![An abstract composition featuring two overlapping digital asset liquidity pools, intersected by angular structures representing multi-leg RFQ protocols. This visualizes dynamic price discovery, high-fidelity execution, and aggregated liquidity within institutional-grade crypto derivatives OS, optimizing capital efficiency and mitigating counterparty risk](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-optimizing-aggregated-liquidity-and-multi-leg-execution-via-advanced-market-microstructure.jpg)

## 2002 Isda

Meaning ▴ The 2002 ISDA, or the 2002 ISDA Master Agreement, represents the prevailing global standard contractual framework developed by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association for documenting over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives transactions between two parties. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/settlement-amount/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A blue speckled marble, symbolizing a precise block trade, rests centrally on a translucent bar, representing a robust RFQ protocol. This structured geometric arrangement illustrates complex market microstructure, enabling high-fidelity execution, optimal price discovery, and efficient liquidity aggregation within a principal's operational framework for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-institutional-rfq-execution-framework-optimizing-digital-asset-derivatives-liquidity-aggregation-across-complex-market-microstructure.jpg)

## Settlement Amount

Meaning ▴ Settlement Amount, within the context of crypto trading and financial operations, refers to the final quantity of assets or fiat currency that is transferred between parties to conclude a transaction, fulfilling the obligations of a trade or contract. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/loss-calculation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precise lens-like module, symbolizing high-fidelity execution and market microstructure insight, rests on a sharp blade, representing optimal smart order routing. Curved surfaces depict distinct liquidity pools within an institutional-grade Prime RFQ, enabling efficient RFQ for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-via-rfq-protocols.jpg)

## Loss Calculation

Meaning ▴ Loss Calculation refers to the systematic determination of financial detriment incurred from trading activities, investment positions, or operational failures within the crypto ecosystem. </a>

**Tags:** [Swaps and Derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/area/swaps-and-derivatives/), [Early Termination Amount](https://options.greeks.live/area/early-termination-amount/), [1992 ISDA](https://options.greeks.live/area/1992-isda/), [Non-Defaulting Party](https://options.greeks.live/area/non-defaulting-party/), [Derivatives Close-Out](https://options.greeks.live/area/derivatives-close-out/), [Close-Out Amount](https://options.greeks.live/area/close-out-amount/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [How Does the Close out Amount Calculation in the 2002 Agreement Differ from the Loss Calculation in the 1992 Version?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-close-out-amount-calculation-in-the-2002-agreement-differ-from-the-loss-calculation-in-the-1992-version/)
![A focused view of a robust, beige cylindrical component with a dark blue internal aperture, symbolizing a high-fidelity execution channel. This element represents the core of an RFQ protocol system, enabling bespoke liquidity for Bitcoin Options and Ethereum Futures, minimizing slippage and information leakage.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-core-precision-component.jpg)

The 2002 Agreement's Close-Out Amount mandates an objective, commercially reasonable valuation, replacing the 1992's subjective Loss standard.

- 
### [How Does the 2002 Isda Master Agreement Differ from the 1992 Version regarding Close out Amounts?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-2002-isda-master-agreement-differ-from-the-1992-version-regarding-close-out-amounts/)
![A fractured, polished disc with a central, sharp conical element symbolizes fragmented digital asset liquidity. This Principal RFQ engine ensures high-fidelity execution, precise price discovery, and atomic settlement within complex market microstructure, optimizing capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-rfq-engine-unifying-fragmented-digital-asset-derivatives-liquidity-for-best-execution.jpg)

The 2002 ISDA replaces the 1992's subjective close-out methods with a unified, objectively reasonable standard for greater legal certainty.

- 
### [What Are the Primary Legal Risks When Determining a Derivatives Close out Amount?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-legal-risks-when-determining-a-derivatives-close-out-amount/)
![A central star-like form with sharp, metallic spikes intersects four teal planes, on black. This signifies an RFQ Protocol's precise Price Discovery and Liquidity Aggregation, enabling Algorithmic Execution for Multi-Leg Spread strategies, mitigating Counterparty Risk, and optimizing Capital Efficiency for institutional Digital Asset Derivatives.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-price-discovery-and-execution.jpg)

Determining a derivatives close-out amount is a legally fraught valuation of replacement costs, governed by a "commercially reasonable" standard.

- 
### [What Is the Legal Standard for “Commercially Reasonable Procedures” in a Derivatives Close-Out?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-legal-standard-for-commercially-reasonable-procedures-in-a-derivatives-close-out/)
![Detailed metallic disc, a Prime RFQ core, displays etched market microstructure. Its central teal dome, an intelligence layer, facilitates price discovery. Protruding rods signify low-latency RFQ protocol data transmission, ensuring high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-operating-system-intelligence-layer-powering-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-for-optimal-execution.jpg)

The legal standard for "commercially reasonable procedures" is an objective duty to employ a fair, verifiable, and market-based process to calculate a derivatives close-out value.

- 
### [Why Was the “First Method” or One-Way Payment System Removed in the 2002 ISDA Master Agreement?](https://options.greeks.live/question/why-was-the-first-method-or-one-way-payment-system-removed-in-the-2002-isda-master-agreement/)
![A central toroidal structure and intricate core are bisected by two blades: one algorithmic with circuits, the other solid. This symbolizes an institutional digital asset derivatives platform, leveraging RFQ protocols for high-fidelity execution and price discovery. It optimizes market microstructure for capital efficiency, managing multi-leg spreads and latent liquidity within a Principal's operational framework.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-hub-integrating-algorithmic-intelligence-for-high-fidelity-price-discovery-and-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

The First Method was removed to enforce equitable two-way payments, align with regulatory capital rules, and enhance overall market stability.

- 
### [How Does the Close-Out Amount in the 2002 ISDA Improve upon the 1992 Methodologies?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-close-out-amount-in-the-2002-isda-improve-upon-the-1992-methodologies/)
![A metallic, circular mechanism, a precision control interface, rests on a dark circuit board. This symbolizes the core intelligence layer of a Prime RFQ, enabling low-latency, high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives via optimized RFQ protocols, refining market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/precision-rfq-protocol-engine-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

The 2002 ISDA's Close-Out Amount replaces subjective valuation with an objective, flexible, and commercially reasonable standard.

- 
### [Can a Determining Party Rely Solely on Internal Models for Valuation under the 2002 ISDA Master Agreement?](https://options.greeks.live/question/can-a-determining-party-rely-solely-on-internal-models-for-valuation-under-the-2002-isda-master-agreement/)
![A precise teal instrument, symbolizing high-fidelity execution and price discovery, intersects angular market microstructure elements. These structured planes represent a Principal's operational framework for digital asset derivatives, resting upon a reflective liquidity pool for aggregated inquiry via RFQ protocols.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-platform-underpinning-rfq-protocol-liquidity-aggregation-and-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

A Determining Party may use internal models for valuation, but sole reliance is conditional upon the unavailability or unreasonableness of external market data.

- 
### [How Does the Rationality Standard of the 1992 ISDA Differ from the 2002 Standard?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-rationality-standard-of-the-1992-isda-differ-from-the-2002-standard/)
![A transparent, multi-faceted component, indicative of an RFQ engine's intricate market microstructure logic, emerges from complex FIX Protocol connectivity. Its sharp edges signify high-fidelity execution and price discovery precision for institutional digital asset derivatives. This Prime RFQ module optimizes algorithmic trading and capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimized-for-best-execution.jpg)

The 2002 ISDA standard mandates an objective, commercially reasonable process and result, replacing the 1992's subjective rationality test.

- 
### [How Does the Close-Out Amount Calculation Differ from the 1992 Loss Method?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-close-out-amount-calculation-differ-from-the-1992-loss-method/)
![A precise mechanical instrument with intersecting transparent and opaque hands, representing the intricate market microstructure of institutional digital asset derivatives. This visual metaphor highlights dynamic price discovery and bid-ask spread dynamics within RFQ protocols, emphasizing high-fidelity execution and latent liquidity through a robust Prime RFQ for atomic settlement.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineering-driving-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-across-advanced-rfq-protocols-and-prime-brokerage-frameworks.jpg)

The Close-out Amount mandates an objective, market-verifiable process, while the 1992 Loss method permits a subjective, internal one.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "How Does the Close-Out Amount Calculation Differ from the 1992 Loss and Market Quotation Methods?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-close-out-amount-calculation-differ-from-the-1992-loss-and-market-quotation-methods/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-close-out-amount-calculation-differ-from-the-1992-loss-and-market-quotation-methods/"
    },
    "headline": "How Does the Close-Out Amount Calculation Differ from the 1992 Loss and Market Quotation Methods? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "The Close-Out Amount is a flexible, evidence-based valuation, while Loss is a subjective indemnity and Market Quotation is a rigid, quote-driven process. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-close-out-amount-calculation-differ-from-the-1992-loss-and-market-quotation-methods/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-05T13:53:28+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-10-26T03:18:21+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/principals-private-quotation-system-intelligence-layer-component.jpg",
        "caption": "A sleek, spherical device with visible internal blue gears and a precision optical lens, symbolizing a critical component of an institutional-grade Crypto Derivatives OS. This intelligence layer facilitates high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives, leveraging RFQ protocols for private quotation and robust price discovery. It optimizes market microstructure for block trades and multi-leg spreads, minimizing latency and slippage, ensuring best execution and capital efficiency."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "1992 ISDA",
        "2002 ISDA",
        "2002 ISDA Master Agreement",
        "Close-Out Amount",
        "Commercially Reasonable",
        "Counterparty Risk",
        "Default Management",
        "Derivatives Close-Out",
        "Determining Party",
        "Early Termination Amount",
        "Good Faith",
        "ISDA Master Agreement",
        "Loss Calculation",
        "Market Data",
        "Market Quotation",
        "Master Agreement",
        "Non-Defaulting Party",
        "Settlement Amount",
        "Swaps and Derivatives"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "FAQPage",
    "mainEntity": [
        {
            "@type": "Question",
            "name": "What Are The Strategic Failures Of Market Quotation?",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "@type": "Answer",
                "text": "The Market Quotation methodology, despite its intention to provide objective valuation, contained inherent strategic flaws that became apparent during market crises. Its reliance on external dealer quotes created significant vulnerabilities:"
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Question",
            "name": "How Is The Close-Out Amount Execution Engine Superior?",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "@type": "Answer",
                "text": "The execution of the 2002 ISDA's Close-Out Amount is a more sophisticated process that synthesizes elements of both prior methods into a single, robust engine. The core executive principle is the creation of a \"commercially reasonable\" valuation through a defensible and transparent process. This requires the determining party to act as a rational market participant seeking to mitigate its losses in an efficient manner."
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Question",
            "name": "How Does This Affect Your Counterparty Risk Framework?",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "@type": "Answer",
                "text": "Consider the inputs your own valuation systems rely upon. Are they diverse enough to produce a commercially reasonable result in a crisis? Is your documentation process disciplined enough to create an unassailable audit trail? The strength of the Close-Out Amount lies in its flexibility, but that flexibility places a significant burden of proof on the calculating party. A robust internal framework is the ultimate source of a decisive operational edge in the event of a counterparty default."
            }
        }
    ]
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-close-out-amount-calculation-differ-from-the-1992-loss-and-market-quotation-methods/
