# How Does the FCA Calculate Fines for MiFID II Reporting Breaches? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-15
**Categories:** Question

---

![A sophisticated proprietary system module featuring precision-engineered components, symbolizing an institutional-grade Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives. Its intricate design represents market microstructure analysis, RFQ protocol integration, and high-fidelity execution capabilities, optimizing liquidity aggregation and price discovery for block trades within a multi-leg spread environment](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-proprietary-architecture-driving-high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-via-rfq-protocols-and-optimized-market-microstructure-dynamics.jpg)

![An exposed institutional digital asset derivatives engine reveals its market microstructure. The polished disc represents a liquidity pool for price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system.jpg)

## Concept

![A cutaway reveals the intricate market microstructure of an institutional-grade platform. Internal components signify algorithmic trading logic, supporting high-fidelity execution via a streamlined RFQ protocol for aggregated inquiry and price discovery within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-execution-for-digital-asset-derivatives-via-rfq-protocols.jpg)

## The Calculus of Compliance

The regulatory framework governing financial markets operates on a principle of systemic integrity. Within this intricate system, the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) [transaction reporting](https://prime.greeks.live/area/transaction-reporting/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) requirements function as a critical data conduit, providing the [Financial Conduct Authority](https://prime.greeks.live/area/financial-conduct-authority/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (FCA) with the high-resolution market intelligence necessary for effective oversight. A failure in this reporting is a systemic disruption. It introduces opacity where transparency is required, creating blind spots that can obscure market abuse, inhibit effective supervision, and ultimately undermine the stability of the financial system.

The FCA’s approach to penalizing such breaches is a direct reflection of the severity of this disruption. It is a meticulously calibrated process designed to quantify the systemic harm and establish a credible deterrent against future failures.

Understanding the FCA’s [penalty calculation](https://prime.greeks.live/question/can-a-firms-investment-in-regtech-be-considered-a-mitigating-factor-in-a-mifid-ii-penalty-calculation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) mechanism requires viewing it as an engineering problem. The objective is to design a system that not only rectifies the immediate financial advantage gained from a breach but also accounts for the broader, often intangible, damage to market confidence and orderliness. The fine is the output of a multi-stage algorithm, a process where specific inputs ▴ such as the nature of the breach, the revenue generated, and the firm’s conduct ▴ are systematically processed through a series of defined steps.

This methodical approach ensures that penalties are proportionate, consistent, and, most importantly, effective in reinforcing the behavioral standards required to maintain a fair and orderly market. The entire structure is predicated on the idea that a penalty must be significant enough to command the attention of a firm’s senior management and compel a fundamental reassessment of its compliance architecture.

> The FCA’s penalty framework is a systematic process designed to quantify the harm of reporting breaches and deter future misconduct.

The foundation of this process is the FCA’s Decision Procedure and Penalties manual (DEPP), specifically section 6.5A, which codifies the five-step calculation for imposing financial penalties on firms. This is the operational blueprint. It moves the assessment from a purely discretionary judgment to a structured evaluation. Each step serves a distinct purpose, from neutralizing the economic benefit of non-compliance to adjusting for the firm’s behavior both before and after the discovery of the breach.

For firms, comprehending this five-step process is fundamental to grasping their own regulatory risk. It transforms the abstract threat of a fine into a tangible, quantifiable liability, allowing for a more precise calibration of investments in compliance systems, controls, and personnel. The calculation is a clear signal from the regulator ▴ [reporting failures](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-systemic-failures-that-lead-to-inaccurate-partial-fill-reporting/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) are systemic failures, and they will be addressed with a systemic and financially significant response.

![Abstract forms depict interconnected institutional liquidity pools and intricate market microstructure. Sharp algorithmic execution paths traverse smooth aggregated inquiry surfaces, symbolizing high-fidelity execution within a Principal's operational framework](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-prime-os-1.jpg)

![An intricate, transparent digital asset derivatives engine visualizes market microstructure and liquidity pool dynamics. Its precise components signify high-fidelity execution via FIX Protocol, facilitating RFQ protocols for block trade and multi-leg spread strategies within an institutional-grade Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-liquidity-ecosystem.jpg)

## Strategy

![A reflective, metallic platter with a central spindle and an integrated circuit board edge against a dark backdrop. This imagery evokes the core low-latency infrastructure for institutional digital asset derivatives, illustrating high-fidelity execution and market microstructure dynamics](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-infrastructure-precision.jpg)

## The Five Steps of Regulatory Consequence

The FCA’s strategic framework for calculating financial penalties is a sequential, five-step process that ensures a consistent and proportionate application of its enforcement powers. This methodology serves as the core logic for translating a regulatory breach into a specific monetary sum. Each step is a distinct analytical stage, building upon the previous one to arrive at a final figure that reflects the full context of the misconduct. For any firm facing an enforcement action for [MiFID II reporting](https://prime.greeks.live/area/mifid-ii-reporting/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) failures, understanding the mechanics and strategic intent of each step is paramount.

![A precise lens-like module, symbolizing high-fidelity execution and market microstructure insight, rests on a sharp blade, representing optimal smart order routing. Curved surfaces depict distinct liquidity pools within an institutional-grade Prime RFQ, enabling efficient RFQ for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-via-rfq-protocols.jpg)

## Step 1 Disgorgement of Illicit Gains

The process begins with the principle of [disgorgement](https://prime.greeks.live/area/disgorgement/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). The FCA’s primary objective at this stage is to neutralize any direct financial benefit the firm has derived from the breach. This may include profits earned or losses avoided as a direct result of the reporting failure. For instance, if a firm avoided costs associated with implementing and maintaining a compliant reporting system, the FCA might seek to quantify and reclaim that avoided expenditure.

The strategic purpose is to ensure that non-compliance is never a profitable activity. This step removes the foundational economic incentive for the breach, clearing the way for the subsequent steps which focus on the punitive and deterrent aspects of the penalty.

![Two sharp, intersecting blades, one white, one blue, represent precise RFQ protocols and high-fidelity execution within complex market microstructure. Behind them, translucent wavy forms signify dynamic liquidity pools, multi-leg spreads, and volatility surfaces](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-optimized-liquidity-aggregation-principal-prime-os-intelligence-layer.jpg)

## Step 2 Quantifying the Seriousness of the Breach

This is the most complex and significant stage of the calculation. Here, the FCA determines a baseline figure that reflects the gravity of the misconduct. For MiFID II reporting breaches, this figure is typically based on the firm’s “relevant revenue.” This is defined as the revenue generated from the business areas or products connected to the breach during the period of non-compliance. The FCA then applies a percentage to this revenue figure, based on a five-level scale of seriousness:

- **Level 1** 0%

- **Level 2** 5%

- **Level 3** 10%

- **Level 4** 15%

- **Level 5** 20%

The selection of the appropriate level is a critical judgment based on a range of factors. The FCA assesses the impact of the breach, such as the risk of loss to investors or the damage to market confidence. It considers the nature of the breach itself, including whether it revealed systemic weaknesses in the firm’s controls.

Finally, the regulator evaluates the firm’s culpability, specifically whether the breach was deliberate or reckless. A systemic, multi-year failure in transaction reporting that concealed potential [market abuse](https://prime.greeks.live/area/market-abuse/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) would almost certainly be assessed at Level 4 or 5, reflecting its profound impact on market integrity.

> The core of the penalty is calculated as a percentage of the revenue linked to the breach, reflecting the seriousness of the systemic failure.

![A slender metallic probe extends between two curved surfaces. This abstractly illustrates high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives, driving price discovery within market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-instrument-navigating-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-for-optimal-price-discovery-and-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Step 3 Adjustment for Aggravating and Mitigating Factors

Once the baseline seriousness figure is established at Step 2, it can be adjusted upwards or downwards based on the firm’s conduct. This step introduces a behavioral component into the calculation. The FCA examines factors that either aggravate or mitigate the breach. Aggravating factors, which would increase the penalty, include failing to notify the FCA promptly upon discovery, a poor compliance history, or failing to act on previous warnings.

Conversely, mitigating factors can reduce the penalty. These include prompt self-reporting, a high degree of cooperation with the investigation, and taking swift and effective remedial action, such as compensating affected parties and overhauling the deficient systems. This stage incentivizes transparency and cooperation, providing a clear path for firms to actively reduce their ultimate financial liability through responsible conduct.

![A sleek, dark teal surface contrasts with reflective black and an angular silver mechanism featuring a blue glow and button. This represents an institutional-grade RFQ platform for digital asset derivatives, embodying high-fidelity execution in market microstructure for block trades, optimizing capital efficiency via Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-platform-interface-optimizing-rfq-protocols-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## Step 4 the Deterrence Uplift

The fourth step serves as a final calibration to ensure the penalty achieves its broader strategic objective ▴ credible deterrence. The FCA assesses whether the penalty figure, after adjustments in Step 3, is sufficient to deter not only the firm in question but also the wider industry from committing similar breaches. If the figure is deemed too low to send a powerful message ▴ perhaps because the firm is very large or because previous fines for similar conduct have not improved industry standards ▴ the FCA can apply a “deterrence uplift.” This is a discretionary increase to ensure the final penalty is impactful and serves as a clear warning that resonates across the market. The significant fines issued for MiFID II reporting failures demonstrate the FCA’s willingness to use this uplift to underscore the importance of compliance.

![A central reflective sphere, representing a Principal's algorithmic trading core, rests within a luminous liquidity pool, intersected by a precise execution bar. This visualizes price discovery for digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols, reflecting market microstructure optimization within an institutional grade Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-rfq-engine-for-digital-asset-derivatives-best-execution.jpg)

## Step 5 the Settlement Discount

The final step in the process is the application of a settlement discount. The FCA offers a reduction in the penalty if the firm agrees to settle the case at an early stage. This discount recognizes the resource savings for the regulator and provides a final incentive for the firm to resolve the matter efficiently. The discount is tiered, with the largest reduction (typically 30%) available for firms that agree to settle during the initial “Stage 1” investigation period.

The discount decreases as the case progresses through the enforcement process. It is important to note that this discount is applied to the punitive element of the fine (the figure derived from Steps 2, 3, and 4), not to the disgorgement amount calculated in Step 1.

![Sleek teal and beige forms converge, embodying institutional digital asset derivatives platforms. A central RFQ protocol hub with metallic blades signifies high-fidelity execution and price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-microstructure.jpg)

![Abstract composition featuring transparent liquidity pools and a structured Prime RFQ platform. Crossing elements symbolize algorithmic trading and multi-leg spread execution, visualizing high-fidelity execution within market microstructure for institutional digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-system-precision-engineering-facilitating-high-fidelity-execution-via-rfq-protocols-and-optimal-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## Execution

![Interlocking transparent and opaque geometric planes on a dark surface. This abstract form visually articulates the intricate Market Microstructure of Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives, embodying High-Fidelity Execution through advanced RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/geometric-abstraction-of-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-market-microstructure-driving-high-fidelity-execution-via-principal-rfq-protocols-and-optimal-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## The Operational Mechanics of Penalty Calculation

The execution of the FCA’s five-step penalty calculation is a data-intensive and highly procedural process. It moves from the strategic framework outlined in the DEPP manual to a granular, evidence-based assessment of a firm’s specific MiFID II reporting failures. For the institution under investigation, navigating this process requires a profound understanding of the specific data points and qualitative factors the FCA will scrutinize at each stage. This is the operational playbook for how a multi-million-pound fine is constructed.

![A transparent, multi-faceted component, indicative of an RFQ engine's intricate market microstructure logic, emerges from complex FIX Protocol connectivity. Its sharp edges signify high-fidelity execution and price discovery precision for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimized-for-best-execution.jpg)

## Executing Step 2 a Deep Dive into Seriousness

The calculation of the “seriousness” figure at Step 2 is the quantitative core of the entire penalty. The first operational task for the FCA is to define the “relevant revenue.” For a MiFID II transaction reporting breach, this would typically be the revenue generated from the execution and transmission of orders in the financial instruments that were misreported or not reported. This requires the firm to provide, and the FCA to validate, detailed financial data linking revenue streams to specific business lines and instrument classes over the entire period of the breach.

Once the relevant revenue is established, the FCA’s focus shifts to selecting the appropriate seriousness level (1 to 5). This is not a subjective choice; it is based on an evaluation of specific factors. The table below provides a granular view of how different types of reporting failures might be categorized, leading to a specific percentage multiplier.

| Seriousness Level | Percentage of Relevant Revenue | Qualitative Characteristics of the MiFID II Breach |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Level 1 | 0% | An isolated, minor technical reporting error with no market impact, immediately identified, self-reported, and corrected. In practice, this level is rarely used for formal penalties and is more likely to be handled via supervisory action. |
| Level 2 | 5% | Negligent errors in a limited number of transaction reports, such as incorrect timestamps or LEIs, over a short period. The errors did not conceal suspicious activity and had a low risk of impacting market oversight. |
| Level 3 | 10% | Systemic but unintentional reporting failures in one asset class over a moderate period (e.g. 1-2 years). The failures resulted from inadequate systems or controls but were not deliberate. The breach impaired the FCA’s market view but did not actively mislead. |
| Level 4 | 15% | Widespread, multi-year reporting failures across several business lines, indicating serious or systemic weaknesses in management systems and internal controls. The breach was reckless, meaning the firm was aware of a risk of non-compliance and failed to mitigate it. The volume of incorrect data significantly hampered market surveillance. |
| Level 5 | 20% | A deliberate failure to report transactions, or the intentional submission of false or misleading data, potentially to conceal market abuse or other misconduct. Senior management was aware of the breach, and it had a significant adverse effect on market confidence and the FCA’s ability to perform its duties. |

![A dark blue sphere, representing a deep institutional liquidity pool, integrates a central RFQ engine. This system processes aggregated inquiries for Digital Asset Derivatives, including Bitcoin Options and Ethereum Futures, enabling high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-for-optimized-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## Executing Step 3 the Impact of Firm Conduct

The adjustment at Step 3 is where a firm’s actions post-breach have the most direct financial consequence. The FCA applies a percentage-based modification to the Step 2 figure. This adjustment is a powerful lever to incentivize responsible behavior. The following table contrasts aggravating and mitigating actions and their potential impact on the penalty calculation.

| Factor | Aggravating Actions (Penalty Increase) | Mitigating Actions (Penalty Decrease) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Discovery and Reporting | Attempting to conceal the breach; failing to notify the FCA for a prolonged period after discovery; being notified of the breach by the FCA or a third party. | Proactively identifying the breach through internal controls; self-reporting to the FCA promptly and comprehensively. |
| Cooperation | Providing incomplete or misleading information during the investigation; delaying responses to FCA requests; failing to provide access to relevant personnel or systems. | Showing a high degree of cooperation; conducting a thorough internal investigation and sharing the findings; responding to requests in a timely and transparent manner. |
| Remediation | Taking no or inadequate steps to fix the root cause of the reporting failure; failing to compensate any parties harmed by the breach; a “quick fix” that does not address systemic issues. | Implementing a comprehensive remediation plan; investing in new systems and controls; compensating affected clients or the market where appropriate; taking disciplinary action against responsible individuals. |
| Compliance History | A history of prior warnings or enforcement actions related to reporting or systems and controls; a culture of non-compliance. | A clean disciplinary record; a demonstrable commitment to a strong compliance culture; evidence of significant investment in compliance prior to the breach. |

> A firm’s cooperation and remediation efforts can directly reduce the financial penalty, making post-breach conduct a critical phase.

![Two smooth, teal spheres, representing institutional liquidity pools, precisely balance a metallic object, symbolizing a block trade executed via RFQ protocol. This depicts high-fidelity execution, optimizing price discovery and capital efficiency within a Principal's operational framework for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-execution-bridging-institutional-liquidity-pools-via-rfq-protocol-for-optimized-digital-asset-derivatives-price-discovery.jpg)

## The Procedural Flow of an Enforcement Action

The calculation of the fine is embedded within a formal enforcement process. Understanding this operational sequence is vital for any firm under investigation.

- **Discovery and Scoping** The process begins when the breach is discovered, either by the firm or the FCA. The FCA’s enforcement division will open a formal investigation and issue a “scoping notice” to the firm, outlining the areas of concern and requesting initial information.

- **Investigation and Information Gathering** This is an intensive period where the FCA will request extensive documentation, including transaction data, internal audits, board minutes, and communications. They will also conduct interviews with key personnel, from reporting officers to senior management.

- **Preliminary Findings** The FCA will issue a Preliminary Investigation Report (PIR) to the firm, setting out its initial findings of fact and the alleged breaches. The firm has an opportunity to respond to the PIR, correcting any factual inaccuracies.

- **Penalty Negotiations (Stage 1)** Following the PIR, settlement discussions typically begin. The FCA will present its preliminary view on the penalty calculation, including the proposed disgorgement and Step 2 figure. This is the firm’s opportunity to present its arguments on mitigating factors and to agree to a settlement to secure the maximum 30% discount.

- **Warning Notice** If a settlement is not reached, the FCA will issue a formal Warning Notice, which sets out the full details of the case, the evidence, and the proposed penalty. The case is then passed to the FCA’s Regulatory Decisions Committee (RDC), an independent body.

- **Decision Notice** The firm can make representations to the RDC. The RDC will then decide whether to issue a Decision Notice, which confirms the finding of a breach and the financial penalty. This notice can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber).

- **Final Notice** If no appeal is made, or if an appeal is unsuccessful, the FCA issues a Final Notice, making the findings and the penalty public.

This procedural journey underscores the importance of early and full cooperation. The most significant opportunity to influence the outcome of the penalty calculation occurs during the investigation and early settlement stages. By understanding the mechanics of the five-step calculation and the procedural context in which it is applied, a firm can navigate an FCA enforcement action with a clear view of the financial stakes and the strategic levers available to it.

![A sophisticated dark-hued institutional-grade digital asset derivatives platform interface, featuring a glowing aperture symbolizing active RFQ price discovery and high-fidelity execution. The integrated intelligence layer facilitates atomic settlement and multi-leg spread processing, optimizing market microstructure for prime brokerage operations and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-crypto-derivatives-rfq-engine-intelligence-layer.jpg)

## References

- Financial Conduct Authority. “DEPP 6.5A ▴ The five steps for penalties imposed on firms.” Decision Procedure and Penalties Manual, FCA Handbook, 2013.

- Financial Conduct Authority. “DEPP 6.5C ▴ The five steps for penalties imposed on individuals in market abuse cases.” Decision Procedure and Penalties Manual, FCA Handbook, 2017.

- NICE Actimize. “FCA’s MiFID and MAR Fines Begin, Buy-Side Takes Note.” NICE Actimize Blog, 21 May 2019.

- European Securities and Markets Authority. “Guidelines on transaction reporting, order record keeping and clock synchronisation.” ESMA/2016/1452, 10 October 2016.

- Harris, Larry. Trading and Exchanges ▴ Market Microstructure for Practitioners. Oxford University Press, 2003.

- O’Hara, Maureen. Market Microstructure Theory. Blackwell Publishers, 1995.

![Abstract geometric forms in muted beige, grey, and teal represent the intricate market microstructure of institutional digital asset derivatives. Sharp angles and depth symbolize high-fidelity execution and price discovery within RFQ protocols, highlighting capital efficiency and real-time risk management for multi-leg spreads on a Prime RFQ platform](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-optimized-rfq-execution-for-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

## Reflection

![Two abstract, segmented forms intersect, representing dynamic RFQ protocol interactions and price discovery mechanisms. The layered structures symbolize liquidity aggregation across multi-leg spreads within complex market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-microstructure.jpg)

## Beyond the Penalty a Systemic Recalibration

The FCA’s five-step penalty calculation is a precise and powerful regulatory instrument. Its true significance extends beyond the final monetary figure printed on a Final Notice. The framework compels a firm to look inward, to dissect the chain of events and systemic failures that led to the reporting breach.

It forces a confrontation with inadequacies in technological architecture, weaknesses in human oversight, and flaws in corporate governance. The process is, in effect, a mandatory diagnostic for the health of a firm’s compliance function.

Viewing the penalty calculation purely as a financial liability is a strategic misstep. A more advanced perspective frames it as a critical data point on the firm’s operational resilience. A significant fine is an unambiguous signal that a core component of the firm’s market-facing infrastructure has failed.

The ultimate value of this painful process lies not in the payment of the fine, but in the subsequent recalibration of the systems, controls, and culture that allowed the failure to occur. The real question the framework poses to a firm’s leadership is how this intelligence will be integrated to build a more robust and resilient operational system for the future.

![A curved grey surface anchors a translucent blue disk, pierced by a sharp green financial instrument and two silver stylus elements. This visualizes a precise RFQ protocol for institutional digital asset derivatives, enabling liquidity aggregation, high-fidelity execution, price discovery, and algorithmic trading within market microstructure via a Principal's operational framework](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-high-fidelity-execution-via-rfq-protocols-optimizing-market-microstructure-and-price-discovery.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/financial-conduct-authority/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A dark, textured module with a glossy top and silver button, featuring active RFQ protocol status indicators. This represents a Principal's operational framework for high-fidelity execution of institutional digital asset derivatives, optimizing atomic settlement and capital efficiency within market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-interface-1.jpg)

## Financial Conduct Authority

Meaning ▴ The Financial Conduct Authority operates as the conduct regulator for financial services firms and financial markets in the United Kingdom. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/transaction-reporting/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precision-engineered system component, featuring a reflective disc and spherical intelligence layer, represents institutional-grade digital asset derivatives. It embodies high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols for optimal price discovery within Prime RFQ market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-intelligence-prime-os.jpg)

## Transaction Reporting

Meaning ▴ Transaction Reporting defines the formal process of submitting granular trade data, encompassing execution specifics and counterparty information, to designated regulatory authorities or internal oversight frameworks. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/can-a-firms-investment-in-regtech-be-considered-a-mitigating-factor-in-a-mifid-ii-penalty-calculation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![An abstract, multi-component digital infrastructure with a central lens and circuit patterns, embodying an Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives platform. This Prime RFQ enables High-Fidelity Execution via RFQ Protocol, optimizing Market Microstructure for Algorithmic Trading, Price Discovery, and Multi-Leg Spread](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-grade-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-platform-powering-high-fidelity-execution-via-advanced-rfq-protocol-prime-os-intelligence-layer.jpg)

## Penalty Calculation

A documented RegTech investment serves as tangible proof of robust internal controls, directly countering claims of systemic weakness in penalty assessments. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-systemic-failures-that-lead-to-inaccurate-partial-fill-reporting/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Intersecting digital architecture with glowing conduits symbolizes Principal's operational framework. An RFQ engine ensures high-fidelity execution of Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives, facilitating block trades, multi-leg spreads](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Reporting Failures

Inaccurate partial fill reporting is a data integrity failure caused by architectural weaknesses in the EMS-to-OMS communication and reconciliation process. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/mifid-ii-reporting/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A gleaming, translucent sphere with intricate internal mechanisms, flanked by precision metallic probes, symbolizes a sophisticated Principal's RFQ engine. This represents the atomic settlement of multi-leg spread strategies, enabling high-fidelity execution and robust price discovery within institutional digital asset derivatives markets, minimizing latency and slippage for optimal alpha generation and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/inst-digital-asset-deriv-rfq-os-for-optimal-high-fidelity-trade-exec.jpg)

## Mifid Ii Reporting

Meaning ▴ MiFID II Reporting defines the mandatory regulatory obligation for investment firms operating within the European Union to systematically capture and transmit granular data concerning transactions in financial instruments and order book events to National Competent Authorities or Approved Reporting Mechanisms. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/disgorgement/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![An abstract digital interface features a dark circular screen with two luminous dots, one teal and one grey, symbolizing active and pending private quotation statuses within an RFQ protocol. Below, sharp parallel lines in black, beige, and grey delineate distinct liquidity pools and execution pathways for multi-leg spread strategies, reflecting market microstructure and high-fidelity execution for institutional grade digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-displaying-multi-leg-execution-status-and-optimal-liquidity-pathways.jpg)

## Disgorgement

Meaning ▴ Disgorgement represents the compelled repayment of ill-gotten gains derived from unlawful or unethical conduct within financial markets. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/market-abuse/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precise teal instrument, symbolizing high-fidelity execution and price discovery, intersects angular market microstructure elements. These structured planes represent a Principal's operational framework for digital asset derivatives, resting upon a reflective liquidity pool for aggregated inquiry via RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-platform-underpinning-rfq-protocol-liquidity-aggregation-and-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Market Abuse

Meaning ▴ Market abuse denotes a spectrum of behaviors that distort the fair and orderly operation of financial markets, compromising the integrity of price formation and the equitable access to information for all participants. </a>

**Tags:** [Market Abuse](https://options.greeks.live/area/market-abuse/), [MiFID II Reporting](https://options.greeks.live/area/mifid-ii-reporting/), [Regulatory Penalties](https://options.greeks.live/area/regulatory-penalties/), [Transaction Reporting](https://options.greeks.live/area/transaction-reporting/), [DEPP 6.5a](https://options.greeks.live/area/depp-6-5a/), [Systems and Controls](https://options.greeks.live/area/systems-and-controls/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [What Are the Legal and Compliance Implications of Persistent Counterparty Information Leakage?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-legal-and-compliance-implications-of-persistent-counterparty-information-leakage/)
![Abstract forms depict institutional digital asset derivatives RFQ. Spheres symbolize block trades, centrally engaged by a metallic disc representing the Prime RFQ. This facilitates high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement, optimizing market microstructure for aggregated inquiry and capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-system-prime-os.jpg)

Counterparty information leakage is a critical vulnerability with significant legal and compliance implications.

- 
### [What Is the Role of an Approved Reporting Mechanism ARM in the MiFIR Transaction Reporting Protocol?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-role-of-an-approved-reporting-mechanism-arm-in-the-mifir-transaction-reporting-protocol/)
![An abstract metallic cross-shaped mechanism, symbolizing a Principal's execution engine for institutional digital asset derivatives. Its teal arm highlights specialized RFQ protocols, enabling high-fidelity price discovery across diverse liquidity pools for optimal capital efficiency and atomic settlement via Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocol-for-digital-asset-derivatives-trading.jpg)

An ARM is a specialized intermediary that validates and submits transaction reports to regulators, enhancing data quality and reducing firm risk.

- 
### [What Are the Primary Differences between MiFID II and EMIR Reporting for Derivatives?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-differences-between-mifid-ii-and-emir-reporting-for-derivatives/)
![A central toroidal structure and intricate core are bisected by two blades: one algorithmic with circuits, the other solid. This symbolizes an institutional digital asset derivatives platform, leveraging RFQ protocols for high-fidelity execution and price discovery. It optimizes market microstructure for capital efficiency, managing multi-leg spreads and latent liquidity within a Principal's operational framework.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-hub-integrating-algorithmic-intelligence-for-high-fidelity-price-discovery-and-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

MiFID II and EMIR are distinct regulatory systems one for market surveillance, the other for systemic risk mitigation in derivatives.

- 
### [How Can a Firm Quantitatively Measure the Effectiveness of Its Compliance Reporting Controls?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-a-firm-quantitatively-measure-the-effectiveness-of-its-compliance-reporting-controls/)
![Abstract depiction of an institutional digital asset derivatives execution system. A central market microstructure wheel supports a Prime RFQ framework, revealing an algorithmic trading engine for high-fidelity execution of multi-leg spreads and block trades via advanced RFQ protocols, optimizing capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-rfq-execution-system-1.jpg)

A firm measures compliance control effectiveness by engineering a data-driven system that quantifies risk in real-time.

- 
### [What Are the Key Differences between an ARM and a Trade Repository?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-between-an-arm-and-a-trade-repository/)
![A sleek, futuristic object with a glowing line and intricate metallic core, symbolizing a Prime RFQ for institutional digital asset derivatives. It represents a sophisticated RFQ protocol engine enabling high-fidelity execution, liquidity aggregation, atomic settlement, and capital efficiency for multi-leg spreads.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/advanced-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine-for-optimal-liquidity-aggregation-and-atomic-settlement.jpg)

An ARM is a conduit for MiFID II transaction reporting, while a Trade Repository is a central library for EMIR derivatives data.

- 
### [What Role Do Approved Reporting Mechanisms Play in Streamlining Block Trade Reporting Workflows?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-role-do-approved-reporting-mechanisms-play-in-streamlining-block-trade-reporting-workflows/)
![A crystalline droplet, representing a block trade or liquidity pool, rests precisely on an advanced Crypto Derivatives OS platform. Its internal shimmering particles signify aggregated order flow and implied volatility data, demonstrating high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency within market microstructure, facilitating private quotation via RFQ protocols.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-rfq-protocol-best-execution.jpg)

Approved reporting mechanisms codify large transactions, ensuring market integrity and operational transparency for institutional participants.

- 
### [What Are the Penalties for Non-Compliance with MiFID II Data Storage and Security Requirements?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-penalties-for-non-compliance-with-mifid-ii-data-storage-and-security-requirements/)
![Geometric panels, light and dark, interlocked by a luminous diagonal, depict an institutional RFQ protocol for digital asset derivatives. Central nodes symbolize liquidity aggregation and price discovery within a Principal's execution management system, enabling high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement in market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine-1.jpg)

MiFID II non-compliance penalties are severe, systemic, and designed to enforce absolute data transparency and integrity.

- 
### [Which Technological Standards Drive Efficient Block Trade Data Submission Protocols?](https://options.greeks.live/question/which-technological-standards-drive-efficient-block-trade-data-submission-protocols/)
![A modular component, resembling an RFQ gateway, with multiple connection points, intersects a high-fidelity execution pathway. This pathway extends towards a deep, optimized liquidity pool, illustrating robust market microstructure for institutional digital asset derivatives trading and atomic settlement.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/rfq-protocol-layer-connecting-institutional-digital-asset-liquidity-pools.jpg)

Technological standards like FIX Protocol, FIXML, and the Common Domain Model drive precise and compliant block trade data submission.

- 
### [What Are the Key Differences between CFTC and ESMA Block Trade Reporting Requirements?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-between-cftc-and-esma-block-trade-reporting-requirements/)
![An abstract composition featuring two overlapping digital asset liquidity pools, intersected by angular structures representing multi-leg RFQ protocols. This visualizes dynamic price discovery, high-fidelity execution, and aggregated liquidity within institutional-grade crypto derivatives OS, optimizing capital efficiency and mitigating counterparty risk.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-optimizing-aggregated-liquidity-and-multi-leg-execution-via-advanced-market-microstructure.jpg)

Mastering block trade reporting necessitates distinct operational frameworks for CFTC and ESMA, optimizing discretion and market impact.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "How Does the FCA Calculate Fines for MiFID II Reporting Breaches?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-fca-calculate-fines-for-mifid-ii-reporting-breaches/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-fca-calculate-fines-for-mifid-ii-reporting-breaches/"
    },
    "headline": "How Does the FCA Calculate Fines for MiFID II Reporting Breaches? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "The FCA calculates MiFID II fines via a five-step process quantifying breach seriousness and adjusting for conduct and deterrence. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-fca-calculate-fines-for-mifid-ii-reporting-breaches/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-15T01:10:43+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-08-15T01:10:46+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-market-microstructure-optimizing-rfq-protocols-for-high-fidelity-execution-via-prime-os.jpg",
        "caption": "Abstract visualization of an institutional-grade Crypto Derivatives OS, engineered for optimal market microstructure and capital efficiency. Robust metallic framework signifies FIX Protocol connectivity, enabling high-fidelity execution and smart order routing. Prominent discs represent dynamic liquidity pools, dark pools, and implied volatility surfaces, facilitating private quotation and aggregated inquiry via RFQ protocols for multi-leg spread and block trade execution, ensuring precise price discovery for digital asset derivatives."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Compliance Breaches",
        "DEPP 6.5a",
        "Deterrence Uplift",
        "Disgorgement",
        "FCA Fines",
        "Financial Conduct Authority",
        "Market Abuse",
        "MiFID II Reporting",
        "Regulatory Penalties",
        "Relevant Revenue",
        "Settlement Discount",
        "Systems and Controls",
        "Transaction Reporting"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-fca-calculate-fines-for-mifid-ii-reporting-breaches/
