# How Does the Implied Duty of Fairness Constrain an Rfp Issuer's Evaluation Process? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-08
**Categories:** Question

---

![Interlocking transparent and opaque geometric planes on a dark surface. This abstract form visually articulates the intricate Market Microstructure of Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives, embodying High-Fidelity Execution through advanced RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/geometric-abstraction-of-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-market-microstructure-driving-high-fidelity-execution-via-principal-rfq-protocols-and-optimal-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

![A dynamic visual representation of an institutional trading system, featuring a central liquidity aggregation engine emitting a controlled order flow through dedicated market infrastructure. This illustrates high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives, optimizing price discovery within a private quotation environment for block trades, ensuring capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-os-driving-high-fidelity-execution-for-digital-asset-derivatives-through-optimized-rfq-protocols-and-smart-order-routing.jpg)

## Concept

The [implied duty of fairness](https://prime.greeks.live/area/implied-duty-of-fairness/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is an architectural principle governing the Request for Proposal (RFP) process, transforming it from a simple invitation to negotiate into a structured, binding commitment to procedural integrity. Its primary function is to constrain the issuer’s discretion, ensuring the evaluation and award process is transparent, objective, and equitable for all participants. This legal doctrine, most notably articulated in Canadian law, establishes that an issuer’s solicitation for bids creates a preliminary contract ▴ often termed “[Contract A](https://prime.greeks.live/area/contract-a/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)” ▴ with every compliant bidder. This initial contract governs the conduct of the procurement process itself, entirely separate from the ultimate “Contract B,” which is the final agreement awarded to the successful proponent.

The genesis of this framework is the understanding that bidders invest significant resources in preparing a proposal based on the rules of engagement set forth by the issuer. The duty of fairness protects this investment by preventing the issuer from arbitrarily changing those rules mid-process. It mandates that the issuer treat all bidders equally, evaluating proposals strictly against the pre-disclosed criteria and methodologies. Any deviation from this path, such as applying hidden preferences or accepting a [non-compliant bid](https://prime.greeks.live/area/non-compliant-bid/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), constitutes a breach of Contract A, exposing the issuer to legal action for damages, often equivalent to the lost profits of the wronged bidder.

> The submission of a compliant bid in response to an RFP establishes a binding process contract, “Contract A,” which legally obligates the issuer to a duty of fairness and equal treatment.

![A symmetrical, multi-faceted structure depicts an institutional Digital Asset Derivatives execution system. Its central crystalline core represents high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-microstructure.jpg)

## The Contract a and Contract B Framework

The foundational concept of the dual-contract structure originated from the landmark Canadian Supreme Court case, R. v. [Ron Engineering](https://prime.greeks.live/area/ron-engineering/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) & Construction (Eastern) Ltd. This ruling established that the act of submitting a tender in response to a call for bids creates “Contract A”.

This is a unilateral contract that binds the bidder to its submitted terms (e.g. price irrevocability for a set period) and simultaneously binds the issuer to the procedural rules outlined in the RFP documents. These rules are not merely guidelines; they are enforceable contractual obligations.

The core tenets of Contract A include several implied duties that constrain the issuer’s [evaluation process](https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite):

- **Duty to Disclose** ▴ The issuer must clearly and comprehensively state all significant [evaluation criteria](https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-criteria/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) and their relative importance within the RFP document. This includes technical requirements, financial considerations, vendor experience, and any other factors that will influence the selection.

- **Duty to Adhere to Disclosed Criteria** ▴ The [evaluation committee](https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-committee/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) must assess proposals solely based on the criteria published in the RFP. Introducing undeclared factors or preferences during the evaluation is a direct breach of fairness.

- **Duty to Reject Non-Compliant Bids** ▴ An issuer is obligated to disqualify any proposal that fails to meet the [mandatory requirements](https://prime.greeks.live/area/mandatory-requirements/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) set out in the RFP. Accepting a materially non-compliant bid is unfair to all other bidders who dedicated resources to meeting every stipulation.

- **Duty of Equal Treatment** ▴ All proponents must be treated uniformly, without favoritism or prejudice. This extends to how clarifications are handled, how information is shared, and how scoring is applied.

Only after the evaluation is completed according to the rules of Contract A is the final performance contract, “[Contract B](https://prime.greeks.live/area/contract-b/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite),” awarded to the winning proponent. This two-contract system provides a legal mechanism to enforce [procedural fairness](https://prime.greeks.live/area/procedural-fairness/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) throughout the entire procurement lifecycle, ensuring the integrity of the competitive bidding system.

![Curved, segmented surfaces in blue, beige, and teal, with a transparent cylindrical element against a dark background. This abstractly depicts volatility surfaces and market microstructure, facilitating high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols for digital asset derivatives, enabling price discovery and revealing latent liquidity for institutional trading](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/optimized-rfq-protocol-dynamics-for-institutional-crypto-derivatives.jpg)

![A transparent sphere, bisected by dark rods, symbolizes an RFQ protocol's core. This represents multi-leg spread execution within a high-fidelity market microstructure for institutional grade digital asset derivatives, ensuring optimal price discovery and capital efficiency via Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Strategy

Integrating the duty of fairness into procurement strategy moves the concept from a legal constraint to a mechanism for achieving superior outcomes and mitigating risk. A strategically designed RFP process, built on a foundation of fairness, enhances the quality and competitiveness of proposals, fosters positive vendor relationships, and creates a defensible and transparent award decision. The core strategic objective is to structure the evaluation process in a way that channels discretion through objective frameworks, thereby preventing arbitrary or biased decision-making.

![A central mechanism of an Institutional Grade Crypto Derivatives OS with dynamically rotating arms. These translucent blue panels symbolize High-Fidelity Execution via an RFQ Protocol, facilitating Price Discovery and Liquidity Aggregation for Digital Asset Derivatives within complex Market Microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-engine-for-digital-asset-derivatives-best-execution.jpg)

## Designing a Defensible Evaluation Architecture

The cornerstone of a fair evaluation process is the architecture of the evaluation criteria themselves. These criteria must be developed before the RFP is issued and must be explicitly and clearly detailed in the solicitation document. A strategic approach to criteria design involves ensuring that all factors are directly relevant to the project’s objectives and are measurable in a consistent manner.

Key strategic elements include:

- **Weighting and Prioritization** ▴ Assigning specific weights or points to each evaluation category (e.g. technical solution, price, experience) before the RFP is released. This communicates the issuer’s priorities to bidders and provides a clear, mathematical basis for the final ranking, reducing the potential for subjective influence.

- **Pass/Fail Criteria for Mandatory Requirements** ▴ Utilizing pass/fail gates for non-negotiable requirements, such as essential certifications, legal compliance, or minimum levels of insurance. This approach efficiently filters out non-compliant bids at the outset, ensuring that only eligible proponents proceed to the detailed evaluation stage.

- **Scoring Rubrics** ▴ Developing detailed scoring rubrics that define what constitutes an excellent, good, fair, or poor response for each weighted criterion. For example, a “5-point” score for project management experience might require the bidder to demonstrate experience with at least three projects of similar scale and complexity, including named references. This provides evaluators with a clear, consistent standard for assigning scores.

![A sleek device showcases a rotating translucent teal disc, symbolizing dynamic price discovery and volatility surface visualization within an RFQ protocol. Its numerical display suggests a quantitative pricing engine facilitating algorithmic execution for digital asset derivatives, optimizing market microstructure through an intelligence layer](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-for-digital-asset-rfq-execution-system-with-smart-liquidity-routing.jpg)

## Comparative Analysis of Evaluation Criteria Approaches

The structure of evaluation criteria has a direct impact on the fairness and defensibility of the procurement outcome. Issuers must strategically choose an approach that aligns with the complexity of the procurement and the need for objective assessment.

| Criteria Approach | Description | Strategic Advantage | Associated Risk |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Basic Scoring | Each criterion is assigned a score (e.g. 1-10), with all criteria having equal importance. | Simple to implement and understand for straightforward procurements. | May not accurately reflect project priorities, as minor criteria are weighted the same as critical ones. |
| Weighted Scoring | Each criterion is assigned a weight (e.g. Price 30%, Technical 50%, Experience 20%) reflecting its relative importance. Scores are multiplied by the weight to get a final score. | Ensures the final ranking aligns with the issuer’s strategic priorities. Provides a clear, defensible rationale for the award decision. | Requires careful upfront analysis to set appropriate weights. Can be complex to calculate without a structured system. |
| Combination Scoring | A hybrid approach where different criteria have different maximum point scales (e.g. Technical out of 50, Price out of 30). Often used with pass/fail mandatory requirements. | Offers high flexibility to tailor the evaluation to the specific needs of a complex project. | Can become overly complex if not clearly explained in the RFP, potentially confusing bidders and evaluators. |

![Teal capsule represents a private quotation for multi-leg spreads within a Prime RFQ, enabling high-fidelity institutional digital asset derivatives execution. Dark spheres symbolize aggregated inquiry from liquidity pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-prime-os-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Managing Evaluator Conduct and Discretion

Individual evaluators are a primary source of potential bias. A robust strategy for ensuring fairness must include protocols for managing the evaluation committee. This involves providing clear instructions, training on unconscious bias, and establishing rules for communication and documentation. The goal is to ensure that all evaluators are applying the same standards and that their judgments are grounded in the evidence presented in the proposals.

Effective strategies include:

- **Conflict of Interest Declarations** ▴ Requiring all members of the evaluation committee to certify in writing that they have no personal or financial conflict of interest with any of the bidding parties.

- **Independent Initial Scoring** ▴ Mandating that evaluators score the proposals independently before any group discussion. This prevents a single, dominant voice from unduly influencing the entire committee.

- **Consensus Meetings** ▴ Facilitating moderated consensus meetings where evaluators can discuss their scoring. Any significant discrepancies in scores should be examined and justified based on the evidence in the proposals and the definitions in the scoring rubric. All score changes must be documented with a clear rationale.

![Abstract layered forms visualize market microstructure, featuring overlapping circles as liquidity pools and order book dynamics. A prominent diagonal band signifies RFQ protocol pathways, enabling high-fidelity execution and price discovery for institutional digital asset derivatives, hinting at dark liquidity and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol.jpg)

![A futuristic apparatus visualizes high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives. A transparent sphere represents a private quotation or block trade, balanced on a teal Principal's operational framework, signifying capital efficiency within an RFQ protocol](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-via-prime-os.jpg)

## Execution

The execution of a fair evaluation process requires a disciplined, systematic application of the principles established in the concept and strategy phases. It is a procedural undertaking where meticulous documentation and adherence to the pre-defined framework are paramount. A failure at the execution level, even if unintentional, can undermine the entire procurement and expose the organization to significant legal and reputational risk.

![A central, intricate blue mechanism, evocative of an Execution Management System EMS or Prime RFQ, embodies algorithmic trading. Transparent rings signify dynamic liquidity pools and price discovery for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-framework-driving-high-fidelity-rfq-execution-and-optimized-market-microstructure-for-capital-efficiency.jpg)

## The Procedural Blueprint for Fair Evaluation

A successful and defensible evaluation process follows a clear, sequential path. Each step must be executed with precision and documented in the procurement file. This blueprint ensures consistency and transparency from bid receipt to contract award.

- **Bid Receipt and Control** ▴ Establish a secure, single point of receipt for all proposals. The time and date of submission for each bid must be logged. Late submissions are to be rejected without being opened, as accepting them would be a clear breach of the duty of fairness to proponents who complied with the deadline.

- **Initial Compliance Review** ▴ The procurement officer, not the evaluation committee, should first conduct a preliminary review to screen for compliance with mandatory requirements. This is a check against a pre-defined list (e.g. submission format, required forms, bonding requirements, pass/fail criteria). Proposals that are materially non-compliant are documented and set aside.

- **Distribution to Evaluators** ▴ Compliant proposals are distributed to the pre-selected and vetted members of the evaluation committee. Each member should receive an identical package of materials, including the proposals, the scoring rubrics, and instructions for evaluation.

- **Independent Scoring Phase** ▴ Each evaluator must review and score every proposal independently, using the provided scoring sheets and rubrics. Evaluators should be instructed to make notes justifying their scores, referencing specific sections of each proposal.

- **Consensus and Moderation** ▴ The evaluation committee convenes for a moderated consensus meeting. The moderator (typically the procurement officer) facilitates a discussion of the scores for each criterion for each proposal. The goal is to resolve significant scoring variances and arrive at a single, consensus score for each proposal. All changes from individual to consensus scores must be documented with a clear rationale.

- **Final Ranking and Recommendation** ▴ Once all consensus scores are finalized, the final weighted scores are calculated according to the formula specified in the RFP. The proposals are ranked, and the evaluation committee prepares a formal recommendation for the award, which is submitted to the designated approval authority.

- **Debriefing Unsuccessful Proponents** ▴ After the contract is awarded, the issuer should offer to provide debriefings to all unsuccessful proponents. These debriefings should be structured and consistent, providing feedback based on the evaluation criteria and explaining the relative strengths and weaknesses of their proposal against the winning bid, without revealing confidential information.

> A rigorously documented evaluation, from initial compliance checks to final scoring consensus, forms the bedrock of a legally defensible procurement decision.

![A precisely engineered system features layered grey and beige plates, representing distinct liquidity pools or market segments, connected by a central dark blue RFQ protocol hub. Transparent teal bars, symbolizing multi-leg options spreads or algorithmic trading pathways, intersect through this core, facilitating price discovery and high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives via an institutional-grade Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-facilitating-high-fidelity-multi-leg-options-spread-execution-best-price-discovery-and-latent-liquidity-access-for-prime-brokerage.jpg)

## Quantitative Scoring in Practice

A quantitative scoring model is the most effective tool for executing a fair and objective evaluation. It translates qualitative assessments into numerical data that can be aggregated and compared, minimizing subjectivity. The following table illustrates a hypothetical evaluation for a complex IT services RFP, demonstrating how [weighted criteria](https://prime.greeks.live/area/weighted-criteria/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) are applied to produce a defensible outcome.

| Evaluation Criterion | Weight | Bidder A Score (1-10) | Bidder A Weighted Score | Bidder B Score (1-10) | Bidder B Weighted Score | Bidder C Score (1-10) | Bidder C Weighted Score |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Technical Solution & Approach | 40% | 9 | 3.6 | 7 | 2.8 | 8 | 3.2 |
| Project Team Experience & Qualifications | 25% | 8 | 2.0 | 9 | 2.25 | 7 | 1.75 |
| Implementation Plan & Timeline | 15% | 7 | 1.05 | 8 | 1.2 | 9 | 1.35 |
| Price (Scored Inversely) | 20% | 6 | 1.2 | 9 | 1.8 | 7 | 1.4 |
| Total Score | 100% | | 7.85 | | 8.05 | | 7.70 |

In this model, Bidder B emerges as the winner despite not having the highest-rated technical solution. Its superior scores in the highly weighted categories of experience and price propelled it to the top ranking. This data-driven result is highly defensible because it is a direct product of the pre-disclosed evaluation framework, demonstrating a clear and unbiased application of the duty of fairness.

![Two intersecting metallic structures form a precise 'X', symbolizing RFQ protocols and algorithmic execution in institutional digital asset derivatives. This represents market microstructure optimization, enabling high-fidelity execution of block trades with atomic settlement for capital efficiency via a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-market-microstructure-execution.jpg)

## References

- Emanuelli, Paul. _The Art of Tendering ▴ A Global Due Diligence Guide._ Emanuelli Public Procurement, 2017.

- Estey, Willard Z. R. v. Ron Engineering and Construction (Eastern) Ltd. 1 S.C.R. 111, Supreme Court of Canada.

- Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP. “Government Contracts, Procurement and Tender Law in Canada.” Fasken, 2022.

- Marston, D. “The Supreme Court of Canada’s Treatment of Tendering Law ▴ The Legacy of Ron Engineering.” Dalhousie Law Journal, vol. 38, no. 1, 2015, pp. 125-154.

- Ricchetti, J. A. and T. J. H. O’Neill. The Law of Tenders in Canada. LexisNexis Canada, 2019.

- Swan, John. Canadian Contract Law. 4th ed. LexisNexis Canada, 2018.

- Watson, Garry D. and Craig M. Forcese. The Law of Contracts and Procurement. Emond Montgomery Publications, 2015.

- Office of the Procurement Ombudsman. “Negotiated Requests for Proposal.” Government of Canada, 2018.

![Robust polygonal structures depict foundational institutional liquidity pools and market microstructure. Transparent, intersecting planes symbolize high-fidelity execution pathways for multi-leg spread strategies and atomic settlement, facilitating private quotation via RFQ protocols within a controlled dark pool environment, ensuring optimal price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-prime-os.jpg)

## Reflection

![Sharp, transparent, teal structures and a golden line intersect a dark void. This symbolizes market microstructure for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-precision-execution-leveraging-granular-market-microstructure-intelligence.jpg)

## Fairness as a Systemic Asset

Viewing the duty of fairness as a mere procedural hurdle misses its strategic value. It is a foundational component of an advanced procurement operating system. By architecting a process that is fair by design, an organization does more than ensure legal compliance; it cultivates a competitive ecosystem where the best proponents are motivated to participate. This systemic integrity sends a clear signal to the market that the issuer is a sophisticated and reliable partner, one that values substance over subjectivity.

The constraints imposed by fairness are, in effect, the very mechanisms that guarantee a more robust, valuable, and defensible outcome. The ultimate advantage lies not in retaining unfettered discretion, but in building a system so transparent and logical that it consistently identifies and secures the optimal solution.

![Abstract architectural representation of a Prime RFQ for institutional digital asset derivatives, illustrating RFQ aggregation and high-fidelity execution. Intersecting beams signify multi-leg spread pathways and liquidity pools, while spheres represent atomic settlement points and implied volatility](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/architecting-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-systems-for-optimized-rfq-execution-and-advanced-price-discovery.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/implied-duty-of-fairness/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, institutional-grade device featuring a reflective blue dome, representing a Crypto Derivatives OS Intelligence Layer for RFQ and Price Discovery. Its metallic arm, symbolizing Pre-Trade Analytics and Latency monitoring, ensures High-Fidelity Execution for Multi-Leg Spreads](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-intelligence-layer.jpg)

## Implied Duty of Fairness

Meaning ▴ The Implied Duty of Fairness represents a foundational, unstated obligation within institutional financial engagements, particularly in digital asset derivatives, mandating equitable and consistent treatment across all participants. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/contract-a/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A multi-segmented sphere symbolizes institutional digital asset derivatives. One quadrant shows a dynamic implied volatility surface](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-liquidity-management.jpg)

## Contract A

Meaning ▴ Contract A defines a standardized, digitally-native forward agreement for a specific digital asset. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/non-compliant-bid/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A dark, transparent capsule, representing a principal's secure channel, is intersected by a sharp teal prism and an opaque beige plane. This illustrates institutional digital asset derivatives interacting with dynamic market microstructure and aggregated liquidity](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-market-microstructure.jpg)

## Non-Compliant Bid

Meaning ▴ A Non-Compliant Bid refers to an order instruction submitted to an electronic trading system that fails to satisfy one or more pre-defined validation rules or systemic parameters. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/ron-engineering/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![An institutional-grade platform's RFQ protocol interface, with a price discovery engine and precision guides, enables high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives. Integrated controls optimize market microstructure and liquidity aggregation within a Principal's operational framework](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/proprietary-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-facilitating-high-fidelity-execution-and-granular-market-microstructure-analysis-for-prime-os.jpg)

## Ron Engineering

Meaning ▴ Ron Engineering designates a proprietary algorithmic framework for dynamic optimization of execution and risk parameters within institutional digital asset derivatives. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Precision-engineered modular components, with transparent elements and metallic conduits, depict a robust RFQ Protocol engine. This architecture facilitates high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives, enabling efficient liquidity aggregation and atomic settlement within market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-optimizing-high-fidelity-execution-and-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## Evaluation Process

Meaning ▴ The Evaluation Process constitutes a systematic, data-driven methodology for assessing performance, risk exposure, and operational compliance within a financial system, particularly concerning institutional digital asset derivatives. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-criteria/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Sleek Prime RFQ interface for institutional digital asset derivatives. An elongated panel displays dynamic numeric readouts, symbolizing multi-leg spread execution and real-time market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-rfq-options.jpg)

## Evaluation Criteria

Meaning ▴ Evaluation Criteria define the quantifiable metrics and qualitative standards against which the performance, compliance, or risk profile of a system, strategy, or transaction is rigorously assessed. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-committee/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A modular institutional trading interface displays a precision trackball and granular controls on a teal execution module. Parallel surfaces symbolize layered market microstructure within a Principal's operational framework, enabling high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-controls.jpg)

## Evaluation Committee

Meaning ▴ An Evaluation Committee constitutes a formally constituted internal governance body responsible for the systematic assessment of proposals, solutions, or counterparties, ensuring alignment with an institution's strategic objectives and operational parameters within the digital asset ecosystem. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/mandatory-requirements/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A crystalline sphere, representing aggregated price discovery and implied volatility, rests precisely on a secure execution rail. This symbolizes a Principal's high-fidelity execution within a sophisticated digital asset derivatives framework, connecting a prime brokerage gateway to a robust liquidity pipeline, ensuring atomic settlement and minimal slippage for institutional block trades](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-platform-optimizing-liquidity-and-risk-management-through-advanced-protocols.jpg)

## Mandatory Requirements

Meaning ▴ Mandatory Requirements represent the non-negotiable specifications or conditions that are fundamentally essential for ensuring system functionality, upholding regulatory compliance, and maintaining operational integrity within institutional digital asset trading environments. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/procedural-fairness/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Precision metallic mechanism with a central translucent sphere, embodying institutional RFQ protocols for digital asset derivatives. This core represents high-fidelity execution within a Prime RFQ, optimizing price discovery and liquidity aggregation for block trades, ensuring capital efficiency and atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-prime-os-execution-hub.jpg)

## Procedural Fairness

Meaning ▴ Procedural Fairness, within a digital asset derivatives ecosystem, denotes the consistent and impartial application of predefined rules and processes to all market participants, ensuring that no entity receives preferential treatment or suffers arbitrary disadvantage. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/contract-b/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A central glowing blue mechanism with a precision reticle is encased by dark metallic panels. This symbolizes an institutional-grade Principal's operational framework for high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-core-enabling-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution.jpg)

## Contract B

Meaning ▴ Contract B, formally designated as a Dynamic Basis Swap, represents a configurable, principal-to-principal digital asset derivative instrument designed to optimize capital efficiency and manage complex yield or hedging requirements across disparate market structures. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/weighted-criteria/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract composition features two intersecting, sharp-edged planes—one dark, one light—representing distinct liquidity pools or multi-leg spreads. Translucent spherical elements, symbolizing digital asset derivatives and price discovery, balance on this intersection, reflecting complex market microstructure and optimal RFQ protocol execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-market-microstructure.jpg)

## Weighted Criteria

Meaning ▴ Weighted Criteria represents a structured analytical framework where distinct factors influencing a decision or evaluation are assigned specific numerical coefficients, reflecting their relative importance or impact. </a>

**Tags:** [Non-Compliant Bid](https://options.greeks.live/area/non-compliant-bid/), [Procurement Law](https://options.greeks.live/area/procurement-law/), [Bid Evaluation Criteria](https://options.greeks.live/area/bid-evaluation-criteria/), [Ron Engineering](https://options.greeks.live/area/ron-engineering/), [Contract B](https://options.greeks.live/area/contract-b/), [Implied Duty of Fairness](https://options.greeks.live/area/implied-duty-of-fairness/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [How Can You Ensure Objectivity When Different Stakeholders Are Scoring an Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-you-ensure-objectivity-when-different-stakeholders-are-scoring-an-rfp/)
![A precise stack of multi-layered circular components visually representing a sophisticated Principal Digital Asset RFQ framework. Each distinct layer signifies a critical component within market microstructure for high-fidelity execution of institutional digital asset derivatives, embodying liquidity aggregation across dark pools, enabling private quotation and atomic settlement.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-digital-asset-rfq-protocol-layers-for-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

A robust decision architecture, built on a weighted scoring protocol and stakeholder alignment, ensures RFP evaluation integrity.

- 
### [In What Ways Can a Flawed Evaluation Process Invalidate an Otherwise Compliant Rfp Procedure?](https://options.greeks.live/question/in-what-ways-can-a-flawed-evaluation-process-invalidate-an-otherwise-compliant-rfp-procedure/)
![Abstract geometric forms in blue and beige represent institutional liquidity pools and market segments. A metallic rod signifies RFQ protocol connectivity for atomic settlement of digital asset derivatives. This visualizes high-fidelity execution and price discovery across diverse trading venues, emphasizing capital efficiency and minimizing slippage.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-market-microstructure-1.jpg)

A flawed evaluation invalidates a compliant RFP by substituting procedural fairness with arbitrary judgment, corrupting the award's legitimacy.

- 
### [How Does the Duty of Fairness Apply to a Public Sector Procurement Process?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-duty-of-fairness-apply-to-a-public-sector-procurement-process/)
![A crystalline sphere, representing aggregated price discovery and implied volatility, rests precisely on a secure execution rail. This symbolizes a Principal's high-fidelity execution within a sophisticated digital asset derivatives framework, connecting a prime brokerage gateway to a robust liquidity pipeline, ensuring atomic settlement and minimal slippage for institutional block trades.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-platform-optimizing-liquidity-and-risk-management-through-advanced-protocols.jpg)

The duty of fairness in public procurement is a legally implied contract binding authorities to a transparent, equitable process for all bidders.

- 
### [What Are the Best Practices for Defining the Scoring Scale in an Rfp Scorecard?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-best-practices-for-defining-the-scoring-scale-in-an-rfp-scorecard/)
![Abstract forms illustrate a Prime RFQ platform's intricate market microstructure. Transparent layers depict deep liquidity pools and RFQ protocols. Sharp elements symbolize high-fidelity execution and multi-leg spread pricing for institutional digital asset derivatives, ensuring atomic settlement and precise price discovery.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-rfq-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-primeos.jpg)

A robust RFP scoring scale translates strategic priorities into a quantitative, defensible decision-making framework.

- 
### [In What Ways Does a Formal RFP Scoring Matrix Improve Transparency and Fairness for Competing Vendors?](https://options.greeks.live/question/in-what-ways-does-a-formal-rfp-scoring-matrix-improve-transparency-and-fairness-for-competing-vendors/)
![A deconstructed mechanical system with segmented components, revealing intricate gears and polished shafts, symbolizing the transparent, modular architecture of an institutional digital asset derivatives trading platform. This illustrates multi-leg spread execution, RFQ protocols, and atomic settlement processes.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/deconstructed-principal-trading-system-revealing-core-mechanics-of-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

A formal RFP scoring matrix improves transparency and fairness by translating subjective needs into an objective, weighted, and auditable data model.

- 
### [What Are the Most Critical Criteria to Include in an Rfp Scoring Model?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-critical-criteria-to-include-in-an-rfp-scoring-model/)
![Precisely aligned forms depict an institutional trading system's RFQ protocol interface. Circular elements symbolize market data feeds and price discovery for digital asset derivatives. A sharp component represents high-fidelity execution and liquidity provision, embodying Prime RFQ efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-interface-optimization.jpg)

An RFP scoring model is a decision-making system that quantifies strategic priorities to objectively select the highest-value vendor.

- 
### [How Does the Duty of Good Faith Limit the Power of a Privilege Clause in an Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-duty-of-good-faith-limit-the-power-of-a-privilege-clause-in-an-rfp/)
![A sophisticated, multi-layered trading interface, embodying an Execution Management System EMS, showcases institutional-grade digital asset derivatives execution. Its sleek design implies high-fidelity execution and low-latency processing for RFQ protocols, enabling price discovery and managing multi-leg spreads with capital efficiency across diverse liquidity pools.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-platform-market-microstructure.jpg)

The duty of good faith limits a privilege clause by requiring that the issuer's discretion be exercised fairly and consistently.

- 
### [What Is the Difference between a Project Manager and a Neutral Facilitator during the Rfp Evaluation Phase?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-a-project-manager-and-a-neutral-facilitator-during-the-rfp-evaluation-phase/)
![An arc of interlocking, alternating pale green and dark grey segments, with black dots on light segments. This symbolizes a modular RFQ protocol for institutional digital asset derivatives, representing discrete private quotation phases or aggregated inquiry nodes. It illustrates high-fidelity execution within a Prime RFQ, optimizing capital efficiency across liquidity pools.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/modular-rfq-protocol-segments-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

The Project Manager drives the RFP evaluation process, while the Neutral Facilitator safeguards the integrity of the decision itself.

- 
### [What Is the Appropriate Role of a Procurement Official in Relation to the Rfp Evaluation Committee?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-appropriate-role-of-a-procurement-official-in-relation-to-the-rfp-evaluation-committee/)
![A precise optical sensor within an institutional-grade execution management system, representing a Prime RFQ intelligence layer. This enables high-fidelity execution and price discovery for digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols, ensuring atomic settlement within market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-high-fidelity-institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-system-lens.jpg)

The procurement official's role is to architect, administer, and enforce a fair and defensible evaluation system for the RFP committee.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "How Does the Implied Duty of Fairness Constrain an Rfp Issuer&#8217;s Evaluation Process?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-implied-duty-of-fairness-constrain-an-rfp-issuers-evaluation-process/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-implied-duty-of-fairness-constrain-an-rfp-issuers-evaluation-process/"
    },
    "headline": "How Does the Implied Duty of Fairness Constrain an Rfp Issuer's Evaluation Process? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "The implied duty of fairness constrains an RFP issuer by creating a binding process contract that mandates transparent, objective evaluation based solely on pre-disclosed criteria. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-implied-duty-of-fairness-constrain-an-rfp-issuers-evaluation-process/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-08T15:01:45+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-08-08T15:01:52+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-rfq-options.jpg",
        "caption": "A sophisticated Prime RFQ interface for institutional digital asset derivatives trading, featuring a sleek control panel displaying real-time market microstructure and multi-leg spread execution data. A prominent transparent sphere symbolizes RFQ protocol private quotation, advanced price discovery, and dynamic implied volatility visualization. This high-fidelity execution environment ensures capital efficiency, ultra-low latency, and robust systemic risk management for complex options trading and aggregated inquiry."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Bid Evaluation Criteria",
        "Contract A",
        "Contract B",
        "Evaluation Committee",
        "Evaluation Criteria",
        "Evaluation Process",
        "Government Tendering",
        "Implied Duty of Fairness",
        "Mandatory Requirements",
        "Non-Compliant Bid",
        "Procedural Fairness",
        "Procurement Law",
        "Public Procurement",
        "RFP Evaluation Process",
        "RFP Scoring",
        "Ron Engineering",
        "Weighted Criteria"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-implied-duty-of-fairness-constrain-an-rfp-issuers-evaluation-process/
