# How Does the Shared Responsibility Model in Cloud Computing Affect Rfp Security Requirements? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-08
**Categories:** Question

---

![A sophisticated dark-hued institutional-grade digital asset derivatives platform interface, featuring a glowing aperture symbolizing active RFQ price discovery and high-fidelity execution. The integrated intelligence layer facilitates atomic settlement and multi-leg spread processing, optimizing market microstructure for prime brokerage operations and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-crypto-derivatives-rfq-engine-intelligence-layer.jpg)

![Precision-engineered institutional-grade Prime RFQ component, showcasing a reflective sphere and teal control. This symbolizes RFQ protocol mechanics, emphasizing high-fidelity execution, atomic settlement, and capital efficiency in digital asset derivatives market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-precision-execution-system-design.jpg)

## Concept

The migration to cloud infrastructure fundamentally reconfigures an organization’s approach to security, shifting it from a model of absolute ownership to one of collaborative governance. This paradigm, the [Shared Responsibility Model](https://prime.greeks.live/area/shared-responsibility-model/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), is a framework that delineates security obligations between a [cloud service provider](https://prime.greeks.live/area/cloud-service-provider/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (CSP) and its client. It establishes a clear demarcation, where the CSP assumes responsibility for the security of the cloud ▴ the physical data centers, the networking fabric, the hypervisors ▴ while the client retains responsibility for security in the cloud. This distinction is the foundational principle upon which all secure cloud operations are built.

The client’s domain of control encompasses data, applications, [identity and access management](https://prime.greeks.live/area/identity-and-access-management/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (IAM), and the configuration of cloud services. The model is not a static agreement but a dynamic one, where the distribution of responsibilities fluidly changes depending on the [service model](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-role-of-service-level-agreements-slas-in-the-rfp-evaluation-process-for-a-service-provider/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) selected, whether Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS), Platform as a Service (PaaS), or Software as a Service (SaaS).

Understanding this division of labor is the initial step in architecting a resilient [security posture](https://prime.greeks.live/area/security-posture/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). In an IaaS model, for instance, the client’s responsibilities are extensive, covering the operating system, middleware, and runtime environments, in addition to their data and applications. The CSP provides the raw compute, storage, and networking resources, but the client builds upon that foundation, inheriting a significant security mantle. Conversely, a SaaS model transfers the bulk of the operational burden to the provider.

The client’s primary duties in a SaaS environment revolve around managing user access and safeguarding the data they input into the application. PaaS occupies a middle ground, with the CSP managing the underlying platform, including operating systems and databases, while the client focuses on the security of their deployed applications and data. This tiered structure requires a sophisticated understanding of where a provider’s duties end and the client’s begin. A failure to accurately map these boundaries creates security vulnerabilities, not through malicious action, but through an oversight in the operational framework.

The implications of this model for an organization’s procurement process, specifically the formulation of a Request for Proposal (RFP), are profound. An RFP can no longer be a generic checklist of security controls. It must transform into a precise diagnostic tool, designed to probe the specific implementation of the [shared responsibility](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-shared-responsibility-model-in-the-cloud-affect-a-firms-compliance-burden/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) framework by a potential CSP. The document must articulate the organization’s [security requirements](https://prime.greeks.live/area/security-requirements/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) with an awareness of which party is accountable for each control.

This requires a systems-level view of security, where the RFP functions as the initial blueprint for a joint security architecture. The questions posed within the RFP must be calibrated to the [specific cloud service model](https://prime.greeks.live/question/which-cloud-service-model-iaas-paas-or-saas-is-most-appropriate-for-core-investment-management-applications/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) being procured, demanding evidence of a CSP’s security capabilities for the components they manage. This targeted approach ensures that the [procurement process](https://prime.greeks.live/area/procurement-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is an exercise in risk allocation, clarifying responsibilities before any contract is signed and building a foundation for a secure and compliant cloud environment.

![A central, symmetrical, multi-faceted mechanism with four radiating arms, crafted from polished metallic and translucent blue-green components, represents an institutional-grade RFQ protocol engine. Its intricate design signifies multi-leg spread algorithmic execution for liquidity aggregation, ensuring atomic settlement within crypto derivatives OS market microstructure for prime brokerage clients](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-rfq-engine-for-crypto-derivatives-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

![A robust green device features a central circular control, symbolizing precise RFQ protocol interaction. This enables high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives, optimizing market microstructure, capital efficiency, and complex options trading within a Crypto Derivatives OS](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-interface-for-precise-market-microstructure-execution.jpg)

## Strategy

A strategic approach to [cloud procurement](https://prime.greeks.live/area/cloud-procurement/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) demands that the Shared [Responsibility Model](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-shared-responsibility-model-in-the-cloud-affect-a-firms-compliance-burden/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) be the central organizing principle of the RFP. This involves deconstructing security requirements into a granular matrix, mapping each control to the responsible party ▴ the CSP, the client, or a shared domain. This analytical process moves the RFP from a simple questionnaire to a strategic document that codifies the future operational security posture. The objective is to eliminate ambiguity and establish a verifiable framework for compliance and risk management.

This process begins with an internal audit of the organization’s data and applications to classify assets based on sensitivity and regulatory requirements. This classification directly informs the stringency and specificity of the [security controls](https://prime.greeks.live/area/security-controls/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) that must be included in the RFP.

![The abstract metallic sculpture represents an advanced RFQ protocol for institutional digital asset derivatives. Its intersecting planes symbolize high-fidelity execution and price discovery across complex multi-leg spread strategies](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-microstructure-optimization.jpg)

## A Framework for Delineating Responsibilities

The core of the strategy is the development of a [Responsibility Assignment Matrix](https://prime.greeks.live/area/responsibility-assignment-matrix/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (RACI) tailored to the specific [cloud service model](https://prime.greeks.live/question/which-cloud-service-model-iaas-paas-or-saas-is-most-appropriate-for-core-investment-management-applications/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) under consideration. This matrix becomes the intellectual backbone of the security section of the RFP. For each security domain ▴ such as identity and access management, data protection, infrastructure security, and incident response ▴ the matrix explicitly defines who is Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, and Informed. This exercise forces a level of clarity that is often absent in traditional security questionnaires.

It compels the organization to think systematically about its own role in the [cloud security](https://prime.greeks.live/area/cloud-security/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) ecosystem. For example, while the CSP may be responsible for the physical security of its [data centers](https://prime.greeks.live/area/data-centers/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), the client remains accountable for implementing robust IAM policies to control access to the cloud resources housed within those facilities.

> The Responsibility Assignment Matrix transforms the RFP from a static checklist into a dynamic blueprint for collaborative security governance.

The RFP must then be structured to solicit responses that align with this matrix. Questions should be formulated to compel potential CSPs to describe their security controls and, crucially, to define the boundaries of their responsibilities. Vague attestations of compliance are insufficient. The RFP should demand detailed descriptions of security mechanisms, service level agreements (SLAs) for security-related tasks, and reports from third-party audits like SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001.

These documents provide tangible evidence of a CSP’s security posture and its commitment to the shared responsibility framework. The goal is to gather the necessary data to perform a comprehensive risk assessment of each potential provider, weighing their capabilities against the organization’s specific security needs.

![A disaggregated institutional-grade digital asset derivatives module, off-white and grey, features a precise brass-ringed aperture. It visualizes an RFQ protocol interface, enabling high-fidelity execution, managing counterparty risk, and optimizing price discovery within market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-modular-execution-intelligence-system.jpg)

## Mapping Security Controls across Service Models

The distribution of responsibilities varies significantly across IaaS, PaaS, and SaaS, and the RFP’s security requirements must reflect this variance. A failure to tailor the questions to the service model results in an inaccurate assessment of the provider’s suitability. The following table illustrates how the responsibility for key security domains shifts across the different service models, providing a strategic guide for structuring RFP inquiries.

| Security Domain | IaaS (Infrastructure as a Service) | PaaS (Platform as a Service) | SaaS (Software as a Service) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

This structured approach ensures that the [RFP process](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) generates the high-fidelity data needed to make an informed decision. It moves beyond a superficial evaluation of a CSP’s marketing claims to a deep, evidence-based analysis of their security architecture and operational practices. The resulting contract becomes a clear and enforceable agreement that accurately reflects the shared security responsibilities, providing a solid foundation for a long-term, secure partnership.

![A sleek, pointed object, merging light and dark modular components, embodies advanced market microstructure for digital asset derivatives. Its precise form represents high-fidelity execution, price discovery via RFQ protocols, emphasizing capital efficiency, institutional grade alpha generation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-digital-asset-rfq-execution-system-microstructure.jpg)

![A sleek, light-colored, egg-shaped component precisely connects to a darker, ergonomic base, signifying high-fidelity integration. This modular design embodies an institutional-grade Crypto Derivatives OS, optimizing RFQ protocols for atomic settlement and best execution within a robust Principal's operational framework, enhancing market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-core-principal-system.jpg)

## Execution

The execution phase translates the strategic framework of the Shared Responsibility Model into a concrete set of actions for developing and evaluating RFP responses. This is an operational discipline that requires meticulous attention to detail and a deep understanding of cloud security architecture. The goal is to create an RFP that functions as a precise diagnostic instrument, capable of assessing a CSP’s security posture with a high degree of accuracy.

This process is not merely administrative; it is a critical component of the organization’s risk management strategy. A well-executed RFP process mitigates the risk of security gaps and ensures that the selected cloud provider is a true partner in securing the organization’s digital assets.

![Interlocking transparent and opaque components on a dark base embody a Crypto Derivatives OS facilitating institutional RFQ protocols. This visual metaphor highlights atomic settlement, capital efficiency, and high-fidelity execution within a prime brokerage ecosystem, optimizing market microstructure for block trade liquidity](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/modular-framework-for-crypto-derivatives-os-rfq-protocol-aggregation.jpg)

## The Operational Playbook for Rfp Development

Developing an RFP that effectively incorporates the Shared Responsibility Model requires a systematic, multi-stage process. This playbook outlines the critical steps an organization must take to ensure its cloud procurement process is both rigorous and efficient. Each step builds upon the last, creating a comprehensive and defensible evaluation framework.

- **Internal Systems Analysis and [Data Classification](https://prime.greeks.live/area/data-classification/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)** ▴ Before writing a single RFP question, the organization must look inward. This involves a thorough inventory of the applications and data slated for migration to the cloud. Each asset must be classified according to its sensitivity, business criticality, and any associated regulatory requirements (e.g. GDPR, HIPAA, PCI DSS). This internal classification dictates the necessary level of security controls and informs the entire RFP process.

- **Define the Service Model Requirements** ▴ The organization must clearly define which [cloud service](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-role-of-service-level-agreements-slas-in-the-rfp-evaluation-process-for-a-service-provider/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) model ▴ IaaS, PaaS, or SaaS ▴ it requires. As the distribution of security responsibilities is contingent on this choice, the RFP’s security questions must be tailored accordingly. A generic set of questions applied to all service models will yield ambiguous and ultimately useless responses.

- **Construct a Service-Specific Responsibility Matrix** ▴ Based on the chosen service model, the organization must develop a detailed Responsibility Assignment Matrix (RACI). This matrix will serve as the foundation for the RFP’s security section, mapping specific security tasks and controls to the responsible party. For example, in an IaaS deployment, the matrix would assign responsibility for guest OS patching to the customer, while in a PaaS model, this would be the provider’s duty.

- **Draft Targeted, Evidence-Based Questions** ▴ The RFP questions must be designed to elicit specific, evidence-based answers. Vague inquiries like “Do you have a security program?” should be replaced with precise questions such as, “Provide a copy of your most recent SOC 2 Type II report and describe your process for remediating any exceptions noted.” Questions should be directly linked to the responsibility matrix and require providers to detail their controls for the areas they manage.

- **Specify Service Level Agreements (SLAs) for Security** ▴ The RFP must require potential providers to submit detailed SLAs for security-related functions. These should include metrics for [incident response](https://prime.greeks.live/area/incident-response/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) times, system uptime, and notification windows for security breaches. The absence of clear, enforceable SLAs is a significant red flag.

- **Establish a [Quantitative Scoring Model](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-best-practices-for-building-a-quantitative-counterparty-scoring-model/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)** ▴ To ensure an objective evaluation of RFP responses, a quantitative [scoring model](https://prime.greeks.live/area/scoring-model/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) should be developed. This model assigns weights to different security domains based on the organization’s risk priorities, as determined in the initial data classification phase. Responses are then scored against this model, providing a data-driven basis for comparing providers.

![Intersecting sleek conduits, one with precise water droplets, a reflective sphere, and a dark blade. This symbolizes institutional RFQ protocol for high-fidelity execution, navigating market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-framework-optimizing-latent-liquidity-discovery-and-atomic-settlement-protocols.jpg)

## Quantitative Modeling and Data Analysis

A quantitative approach to evaluating RFP responses removes subjectivity and provides a defensible rationale for provider selection. The core of this approach is a weighted scoring model that reflects the organization’s unique security priorities. The following table provides a simplified example of such a model for an IaaS provider evaluation. The weights are assigned based on the principle that customer-controlled configurations and [data security](https://prime.greeks.live/area/data-security/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) represent the highest areas of risk and require the most stringent controls from the provider’s underlying platform.

| Security Domain | Evaluation Criteria | Weight | Provider A Score (1-5) | Provider B Score (1-5) | Provider A Weighted Score | Provider B Weighted Score |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |

In this scenario, while Provider A has superior physical infrastructure security, Provider B’s stronger offerings in data security and incident response SLAs result in a higher overall weighted score. This type of quantitative analysis provides a clear, data-driven justification for selecting Provider B, moving the decision-making process from one based on gut feeling to one grounded in a rigorous assessment of risk.

> A quantitative scoring model anchors the provider selection process in objective reality, transforming subjective preferences into a defensible business decision.

![Two intertwined, reflective, metallic structures with translucent teal elements at their core, converging on a central nexus against a dark background. This represents a sophisticated RFQ protocol facilitating price discovery within digital asset derivatives markets, denoting high-fidelity execution and institutional-grade systems optimizing capital efficiency via latent liquidity and smart order routing across dark pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-system-architecture.jpg)

## System Integration and Technological Architecture

The RFP process must also probe the technological architecture of the CSP’s services and their integration capabilities. Security in the cloud is a function of how well the provider’s services can be integrated into the client’s existing security ecosystem. The RFP should include a dedicated section on system integration, with questions designed to assess the following areas:

- **API Security and Access** ▴ The RFP must require providers to detail the security of their APIs. This includes authentication and authorization mechanisms, rate limiting capabilities, and logging and monitoring of API calls. A provider with a poorly documented or insecure API represents a significant risk to the organization.

- **Integration with Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)** ▴ The ability to export logs from the cloud environment to the organization’s SIEM is a critical security requirement. The RFP should ask providers to specify the log formats they support, the methods for log export (e.g. API, streaming), and the level of detail available in the logs.

- **Support for Third-Party Security Tools** ▴ An organization’s security strategy often relies on a suite of third-party tools for functions like vulnerability scanning, endpoint protection, and data loss prevention. The RFP must verify that the CSP’s environment is compatible with these tools and that the provider does not impose restrictions that would limit their effectiveness.

- **Identity Federation** ▴ The RFP should require providers to describe their support for identity federation standards like SAML 2.0 or OpenID Connect. This capability allows the organization to use its existing corporate directory for authenticating users to the cloud environment, streamlining [access management](https://prime.greeks.live/area/access-management/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) and improving security.

By thoroughly vetting a provider’s technological architecture and integration capabilities, the organization can ensure that the selected cloud platform will become a seamless and secure extension of its own IT environment. This level of due diligence is essential for realizing the full security potential of the cloud and for building a resilient, long-term security posture.

![Precision-engineered device with central lens, symbolizing Prime RFQ Intelligence Layer for institutional digital asset derivatives. Facilitates RFQ protocol optimization, driving price discovery for Bitcoin options and Ethereum futures](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-institutional-rfq-protocol-engine-for-digital-asset-derivatives-options-trading.jpg)

## References

- CrowdStrike. (2022, November 13). What is the Shared Responsibility Model? 

- Microsoft. (2024, September 29). Shared responsibility in the cloud. Azure Documentation.

- Aqua Security. (2023, July 13). Cloud Shared Responsibility Model ▴ Examples & Best Practices.

- Center for Internet Security. (n.d.). Shared Responsibility for Cloud Security ▴ What You Need to Know.

- Amazon Web Services. (n.d.). Shared Responsibility Model. AWS Documentation.

- National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2020). Cloud Computing Security ▴ An Introduction. NIST Special Publication 800-210.

- Cloud Security Alliance. (2021). Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.

- Oracle. (2023). A Practical Guide to the Shared Responsibility Model. Oracle Cloud Infrastructure White Paper.

![Abstract intersecting blades in varied textures depict institutional digital asset derivatives. These forms symbolize sophisticated RFQ protocol streams enabling multi-leg spread execution across aggregated liquidity](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-driven-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution.jpg)

## Reflection

![A sleek, metallic module with a dark, reflective sphere sits atop a cylindrical base, symbolizing an institutional-grade Crypto Derivatives OS. This system processes aggregated inquiries for RFQ protocols, enabling high-fidelity execution of multi-leg spreads while managing gamma exposure and slippage within dark pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-trading-crypto-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-system.jpg)

## Calibrating the Organizational Security Compass

The adoption of cloud services necessitates a fundamental recalibration of an organization’s internal security compass. The process of dissecting the Shared Responsibility Model and embedding its logic into the procurement framework does more than simply facilitate the purchase of a service. It compels a deep introspection into the organization’s own security capabilities, processes, and risk appetite. The clarity gained from delineating responsibilities on paper must be translated into a living operational reality.

This requires a sustained commitment to developing the internal expertise needed to manage the client-side of the security equation. The most detailed RFP and the most secure CSP cannot compensate for a lack of diligence in configuring services, managing identities, or protecting data.

> The Shared Responsibility Model is ultimately a mandate for organizational maturity and self-awareness in the domain of cybersecurity.

Therefore, the conclusion of the RFP process is the beginning of a new operational chapter. The responsibility matrix developed for the procurement should evolve into a dynamic governance document, regularly reviewed and updated as the organization’s use of the cloud matures. The true measure of success is not the selection of a provider, but the establishment of a durable, collaborative security partnership. This partnership is built on the shared understanding that security is not a static state to be achieved, but a continuous process of adaptation and refinement.

The knowledge gained through this rigorous procurement process becomes a strategic asset, empowering the organization to navigate the evolving threat landscape with confidence and precision. The ultimate advantage lies in transforming a contractual delineation of duties into a seamless, integrated security culture that spans both the organization and its chosen cloud provider.

![A sophisticated mechanism depicting the high-fidelity execution of institutional digital asset derivatives. It visualizes RFQ protocol efficiency, real-time liquidity aggregation, and atomic settlement within a prime brokerage framework, optimizing market microstructure for multi-leg spreads](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-protocol-execution-liquidity-aggregation-system.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/shared-responsibility-model/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A central blue sphere, representing a Liquidity Pool, balances on a white dome, the Prime RFQ. Perpendicular beige and teal arms, embodying RFQ protocols and Multi-Leg Spread strategies, extend to four peripheral blue elements](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-framework.jpg)

## Shared Responsibility Model

Meaning ▴ The Shared Responsibility Model defines the distinct security obligations between a cloud or platform provider and its institutional client within a digital asset derivatives ecosystem. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/cloud-service-provider/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Precision metallic mechanism with a central translucent sphere, embodying institutional RFQ protocols for digital asset derivatives. This core represents high-fidelity execution within a Prime RFQ, optimizing price discovery and liquidity aggregation for block trades, ensuring capital efficiency and atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-prime-os-execution-hub.jpg)

## Cloud Service Provider

Meaning ▴ A Cloud Service Provider (CSP) is a third-party entity that offers on-demand computing services over a network, typically the internet, encompassing servers, storage, databases, networking, software, analytics, and intelligence. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/identity-and-access-management/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract metallic components, resembling an advanced Prime RFQ mechanism, precisely frame a teal sphere, symbolizing a liquidity pool. This depicts the market microstructure supporting RFQ protocols for high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives, ensuring capital efficiency in algorithmic trading](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-architecture-driving-rfq-protocol-execution-and-capital-efficiency-optimization.jpg)

## Identity and Access Management

Meaning ▴ Identity and Access Management (IAM) defines the security framework for authenticating entities, whether human principals or automated systems, and subsequently authorizing their specific interactions with digital resources within a controlled environment. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-role-of-service-level-agreements-slas-in-the-rfp-evaluation-process-for-a-service-provider/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Sleek teal and beige forms converge, embodying institutional digital asset derivatives platforms. A central RFQ protocol hub with metallic blades signifies high-fidelity execution and price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-microstructure.jpg)

## Service Model

The SLA's role in RFP evaluation is to translate vendor promises into a quantifiable framework for assessing operational risk and value. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/security-posture/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Sleek, metallic, modular hardware with visible circuit elements, symbolizing the market microstructure for institutional digital asset derivatives. This low-latency infrastructure supports RFQ protocols, enabling high-fidelity execution for private quotation and block trade settlement, ensuring capital efficiency within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/market-microstructure-engine-for-crypto-derivatives-rfq-protocol.jpg)

## Security Posture

Meaning ▴ Security Posture defines an institution's comprehensive defensive state against cyber threats and operational risks within its digital asset infrastructure. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-shared-responsibility-model-in-the-cloud-affect-a-firms-compliance-burden/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Two semi-transparent, curved elements, one blueish, one greenish, are centrally connected, symbolizing dynamic institutional RFQ protocols. This configuration suggests aggregated liquidity pools and multi-leg spread constructions](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-price-discovery-engine.jpg)

## Shared Responsibility

The shared responsibility model recalibrates a firm's compliance burden toward automated, software-defined controls. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/security-requirements/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A modular institutional trading interface displays a precision trackball and granular controls on a teal execution module. Parallel surfaces symbolize layered market microstructure within a Principal's operational framework, enabling high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-controls.jpg)

## Security Requirements

Meaning ▴ Security Requirements define precise system conditions for protecting information, assets, and operational processes from unauthorized access or modification. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/which-cloud-service-model-iaas-paas-or-saas-is-most-appropriate-for-core-investment-management-applications/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![An intricate, high-precision mechanism symbolizes an Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives RFQ protocol. Its sleek off-white casing protects the core market microstructure, while the teal-edged component signifies high-fidelity execution and optimal price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-market-microstructure-optimization.jpg)

## Specific Cloud Service Model

A hybrid cloud strategy, mapping applications to IaaS, PaaS, or SaaS based on their unique requirements, is optimal for investment firms. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/procurement-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A luminous blue Bitcoin coin rests precisely within a sleek, multi-layered platform. This embodies high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives via an RFQ protocol, highlighting price discovery and atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-precision-3.jpg)

## Procurement Process

Meaning ▴ The Procurement Process defines a formalized methodology for acquiring necessary resources, such as liquidity, derivatives products, or technology infrastructure, within a controlled, auditable framework specifically tailored for institutional digital asset operations. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-shared-responsibility-model-in-the-cloud-affect-a-firms-compliance-burden/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A dynamic composition depicts an institutional-grade RFQ pipeline connecting a vast liquidity pool to a split circular element representing price discovery and implied volatility. This visual metaphor highlights the precision of an execution management system for digital asset derivatives via private quotation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-pipeline-for-precise-price-discovery-and-volatility-surface-analysis.jpg)

## Responsibility Model

The shared responsibility model recalibrates a firm's compliance burden toward automated, software-defined controls. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/cloud-procurement/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Sharp, intersecting elements, two light, two teal, on a reflective disc, centered by a precise mechanism. This visualizes institutional liquidity convergence for multi-leg options strategies in digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-block-trade-execution.jpg)

## Cloud Procurement

Meaning ▴ Cloud Procurement refers to the strategic acquisition and consumption of on-demand, scalable computing resources, storage, networking, and specialized software services delivered over the internet, specifically tailored for the high-performance and low-latency demands of institutional digital asset derivatives operations. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/security-controls/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![The image depicts two intersecting structural beams, symbolizing a robust Prime RFQ framework for institutional digital asset derivatives. These elements represent interconnected liquidity pools and execution pathways, crucial for high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement within market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-cross-market-execution-architecture-for-digital-assets.jpg)

## Security Controls

Meaning ▴ Security Controls are policies, procedures, and technical mechanisms protecting the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of digital asset systems and data. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/responsibility-assignment-matrix/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A reflective sphere, bisected by a sharp metallic ring, encapsulates a dynamic cosmic pattern. This abstract representation symbolizes a Prime RFQ liquidity pool for institutional digital asset derivatives, enabling RFQ protocol price discovery and high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-1.jpg)

## Responsibility Assignment Matrix

Meaning ▴ The Responsibility Assignment Matrix (RAM), commonly a RACI matrix, systematically defines roles and responsibilities across projects or processes. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/which-cloud-service-model-iaas-paas-or-saas-is-most-appropriate-for-core-investment-management-applications/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Precision-engineered institutional-grade Prime RFQ modules connect via intricate hardware, embodying robust RFQ protocols for digital asset derivatives. This underlying market microstructure enables high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement, optimizing capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/precision-engineered-prime-os-modules-enabling-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-for-best-execution.jpg)

## Cloud Service Model

A hybrid cloud strategy, mapping applications to IaaS, PaaS, or SaaS based on their unique requirements, is optimal for investment firms. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/cloud-security/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A polished, cut-open sphere reveals a sharp, luminous green prism, symbolizing high-fidelity execution within a Principal's operational framework. The reflective interior denotes market microstructure insights and latent liquidity in digital asset derivatives, embodying RFQ protocols for alpha generation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-engine-prime-os-alpha-intelligence.jpg)

## Cloud Security

Meaning ▴ Cloud Security represents the comprehensive set of policies, technologies, and controls deployed to protect data, applications, and infrastructure hosted in a cloud computing environment from threats and vulnerabilities. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/data-centers/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sharp metallic element pierces a central teal ring, symbolizing high-fidelity execution via an RFQ protocol gateway for institutional digital asset derivatives. This depicts precise price discovery and smart order routing within market microstructure, optimizing dark liquidity for block trades and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-protocol-optimizing-liquidity-discovery-and-smart-order-routing.jpg)

## Data Centers

Meaning ▴ Data centers serve as the foundational physical infrastructure housing the computational, storage, and networking systems critical for processing and managing institutional digital asset derivatives. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A central precision-engineered RFQ engine orchestrates high-fidelity execution across interconnected market microstructure. This Prime RFQ node facilitates multi-leg spread pricing and liquidity aggregation for institutional digital asset derivatives, minimizing slippage](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/high-fidelity-rfq-execution-for-institutional-crypto-derivatives.jpg)

## Rfp Process

Meaning ▴ The Request for Proposal (RFP) Process defines a formal, structured procurement methodology employed by institutional Principals to solicit detailed proposals from potential vendors for complex technological solutions or specialized services, particularly within the domain of institutional digital asset derivatives infrastructure and trading systems. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/data-classification/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![The abstract visual depicts a sophisticated, transparent execution engine showcasing market microstructure for institutional digital asset derivatives. Its central matching engine facilitates RFQ protocol execution, revealing internal algorithmic trading logic and high-fidelity execution pathways](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-rfq-engine-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

## Data Classification

Meaning ▴ Data Classification defines a systematic process for categorizing digital assets and associated information based on sensitivity, regulatory requirements, and business criticality. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-role-of-service-level-agreements-slas-in-the-rfp-evaluation-process-for-a-service-provider/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Two sleek, abstract forms, one dark, one light, are precisely stacked, symbolizing a multi-layered institutional trading system. This embodies sophisticated RFQ protocols, high-fidelity execution, and optimal liquidity aggregation for digital asset derivatives, ensuring robust market microstructure and capital efficiency within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-digital-asset-derivatives-platform-architecture-high-fidelity-execution-protocols-and-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## Cloud Service

The SLA's role in RFP evaluation is to translate vendor promises into a quantifiable framework for assessing operational risk and value. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/incident-response/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Central reflective hub with radiating metallic rods and layered translucent blades. This visualizes an RFQ protocol engine, symbolizing the Prime RFQ orchestrating multi-dealer liquidity for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-digital-asset-rfq-execution-and-liquidity-management.jpg)

## Incident Response

Meaning ▴ Incident Response defines the structured methodology for an organization to prepare for, detect, contain, eradicate, recover from, and post-analyze cybersecurity breaches or operational disruptions affecting critical systems and digital assets. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-best-practices-for-building-a-quantitative-counterparty-scoring-model/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Clear sphere, precise metallic probe, reflective platform, blue internal light. This symbolizes RFQ protocol for high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives, optimizing price discovery within market microstructure, leveraging dark liquidity for atomic settlement and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-precision-execution-1.jpg)

## Quantitative Scoring Model

A quantitative counterparty scoring model is an architectural system for translating default risk into a decisive, operational metric. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/scoring-model/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Translucent, overlapping geometric shapes symbolize dynamic liquidity aggregation within an institutional grade RFQ protocol. Central elements represent the execution management system's focal point for precise price discovery and atomic settlement of multi-leg spread digital asset derivatives, revealing complex market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-driving-optimal-liquidity-aggregation-for-precise-price-discovery-and-atomic-settlement.jpg)

## Scoring Model

Meaning ▴ A Scoring Model represents a structured quantitative framework designed to assign a numerical value or rank to an entity, such as a digital asset, counterparty, or transaction, based on a predefined set of weighted criteria. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/data-security/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Geometric panels, light and dark, interlocked by a luminous diagonal, depict an institutional RFQ protocol for digital asset derivatives. Central nodes symbolize liquidity aggregation and price discovery within a Principal's execution management system, enabling high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement in market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine-1.jpg)

## Data Security

Meaning ▴ Data Security defines the comprehensive set of measures and protocols implemented to protect digital asset information and transactional data from unauthorized access, corruption, or compromise throughout its lifecycle within an institutional trading environment. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/access-management/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A translucent institutional-grade platform reveals its RFQ execution engine with radiating intelligence layer pathways. Central price discovery mechanisms and liquidity pool access points are flanked by pre-trade analytics modules for digital asset derivatives and multi-leg spreads, ensuring high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-core-platform.jpg)

## Access Management

Meaning ▴ Access Management constitutes the comprehensive framework and set of protocols governing the authorization and authentication of entities ▴ users, applications, or processes ▴ to interact with specific resources, functions, or data within a digital asset trading ecosystem. </a>

**Tags:** [Security Level Agreements](https://options.greeks.live/area/security-level-agreements/), [Data Security](https://options.greeks.live/area/data-security/), [Procurement Process](https://options.greeks.live/area/procurement-process/), [Access Management](https://options.greeks.live/area/access-management/), [PaaS Security](https://options.greeks.live/area/paas-security/), [Responsibility Assignment Matrix](https://options.greeks.live/area/responsibility-assignment-matrix/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [Beyond Technical Controls What Are the Key Cultural and Procedural Changes Needed to Secure an Erp and Rfp Integration?](https://options.greeks.live/question/beyond-technical-controls-what-are-the-key-cultural-and-procedural-changes-needed-to-secure-an-erp-and-rfp-integration/)
![Abstract RFQ engine, transparent blades symbolize multi-leg spread execution and high-fidelity price discovery. The central hub aggregates deep liquidity pools. Red glows indicate real-time market microstructure dynamics and optimal capital efficiency for institutional digital asset derivatives block trades.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-rfq-engine-for-crypto-derivatives-high-fidelity-block-trade.jpg)

Securing ERP-RFP integration requires embedding a security-first culture and resilient procedures into the organizational fabric.

- 
### [What Are the Primary Disadvantages of Using a Single-Stage Rfp Process?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-disadvantages-of-using-a-single-stage-rfp-process/)
![An intricate mechanical assembly reveals the market microstructure of an institutional-grade RFQ protocol engine. It visualizes high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives block trades, managing counterparty risk and multi-leg spread strategies within a liquidity pool, embodying a Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-architecture.jpg)

A single-stage RFP process creates systemic risk by separating design from execution, fostering adversarial relationships, and limiting strategic collaboration.

- 
### [How Can Organizations Accurately Calculate the Baseline Costs of Their Manual Rfp Processes?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-organizations-accurately-calculate-the-baseline-costs-of-their-manual-rfp-processes/)
![A sleek, institutional-grade system processes a dynamic stream of market microstructure data, projecting a high-fidelity execution pathway for digital asset derivatives. This represents a private quotation RFQ protocol, optimizing price discovery and capital efficiency through an intelligence layer.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-rfq-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-microstructure-prime-os.jpg)

Accurately calculating manual RFP costs requires a systemic quantification of all direct, indirect, and opportunity costs to reveal the true operational drag.

- 
### [What Are the Primary Data Breach Risks When Connecting an Rfp Platform to an Erp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-data-breach-risks-when-connecting-an-rfp-platform-to-an-erp/)
![A metallic structural component interlocks with two black, dome-shaped modules, each displaying a green data indicator. This signifies a dynamic RFQ protocol within an institutional Prime RFQ, enabling high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives. Internal mechanisms underscore algorithmic trading and pre-trade analytics for capital efficiency and best execution.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/modular-rfq-protocol-engine-for-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os.jpg)

The primary data breach risk in an RFP-ERP connection is the creation of a unified attack surface where third-party vulnerabilities can grant direct access to core enterprise data.

- 
### [When Is a Traditional Rfp More Appropriate than a Hybrid Model?](https://options.greeks.live/question/when-is-a-traditional-rfp-more-appropriate-than-a-hybrid-model/)
![A sleek, angular Prime RFQ interface component featuring a vibrant teal sphere, symbolizing a precise control point for institutional digital asset derivatives. This represents high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement within advanced RFQ protocols, optimizing price discovery and liquidity across complex market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-control-point.jpg)

A traditional RFP is the optimal system for acquiring known commodities against fixed specifications with maximum control and auditability.

- 
### [How Does the Evaluation Criteria Differ between a Request for Proposal and a Quote?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-evaluation-criteria-differ-between-a-request-for-proposal-and-a-quote/)
![A dark blue, precision-engineered blade-like instrument, representing a digital asset derivative or multi-leg spread, rests on a light foundational block, symbolizing a private quotation or block trade. This structure intersects robust teal market infrastructure rails, indicating RFQ protocol execution within a Prime RFQ for high-fidelity execution and liquidity aggregation in institutional trading.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-framework-multi-leg-spreads-best-execution-capital-efficiency.jpg)

RFP evaluation assesses a proposed solution's value; RFQ evaluation verifies the lowest compliant price for a specification.

- 
### [How Can an Organization Mitigate the Risks Associated with a More Open and Collaborative Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-mitigate-the-risks-associated-with-a-more-open-and-collaborative-rfp/)
![A sleek, dark reflective sphere is precisely intersected by two flat, light-toned blades, creating an intricate cross-sectional design. This visually represents institutional digital asset derivatives' market microstructure, where RFQ protocols enable high-fidelity execution and price discovery within dark liquidity pools, ensuring capital efficiency and managing counterparty risk via advanced Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-market-microstructure.jpg)

A collaborative RFP's risks are mitigated by architecting a system of controlled transparency and objective governance.

- 
### [How Can a RACI Chart Be Implemented to Improve RFP Decision-Making Speed and Clarity?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-a-raci-chart-be-implemented-to-improve-rfp-decision-making-speed-and-clarity/)
![A dark, reflective surface showcases a metallic bar, symbolizing market microstructure and RFQ protocol precision for block trade execution. A clear sphere, representing atomic settlement or implied volatility, rests upon it, set against a teal liquidity pool. This depicts institutional-grade digital asset derivatives trading with high-fidelity execution and prime brokerage oversight.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-execution-4.jpg)

A RACI chart improves RFP decision-making by architecting a clear protocol of roles, ensuring accountability and accelerating information flow.

- 
### [What Are the Primary Advantages of Using an Rfp over an Ifb for a Technology Project?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-advantages-of-using-an-rfp-over-an-ifb-for-a-technology-project/)
![A sleek, multi-layered device, possibly a control knob, with cream, navy, and metallic accents, against a dark background. This represents a Prime RFQ interface for Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives. Its refined design signifies High-Fidelity Execution, Private Quotation capabilities, and Algorithmic Trading precision within Market Microstructure for Best Execution via RFQ protocols, minimizing Slippage.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-control-interface-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-and-prime-os.jpg)

An RFP's primary advantage is its function as a strategic tool for discovering the best value solution to a complex problem.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "How Does the Shared Responsibility Model in Cloud Computing Affect Rfp Security Requirements?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-shared-responsibility-model-in-cloud-computing-affect-rfp-security-requirements/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-shared-responsibility-model-in-cloud-computing-affect-rfp-security-requirements/"
    },
    "headline": "How Does the Shared Responsibility Model in Cloud Computing Affect Rfp Security Requirements? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "The Shared Responsibility Model reframes RFP security as a collaborative architectural design, delineating precise ownership of controls. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-shared-responsibility-model-in-cloud-computing-affect-rfp-security-requirements/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-08T16:59:01+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-08-08T16:59:05+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-interface.jpg",
        "caption": "This abstract composition of reflective and contoured surfaces against a deep void visually embodies the sophisticated market microstructure of institutional digital asset derivatives. It highlights the precise interface of an RFQ protocol, facilitating private quotation and aggregated inquiry for block trades. The design suggests high-fidelity execution via smart order routing, minimizing slippage and latency. This represents a secure dark liquidity environment, crucial for managing counterparty risk and achieving capital efficiency within a Prime RFQ, optimizing algorithmic trading."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Access Management",
        "Cloud Governance",
        "Cloud Procurement",
        "Cloud Security",
        "Cloud Service Provider",
        "Customer Responsibility",
        "Data Centers",
        "Data Classification",
        "Data Security",
        "IaaS Security",
        "Identity and Access Management",
        "Incident Response",
        "PaaS Security",
        "Procurement Process",
        "Quantitative Risk Assessment",
        "Responsibility Assignment Matrix",
        "RFP Process",
        "RFP Security Requirements",
        "SaaS Security",
        "Scoring Model",
        "Security Controls",
        "Security Level Agreements",
        "Security Posture",
        "Security Requirements",
        "Shared Responsibility Model"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-shared-responsibility-model-in-cloud-computing-affect-rfp-security-requirements/
