# How Has the Kumho Tire Decision Affected the Admissibility of Non-Scientific Expert Testimony? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-05
**Categories:** Question

---

![A sleek, spherical white and blue module featuring a central black aperture and teal lens, representing the core Intelligence Layer for Institutional Trading in Digital Asset Derivatives. It visualizes High-Fidelity Execution within an RFQ protocol, enabling precise Price Discovery and optimizing the Principal's Operational Framework for Crypto Derivatives OS](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-lens-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution.jpg)

![A sophisticated mechanical core, split by contrasting illumination, represents an Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives RFQ engine. Its precise concentric mechanisms symbolize High-Fidelity Execution, Market Microstructure optimization, and Algorithmic Trading within a Prime RFQ, enabling optimal Price Discovery and Liquidity Aggregation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-engine-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-precision-execution.jpg)

## Concept

The operational framework for litigating complex commercial and product liability disputes underwent a fundamental architectural revision with the Supreme Court’s decision in _[Kumho Tire](https://prime.greeks.live/area/kumho-tire/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) Co. v. Carmichael_. Before this ruling, the system for admitting [expert testimony](https://prime.greeks.live/area/expert-testimony/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) operated on a bifurcated track. Testimony rooted in the hard sciences was subjected to the rigorous validation protocol established by _Daubert v.

Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc._, which mandated that federal judges act as vigilant “gatekeepers” to ensure such testimony was grounded in reliable scientific methodology. Concurrently, a vast category of “non-scientific” expertise ▴ the insights of engineers, economists, accountants, and other specialists relying on skill or experience ▴ often entered the evidentiary record through a less demanding, more permissive gateway. The core challenge for practitioners was navigating this dual-standard system, where the classification of an expert as “scientific” or “technical” could dictate the strategic trajectory of an entire case.

The _Kumho Tire_ decision collapsed this binary structure into a single, unified system. It established that the judge’s gatekeeping responsibility extends to all expert testimony, regardless of its classification. The Court articulated that the core principle of _Daubert_ ▴ the demand for evidentiary reliability and relevance ▴ applies with equal force to the testimony of an engineer analyzing a mechanical failure as it does to a chemist analyzing a substance. The decision effectively rewrote the source code for Federal Rule of Evidence 702, making the reliability of the expert’s underlying methodology the universal admissibility standard.

This shift created a new, more coherent operational environment. The central query for the court is no longer whether to apply a [reliability standard](https://prime.greeks.live/area/reliability-standard/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), but how to apply it to a diverse spectrum of specialized knowledge.

> The Kumho Tire decision unified the standard for admitting expert testimony, making methodological reliability the gatekeeping requirement for all experts, not just scientists.

This systemic integration has profound implications. It requires a deeper strategic analysis from counsel when selecting and preparing any [expert witness](https://prime.greeks.live/area/expert-witness/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). The focus must be on deconstructing the expert’s reasoning process and demonstrating its internal logic and consistency within their specific field. For the tire failure analyst in the _Kumho_ case, this meant showing that his process of visual inspection and inference, while not a laboratory experiment, was a repeatable and dependable method used by other experts in his domain.

The ruling clarified that the list of specific factors mentioned in _Daubert_ ▴ such as peer review, publication, and known error rates ▴ was illustrative, not a rigid checklist. The new universal protocol is one of flexible, yet rigorous, inquiry. The trial court now has the mandate and the discretion to choose the most appropriate criteria for assessing the reliability of any given expert, from any given field. This demands a more sophisticated approach from litigators, who must now function as systems architects themselves, building a case for their expert’s reliability from the ground up.

![A sleek, symmetrical digital asset derivatives component. It represents an RFQ engine for high-fidelity execution of multi-leg spreads](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-for-optimized-market-microstructure.jpg)

![Abstract visualization of institutional RFQ protocol for digital asset derivatives. Translucent layers symbolize dark liquidity pools within complex market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine-6.jpg)

## Strategy

In the post-_Kumho_ litigation environment, the strategic imperative shifted from expert categorization to methodological validation. The decision rendered obsolete the tactic of shielding a “technical” or “experience-based” expert from a rigorous reliability challenge. Every expert, without exception, is now subject to a potential _Daubert_-style inquiry, compelling a fundamental change in how legal teams select, prepare, and present expert witnesses.

The new strategic framework is built upon the principle that the expert’s testimony must be presented as the output of a reliable, defensible process. The core task for counsel is to make the expert’s intellectual machinery transparent and prove its soundness to the judicial gatekeeper.

![A sleek, futuristic institutional grade platform with a translucent teal dome signifies a secure environment for private quotation and high-fidelity execution. A dark, reflective sphere represents an intelligence layer for algorithmic trading and price discovery within market microstructure, ensuring capital efficiency for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-rfq-execution-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-1.jpg)

## A New Framework for Expert Qualification

The primary strategic adjustment is a proactive focus on an expert’s methodology from the moment they are considered for a case. This involves a deep dive into the “how” and “why” of their conclusions. The Supreme Court’s emphasis on flexibility means that a single, one-size-fits-all approach to demonstrating reliability is ineffective. Instead, the strategy must be tailored to the specific discipline of the expert.

For an economist testifying on market damages, this might involve demonstrating the widespread acceptance of their valuation model. For a software engineer tracing the cause of a system failure, it could mean documenting a logical and repeatable debugging process. The objective is to construct a compelling narrative that the expert’s approach, while perhaps not “scientific” in the traditional sense, is systematic, principled, and relevant to the facts of the case.

> Strategically, Kumho demands that litigators prove the reliability of an expert’s specific methodology rather than simply defending their general qualifications or experience.

This proactive validation process serves a dual purpose. It prepares the expert to withstand the inevitable challenge from opposing counsel, and it provides the court with a clear, structured basis for admitting the testimony. The strategic goal is to present the court with a ready-made justification for its gatekeeping decision, framed in the language of reliability and intellectual rigor.

![A sophisticated digital asset derivatives trading mechanism features a central processing hub with luminous blue accents, symbolizing an intelligence layer driving high fidelity execution. Transparent circular elements represent dynamic liquidity pools and a complex volatility surface, revealing market microstructure and atomic settlement via an advanced RFQ protocol](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution-framework-optimizing-market-microstructure-price-discovery-intelligence-layer.jpg)

## What Is the Strategic Value of the Reliability Inquiry?

The strategic value lies in its universal application. Both proffering and opposing counsel operate on the same battlefield with the same set of rules. For the party presenting the expert, the strategy is to build a fortress of reliability around the expert’s opinion. For the party challenging the expert, the strategy is to find and exploit the weaknesses in that fortress.

The focus of the attack is no longer on the expert’s credentials, but on the intellectual journey they took to arrive at their conclusion. This has led to more sophisticated challenges, where opposing counsel might retain their own expert simply to critique the methodology of the primary expert, creating a “battle of the processes” for the judge to resolve.

The table below outlines the strategic shift in expert witness practice prompted by the _Kumho Tire_ decision.

### Table 1 ▴ Evolution of Expert Witness Strategy

| Strategic Consideration | Pre-Kumho Tire Framework | Post-Kumho Tire Framework |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Primary Focus | Categorizing the expert as “scientific” or “non-scientific” to determine which admissibility standard applied. | Demonstrating the reliability of the specific methodology used by any expert, regardless of their field. |
| Basis of Credibility | Heavy reliance on the expert’s general credentials, experience, and qualifications. | Emphasis on the transparency, consistency, and soundness of the expert’s reasoning process and methods. |
| Litigation Tactics | Arguments centered on whether the more stringent Daubert standard was applicable to the testimony. | Arguments centered on whether the expert’s specific methodology is reliable and “fits” the facts of the case. |
| Role of the Court | Acted as a gatekeeper primarily for “scientific” evidence, with a more lenient standard for other types. | Acts as a universal gatekeeper for all expert testimony, tasked with flexibly applying reliability criteria. |

![A precision-engineered metallic institutional trading platform, bisected by an execution pathway, features a central blue RFQ protocol engine. This Crypto Derivatives OS core facilitates high-fidelity execution, optimal price discovery, and multi-leg spread trading, reflecting advanced market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-core-facilitating-rfq-protocol-driven-optimal-price-discovery-and-multi-leg-spread-trading-for-capital-efficiency.jpg)

## Challenging an Opposing Expert

The strategy for challenging a non-scientific expert has become more surgical. A successful challenge requires moving beyond superficial attacks on an expert’s resume and instead performing a forensic deconstruction of their work. Key lines of inquiry include:

- **Methodological Flaws** ▴ Has the expert faithfully applied the stated methodology? Is the methodology itself recognized as reliable within [their field](https://prime.greeks.live/question/to-what-extent-does-the-consolidated-audit-trail-level-the-playing-field-between-large-and-small-trading-firms/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)? A common challenge is that the expert’s conclusion is based on “ipse dixit” ▴ an assertion without supporting reasoning.

- **Analytical Gaps** ▴ Is there an unexplained leap in logic between the data the expert reviewed and the opinion they reached? The court in _General Electric Co. v. Joiner_, a precursor to _Kumho_, affirmed that a court may exclude testimony where there is “simply too great an analytical gap between the data and the opinion proffered.”

- **Lack of “Fit”** ▴ Does the expert’s testimony, however reliable its basis, actually assist the jury in understanding a fact at issue? The testimony must have a valid connection to the pertinent inquiry.

Ultimately, the _Kumho_ decision integrated the system of expert admissibility, forcing a higher degree of strategic discipline on all parties. It transformed the process from a classification exercise into a substantive examination of intellectual rigor, making every expert’s methodology a potential battleground.

![A segmented circular diagram, split diagonally. Its core, with blue rings, represents the Prime RFQ Intelligence Layer driving High-Fidelity Execution for Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/high-speed-prime-os-rfq-digital-asset-derivatives-trade-execution.jpg)

![A sleek, multi-component device with a prominent lens, embodying a sophisticated RFQ workflow engine. Its modular design signifies integrated liquidity pools and dynamic price discovery for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-microstructure-2.jpg)

## Execution

Executing a [litigation strategy](https://prime.greeks.live/area/litigation-strategy/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) in the wake of _Kumho Tire_ requires a meticulous, process-oriented approach. The abstract strategic need to demonstrate reliability must be translated into a concrete set of actions and work products. For corporate counsel and trial lawyers, this means embedding the principles of _Kumho_ into the entire lifecycle of expert witness management, from initial selection to courtroom testimony. It is an operational discipline focused on building a robust, defensible record of methodological integrity.

![Modular institutional-grade execution system components reveal luminous green data pathways, symbolizing high-fidelity cross-asset connectivity. This depicts intricate market microstructure facilitating RFQ protocol integration for atomic settlement of digital asset derivatives within a Principal's operational framework, underpinned by a Prime RFQ intelligence layer](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/modular-high-fidelity-execution-architecture-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-integration-and-principals-operational-framework-optimization.jpg)

## The Operational Playbook for Qualifying a Non-Scientific Expert

This playbook provides a procedural guide for successfully navigating the [judicial gatekeeping](https://prime.greeks.live/area/judicial-gatekeeping/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) process with a non-scientific or technical expert. The objective is to construct an evidentiary record that makes the judge’s decision to admit the testimony a logical and well-supported conclusion.

- **Phase 1 Sourcing and Vetting**

<li>**Methodology First Screening** ▴ During the initial search, the primary inquiry should concern the candidate’s process. Ask them to articulate the step-by-step methodology they would use to analyze the problem at issue. An expert who cannot clearly explain their process is a significant risk.

- **Peer Community Validation** ▴ Inquire about the expert’s standing and the acceptance of their methods within their specific professional community. Do other practitioners in their field use a similar analytical process? While formal peer-reviewed publications may be rare, evidence of acceptance in trade journals, industry standards, or conference presentations can be powerful.

- **Prior Testimony Audit** ▴ Conduct a thorough review of the expert’s prior testimony and any judicial opinions on its admissibility. Identify any past challenges to their methodology and assess how they were resolved.

</li>
- **Phase 2 Report Generation and Fortification**

<li>**Explicit Methodological Section** ▴ The expert report must contain a distinct section titled “Methodology” or “Analytical Framework.” This section must transparently detail the process used, the data relied upon, and the logical steps taken to reach the ultimate conclusion.

- **Preemptive Rebuttal of Alternative Causes** ▴ The expert should address and rule out alternative explanations or causes. In the _Kumho_ case itself, the expert’s failure to adequately rebut the defense’s claim of tire abuse (overinflation or wear) was a critical weakness in his analysis.

- **Glossary of Terms** ▴ For highly technical fields, including a glossary that defines key terms and concepts can aid the court in understanding the expert’s domain and the sophistication of their approach.

</li>
- **Phase 3 Hearing and Testimony Preparation**

<li>**Simulated Cross-Examination** ▴ Conduct a rigorous mock cross-examination focused exclusively on the reliability and application of the expert’s methodology. The expert must be prepared to defend their process, not just their conclusion.

- **Simple Analogies for Complex Processes** ▴ Work with the expert to develop clear, simple analogies that can explain their complex technical process to a lay judge. This translates the jargon of their field into the language of logic and reliability.

- **Focus on Flexibility** ▴ Prepare the expert to explain why the traditional _Daubert_ factors (e.g. testability, error rate) may or may not be applicable to their specific type of analysis, and to propose alternative indicia of reliability that are appropriate for their field.

</li>

![A translucent institutional-grade platform reveals its RFQ execution engine with radiating intelligence layer pathways. Central price discovery mechanisms and liquidity pool access points are flanked by pre-trade analytics modules for digital asset derivatives and multi-leg spreads, ensuring high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-core-platform.jpg)

## How Do Courts Analyze Reliability across Different Fields?

The execution of the gatekeeping function is highly context-dependent. A judge will not apply the same reliability criteria to an accident reconstructionist as they would to a forensic accountant. The table below provides a granular analysis of how courts have adapted the reliability inquiry for various types of non-scientific experts, illustrating the flexible application of the _Kumho_ standard.

### Table 2 ▴ Judicial Application of Reliability Factors to Non-Scientific Experts

| Type of Expert | Primary Methodology | Common Reliability Indicators Applied by Courts | Common Grounds for Exclusion |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Mechanical Engineer | Failure analysis, visual inspection, comparison to exemplars, application of physics principles. | Consistency with established engineering principles, use of industry standards (e.g. ASTM), process of elimination, documentation of inspection protocol. | Failure to test a hypothesis, conclusions based on speculation, insufficient examination of the physical evidence. |
| Forensic Accountant | Tracing funds, calculating economic damages, analyzing financial statements for fraud indicators. | Adherence to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), use of standard valuation formulas, clear audit trail for calculations, peer review within the accounting firm. | Unsupported assumptions, failure to consider all relevant financial data, mathematical errors, methods not recognized by the accounting profession. |
| Law Enforcement Officer | Interpreting gang terminology or drug trade practices, accident reconstruction. | Extensive and relevant street experience, specialized training, reliance on established police procedures, corroboration with other evidence in the case. | Overly broad generalizations, testifying on ultimate issues of guilt or innocence, lack of specific foundation for the opinion. |
| Vocational Expert | Assessing an individual’s earning capacity and employability after an injury. | Reliance on government labor statistics, use of standardized vocational tests, conducting a thorough review of medical and employment records. | Ignoring key facts about the individual’s condition, relying on outdated or irrelevant job market data, speculation about future employment. |

![A central, intricate blue mechanism, evocative of an Execution Management System EMS or Prime RFQ, embodies algorithmic trading. Transparent rings signify dynamic liquidity pools and price discovery for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-framework-driving-high-fidelity-rfq-execution-and-optimized-market-microstructure-for-capital-efficiency.jpg)

## Predictive Scenario Analysis a Case Study in Execution

Consider a hypothetical commercial dispute where a plaintiff, “InnovateCorp,” sues a defendant, “BuildCo,” for breach of contract, alleging that BuildCo supplied a faulty custom-designed software module that caused a catastrophic failure in InnovateCorp’s logistics network. InnovateCorp’s damages model relies on the expert testimony of a seasoned logistics consultant, Dr. Eva Rostova, who has 25 years of experience but no peer-reviewed publications on software failure. BuildCo files a motion to exclude her testimony under _Kumho_.

InnovateCorp’s counsel executes a playbook to defend Dr. Rostova’s testimony. First, in her expert report, they ensure she dedicates an entire section to her “Root Cause Analysis Framework.” This framework is detailed as a five-step process ▴ 1) Isolate the point of failure within the network logs; 2) Replicate the failure condition on a sandboxed copy of the system; 3) Analyze the software module’s code for deviations from the contract’s technical specifications; 4) Compare the module’s performance metrics against industry benchmarks for similar systems; 5) Formulate and test a remediation patch to confirm the identified fault. This documented process transforms her experience-based opinion into a structured, repeatable analysis.

> The successful execution of a post-Kumho expert strategy hinges on translating an expert’s experience into a documented, defensible, and repeatable methodology.

During her deposition and the subsequent _Kumho_ hearing, InnovateCorp’s counsel prepares Dr. Rostova to articulate this framework. When BuildCo’s lawyer challenges her on the lack of peer-reviewed articles, she is prepared to respond. She explains that in the fast-moving field of custom enterprise software, formal publication is rare and that reliability is demonstrated through successful, real-world problem resolution. She points to her own detailed case files from two dozen prior engagements where she used the same five-step framework to successfully diagnose and resolve critical system failures for other clients.

She explains that while there is no formal “error rate” for her framework, its reliability is validated by its consistent success in predictive diagnostics. The judge, acting as the gatekeeper, is presented with a clear, logical, and field-tested methodology. The judge observes that while Dr. Rostova’s framework does not fit the traditional scientific mold, it is a systematic and relevant process that is far from mere speculation. The court denies the motion to exclude, finding that Dr. Rostova’s methodology has sufficient indicia of reliability to be presented to the jury, and that BuildCo’s critiques go to the weight of the evidence, not its admissibility. This outcome is a direct result of a deliberate, execution-focused strategy that anticipated and systematically dismantled the _Kumho_ challenge.

![A robust, dark metallic platform, indicative of an institutional-grade execution management system. Its precise, machined components suggest high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-platform-high-fidelity-price-discovery-and-atomic-settlement-infrastructure.jpg)

## References

- Black, Bert, et al. “Science and the Law in the Wake of Daubert ▴ A New Search for Scientific Knowledge.” _Texas Law Review_, vol. 72, no. 4, 1994, pp. 715-802.

- Breyer, Stephen. “Introduction to the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence.” _Federal Rules Decisions_, vol. 333, 2011, pp. 1-12.

- Carmichael v. Samyang Tires, Inc. 131 F.3d 1433 (11th Cir. 1997).

- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 509 U.S. 579 (1993).

- Dixon, Lloyd, and Brian Gill. “Changes in the Standards for Admitting Expert Evidence in Federal Civil Cases Since the Daubert Decision.” _RAND Institute for Civil Justice_, 2001.

- General Electric Co. v. Joiner, 522 U.S. 136 (1997).

- Gross, Samuel R. “Expert Evidence.” _Wisconsin Law Review_, 1991, p. 1113.

- Imwinkelried, Edward J. “The Next Step After Daubert ▴ Developing a Similarly Epistemological Approach to Ensuring the Reliability of Nonscientific Expert Testimony.” _Cardozo Law Review_, vol. 15, 1994, pp. 2271-2294.

- Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137 (1999).

- Lahav, Alexandra D. “The Case for ‘Trial by Formula’.” _Texas Law Review_, vol. 90, no. 3, 2012, pp. 571-636.

- Mnookin, Jennifer L. “Expert Evidence, Partisanship, and Epistemic Competence.” _Brooklyn Law Review_, vol. 73, no. 3, 2008, pp. 1009-1036.

- “Note, Reliability and Validity of Expert Testimony ▴ The Aftermath of Kumho Tire.” _Harvard Law Review_, vol. 113, no. 7, 2000, pp. 1833-1850.

![An intricate, transparent cylindrical system depicts a sophisticated RFQ protocol for digital asset derivatives. Internal glowing elements signify high-fidelity execution and algorithmic trading](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-protocol-architecture.jpg)

## Reflection

![A precise geometric prism reflects on a dark, structured surface, symbolizing institutional digital asset derivatives market microstructure. This visualizes block trade execution and price discovery for multi-leg spreads via RFQ protocols, ensuring high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency within Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-precision-execution.jpg)

## Recalibrating the Architecture of Proof

The integration of all expert testimony under a single, flexible reliability standard compels a deeper consideration of what constitutes “proof” in complex litigation. The _Kumho Tire_ decision was more than a procedural tweak; it was a philosophical one. It forces legal practitioners to move beyond reliance on credentials and to architect arguments from their foundational logic.

How does this universal demand for methodological transparency alter the way you construct and deconstruct arguments in your own practice? It suggests that the most potent legal strategies are those built on a bedrock of verifiable, systematic reasoning, applicable not just to expert witnesses but to the entire narrative of a case.

This systemic shift prompts a critical self-assessment. Does your current operational framework for vetting and preparing experts treat methodological rigor as the central pillar? The decision implicitly argues that the quality of an expert’s conclusion is inseparable from the quality of the process used to reach it.

Viewing the rules of evidence as an operating system, _Kumho_ was a patch that eliminated a critical vulnerability ▴ the inconsistent treatment of expert information. The challenge now is to optimize your own litigation programs to run efficiently on this upgraded system, ensuring every piece of expert analysis serves as a robust, reliable component within the larger architecture of your case.

![A sleek, metallic module with a dark, reflective sphere sits atop a cylindrical base, symbolizing an institutional-grade Crypto Derivatives OS. This system processes aggregated inquiries for RFQ protocols, enabling high-fidelity execution of multi-leg spreads while managing gamma exposure and slippage within dark pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-trading-crypto-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-system.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/expert-testimony/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Intricate mechanisms represent a Principal's operational framework, showcasing market microstructure of a Crypto Derivatives OS. Transparent elements signify real-time price discovery and high-fidelity execution, facilitating robust RFQ protocols for institutional digital asset derivatives and options trading](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-rfq-protocol-engine-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

## Expert Testimony

Meaning ▴ Expert testimony refers to the presentation of specialized knowledge, analysis, or opinion by a qualified individual within legal, regulatory, or arbitral proceedings. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/kumho-tire/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A central metallic mechanism, an institutional-grade Prime RFQ, anchors four colored quadrants. These symbolize multi-leg spread components and distinct liquidity pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-prime-os.jpg)

## Kumho Tire

Meaning ▴ The Kumho Tire module designates a specialized, proprietary execution protocol engineered within institutional digital asset trading systems to optimize the placement and settlement of large block orders across fragmented liquidity venues. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/reliability-standard/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precision-engineered component, like an RFQ protocol engine, displays a reflective blade and numerical data. It symbolizes high-fidelity execution within market microstructure, driving price discovery, capital efficiency, and algorithmic trading for institutional Digital Asset Derivatives on a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-execution-engine-core-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-price-discovery.jpg)

## Reliability Standard

Meaning ▴ A Reliability Standard defines the consistent and predictable operational performance of a system or protocol under specified conditions, ensuring that processes execute as designed with minimal deviation and maximum uptime. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/expert-witness/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Multi-faceted, reflective geometric form against dark void, symbolizing complex market microstructure of institutional digital asset derivatives. Sharp angles depict high-fidelity execution, price discovery via RFQ protocols, enabling liquidity aggregation for block trades, optimizing capital efficiency through a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-liquidity-aggregation-engine.jpg)

## Expert Witness

Meaning ▴ An Expert Witness functions as a specialized informational module within a legal or regulatory framework, tasked with providing objective, data-driven analysis and interpretation on complex technical or financial matters. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/to-what-extent-does-the-consolidated-audit-trail-level-the-playing-field-between-large-and-small-trading-firms/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precision institutional interface features a vertical display, control knobs, and a sharp element. This RFQ Protocol system ensures High-Fidelity Execution and optimal Price Discovery, facilitating Liquidity Aggregation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-platform-interface.jpg)

## Their Field

The Consolidated Audit Trail enhances regulatory oversight, which may level the playing field by deterring misconduct, but imposes scalable costs that can challenge smaller firms. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/litigation-strategy/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![An intricate, high-precision mechanism symbolizes an Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives RFQ protocol. Its sleek off-white casing protects the core market microstructure, while the teal-edged component signifies high-fidelity execution and optimal price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-market-microstructure-optimization.jpg)

## Litigation Strategy

Meaning ▴ A Litigation Strategy represents a pre-defined, structured framework for managing and resolving legal disputes that arise within the operational context of institutional digital asset derivatives trading. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/judicial-gatekeeping/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A split spherical mechanism reveals intricate internal components. This symbolizes an Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives Prime RFQ, enabling high-fidelity RFQ protocol execution, optimal price discovery, and atomic settlement for block trades and multi-leg spreads](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-revealing-rfq-execution-core-mechanics.jpg)

## Judicial Gatekeeping

Meaning ▴ Judicial Gatekeeping, within a digital asset derivatives framework, defines the programmatic controls and validation mechanisms that determine the admissibility of data, transactions, or user actions into core system components. </a>

**Tags:** [Product Liability Law](https://options.greeks.live/area/product-liability-law/), [Expert Witness Methodology](https://options.greeks.live/area/expert-witness-methodology/), [Non-Scientific Expert Testimony](https://options.greeks.live/area/non-scientific-expert-testimony/), [Reliability Standard](https://options.greeks.live/area/reliability-standard/), [Technical Expertise](https://options.greeks.live/area/technical-expertise/), [Expert Witness](https://options.greeks.live/area/expert-witness/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [What Is the Role of the Expert’s Mandate in Preventing Future Legal Disputes?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-role-of-the-experts-mandate-in-preventing-future-legal-disputes/)
![A precise, multi-layered disk embodies a dynamic Volatility Surface or deep Liquidity Pool for Digital Asset Derivatives. Dual metallic probes symbolize Algorithmic Trading and RFQ protocol inquiries, driving Price Discovery and High-Fidelity Execution of Multi-Leg Spreads within a Principal's operational framework.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-rfq-protocol-mechanism-for-digital-asset-derivatives-price-discovery-and-high-fidelity-execution-via-prime-os.jpg)

The expert's mandate is a contractual mechanism for resolving technical disputes with finality, preventing escalation to costly litigation.

- 
### [How Does the Daubert Standard Differ from the Frye Standard in Practice?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-daubert-standard-differ-from-the-frye-standard-in-practice/)
![Stacked, glossy modular components depict an institutional-grade Digital Asset Derivatives platform. Layers signify RFQ protocol orchestration, high-fidelity execution, and liquidity aggregation. This Prime RFQ architecture manages market microstructure, enabling price discovery and atomic settlement.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/layered-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-stack-for-prime-brokerage.jpg)

The Daubert standard tasks the judge with assessing evidentiary reliability; the Frye standard defers to scientific community consensus.

- 
### [How Does a Court Objectively Assess Commercial Reasonableness in a Derivatives Dispute?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-court-objectively-assess-commercial-reasonableness-in-a-derivatives-dispute/)
![Two distinct components, beige and green, are securely joined by a polished blue metallic element. This embodies a high-fidelity RFQ protocol for institutional digital asset derivatives, ensuring atomic settlement and optimal liquidity. It visualizes best execution within market microstructure, supporting multi-leg spread strategies on a Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-rfq-protocol-for-digital-asset-derivatives-high-fidelity-link.jpg)

A court objectively assesses commercial reasonableness by forensically examining the valuation process and its outcome against prevailing market standards.

- 
### [In What Ways Does the Gatekeeping Role Impact the Outcome of Complex Commercial Litigation?](https://options.greeks.live/question/in-what-ways-does-the-gatekeeping-role-impact-the-outcome-of-complex-commercial-litigation/)
![A sophisticated metallic mechanism with integrated translucent teal pathways on a dark background. This abstract visualizes the intricate market microstructure of an institutional digital asset derivatives platform, specifically the RFQ engine facilitating private quotation and block trade execution. It underscores high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement within a secure Prime RFQ, revealing latent liquidity and capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/systemic-framework-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-price-discovery-and-atomic-settlement.jpg)

The judicial gatekeeping role determines litigation outcomes by filtering expert evidence and managing case flow toward settlement.

- 
### [What Is the Role of an Expert Witness in a Level 3 Valuation Dispute?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-role-of-an-expert-witness-in-a-level-3-valuation-dispute/)
![Modular institutional-grade execution system components reveal luminous green data pathways, symbolizing high-fidelity cross-asset connectivity. This depicts intricate market microstructure facilitating RFQ protocol integration for atomic settlement of digital asset derivatives within a Principal's operational framework, underpinned by a Prime RFQ intelligence layer.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/modular-high-fidelity-execution-architecture-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-integration-and-principals-operational-framework-optimization.jpg)

An expert witness in a Level 3 valuation dispute provides an objective, defensible framework for valuing illiquid assets.

- 
### [What Are the Key Differences between the Daubert and Frye Standards?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-between-the-daubert-and-frye-standards/)
![Precision-engineered device with central lens, symbolizing Prime RFQ Intelligence Layer for institutional digital asset derivatives. Facilitates RFQ protocol optimization, driving price discovery for Bitcoin options and Ethereum futures. Robust design ensures high-fidelity execution, capital efficiency, and counterparty risk mitigation.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-institutional-rfq-protocol-engine-for-digital-asset-derivatives-options-trading.jpg)

The Daubert standard mandates judicial gatekeeping of scientific reliability, while Frye defers to general acceptance within the expert community.

- 
### [How Can an Expert’s Qualifications Be Challenged Even If They Have a Phd?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-experts-qualifications-be-challenged-even-if-they-have-a-phd/)
![Two sleek, distinct colored planes, teal and blue, intersect. Dark, reflective spheres at their cross-points symbolize critical price discovery nodes. This abstract visual depicts dynamic liquidity pools and high-fidelity execution protocols within an institutional RFQ framework, enabling efficient multi-leg spread trading of digital asset derivatives.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-multi-leg-execution-liquidity.jpg)

An expert's PhD is challenged by demonstrating their specific knowledge, methodology, or objectivity fails the court's data validation protocols.

- 
### [Could a Similar Determination Committee Structure Be Applied to the Digital Asset Derivatives Market?](https://options.greeks.live/question/could-a-similar-determination-committee-structure-be-applied-to-the-digital-asset-derivatives-market/)
![A precise metallic central hub with sharp, grey angular blades signifies high-fidelity execution and smart order routing. Intersecting transparent teal planes represent layered liquidity pools and multi-leg spread structures, illustrating complex market microstructure for efficient price discovery within institutional digital asset derivatives RFQ protocols.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-for-high-fidelity-execution-across-market-microstructure-dynamics.jpg)

A Determination Committee structure can be applied to digital asset derivatives by adapting its function to adjudicate technical "Disruption Events."

- 
### [What Are the Most Common Grounds for Challenging a Party-Appointed Expert in Arbitration Proceedings?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-grounds-for-challenging-a-party-appointed-expert-in-arbitration-proceedings/)
![A modular institutional trading interface displays a precision trackball and granular controls on a teal execution module. Parallel surfaces symbolize layered market microstructure within a Principal's operational framework, enabling high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-controls.jpg)

The most common grounds for challenging a party-appointed expert are rooted in threats to procedural integrity, such as conflicts of interest or breaches of confidentiality.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "How Has the Kumho Tire Decision Affected the Admissibility of Non-Scientific Expert Testimony?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-has-the-kumho-tire-decision-affected-the-admissibility-of-non-scientific-expert-testimony/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-has-the-kumho-tire-decision-affected-the-admissibility-of-non-scientific-expert-testimony/"
    },
    "headline": "How Has the Kumho Tire Decision Affected the Admissibility of Non-Scientific Expert Testimony? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "The Kumho Tire decision mandated that judges act as gatekeepers for all expert testimony, ensuring its reliability and relevance. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-has-the-kumho-tire-decision-affected-the-admissibility-of-non-scientific-expert-testimony/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-05T12:54:54+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-08-05T12:54:54+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine-6.jpg",
        "caption": "This abstract graphic illustrates a robust institutional RFQ protocol for digital asset derivatives, optimizing market microstructure interaction. Overlapping translucent forms represent dark liquidity pools and dynamic order book dynamics, while a central multi-layered conduit signifies high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement. Strategic mint green nodes act as private quotation points, facilitating aggregated inquiry for efficient price discovery and best execution within a secure Prime RFQ environment."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Admissibility of Evidence",
        "Daubert Standard",
        "Expert Testimony",
        "Expert Witness",
        "Expert Witness Methodology",
        "Judicial Gatekeeping",
        "Kumho Tire",
        "Kumho Tire V. Carmichael",
        "Litigation Strategy",
        "Non-Scientific Expert Testimony",
        "Product Liability Law",
        "Reliability Standard",
        "Technical Expertise"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "FAQPage",
    "mainEntity": [
        {
            "@type": "Question",
            "name": "What Is The Strategic Value Of The Reliability Inquiry?",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "@type": "Answer",
                "text": "The strategic value lies in its universal application. Both proffering and opposing counsel operate on the same battlefield with the same set of rules. For the party presenting the expert, the strategy is to build a fortress of reliability around the expert's opinion. For the party challenging the expert, the strategy is to find and exploit the weaknesses in that fortress. The focus of the attack is no longer on the expert's credentials, but on the intellectual journey they took to arrive at their conclusion. This has led to more sophisticated challenges, where opposing counsel might retain their own expert simply to critique the methodology of the primary expert, creating a \"battle of the processes\" for the judge to resolve."
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Question",
            "name": "How Do Courts Analyze Reliability Across Different Fields?",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "@type": "Answer",
                "text": "The execution of the gatekeeping function is highly context-dependent. A judge will not apply the same reliability criteria to an accident reconstructionist as they would to a forensic accountant. The table below provides a granular analysis of how courts have adapted the reliability inquiry for various types of non-scientific experts, illustrating the flexible application of the Kumho standard."
            }
        }
    ]
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/how-has-the-kumho-tire-decision-affected-the-admissibility-of-non-scientific-expert-testimony/
