# How Many Quotes Are Considered 'Sufficient' to Demonstrate Best Execution in an RFQ Process under MiFID II? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-07
**Categories:** Question

---

![A sophisticated teal and black device with gold accents symbolizes a Principal's operational framework for institutional digital asset derivatives. It represents a high-fidelity execution engine, integrating RFQ protocols for atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-core-engine-for-best-execution.jpg)

![A central processing core with intersecting, transparent structures revealing intricate internal components and blue data flows. This symbolizes an institutional digital asset derivatives platform's Prime RFQ, orchestrating high-fidelity execution, managing aggregated RFQ inquiries, and ensuring atomic settlement within dynamic market microstructure, optimizing capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-system-facilitating-high-fidelity-rfq-protocol-optimization-for-best-execution-and-atomic-settlement.jpg)

## Concept

The question of what constitutes a “sufficient” number of quotes in a Request for Quote (RFQ) process [under MiFID](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-operational-consequences-of-misreporting-under-mifid-ii-versus-a-reporting-failure-under-emir/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) II is a foundational query for any trading desk operating within European markets. The architecture of the regulation deliberately avoids prescribing a simple integer. There is no magic number. The directive’s silence on a specific quantity ▴ be it three, five, or ten ▴ is itself the most critical piece of information.

It shifts the burden of proof from a quantitative tally to a qualitative, demonstrable process. The core of the matter resides not in the quantity of quotes solicited, but in the integrity and intellectual rigor of the execution methodology a firm employs and can substantiate.

MiFID II elevates the standard from “all reasonable steps” to “[all sufficient steps](https://prime.greeks.live/area/all-sufficient-steps/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)” to obtain the best possible result for a client. This linguistic recalibration is significant. “Reasonable” implies a standard of conduct that is fair and sensible in the circumstances. “Sufficient,” conversely, implies a standard that is adequate to achieve a specific purpose ▴ in this case, the best possible outcome for the client.

This moves the requirement from one of effort to one of efficacy. The firm must design and operate a system that can consistently deliver and evidence superior [execution quality](https://prime.greeks.live/area/execution-quality/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). Therefore, the inquiry into the number of quotes is, in essence, a proxy for a much deeper question ▴ “Is our execution framework robust enough to defend our client outcomes under regulatory scrutiny?”

> The regulatory framework under MiFID II purposefully refrains from setting a fixed number of required quotes, emphasizing instead the demonstrable sufficiency of the overall execution process.

This framework compels firms to move beyond a check-the-box mentality. A firm could solicit ten quotes and still fail the test of [best execution](https://prime.greeks.live/area/best-execution/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) if the selection of counterparties was flawed, the market context was ignored, or the data from the process was inadequately captured. Conversely, in a highly illiquid or specialized market, soliciting quotes from two or three of the only viable [liquidity providers](https://prime.greeks.live/area/liquidity-providers/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) and documenting this rationale could be deemed entirely sufficient.

The emphasis is on the firm’s ability to provide a coherent narrative, supported by data, that justifies its actions as being in the client’s best interest across a range of execution factors. These factors include not only price and costs but also speed, likelihood of execution, size, and any other relevant consideration.

Ultimately, the concept of “sufficiency” is dynamic and context-dependent. It is a function of the instrument’s characteristics, the prevailing [market conditions](https://prime.greeks.live/area/market-conditions/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), the client’s specific instructions, and the firm’s own technological and operational capabilities. The question is not “how many?” but “why these, and why now?” Answering this requires a system of record and a decision-making process that is clear, repeatable, and, above all, defensible.

![A central metallic RFQ engine anchors radiating segmented panels, symbolizing diverse liquidity pools and market segments. Varying shades denote distinct execution venues within the complex market microstructure, facilitating price discovery for institutional digital asset derivatives with minimal slippage and latency via high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principals-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-nexus.jpg)

![A transparent glass bar, representing high-fidelity execution and precise RFQ protocols, extends over a white sphere symbolizing a deep liquidity pool for institutional digital asset derivatives. A small glass bead signifies atomic settlement within the granular market microstructure, supported by robust Prime RFQ infrastructure ensuring optimal price discovery and minimal slippage](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-prime-os-intelligence-layer-facilitating-optimal-price-discovery-and-best-execution.jpg)

## Strategy

Developing a strategic framework for demonstrating best execution in an [RFQ process](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfq-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) requires a systemic approach that integrates counterparty management, data analysis, and dynamic response to market conditions. The objective is to build a defensible process that proves “all [sufficient steps](https://prime.greeks.live/area/sufficient-steps/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)” were taken. This is less about a rigid set of rules and more about an adaptive operational logic.

![A metallic rod, symbolizing a high-fidelity execution pipeline, traverses transparent elements representing atomic settlement nodes and real-time price discovery. It rests upon distinct institutional liquidity pools, reflecting optimized RFQ protocols for crypto derivatives trading across a complex volatility surface within Prime RFQ market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trade-execution-pipeline-optimizing-rfq-protocols-for-best-execution-and-capital-efficiency.jpg)

## The Pillars of a Defensible RFQ Strategy

A robust strategy rests on three core pillars ▴ [Counterparty Selection](https://prime.greeks.live/area/counterparty-selection/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), Dynamic Calibration, and Evidentiary Foundation. Each pillar addresses a critical aspect of the MiFID II obligation, moving beyond simple price-taking to a sophisticated, multi-factor assessment of execution quality.

![The abstract image features angular, parallel metallic and colored planes, suggesting structured market microstructure for digital asset derivatives. A spherical element represents a block trade or RFQ protocol inquiry, reflecting dynamic implied volatility and price discovery within a dark pool](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/optimized-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-framework-ensuring-principal-best-execution-and-latent-liquidity-capture.jpg)

## Counterparty Selection and Tiering

The universe of potential counterparties is not homogenous. A sophisticated strategy involves segmenting liquidity providers into tiers based on historical performance, reliability, and specialization. This is a crucial prerequisite to determining the appropriate number of quotes for any given trade.

- **Tier 1 Liquidity Providers** ▴ These are counterparties that consistently provide competitive pricing, demonstrate high fill rates, and have a deep capacity for the specific asset class. They form the core group for most RFQs.

- **Tier 2 Specialist Providers** ▴ This group includes providers who may not be competitive across all products but offer exceptional liquidity or pricing for niche instruments, complex derivatives, or under specific market conditions.

- **Tier 3 Opportunistic Providers** ▴ These are counterparties engaged less frequently, perhaps for very large-in-scale (LIS) orders or during periods of extreme market stress where their unique balance sheet capacity becomes relevant.

The strategy here is not to solicit quotes from every available counterparty for every trade. Instead, the system should intelligently select a pool of counterparties from these tiers based on the specific characteristics of the order ▴ instrument type, size, and urgency. For a standard, liquid bond, soliciting quotes from a competitive set of three to five Tier 1 providers might be sufficient.

For a complex, multi-leg options strategy, the optimal approach might involve two Tier 1 providers and two Tier 2 specialists. The rationale for the selection of this pool is the first layer of demonstrating a sufficient process.

![A crystalline droplet, representing a block trade or liquidity pool, rests precisely on an advanced Crypto Derivatives OS platform. Its internal shimmering particles signify aggregated order flow and implied volatility data, demonstrating high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency within market microstructure, facilitating private quotation via RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-rfq-protocol-best-execution.jpg)

## Dynamic Calibration of the RFQ Process

A static “always ask five banks” rule is brittle and strategically weak. The number and nature of solicited quotes must be calibrated dynamically based on real-time and historical data. This calibration considers several factors:

- **Instrument [Liquidity Profile](https://prime.greeks.live/question/does-the-underlying-assets-liquidity-profile-determine-the-optimal-execution-protocol/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)** ▴ The system must differentiate between a highly liquid government bond and a thinly traded corporate credit or an OTC derivative. For the former, a wider competitive auction is appropriate. For the latter, the focus shifts to identifying the few counterparties with genuine axes of interest.

- **Market Volatility** ▴ In periods of high volatility, the likelihood of execution and the speed of response become more critical than marginal price improvements. The strategy might involve sending RFQs to a smaller group of highly reliable counterparties to ensure firm pricing and swift execution. The median time between RFQ and quote becomes a key performance indicator to monitor.

- **[Order Size](https://prime.greeks.live/area/order-size/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)** ▴ A small, easily digestible order can be competitively priced by a broad range of providers. A large block trade, however, introduces the risk of information leakage and market impact. The strategy for a large order may involve a sequential RFQ process, initially approaching a single trusted provider before cautiously widening the inquiry if necessary. This minimizes signaling risk.

> An effective RFQ strategy is not static; it dynamically adjusts the number and selection of counterparties based on the specific characteristics of the order and prevailing market conditions.

![A sophisticated RFQ engine module, its spherical lens observing market microstructure and reflecting implied volatility. This Prime RFQ component ensures high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives, enabling private quotation for block trades](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-for-best-execution-protocol.jpg)

## Building the Evidentiary Foundation

The entire strategic framework must be built on a foundation of robust data capture and analysis. This is what makes the process demonstrable and defensible. The system must log every step of the [RFQ workflow](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfq-workflow/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), from the initial rationale for counterparty selection to the final execution details.

The table below outlines a comparison of two strategic approaches to managing RFQs. The “Static” approach represents a baseline, compliance-oriented mindset, while the “Dynamic” approach embodies a more sophisticated, performance-driven system aligned with the spirit of MiFID II.

| Strategic Component | Static RFQ Approach (Baseline Compliance) | Dynamic RFQ System (Advanced Strategy) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Counterparty Selection | A fixed list of 3-5 providers is used for all RFQs within an asset class. | Counterparties are selected from tiered pools based on the instrument’s liquidity profile, historical performance data, and the specific nature of the order. |
| Number of Quotes | A predetermined number of quotes (e.g. “always 3”) is solicited, regardless of market conditions or order size. | The number of quotes solicited is algorithmically suggested based on volatility, order size relative to average daily volume, and instrument complexity. |
| Execution Factor Weighting | Price and cost are the primary, and often sole, factors considered in the decision. | A multi-factor model is used, weighting price, cost, speed, and likelihood of execution differently based on the client’s instructions and market state. |
| Post-Trade Analysis | Execution data is stored for audit purposes. Analysis is typically performed manually and on an ad-hoc basis. | Automated Transaction Cost Analysis (TCA) is performed on every RFQ, comparing the winning quote against the other quotes received and relevant market benchmarks. This data feeds back into the counterparty tiering system. |
| Documentation | Records show that a certain number of quotes were requested. | Records provide a complete narrative ▴ why this set of counterparties was chosen, why this number of quotes was deemed sufficient, and how the final execution decision was made against all relevant factors. |

By adopting a dynamic and evidence-based strategy, a firm shifts the conversation with regulators away from a simple count of quotes. The focus becomes a demonstration of a sophisticated, intelligent system designed to consistently protect the client’s interests by taking all genuinely sufficient steps to secure the best possible outcome.

![Sharp, intersecting elements, two light, two teal, on a reflective disc, centered by a precise mechanism. This visualizes institutional liquidity convergence for multi-leg options strategies in digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-block-trade-execution.jpg)

![Layered abstract forms depict a Principal's Prime RFQ for institutional digital asset derivatives. A textured band signifies robust RFQ protocol and market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-high-fidelity-execution-prime-os-market-microstructure.jpg)

## Execution

The execution of a MiFID II-compliant RFQ process is the operational manifestation of the firm’s strategic framework. It translates policy into a series of precise, repeatable, and auditable actions. The central challenge is to create a workflow that is both efficient for traders and produces an evidentiary record of sufficient depth to withstand regulatory scrutiny. This requires a fusion of technology, defined procedure, and quantitative oversight.

![A complex, multi-layered electronic component with a central connector and fine metallic probes. This represents a critical Prime RFQ module for institutional digital asset derivatives trading, enabling high-fidelity execution of RFQ protocols, price discovery, and atomic settlement for multi-leg spreads with minimal latency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-engine-driving-best-execution-and-liquidity.jpg)

## An Operational Playbook for Compliant RFQs

A best-in-class execution workflow can be broken down into distinct stages, each with specific procedural requirements and data capture obligations. This playbook ensures that every RFQ is handled consistently and that the rationale behind every decision is recorded.

- **Order Ingestion and Pre-Trade Analysis** ▴ 

<li>**Action** ▴ The client order is received and ingested into the Order Management System (OMS).

- **System Check** ▴ The system automatically enriches the order with pre-trade analytics. This includes classifying the instrument by liquidity profile (e.g. Liquid, Less Liquid, Illiquid), fetching historical volatility data, and calculating the order’s size relative to the standard market size (SMS) or average daily volume (ADV).

- **Documentation** ▴ The initial order details and the system-generated pre-trade analytics are logged. This forms the baseline context for the trade.

</li>
- **Intelligent Counterparty Selection** ▴ 

<li>**Action** ▴ Based on the pre-trade analysis, the system proposes a list of counterparties for the RFQ.

- **System Logic** ▴ The selection algorithm draws from the firm’s tiered counterparty database. For a liquid, standard-sized order, it may select five providers from Tier 1. For an illiquid instrument, it might suggest two providers from Tier 2 and one from Tier 1 known to have an axe. The trader retains the ability to override the suggestion but must provide a specific reason (e.g. “Counterparty X has shown a strong axe in this name today”).

- **Documentation** ▴ The proposed counterparty list, the final selected list, and any trader-provided rationale for deviation are logged. This directly addresses the “why these counterparties” question.

</li>
- **RFQ Dissemination and Monitoring** ▴ 

<li>**Action** ▴ The RFQ is sent to the selected counterparties, either simultaneously or in a staggered sequence for large orders to mitigate information leakage.

- **System Monitoring** ▴ The system actively monitors the state of each RFQ. It tracks the time to receive each quote, flags non-responsive counterparties, and displays incoming quotes in a normalized format (e.g. converting all quotes to a common spread or yield basis).

- **Documentation** ▴ Timestamps for RFQ submission, quote receipt, and any quote modifications or withdrawals are recorded for each counterparty.

</li>
- **Execution Decision and Justification** ▴ 

<li>**Action** ▴ The trader executes the order against the chosen quote.

- **System Support** ▴ The platform highlights the best quote based on Total Consideration (Price + Costs). However, it also displays other execution factors, such as the counterparty’s historical fill ratio or the speed of their response. If the trader chooses a quote other than the one with the best price, a justification prompt appears, requiring a reason (e.g. “Better certainty of execution with CP B due to market volatility,” “CP A’s quote was firm, while CP C’s was subject to last look”).

- **Documentation** ▴ The winning quote, the losing quotes, the final execution price and costs, and any trader justification for the decision are logged. This creates the core evidence of the multi-factor assessment.

</li>
- **Post-Trade Reconciliation and Analysis** ▴ 

<li>**Action** ▴ The execution is confirmed, and the post-trade process is initiated.

- **System Automation** ▴ The system automatically generates a [Transaction Cost Analysis](https://prime.greeks.live/area/transaction-cost-analysis/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (TCA) report for the execution. This report compares the execution price against a range of benchmarks ▴ the other quotes received (cost of not trading with the best price), the arrival price, and relevant market composites (e.g. evaluated pricing for bonds).

- **Documentation** ▴ The full TCA report is appended to the order’s audit trail. This data is then used to periodically update the counterparty tiering and performance metrics.

</li>

![A symmetrical, angular mechanism with illuminated internal components against a dark background, abstractly representing a high-fidelity execution engine for institutional digital asset derivatives. This visualizes the market microstructure and algorithmic trading precision essential for RFQ protocols, multi-leg spread strategies, and atomic settlement within a Principal OS framework, ensuring capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-execution-engine-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq.jpg)

## Quantitative Modeling and Data Analysis

To support this playbook, the firm must maintain a robust data infrastructure. The goal is to move from subjective decision-making to a quantitative, data-driven process. The following tables illustrate the types of data that must be captured and analyzed.

![A fractured, polished disc with a central, sharp conical element symbolizes fragmented digital asset liquidity. This Principal RFQ engine ensures high-fidelity execution, precise price discovery, and atomic settlement within complex market microstructure, optimizing capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-rfq-engine-unifying-fragmented-digital-asset-derivatives-liquidity-for-best-execution.jpg)

## Table 1 ▴ Sample RFQ Execution Log

This log provides a granular, timestamped record of a single RFQ event, forming the primary source of evidence for audit.

| Field | Example Data Point | Purpose |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Order ID | ORD-20250807-001 | Unique identifier for the client order. |
| Instrument | DBR 0.50% 15/02/2030 | The specific financial instrument being traded. |
| Order Size | €25,000,000 | The nominal value of the order. |
| Pre-Trade Liquidity Profile | Liquid | System-generated classification. |
| Counterparty Pool Justification | Standard Liquid Govt Bond Protocol | Rationale for the number and type of counterparties selected. |
| RFQ Sent Timestamp | 2025-08-07 14:30:01.123 UTC | Time of RFQ dissemination. |
| Counterparty A Quote | 101.50 (Received 14:30:02.541) | Price and response time from Counterparty A. |
| Counterparty B Quote | 101.51 (Received 14:30:02.987) | Price and response time from Counterparty B. |
| Counterparty C Quote | 101.49 (Received 14:30:03.105) | Price and response time from Counterparty C. |
| Counterparty D Quote | 101.52 (Received 14:30:03.511) | Price and response time from Counterparty D. |
| Winning Quote | Counterparty D @ 101.52 | Identifies the executed quote. |
| Execution Justification | N/A (Best price selected) | Trader justification if not executing at the best price. |
| Execution Timestamp | 2025-08-07 14:30:04.200 UTC | Time of trade execution. |

![A metallic stylus balances on a central fulcrum, symbolizing a Prime RFQ orchestrating high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives. This visualizes price discovery within market microstructure, ensuring capital efficiency and best execution through RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-for-digital-asset-derivatives-low-latency-best-execution.jpg)

## Table 2 ▴ Quarterly Counterparty Performance Review

This analysis aggregates data from thousands of RFQs to quantitatively assess liquidity providers, feeding back into the counterparty tiering system.

| Counterparty | Asset Class | RFQs Responded To | Response Rate (%) | Median Response Time (ms) | Price Competitiveness Score | Fill Ratio (%) | Recommended Tier |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Bank A | EUR IG Corp | 1,250 | 98% | 450 | 92.5 | 99% | 1 |
| Bank B | EUR IG Corp | 1,180 | 95% | 600 | 88.1 | 97% | 1 |
| Broker C | EUR IG Corp | 950 | 90% | 850 | 93.2 | 94% | 2 |
| Bank D | EUR HY Corp | 400 | 85% | 1,200 | 95.8 | 98% | 1 (Specialist) |
| Broker E | EUR IG Corp | 700 | 75% | 2,100 | 75.4 | 80% | 3 |

_ Price Competitiveness Score ▴ A proprietary metric calculated based on how frequently the counterparty’s quote is at or near the best price received._

> A defensible execution process relies on a detailed, quantitative audit trail that justifies not only the final trade but every preceding decision in the RFQ workflow.

By implementing this level of operational and analytical rigor, a firm moves the discussion about sufficiency away from an arbitrary number. The sufficiency of the process is proven by the quality of the data it generates and the intelligence of the system that governs it. It demonstrates that the firm has engineered a framework to take all sufficient steps, providing a robust, evidence-based defense of its execution quality under MiFID II.

![A sleek, angular metallic system, an algorithmic trading engine, features a central intelligence layer. It embodies high-fidelity RFQ protocols, optimizing price discovery and best execution for institutional digital asset derivatives, managing counterparty risk and slippage](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-for-best-execution.jpg)

## References

- European Parliament and Council of the European Union. (2014). Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on markets in financial instruments. _Official Journal of the European Union_, L 173/349.

- European Securities and Markets Authority. (2017). _Questions and Answers on MiFID II and MiFIR investor protection and intermediaries topics_ (ESMA35-43-349).

- European Commission. (2017). Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/565 of 25 April 2016 supplementing Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards organisational requirements and operating conditions for investment firms and defined terms for the purposes of that Directive.

- Financial Conduct Authority. (2017). _Best execution and order handling_. In FCA Handbook, COBS 11.2.

- ICMA. (2017). _MiFID II/R Fixed Income Best Execution Requirements_. International Capital Market Association.

- AFME. (2018). _AFME Best Execution Reporting ▴ RTS 27 & 28 Q&A_. Association for Financial Markets in Europe.

- Oxera. (2016). _Best execution requirements under MiFID II ▴ A brave new world?_ Oxera Consulting LLP.

- Lehalle, C. A. & Laruelle, S. (2013). _Market Microstructure in Practice_. World Scientific Publishing.

- Harris, L. (2003). _Trading and Exchanges ▴ Market Microstructure for Practitioners_. Oxford University Press.

- O’Hara, M. (1995). _Market Microstructure Theory_. Blackwell Publishing.

![A polished glass sphere reflecting diagonal beige, black, and cyan bands, rests on a metallic base against a dark background. This embodies RFQ-driven Price Discovery and High-Fidelity Execution for Digital Asset Derivatives, optimizing Market Microstructure and mitigating Counterparty Risk via Prime RFQ Private Quotation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-best-execution-protocol.jpg)

## Reflection

![Stacked, distinct components, subtly tilted, symbolize the multi-tiered institutional digital asset derivatives architecture. Layers represent RFQ protocols, private quotation aggregation, core liquidity pools, and atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/layered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-optimizing-principal-execution-management-systems-for-best-execution.jpg)

## From Sufficiency to Systemic Advantage

The exploration of “sufficiency” within the MiFID II framework ultimately leads to a more profound institutional introspection. The regulatory requirement, while framed as an obligation, provides the blueprint for constructing a superior execution apparatus. The systems built to satisfy this mandate ▴ the data capture, the quantitative analysis, the dynamic counterparty management ▴ are the very same systems that generate a durable competitive edge. They transform the trading function from a cost center focused on reactive execution to a strategic hub of proprietary market intelligence.

The data harvested from a rigorous RFQ process becomes a unique asset. It offers a real-time, granular view into the behavior and appetite of liquidity providers that cannot be purchased from any vendor. This proprietary flow information, when analyzed systematically, allows a firm to anticipate market dynamics, identify pockets of liquidity before they are widely apparent, and manage risk with greater precision. The process of demonstrating best execution, therefore, becomes a byproduct of the pursuit of best-in-class operational intelligence.

Consider the long-term implications of this operational posture. A firm that masters this data-driven approach is not merely compliant; it is building an ecosystem of continuous improvement. Each trade enriches the firm’s understanding of its counterparties and the market’s microstructure. This knowledge, in turn, refines the execution strategy for the next trade.

The focus shifts from defending past actions to engineering future outperformance. The regulatory burden is thus reframed as a catalyst for creating a more intelligent, adaptive, and ultimately more profitable trading operation. The final question for any institution is how it can leverage this regulatory architecture to build a lasting strategic asset.

![A sleek, cream and dark blue institutional trading terminal with a dark interactive display. It embodies a proprietary Prime RFQ, facilitating secure RFQ protocols for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-terminal-for-best-execution.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-operational-consequences-of-misreporting-under-mifid-ii-versus-a-reporting-failure-under-emir/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A teal-blue textured sphere, signifying a unique RFQ inquiry or private quotation, precisely mounts on a metallic, institutional-grade base. Integrated into a Prime RFQ framework, it illustrates high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement for digital asset derivatives within market microstructure, ensuring capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-prime-os-execution-1.jpg)

## Under Mifid

A MiFID II misreport corrupts market surveillance data; an EMIR failure hides systemic risk, creating distinct operational and reputational threats. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/all-sufficient-steps/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A central core represents a Prime RFQ engine, facilitating high-fidelity execution. Transparent, layered structures denote aggregated liquidity pools and multi-leg spread strategies](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-engine-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

## All Sufficient Steps

Meaning ▴ All Sufficient Steps denotes a design principle and operational mandate within a system where every component or process is engineered to autonomously achieve its defined objective without requiring external intervention or additional inputs beyond its initial parameters. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/execution-quality/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A multi-faceted crystalline structure, featuring sharp angles and translucent blue and clear elements, rests on a metallic base. This embodies Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives and precise RFQ protocols, enabling High-Fidelity Execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-market-microstructure.jpg)

## Execution Quality

Meaning ▴ Execution Quality quantifies the efficacy of an order's fill, assessing how closely the achieved trade price aligns with the prevailing market price at submission, alongside consideration for speed, cost, and market impact. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/liquidity-providers/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Sleek metallic components with teal luminescence precisely intersect, symbolizing an institutional-grade Prime RFQ. This represents multi-leg spread execution for digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols, ensuring high-fidelity execution, optimal price discovery, and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-best-execution-system.jpg)

## Liquidity Providers

Meaning ▴ Liquidity Providers are market participants, typically institutional entities or sophisticated trading firms, that facilitate efficient market operations by continuously quoting bid and offer prices for financial instruments. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/best-execution/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A central hub with a teal ring represents a Principal's Operational Framework. Interconnected spherical execution nodes symbolize precise Algorithmic Execution and Liquidity Aggregation via RFQ Protocol](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-prime-os-price-liquidity-alpha.jpg)

## Best Execution

Meaning ▴ Best Execution is the obligation to obtain the most favorable terms reasonably available for a client's order. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/market-conditions/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precisely engineered system features layered grey and beige plates, representing distinct liquidity pools or market segments, connected by a central dark blue RFQ protocol hub. Transparent teal bars, symbolizing multi-leg options spreads or algorithmic trading pathways, intersect through this core, facilitating price discovery and high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives via an institutional-grade Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-facilitating-high-fidelity-multi-leg-options-spread-execution-best-price-discovery-and-latent-liquidity-access-for-prime-brokerage.jpg)

## Market Conditions

Meaning ▴ Market Conditions denote the aggregate state of variables influencing trading dynamics within a given asset class, encompassing quantifiable metrics such as prevailing liquidity levels, volatility profiles, order book depth, bid-ask spreads, and the directional pressure of order flow. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/sufficient-steps/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Textured institutional-grade platform presents RFQ inquiry disk amidst liquidity fragmentation. Singular price discovery point floats](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-microstructure-prime-os-best-execution.jpg)

## Sufficient Steps

Meaning ▴ Sufficient Steps constitute the minimum, verifiable sequence of operations required to achieve a defined, deterministic outcome within a financial protocol or system, ensuring operational closure and state transition. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfq-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A dynamically balanced stack of multiple, distinct digital devices, signifying layered RFQ protocols and diverse liquidity pools. Each unit represents a unique private quotation within an aggregated inquiry system, facilitating price discovery and high-fidelity execution for institutional-grade digital asset derivatives via an advanced Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/dynamic-rfq-protocol-stacks-powering-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-liquidity-aggregation-and-best-execution.jpg)

## Rfq Process

Meaning ▴ The RFQ Process, or Request for Quote Process, is a formalized electronic protocol utilized by institutional participants to solicit executable price quotations for a specific financial instrument and quantity from a select group of liquidity providers. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/counterparty-selection/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A modular, institutional-grade device with a central data aggregation interface and metallic spigot. This Prime RFQ represents a robust RFQ protocol engine, enabling high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives, optimizing capital efficiency and best execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/principals-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-for-optimized-rfq-protocol-best-execution-system.jpg)

## Counterparty Selection

Meaning ▴ Counterparty selection refers to the systematic process of identifying, evaluating, and engaging specific entities for trade execution, risk transfer, or service provision, based on predefined criteria such as creditworthiness, liquidity provision, operational reliability, and pricing competitiveness within a digital asset derivatives ecosystem. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/does-the-underlying-assets-liquidity-profile-determine-the-optimal-execution-protocol/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A complex metallic mechanism features a central circular component with intricate blue circuitry and a dark orb. This symbolizes the Prime RFQ intelligence layer, driving institutional RFQ protocols for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-core-rfq-engine-for-digital-asset-derivatives-best-trade-execution.jpg)

## Liquidity Profile

An asset's liquidity profile is the primary determinant, dictating the strategic balance between market impact and timing risk. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/order-size/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A glossy, segmented sphere with a luminous blue 'X' core represents a Principal's Prime RFQ. It highlights multi-dealer RFQ protocols, high-fidelity execution, and atomic settlement for institutional digital asset derivatives, signifying unified liquidity pools, market microstructure, and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/prime-os-core-for-best-rfq-digital-asset-derivatives-institutional-trade-flow.jpg)

## Order Size

Meaning ▴ The specified quantity of a particular digital asset or derivative contract intended for a single transactional instruction submitted to a trading venue or liquidity provider. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfq-workflow/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A proprietary Prime RFQ platform featuring extending blue/teal components, representing a multi-leg options strategy or complex RFQ spread. The labeled band 'F331 46 1' denotes a specific strike price or option series within an aggregated inquiry for high-fidelity execution, showcasing granular market microstructure data points](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-protocol-1.jpg)

## Rfq Workflow

Meaning ▴ The RFQ Workflow defines a structured, programmatic process for a principal to solicit actionable price quotations from a pre-defined set of liquidity providers for a specific financial instrument and notional quantity. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/transaction-cost-analysis/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A stylized spherical system, symbolizing an institutional digital asset derivative, rests on a robust Prime RFQ base. Its dark core represents a deep liquidity pool for algorithmic trading](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-grade-rfq-protocol-engine-facilitating-best-execution-and-liquidity-aggregation-for-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

## Transaction Cost Analysis

Meaning ▴ Transaction Cost Analysis (TCA) is the quantitative methodology for assessing the explicit and implicit costs incurred during the execution of financial trades. </a>

**Tags:** [MiFID II Best Execution](https://options.greeks.live/area/mifid-ii-best-execution/), [RFQ Process](https://options.greeks.live/area/rfq-process/), [Response Time](https://options.greeks.live/area/response-time/), [Order Execution Policy](https://options.greeks.live/area/order-execution-policy/), [Liquidity Providers](https://options.greeks.live/area/liquidity-providers/), [OTC Derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/area/otc-derivatives/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [How Can Firms Use Transaction Cost Analysis to Justify Their RFQ Counterparty Selection under MiFID II?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-firms-use-transaction-cost-analysis-to-justify-their-rfq-counterparty-selection-under-mifid-ii/)
![A sleek metallic teal execution engine, representing a Crypto Derivatives OS, interfaces with a luminous pre-trade analytics display. This abstract view depicts institutional RFQ protocols enabling high-fidelity execution for multi-leg spreads, optimizing market microstructure and atomic settlement.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/advanced-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-market-microstructure-analysis.jpg)

TCA provides the immutable, quantitative evidence required to justify RFQ counterparty selection, transforming regulatory duty into a strategic execution advantage.

- 
### [How Does MiFID II Define Best Execution for Illiquid OTC Derivatives?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-mifid-ii-define-best-execution-for-illiquid-otc-derivatives/)
![A stylized spherical system, symbolizing an institutional digital asset derivative, rests on a robust Prime RFQ base. Its dark core represents a deep liquidity pool for algorithmic trading. A blue band signifies high-fidelity execution protocols, ensuring optimal price discovery and capital efficiency within market microstructure, enhancing alpha generation.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-grade-rfq-protocol-engine-facilitating-best-execution-and-liquidity-aggregation-for-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

MiFID II requires firms to build an auditable system that proves all sufficient steps were taken to secure the best outcome for clients.

- 
### [How Has MiFID II Specifically Altered Best Execution Requirements for Fixed Income RFQs?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-has-mifid-ii-specifically-altered-best-execution-requirements-for-fixed-income-rfqs/)
![An intricate, transparent cylindrical system depicts a sophisticated RFQ protocol for digital asset derivatives. Internal glowing elements signify high-fidelity execution and algorithmic trading. A central angular structure represents atomic settlement and multi-leg spread capabilities, ensuring best execution within institutional trading.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-protocol-architecture.jpg)

MiFID II transformed fixed income RFQ best execution from a qualitative duty into a quantitatively provable, data-driven process.

- 
### [In What Ways Do Best Execution Obligations Differ for Retail versus Professional Clients?](https://options.greeks.live/question/in-what-ways-do-best-execution-obligations-differ-for-retail-versus-professional-clients/)
![Reflective and translucent discs overlap, symbolizing an RFQ protocol bridging market microstructure with institutional digital asset derivatives. This depicts seamless price discovery and high-fidelity execution, accessing latent liquidity for optimal atomic settlement within a Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-best-price-discovery.jpg)

Best execution obligations diverge from a protective, cost-focused mandate for retail clients to a flexible, factor-based framework for professionals.

- 
### [What Are the Regulatory Requirements for Best Execution When Using RFQ Protocols?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-regulatory-requirements-for-best-execution-when-using-rfq-protocols/)
![A sophisticated mechanism features a segmented disc, indicating dynamic market microstructure and liquidity pool partitioning. This system visually represents an RFQ protocol's price discovery process, crucial for high-fidelity execution of institutional digital asset derivatives and managing counterparty risk within a Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/advanced-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-liquidity-aggregation-system.jpg)

Regulatory best execution for RFQs requires a systematic, data-driven process to prove diligent sourcing of the most favorable client outcome.

- 
### [How Do MiFID II Best Execution Requirements Specifically Impact RFQ Workflows?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-mifid-ii-best-execution-requirements-specifically-impact-rfq-workflows/)
![A dual-toned cylindrical component features a central transparent aperture revealing intricate metallic wiring. This signifies a core RFQ processing unit for Digital Asset Derivatives, enabling rapid Price Discovery and High-Fidelity Execution. It embodies an advanced Prime RFQ component, optimizing Liquidity Pool access and Market Microstructure via Algorithmic Trading.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-core-best-execution-prime-os.jpg)

MiFID II transforms RFQ workflows from simple price-seeking inquiries into auditable, data-driven processes proving best execution.

- 
### [How Do Regulatory Frameworks like MiFID II Influence the Strategy for Managing RFQ Information Leakage?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-regulatory-frameworks-like-mifid-ii-influence-the-strategy-for-managing-rfq-information-leakage/)
![Stacked, distinct components, subtly tilted, symbolize the multi-tiered institutional digital asset derivatives architecture. Layers represent RFQ protocols, private quotation aggregation, core liquidity pools, and atomic settlement. This design optimizes market microstructure for high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/layered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-optimizing-principal-execution-management-systems-for-best-execution.jpg)

MiFID II transforms RFQ information leakage management from a relational art into a data-driven science of systematic risk control.

- 
### [How Does MiFID II Redefine the Best Execution Standard for Asset Managers?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-mifid-ii-redefine-the-best-execution-standard-for-asset-managers/)
![A modular, institutional-grade device with a central data aggregation interface and metallic spigot. This Prime RFQ represents a robust RFQ protocol engine, enabling high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives, optimizing capital efficiency and best execution.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/principals-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-for-optimized-rfq-protocol-best-execution-system.jpg)

MiFID II redefines best execution by mandating asset managers to prove, with data, that they took all sufficient steps for the best outcome.

- 
### [From a Regulatory Standpoint What Are the Key Best Execution Considerations When Utilizing RFQ Protocols?](https://options.greeks.live/question/from-a-regulatory-standpoint-what-are-the-key-best-execution-considerations-when-utilizing-rfq-protocols/)
![Two high-gloss, white cylindrical execution channels with dark, circular apertures and secure bolted flanges, representing robust institutional-grade infrastructure for digital asset derivatives. These conduits facilitate precise RFQ protocols, ensuring optimal liquidity aggregation and high-fidelity execution within a proprietary Prime RFQ environment.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-grade-execution-channels-enabling-private-quotation-and-optimal-liquidity-aggregation-for-high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-on-prime-os.jpg)

A compliant RFQ protocol is a data-driven system designed to prove a private auction yields the best public outcome.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "How Many Quotes Are Considered &#8216;Sufficient&#8217; to Demonstrate Best Execution in an RFQ Process under MiFID II?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-many-quotes-are-considered-sufficient-to-demonstrate-best-execution-in-an-rfq-process-under-mifid-ii/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-many-quotes-are-considered-sufficient-to-demonstrate-best-execution-in-an-rfq-process-under-mifid-ii/"
    },
    "headline": "How Many Quotes Are Considered 'Sufficient' to Demonstrate Best Execution in an RFQ Process under MiFID II? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "MiFID II demands a defensible process, not a specific number of quotes, to prove best execution. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-many-quotes-are-considered-sufficient-to-demonstrate-best-execution-in-an-rfq-process-under-mifid-ii/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-07T21:01:37+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-08-07T21:01:45+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-system-execution-hub.jpg",
        "caption": "A beige probe precisely connects to a dark blue metallic port, representing a critical interface for institutional Digital Asset Derivatives trading. This robust connection facilitates high-fidelity execution of complex multi-leg spreads via an optimized RFQ protocol, ensuring best execution and minimal slippage. Alphanumeric identifiers denote specific portfolio margin parameters and granular market microstructure insights. Powered by a Prime RFQ intelligence layer, this enables seamless atomic settlement and pre-trade analytics for superior alpha generation."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "All Sufficient Steps",
        "Best Execution",
        "Counterparty Selection",
        "Defensible Audit Trail",
        "Execution Quality",
        "Liquidity Provider Tiering",
        "Liquidity Providers",
        "Market Conditions",
        "Market Microstructure",
        "MiFID II Best Execution",
        "Order Execution Policy",
        "Order Size",
        "OTC Derivatives",
        "Price Fairness",
        "Regulatory Compliance",
        "Request for Quote Process",
        "Response Time",
        "RFQ Process",
        "RFQ Workflow",
        "Sufficient Steps",
        "Transaction Cost Analysis"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/how-many-quotes-are-considered-sufficient-to-demonstrate-best-execution-in-an-rfq-process-under-mifid-ii/
