# How Should an Organization Adjust Its RFP Scoring Criteria for Services versus Technology Procurements? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-08
**Categories:** Question

---

![Sleek metallic panels expose a circuit board, its glowing blue-green traces symbolizing dynamic market microstructure and intelligence layer data flow. A silver stylus embodies a Principal's precise interaction with a Crypto Derivatives OS, enabling high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-microstructure-os.jpg)

![A bifurcated sphere, symbolizing institutional digital asset derivatives, reveals a luminous turquoise core. This signifies a secure RFQ protocol for high-fidelity execution and private quotation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-orchestration.jpg)

## Concept

An organization’s approach to procurement reveals its operational DNA. The way it evaluates potential partners, whether for a tangible technology asset or an ongoing service, is a direct reflection of its strategic priorities. When constructing a Request for Proposal (RFP), the [scoring criteria](https://prime.greeks.live/area/scoring-criteria/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) are the very heart of this strategic expression.

The distinction between procuring a technology platform and securing a service provider is fundamental, and this distinction must be deeply embedded in the evaluation framework. A failure to adjust scoring criteria between these two domains leads to misaligned partnerships, budget overruns, and a fundamental disconnect between procurement activities and business objectives.

The procurement of technology is often centered on the acquisition of a product. The evaluation, therefore, is heavily weighted towards the technical specifications, capabilities, and future-proofing of the asset. The core of the analysis is the product itself ▴ its features, its integration capabilities, its security protocols, and its scalability.

The vendor is a critical component, but the primary focus remains on the technology’s ability to perform a set of defined functions. The organization is, in essence, buying a tool.

Conversely, the procurement of services is the acquisition of a relationship. The evaluation must extend beyond a checklist of deliverables to an assessment of the provider’s expertise, their methodology, and their cultural fit with the organization. Here, the ‘what’ is inextricably linked to the ‘how’. The focus shifts from the product to the people, the processes, and the partnership.

The organization is not just buying a set of outcomes; it is investing in a collaborative engine to achieve those outcomes. This fundamental difference in the nature of the acquisition necessitates a corresponding shift in the architecture of the [RFP scoring](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-scoring/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) criteria.

![A refined object, dark blue and beige, symbolizes an institutional-grade RFQ platform. Its metallic base with a central sensor embodies the Prime RFQ Intelligence Layer, enabling High-Fidelity Execution, Price Discovery, and efficient Liquidity Pool access for Digital Asset Derivatives within Market Microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/prime-os-rfq-protocols-for-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

![A polished metallic modular hub with four radiating arms represents an advanced RFQ execution engine. This system aggregates multi-venue liquidity for institutional digital asset derivatives, enabling high-fidelity execution and precise price discovery across diverse counterparty risk profiles, powered by a sophisticated intelligence layer](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/principal-rfq-hub-digital-asset-derivatives-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## Strategy

![A sophisticated metallic instrument, a precision gauge, indicates a calibrated reading, essential for RFQ protocol execution. Its intricate scales symbolize price discovery and high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-platform.jpg)

## Differentiating the Core Logic of Evaluation

The strategic differentiation in RFP scoring for technology versus services begins with a clear understanding of where value is derived in each procurement type. For technology, value is concentrated in the asset’s performance and its ability to integrate into the existing operational framework. For services, value is realized through the provider’s performance and their ability to adapt and respond to the organization’s evolving needs.

This distinction must be the guiding principle for assigning weights to the [evaluation criteria](https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-criteria/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). A generic, one-size-fits-all scoring model will invariably fail to capture the nuances of these two distinct procurement streams.

The weighting of scoring criteria is the mechanism by which an organization signals its priorities to potential vendors. In a technology RFP, a significant portion of the total score, often exceeding 50%, should be allocated to technical criteria. This includes the solution’s architecture, its security features, its scalability, and its interoperability with existing systems. The emphasis is on the product’s inherent capabilities.

In a services RFP, the weighting shifts towards the provider’s qualifications, their proposed methodology, and their track record. These elements, which speak to the provider’s ability to deliver, should command the highest percentage of the score.

> The art of effective procurement lies in tailoring the evaluation to the unique value proposition of what is being acquired.

The following table illustrates a strategic framework for adjusting scoring criteria between technology and [services procurements](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-should-an-organization-adapt-its-rfp-weighting-strategy-for-services-versus-technology-procurements/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). The weights are indicative and should be adjusted based on the specific needs of the project.

### Table 1 ▴ Comparative RFP Scoring Criteria Framework

| Evaluation Criterion | Typical Weighting for Technology Procurement | Typical Weighting for Services Procurement | Rationale for Adjustment |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Technical Solution | 40-50% | 20-30% | For technology, the solution’s features and architecture are paramount. For services, the ‘solution’ is the provider’s methodology, which is evaluated separately. |
| Vendor Qualifications & Experience | 15-25% | 30-40% | In services procurement, the provider’s team, their experience, and their reputation are the core of the offering. |
| Cost & Pricing Structure | 20-30% | 20-30% | Cost is a significant factor in both, but the structure of the cost (e.g. one-time license vs. recurring retainer) will differ. |
| Implementation & Support | 10-15% | 15-25% | For services, the ongoing support and relationship management are a larger component of the overall value. |
| Security & Compliance | 10-15% | 5-10% | While important for both, technology procurement often involves a deeper dive into the product’s security architecture and data handling protocols. |

![An intricate, high-precision mechanism symbolizes an Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives RFQ protocol. Its sleek off-white casing protects the core market microstructure, while the teal-edged component signifies high-fidelity execution and optimal price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-market-microstructure-optimization.jpg)

## The Nuances of Qualitative Assessment

Beyond the quantitative weighting of criteria, the nature of the questions asked in the RFP must also be adjusted. For technology procurements, questions should be precise and focused on verifiable specifications. For example, instead of asking “Is the platform secure?”, a more effective question would be “Does the platform comply with ISO 27001 and provide detailed audit logs for all user actions?”.

For services procurements, questions should be more open-ended, designed to elicit responses that reveal the provider’s approach, their problem-solving skills, and their understanding of the organization’s business. For example, instead of asking “Do you have experience in our industry?”, a better question would be “Describe a complex challenge you have solved for a client in our industry and the methodology you employed.”

- 
**Technology-focused questions** often revolve around features, specifications, and performance metrics. They are designed to be answered with data and evidence.

- 
**Service-focused questions** explore methodology, experience, and cultural fit. They are designed to be answered with case studies, testimonials, and detailed process descriptions.

![A multi-layered, circular device with a central concentric lens. It symbolizes an RFQ engine for precision price discovery and high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-for-precision-execution.jpg)

![Two spheres balance on a fragmented structure against split dark and light backgrounds. This models institutional digital asset derivatives RFQ protocols, depicting market microstructure, price discovery, and liquidity aggregation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-price-discovery-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## Execution

![A sophisticated digital asset derivatives RFQ engine's core components are depicted, showcasing precise market microstructure for optimal price discovery. Its central hub facilitates algorithmic trading, ensuring high-fidelity execution across multi-leg spreads](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimizing-multi-leg-spreads-for-optimal-capital-efficiency.jpg)

## A Granular Look at Scoring Models

The execution of a differentiated RFP scoring strategy requires a granular approach to building the scoring model. A simple weighted average is a good starting point, but a more sophisticated model will provide a more nuanced and defensible evaluation. A multi-stage [evaluation process](https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) can be particularly effective, with each stage acting as a filter to narrow the field of potential vendors.

For a [technology procurement](https://prime.greeks.live/area/technology-procurement/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), a multi-stage evaluation might look like this:

- 
**Stage 1 ▴ Mandatory Technical Requirements (Pass/Fail)**. This stage ensures that all proposals meet the baseline technical specifications. Any vendor that does not pass this stage is eliminated from further consideration.

- 
**Stage 2 ▴ [Weighted Scoring](https://prime.greeks.live/area/weighted-scoring/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) of Technical and Functional Criteria**. This stage involves a detailed evaluation of the [technical solution](https://prime.greeks.live/area/technical-solution/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), with scores assigned to each feature and capability.

- 
**Stage 3 ▴ Vendor Demonstrations and Proof of Concept**. The top-scoring vendors from Stage 2 are invited to demonstrate their solutions and participate in a proof-of-concept exercise.

- 
**Stage 4 ▴ Cost and Contract Negotiation**. The final stage focuses on the financial aspects of the proposal and the negotiation of contract terms.

For a [services procurement](https://prime.greeks.live/area/services-procurement/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), the multi-stage evaluation would be structured differently:

- 
**Stage 1 ▴ [Vendor Qualifications](https://prime.greeks.live/area/vendor-qualifications/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) and Experience (Pass/Fail)**. This stage ensures that all bidding firms have the requisite experience and a proven track record in the relevant service area.

- 
**Stage 2 ▴ Weighted Scoring of Proposed Methodology and Team**. This stage focuses on the ‘how’ of the service delivery, evaluating the proposed approach, the project plan, and the qualifications of the key personnel assigned to the project.

- 
**Stage 3 ▴ Client References and Case Studies**. A deep dive into the vendor’s past performance, including detailed conversations with their current and former clients.

- 
**Stage 4 ▴ Cost and [Service Level Agreement](https://prime.greeks.live/area/service-level-agreement/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (SLA) Negotiation**. The final stage addresses the pricing structure and the specific commitments of the service provider.

> A well-structured evaluation process removes subjectivity and provides a clear, data-driven basis for decision-making.

The following table provides a detailed breakdown of potential scoring criteria and sub-criteria for both technology and services procurements. This level of detail is essential for building a robust and effective evaluation model.

### Table 2 ▴ Detailed RFP Scoring Sub-Criteria

| Primary Criterion | Technology Procurement Sub-Criteria | Services Procurement Sub-Criteria |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Technical Solution / Methodology | – Core Functionality & Features – Scalability & Performance – Integration Capabilities – User Interface & Experience (UI/UX) – Customization Options | – Project Management Approach – Communication & Reporting Plan – Quality Assurance Processes – Risk Mitigation Strategies – Innovation & Continuous Improvement |
| Vendor Qualifications & Experience | – Company Financial Stability – Years in Business & Market Position – Product Development Roadmap – Customer Support Infrastructure – Industry-Specific Certifications | – Experience of Key Personnel – Relevant Project Case Studies – Client Testimonials & References – Industry Awards & Recognition – Employee Training & Development |
| Cost & Pricing Structure | – Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) – Licensing & Subscription Fees – Implementation & Training Costs – Maintenance & Support Costs – Payment Terms & Flexibility | – Hourly Rates or Retainer Fees – Project-Based or Milestone Pricing – Expense & Travel Policies – Change Order & Scope Creep Clauses – Invoicing & Payment Schedule |

![An abstract institutional-grade RFQ protocol market microstructure visualization. Distinct execution streams intersect on a capital efficiency pivot, symbolizing block trade price discovery within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-optimized-microstructure.jpg)

## The Human Element in Evaluation

While a structured scoring model is essential, the human element in the evaluation process cannot be overlooked. The composition of the evaluation committee is critical. For technology procurements, the committee should be heavily weighted with IT professionals, security experts, and end-users who will interact with the system daily. For services procurements, the committee should include representatives from the business units that will be the primary recipients of the service, as well as stakeholders from finance and legal.

It is also important to provide clear guidance to the evaluation committee on how to apply the scoring criteria. An evaluation guide that defines each criterion and provides examples of what a ‘good’ response looks like can help to ensure consistency and fairness in the scoring process. Regular check-in meetings with the committee can also help to identify and address any discrepancies or misunderstandings in the evaluation process.

![Central mechanical pivot with a green linear element diagonally traversing, depicting a robust RFQ protocol engine for institutional digital asset derivatives. This signifies high-fidelity execution of aggregated inquiry and price discovery, ensuring capital efficiency within complex market microstructure and order book dynamics](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-best-execution.jpg)

## References

- Overvest, Marijn. “12 RFP Evaluation Criteria to Consider in 2025.” Procurement Tactics, 2025.

- Cannon, Chris. “RFP Best Practices ▴ A Strategic Approach to Tech Procurement.” Bridgepointe Technologies, March 6, 2025.

- Symms, RD. “A Guide to RFP Evaluation Criteria ▴ Basics, Tips, and Examples.” Responsive, January 14, 2021.

- “How to do RFP scoring ▴ Step-by-step Guide.” Prokuria, June 12, 2025.

- “RFP Evaluation Criteria ▴ Everything You Need to Know.” Euna Solutions.

![A polished, cut-open sphere reveals a sharp, luminous green prism, symbolizing high-fidelity execution within a Principal's operational framework. The reflective interior denotes market microstructure insights and latent liquidity in digital asset derivatives, embodying RFQ protocols for alpha generation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-engine-prime-os-alpha-intelligence.jpg)

## Reflection

The [distinction between procuring technology](https://prime.greeks.live/question/can-a-hybrid-rfq-rfp-model-be-implemented-for-procuring-complex-financial-technology-solutions/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) and services is a critical one, and it requires a fundamental shift in an organization’s evaluation mindset. The frameworks and models discussed here provide a structured approach to this challenge, but they are not a substitute for strategic thinking. The ultimate success of any [procurement process](https://prime.greeks.live/area/procurement-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) depends on the organization’s ability to clearly define its needs, to ask the right questions, and to create a fair and transparent process for evaluating potential partners.

The RFP is more than just a document; it is a reflection of the organization’s strategic intent. By thoughtfully adjusting the scoring criteria for technology versus services, an organization can ensure that its procurement decisions are not just transactions, but true strategic investments in its future.

![A dark blue sphere, representing a deep institutional liquidity pool, integrates a central RFQ engine. This system processes aggregated inquiries for Digital Asset Derivatives, including Bitcoin Options and Ethereum Futures, enabling high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-for-optimized-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/scoring-criteria/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![An institutional-grade platform's RFQ protocol interface, with a price discovery engine and precision guides, enables high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives. Integrated controls optimize market microstructure and liquidity aggregation within a Principal's operational framework](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/proprietary-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-facilitating-high-fidelity-execution-and-granular-market-microstructure-analysis-for-prime-os.jpg)

## Scoring Criteria

Meaning ▴ Scoring Criteria represent the pre-defined, measurable metrics and thresholds utilized to quantitatively assess the performance, quality, or compliance of a system, process, or counterparty within the institutional digital asset derivatives trading ecosystem. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-scoring/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek device showcases a rotating translucent teal disc, symbolizing dynamic price discovery and volatility surface visualization within an RFQ protocol. Its numerical display suggests a quantitative pricing engine facilitating algorithmic execution for digital asset derivatives, optimizing market microstructure through an intelligence layer](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-for-digital-asset-rfq-execution-system-with-smart-liquidity-routing.jpg)

## Rfp Scoring

Meaning ▴ RFP Scoring defines the structured, quantitative methodology employed to evaluate and rank vendor proposals received in response to a Request for Proposal, particularly for complex technology and service procurements within institutional digital asset derivatives. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-criteria/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A spherical, eye-like structure, an Institutional Prime RFQ, projects a sharp, focused beam. This visualizes high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols for digital asset derivatives, enabling block trades and multi-leg spreads with capital efficiency and best execution across market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-prime-os-rfq-protocol-digital-asset-derivatives-block-trade-execution.jpg)

## Evaluation Criteria

Meaning ▴ Evaluation Criteria define the quantifiable metrics and qualitative standards against which the performance, compliance, or risk profile of a system, strategy, or transaction is rigorously assessed. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-should-an-organization-adapt-its-rfp-weighting-strategy-for-services-versus-technology-procurements/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A balanced blue semi-sphere rests on a horizontal bar, poised above diagonal rails, reflecting its form below. This symbolizes the precise atomic settlement of a block trade within an RFQ protocol, showcasing high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency in institutional digital asset derivatives markets, managed by a Prime RFQ with minimal slippage](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-6.jpg)

## Services Procurements

Adapt RFP weighting by prioritizing measurable TCO and technical fit for technology, and team expertise and methodology for services. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precision-engineered metallic component displays two interlocking gold modules with circular execution apertures, anchored by a central pivot. This symbolizes an institutional-grade digital asset derivatives platform, enabling high-fidelity RFQ execution, optimized multi-leg spread management, and robust prime brokerage liquidity](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-core-for-institutional-trade-flow.jpg)

## Evaluation Process

Meaning ▴ The Evaluation Process constitutes a systematic, data-driven methodology for assessing performance, risk exposure, and operational compliance within a financial system, particularly concerning institutional digital asset derivatives. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/technology-procurement/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![An abstract, multi-component digital infrastructure with a central lens and circuit patterns, embodying an Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives platform. This Prime RFQ enables High-Fidelity Execution via RFQ Protocol, optimizing Market Microstructure for Algorithmic Trading, Price Discovery, and Multi-Leg Spread](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-grade-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-platform-powering-high-fidelity-execution-via-advanced-rfq-protocol-prime-os-intelligence-layer.jpg)

## Technology Procurement

Meaning ▴ Technology Procurement defines the methodical acquisition of specialized hardware, software platforms, and associated services essential for establishing, maintaining, and enhancing an institution's capabilities in digital asset trading, risk management, and post-trade processing. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/technical-solution/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A reflective surface supports a sharp metallic element, stabilized by a sphere, alongside translucent teal prisms. This abstractly represents institutional-grade digital asset derivatives RFQ protocol price discovery within a Prime RFQ, emphasizing high-fidelity execution and liquidity pool optimization](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-prime-os-microstructure-optimization.jpg)

## Technical Solution

Meaning ▴ A Technical Solution represents a rigorously engineered framework or a modular computational mechanism designed to address a specific operational or market microstructure challenge within the complex landscape of institutional digital asset derivatives. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/weighted-scoring/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![An abstract system depicts an institutional-grade digital asset derivatives platform. Interwoven metallic conduits symbolize low-latency RFQ execution pathways, facilitating efficient block trade routing](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-rfq-execution-engine.jpg)

## Weighted Scoring

Meaning ▴ Weighted Scoring defines a computational methodology where multiple input variables are assigned distinct coefficients or weights, reflecting their relative importance, before being aggregated into a single, composite metric. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/services-procurement/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A large, smooth sphere, a textured metallic sphere, and a smaller, swirling sphere rest on an angular, dark, reflective surface. This visualizes a principal liquidity pool, complex structured product, and dynamic volatility surface, representing high-fidelity execution within an institutional digital asset derivatives market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-optimized-market-microstructure-precision.jpg)

## Services Procurement

Meaning ▴ Services Procurement defines the systematic acquisition of external, specialized capabilities and operational support critical for the robust functioning and strategic advancement of institutional digital asset derivative platforms. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/vendor-qualifications/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Modular institutional-grade execution system components reveal luminous green data pathways, symbolizing high-fidelity cross-asset connectivity. This depicts intricate market microstructure facilitating RFQ protocol integration for atomic settlement of digital asset derivatives within a Principal's operational framework, underpinned by a Prime RFQ intelligence layer](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/modular-high-fidelity-execution-architecture-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-integration-and-principals-operational-framework-optimization.jpg)

## Vendor Qualifications

Meaning ▴ Vendor Qualifications represent the rigorous, systematic process of evaluating and validating external service providers and technology partners based on their operational, technical, financial, and security capabilities to meet an institution's specific requirements and risk appetite. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/service-level-agreement/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, futuristic institutional grade platform with a translucent teal dome signifies a secure environment for private quotation and high-fidelity execution. A dark, reflective sphere represents an intelligence layer for algorithmic trading and price discovery within market microstructure, ensuring capital efficiency for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-rfq-execution-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-1.jpg)

## Service Level Agreement

Meaning ▴ A Service Level Agreement (SLA) constitutes a formal, bilateral contract specifying the quantifiable performance parameters and quality metrics that a service provider commits to deliver for a client, foundational for establishing clear operational expectations within the high-stakes environment of institutional digital asset derivatives. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/can-a-hybrid-rfq-rfp-model-be-implemented-for-procuring-complex-financial-technology-solutions/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Two sleek, abstract forms, one dark, one light, are precisely stacked, symbolizing a multi-layered institutional trading system. This embodies sophisticated RFQ protocols, high-fidelity execution, and optimal liquidity aggregation for digital asset derivatives, ensuring robust market microstructure and capital efficiency within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-digital-asset-derivatives-platform-architecture-high-fidelity-execution-protocols-and-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## Distinction between Procuring Technology

A hybrid RFQ-RFP model de-risks complex financial technology procurement through a phased evaluation of both solution quality and total cost of ownership. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/procurement-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A crystalline geometric structure, symbolizing precise price discovery and high-fidelity execution, rests upon an intricate market microstructure framework. This visual metaphor illustrates the Prime RFQ facilitating institutional digital asset derivatives trading, including Bitcoin options and Ethereum futures, through RFQ protocols for block trades with minimal slippage](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Procurement Process

Meaning ▴ The Procurement Process defines a formalized methodology for acquiring necessary resources, such as liquidity, derivatives products, or technology infrastructure, within a controlled, auditable framework specifically tailored for institutional digital asset operations. </a>

**Tags:** [Procurement Process](https://options.greeks.live/area/procurement-process/), [Technical Solution](https://options.greeks.live/area/technical-solution/), [Scoring Criteria](https://options.greeks.live/area/scoring-criteria/), [Service Level Agreement](https://options.greeks.live/area/service-level-agreement/), [Procurement Strategy](https://options.greeks.live/area/procurement-strategy/), [RFP Evaluation Criteria](https://options.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation-criteria/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [What Is the Optimal Weight to Assign to Cultural Fit in an Rfp Scoring Model?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-optimal-weight-to-assign-to-cultural-fit-in-an-rfp-scoring-model/)
![A curved grey surface anchors a translucent blue disk, pierced by a sharp green financial instrument and two silver stylus elements. This visualizes a precise RFQ protocol for institutional digital asset derivatives, enabling liquidity aggregation, high-fidelity execution, price discovery, and algorithmic trading within market microstructure via a Principal's operational framework.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-high-fidelity-execution-via-rfq-protocols-optimizing-market-microstructure-and-price-discovery.jpg)

The optimal weight for cultural fit in an RFP model is a variable, strategically set between 5% and 35% based on project complexity.

- 
### [How Can an Organization Effectively Weight RFP Evaluation Criteria to Reflect Its Strategic Priorities?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-effectively-weight-rfp-evaluation-criteria-to-reflect-its-strategic-priorities/)
![Central polished disc, with contrasting segments, represents Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives Prime RFQ core. A textured rod signifies RFQ Protocol High-Fidelity Execution and Low Latency Market Microstructure data flow to the Quantitative Analysis Engine for Price Discovery.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-core-system-high-fidelity.jpg)

Weighting RFP criteria is the systemic translation of strategic intent into a quantitative, defensible procurement decision framework.

- 
### [What Is the Best Way to Develop and Weight Scoring Criteria for an Rfp Evaluation?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-best-way-to-develop-and-weight-scoring-criteria-for-an-rfp-evaluation/)
![A futuristic system component with a split design and intricate central element, embodying advanced RFQ protocols. This visualizes high-fidelity execution, precise price discovery, and granular market microstructure control for institutional digital asset derivatives, optimizing liquidity provision and minimizing slippage.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/advanced-rfq-protocols-for-digital-asset-derivatives-price-discovery.jpg)

Developing and weighting RFP scoring criteria is a systematic process of translating strategic goals into a quantitative, defensible decision framework.

- 
### [How Can an Organization Determine the Optimal Balance between Price and Quality in an Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-determine-the-optimal-balance-between-price-and-quality-in-an-rfp/)
![A sleek, spherical, off-white device with a glowing cyan lens symbolizes an Institutional Grade Prime RFQ Intelligence Layer. It drives High-Fidelity Execution of Digital Asset Derivatives via RFQ Protocols, enabling Optimal Liquidity Aggregation and Price Discovery for Market Microstructure Analysis.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimal-execution-1.jpg)

An organization determines the optimal price-quality balance by architecting an evaluation system that quantifies quality and models total value.

- 
### [What Is the Most Effective Way to Assign Weights to Different Rfp Evaluation Criteria?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-most-effective-way-to-assign-weights-to-different-rfp-evaluation-criteria/)
![A translucent blue sphere is precisely centered within beige, dark, and teal channels. This depicts RFQ protocol for digital asset derivatives, enabling high-fidelity execution of a block trade within a controlled market microstructure, ensuring atomic settlement and price discovery on a Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-execution-pathway-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-leveraging-rfq-protocols-and-high-fidelity-market-microstructure.jpg)

The most effective way to assign weights to RFP criteria is to use a structured, collaborative process that translates strategic goals into a quantitative, defensible evaluation model.

- 
### [What Is the Optimal Structure for an Rfp Scoring Matrix to Ensure Both Clarity and Granularity in the Evaluation?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-optimal-structure-for-an-rfp-scoring-matrix-to-ensure-both-clarity-and-granularity-in-the-evaluation/)
![Precision-engineered beige and teal conduits intersect against a dark void, symbolizing a Prime RFQ protocol interface. Transparent structural elements suggest multi-leg spread connectivity and high-fidelity execution pathways for institutional digital asset derivatives. This visual emphasizes atomic settlement, capital efficiency, and market microstructure dynamics for price discovery.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/insti-grade-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-multi-leg-execution-junction.jpg)

An optimal RFP scoring matrix is a weighted, multi-criteria decision model that quantifies vendor alignment with strategic goals.

- 
### [How Do You Properly Weight Rfp Evaluation Criteria to Reflect Strategic Priorities?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-properly-weight-rfp-evaluation-criteria-to-reflect-strategic-priorities/)
![A transparent, multi-faceted component, indicative of an RFQ engine's intricate market microstructure logic, emerges from complex FIX Protocol connectivity. Its sharp edges signify high-fidelity execution and price discovery precision for institutional digital asset derivatives. This Prime RFQ module optimizes algorithmic trading and capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimized-for-best-execution.jpg)

Weighting RFP criteria translates strategic priorities into a quantitative decision engine for defensible vendor selection.

- 
### [How Can a Weighted Scoring Matrix Be Effectively Used to Evaluate Vendor Proposals in a Hybrid Procurement Process?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-a-weighted-scoring-matrix-be-effectively-used-to-evaluate-vendor-proposals-in-a-hybrid-procurement-process/)
![Two dark, circular, precision-engineered components, stacked and reflecting, symbolize a Principal's Operational Framework. This layered architecture facilitates High-Fidelity Execution for Block Trades via RFQ Protocols, ensuring Atomic Settlement and Capital Efficiency within Market Microstructure for Digital Asset Derivatives.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-execution-protocol.jpg)

A weighted scoring matrix translates strategic priorities into a quantitative, defensible vendor selection framework.

- 
### [When Is a Price-Focused Rfp Evaluation Model the More Appropriate Strategic Choice?](https://options.greeks.live/question/when-is-a-price-focused-rfp-evaluation-model-the-more-appropriate-strategic-choice/)
![A segmented rod traverses a multi-layered spherical structure, depicting a streamlined Institutional RFQ Protocol. This visual metaphor illustrates optimal Digital Asset Derivatives price discovery, high-fidelity execution, and robust liquidity pool integration, minimizing slippage and ensuring atomic settlement for multi-leg spreads within a Prime RFQ.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-flow-1.jpg)

A price-focused RFP is the optimal choice when procuring a commoditized good or service with rigorously defined specifications.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "How Should an Organization Adjust Its RFP Scoring Criteria for Services versus Technology Procurements?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-should-an-organization-adjust-its-rfp-scoring-criteria-for-services-versus-technology-procurements/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-should-an-organization-adjust-its-rfp-scoring-criteria-for-services-versus-technology-procurements/"
    },
    "headline": "How Should an Organization Adjust Its RFP Scoring Criteria for Services versus Technology Procurements? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "An organization must pivot its RFP scoring from product-centric metrics for technology to provider-centric metrics for services. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-should-an-organization-adjust-its-rfp-scoring-criteria-for-services-versus-technology-procurements/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-08T17:05:32+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-08-08T17:05:39+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-for-optimal-liquidity-aggregation-and-high-fidelity-execution.jpg",
        "caption": "An abstract composition of intersecting translucent planes and spherical nodes, representing the intricate architecture of an institutional-grade Crypto Derivatives OS. This visual metaphor illustrates advanced RFQ protocol dynamics for block trade execution, enabling seamless liquidity aggregation and optimized price discovery. It signifies robust portfolio margin management and precise delta hedging strategies, ensuring capital efficiency and minimizing slippage for sophisticated market makers navigating complex market microstructure with prime brokerage services."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Evaluation Criteria",
        "Evaluation Process",
        "Procurement Process",
        "Procurement Strategy",
        "RFP Best Practices",
        "RFP Evaluation Criteria",
        "RFP Scoring",
        "Scoring Criteria",
        "Service Level Agreement",
        "Services Procurement",
        "Strategic Sourcing",
        "Technical Solution",
        "Technology Procurement",
        "Total Cost of Ownership",
        "Vendor Evaluation",
        "Vendor Qualifications",
        "Weighted Scoring"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/how-should-an-organization-adjust-its-rfp-scoring-criteria-for-services-versus-technology-procurements/
