# How Should an Organization Determine the Appropriate Weights for Different Criteria in an RFP Scorecard? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-07
**Categories:** Question

---

![A gold-hued precision instrument with a dark, sharp interface engages a complex circuit board, symbolizing high-fidelity execution within institutional market microstructure. This visual metaphor represents a sophisticated RFQ protocol facilitating private quotation and atomic settlement for digital asset derivatives, optimizing capital efficiency and mitigating counterparty risk](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-grade-precision-execution-engine-optimizing-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-within-market-microstructure.jpg)

![A dark blue sphere, representing a deep institutional liquidity pool, integrates a central RFQ engine. This system processes aggregated inquiries for Digital Asset Derivatives, including Bitcoin Options and Ethereum Futures, enabling high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-for-optimized-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## Concept

![Precision mechanics illustrating institutional RFQ protocol dynamics. Metallic and blue blades symbolize principal's bids and counterparty responses, pivoting on a central matching engine](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-microstructure.jpg)

## The RFP Scorecard as a System of Intent

An organization’s Request for Proposal (RFP) scorecard is frequently perceived as a procedural checklist, a bureaucratic instrument for justifying a procurement decision. This view fundamentally misunderstands its power. A properly calibrated scorecard is a system of intent, a quantitative expression of an organization’s strategic priorities. It translates the abstract language of corporate goals ▴ market leadership, operational resilience, technological innovation, financial prudence ▴ into a decisive, data-driven selection mechanism.

The weighting assigned to each criterion is the core of this translation, the very gearwork that connects strategic objectives to operational reality. An improperly weighted scorecard is not a neutral tool; it is a system calibrated for failure, one that guarantees a suboptimal outcome by design.

The process of determining weights is where an organization confronts its true priorities. It forces a conversation that moves beyond vague consensus to the difficult calculus of trade-offs. Is speed-to-market more valuable than long-term scalability? Does the robustness of a vendor’s security protocols outweigh a significant cost advantage?

These are not administrative questions; they are fundamental strategic choices. The weights on a scorecard are the numerical embodiment of these choices. They dictate the selection logic, ensuring that the winning proposal is the one that aligns most closely with what the organization has declared to be most important. Without this disciplined, quantitative framework, procurement decisions become susceptible to subjective bias, internal politics, and the persuasive power of the most compelling salesperson, rather than the objective merits of the solution.

> The process of assigning weights to an RFP scorecard is the act of encoding strategic priorities into a decision-making algorithm.

This system of intent extends beyond a single procurement event. It becomes a component of the organization’s institutional memory. A well-architected weighting framework, when applied consistently, generates a repository of decision data. It allows for post-hoc analysis, enabling leadership to audit not just the outcome of a decision but the logic that produced it.

Did the weights accurately predict long-term value? Where did the chosen vendor excel or fail against the highest-weighted criteria? This feedback loop is impossible without a clear, quantitatively defined set of priorities. The scorecard, therefore, is a critical instrument in building a learning organization, one that refines its selection mechanisms over time based on empirical evidence, not anecdotal experience.

![Sleek teal and beige forms converge, embodying institutional digital asset derivatives platforms. A central RFQ protocol hub with metallic blades signifies high-fidelity execution and price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-microstructure.jpg)

![A sleek, institutional-grade Prime RFQ component features intersecting transparent blades with a glowing core. This visualizes a precise RFQ execution engine, enabling high-fidelity execution and dynamic price discovery for digital asset derivatives, optimizing market microstructure for capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-for-best-execution-microstructure.jpg)

## Strategy

![A sleek, angular metallic system, an algorithmic trading engine, features a central intelligence layer. It embodies high-fidelity RFQ protocols, optimizing price discovery and best execution for institutional digital asset derivatives, managing counterparty risk and slippage](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-for-best-execution.jpg)

## The Calculus of Prioritization

Determining the appropriate weights for RFP criteria is an exercise in structured judgment. It requires a methodology that can capture the complex, often competing, priorities of various stakeholders and translate them into a coherent, defensible numerical framework. Relying on informal discussion or gut feeling introduces significant risk and subjectivity into a process that demands objectivity. Several formal methodologies exist to bring structure to this critical task, each with a distinct set of operational characteristics and strategic implications.

The most common approach is **Direct Weighting**, where an [evaluation committee](https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-committee/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) assigns percentage points to each criterion, summing to 100%. For instance, ‘Technical Capability’ might be assigned 40%, ‘Cost’ 25%, and ‘Vendor Experience’ 20%. This method is intuitive and relatively simple to implement. Its primary weakness, however, is its susceptibility to negotiation tactics and dominant personalities within the evaluation group.

The final weights may reflect the political capital of a department head rather than a dispassionate assessment of strategic need. It serves well for low-complexity procurements where criteria are few and priorities are universally understood.

![Central teal-lit mechanism with radiating pathways embodies a Prime RFQ for institutional digital asset derivatives. It signifies RFQ protocol processing, liquidity aggregation, and high-fidelity execution for multi-leg spread trades, enabling atomic settlement within market microstructure via quantitative analysis](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-core-for-institutional-digital-asset-rfq-protocol-execution-engine.jpg)

## A Hierarchy of Needs

For complex, high-stakes procurements, a more rigorous system is required. The **[Analytic Hierarchy Process](https://prime.greeks.live/area/analytic-hierarchy-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) ([AHP](https://prime.greeks.live/area/ahp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite))** provides a structured technique for dealing with complex decisions. Instead of assigning direct percentage points, AHP breaks down the decision into a series of pairwise comparisons. Evaluators compare each criterion against every other criterion, one-on-one, using a standardized scale (e.g. from 1 = equally important, to 9 = extremely more important).

For example, the committee would be asked ▴ “Is ‘Technical Capability’ more important than ‘Cost’?” and to rate the degree of importance. This process is repeated for all pairs of criteria. A mathematical engine then synthesizes these judgments to derive the relative weights of all criteria. This method has several strategic advantages:

- **Consistency Check** ▴ AHP can mathematically check for inconsistencies in judgment. If a team rates A as more important than B, and B as more important than C, but then rates C as more important than A, the model will flag the logical contradiction, forcing the team to reconsider its judgments.

- **Reduced Bias** ▴ By focusing on comparing only two criteria at a time, AHP simplifies the cognitive task and reduces the influence of overt biases that can skew direct weighting methods.

- **Granularity** ▴ The hierarchical nature of AHP allows for criteria to be broken down into sub-criteria, each with its own set of weights that roll up to the parent category, providing a multi-layered and highly detailed evaluation structure. 

> A structured weighting methodology transforms subjective stakeholder opinions into a unified and logically consistent evaluation framework.

Another approach involves building consensus through iterative feedback, such as the **Delphi Method**. In this technique, a facilitator solicits initial weighting recommendations from each evaluator independently. The aggregated, anonymized results are then shared with the group, who are then invited to revise their weights based on the collective input.

This process is repeated for several rounds until the weights converge toward a stable consensus. This method is particularly useful in geographically dispersed teams or in situations with significant power imbalances, as the anonymity of the process encourages honest input.

The choice of methodology is a strategic decision in itself. It reflects the organization’s commitment to rigor, objectivity, and fairness in its procurement process. A simple procurement may warrant a simple weighting scheme, but a strategic acquisition demands a system that is robust, defensible, and aligned with the complexity of the decision at hand.

### Comparison of Weighting Methodologies

| Methodology | Primary Mechanism | Level of Objectivity | Implementation Complexity | Best Suited For |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Direct Weighting | Stakeholders assign percentage points to each criterion directly. | Low to Medium | Low | Simple, low-risk procurements with clear priorities. |
| Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) | Pairwise comparison of all criteria to derive weights mathematically. | High | High | Complex, high-value, strategic procurements with multiple competing criteria. |
| Delphi Method | Iterative, anonymous surveys to build consensus on weights. | Medium to High | Medium | Situations requiring input from diverse, geographically dispersed, or hierarchical teams. |

![A sophisticated, multi-component system propels a sleek, teal-colored digital asset derivative trade. The complex internal structure represents a proprietary RFQ protocol engine with liquidity aggregation and price discovery mechanisms](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principals-high-fidelity-rfq-engine-for-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

![A precision-engineered component, like an RFQ protocol engine, displays a reflective blade and numerical data. It symbolizes high-fidelity execution within market microstructure, driving price discovery, capital efficiency, and algorithmic trading for institutional Digital Asset Derivatives on a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-execution-engine-core-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-price-discovery.jpg)

## Execution

![A sleek metallic teal execution engine, representing a Crypto Derivatives OS, interfaces with a luminous pre-trade analytics display. This abstract view depicts institutional RFQ protocols enabling high-fidelity execution for multi-leg spreads, optimizing market microstructure and atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/advanced-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-market-microstructure-analysis.jpg)

## An Operational Protocol for Weight Calibration

The theoretical understanding of weighting methodologies must be translated into a rigorous, repeatable operational protocol. This protocol ensures that the final [RFP scorecard](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-scorecard/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is not an artifact of a single meeting but the product of a structured, auditable process. The execution phase moves from the ‘what’ and ‘why’ to the ‘how’ ▴ a granular, step-by-step implementation that ensures the organization’s strategic intent is flawlessly encoded into the evaluation mechanism.

![A precision metallic dial on a multi-layered interface embodies an institutional RFQ engine. The translucent panel suggests an intelligence layer for real-time price discovery and high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives, optimizing capital efficiency for block trades within complex market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-high-fidelity-execution-system.jpg)

## Phase 1 the Stakeholder Synod

Before any numbers are discussed, the right people must be brought into the process. The quality of the output is entirely dependent on the quality of the initial input. This is a political and organizational challenge that requires deliberate execution.

- **Identify Core Evaluators** ▴ This group consists of individuals who will be directly using or managing the procured product or service. Their input is critical for defining functional and technical criteria. This includes end-users, IT integration specialists, and department managers.

- **Incorporate Strategic Oversight** ▴ Senior leadership from finance, operations, and legal must be included. This group ensures that the criteria and their subsequent weights align with broader business objectives, such as [Total Cost of Ownership](https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost-of-ownership/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (TCO), risk appetite, and compliance standards.

- **Appoint a Facilitator** ▴ A neutral facilitator, often from the procurement department, is essential. This individual’s role is to manage the process, enforce the chosen methodology, and ensure that all voices are heard, preventing the loudest from dominating the quietest. The facilitator does not vote on weights but ensures the integrity of the process by which they are derived.

- **Conduct Initial Criteria Brainstorming** ▴ The facilitator leads a session to generate an exhaustive list of potential evaluation criteria. At this stage, no idea is dismissed. The goal is to capture every possible dimension of value, from core functionality to vendor support quality and long-term viability.

![A precision-engineered RFQ protocol engine, its central teal sphere signifies high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives. This module embodies a Principal's dedicated liquidity pool, facilitating robust price discovery and atomic settlement within optimized market microstructure, ensuring best execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-rfq-engine-for-digital-asset-derivatives-best-execution.jpg)

## Phase 2 the Weighting Workshop

This is the central event where strategic priorities are quantified. Using the [Analytic Hierarchy](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-analytic-hierarchy-process-improve-objectivity-in-kpi-weighting/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) Process (AHP) provides the most robust and defensible outcome for complex procurements. The workshop is a highly structured affair, not an open-ended debate.

> A successful weighting workshop does not create consensus through debate; it reveals it through structured analysis.

The facilitator guides the evaluation committee through a [pairwise comparison matrix](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-between-a-requirements-traceability-matrix-and-an-rfp-compliance-matrix/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) for the high-level criteria. Each member of the committee completes the comparison privately first, before the results are aggregated and discussed. This prevents groupthink and allows for a more authentic representation of priorities.

![A sophisticated modular apparatus, likely a Prime RFQ component, showcases high-fidelity execution capabilities. Its interconnected sections, featuring a central glowing intelligence layer, suggest a robust RFQ protocol engine](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-rfq-engine-core-for-digital-asset-derivatives-high-fidelity-execution-protocols.jpg)

## Quantitative Modeling and Data Analysis

The output of the AHP workshop is a set of mathematically derived weights. Let’s consider a practical example for a critical enterprise software procurement. After the brainstorming session, the committee agrees on four main criteria ▴ Technical Platform, Cost, Vendor Viability, and [Implementation Support](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-can-a-firm-operationally-prepare-for-the-implementation-of-a-new-credit-support-annex/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). The AHP process generates the following [pairwise comparison](https://prime.greeks.live/area/pairwise-comparison/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) matrix, where values greater than 1 indicate the row criterion is more important than the column criterion.

### AHP Pairwise Comparison Matrix

| Criterion | Technical Platform | Cost | Vendor Viability | Implementation Support |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Technical Platform | 1 | 3 | 2 | 4 |
| Cost | 1/3 | 1 | 1/2 | 2 |
| Vendor Viability | 1/2 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Implementation Support | 1/4 | 1/2 | 1/3 | 1 |

By normalizing this matrix and calculating the principal eigenvector, the following weights are derived ▴ [Technical Platform](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-technical-and-architectural-challenges-in-building-an-internal-cat-data-analytics-platform/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (45%), Cost (15%), [Vendor Viability](https://prime.greeks.live/area/vendor-viability/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (29%), and Implementation Support (11%). These weights now form the basis of the RFP scorecard. Each criterion is broken down further into specific, measurable questions, and proposals are scored on a predefined scale (e.g.

0-5). The final score is the sum of (score sub-criterion weight main criterion weight).

![Robust institutional Prime RFQ core connects to a precise RFQ protocol engine. Multi-leg spread execution blades propel a digital asset derivative target, optimizing price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-proto-insti-digital-asset-derivs-hi-fi-exec-capital-effi-risk-mgmt.jpg)

## Predictive Scenario Analysis

To illustrate the profound impact of this calibrated system, consider a case study. A mid-sized manufacturing firm, “MechanoCorp,” initiated an RFP for a new Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system. The project was critical for their five-year growth plan, which depended on integrating supply chain, production, and sales data. The evaluation committee was composed of the CFO, the Head of Operations, the IT Director, and a senior production manager.

Two final vendors emerged ▴ “InnovateERP,” a newer, cloud-native platform known for its cutting-edge features and flexibility, and “StableSys,” a legacy provider with a reputation for robustness and a massive install base. A less-structured weighting process, based on informal discussion, might have produced a simple 25% equal weight for the four main criteria. The CFO, focused on the high upfront cost of InnovateERP, would argue for the cost-effectiveness of StableSys. The IT Director, mesmerized by the modern architecture of InnovateERP, would champion its technical superiority.

The Head of Operations, fearing disruption, would lean toward the proven track record of StableSys. The decision would be deadlocked, likely resolved by political maneuvering. However, MechanoCorp employed the AHP protocol. The facilitator guided the team through the pairwise comparison, forcing them to make explicit trade-offs.

When asked to compare “Technical Platform” versus “Vendor Viability,” the team, after much deliberation, rated Technical Platform as ‘moderately more important’ (a score of 3). They reasoned that their growth strategy depended on a flexible, scalable platform that could adapt to future needs; being locked into an older architecture was a greater long-term risk than the perceived stability of a legacy vendor. When comparing “Technical Platform” to “Cost,” they rated it ‘strongly more important’ (a score of 5). The CFO had to concede that the potential gains in efficiency and data integration from a superior platform would, over the long term, far outweigh the initial licensing cost difference.

The final AHP-derived weights were ▴ Technical Platform (55%), Vendor Viability (20%), Implementation Support (15%), and Cost (10%). This was a radical departure from an equal-weighting scheme. It was a quantitative declaration that the firm’s future depended more on technological capability than on short-term budget concerns. When the two vendors were scored against this new, calibrated scorecard, the outcome was decisive.

InnovateERP scored a 4.8/5 on Technical Platform but only a 2.5/5 on Cost. StableSys scored a 3.0/5 on Technical Platform and a 4.5/5 on Cost. On the other criteria, they were roughly equal. Under a simple, equal-weighting scheme, the two vendors would have been neck-and-neck, with StableSys potentially winning due to its lower cost and perceived stability.

But with the AHP-derived weights, the calculation was different. InnovateERP’s weighted score was (4.8 0.55) + (2.5 0.10) +. = 4.15. StableSys’s weighted score was (3.0 0.55) + (4.5 0.10) +.

= 3.45. The choice was clear. MechanoCorp signed with InnovateERP. The first year was challenging, as the implementation support was indeed less mature than StableSys’s would have been.

However, by year two, the platform’s flexibility allowed MechanoCorp to integrate a new predictive maintenance module, a capability that was not even on the original roadmap but which reduced machine downtime by 30%. By year three, their ability to provide real-time supply chain data to clients became a key competitive differentiator, directly contributing to a 15% growth in market share. The AHP process did not just help them choose a vendor; it forced them to define their future and then provided a tool to select the partner best equipped to help them build it. The system of intent had functioned perfectly.

![An intricate mechanical assembly reveals the market microstructure of an institutional-grade RFQ protocol engine. It visualizes high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives block trades, managing counterparty risk and multi-leg spread strategies within a liquidity pool, embodying a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-architecture.jpg)

## Phase 3 System Integration and Iterative Refinement

The process does not end with the [vendor selection](https://prime.greeks.live/area/vendor-selection/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). The scorecard becomes a living document, a dataset for future improvement.

- **Performance Monitoring** ▴ The chosen vendor’s performance should be tracked against the very criteria in the scorecard. Did they deliver on the functionality that received the highest scores? Was the TCO aligned with the ‘Cost’ evaluation?

- **Post-Mortem Analysis** ▴ After implementation, the evaluation committee should reconvene to analyze the effectiveness of the scorecard. Were there any criteria that were over-weighted or under-weighted in hindsight? Was there a critical success factor that was missed entirely?

- **Institutional Knowledge Base** ▴ The results of this analysis are used to refine the weighting framework for future RFPs. This creates a cycle of continuous improvement, making the organization’s procurement function progressively more intelligent and strategically aligned.

![A transparent, multi-faceted component, indicative of an RFQ engine's intricate market microstructure logic, emerges from complex FIX Protocol connectivity. Its sharp edges signify high-fidelity execution and price discovery precision for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimized-for-best-execution.jpg)

## References

- Saaty, Thomas L. _The Analytic Hierarchy Process ▴ Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation_. McGraw-Hill, 1980.

- Bascetin, A. “A decision-making process for supplier selection using AHP and Fuzzy AHP.” _Mevlana International Journal of Science_, vol. 1, no. 2, 2012, pp. 65-77.

- Vaidya, O. S. and S. Kumar. “Analytic hierarchy process ▴ An overview of applications.” _European Journal of Operational Research_, vol. 169, no. 1, 2006, pp. 1-29.

- Büyüközkan, G. and G. Çifçi. “A novel fuzzy multi-criteria decision framework for sustainable supplier selection with incomplete information.” _Computers in Industry_, vol. 62, no. 2, 2011, pp. 164-174.

- Ho, W. X. Xu, and P. K. Dey. “Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection ▴ A literature review.” _European Journal of Operational Research_, vol. 202, no. 1, 2010, pp. 16-24.

- De Boer, L. E. Labro, and P. Morlacchi. “A review of methods supporting supplier selection.” _European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management_, vol. 7, no. 2, 2001, pp. 75-89.

- Kull, T. J. and S. A. Melnyk. “The Analytic Hierarchy Process in a services setting ▴ A cautionary note.” _Journal of Supply Chain Management_, vol. 42, no. 1, 2006, pp. 44-58.

- Tahriri, F. et al. “AHP approach for supplier evaluation and selection in a steel manufacturing company.” _Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management_, vol. 1, no. 2, 2008, pp. 54-76.

![A cutaway view reveals an advanced RFQ protocol engine for institutional digital asset derivatives. Intricate coiled components represent algorithmic liquidity provision and portfolio margin calculations](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocol-engine-digital-asset-derivatives-core-internal-mechanism-visualized.jpg)

## Reflection

![A polished metallic modular hub with four radiating arms represents an advanced RFQ execution engine. This system aggregates multi-venue liquidity for institutional digital asset derivatives, enabling high-fidelity execution and precise price discovery across diverse counterparty risk profiles, powered by a sophisticated intelligence layer](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/principal-rfq-hub-digital-asset-derivatives-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## The Signature of a System

An organization reveals its character through the systems it builds. The methodology used to weigh RFP criteria is more than a procurement tactic; it is a signature of the organization’s operational philosophy. A system built on rigor, analytical honesty, and collaborative judgment will invariably select partners that amplify those same qualities.

Conversely, a process governed by expediency and subjectivity will attract vendors who are skilled in navigating ambiguity, not in delivering value. The framework is not inert; it actively shapes the ecosystem of partners and suppliers that surrounds the business.

Reflecting on your own organization’s process, consider the underlying system it represents. Does it systematically dismantle bias, or does it provide a venue for it? Does it force a confrontation with difficult strategic trade-offs, or does it allow for comfortable, consensus-driven ambiguity? The scorecard is a mirror.

The discipline required to calibrate it correctly is the same discipline required for sustained strategic execution. The ultimate value, therefore, lies not in the final score given to a vendor, but in the institutional capacity built during the process of determining what truly matters.

![Precision-machined metallic mechanism with intersecting brushed steel bars and central hub, revealing an intelligence layer, on a polished base with control buttons. This symbolizes a robust RFQ protocol engine, ensuring high-fidelity execution, atomic settlement, and optimized price discovery for institutional digital asset derivatives within complex market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-1.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-committee/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A central core represents a Prime RFQ engine, facilitating high-fidelity execution. Transparent, layered structures denote aggregated liquidity pools and multi-leg spread strategies](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-engine-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

## Evaluation Committee

Meaning ▴ An Evaluation Committee constitutes a formally constituted internal governance body responsible for the systematic assessment of proposals, solutions, or counterparties, ensuring alignment with an institution's strategic objectives and operational parameters within the digital asset ecosystem. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/analytic-hierarchy-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A close-up of a sophisticated, multi-component mechanism, representing the core of an institutional-grade Crypto Derivatives OS. Its precise engineering suggests high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement, crucial for robust RFQ protocols, ensuring optimal price discovery and capital efficiency in multi-leg spread trading](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-rfq-engine-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

## Analytic Hierarchy Process

Meaning ▴ The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) constitutes a structured methodology for organizing and analyzing complex decision problems, particularly those involving multiple, often conflicting, criteria and subjective judgments. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/ahp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A central reflective sphere, representing a Principal's algorithmic trading core, rests within a luminous liquidity pool, intersected by a precise execution bar. This visualizes price discovery for digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols, reflecting market microstructure optimization within an institutional grade Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-rfq-engine-for-digital-asset-derivatives-best-execution.jpg)

## Ahp

Meaning ▴ The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) constitutes a structured decision-making framework, systematically organizing complex problems into a hierarchical structure of goals, criteria, and alternatives. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-scorecard/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A complex, reflective apparatus with concentric rings and metallic arms supporting two distinct spheres. This embodies RFQ protocols, market microstructure, and high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-3.jpg)

## Rfp Scorecard

Meaning ▴ An RFP Scorecard constitutes a structured evaluation framework designed to systematically assess and quantify the suitability of vendor proposals in the context of institutional digital asset derivatives. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost-of-ownership/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A symmetrical, intricate digital asset derivatives execution engine. Its metallic and translucent elements visualize a robust RFQ protocol facilitating multi-leg spread execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-best-execution.jpg)

## Total Cost of Ownership

Meaning ▴ Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) represents a comprehensive financial estimate encompassing all direct and indirect expenditures associated with an asset or system throughout its entire operational lifecycle. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-analytic-hierarchy-process-improve-objectivity-in-kpi-weighting/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, segmented cream and dark gray automated device, depicting an institutional grade Prime RFQ engine. It represents precise execution management system functionality for digital asset derivatives, optimizing price discovery and high-fidelity execution within market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-engine-optimal-institutional-digital-asset-execution-system.jpg)

## Analytic Hierarchy

The Analytic Hierarchy Process improves objectivity by structuring decisions and using pairwise comparisons to create transparent, consistent KPI weights. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-between-a-requirements-traceability-matrix-and-an-rfp-compliance-matrix/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precision-engineered metallic cross-structure, embodying an RFQ engine's market microstructure, showcases diverse elements. One granular arm signifies aggregated liquidity pools and latent liquidity](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-rfq-engine-microstructure-for-atomic-settlement.jpg)

## Pairwise Comparison Matrix

An RTM ensures a product is built right; an RFP Compliance Matrix proves a proposal is bid right. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-can-a-firm-operationally-prepare-for-the-implementation-of-a-new-credit-support-annex/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Central polished disc, with contrasting segments, represents Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives Prime RFQ core. A textured rod signifies RFQ Protocol High-Fidelity Execution and Low Latency Market Microstructure data flow to the Quantitative Analysis Engine for Price Discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-core-system-high-fidelity.jpg)

## Implementation Support

A firm prepares for a new CSA by architecting an integrated system of legal, operational, and technological protocols to manage collateral dynamically. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/pairwise-comparison/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precision-engineered, multi-layered mechanism symbolizing a robust RFQ protocol engine for institutional digital asset derivatives. Its components represent aggregated liquidity, atomic settlement, and high-fidelity execution within a sophisticated market microstructure, enabling efficient price discovery and optimal capital efficiency for block trades](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine.jpg)

## Pairwise Comparison

Meaning ▴ Pairwise Comparison is a systematic method for evaluating entities by comparing them two at a time, across a defined set of criteria, to establish a relative preference or value. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-technical-and-architectural-challenges-in-building-an-internal-cat-data-analytics-platform/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A robust circular Prime RFQ component with horizontal data channels, radiating a turquoise glow signifying price discovery. This institutional-grade RFQ system facilitates high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives, optimizing market microstructure and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-rfq-engine-for-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

## Technical Platform

Building a cat data analytics platform requires architecting a scalable system to master the immense variety and velocity of its composite data streams. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/vendor-viability/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sophisticated teal and black device with gold accents symbolizes a Principal's operational framework for institutional digital asset derivatives. It represents a high-fidelity execution engine, integrating RFQ protocols for atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-core-engine-for-best-execution.jpg)

## Vendor Viability

Meaning ▴ Vendor Viability defines the comprehensive assessment of a technology provider's enduring capacity to deliver and sustain critical services for institutional operations, particularly within the demanding context of institutional digital asset derivatives. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/vendor-selection/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![The abstract visual depicts a sophisticated, transparent execution engine showcasing market microstructure for institutional digital asset derivatives. Its central matching engine facilitates RFQ protocol execution, revealing internal algorithmic trading logic and high-fidelity execution pathways](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-rfq-engine-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

## Vendor Selection

Meaning ▴ Vendor Selection defines the systematic, analytical process undertaken by an institutional entity to identify, evaluate, and onboard third-party service providers for critical technological and operational components within its digital asset derivatives infrastructure. </a>

**Tags:** [Strategic Sourcing](https://options.greeks.live/area/strategic-sourcing/), [Pairwise Comparison](https://options.greeks.live/area/pairwise-comparison/), [AHP](https://options.greeks.live/area/ahp/), [RFP Scorecard](https://options.greeks.live/area/rfp-scorecard/), [Evaluation Committee](https://options.greeks.live/area/evaluation-committee/), [Vendor Viability](https://options.greeks.live/area/vendor-viability/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [How Do You Effectively Weight Criteria in an Rfp Scoring Matrix?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-effectively-weight-criteria-in-an-rfp-scoring-matrix/)
![Three metallic, circular mechanisms represent a calibrated system for institutional-grade digital asset derivatives trading. The central dial signifies price discovery and algorithmic precision within RFQ protocols. Outer elements reflect liquidity pool dynamics and high-fidelity execution in complex market microstructure, managing counterparty risk.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-and-execution-precision.jpg)

Effective RFP criteria weighting translates strategic priorities into a defensible, quantitative decision-making framework.

- 
### [How Can an Organization Transition from a Single to a Dual RFP Weighting Model?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-transition-from-a-single-to-a-dual-rfp-weighting-model/)
![Abstract dual-cone object reflects RFQ Protocol dynamism. It signifies robust Liquidity Aggregation, High-Fidelity Execution, and Principal-to-Principal negotiation. Essential for Crypto Derivatives OS Block Trades, ensuring Atomic Settlement and Volatility Surface integrity.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-grade-rfq-execution-framework-for-digital-asset-derivatives-optimal-liquidity-aggregation-and-atomic-settlement.jpg)

Transitioning to a dual RFP weighting model separates qualitative from financial evaluation, enabling a value-based, data-driven procurement decision.

- 
### [How Should an Rfp Scoring Model Be Adjusted for Different Industries or Project Sizes?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-should-an-rfp-scoring-model-be-adjusted-for-different-industries-or-project-sizes/)
![A proprietary Prime RFQ platform featuring extending blue/teal components, representing a multi-leg options strategy or complex RFQ spread. The labeled band 'F331 46 1' denotes a specific strike price or option series within an aggregated inquiry for high-fidelity execution, showcasing granular market microstructure data points.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-protocol-1.jpg)

An RFP scoring model is adjusted by re-calibrating criteria and weights to mirror the specific risks and value drivers of the industry and project scale.

- 
### [What Are the Primary Challenges When Defining the Criteria in an Ahp Hierarchy for an Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-challenges-when-defining-the-criteria-in-an-ahp-hierarchy-for-an-rfp/)
![A teal-blue textured sphere, signifying a unique RFQ inquiry or private quotation, precisely mounts on a metallic, institutional-grade base. Integrated into a Prime RFQ framework, it illustrates high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement for digital asset derivatives within market microstructure, ensuring capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-prime-os-execution-1.jpg)

Defining AHP criteria for an RFP is a challenge of structuring subjective stakeholder values into a single, objective, and defensible decision model.

- 
### [How Do You Effectively Weight Non-Financial Criteria in an Rfp Evaluation?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-effectively-weight-non-financial-criteria-in-an-rfp-evaluation/)
![A futuristic system component with a split design and intricate central element, embodying advanced RFQ protocols. This visualizes high-fidelity execution, precise price discovery, and granular market microstructure control for institutional digital asset derivatives, optimizing liquidity provision and minimizing slippage.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/advanced-rfq-protocols-for-digital-asset-derivatives-price-discovery.jpg)

A systematic process of assigning quantitative weights to predefined criteria, enabling an objective, defensible vendor selection.

- 
### [How Can Weighted Scoring in an Rfp Mitigate the Risk of Adverse Selection?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-weighted-scoring-in-an-rfp-mitigate-the-risk-of-adverse-selection/)
![Precision-engineered institutional-grade Prime RFQ modules connect via intricate hardware, embodying robust RFQ protocols for digital asset derivatives. This underlying market microstructure enables high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement, optimizing capital efficiency. A metallic button suggests precise private quotation control.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/precision-engineered-prime-os-modules-enabling-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-for-best-execution.jpg)

Weighted scoring mitigates adverse selection by translating strategic priorities into a quantitative framework that values holistic capability over low price.

- 
### [How Can an Organization Objectively Score Qualitative Criteria like Vendor Vision or Cultural Fit in an Rfp Evaluation?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-objectively-score-qualitative-criteria-like-vendor-vision-or-cultural-fit-in-an-rfp-evaluation/)
![Mirrored abstract components with glowing indicators, linked by an articulated mechanism, depict an institutional grade Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives. This visualizes RFQ protocol driven high-fidelity execution, price discovery, and atomic settlement across market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-rfq-high-fidelity-execution-microstructure.jpg)

Objectively scoring qualitative RFP criteria requires deconstructing abstract concepts into a matrix of weighted, measurable indicators.

- 
### [How Do You Assign Weights to Different Rfp Evaluation Criteria?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-assign-weights-to-different-rfp-evaluation-criteria/)
![A precision digital token, subtly green with a '0' marker, meticulously engages a sleek, white institutional-grade platform. This symbolizes secure RFQ protocol initiation for high-fidelity execution of complex multi-leg spread strategies, optimizing portfolio margin and capital efficiency within a Principal's Crypto Derivatives OS.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-platform-secure-rfq-protocol-initiation-for-optimal-block-trade-execution.jpg)

Assigning weights to RFP criteria is the system for translating strategic intent into a quantifiable, defensible procurement decision.

- 
### [What Is the Optimal Weight for Price in a Complex Technology Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-optimal-weight-for-price-in-a-complex-technology-rfp/)
![A beige spool feeds dark, reflective material into an advanced processing unit, illuminated by a vibrant blue light. This depicts high-fidelity execution of institutional digital asset derivatives through a Prime RFQ, enabling precise price discovery for aggregated RFQ inquiries within complex market microstructure, ensuring atomic settlement.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-prime-os-3.jpg)

The optimal price weight in a tech RFP is a dynamic calibration that subordinates initial cost to the systemic value of quality and risk.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "How Should an Organization Determine the Appropriate Weights for Different Criteria in an RFP Scorecard?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-should-an-organization-determine-the-appropriate-weights-for-different-criteria-in-an-rfp-scorecard/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-should-an-organization-determine-the-appropriate-weights-for-different-criteria-in-an-rfp-scorecard/"
    },
    "headline": "How Should an Organization Determine the Appropriate Weights for Different Criteria in an RFP Scorecard? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "Determining RFP scorecard weights is the strategic translation of corporate priorities into a quantitative, defensible decision engine. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-should-an-organization-determine-the-appropriate-weights-for-different-criteria-in-an-rfp-scorecard/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-07T10:10:17+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-08-07T10:10:21+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-core-engine-for-best-execution.jpg",
        "caption": "A precision-engineered financial instrument, featuring a prominent teal sphere as its central intelligence layer, mounted on a robust black module with intricate gold banding. This apparatus visually abstracts a core institutional digital asset derivatives trading system. It symbolizes a sophisticated RFQ protocol engine for high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement of multi-leg spreads. Embodying the Principal's operational framework, it leverages quantitative analysis for delta hedging, ensuring capital efficiency and best execution on a Prime RFQ."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "AHP",
        "Analytic Hierarchy Process",
        "Criteria Weighting",
        "Decision Framework",
        "Evaluation Committee",
        "Multi-Criteria Decision Making",
        "Pairwise Comparison",
        "Procurement Strategy",
        "RFP Scorecard",
        "RFP Scoring",
        "Strategic Sourcing",
        "Supplier Evaluation",
        "Total Cost of Ownership",
        "Vendor Selection",
        "Vendor Viability"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/how-should-an-organization-determine-the-appropriate-weights-for-different-criteria-in-an-rfp-scorecard/
