# How Should an Organization Determine the Appropriate Weights for Different RFP Scoring Criteria? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-10
**Categories:** Question

---

![A clear glass sphere, symbolizing a precise RFQ block trade, rests centrally on a sophisticated Prime RFQ platform. The metallic surface suggests intricate market microstructure for high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives, enabling price discovery for institutional grade trading](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-2.jpg)

![Angular translucent teal structures intersect on a smooth base, reflecting light against a deep blue sphere. This embodies RFQ Protocol architecture, symbolizing High-Fidelity Execution for Digital Asset Derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/dynamic-rfq-protocol-architecture-optimizing-digital-asset-derivative-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## Concept

Determining the appropriate weights for Request for Proposal (RFP) scoring criteria is an exercise in systemic design, a process of encoding an organization’s strategic priorities into a quantifiable evaluation framework. It is the mechanism by which abstract objectives, such as long-term value, risk mitigation, and innovation, are translated into a decision-making protocol. The allocation of weights is a declaration of intent, signaling to the market what the organization values and providing internal stakeholders with a calibrated instrument for objective assessment. This process moves procurement from a transactional function to a strategic one, where every percentage point assigned to a criterion is a deliberate articulation of corporate strategy.

The core of this undertaking is the creation of a [value model](https://prime.greeks.live/area/value-model/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). This model serves as the blueprint for the evaluation, defining the architecture of the decision itself. It forces an organization to confront and codify its priorities with precision. Without a robust weighting system, an RFP process can become susceptible to subjective biases, where the loudest voice in the room or the most superficially attractive proposal can prevail, irrespective of its alignment with deeper organizational needs.

A [structured weighting methodology provides](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-market-makers-inventory-position-influence-the-quotes-it-provides-to-clients/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) the necessary discipline, ensuring that all proposals are measured against the same meticulously constructed yardstick. This system transforms the evaluation from a qualitative discussion into a quantitative analysis, providing a defensible and transparent foundation for high-stakes sourcing decisions.

![A complex core mechanism with two structured arms illustrates a Principal Crypto Derivatives OS executing RFQ protocols. This system enables price discovery and high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives block trades, optimizing market microstructure and capital efficiency via private quotations](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-protocol-system.jpg)

## The Architecture of Value Definition

The initial phase of designing an RFP weighting system involves a rigorous internal discovery process. This is not a simple matter of listing requirements; it is an act of institutional introspection. Key stakeholders from across the organization ▴ operations, finance, technology, legal, and the end-user business units ▴ must be convened to build a shared understanding of the desired outcome.

This collaborative effort is essential to map the full spectrum of value, which often extends far beyond the immediate utility of the procured good or service. The goal is to deconstruct the procurement objective into a hierarchy of constituent criteria, each representing a distinct dimension of value.

These criteria typically fall into several core domains ▴ technical capability, financial viability, operational performance, security posture, and strategic alignment. Within each domain, more granular sub-criteria are defined. For instance, under Technical Capability, one might find sub-criteria for system performance, scalability, integration capabilities, and user interface design. The process of defining this hierarchy is foundational.

It establishes the vocabulary for the evaluation and creates a comprehensive framework that ensures all critical aspects of a potential partnership are systematically considered. The resulting structure forms the skeleton of the [scoring model](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-simple-scoring-and-weighted-scoring-in-an-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), ready to be infused with strategic intent through the allocation of weights.

![A stylized rendering illustrates a robust RFQ protocol within an institutional market microstructure, depicting high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives. A transparent mechanism channels a precise order, symbolizing efficient price discovery and atomic settlement for block trades via a prime brokerage system](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-execution-digital-asset-derivatives-options-high-fidelity-trading.jpg)

## From Strategic Intent to Mathematical Expression

Once the criteria hierarchy is established, the process of assigning weights begins. This is the most critical phase, where strategic priorities are converted into mathematical expressions. The fundamental principle is that the weight assigned to a criterion must be directly proportional to its strategic importance in achieving the overall objective.

A common approach is to allocate weights at the category level first, ensuring they sum to 100%, and then to distribute those weights among the sub-criteria within each category. For example, ‘Technical Capability’ might be assigned a weight of 40%, while ‘Cost’ receives 30%, and ‘Vendor Viability’ gets 20%, with the remaining 10% allocated to ‘Implementation Plan’.

> A structured weighting methodology provides the necessary discipline, ensuring that all proposals are measured against the same meticulously constructed yardstick.

This top-down allocation ensures that the overall strategic balance is maintained. If innovation is a key driver for the procurement, the criteria related to a vendor’s technological roadmap and research and development investment should receive a proportionally higher weight. Conversely, for a commodity purchase, cost and delivery reliability would rightly dominate the weighting scheme. The transparency of this process is paramount.

All stakeholders must understand and agree upon the final weighting structure before the RFP is issued. This pre-alignment prevents disputes during the evaluation phase and ensures that the final decision is a direct reflection of the organization’s stated goals. This mathematical model becomes the engine of the evaluation, driving an objective and repeatable process for identifying the optimal vendor.

![Sleek metallic panels expose a circuit board, its glowing blue-green traces symbolizing dynamic market microstructure and intelligence layer data flow. A silver stylus embodies a Principal's precise interaction with a Crypto Derivatives OS, enabling high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-microstructure-os.jpg)

![An abstract metallic circular interface with intricate patterns visualizes an institutional grade RFQ protocol for block trade execution. A central pivot holds a golden pointer with a transparent liquidity pool sphere and a blue pointer, depicting market microstructure optimization and high-fidelity execution for multi-leg spread price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-market-microstructure-optimization.jpg)

## Strategy

Developing a strategy for weighting [RFP criteria](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-criteria/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) requires a systematic approach that transcends simple point allocation. It involves adopting a formal decision-making framework to structure the judgment of the evaluation team, thereby minimizing cognitive biases and ensuring a consistent, defensible outcome. The selection of a [weighting methodology](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-sa-ccr-improve-upon-the-current-exposure-methodology/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is itself a strategic choice, reflecting the complexity of the procurement and the organization’s commitment to analytical rigor. A robust strategy provides a clear pathway from high-level business objectives to the granular weights applied to individual scoring criteria, creating a direct and traceable link between what the organization aims to achieve and how it measures potential partners.

At the heart of this strategy is the principle of relative importance. It is insufficient to simply declare that one criterion is “more important” than another. The strategy must provide a means to quantify how much more important it is. This is where multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methodologies become invaluable.

These frameworks provide structured techniques for comparing criteria against one another, translating subjective human judgments into precise numerical weights. By formalizing this process, an organization can create a weighting scheme that accurately reflects the nuanced trade-offs inherent in any complex sourcing decision. The strategy also encompasses the governance of the weighting process, defining who participates, how disagreements are resolved, and how the final weights are approved and communicated.

![Abstract geometric forms converge at a central point, symbolizing institutional digital asset derivatives trading. This depicts RFQ protocol aggregation and price discovery across diverse liquidity pools, ensuring high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-microstructure-core-liquidity-hub.jpg)

## Systematic Frameworks for Weight Determination

To move beyond arbitrary weight assignment, organizations can deploy established MCDM frameworks. One of the most effective and widely used is the [Analytic Hierarchy Process](https://prime.greeks.live/area/analytic-hierarchy-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) ([AHP](https://prime.greeks.live/area/ahp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)). AHP provides a structured technique for organizing and analyzing complex decisions, based on mathematics and psychology.

It was developed to help decision-makers set priorities and make the best decision when both qualitative and quantitative aspects of a decision need to be considered. The process involves breaking down the decision problem into a hierarchy of more easily comprehended sub-problems, each of which can be analyzed independently.

The core of the AHP methodology lies in the use of pairwise comparisons. Instead of asking evaluators to assign a percentage weight to a long list of criteria, AHP simplifies the task by presenting them with a series of one-on-one comparisons. For each pair of criteria, the evaluator is asked to judge which is more important and by what degree, using a standardized numerical scale. For example, when comparing ‘Cost’ and ‘Technical Quality’, the team might decide that quality is “moderately more important,” which corresponds to a specific value on the AHP scale.

This process is repeated for all pairs of criteria within the same level of the hierarchy. The mathematical engine of AHP then synthesizes these judgments to derive the priority weights for each criterion. This approach is more intuitive for participants and produces a set of weights that are mathematically consistent and robust.

![A precise, multi-faceted geometric structure represents institutional digital asset derivatives RFQ protocols. Its sharp angles denote high-fidelity execution and price discovery for multi-leg spread strategies, symbolizing capital efficiency and atomic settlement within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-framework.jpg)

## Comparative Analysis of Weighting Methodologies

While AHP is a powerful tool, it is one of several available methodologies. Understanding the alternatives allows an organization to select the approach best suited to its specific needs. The table below compares AHP with two other common methods ▴ Direct Point Allocation and Swing Weighting.

| Methodology | Description | Strengths | Weaknesses |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Direct Point Allocation | Evaluators are given 100 points to distribute among the criteria based on perceived importance. | Simple to understand and quick to implement. Useful for less complex or lower-value procurements. | Can be highly subjective and prone to cognitive biases. Lacks a mechanism for ensuring consistency in judgments. |
| Swing Weighting | Evaluators consider the ‘swing’ in value from the worst possible outcome to the best possible outcome for each criterion and assign weights based on the magnitude of this swing. | Focuses on the value range, which can be more meaningful than abstract importance. Encourages a deeper consideration of what each criterion contributes. | Can be more complex to facilitate than direct allocation. Requires a clear definition of best and worst-case scenarios for each criterion. |
| Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) | Uses pairwise comparisons of criteria to derive weights mathematically. Breaks down the problem into a hierarchy. | Highly structured and rigorous. Reduces cognitive load on evaluators. Includes a mechanism for checking the consistency of judgments. | Can be time-consuming to set up and execute for very complex decisions with many criteria. Requires specialized software or complex spreadsheets. |

![An angular, teal-tinted glass component precisely integrates into a metallic frame, signifying the Prime RFQ intelligence layer. This visualizes high-fidelity execution and price discovery for institutional digital asset derivatives, enabling volatility surface analysis and multi-leg spread optimization via RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocol-for-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

## Aligning Criteria with Strategic Sourcing Objectives

The weighting strategy must be directly informed by the organization’s broader [strategic sourcing](https://prime.greeks.live/area/strategic-sourcing/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) goals. Strategic sourcing is a holistic approach to procurement that seeks to leverage enterprise-wide purchasing power and optimize the [total cost of ownership](https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost-of-ownership/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), rather than just the initial purchase price. The weights assigned in an RFP are the primary tool for ensuring that the evaluation process supports these larger objectives. For instance, if a key strategic goal is to foster innovation within the supply base, the criteria related to a vendor’s R&D capabilities, technology roadmap, and willingness to co-invest in development should be weighted heavily.

> The selection of a weighting methodology is itself a strategic choice, reflecting the complexity of the procurement and the organization’s commitment to analytical rigor.

This alignment requires a clear translation of strategic goals into measurable RFP criteria. The following list outlines how common strategic sourcing objectives can be mapped to specific criteria categories, which would then be assigned significant weight in the scoring model:

- **Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) Reduction** ▴ This objective goes beyond the initial price. The weighting strategy should elevate criteria such as implementation costs, training requirements, ongoing maintenance fees, and the cost of potential system decommissioning.

- **Supply Chain Risk Mitigation** ▴ To support this goal, the model must prioritize criteria related to the vendor’s financial stability, geographic diversity of operations, data security protocols, and documented business continuity and disaster recovery plans.

- **Supplier Relationship Management** ▴ If the strategy is to build long-term partnerships, weights should be increased for criteria that assess the vendor’s cultural fit, demonstrated commitment to customer success, governance structure, and willingness to agree to collaborative performance metrics. 

- **Innovation and Technology Leadership** ▴ To drive this objective, the evaluation must favor vendors who can demonstrate a strong technology roadmap, significant investment in research and development, and a portfolio of cutting-edge solutions.

By consciously designing the weighting scheme to reflect these strategic imperatives, the procurement function ensures that the RFP process becomes a powerful lever for achieving enterprise-level goals. The final weighted scorecard is a direct reflection of this strategy, guiding the organization to a decision that is optimized for long-term value, not just short-term cost.

![A sleek, multi-layered platform with a reflective blue dome represents an institutional grade Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives. The glowing interstice symbolizes atomic settlement and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/optimized-rfq-protocol-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-1.jpg)

![A sphere split into light and dark segments, revealing a luminous core. This encapsulates the precise Request for Quote RFQ protocol for institutional digital asset derivatives, highlighting high-fidelity execution, optimal price discovery, and advanced market microstructure within aggregated liquidity pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-execution-framework-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-request-for-quote-protocol-optimization.jpg)

## Execution

The execution phase translates the strategic framework for RFP weighting into a concrete, operational process. This is where the architectural design meets the realities of implementation. It requires meticulous planning, disciplined facilitation, and the use of appropriate tools to ensure that the derived weights are a true and accurate representation of the organization’s collective judgment.

The execution is a multi-stage process that begins with stakeholder mobilization and culminates in a finalized, approved scoring model that is ready for deployment. A flawless execution ensures that the integrity of the weighting strategy is maintained throughout, resulting in a decision-making instrument that is both robust and defensible.

A critical component of execution is the management of the human element. Bringing together a diverse group of stakeholders, each with their own perspectives and biases, requires a structured and impartial facilitation process. The objective is to harness the collective intelligence of the group while filtering out the noise of individual agendas. This involves establishing clear rules of engagement, using a common language for evaluation, and employing a systematic methodology that guides the participants toward a consensus.

The operational playbook for execution must therefore be as much about managing people as it is about managing numbers. It is a choreographed effort to produce a quantitative output from a series of qualitative inputs.

![Abstract visual representing an advanced RFQ system for institutional digital asset derivatives. It depicts a central principal platform orchestrating algorithmic execution across diverse liquidity pools, facilitating precise market microstructure interactions for best execution and potential atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-platform-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-ecosystem.jpg)

## The Operational Playbook for Weighting Facilitation

Successfully executing a weighting session, particularly when using a sophisticated method like AHP, requires a detailed operational plan. This playbook ensures that the process is efficient, transparent, and effective. The following steps provide a comprehensive guide for facilitating a weighting workshop:

- **Preparation and Scoping** ▴ 

<li>Finalize the list of evaluation team members, ensuring representation from all key stakeholder groups.

- Distribute a pre-read package containing the final criteria hierarchy, definitions for each criterion, and an overview of the selected weighting methodology (e.g. AHP).

- Prepare the necessary tools, whether it’s a dedicated AHP software platform or a pre-built spreadsheet designed to capture pairwise comparisons and perform the necessary calculations.

</li>
- **Workshop Kick-off and Calibration** ▴ 

<li>Begin the session with a restatement of the procurement’s strategic objectives to ground the discussion.

- Provide a detailed walkthrough of the weighting methodology, explaining the logic behind it and the scale that will be used for judgments (e.g. the AHP 1-9 scale).

- Conduct a calibration exercise using a non-controversial example to ensure all participants are comfortable with the process of making pairwise comparisons.

</li>
- **Facilitated Pairwise Comparisons** ▴ 

<li>Project the [pairwise comparison matrix](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-structure-an-rfp-evaluation-matrix-for-objective-vendor-comparison/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) for the first set of criteria.

- For each pair, facilitate a discussion among the stakeholders. The facilitator’s role is to guide the conversation toward a consensus judgment on the relative importance of the two criteria.

- The facilitator asks the key question ▴ “Of these two criteria, which is more important in achieving our overall goal, and by how much?”

- Record the consensus judgment in the AHP tool. If a strong consensus cannot be reached, the facilitator may need to use techniques like averaging individual scores or conducting a vote.

</li>
- **Consistency Check and Refinement** ▴ 

<li>Once all pairwise comparisons for a given level of the hierarchy are complete, the AHP tool will calculate a Consistency Ratio (CR). This metric measures the internal consistency of the judgments.

- A CR above a certain threshold (typically 0.10) indicates that some of the judgments are contradictory.

- The facilitator should guide the team in reviewing the most inconsistent judgments and re-evaluating them to improve the logical consistency of the model. This iterative refinement is a key strength of the AHP process. 

</li>
- **Finalization and Approval** ▴ 

<li>Once all criteria have been weighted and the consistency is acceptable, present the final derived weights to the group.

- Facilitate a final discussion to ensure that the results feel intuitively correct to the stakeholders and align with the strategic objectives discussed at the outset.

- Obtain formal sign-off on the final weights from the project sponsor or steering committee. These approved weights are then locked and integrated into the [RFP scoring](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-scoring/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) template.

</li>

![Interlocking transparent and opaque geometric planes on a dark surface. This abstract form visually articulates the intricate Market Microstructure of Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives, embodying High-Fidelity Execution through advanced RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/geometric-abstraction-of-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-market-microstructure-driving-high-fidelity-execution-via-principal-rfq-protocols-and-optimal-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## Quantitative Modeling in Practice

The core of the AHP execution is the quantitative model that translates the team’s qualitative judgments into precise weights. This is accomplished through the construction and analysis of a [pairwise comparison](https://prime.greeks.live/area/pairwise-comparison/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) matrix. For each level of the criteria hierarchy, a square matrix is created. The team’s judgments are entered into this matrix, and then a mathematical process, typically involving eigenvector calculation, is used to derive the priority vector, which represents the weights of the criteria.

> A flawless execution ensures that the integrity of the weighting strategy is maintained throughout, resulting in a decision-making instrument that is both robust and defensible.

The table below illustrates a simplified pairwise comparison matrix for a set of high-level criteria. The judgments are made using Saaty’s 1-9 scale, where 1 means equal importance, and 9 means one element is extremely more important than the other. The value entered represents the importance of the row criterion relative to the column criterion. For example, the value of 3 in the ‘Quality’ row and ‘Cost’ column signifies that Quality is considered three times as important as Cost.

### AHP Pairwise Comparison Matrix Example

| Criteria | Quality | Cost | Delivery | Service | Derived Weight |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Quality | 1 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 45.8% |
| Cost | 1/3 | 1 | 3 | 1/2 | 18.5% |
| Delivery | 1/5 | 1/3 | 1 | 1/4 | 7.7% |
| Service | 1/2 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 28.0% |

This matrix provides a structured input for the AHP calculation. The “Derived Weight” column shows the output of that calculation ▴ a set of normalized, ratio-scale weights that reflect the collective judgments of the evaluation team. This quantitative rigor ensures that the final scoring model is built on a solid mathematical foundation, free from the inconsistencies of less structured methods.

![A precise RFQ engine extends into an institutional digital asset liquidity pool, symbolizing high-fidelity execution and advanced price discovery within complex market microstructure. This embodies a Principal's operational framework for multi-leg spread strategies and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-engine-interfacing-core-liquidity-system.jpg)

## References

- Vargas, L. G. “An overview of the analytic hierarchy process and its applications.” _European journal of operational research_ 48.1 (1990) ▴ 2-8.

- Saaty, Thomas L. “How to make a decision ▴ The analytic hierarchy process.” _European journal of operational research_ 48.1 (1990) ▴ 9-26.

- Ghodsypour, S. H. and C. O’Brien. “A decision support system for supplier selection using a combined analytic hierarchy process and linear programming.” _International journal of production economics_ 56 (1998) ▴ 199-212.

- Tahriri, F. et al. “AHP approach for supplier evaluation and selection in a steel manufacturing company.” _Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management_ 1.2 (2008) ▴ 54-76.

- Ho, William, Xiaowei Xu, and Prasanta K. Dey. “Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection ▴ A literature review.” _European Journal of Operational Research_ 202.1 (2010) ▴ 16-24.

- Weber, Charles A. John R. Current, and W. C. Benton. “Vendor selection criteria and methods.” _European journal of operational research_ 50.1 (1991) ▴ 2-18.

- Dulmin, Riccardo, and Valeria Mininno. “Supplier selection using a multi-criteria decision aid method.” _Journal of purchasing and supply management_ 9.4 (2003) ▴ 177-187.

- Omkarprasad, S. and Sushil Kumar. “AHP in supplier selection.” _Journal of materials processing technology_ 180.1-3 (2006) ▴ 1-6.

![Two intersecting technical arms, one opaque metallic and one transparent blue with internal glowing patterns, pivot around a central hub. This symbolizes a Principal's RFQ protocol engine, enabling high-fidelity execution and price discovery for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-grade-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine.jpg)

## Reflection

![Abstract visualization of institutional RFQ protocol for digital asset derivatives. Translucent layers symbolize dark liquidity pools within complex market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine-6.jpg)

## The Weighting System as a Corporate Mirror

Ultimately, the system an organization builds to weight its RFP criteria serves as a mirror. It reflects not only the stated strategic objectives but also the underlying cultural priorities and the institution’s capacity for disciplined, analytical thought. A meticulously crafted weighting model, born from cross-functional collaboration and grounded in a robust methodology, signals a mature organization that understands its own definition of value. Conversely, an ad-hoc or poorly defined weighting process reveals an organization prone to reactive decision-making, where strategic intent is easily derailed by short-term pressures or internal politics.

Contemplating the framework presented here should prompt a deeper inquiry. Does your organization’s current process for determining these critical weights withstand scrutiny? Is it a true system, with defined inputs, a logical process, and a consistent output, or is it a series of disconnected activities? The journey toward a more systematic approach is an investment in decision quality.

It builds an operational capability that extends far beyond any single procurement, creating a repeatable, defensible, and intelligent method for allocating resources and selecting partners. The weights on the scorecard are more than just numbers; they are the encoded DNA of your organization’s strategic priorities.

![A sleek, multi-layered institutional crypto derivatives platform interface, featuring a transparent intelligence layer for real-time market microstructure analysis. Buttons signify RFQ protocol initiation for block trades, enabling high-fidelity execution and optimal price discovery within a robust Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-crypto-derivatives-os-precision-execution-rfq-protocol-intelligence-layer.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/value-model/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A teal-blue textured sphere, signifying a unique RFQ inquiry or private quotation, precisely mounts on a metallic, institutional-grade base. Integrated into a Prime RFQ framework, it illustrates high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement for digital asset derivatives within market microstructure, ensuring capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-prime-os-execution-1.jpg)

## Value Model

Meaning ▴ A Value Model constitutes a quantitative framework designed to systematically assess the intrinsic or relative worth of a digital asset or derivative instrument. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-market-makers-inventory-position-influence-the-quotes-it-provides-to-clients/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, precision-engineered device with a split-screen interface displaying implied volatility and price discovery data for digital asset derivatives. This institutional grade module optimizes RFQ protocols, ensuring high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency within market microstructure for multi-leg spreads](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-module.jpg)

## Structured Weighting Methodology Provides

A market maker's inventory dictates its quotes by systematically skewing prices to offload risk and steer its position back to neutral. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-simple-scoring-and-weighted-scoring-in-an-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, abstract system interface with a central spherical lens representing real-time Price Discovery and Implied Volatility analysis for institutional Digital Asset Derivatives. Its precise contours signify High-Fidelity Execution and robust RFQ protocol orchestration, managing latent liquidity and minimizing slippage for optimized Alpha Generation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-via-optimized-rfq-protocols-enhancing-market-microstructure.jpg)

## Scoring Model

Simple scoring offers operational ease; weighted scoring provides strategic precision by prioritizing key criteria. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-sa-ccr-improve-upon-the-current-exposure-methodology/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sophisticated, multi-layered trading interface, embodying an Execution Management System EMS, showcases institutional-grade digital asset derivatives execution. Its sleek design implies high-fidelity execution and low-latency processing for RFQ protocols, enabling price discovery and managing multi-leg spreads with capital efficiency across diverse liquidity pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-platform-market-microstructure.jpg)

## Weighting Methodology

SA-CCR upgrades the prior method with a risk-sensitive system that rewards granular hedging and collateralization for capital efficiency. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-criteria/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A dark, articulated multi-leg spread structure crosses a simpler underlying asset bar on a teal Prime RFQ platform. This visualizes institutional digital asset derivatives execution, leveraging high-fidelity RFQ protocols for optimal capital efficiency and precise price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-prime-os-execution.jpg)

## Rfp Criteria

Meaning ▴ RFP Criteria represent the meticulously defined quantitative and qualitative specifications issued by an institutional principal to evaluate potential counterparties or technology solutions for digital asset derivatives trading, establishing the foundational parameters for competitive assessment and strategic alignment. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/analytic-hierarchy-process/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precision digital token, subtly green with a '0' marker, meticulously engages a sleek, white institutional-grade platform. This symbolizes secure RFQ protocol initiation for high-fidelity execution of complex multi-leg spread strategies, optimizing portfolio margin and capital efficiency within a Principal's Crypto Derivatives OS](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-platform-secure-rfq-protocol-initiation-for-optimal-block-trade-execution.jpg)

## Analytic Hierarchy Process

Meaning ▴ The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) constitutes a structured methodology for organizing and analyzing complex decision problems, particularly those involving multiple, often conflicting, criteria and subjective judgments. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/ahp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Stacked, glossy modular components depict an institutional-grade Digital Asset Derivatives platform. Layers signify RFQ protocol orchestration, high-fidelity execution, and liquidity aggregation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/layered-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-stack-for-prime-brokerage.jpg)

## Ahp

Meaning ▴ The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) constitutes a structured decision-making framework, systematically organizing complex problems into a hierarchical structure of goals, criteria, and alternatives. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost-of-ownership/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![An abstract visualization of a sophisticated institutional digital asset derivatives trading system. Intersecting transparent layers depict dynamic market microstructure, high-fidelity execution pathways, and liquidity aggregation for RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution.jpg)

## Total Cost of Ownership

Meaning ▴ Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) represents a comprehensive financial estimate encompassing all direct and indirect expenditures associated with an asset or system throughout its entire operational lifecycle. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/strategic-sourcing/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A multi-faceted digital asset derivative, precisely calibrated on a sophisticated circular mechanism. This represents a Prime Brokerage's robust RFQ protocol for high-fidelity execution of multi-leg spreads, ensuring optimal price discovery and minimal slippage within complex market microstructure, critical for alpha generation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-precision-2.jpg)

## Strategic Sourcing

Meaning ▴ Strategic Sourcing, within the domain of institutional digital asset derivatives, denotes a disciplined, systematic methodology for identifying, evaluating, and engaging with external providers of critical services and infrastructure. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-structure-an-rfp-evaluation-matrix-for-objective-vendor-comparison/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precision optical component stands on a dark, reflective surface, symbolizing a Price Discovery engine for Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives. This Crypto Derivatives OS element enables High-Fidelity Execution through advanced Algorithmic Trading and Multi-Leg Spread capabilities, optimizing Market Microstructure for RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-optimal-execution-system-microstructure.jpg)

## Pairwise Comparison Matrix

An RFP evaluation matrix is a weighted scoring system that translates complex vendor proposals into an objective, data-driven comparison. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-scoring/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Intersecting muted geometric planes, with a central glossy blue sphere. This abstract visualizes market microstructure for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-5.jpg)

## Rfp Scoring

Meaning ▴ RFP Scoring defines the structured, quantitative methodology employed to evaluate and rank vendor proposals received in response to a Request for Proposal, particularly for complex technology and service procurements within institutional digital asset derivatives. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/pairwise-comparison/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A central control knob on a metallic platform, bisected by sharp reflective lines, embodies an institutional RFQ protocol. This depicts intricate market microstructure, enabling high-fidelity execution, precise price discovery for multi-leg options, and robust Prime RFQ deployment, optimizing latent liquidity across digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-rfq-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-engine-core-microstructure.jpg)

## Pairwise Comparison

Meaning ▴ Pairwise Comparison is a systematic method for evaluating entities by comparing them two at a time, across a defined set of criteria, to establish a relative preference or value. </a>

**Tags:** [Procurement Strategy](https://options.greeks.live/area/procurement-strategy/), [Value Model](https://options.greeks.live/area/value-model/), [Strategic Sourcing](https://options.greeks.live/area/strategic-sourcing/), [RFP Scoring](https://options.greeks.live/area/rfp-scoring/), [Vendor Evaluation](https://options.greeks.live/area/vendor-evaluation/), [RFP Criteria](https://options.greeks.live/area/rfp-criteria/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [How Should the Weighting of RFP Criteria Change Based on Different Corporate Strategies like Innovation versus Cost Leadership?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-should-the-weighting-of-rfp-criteria-change-based-on-different-corporate-strategies-like-innovation-versus-cost-leadership/)
![Angular, transparent forms in teal, clear, and beige dynamically intersect, embodying a multi-leg spread within an RFQ protocol. This depicts aggregated inquiry for institutional liquidity, enabling precise price discovery and atomic settlement of digital asset derivatives, optimizing market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/multi-leg-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-aggregation-dynamics.jpg)

RFP weighting must dynamically mirror corporate strategy, prioritizing cost for efficiency and innovation for long-term value creation.

- 
### [How Do You Effectively Weight RFP Evaluation Criteria to Reflect Strategic Priorities?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-effectively-weight-rfp-evaluation-criteria-to-reflect-strategic-priorities/)
![Two sleek, metallic, and cream-colored cylindrical modules with dark, reflective spherical optical units, resembling advanced Prime RFQ components for high-fidelity execution. Sharp, reflective wing-like structures suggest smart order routing and capital efficiency in digital asset derivatives trading, enabling price discovery through RFQ protocols for block trade liquidity.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-prime-os-execution.jpg)

Weighting RFP criteria is the engineering of a decision system that translates strategic intent into a quantifiable, defensible procurement outcome.

- 
### [What Is the Most Effective Method for Weighting Rfp Evaluation Criteria to Reflect Strategic Priorities?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-most-effective-method-for-weighting-rfp-evaluation-criteria-to-reflect-strategic-priorities/)
![Polished metallic pipes intersect via robust fasteners, set against a dark background. This symbolizes intricate Market Microstructure, RFQ Protocols, and Multi-Leg Spread execution. It highlights High-Fidelity Execution, Atomic Settlement, and Capital Efficiency within a Principal's Operational Framework for Digital Asset Derivatives.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-metallic-nodes-illustrating-rfq-protocols-for-multi-leg-digital-asset-derivatives-institutional-execution.jpg)

A weighted scoring model is the most effective method for translating strategic priorities into a quantitative, defensible RFP decision.

- 
### [How Can an Organization Effectively Weight Rfp Scoring Criteria to Reflect Its Strategic Priorities?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-effectively-weight-rfp-scoring-criteria-to-reflect-its-strategic-priorities/)
![Robust metallic structures, one blue-tinted, one teal, intersect, covered in granular water droplets. This depicts a principal's institutional RFQ framework facilitating multi-leg spread execution, aggregating deep liquidity pools for optimal price discovery and high-fidelity atomic settlement of digital asset derivatives for enhanced capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-optimized-for-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

An organization weights RFP criteria by translating strategic goals into a quantitative evaluation architecture to ensure vendor selection drives long-term value.

- 
### [How Should an Rfp Scoring Matrix Account for Qualitative Factors like Vendor Cultural Fit and Partnership Potential?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-should-an-rfp-scoring-matrix-account-for-qualitative-factors-like-vendor-cultural-fit-and-partnership-potential/)
![A dark, textured module with a glossy top and silver button, featuring active RFQ protocol status indicators. This represents a Principal's operational framework for high-fidelity execution of institutional digital asset derivatives, optimizing atomic settlement and capital efficiency within market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-interface-1.jpg)

A structured RFP matrix quantifies qualitative factors by deconstructing them into weighted, evidence-based indicators.

- 
### [What Is the Optimal Weight for Price in a Complex Technology Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-optimal-weight-for-price-in-a-complex-technology-rfp/)
![A beige spool feeds dark, reflective material into an advanced processing unit, illuminated by a vibrant blue light. This depicts high-fidelity execution of institutional digital asset derivatives through a Prime RFQ, enabling precise price discovery for aggregated RFQ inquiries within complex market microstructure, ensuring atomic settlement.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-prime-os-3.jpg)

The optimal price weight in a tech RFP is a dynamic calibration that subordinates initial cost to the systemic value of quality and risk.

- 
### [How Should an Organization Adapt Rfp Weighting Criteria for Technology versus Service Procurements?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-should-an-organization-adapt-rfp-weighting-criteria-for-technology-versus-service-procurements/)
![Abstract layers visualize institutional digital asset derivatives market microstructure. Teal dome signifies optimal price discovery, high-fidelity execution. Dark rings represent dynamic RFQ protocols and multi-leg spread execution. Robust cream layer underscores prime brokerage liquidity and capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-protocol-layers-and-market-microstructure-optimization.jpg)

Adapting RFP weights for technology versus services requires shifting focus from product specifications to provider capability and process maturity.

- 
### [What Are the Best Methods to Assign Weights to Rfp Evaluation Criteria?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-best-methods-to-assign-weights-to-rfp-evaluation-criteria/)
![A modular, institutional-grade device with a central data aggregation interface and metallic spigot. This Prime RFQ represents a robust RFQ protocol engine, enabling high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives, optimizing capital efficiency and best execution.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/principals-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-for-optimized-rfq-protocol-best-execution-system.jpg)

Assigning weights to RFP criteria is a strategic imperative for objective, data-driven vendor selection.

- 
### [What Are the Most Common Mistakes to Avoid When Weighting Rfp Criteria?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-mistakes-to-avoid-when-weighting-rfp-criteria/)
![A precision-engineered interface for institutional digital asset derivatives. A circular system component, perhaps an Execution Management System EMS module, connects via a multi-faceted Request for Quote RFQ protocol bridge to a distinct teal capsule, symbolizing a bespoke block trade. This depicts high-fidelity execution, optimizing market microstructure within a Principal's operational framework for atomic settlement.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-interface-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-request-for-quote-protocol-high-fidelity-execution-within-principal-operating-system.jpg)

The most common mistakes in weighting RFP criteria stem from a failure to architect a decision system that aligns with strategic intent.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "How Should an Organization Determine the Appropriate Weights for Different RFP Scoring Criteria?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-should-an-organization-determine-the-appropriate-weights-for-different-rfp-scoring-criteria/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-should-an-organization-determine-the-appropriate-weights-for-different-rfp-scoring-criteria/"
    },
    "headline": "How Should an Organization Determine the Appropriate Weights for Different RFP Scoring Criteria? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "An organization determines RFP scoring weights by systemically translating strategic priorities into a quantifiable value model. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-should-an-organization-determine-the-appropriate-weights-for-different-rfp-scoring-criteria/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-10T00:17:59+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-08-10T00:18:15+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution-5.jpg",
        "caption": "A sophisticated, white, semi-spherical housing, emblematic of a Prime RFQ or Execution Management System EMS, reveals internal mechanisms for smart order routing and pre-trade analytics. Adjacent, a flawless, reflective blue sphere represents a high-value digital asset derivative, like Bitcoin options, achieving best execution through private quotation and aggregated inquiry RFQ protocols. This imagery underscores capital efficiency and minimized slippage in institutional-grade dark pool environments, ensuring precise price discovery and robust liquidity provision."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "AHP",
        "Analytic Hierarchy Process",
        "Multi-Criteria Decision Making",
        "Pairwise Comparison",
        "Procurement Strategy",
        "RFP Criteria",
        "RFP Scoring",
        "Strategic Sourcing",
        "Supplier Selection",
        "Total Cost of Ownership",
        "Value Model",
        "Vendor Evaluation",
        "Weighted Scoring"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/how-should-an-organization-determine-the-appropriate-weights-for-different-rfp-scoring-criteria/
