# How Should an Organization Properly Weight Cost versus Technical Merit in an Rfp? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-07
**Categories:** Question

---

![Abstract forms depict interconnected institutional liquidity pools and intricate market microstructure. Sharp algorithmic execution paths traverse smooth aggregated inquiry surfaces, symbolizing high-fidelity execution within a Principal's operational framework](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-prime-os-1.jpg)

![Central institutional Prime RFQ, a segmented sphere, anchors digital asset derivatives liquidity. Intersecting beams signify high-fidelity RFQ protocols for multi-leg spread execution, price discovery, and counterparty risk mitigation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-cross-asset-rfq-execution-hub.jpg)

## Concept

![A transparent, multi-faceted component, indicative of an RFQ engine's intricate market microstructure logic, emerges from complex FIX Protocol connectivity. Its sharp edges signify high-fidelity execution and price discovery precision for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimized-for-best-execution.jpg)

## The Value Equation in Procurement

The decision matrix for a Request for Proposal (RFP) represents a foundational challenge in organizational strategy. It is the point where abstract goals are translated into a binding partnership. The central tension within this process is the calibration between the price of a proposed solution and its underlying technical quality. An improper calibration leads to predictable consequences ▴ selecting a low-cost provider who fails to deliver on critical performance metrics or, conversely, over-investing in a technically superior system whose advanced capabilities are never fully utilized, resulting in a diminished return on investment.

The objective is to architect a selection process that quantifies and balances these two domains, ensuring the final decision aligns with the organization’s comprehensive strategic intent. This process moves beyond simple cost-benefit analysis into a domain of value optimization, where “value” is a function of performance, long-term viability, and [total cost of ownership](https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost-of-ownership/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), not just the initial procurement price.

At its core, the weighting of cost against [technical merit](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-merit-management-decision-affect-safe-harbor-defenses/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) is an exercise in risk management. A heavy bias towards cost may introduce risks related to performance, reliability, and scalability. A vendor might meet the minimum specified requirements at an attractive price point, but lack the technical depth or robust infrastructure to adapt to future challenges or scale with the organization’s growth.

Conversely, an overwhelming focus on technical features can introduce financial risk, straining budgets and potentially diverting capital from other critical initiatives. The ideal weighting is therefore unique to each procurement action and must be derived from a deep understanding of the project’s specific requirements, the organization’s tolerance for different types of risk, and the long-term strategic importance of the acquisition.

> A successful RFP evaluation framework treats cost as one of several critical performance indicators, not as the primary determinant of value.

This requires a systemic view where the RFP is a mechanism for acquiring a capability, a partner, and a set of long-term outcomes. The evaluation criteria, and their respective weights, become the encoded logic of this system. A transparent framework, communicated clearly within the RFP document, allows potential vendors to understand the organization’s priorities and structure their proposals accordingly.

This clarity enhances the quality of submissions, as vendors can focus their efforts on demonstrating value in the areas that matter most to the procuring entity. The process becomes a structured dialogue about value, with the weighting system serving as the common language for that conversation.

![An exposed institutional digital asset derivatives engine reveals its market microstructure. The polished disc represents a liquidity pool for price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system.jpg)

![A sleek metallic device with a central translucent sphere and dual sharp probes. This symbolizes an institutional-grade intelligence layer, driving high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-platform-precision.jpg)

## Strategy

![Two sleek, pointed objects intersect centrally, forming an 'X' against a dual-tone black and teal background. This embodies the high-fidelity execution of institutional digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols, facilitating optimal price discovery and efficient cross-asset trading within a robust Prime RFQ, minimizing slippage and adverse selection](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-prime-os-microstructure.jpg)

## Frameworks for Rational Decision Making

Selecting an appropriate strategy for weighting cost and technical merit is the most critical strategic decision in the RFP process. The chosen framework dictates the logic of the evaluation and directly shapes the outcome. Organizations must select a model that reflects the specific nature of the procurement. For complex services or systems where quality and performance are paramount, a trade-off or “[Best Value](https://prime.greeks.live/area/best-value/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)” approach is often superior.

For more commoditized acquisitions, a simpler model may be sufficient. The key is to make a conscious, defensible choice of methodology before the RFP is issued and to adhere to it rigorously.

![Intersecting muted geometric planes, with a central glossy blue sphere. This abstract visualizes market microstructure for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-microstructure-5.jpg)

## Comparative Analysis of Evaluation Models

Three primary models dominate the landscape of RFP evaluation ▴ [Lowest Price Technically Acceptable](https://prime.greeks.live/area/lowest-price-technically-acceptable/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (LPTA), Price-per-Point, and [Best Value Trade-Off](https://prime.greeks.live/area/best-value-trade-off/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). Each offers a different philosophical approach to balancing cost and quality, with distinct advantages and disadvantages.

- **[Lowest Price](https://prime.greeks.live/question/can-a-firm-be-compliant-if-it-never-uses-the-venue-with-the-lowest-commission-fee/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) [Technically Acceptable](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-use-of-minimum-acceptable-quantity-maq-defend-against-predatory-trading-in-dark-venues/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (LPTA)** ▴ This model is the most straightforward. Technical proposals are first evaluated on a pass/fail basis against a set of minimum requirements. Any proposal that meets all mandatory technical criteria is deemed “technically acceptable.” The contract is then awarded to the technically acceptable bidder with the lowest price. This method is most suitable for acquisitions where the requirements are well-defined, the risk of poor performance is low, and the goods or services are commoditized.

- **Price-per-Point (or Price/Quality Ratio)** ▴ This method attempts to create a more direct quantitative link between cost and technical merit. Technical proposals are scored based on a set of weighted criteria. The total price is then divided by the total [technical score](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-counterparty-performance-score-differ-from-a-traditional-credit-score/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) to yield a “cost per quality point.” The award goes to the bidder with the lowest cost per point. This model introduces more nuance than [LPTA](https://prime.greeks.live/area/lpta/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), allowing for differentiation among technically superior proposals, but it inherently weights cost and technical merit roughly equally (a 50/50 split), which may not be appropriate for all procurements.

- **Best [Value Trade-Off](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-enterprise-value-and-equity-value-in-a-valuation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)** ▴ This is the most flexible and often the most complex model. It assigns separate weights to the [technical evaluation](https://prime.greeks.live/area/technical-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) and the cost proposal, such as a 70% weight for the technical score and a 30% weight for the cost score. This allows the organization to explicitly state the relative importance of quality versus price. The final selection is made by calculating a total weighted score for each proposal. This method is ideal for complex projects, such as technology implementations or professional services, where technical superiority can provide significant long-term benefits that justify a higher initial cost.

![A precision metallic mechanism with radiating blades and blue accents, representing an institutional-grade Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives. It signifies high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols, leveraging dark liquidity and smart order routing within market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-engine.jpg)

## Strategic Model Selection

The choice of model should be driven by a strategic assessment of the procurement’s goals. An organization acquiring standard office supplies would find the LPTA model efficient and effective. However, an organization seeking a partner to develop a critical enterprise software application would find the LPTA model dangerously simplistic. For the software procurement, the ability to innovate, the quality of the development team, and the robustness of the proposed architecture are far more significant than a marginal difference in price.

A Best Value model, with a heavy weighting on technical factors (e.g. 70/30 or even 80/20), would be the appropriate strategic choice, as it aligns the evaluation logic with the long-term success of the project.

> The weighting assigned to cost is a direct statement of the organization’s tolerance for technical risk.

The table below provides a comparative overview of these strategic frameworks, outlining their mechanics, ideal use cases, and potential pitfalls. This systemic comparison allows an organization to align its [procurement strategy](https://prime.greeks.live/area/procurement-strategy/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) with the specific risk profile and value drivers of each RFP.

### Table 1 ▴ Comparison of RFP Evaluation Models

| Evaluation Model | Mechanism | Ideal Use Case | Primary Risk |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) | Technical proposals receive a pass/fail score. The award is made to the lowest-priced proposal among those that pass. | Commoditized goods; well-defined requirements; low performance risk (e.g. office supplies, standard hardware). | Incentivizes bidders to offer the bare minimum required, potentially leading to poor quality and high long-term costs. |
| Price-per-Point | A ratio is calculated by dividing the total price by the total technical score. The award goes to the proposal with the lowest ratio. | Situations requiring a balance between cost and quality, but where an explicit weighting is not desired (e.g. routine services). | The implicit 50/50 weighting between cost and technical merit may not align with the project’s strategic importance. |
| Best Value Trade-Off | Technical and cost proposals are scored separately. The scores are multiplied by pre-determined weights (e.g. Technical 70%, Cost 30%) and combined. | Complex projects; high-value services; technology procurement; situations where quality and performance are critical. | Requires a robust and defensible scoring methodology to justify awarding to a higher-priced bidder. Can be more complex to manage. |

![A high-precision, dark metallic circular mechanism, representing an institutional-grade RFQ engine. Illuminated segments denote dynamic price discovery and multi-leg spread execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine-7.jpg)

![Angular translucent teal structures intersect on a smooth base, reflecting light against a deep blue sphere. This embodies RFQ Protocol architecture, symbolizing High-Fidelity Execution for Digital Asset Derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/dynamic-rfq-protocol-architecture-optimizing-digital-asset-derivative-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## Execution

![Precisely aligned forms depict an institutional trading system's RFQ protocol interface. Circular elements symbolize market data feeds and price discovery for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-interface-optimization.jpg)

## A System for Quantifiable Evaluation

The execution of a weighted evaluation strategy requires a disciplined, multi-stage process. It begins with the deconstruction of technical merit into a hierarchy of measurable criteria and culminates in the mathematical synthesis of technical and cost scores into a final, defensible ranking. This operational playbook ensures the evaluation process is transparent, objective, and aligned with the strategic framework chosen in the preceding phase.

![A sharp, metallic instrument precisely engages a textured, grey object. This symbolizes High-Fidelity Execution within institutional RFQ protocols for Digital Asset Derivatives, visualizing precise Price Discovery, minimizing Slippage, and optimizing Capital Efficiency via Prime RFQ for Best Execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-protocols-precision-execution-prime-os-liquidity.jpg)

## The Operational Playbook for Weighted Scoring

Implementing a Best Value Trade-Off model, for instance with a 70/30 technical/cost split, involves a precise sequence of actions. This process transforms subjective assessments into a structured, quantitative decision-making framework.

- **Deconstruct Technical Merit** ▴ The first step is to break down the abstract concept of “technical merit” into a set of specific, weighted evaluation criteria. These criteria must be clearly defined in the RFP document. For a software development RFP, these might include the vendor’s understanding of the requirements, the qualifications of the proposed project team, and the quality of their proposed methodology.

- **Develop The [Scoring Rubric](https://prime.greeks.live/area/scoring-rubric/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)** ▴ For each technical criterion, a detailed scoring rubric must be created. This rubric defines what constitutes an “Unacceptable,” “Marginal,” “Acceptable,” “Good,” or “Excellent” rating, assigning numerical scores to each level (e.g. 0, 1, 3, 4, 5). This minimizes scorer subjectivity.

- **Conduct Technical Evaluation** ▴ The evaluation committee scores each proposal against the rubric, independent of any cost information. Each scorer’s ratings are documented, and a consensus score for each criterion is reached.

- **Calculate The Weighted Technical Score** ▴ The consensus score for each criterion is multiplied by its assigned weight. These weighted scores are then summed to produce a total raw technical score for each proposal.

- **Normalize And Score Cost** ▴ Cost proposals are opened only after the technical evaluation is complete. The lowest proposed price receives the maximum available cost points (in a 70/30 model, this would be 30 points). Other, higher-priced proposals receive a lower score based on a formula. A common formula is ▴ Cost Score = (Lowest Price / This Proposer’s Price) Maximum Cost Points.

- **Synthesize The Final Score** ▴ The final step is to combine the total technical score and the final cost score for each vendor to arrive at a total overall score. The vendor with the highest total score represents the best value to the organization.

![A dark, articulated multi-leg spread structure crosses a simpler underlying asset bar on a teal Prime RFQ platform. This visualizes institutional digital asset derivatives execution, leveraging high-fidelity RFQ protocols for optimal capital efficiency and precise price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-prime-os-execution.jpg)

## Quantitative Modeling in Practice

To illustrate the execution, consider an RFP for a new CRM system, using a 70/30 weighting. The technical merit is worth a maximum of 70 points, and cost is worth a maximum of 30 points. The technical criteria have been deconstructed and weighted as shown in the table below.

### Table 2 ▴ Weighted Technical Scoring Rubric

| Technical Criterion | Weight (%) | Max Points | Scoring Scale (0-5) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Technical Solution & Architecture | 30% | 21 | 0=Unacceptable, 5=Excellent |
| Implementation Plan & Methodology | 25% | 17.5 | 0=Unacceptable, 5=Excellent |
| Vendor Experience & Past Performance | 20% | 14 | 0=Unacceptable, 5=Excellent |
| Key Personnel Qualifications | 15% | 10.5 | 0=Unacceptable, 5=Excellent |
| Support & Maintenance Plan | 10% | 7 | 0=Unacceptable, 5=Excellent |

After the evaluation committee completes its scoring, three vendors have the following raw technical scores and proposed prices.

- **Vendor A** ▴ Raw Technical Score = 4.5/5, Price = $1,200,000

- **Vendor B** ▴ Raw Technical Score = 3.8/5, Price = $950,000

- **Vendor C** ▴ Raw Technical Score = 4.2/5, Price = $1,100,000

The final calculation synthesizes these inputs. Vendor B has the lowest price and thus receives the full 30 cost points. The other vendors’ cost scores are calculated relative to this low price. The technical scores are calculated by multiplying the raw score by the maximum 70 points.

The final result reveals the best value, which in this case is Vendor A, despite its higher price tag. This demonstrates a system where superior technical capability can quantitatively overcome a cost disadvantage, provided the weighting is structured to reflect that strategic priority. The detailed breakdown shows how CloudCRM, in a similar scenario, won due to its superior capabilities outweighing the price premium.

![A precise stack of multi-layered circular components visually representing a sophisticated Principal Digital Asset RFQ framework. Each distinct layer signifies a critical component within market microstructure for high-fidelity execution of institutional digital asset derivatives, embodying liquidity aggregation across dark pools, enabling private quotation and atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-digital-asset-rfq-protocol-layers-for-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

## Predictive Scenario Analysis

An organization, a mid-sized logistics firm named “SwiftHaul,” decides to issue an RFP for a comprehensive transportation management system (TMS). The executive team is split. The CFO advocates for a cost-centric approach to preserve capital, while the COO insists that technical capability is paramount for achieving the long-term efficiency gains necessary to remain competitive. After considerable debate, they agree on a Best Value Trade-Off model, establishing a 60/40 weighting in favor of technical merit.

This decision itself is a critical piece of corporate strategy, signaling that while budget is a major concern, the operational effectiveness of the system is the primary driver for the investment. The RFP is drafted with five core technical evaluation criteria ▴ Core Functionality (25%), System Integration Capabilities (20%), User Interface and Experience (15%), Vendor Support and SLA (10%), and Implementation Plan (10%).

Three vendors submit proposals ▴ “LogiSoft,” “ConnectCargo,” and “RouteOptima.” LogiSoft is a large, established player with a reputation for robust but complex systems, and their bid comes in at $1.5 million. ConnectCargo is a newer, more agile firm with a highly intuitive, modern platform, bidding $1.2 million. RouteOptima is a budget provider, offering a basic system that meets the minimum requirements for $900,000. The evaluation committee, composed of IT, operations, and finance personnel, is calibrated on the scoring rubric and begins the technical evaluation without seeing the prices.

They find that LogiSoft’s system is powerful but scores lower on the user interface, as its complexity would require extensive training. ConnectCargo’s proposal is impressive, demonstrating deep understanding of SwiftHaul’s workflow and showcasing a seamless integration plan with their existing warehouse management system. RouteOptima’s proposal is deemed technically acceptable but offers no innovative features and presents a generic implementation plan. After deliberation, the consensus technical scores are ▴ LogiSoft (88/100), ConnectCargo (95/100), and RouteOptima (72/100).

Now, the cost proposals are opened. RouteOptima, with the lowest price of $900,000, receives the maximum 40 cost points. The other scores are calculated proportionally. ConnectCargo’s cost score is ($900,000 / $1,200,000) 40 = 30 points.

LogiSoft’s cost score is ($900,000 / $1,500,000) 40 = 24 points. The final scores are synthesized. RouteOptima’s total score is (72 0.60) + 40 = 43.2 + 40 = 83.2. LogiSoft’s total score is (88 0.60) + 24 = 52.8 + 24 = 76.8.

ConnectCargo’s total score is (95 0.60) + 30 = 57 + 30 = 87.0. The result is clear. ConnectCargo, despite being 33% more expensive than the lowest bidder, emerges as the best value. The 60/40 weighting allowed their significant technical superiority to overcome the cost difference.

Had the CFO’s preference for a cost-centric model (e.g. a 30/70 weighting) been adopted, RouteOptima would have won, and SwiftHaul would have been locked into a system that limited its long-term growth. The structured process provided a defensible, data-driven rationale for making a significant capital investment that aligned with the company’s strategic operational goals over its short-term financial constraints.

![An abstract metallic circular interface with intricate patterns visualizes an institutional grade RFQ protocol for block trade execution. A central pivot holds a golden pointer with a transparent liquidity pool sphere and a blue pointer, depicting market microstructure optimization and high-fidelity execution for multi-leg spread price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-market-microstructure-optimization.jpg)

## References

- Mak, Jonathan. “INCREASED TRANSPARENCY IN BASES OF SELECTION AND AWARD DECISIONS.” International Public Procurement Conference, 2010.

- Bergman, M. A. and S. Lundberg. “Tender evaluation and supplier selection in public procurement.” _Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management_, vol. 19, no. 2, 2013, pp. 73-83.

- UNICEF. “Request for Proposal Evaluation Weighting Criteria.” LRPS-2022-9176880, 2022.

- Cook, W. D. and M. Kress. “A data envelopment analysis model for subcontractor selection.” _Journal of the Operational Research Society_, vol. 50, no. 1, 1999, pp. 45-51.

- Dobler, Donald W. and David N. Burt. _Purchasing and Supply Management ▴ Text and Cases_. McGraw-Hill, 1996.

- Ghodsypour, S. H. and C. O’Brien. “A decision support system for supplier selection using an integrated analytic hierarchy process and linear programming.” _International Journal of Production Economics_, vol. 56-57, 1998, pp. 199-212.

- Ho, William, et al. “A review of the literature on multi-criteria decision making for supplier evaluation and selection.” _International Journal of Production Research_, vol. 48, no. 1, 2010, pp. 11-39.

![A transparent glass sphere rests precisely on a metallic rod, connecting a grey structural element and a dark teal engineered module with a clear lens. This symbolizes atomic settlement of digital asset derivatives via private quotation within a Prime RFQ, showcasing high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency for RFQ protocols and liquidity aggregation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/architecting-high-fidelity-execution-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-and-systemic-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## Reflection

![A sleek, light interface, a Principal's Prime RFQ, overlays a dark, intricate market microstructure. This represents institutional-grade digital asset derivatives trading, showcasing high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-prime-os-execution-system.jpg)

## The Weighting as a Statement of Identity

Ultimately, the formula an organization chooses to weigh cost against technical merit is a reflection of its own identity. It is a quantitative expression of its priorities, its appetite for risk, and its definition of value. A framework heavily skewed towards cost describes an organization focused on immediate fiscal efficiency, willing to accept potential performance trade-offs. A framework that heavily favors technical quality describes an organization that views procurement as a long-term investment in capability, willing to allocate premium capital to secure a strategic advantage.

There is no universally correct weighting. The process of defining these criteria, debating their importance, and codifying them into a mathematical formula forces an institution to have a critical internal conversation about what it truly values and how it intends to achieve its mission. The final number is the conclusion of that dialogue, a concise summary of a complex strategic choice.

![A segmented circular diagram, split diagonally. Its core, with blue rings, represents the Prime RFQ Intelligence Layer driving High-Fidelity Execution for Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/high-speed-prime-os-rfq-digital-asset-derivatives-trade-execution.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost-of-ownership/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Interlocking transparent and opaque geometric planes on a dark surface. This abstract form visually articulates the intricate Market Microstructure of Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives, embodying High-Fidelity Execution through advanced RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/geometric-abstraction-of-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-market-microstructure-driving-high-fidelity-execution-via-principal-rfq-protocols-and-optimal-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## Total Cost of Ownership

Meaning ▴ Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) is a comprehensive financial metric that quantifies the direct and indirect costs associated with acquiring, operating, and maintaining a product or system throughout its entire lifecycle. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-merit-management-decision-affect-safe-harbor-defenses/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Intersecting transparent and opaque geometric planes, symbolizing the intricate market microstructure of institutional digital asset derivatives. Visualizes high-fidelity execution and price discovery via RFQ protocols, demonstrating multi-leg spread strategies and dark liquidity for capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-market-microstructure-architecture.jpg)

## Technical Merit

The Merit Management decision mandates that safe harbor analysis pierce through transactional form to assess the substance of the ultimate transfer. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/best-value/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sophisticated proprietary system module featuring precision-engineered components, symbolizing an institutional-grade Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives. Its intricate design represents market microstructure analysis, RFQ protocol integration, and high-fidelity execution capabilities, optimizing liquidity aggregation and price discovery for block trades within a multi-leg spread environment](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-proprietary-architecture-driving-high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-via-rfq-protocols-and-optimized-market-microstructure-dynamics.jpg)

## Best Value

Meaning ▴ Best Value, in the context of crypto trading and institutional Request for Quote (RFQ) processes, represents the optimal combination of execution price, speed, certainty of fill, and overall transaction cost for an order. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/lowest-price-technically-acceptable/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precise lens-like module, symbolizing high-fidelity execution and market microstructure insight, rests on a sharp blade, representing optimal smart order routing. Curved surfaces depict distinct liquidity pools within an institutional-grade Prime RFQ, enabling efficient RFQ for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-via-rfq-protocols.jpg)

## Lowest Price Technically Acceptable

Meaning ▴ Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) is a procurement evaluation methodology where bids are first assessed for technical acceptability against predefined requirements, and among those deemed acceptable, the contract is awarded to the offeror proposing the lowest price. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/best-value-trade-off/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A metallic cylindrical component, suggesting robust Prime RFQ infrastructure, interacts with a luminous teal-blue disc representing a dynamic liquidity pool for digital asset derivatives. A precise golden bar diagonally traverses, symbolizing an RFQ-driven block trade path, enabling high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement within complex market microstructure for institutional grade operations](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-execution-protocols-navigating-digital-asset-derivatives-market-microstructure-for-optimal-block-trade-liquidity.jpg)

## Best Value Trade-Off

Meaning ▴ In crypto Request for Quotation (RFQ) and institutional options trading, a Best Value Trade-Off represents a strategic decision process where procuring entities evaluate proposals based on a balanced assessment of multiple factors beyond just price. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-use-of-minimum-acceptable-quantity-maq-defend-against-predatory-trading-in-dark-venues/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Engineered components in beige, blue, and metallic tones form a complex, layered structure. This embodies the intricate market microstructure of institutional digital asset derivatives, illustrating a sophisticated RFQ protocol framework for optimizing price discovery, high-fidelity execution, and managing counterparty risk within multi-leg spreads on a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-stack-optimization.jpg)

## Technically Acceptable

MAQ defends against predatory trading by making small, information-seeking probes economically unviable, thus preserving order anonymity. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/can-a-firm-be-compliant-if-it-never-uses-the-venue-with-the-lowest-commission-fee/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract visualization of institutional digital asset RFQ protocols. Intersecting elements symbolize high-fidelity execution slicing dark liquidity pools, facilitating precise price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-protocol-execution-intelligence-layer.jpg)

## Lowest Price

A firm's compliance hinges on a demonstrable, systematic process for achieving the best overall client outcome, not on chasing the lowest fee. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-counterparty-performance-score-differ-from-a-traditional-credit-score/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precision-engineered component, like an RFQ protocol engine, displays a reflective blade and numerical data. It symbolizes high-fidelity execution within market microstructure, driving price discovery, capital efficiency, and algorithmic trading for institutional Digital Asset Derivatives on a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-execution-engine-core-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-price-discovery.jpg)

## Technical Score

A counterparty performance score is a dynamic, multi-factor model of transactional reliability, distinct from a traditional credit score's historical debt focus. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/lpta/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Sleek, domed institutional-grade interface with glowing green and blue indicators highlights active RFQ protocols and price discovery. This signifies high-fidelity execution within a Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives, ensuring real-time liquidity and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-prime-os-execution-interface.jpg)

## Lpta

Meaning ▴ LPTA, an acronym for Lowest Price Technically Acceptable, is a procurement evaluation methodology where bids are first assessed for technical acceptability against predefined criteria, and among all technically compliant proposals, the contract is awarded to the offeror submitting the lowest price. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/technical-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, disc-shaped system, with concentric rings and a central dome, visually represents an advanced Principal's operational framework. It integrates RFQ protocols for institutional digital asset derivatives, facilitating liquidity aggregation, high-fidelity execution, and real-time risk management](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocol-engine-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

## Technical Evaluation

Meaning ▴ Technical evaluation, or technical analysis, is a methodology for analyzing and forecasting the direction of prices through the study of past market data, primarily price and volume. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-difference-between-enterprise-value-and-equity-value-in-a-valuation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A metallic disc, reminiscent of a sophisticated market interface, features two precise pointers radiating from a glowing central hub. This visualizes RFQ protocols driving price discovery within institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-price-discovery.jpg)

## Value Trade-Off

Enterprise Value is the total value of a business's operations, while Equity Value is the residual value belonging to shareholders. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/procurement-strategy/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Translucent circular elements represent distinct institutional liquidity pools and digital asset derivatives. A central arm signifies the Prime RFQ facilitating RFQ-driven price discovery, enabling high-fidelity execution via algorithmic trading, optimizing capital efficiency within complex market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-best-execution-framework.jpg)

## Procurement Strategy

Meaning ▴ Procurement Strategy, in the context of a crypto-centric institution's systems architecture, represents the overarching, long-term plan guiding the acquisition of goods, services, and digital assets necessary for its operational success and competitive advantage. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/scoring-rubric/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A symmetrical, high-tech digital infrastructure depicts an institutional-grade RFQ execution hub. Luminous conduits represent aggregated liquidity for digital asset derivatives, enabling high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-system.jpg)

## Scoring Rubric

Meaning ▴ A Scoring Rubric, within the operational framework of crypto institutional investing, is a precisely structured evaluation tool that delineates clear criteria and corresponding performance levels for rigorously assessing proposals, vendors, or internal projects related to critical digital asset infrastructure, advanced trading systems, or specialized service providers. </a>

**Tags:** [RFP Evaluation](https://options.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation/), [Best Value Procurement](https://options.greeks.live/area/best-value-procurement/), [Best Value Trade-Off](https://options.greeks.live/area/best-value-trade-off/), [Lowest Price Technically Acceptable](https://options.greeks.live/area/lowest-price-technically-acceptable/), [LPTA](https://options.greeks.live/area/lpta/), [Strategic Sourcing](https://options.greeks.live/area/strategic-sourcing/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [How Can an Organization Objectively Weight TCO against Qualitative Factors in an RFP Evaluation?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-objectively-weight-tco-against-qualitative-factors-in-an-rfp-evaluation/)
![An intricate, high-precision mechanism symbolizes an Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives RFQ protocol. Its sleek off-white casing protects the core market microstructure, while the teal-edged component signifies high-fidelity execution and optimal price discovery. A detailed circular dial suggests real-time implied volatility and quantitative analysis for portfolio margin.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-market-microstructure-optimization.jpg)

An organization objectively weights TCO against qualitative factors by architecting a weighted scoring system that reflects its strategic priorities.

- 
### [How Does the Evaluation Criteria in an Rfp Shape Supplier Behavior?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-evaluation-criteria-in-an-rfp-shape-supplier-behavior/)
![Precision-engineered institutional-grade Prime RFQ component, showcasing a reflective sphere and teal control. This symbolizes RFQ protocol mechanics, emphasizing high-fidelity execution, atomic settlement, and capital efficiency in digital asset derivatives market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-precision-execution-system-design.jpg)

RFP evaluation criteria function as a signaling system that directs supplier resources toward the buyer's prioritized definition of value.

- 
### [How Should Evaluation Criteria Weighting Differ between a Product and a Service Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-should-evaluation-criteria-weighting-differ-between-a-product-and-a-service-rfp/)
![A sleek metallic device with a central translucent sphere and dual sharp probes. This symbolizes an institutional-grade intelligence layer, driving high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives. It optimizes RFQ protocols, enabling precise price discovery within complex market microstructure for capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-platform-precision.jpg)

Weighting must pivot from a product's objective performance metrics to a service's subjective provider capabilities.

- 
### [How Can an Organization Effectively Weight Evaluation Criteria for a Complex Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-effectively-weight-evaluation-criteria-for-a-complex-rfp/)
![A central metallic bar, representing an RFQ block trade, pivots through translucent geometric planes symbolizing dynamic liquidity pools and multi-leg spread strategies. This illustrates a Principal's operational framework for high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement within a sophisticated Crypto Derivatives OS, optimizing private quotation workflows.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-facilitating-high-fidelity-price-discovery-and-optimal-capital-efficiency-within-advanced-market-microstructure.jpg)

Effective RFP criteria weighting transforms subjective priorities into a quantifiable, defensible system for optimal vendor selection.

- 
### [What Is the Optimal Price Weighting to Use in a Complex Service Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-optimal-price-weighting-to-use-in-a-complex-service-rfp/)
![Interconnected translucent rings with glowing internal mechanisms symbolize an RFQ protocol engine. This Principal's Operational Framework ensures High-Fidelity Execution and precise Price Discovery for Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives, optimizing Market Microstructure and Capital Efficiency via Atomic Settlement.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

The optimal price weighting in a complex service RFP is a dynamic output of a valuation system designed to reflect strategic priorities.

- 
### [How Do You Create an Effective and Objective Weighted Scoring Rubric for an Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-create-an-effective-and-objective-weighted-scoring-rubric-for-an-rfp/)
![A central engineered mechanism, resembling a Prime RFQ hub, anchors four precision arms. This symbolizes multi-leg spread execution and liquidity pool aggregation for RFQ protocols, enabling high-fidelity execution. Reflections suggest price discovery and atomic settlement in institutional digital asset derivatives.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-framework-enabling-multi-leg-spread-strategies-for-optimized-liquidity.jpg)

A weighted scoring rubric is a decision-making system that translates strategic priorities into a quantifiable, objective vendor evaluation framework.

- 
### [How Can Weighted Scoring in an Rfp Align Vendor Selection with Core Business Objectives?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-weighted-scoring-in-an-rfp-align-vendor-selection-with-core-business-objectives/)
![An Institutional Grade RFQ Engine core for Digital Asset Derivatives. This Prime RFQ Intelligence Layer ensures High-Fidelity Execution, driving Optimal Price Discovery and Atomic Settlement for Aggregated Inquiries.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-core-high-fidelity.jpg)

Weighted scoring aligns vendor selection with business objectives by translating strategic priorities into a quantitative evaluation framework.

- 
### [What Are the Key Differences between a Cost-Weighted Rfp and a Best-Value Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-between-a-cost-weighted-rfp-and-a-best-value-rfp/)
![A sophisticated institutional digital asset derivatives platform unveils its core market microstructure. Intricate circuitry powers a central blue spherical RFQ protocol engine on a polished circular surface. This Prime RFQ enables optimal price discovery, high-fidelity execution, and multi-leg spread trading for institutional block trades, ensuring capital efficiency and systemic risk mitigation.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-unveiling-rfq-protocol-engine-market-microstructure-for-optimal-price-discovery-and-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

A cost-weighted RFP prioritizes the lowest price among compliant bids, while a best-value RFP seeks the optimal combination of cost and quality.

- 
### [What Are the Key Differences between a Price-Focused and a Value-Focused Rfp Evaluation Model?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-between-a-price-focused-and-a-value-focused-rfp-evaluation-model/)
![A futuristic circular lens or sensor, centrally focused, mounted on a robust, multi-layered metallic base. This visual metaphor represents a precise RFQ protocol interface for institutional digital asset derivatives, symbolizing the focal point of price discovery, facilitating high-fidelity execution and managing liquidity pool access for Bitcoin options.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-rfq-protocol-for-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

A price-focused RFP model selects the lowest cost, while a value-focused model optimizes for total lifecycle performance and strategic fit.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "How Should an Organization Properly Weight Cost versus Technical Merit in an Rfp?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-should-an-organization-properly-weight-cost-versus-technical-merit-in-an-rfp/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-should-an-organization-properly-weight-cost-versus-technical-merit-in-an-rfp/"
    },
    "headline": "How Should an Organization Properly Weight Cost versus Technical Merit in an Rfp? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "An RFP's cost-to-technical weighting is the quantified expression of an organization's strategic priorities and risk tolerance. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-should-an-organization-properly-weight-cost-versus-technical-merit-in-an-rfp/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-07T21:05:32+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-10-28T08:08:26+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-prime-os-execution.jpg",
        "caption": "Two distinct bars, one dark and articulated, the other light, cross on a curved teal surface. This symbolizes the complex interplay of a multi-leg spread and its underlying asset within institutional digital asset derivatives trading. It highlights a Prime RFQ facilitating high-fidelity execution via RFQ protocols, optimizing capital efficiency and mitigating counterparty risk. This setup underscores precise price discovery and strategic alpha generation within market microstructure."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Best Value",
        "Best Value Procurement",
        "Best Value Trade-Off",
        "Cost-Technical Tradeoff",
        "Lowest Price Technically Acceptable",
        "LPTA",
        "Procurement Strategy",
        "Quantitative Evaluation",
        "RFP Evaluation",
        "RFP Scoring Models",
        "Scoring Rubric",
        "Strategic Sourcing",
        "Supplier Selection",
        "Technical Evaluation",
        "Technical Merit Weighting",
        "Total Cost of Ownership"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/how-should-an-organization-properly-weight-cost-versus-technical-merit-in-an-rfp/
