# How Should an Organization Structure a CCB for a Highly Agile or Iterative Procurement Process? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-09
**Categories:** Question

---

![Sharp, intersecting metallic silver, teal, blue, and beige planes converge, illustrating complex liquidity pools and order book dynamics in institutional trading. This form embodies high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement for digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols, optimized by a Principal's operational framework](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-digital-asset-derivatives-market-microstructure-high-fidelity-execution-across-multi-leg-spread-rfq-protocol-orchestration-within-principals-operational-framework.jpg)

![Polished concentric metallic and glass components represent an advanced Prime RFQ for institutional digital asset derivatives. It visualizes high-fidelity execution, price discovery, and order book dynamics within market microstructure, enabling efficient RFQ protocols for block trades](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-prime-os-precision.jpg)

## Concept

An organization confronts a fundamental operational challenge when navigating a highly agile or [iterative procurement](https://prime.greeks.live/area/iterative-procurement/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) process ▴ maintaining governance without impeding velocity. The traditional [Change Control Board](https://prime.greeks.live/area/change-control-board/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (CCB), a mechanism born from predictive, waterfall-style project management, often materializes as a bureaucratic bottleneck in environments that prize speed and adaptability. Its rigid, formal review cycles are systemically misaligned with the fluid nature of iterative development, where requirements evolve and priorities can shift with each sprint. The core issue resides in a structural mismatch.

A legacy CCB is designed as a tollgate, a centralized point of authority that scrutinizes change against a static baseline. In agile procurement, the baseline itself is dynamic; the goal is not to prevent deviation but to intelligently manage a continuous flow of adjustments to maximize value delivery.

Structuring a CCB for this context requires a complete reframing of its purpose. It must be reconceptualized from a gatekeeper into a dynamic control system ▴ an integrated component of the procurement value stream. Its function shifts from top-down enforcement to enabling informed, decentralized decision-making.

This modern CCB acts as a facilitator and a risk management function, ensuring that as changes are proposed and implemented, they are evaluated for their strategic alignment, resource impact, and technical feasibility without introducing unnecessary delay. It provides the essential guardrails that allow agile teams to move quickly and safely.

> The objective is to design a governance framework that is as iterative as the procurement process it oversees.

This evolved structure embeds governance directly into the workflow. Instead of a separate, external review body that convenes periodically, the [agile CCB](https://prime.greeks.live/area/agile-ccb/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) becomes a lightweight, continuous process. It leverages cross-functional expertise from business, technology, and procurement, not as a formal committee, but as a network of designated authorities who can be rapidly consulted. The emphasis moves from comprehensive, upfront documentation to just-in-time analysis, focusing on the marginal impact of a proposed change.

By defining clear thresholds for what constitutes a significant change requiring broader review, the system empowers teams to handle minor adjustments autonomously, escalating only those with substantial implications for budget, timeline, or strategic objectives. This creates a tiered, responsive governance model that aligns with the principles of agile development.

![Polished, curved surfaces in teal, black, and beige delineate the intricate market microstructure of institutional digital asset derivatives. These distinct layers symbolize segregated liquidity pools, facilitating optimal RFQ protocol execution and high-fidelity execution, minimizing slippage for large block trades and enhancing capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-rfq-protocol-execution-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-flow.jpg)

![A metallic blade signifies high-fidelity execution and smart order routing, piercing a complex Prime RFQ orb. Within, market microstructure, algorithmic trading, and liquidity pools are visualized](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-prime-os-execution-precision.jpg)

## Strategy

![A sleek, multi-component device with a dark blue base and beige bands culminates in a sophisticated top mechanism. This precision instrument symbolizes a Crypto Derivatives OS facilitating RFQ protocol for block trade execution, ensuring high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement for institutional-grade digital asset derivatives across diverse liquidity pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/advanced-mechanism-for-principal-trading-firm-rfq-protocols-and-high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

## The Federated Governance Model

A primary strategic decision in designing a CCB for an agile environment is the shift from a centralized to a [federated governance](https://prime.greeks.live/area/federated-governance/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) model. A traditional, monolithic CCB creates a single point of failure and a predictable bottleneck. The federated approach, in contrast, distributes decision-making authority, creating a more resilient and responsive system.

This model establishes a small, central governing body ▴ the Core CCB ▴ responsible for setting the overarching [change management](https://prime.greeks.live/area/change-management/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) policy, defining risk thresholds, and adjudicating major strategic changes that have enterprise-level impact. Concurrently, it empowers individual project or product teams with their own lightweight, localized change authorities.

These local boards, often comprising the [product owner](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-role-of-a-product-owner-change-when-dealing-with-fixed-nfrs-from-an-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), a technical lead, and a procurement representative, are authorized to approve changes that fall within pre-defined boundaries. This structure dramatically accelerates the decision-making process for the majority of changes, which are typically minor adjustments or refinements. The Core CCB only intervenes when a [change request](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-change-in-risk-capacity-differ-from-a-change-in-risk-tolerance-during-due-diligence/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) exceeds a certain cost threshold, impacts multiple systems, or alters a fundamental strategic objective of the procurement. This tiered system ensures that the level of oversight is proportional to the magnitude of the change, a core tenet of lean governance.

![A sleek, dark metallic surface features a cylindrical module with a luminous blue top, embodying a Prime RFQ control for RFQ protocol initiation. This institutional-grade interface enables high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives block trades, ensuring private quotation and atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-module-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## Risk-Based Triage and Decision Frameworks

An effective agile CCB operates on a principle of [risk-based triage](https://prime.greeks.live/area/risk-based-triage/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). Every proposed change is not treated equally; instead, it is rapidly assessed and categorized based on its potential impact. This requires a clear, pre-defined framework for risk assessment.

A common approach is to use a simple matrix that evaluates changes along two axes ▴ technical complexity and business impact. This allows the team to quickly classify changes into distinct tiers.

- 
**Tier 1 Low Risk** ▴ These are minor adjustments with minimal impact, such as user interface tweaks or minor bug fixes. These changes are often pre-approved or can be signed off by the product owner directly, requiring no formal CCB review.

- 
**Tier 2 Medium Risk** ▴ These changes might involve moderate technical effort or have a noticeable impact on a specific user group. They typically require a review by the local, team-level change authority. The focus of this review is to ensure the change aligns with the current sprint goals and does not introduce unforeseen dependencies.

- 
**Tier 3 High Risk** ▴ These are significant changes that affect the core architecture, have major budgetary implications, or alter the strategic direction of the procurement. These requests are automatically escalated to the Core CCB for a more thorough review.

This triage system is complemented by standardized decision-making frameworks like DACI (Driver, Approver, Contributor, Informed) to clarify roles and responsibilities for each change request. By defining who approves a change versus who merely needs to be consulted or informed, the process eliminates ambiguity and reduces delays caused by confusion over authority.

> By integrating governance into the delivery pipeline, the agile CCB transforms from a checkpoint into a continuous feedback loop.

![A sleek, precision-engineered device with a split-screen interface displaying implied volatility and price discovery data for digital asset derivatives. This institutional grade module optimizes RFQ protocols, ensuring high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency within market microstructure for multi-leg spreads](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-module.jpg)

## Integrating the CCB with the Technology Stack

The strategy for an agile CCB is critically dependent on its seamless integration with the organization’s [project management](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-integration-of-risk-management-into-the-rfp-process-affect-long-term-project-success/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) and communication tools. The [change control](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-role-based-access-control-differ-from-attribute-based-access-control-for-financial-systems/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) process should not exist in a separate silo of spreadsheets and email chains. Instead, it must be embedded directly into the platforms where work is already happening, such as Jira, Azure DevOps, or similar agile planning tools. This integration serves several strategic purposes.

First, it ensures that all [change requests](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-change-in-risk-capacity-differ-from-a-change-in-risk-tolerance-during-due-diligence/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) are captured, tracked, and documented automatically. A change request can be initiated as a specific issue type within Jira, with a dedicated workflow that reflects the risk-based triage process. This creates a single source of truth and a complete audit trail for every change. Second, automation can be used to enforce the governance process.

For example, a Jira workflow can be configured to automatically route high-risk changes to the Core CCB for approval, preventing them from being moved into a development sprint prematurely. Third, integration enables real-time visibility. Dashboards can be created to monitor key metrics such as the volume of change requests, approval cycle times, and the distribution of changes by risk tier. This data provides the Core CCB with the insights needed to continuously refine and improve the governance process itself.

The table below compares the traditional and agile CCB models across key strategic dimensions.

| Dimension | Traditional CCB Model | Agile CCB Model |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Structure | Centralized, monolithic committee. | Federated model with a Core CCB and empowered local authorities. |
| Decision-Making | Formal, periodic meetings with a focus on comprehensive review. | Continuous, just-in-time decisions based on risk triage. |
| Focus | Scope protection and adherence to a static baseline. | Value delivery and management of an evolving baseline. |
| Process | Bureaucratic, with heavy upfront documentation requirements. | Lightweight, with documentation generated as part of the workflow. |
| Technology | Often managed through disconnected documents and manual tracking. | Deeply integrated with agile project management and CI/CD tools. |

![A polished, dark teal institutional-grade mechanism reveals an internal beige interface, precisely deploying a metallic, arrow-etched component. This signifies high-fidelity execution within an RFQ protocol, enabling atomic settlement and optimized price discovery for institutional digital asset derivatives and multi-leg spreads, ensuring minimal slippage and robust capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/quantitative-finance-driven-rfq-workflow-for-best-execution-in-digital-assets.jpg)

![Precision-engineered metallic tracks house a textured block with a central threaded aperture. This visualizes a core RFQ execution component within an institutional market microstructure, enabling private quotation for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-framework-precision-microstructure-component.jpg)

## Execution

![A modular, institutional-grade device with a central data aggregation interface and metallic spigot. This Prime RFQ represents a robust RFQ protocol engine, enabling high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives, optimizing capital efficiency and best execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/principals-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-for-optimized-rfq-protocol-best-execution-system.jpg)

## The Operational Playbook

Implementing an agile Change Control Board requires a detailed operational playbook that defines the structure, processes, and roles. This playbook serves as the practical guide for the entire organization, ensuring consistency and clarity in how changes are managed within an iterative procurement framework. The execution begins with the formal establishment of the CCB’s charter.

![A central RFQ engine flanked by distinct liquidity pools represents a Principal's operational framework. This abstract system enables high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives, optimizing capital efficiency and price discovery within market microstructure for institutional trading](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-engine-optimal-execution-for-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

## Phase 1 ▴ Charter and Composition

- 
**Develop the CCB Charter** ▴ This document is the constitution of the agile CCB. It must explicitly define the board’s mission, scope, and authority. The mission should be framed around enabling rapid, value-driven change while managing risk. The scope must clearly delineate what types of changes fall under CCB governance (e.g. changes to baseline requirements, architecture, budget, or schedule) and what is excluded (e.g. routine bug fixes within a sprint).

- 
**Define the Federated Structure** ▴ The charter must outline the two-tiered structure, specifying the composition and responsibilities of both the Core CCB and the local, team-level change authorities.

<li>**Core CCB Composition** ▴ This group should be small and strategic, typically including a senior procurement leader, the head of engineering or architecture, a lead product manager, and a representative from finance. Their focus is on enterprise-level impact.

- **Local Authority Composition** ▴ This group is embedded within the project team and usually consists of the Product Owner, the Scrum Master or technical lead, and the primary business stakeholder for that team. Their focus is on sprint-level and product-level impact.

</li>
- 
**Establish Risk and Materiality Thresholds** ▴ The charter must quantify the thresholds that trigger escalation from a local authority to the Core CCB. These should be concrete and unambiguous. For example, any change that increases the total project cost by more than 5%, pushes the final delivery date by more than two weeks, or requires integration with a new enterprise system must be escalated.

![Precision mechanics illustrating institutional RFQ protocol dynamics. Metallic and blue blades symbolize principal's bids and counterparty responses, pivoting on a central matching engine](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-engine-microstructure.jpg)

## Phase 2 ▴ Process and Workflow Implementation

With the structure defined, the next step is to operationalize the change management process within the organization’s technology stack, most commonly an [agile project management](https://prime.greeks.live/area/agile-project-management/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) tool like Jira.

- 
**Configure the Change Request Workflow** ▴ Create a specific issue type in Jira for “Change Requests.” This issue type should have its own custom workflow that mirrors the agile CCB process. The workflow stages should include:

<li>**Draft** ▴ The initial creation of the change request.

- **Triage Review** ▴ An automated or manual step where the request is assessed against the risk matrix.

- **Local Review (for Tier 1/2)** ▴ The request is assigned to the local change authority for approval.

- **Core CCB Review (for Tier 3)** ▴ The request is escalated to the Core CCB’s dedicated review board.

- **Approved / Rejected** ▴ The final decision is recorded.

- **Backlog** ▴ If approved, the request is moved to the appropriate product backlog for prioritization.

</li>
- 
**Standardize the Change Request Form** ▴ The Jira issue template for a Change Request must be standardized to ensure that all necessary information is captured concisely. Required fields should include a clear problem statement, the proposed solution, the expected business value, an initial estimate of effort, and an impact analysis covering technical, financial, and operational aspects.

- 
**Automate Notifications and Escalations** ▴ Use the automation features within the project management tool to streamline the process. Configure rules that automatically assign change requests to the correct review group based on the triage assessment. Set up automated notifications to keep all stakeholders informed of status changes.

![A fractured, polished disc with a central, sharp conical element symbolizes fragmented digital asset liquidity. This Principal RFQ engine ensures high-fidelity execution, precise price discovery, and atomic settlement within complex market microstructure, optimizing capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-rfq-engine-unifying-fragmented-digital-asset-derivatives-liquidity-for-best-execution.jpg)

## Quantitative Modeling and Data Analysis

An agile CCB thrives on data. Its decisions are not based on opinion but on a quantitative understanding of impact and value. The execution of the CCB must therefore include the development and maintenance of a data analysis framework to support its decision-making. This involves tracking key performance indicators (KPIs) and using simple models to evaluate change requests.

![A precisely engineered system features layered grey and beige plates, representing distinct liquidity pools or market segments, connected by a central dark blue RFQ protocol hub. Transparent teal bars, symbolizing multi-leg options spreads or algorithmic trading pathways, intersect through this core, facilitating price discovery and high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives via an institutional-grade Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-facilitating-high-fidelity-multi-leg-options-spread-execution-best-price-discovery-and-latent-liquidity-access-for-prime-brokerage.jpg)

## Key Performance Indicators for the Agile CCB

A dedicated dashboard should be created to monitor the health and efficiency of the change control process. This dashboard provides the Core CCB with the data needed to identify bottlenecks and continuously improve the system.

| KPI | Description | Target | Data Source |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Change Cycle Time | The average time from the submission of a change request to its final approval or rejection. | < 48 hours for local review; < 5 business days for Core CCB review. | Jira workflow transition dates. |
| Approval Rate | The percentage of submitted change requests that are approved. This can be segmented by risk tier. | N/A (This is a monitoring metric; a very high or low rate may indicate issues). | Jira issue status data. |
| Change Request Volume | The number of new change requests submitted per week or per sprint. | Monitor for trends that may indicate scope instability. | Jira issue creation data. |
| Escalation Rate | The percentage of change requests that are escalated to the Core CCB. | Should align with the expected distribution of high-risk changes (e.g. 5-10%). | Jira workflow data. |
| Post-Implementation Issue Rate | The percentage of changes that result in critical bugs or operational issues after deployment. | < 2% | Jira data linking change requests to subsequent bug reports. |

![A precision optical component stands on a dark, reflective surface, symbolizing a Price Discovery engine for Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives. This Crypto Derivatives OS element enables High-Fidelity Execution through advanced Algorithmic Trading and Multi-Leg Spread capabilities, optimizing Market Microstructure for RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-optimal-execution-system-microstructure.jpg)

## Cost of Delay Modeling

For high-risk changes, a more sophisticated analysis is often required. One of the most powerful tools for this is a simplified [Cost of Delay](https://prime.greeks.live/area/cost-of-delay/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (CoD) model. The CoD framework helps the CCB prioritize changes by quantifying the financial impact of not implementing them. The model requires the team to estimate two key variables:

- **Value per Week** ▴ The anticipated weekly revenue increase or cost savings that the change will generate once implemented.

- **Urgency** ▴ How quickly the value decays if the change is delayed.

The CoD is calculated by combining these factors. For example, a change that is expected to generate $10,000 per week in new revenue and has a high urgency (e.g. tied to a specific market opportunity) will have a very high CoD. The CCB can use this quantitative measure to make objective trade-off decisions between competing high-risk change requests, ensuring that the organization’s resources are always focused on the initiatives with the highest economic impact.

![Two abstract, polished components, diagonally split, reveal internal translucent blue-green fluid structures. This visually represents the Principal's Operational Framework for Institutional Grade Digital Asset Derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-prime-os-liquidity-framework.jpg)

## Predictive Scenario Analysis

To illustrate the agile CCB in practice, consider a realistic scenario. A financial services company is in the middle of a large-scale procurement and implementation of a new cloud-based portfolio management system. The project is being run using an iterative, agile methodology, with new features being delivered in two-week sprints. The organization has implemented a federated agile CCB structure as described in the playbook.

Mid-way through the project, a new regulatory requirement is announced by a financial authority. The new rule mandates that all client communications must be archived for a period of ten years, a significant increase from the current seven-year requirement. This change has a direct impact on the data storage and archiving module of the new portfolio management system, which is scheduled for development in three months. The product owner for the data services team immediately creates a Tier 3 Change Request in Jira.

> The agile CCB transforms risk assessment from a subjective debate into a data-driven evaluation.

The change request form is automatically populated with the required fields. The product owner details the new regulatory mandate, links to the official publication, and outlines the proposed solution ▴ leveraging a more expensive, long-term archival storage tier from their cloud provider. The initial impact analysis notes that this will increase the projected annual data storage costs by an estimated 15% and will require a re-architecture of the data lifecycle management policies within the system. Because the cost increase exceeds the 5% materiality threshold, the Jira workflow automatically escalates the change request to the Core CCB and schedules it for review at their next weekly meeting.

Before the meeting, the Core CCB members review the request in Jira. The representative from the architecture team adds a comment noting that while the proposed solution is feasible, it will require an additional two sprints of development effort to implement and test the new archiving policies. The finance representative runs a quick model and confirms the 15% cost increase, translating it to an additional $75,000 in operational expenditure per year. During the Core CCB meeting, the discussion is highly focused.

The members do not debate the need for the change; the regulatory driver makes it non-negotiable. The conversation centers on the optimal implementation strategy. They use the data provided to weigh two options ▴ Option A is to absorb the change into the existing project timeline, which would delay the launch of other planned features. Option B is to approve an increase in the project budget to bring in a specialized cloud engineering contractor to accelerate the development of the new archiving module.

Using a Cost of Delay analysis, they determine that delaying the other features, which are tied to a new product launch, would have a CoD of approximately $50,000 per week. The cost of the contractor for the required two months is calculated to be $40,000. The decision becomes clear. The Core CCB formally approves the change request and the associated budget increase for the contractor.

The decision, along with the supporting rationale and data, is recorded in the Jira ticket. The entire process, from the identification of the new requirement to the final, data-backed decision, takes less than four business days. This allows the project team to adapt to a significant external event with minimal disruption and maximum velocity.

![A central processing core with intersecting, transparent structures revealing intricate internal components and blue data flows. This symbolizes an institutional digital asset derivatives platform's Prime RFQ, orchestrating high-fidelity execution, managing aggregated RFQ inquiries, and ensuring atomic settlement within dynamic market microstructure, optimizing capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-system-facilitating-high-fidelity-rfq-protocol-optimization-for-best-execution-and-atomic-settlement.jpg)

## System Integration and Technological Architecture

The effectiveness of an agile CCB is underpinned by its technological architecture. The goal is to create a seamless, automated governance ecosystem that provides real-time data and minimizes manual effort. This architecture is typically built around a core set of integrated tools.

The central hub of the system is the [agile project](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-should-rfp-weighting-strategies-evolve-for-agile-versus-waterfall-project-methodologies/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) management platform, such as Jira or Azure DevOps. This platform is configured with the custom workflows, fields, and permissions that define the CCB process. It serves as the system of record for all change requests.

This central hub is then integrated with other key systems via APIs:

- 
**Collaboration and Documentation Platforms (e.g. Confluence, SharePoint)** ▴ When a change request is approved in Jira, an API call can automatically create a corresponding page in Confluence. This page can be pre-populated with the details from the change request and serve as the living documentation for the change, capturing architectural diagrams, test plans, and implementation notes.

- 
**CI/CD Pipeline (e.g. Jenkins, GitLab CI)** ▴ The approval of a change request in Jira can trigger actions in the CI/CD pipeline. For example, it could automatically create a new feature branch in the source code repository, ensuring that development work on the change is properly tracked and isolated.

- 
**Financial and Procurement Systems (e.g. SAP, Oracle)** ▴ For changes with a financial impact, an integration can be built to push approved budget adjustments from Jira directly into the organization’s financial system. This eliminates the need for manual data entry and ensures that the project’s financial records are always up-to-date.

- 
**Business Intelligence and Visualization Tools (e.g. Tableau, Power BI)** ▴ The data from Jira is continuously fed into a BI tool to populate the CCB’s KPI dashboard. This provides the leadership with a real-time, graphical view of the change management process, allowing them to spot trends and make informed decisions about process improvements.

This integrated architecture transforms the CCB from a series of meetings and documents into a living, automated system. It ensures that governance is not an afterthought but an intrinsic part of the procurement and development lifecycle, providing the control needed to manage risk while enabling the speed and flexibility required by an agile enterprise.

![A segmented teal and blue institutional digital asset derivatives platform reveals its core market microstructure. Internal layers expose sophisticated algorithmic execution engines, high-fidelity liquidity aggregation, and real-time risk management protocols, integral to a Prime RFQ supporting Bitcoin options and Ethereum futures trading](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-core-microstructure.jpg)

## References

- Fernandez, D. J. & Fernandez, J. D. (2008). Agile project management-agilism versus traditional approaches. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 49(2), 10-17.

- White, D. & Fortune, J. (2012). Current practice in project management ▴ An empirical study. International Journal of Project Management, 20(1), 1-11.

- Atlassian. (n.d.). Master Agile Project Management with Jira. Atlassian. Retrieved from official Atlassian documentation.

- Project Management Institute. (2017). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) (6th ed.). Project Management Institute.

- Aiello, R. T. & Sachs, L. S. (2016). Configuration Management Best Practices ▴ Practical Methods that Work in the Real World. Addison-Wesley Professional.

- Humble, J. & Farley, D. (2010). Continuous Delivery ▴ Reliable Software Releases through Build, Test, and Deployment Automation. Addison-Wesley Professional.

- Leffingwell, D. (2007). Scaling Software Agility ▴ Best Practices for Large Enterprises. Addison-Wesley Professional.

- Larman, C. (2004). Agile and Iterative Development ▴ A Manager’s Guide. Addison-Wesley Professional.

![A luminous digital asset core, symbolizing price discovery, rests on a dark liquidity pool. Surrounding metallic infrastructure signifies Prime RFQ and high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-core-high-fidelity-execution-engine-for-principal-trading.jpg)

## Reflection

![A cutaway view reveals an advanced RFQ protocol engine for institutional digital asset derivatives. Intricate coiled components represent algorithmic liquidity provision and portfolio margin calculations](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocol-engine-digital-asset-derivatives-core-internal-mechanism-visualized.jpg)

## Governance as a Dynamic System

The transition to an agile Change Control Board is more than a procedural adjustment; it represents a philosophical shift in an organization’s approach to governance. It moves away from a static, command-and-control mindset toward the concept of governance as a dynamic, adaptive system. This system is not designed to prevent change, but to channel it productively. It acknowledges that in any complex procurement process, change is not a risk to be eliminated, but a source of value to be harnessed.

Viewing the CCB through this lens encourages a continuous process of refinement and optimization. The data gathered from the CCB’s operations ▴ the cycle times, the approval rates, the post-implementation issue metrics ▴ becomes the feedback loop that drives the evolution of the governance framework itself. The objective is to create a system that learns, adapting its rules and thresholds in response to the changing needs of the organization and the specific challenges of its projects. This approach fosters a culture of empowered, data-informed decision-making, where governance is seen not as a bureaucratic burden, but as a strategic enabler of agility and a critical component of a resilient operational framework.

![A dark, reflective surface features a segmented circular mechanism, reminiscent of an RFQ aggregation engine or liquidity pool. Specks suggest market microstructure dynamics or data latency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-options-rfq-execution-microstructure-prime-os.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/iterative-procurement/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, metallic module with a dark, reflective sphere sits atop a cylindrical base, symbolizing an institutional-grade Crypto Derivatives OS. This system processes aggregated inquiries for RFQ protocols, enabling high-fidelity execution of multi-leg spreads while managing gamma exposure and slippage within dark pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-trading-crypto-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-system.jpg)

## Iterative Procurement

Meaning ▴ Iterative procurement is a strategic acquisition approach characterized by cyclical phases of requirement refinement, solution development, and vendor engagement. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/change-control-board/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A layered, cream and dark blue structure with a transparent angular screen. This abstract visual embodies an institutional-grade Prime RFQ for high-fidelity RFQ execution, enabling deep liquidity aggregation and real-time risk management for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-layered-structure-for-institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution.jpg)

## Change Control Board

Meaning ▴ A Change Control Board (CCB) is a formal group of stakeholders responsible for reviewing, approving, or rejecting proposed modifications to a project's baselines, product configurations, or operational systems. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/agile-ccb/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Sleek metallic system component with intersecting translucent fins, symbolizing multi-leg spread execution for institutional grade digital asset derivatives. It enables high-fidelity execution and price discovery via RFQ protocols, optimizing market microstructure and gamma exposure for capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-system-rfq-protocols.jpg)

## Agile Ccb

Meaning ▴ An Agile Change Control Board (CCB) in the context of crypto systems architecture denotes a responsive, iterative governance structure responsible for evaluating and authorizing modifications to digital asset platforms, protocols, or trading algorithms. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/federated-governance/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Sleek, metallic components with reflective blue surfaces depict an advanced institutional RFQ protocol. Its central pivot and radiating arms symbolize aggregated inquiry for multi-leg spread execution, optimizing order book dynamics](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-microstructure-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

## Federated Governance

Meaning ▴ Federated Governance, in the context of crypto and decentralized systems architecture, describes a distributed governance model where decision-making authority is shared among multiple independent or semi-independent entities. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/change-management/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A dark, precision-engineered core system, with metallic rings and an active segment, represents a Prime RFQ for institutional digital asset derivatives. Its transparent, faceted shaft symbolizes high-fidelity RFQ protocol execution, real-time price discovery, and atomic settlement, ensuring capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-core-for-high-fidelity-rfq-protocol-execution-and-atomic-settlement.jpg)

## Change Management

Meaning ▴ Within the inherently dynamic and rapidly evolving crypto ecosystem, Change Management refers to the structured and systematic approach employed by institutions to guide and facilitate the orderly transition of organizational processes, technological infrastructure, and human capital in response to significant shifts. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-change-in-risk-capacity-differ-from-a-change-in-risk-tolerance-during-due-diligence/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A polished, abstract geometric form represents a dynamic RFQ Protocol for institutional-grade digital asset derivatives. A central liquidity pool is surrounded by opening market segments, revealing an emerging arm displaying high-fidelity execution data](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-system.jpg)

## Change Request

A change in risk capacity alters an institution's financial ability to bear loss; a change in risk tolerance shifts its psychological will. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-role-of-a-product-owner-change-when-dealing-with-fixed-nfrs-from-an-rfp/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A central, precision-engineered component with teal accents rises from a reflective surface. This embodies a high-fidelity RFQ engine, driving optimal price discovery for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-engine-for-price-discovery.jpg)

## Product Owner

The Product Owner's role shifts from value discovery to risk mitigation, architecting a compliant system within fixed quality boundaries. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/risk-based-triage/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A central, multi-layered cylindrical component rests on a highly reflective surface. This core quantitative analytics engine facilitates high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-core-optimization.jpg)

## Risk-Based Triage

Meaning ▴ Risk-Based Triage, in the context of crypto systems architecture, is a methodology for prioritizing and addressing operational incidents, security vulnerabilities, or system anomalies based on their potential impact to the platform, its users, or the digital assets under management. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-the-integration-of-risk-management-into-the-rfp-process-affect-long-term-project-success/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Intersecting abstract planes, some smooth, some mottled, symbolize the intricate market microstructure of institutional digital asset derivatives. These layers represent RFQ protocols, aggregated liquidity pools, and a Prime RFQ intelligence layer, ensuring high-fidelity execution and optimal price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-market-microstructure.jpg)

## Project Management

Integrating risk management into the RFP process codifies project resilience and transforms vendor selection into a predictive science. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-role-based-access-control-differ-from-attribute-based-access-control-for-financial-systems/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Two sleek, polished, curved surfaces, one dark teal, one vibrant teal, converge on a beige element, symbolizing a precise interface for high-fidelity execution. This visual metaphor represents seamless RFQ protocol integration within a Principal's operational framework, optimizing liquidity aggregation and price discovery for institutional digital asset derivatives via algorithmic trading](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocol-interface-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

## Change Control

RBAC assigns permissions by static role, while ABAC provides dynamic, granular control using multi-faceted attributes. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-change-in-risk-capacity-differ-from-a-change-in-risk-tolerance-during-due-diligence/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A modular system with beige and mint green components connected by a central blue cross-shaped element, illustrating an institutional-grade RFQ execution engine. This sophisticated architecture facilitates high-fidelity execution, enabling efficient price discovery for multi-leg spreads and optimizing capital efficiency within a Prime RFQ framework for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-prime-os-rfq-engine-for-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

## Change Requests

A change in risk capacity alters an institution's financial ability to bear loss; a change in risk tolerance shifts its psychological will. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/agile-project-management/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A central teal column embodies Prime RFQ infrastructure for institutional digital asset derivatives. Angled, concentric discs symbolize dynamic market microstructure and volatility surface data, facilitating RFQ protocols and price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-alpha-generation-execution.jpg)

## Agile Project Management

Meaning ▴ Agile Project Management constitutes an iterative, adaptive approach to managing complex projects, particularly within software development and systems deployment. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/cost-of-delay/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![An abstract, precision-engineered mechanism showcases polished chrome components connecting a blue base, cream panel, and a teal display with numerical data. This symbolizes an institutional-grade RFQ protocol for digital asset derivatives, ensuring high-fidelity execution, price discovery, multi-leg spread processing, and atomic settlement within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-precision-execution-1.jpg)

## Cost of Delay

Meaning ▴ Cost of Delay refers to the economic impact incurred by postponing a decision, action, or project implementation. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-should-rfp-weighting-strategies-evolve-for-agile-versus-waterfall-project-methodologies/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A multifaceted, luminous abstract structure against a dark void, symbolizing institutional digital asset derivatives market microstructure. Its sharp, reflective surfaces embody high-fidelity execution, RFQ protocol efficiency, and precise price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-protocol-architecture-optimizing-high-fidelity-rfq-execution-and-latent-liquidity-discovery.jpg)

## Agile Project

RFP weighting must evolve from a static compliance checklist for Waterfall to a dynamic capability assessment for Agile partnerships. </a>

**Tags:** [Cost of Delay](https://options.greeks.live/area/cost-of-delay/), [Iterative Procurement](https://options.greeks.live/area/iterative-procurement/), [Change Management](https://options.greeks.live/area/change-management/), [Jira Integration](https://options.greeks.live/area/jira-integration/), [Procurement Governance](https://options.greeks.live/area/procurement-governance/), [Change Control Board](https://options.greeks.live/area/change-control-board/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [In Which Scenarios outside of Construction Would a Two-Stage Rfp Provide the Most Significant Strategic Advantage?](https://options.greeks.live/question/in-which-scenarios-outside-of-construction-would-a-two-stage-rfp-provide-the-most-significant-strategic-advantage/)
![A sleek spherical device with a central teal-glowing display, embodying an Institutional Digital Asset RFQ intelligence layer. Its robust design signifies a Prime RFQ for high-fidelity execution, enabling precise price discovery and optimal liquidity aggregation across complex market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-microstructure-price-discovery-prime-os.jpg)

A two-stage RFP is a system for acquiring complex solutions by prioritizing collaborative technical design before financial negotiation.

- 
### [How Can an Organization Differentiate between a Necessary Rfp Cancellation and One Caused by Internal Dysfunction?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-differentiate-between-a-necessary-rfp-cancellation-and-one-caused-by-internal-dysfunction/)
![A central toroidal structure and intricate core are bisected by two blades: one algorithmic with circuits, the other solid. This symbolizes an institutional digital asset derivatives platform, leveraging RFQ protocols for high-fidelity execution and price discovery. It optimizes market microstructure for capital efficiency, managing multi-leg spreads and latent liquidity within a Principal's operational framework.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-hub-integrating-algorithmic-intelligence-for-high-fidelity-price-discovery-and-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

Differentiating between necessary and dysfunctional RFP cancellations hinges on a rigorous, data-driven analysis of root causes.

- 
### [What Are the Best Practices for Conducting a Fair and Unbiased RFP Consensus Scoring Meeting?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-best-practices-for-conducting-a-fair-and-unbiased-rfp-consensus-scoring-meeting/)
![A precision-engineered teal metallic mechanism, featuring springs and rods, connects to a light U-shaped interface. This represents a core RFQ protocol component enabling automated price discovery and high-fidelity execution. It signifies a Principal's operational framework for institutional block trades, multi-leg spreads, and optimizing latency within a Crypto Derivatives OS.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/rfq-execution-engine-component-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

A fair RFP consensus meeting is a systemically designed protocol that neutralizes bias through structured deliberation and data-driven analysis.

- 
### [How Do You Create an Objective Vendor Scoring System for an Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-create-an-objective-vendor-scoring-system-for-an-rfp/)
![Intersecting metallic structures symbolize RFQ protocol pathways for institutional digital asset derivatives. They represent high-fidelity execution of multi-leg spreads across diverse liquidity pools. Spheres denote aggregated inquiry and price discovery within a robust Prime RFQ, optimizing capital efficiency and mitigating systemic risk.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-framework-optimizing-multi-leg-spreads-and-liquidity-aggregation-for-best-execution.jpg)

An objective vendor scoring system translates strategic priorities into a quantitative, defensible decision-making framework.

- 
### [How Can an Organization Ensure the Objectivity of Its Rfp Evaluation Team?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-ensure-the-objectivity-of-its-rfp-evaluation-team/)
![Abstract architectural representation of a Prime RFQ for institutional digital asset derivatives, illustrating RFQ aggregation and high-fidelity execution. Intersecting beams signify multi-leg spread pathways and liquidity pools, while spheres represent atomic settlement points and implied volatility. A central intelligence layer monitors market microstructure for best execution.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/architecting-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-systems-for-optimized-rfq-execution-and-advanced-price-discovery.jpg)

An organization ensures RFP evaluation objectivity by architecting a resilient system of governance, weighted scoring, and procedural firewalls.

- 
### [What Is the Typical Implementation Time for an AI-Powered RFP Platform?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-typical-implementation-time-for-an-ai-powered-rfp-platform/)
![Abstract system interface on a global data sphere, illustrating a sophisticated RFQ protocol for institutional digital asset derivatives. The glowing circuits represent market microstructure and high-fidelity execution within a Prime RFQ intelligence layer, facilitating price discovery and capital efficiency across liquidity pools.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-prime-os.jpg)

An AI-powered RFP platform's implementation time is a variable outcome of strategic clarity, data readiness, and integration depth.

- 
### [What Are the Primary Drivers of High Roi Figures in Successful Regtech Implementations?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-drivers-of-high-roi-figures-in-successful-regtech-implementations/)
![A sleek green probe, symbolizing a precise RFQ protocol, engages a dark, textured execution venue, representing a digital asset derivatives liquidity pool. This signifies institutional-grade price discovery and high-fidelity execution through an advanced Prime RFQ, minimizing slippage and optimizing capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-integration-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-institutional-liquidity-aggregation-on-prime-os.jpg)

High ROI in Regtech is driven by its deep integration into a firm's data architecture, transforming compliance into a source of operational intelligence.

- 
### [How Do You Weight Evaluation Criteria for an Agile Software Development RFP?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-weight-evaluation-criteria-for-an-agile-software-development-rfp/)
![A transparent, multi-faceted component, indicative of an RFQ engine's intricate market microstructure logic, emerges from complex FIX Protocol connectivity. Its sharp edges signify high-fidelity execution and price discovery precision for institutional digital asset derivatives. This Prime RFQ module optimizes algorithmic trading and capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-optimized-for-best-execution.jpg)

Weighting RFP criteria for agile development is the system for translating project priorities into a quantitative vendor selection model.

- 
### [How Can a Centralized E-Procurement Platform Improve the Auditability of the Entire Rfp Lifecycle?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-a-centralized-e-procurement-platform-improve-the-auditability-of-the-entire-rfp-lifecycle/)
![A robust, multi-layered institutional Prime RFQ, depicted by the sphere, extends a precise platform for private quotation of digital asset derivatives. A reflective sphere symbolizes high-fidelity execution of a block trade, driven by algorithmic trading for optimal liquidity aggregation within market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/robust-institutional-platform-for-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-and-optimized-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

A centralized e-procurement platform improves RFP auditability by creating a single, immutable system of record for the entire lifecycle.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "How Should an Organization Structure a CCB for a Highly Agile or Iterative Procurement Process?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-should-an-organization-structure-a-ccb-for-a-highly-agile-or-iterative-procurement-process/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-should-an-organization-structure-a-ccb-for-a-highly-agile-or-iterative-procurement-process/"
    },
    "headline": "How Should an Organization Structure a CCB for a Highly Agile or Iterative Procurement Process? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "An agile CCB is a federated, data-driven governance system designed to enable rapid, risk-informed change. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-should-an-organization-structure-a-ccb-for-a-highly-agile-or-iterative-procurement-process/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-09T05:47:34+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-10-30T05:39:27+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-module-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-liquidity-aggregation.jpg",
        "caption": "A highly refined, dark metallic system component features a prominent blue-topped cylindrical module. This element symbolizes the precise control point within an institutional-grade Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives. It represents the critical interface for RFQ protocol initiation, facilitating high-fidelity execution of block trades and multi-leg spreads. The system ensures private quotation aggregation, mitigates counterparty risk, and optimizes market microstructure for best execution and alpha generation through its intelligence layer."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Agile CCB",
        "Agile Project Management",
        "Change Control Board",
        "Change Management",
        "Continuous Delivery",
        "Cost of Delay",
        "Federated Governance",
        "Iterative Procurement",
        "Jira Integration",
        "Procurement Governance",
        "Risk-Based Triage",
        "Value Stream Management"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/how-should-an-organization-structure-a-ccb-for-a-highly-agile-or-iterative-procurement-process/
