# How Should the Weighting of Evaluation Criteria Differ between Technical and Commercial Aspects of an Rfp? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-07
**Categories:** Question

---

![Two distinct components, beige and green, are securely joined by a polished blue metallic element. This embodies a high-fidelity RFQ protocol for institutional digital asset derivatives, ensuring atomic settlement and optimal liquidity](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-rfq-protocol-for-digital-asset-derivatives-high-fidelity-link.jpg)

![A symmetrical, angular mechanism with illuminated internal components against a dark background, abstractly representing a high-fidelity execution engine for institutional digital asset derivatives. This visualizes the market microstructure and algorithmic trading precision essential for RFQ protocols, multi-leg spread strategies, and atomic settlement within a Principal OS framework, ensuring capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-execution-engine-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq.jpg)

## Concept

Determining the allocation between technical and [commercial evaluation](https://prime.greeks.live/area/commercial-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) criteria within a Request for Proposal (RFP) represents a foundational act of system design. It is the process of defining the core logic of a value-assessment engine. The weighting itself functions as the primary control mechanism, calibrating the entire evaluation system to prioritize specific performance characteristics and risk tolerances.

A precise balance is essential because the [technical criteria](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-have-regulatory-frameworks-like-mifid-ii-influenced-the-adoption-and-technical-structure-of-rfq-platforms-in-europe/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) define the outer boundaries of capability and operational potential, while the [commercial criteria](https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-court-objectively-assess-commercial-reasonableness-in-a-derivatives-dispute/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) establish the framework for economic viability and long-term sustainability. The interaction between these two domains dictates the ultimate quality and fit of the procured solution.

The [technical evaluation](https://prime.greeks.live/area/technical-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) serves as a capability audit. It systematically dissects a proposal to verify its functional alignment with the stated requirements. This involves a granular analysis of specifications, performance benchmarks, architectural robustness, and the qualifications of the personnel involved. Each technical criterion acts as a sensor, designed to measure a specific attribute of the proposed solution, from its core processing power to the resilience of its security protocols.

The aggregate of these measurements creates a high-fidelity map of the vendor’s ability to deliver the required operational outcomes. A higher weighting on the technical side signals that the primary objective is to secure a solution with a superior performance envelope, where innovation, precision, and capability are the dominant concerns.

> A well-defined set of evaluation criteria helps to better determine which vendors can successfully accomplish the work if selected.

Conversely, the commercial evaluation functions as a sustainability and efficiency analysis. It extends far beyond the initial price, encompassing a holistic view of the solution’s economic lifecycle. This includes implementation fees, training requirements, recurring licensing costs, maintenance overhead, and the potential for future scalability costs. The commercial weighting reflects the organization’s sensitivity to [total cost of ownership](https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost-of-ownership/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) (TCO) and its strategic imperative to manage resources effectively.

A heavier emphasis on commercial criteria indicates that the procurement decision is driven by a need for economic efficiency, budget predictability, and a favorable long-term financial profile. The process seeks to identify a solution that delivers the necessary capabilities within a defined economic container.

The relationship between these two sets of criteria is symbiotic. A technically superior solution with a prohibitive cost structure is impractical, just as an inexpensive solution that fails to meet critical performance thresholds is useless. The weighting, therefore, is not a simple choice between quality and price. It is a strategic declaration of value.

It articulates which dimension of performance ▴ be it technical excellence or economic efficiency ▴ is the load-bearing wall of the project’s success. The calibration of these weights is the mechanism that ensures the final selection is not merely a winning proposal, but the correct system component for the organization’s operational and financial architecture.

![Precision-engineered beige and teal conduits intersect against a dark void, symbolizing a Prime RFQ protocol interface. Transparent structural elements suggest multi-leg spread connectivity and high-fidelity execution pathways for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/insti-grade-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-multi-leg-execution-junction.jpg)

![A teal-blue textured sphere, signifying a unique RFQ inquiry or private quotation, precisely mounts on a metallic, institutional-grade base. Integrated into a Prime RFQ framework, it illustrates high-fidelity execution and atomic settlement for digital asset derivatives within market microstructure, ensuring capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-prime-os-execution-1.jpg)

## Strategy

Developing a weighting strategy for [RFP evaluation criteria](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation-criteria/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) requires moving beyond a static percentage split and adopting a dynamic calibration framework. The optimal allocation between technical and commercial factors is a function of the procurement’s specific context, its [strategic importance](https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-strategic-importance-of-integrating-last-look-analysis-into-a-broader-tca-framework/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), and its inherent risk profile. The strategy is to construct an evaluation model that accurately reflects the unique value drivers of the project, ensuring the final score is a true proxy for long-term success. A standardized 70/30 or 60/40 split can serve as a baseline, but a sophisticated strategy adapts this ratio based on a rigorous analysis of project objectives.

![A curved grey surface anchors a translucent blue disk, pierced by a sharp green financial instrument and two silver stylus elements. This visualizes a precise RFQ protocol for institutional digital asset derivatives, enabling liquidity aggregation, high-fidelity execution, price discovery, and algorithmic trading within market microstructure via a Principal's operational framework](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-high-fidelity-execution-via-rfq-protocols-optimizing-market-microstructure-and-price-discovery.jpg)

## Frameworks for Weighting Calibration

A primary strategic tool is the use of a multi-layered [weighted scoring model](https://prime.greeks.live/area/weighted-scoring-model/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). This approach deconstructs broad categories like “Technical Capability” and “Commercial Value” into a hierarchy of specific, measurable criteria. This granularity provides a more nuanced and defensible evaluation structure. The strategy involves assigning weights first at the category level (e.g.

Technical vs. Commercial) and then cascading sub-weights to the individual criteria within each category. This hierarchical structure allows for a precise tuning of the evaluation focus.

Another powerful strategic framework is the [Procurement Value Quadrant](https://prime.greeks.live/area/procurement-value-quadrant/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) , which maps procurements based on two axes ▴ Strategic Importance and [Market Complexity](https://prime.greeks.live/area/market-complexity/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite). This mapping helps dictate the appropriate weighting strategy:

- **Strategic Partnerships** ▴ For procurements of high strategic importance in complex markets (e.g. core enterprise systems, long-term research collaborations), the technical weighting should be significantly dominant, often in the 70-80% range. The objective is to secure the best possible capability and foster a long-term relationship where innovation and performance outweigh immediate cost considerations.

- **Leverage Items** ▴ In situations with low strategic importance but high market complexity (e.g. specialized components with multiple suppliers), the weighting can be more balanced. A 50/50 or 60/40 technical/commercial split allows for a competitive tension between price and features, enabling the organization to leverage its buying power.

- **Critical Commodities** ▴ For items of high strategic importance but low market complexity (e.g. essential raw materials with stable pricing), the commercial aspect, particularly reliability of supply and favorable terms, gains prominence. The technical criteria are often pass/fail, with the decision heavily influenced by commercial factors, pushing the balance toward 40/60.

- **Transactional Buys** ▴ With low strategic importance and low market complexity (e.g. office supplies), the commercial criteria are overwhelmingly dominant. The technical requirements are minimal and standardized, making price the primary determinant. A weighting of 20/80 or even 10/90 is appropriate here.

![A translucent blue sphere is precisely centered within beige, dark, and teal channels. This depicts RFQ protocol for digital asset derivatives, enabling high-fidelity execution of a block trade within a controlled market microstructure, ensuring atomic settlement and price discovery on a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-execution-pathway-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-leveraging-rfq-protocols-and-high-fidelity-market-microstructure.jpg)

## Adapting Weights to Project Lifecycle and Risk

The weighting strategy must also account for the project’s lifecycle and inherent risks. For projects involving nascent technologies or significant implementation uncertainty, the technical criteria related to vendor experience, methodology, and support must carry substantial weight. The goal is to mitigate risk by prioritizing proven expertise over a low bid. In contrast, for the procurement of a well-understood product or service in a mature market, the risk is lower, and the commercial criteria can be weighted more heavily to drive competitive pricing.

The table below illustrates how weighting strategies might be adapted for different types of RFP, reflecting a strategic calibration based on context.

| RFP Type | Typical Technical Weight | Typical Commercial Weight | Primary Strategic Driver | Key Evaluation Focus |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Custom Software Development | 75% | 25% | Innovation & Capability | Agile methodology, developer expertise, architectural design, scalability |
| IT Infrastructure Hardware | 60% | 40% | Performance & Reliability | Processing speed, uptime statistics, mean time between failures (MTBF), support SLAs |
| Marketing Agency Services | 50% | 50% | ROI & Creativity | Case studies, creative concepts, proposed team, performance metrics, pricing model |
| Standardized Office Equipment | 30% | 70% | Total Cost of Ownership | Unit price, warranty terms, energy consumption, consumable costs |

Ultimately, the strategic allocation of weights is an exercise in foresight. It requires the [evaluation committee](https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-committee/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) to define a clear vision of success and then engineer a scoring mechanism that leads to that outcome. By making the criteria and their weights transparent to all bidders, the organization signals what it values most, prompting vendors to tailor their proposals accordingly and fostering a more efficient and aligned selection process.

![Abstract forms on dark, a sphere balanced by intersecting planes. This signifies high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives, embodying RFQ protocols and price discovery within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-platform-microstructure-execution-prime-os.jpg)

![A luminous, multi-faceted geometric structure, resembling interlocking star-like elements, glows from a circular base. This represents a Prime RFQ for Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives, symbolizing high-fidelity execution of block trades via RFQ protocols, optimizing market microstructure for price discovery and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system.jpg)

## Execution

The execution of an [RFP evaluation](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) transforms strategic intent into a discrete, auditable process. This phase is about the rigorous application of the weighted criteria to produce a defensible and optimal selection. It requires a disciplined, multi-stage approach that ensures every proposal is measured against the same calibrated system of value. The integrity of the execution phase is paramount; it is where the abstract model of weights and scores meets the tangible reality of vendor proposals, culminating in a decision that carries significant financial and operational consequences.

![Metallic rods and translucent, layered panels against a dark backdrop. This abstract visualizes advanced RFQ protocols, enabling high-fidelity execution and price discovery across diverse liquidity pools for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-market-microstructure-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq.jpg)

## The Operational Playbook for Evaluation

A robust execution process follows a clear, sequential playbook. This operational guide ensures consistency, fairness, and a clear line of sight from the initial criteria to the final decision. The process can be broken down into distinct, action-oriented stages:

- **Committee Formation and Calibration** ▴ Before the RFP is released, a cross-functional evaluation committee must be established. This team should include stakeholders from technical, financial, and operational departments. The first task of this committee is to debate and finalize the [evaluation criteria](https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-criteria/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) and their weights, ensuring collective buy-in on the strategic priorities.

- **Multi-Round Scoring Protocol** ▴ A multi-round evaluation process is highly effective for managing a large volume of proposals.

<li>**Round 1 (Pass/Fail Screening)** ▴ This initial round quickly filters out non-compliant or clearly unqualified proposals. It focuses on mandatory criteria, such as required certifications, minimum years of experience, or financial stability. This conserves valuable evaluation time.

- **Round 2 (Detailed Technical Evaluation)** ▴ The remaining proposals undergo a thorough technical review by subject matter experts. Each proposal is scored against the granular technical criteria defined in the weighting plan. Individual scorecards are completed by each evaluator.

- **Round 3 (Commercial Analysis)** ▴ Concurrently or subsequently, the commercial proposals of the technically qualified vendors are opened and analyzed. This analysis must go beyond the sticker price to calculate a [Total Cost](https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) of Ownership (TCO).

- **Round 4 (Final Deliberation and Selection)** ▴ The committee convenes to review the consolidated scores. This is the stage where the weighted scores are calculated, and a holistic discussion takes place, considering the quantitative results alongside any qualitative factors or red flags.

</li>
- **Score Normalization and Aggregation** ▴ Individual scores from evaluators must be normalized to account for any systematic bias (e.g. some people consistently scoring higher or lower than others). The normalized scores are then multiplied by their respective criteria weights and summed to produce a final weighted score for each proposal.

![Sharp, transparent, teal structures and a golden line intersect a dark void. This symbolizes market microstructure for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-precision-execution-leveraging-granular-market-microstructure-intelligence.jpg)

## Quantitative Modeling and Data Analysis

The core of the execution phase is the quantitative scoring model. This model translates qualitative assessments into numerical data, providing an objective basis for comparison. The following table provides a granular example of a [weighted scoring](https://prime.greeks.live/area/weighted-scoring/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) system for a hypothetical enterprise resource planning (ERP) system procurement, a complex project where technical factors are paramount.

| Evaluation Criterion | Max Points | Weight | Vendor A Score | Vendor A Weighted | Vendor B Score | Vendor B Weighted | Vendor C Score | Vendor C Weighted |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Technical Evaluation (70%) | 100 | 0.70 | | 62.3 | | 56.7 | | 51.1 |
| – Core Functionality | 25 | – | 22 | – | 20 | – | 18 | – |
| – System Architecture & Scalability | 20 | – | 18 | – | 15 | – | 12 | – |
| – Integration Capabilities (APIs) | 15 | – | 14 | – | 12 | – | 13 | – |
| – Data Security & Compliance | 15 | – | 15 | – | 14 | – | 14 | – |
| – Implementation Plan & Support | 25 | – | 20 | – | 20 | – | 19 | – |
| Commercial Evaluation (30%) | 100 | 0.30 | | 22.5 | | 25.5 | | 28.5 |
| – 5-Year TCO Calculation | 100 | – | 75 | – | 85 | – | 95 | – |
| Total Score | – | 1.00 | | 84.8 | | 82.2 | | 79.6 |

In this model, the technical score is calculated by summing the points for the sub-criteria (22+18+14+15+20 = 89 for Vendor A). The final weighted technical score is this sum multiplied by the category weight (89 0.70 = 62.3). The commercial score is calculated inversely, where the lowest TCO receives the highest points. Vendor C, with the lowest TCO, gets 95 points, while Vendor A, the most expensive, gets 75.

These scores are then weighted (e.g. 75 0.30 = 22.5 for Vendor A). The total weighted score determines the ranking. Here, Vendor A wins despite being the most expensive, because its superior technical score, heavily weighted at 70%, offsets its lower commercial score. This demonstrates the power of the weighting system in enforcing strategic priorities.

> The final selection must be based on a transparent, data-driven process that can be audited and defended against challenges.

![A precision-engineered apparatus with a luminous green beam, symbolizing a Prime RFQ for institutional digital asset derivatives. It facilitates high-fidelity execution via optimized RFQ protocols, ensuring precise price discovery and mitigating counterparty risk within market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

## Predictive Scenario Analysis a Case Study

A mid-sized manufacturing firm, “Precision Parts Inc. ” initiated an RFP to replace its aging, disparate collection of legacy business software with a modern, integrated cloud ERP system. The project was deemed highly strategic, as the new system was expected to unify operations, improve data analytics, and provide a platform for future growth. The stakes were high; a successful implementation would create a significant competitive advantage, while a failure could disrupt the entire business.

The evaluation committee, composed of the COO, CFO, IT Director, and Head of Production, immediately faced the central question of weighting. The CFO, focused on a tight budget, argued for a 50/50 split between technical and commercial criteria. He feared that a high-tech, expensive system would strain the company’s finances. The IT Director and Head of Production, however, argued for a 70/30 split in favor of the technical evaluation.

They had firsthand experience with the operational friction caused by the current, inadequate systems and were adamant that capability, usability, and vendor support were the most critical factors for long-term success. After a series of intense debates, the COO sided with the technical team, and they locked in a 70/30 weighting. They defined their technical criteria with extreme detail, focusing on manufacturing-specific modules, real-time inventory tracking, ease of customization, and the quality of the proposed implementation partner. Three vendors made the final round.

Vendor A offered a top-tier, highly-rated ERP solution with a stellar reputation but a correspondingly high price tag. Vendor B proposed a mid-tier solution, well-regarded and more affordable, but lacking some of the advanced analytics features. Vendor C presented a newer, aggressively priced system that promised all the features of the top-tier solution but had a much smaller user base and a less experienced implementation team. The evaluation proceeded.

Vendor A scored exceptionally well on the technical evaluation, earning a 92/100. Its system architecture was robust, its manufacturing module was a perfect fit, and its proposed implementation partner had a long track record of success. Vendor B scored a solid 80/100, meeting all essential requirements but falling short on the “nice-to-have” advanced features. Vendor C scored a surprising 85/100 on paper, as its feature list was impressive, but the committee docked points for the perceived risk associated with its relative newness and the inexperience of its partners.

The commercial evaluation, weighted at 30%, told a different story. Vendor C was the clear winner on price, with a 5-year TCO that was 25% lower than Vendor A’s. Vendor B was in the middle. When the final weighted scores were calculated using the 70/30 split, Vendor A emerged as the winner.

Its commanding lead in the technical evaluation, which carried more than double the weight, was enough to overcome its higher cost. The committee signed the contract with Vendor A. The implementation was challenging but successful, thanks to the expert support from the vendor’s partner. Within 18 months, Precision Parts Inc. saw a 15% reduction in inventory carrying costs and a 10% improvement in on-time delivery rates. The advanced analytics module, which Vendor B lacked, allowed them to identify and eliminate three major production bottlenecks, saving an estimated $500,000 annually.

Now, consider an alternate reality where the CFO had won the argument for a 50/50 weighting. In this scenario, Vendor C’s significant price advantage would have propelled it to the top of the rankings. Precision Parts would have selected the cheaper, riskier option. The implementation would have likely faltered.

The inexperienced partner would struggle to handle the complexities of the manufacturing environment, leading to delays and cost overruns. The promised features might turn out to be buggy or poorly documented. The company would have saved money on the initial contract but would have paid for it many times over in operational disruptions, lost productivity, and the eventual need to bring in expensive consultants to fix the mess. This case study illustrates that the weighting decision is a predictive act.

It is the mechanism by which an organization chooses its future. The 70/30 weighting was a declaration that operational excellence was the primary driver of value, and the final outcome validated that strategic choice.

![Intersecting metallic components symbolize an institutional RFQ Protocol framework. This system enables High-Fidelity Execution and Atomic Settlement for Digital Asset Derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-system-specialists.jpg)

## References

- Doloi, H. (2009). Risk assessment and weighting of criteria for selection of a BOT contractor in the Australian construction industry. _Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135_(9), 879-890.

- Shokri-Ghasabeh, M. & Chileshe, N. (2014). A study of the benefits and barriers of using a weighted scoring method for contractor selection in the Australian construction industry. _Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 19_(2), 29.

- Holt, G. D. (1998). Which contractor selection methodology? _International Journal of Project Management, 16_(3), 153-164.

- Varnäs, A. et al. (2009). Environmental consideration in procurement of construction contracts ▴ a critical review. _International Journal of Project Management, 27_(8), 850-859.

- George Washington University. (n.d.). _RFP Evaluating Criteria_. Finance Division, Procurement. Retrieved from https://finance.gwu.edu/procurement/rfp-evaluating-criteria

- UNICEF. (2022). _Request for Proposal Evaluation Weighting Criteria_. Retrieved from https://www.unicef.org/supply/media/13256/file/LRPS-2022-9176880-Annex1-Evaluation-Weighting-Criteria.pdf

- Euna Solutions. (n.d.). _RFP Evaluation Criteria ▴ Everything You Need to Know_. Retrieved from https://eunasolutions.com/blog/rfp-evaluation-criteria/

- Responsive. (2021, January 14). _A Guide to RFP Evaluation Criteria ▴ Basics, Tips, and Examples_. Retrieved from https://responsive.io/blog/rfp-evaluation-criteria/

![Translucent teal glass pyramid and flat pane, geometrically aligned on a dark base, symbolize market microstructure and price discovery within RFQ protocols for institutional digital asset derivatives. This visualizes multi-leg spread construction, high-fidelity execution via a Principal's operational framework, ensuring atomic settlement for latent liquidity](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/transparent-geometric-structures-visualizing-multi-leg-spread-rfq-protocols-for-high-fidelity-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

## Reflection

![A precise, metallic central mechanism with radiating blades on a dark background represents an Institutional Grade Crypto Derivatives OS. It signifies high-fidelity execution for multi-leg spreads via RFQ protocols, optimizing market microstructure for price discovery and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system-microstructure-hub.jpg)

## Calibrating the Value Engine

The entire exercise of weighting RFP criteria forces an organization to hold a mirror to its own priorities. The final ratio of technical to commercial weighting is more than a number; it is the codified expression of an organization’s operational philosophy and its definition of value. Does the organization define value as near-term cost avoidance, or as long-term capability enhancement? Is the system being procured a simple tool, or is it a foundational component of future strategy?

The numbers chosen for the weighting model are, in essence, the tuning parameters for a complex engine designed to seek out and identify a specific profile of partner and solution. Contemplating this balance compels a level of introspection that transcends the procurement process itself, asking fundamental questions about risk appetite, strategic ambition, and the true cost of both success and failure.

![A polished, light surface interfaces with a darker, contoured form on black. This signifies the RFQ protocol for institutional digital asset derivatives, embodying price discovery and high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-interface.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/commercial-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A golden rod, symbolizing RFQ initiation, converges with a teal crystalline matching engine atop a liquidity pool sphere. This illustrates high-fidelity execution within market microstructure, facilitating price discovery for multi-leg spread strategies on a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-systemic-core.jpg)

## Commercial Evaluation

Meaning ▴ Commercial Evaluation, within crypto Request for Quote (RFQ) processes and institutional trading, refers to the systematic assessment of the financial and economic viability of bids or proposals. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-court-objectively-assess-commercial-reasonableness-in-a-derivatives-dispute/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Dark, pointed instruments intersect, bisected by a luminous stream, against angular planes. This embodies institutional RFQ protocol driving cross-asset execution of digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-best-execution-system-architecture.jpg)

## Commercial Criteria

A court objectively assesses commercial reasonableness by forensically examining the valuation process and its outcome against prevailing market standards. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/how-have-regulatory-frameworks-like-mifid-ii-influenced-the-adoption-and-technical-structure-of-rfq-platforms-in-europe/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Two intersecting metallic structures form a precise 'X', symbolizing RFQ protocols and algorithmic execution in institutional digital asset derivatives. This represents market microstructure optimization, enabling high-fidelity execution of block trades with atomic settlement for capital efficiency via a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-market-microstructure-execution.jpg)

## Technical Criteria

MiFID II has systemically driven RFQ platform adoption by mandating auditable best execution and market transparency. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/technical-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, white, semi-spherical Principal's operational framework opens to precise internal FIX Protocol components. A luminous, reflective blue sphere embodies an institutional-grade digital asset derivative, symbolizing optimal price discovery and a robust liquidity pool](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution-5.jpg)

## Technical Evaluation

Meaning ▴ Technical evaluation, or technical analysis, is a methodology for analyzing and forecasting the direction of prices through the study of past market data, primarily price and volume. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost-of-ownership/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract visualization of institutional digital asset RFQ protocols. Intersecting elements symbolize high-fidelity execution slicing dark liquidity pools, facilitating precise price discovery](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-protocol-execution-intelligence-layer.jpg)

## Total Cost of Ownership

Meaning ▴ Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) is a comprehensive financial metric that quantifies the direct and indirect costs associated with acquiring, operating, and maintaining a product or system throughout its entire lifecycle. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation-criteria/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Interconnected, precisely engineered modules, resembling Prime RFQ components, illustrate an RFQ protocol for digital asset derivatives. The diagonal conduit signifies atomic settlement within a dark pool environment, ensuring high-fidelity execution and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-protocol-engine.jpg)

## Rfp Evaluation Criteria

Meaning ▴ RFP Evaluation Criteria in the context of crypto institutional engagements constitute the specific, predefined benchmarks and qualitative or quantitative metrics employed to objectively assess and compare proposals received from vendors in response to a Request for Proposal. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-strategic-importance-of-integrating-last-look-analysis-into-a-broader-tca-framework/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Luminous blue drops on geometric planes depict institutional Digital Asset Derivatives trading. Large spheres represent atomic settlement of block trades and aggregated inquiries, while smaller droplets signify granular market microstructure data](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-driving-high-fidelity-execution-and-optimal-liquidity-discovery.jpg)

## Strategic Importance

Integrating last look analysis into TCA transforms it from a historical report into a predictive weapon for optimizing execution. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/weighted-scoring-model/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precision-engineered control mechanism, featuring a ribbed dial and prominent green indicator, signifies Institutional Grade Digital Asset Derivatives RFQ Protocol optimization. This represents High-Fidelity Execution, Price Discovery, and Volatility Surface calibration for Algorithmic Trading](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principal-operational-framework-precision-calibration-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-execution-prime-os-and-volatility-surface-optimization.jpg)

## Weighted Scoring Model

Meaning ▴ A Weighted Scoring Model defines a quantitative analytical tool used to evaluate and prioritize multiple alternatives by assigning different levels of importance, or weights, to various evaluation criteria. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/procurement-value-quadrant/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, angular metallic system, an algorithmic trading engine, features a central intelligence layer. It embodies high-fidelity RFQ protocols, optimizing price discovery and best execution for institutional digital asset derivatives, managing counterparty risk and slippage](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-for-best-execution.jpg)

## Procurement Value Quadrant

Meaning ▴ The "Procurement Value Quadrant," in the domain of crypto investing and institutional RFQ processes, is a strategic analytical tool used to categorize and assess different procurement items or vendor relationships based on two principal dimensions ▴ their financial impact (expenditure volume) and their supply market risk (availability, complexity, volatility). </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/market-complexity/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Precision instruments, resembling calibration tools, intersect over a central geared mechanism. This metaphor illustrates the intricate market microstructure and price discovery for institutional digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-execution-engine-microstructure-analytics.jpg)

## Market Complexity

Meaning ▴ Market complexity, within the digital asset ecosystem, refers to the degree of difficulty in comprehending, predicting, and interacting with the behaviors, structures, and interdependencies of various crypto markets. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-committee/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sophisticated mechanism features a segmented disc, indicating dynamic market microstructure and liquidity pool partitioning. This system visually represents an RFQ protocol's price discovery process, crucial for high-fidelity execution of institutional digital asset derivatives and managing counterparty risk within a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/advanced-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-liquidity-aggregation-system.jpg)

## Evaluation Committee

Meaning ▴ An Evaluation Committee, in the context of institutional crypto investing, particularly for large-scale procurement of trading services, technology solutions, or strategic partnerships, refers to a designated group of experts responsible for assessing proposals and making recommendations. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Four sleek, rounded, modular components stack, symbolizing a multi-layered institutional digital asset derivatives trading system. Each unit represents a critical Prime RFQ layer, facilitating high-fidelity execution, aggregated inquiry, and sophisticated market microstructure for optimal price discovery via RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/modular-institutional-crypto-derivatives-trading-system-components.jpg)

## Rfp Evaluation

Meaning ▴ RFP Evaluation is the systematic and objective process of assessing and comparing the proposals submitted by various vendors in response to a Request for Proposal, with the ultimate goal of identifying the most suitable solution or service provider. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-criteria/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek conduit, embodying an RFQ protocol and smart order routing, connects two distinct, semi-spherical liquidity pools. Its transparent core signifies an intelligence layer for algorithmic trading and high-fidelity execution of digital asset derivatives, ensuring atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-engine-bridging-diverse-liquidity-pools-via-high-fidelity-rfq-protocol-orchestration.jpg)

## Evaluation Criteria

Meaning ▴ Evaluation Criteria, within the context of crypto Request for Quote (RFQ) processes and vendor selection for institutional trading infrastructure, represent the predefined, measurable standards or benchmarks against which potential counterparties, technology solutions, or service providers are rigorously assessed. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/total-cost/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract forms depict institutional liquidity aggregation and smart order routing. Intersecting dark bars symbolize RFQ protocols enabling atomic settlement for multi-leg spreads, ensuring high-fidelity execution and price discovery of digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-high-fidelity-execution-2.jpg)

## Total Cost

Meaning ▴ Total Cost represents the aggregated sum of all expenditures incurred in a specific process, project, or acquisition, encompassing both direct and indirect financial outlays. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/weighted-scoring/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A diagonal composition contrasts a blue intelligence layer, symbolizing market microstructure and volatility surface, with a metallic, precision-engineered execution engine. This depicts high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols, ensuring atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

## Weighted Scoring

Meaning ▴ Weighted Scoring, in the context of crypto investing and systems architecture, is a quantitative methodology used for evaluating and prioritizing various options, vendors, or investment opportunities by assigning differential importance (weights) to distinct criteria. </a>

**Tags:** [Technical Vs Commercial Weighting](https://options.greeks.live/area/technical-vs-commercial-weighting/), [Procurement Value Quadrant](https://options.greeks.live/area/procurement-value-quadrant/), [Total Cost of Ownership](https://options.greeks.live/area/total-cost-of-ownership/), [RFP Evaluation Criteria](https://options.greeks.live/area/rfp-evaluation-criteria/), [Market Complexity](https://options.greeks.live/area/market-complexity/), [Evaluation Criteria](https://options.greeks.live/area/evaluation-criteria/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [What Are the Primary Data Sources Required to Build an Accurate Strategic Fit Score for an Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-primary-data-sources-required-to-build-an-accurate-strategic-fit-score-for-an-rfp/)
![A sophisticated proprietary system module featuring precision-engineered components, symbolizing an institutional-grade Prime RFQ for digital asset derivatives. Its intricate design represents market microstructure analysis, RFQ protocol integration, and high-fidelity execution capabilities, optimizing liquidity aggregation and price discovery for block trades within a multi-leg spread environment.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-proprietary-architecture-driving-high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-via-rfq-protocols-and-optimized-market-microstructure-dynamics.jpg)

A strategic fit score quantifies vendor alignment with core enterprise objectives, transforming procurement into a system for value creation.

- 
### [How Do You Weight Innovation versus Cost in a Hybrid Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-weight-innovation-versus-cost-in-a-hybrid-rfp/)
![A transparent, angular teal object with an embedded dark circular lens rests on a light surface. This visualizes an institutional-grade RFQ engine, enabling high-fidelity execution and precise price discovery for digital asset derivatives. It optimizes capital efficiency, manages counterparty risk, supports multi-leg spread strategies, and provides deep market microstructure insights within a Prime RFQ framework.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-engine-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

Calibrating a hybrid RFP is the precise alignment of acquisition cost with the strategic value of a vendor's embedded future potential.

- 
### [What Is the Ideal Size and Composition for an Rfp Evaluation Team for a Complex It Procurement?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-ideal-size-and-composition-for-an-rfp-evaluation-team-for-a-complex-it-procurement/)
![Central teal cylinder, representing a Prime RFQ engine, intersects a dark, reflective, segmented surface. This abstractly depicts institutional digital asset derivatives price discovery, ensuring high-fidelity execution for block trades and liquidity aggregation within market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-core-framework.jpg)

An ideal RFP evaluation team is a precisely engineered decision-making unit, sized and composed to systematically de-risk and validate complex IT investments.

- 
### [How Does a Data-Driven RFP Framework Mitigate Risk in Vendor Selection Processes?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-does-a-data-driven-rfp-framework-mitigate-risk-in-vendor-selection-processes/)
![A central crystalline RFQ engine processes complex algorithmic trading signals, linking to a deep liquidity pool. It projects precise, high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives, optimizing price discovery and mitigating adverse selection.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

A data-driven RFP framework mitigates risk by translating subjective vendor qualities into objective, weighted metrics for a defensible decision.

- 
### [How Should Evaluation Criteria Weighting Differ between a Product and a Service Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-should-evaluation-criteria-weighting-differ-between-a-product-and-a-service-rfp/)
![A sleek metallic device with a central translucent sphere and dual sharp probes. This symbolizes an institutional-grade intelligence layer, driving high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives. It optimizes RFQ protocols, enabling precise price discovery within complex market microstructure for capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-platform-precision.jpg)

Weighting must pivot from a product's objective performance metrics to a service's subjective provider capabilities.

- 
### [What Are the Most Effective Ways to Structure a Multi-Stage Rfp Evaluation Process?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-effective-ways-to-structure-a-multi-stage-rfp-evaluation-process/)
![The abstract composition features a central, multi-layered blue structure representing a sophisticated institutional digital asset derivatives platform, flanked by two distinct liquidity pools. Intersecting blades symbolize high-fidelity execution pathways and algorithmic trading strategies, facilitating private quotation and block trade settlement within a market microstructure optimized for price discovery and capital efficiency.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-execution-1.jpg)

A multi-stage RFP evaluation is a system for deconstructing complex procurement decisions into a sequence of objective, data-driven gates.

- 
### [How Do You Effectively Weight Evaluation Criteria in a Complex It Rfp?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-effectively-weight-evaluation-criteria-in-a-complex-it-rfp/)
![The central teal core signifies a Principal's Prime RFQ, routing RFQ protocols across modular arms. Metallic levers denote precise control over multi-leg spread execution and block trades. This framework ensures high-fidelity execution, optimal price discovery, and efficient management of latent liquidity for institutional digital asset derivatives.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/principals-prime-os-rfq-system-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

A system for translating strategic priorities into a quantitative, defensible framework for high-stakes technology acquisition.

- 
### [How Can a Company Ensure Its Rfp Evaluation Criteria Remain Aligned with Evolving Business Strategies?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-a-company-ensure-its-rfp-evaluation-criteria-remain-aligned-with-evolving-business-strategies/)
![A sophisticated mechanical core, split by contrasting illumination, represents an Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives RFQ engine. Its precise concentric mechanisms symbolize High-Fidelity Execution, Market Microstructure optimization, and Algorithmic Trading within a Prime RFQ, enabling optimal Price Discovery and Liquidity Aggregation.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-engine-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-precision-execution.jpg)

Align RFP criteria with strategy by treating it as a dynamic operating system, not a static checklist, ensuring continuous recalibration.

- 
### [What Are the Key Differences in Evaluation Criteria between an Rfp and an Rfq Stage?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-differences-in-evaluation-criteria-between-an-rfp-and-an-rfq-stage/)
![A sophisticated control panel, featuring concentric blue and white segments with two teal oval buttons. This embodies an institutional RFQ Protocol interface, facilitating High-Fidelity Execution for Private Quotation and Aggregated Inquiry. It represents the Prime RFQ Intelligence Layer, optimizing Capital Efficiency within complex Market Microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-grade-rfq-protocol-interface-for-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

An RFQ evaluation prioritizes price for specified goods, while an RFP evaluation assesses the total value and strategic fit of a proposed solution.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "How Should the Weighting of Evaluation Criteria Differ between Technical and Commercial Aspects of an Rfp?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-should-the-weighting-of-evaluation-criteria-differ-between-technical-and-commercial-aspects-of-an-rfp/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-should-the-weighting-of-evaluation-criteria-differ-between-technical-and-commercial-aspects-of-an-rfp/"
    },
    "headline": "How Should the Weighting of Evaluation Criteria Differ between Technical and Commercial Aspects of an Rfp? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "Weighting RFP criteria is the strategic calibration of a value-assessment system, balancing technical capability against economic sustainability. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/how-should-the-weighting-of-evaluation-criteria-differ-between-technical-and-commercial-aspects-of-an-rfp/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-07T11:20:34+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-10-28T00:06:33+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/advanced-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-liquidity-aggregation-system.jpg",
        "caption": "A precise mechanical instrument with a segmented, rotating disc and a calibration dial. This sophisticated apparatus visualizes an advanced institutional RFQ protocol, enabling efficient price discovery and high-fidelity execution for complex digital asset derivatives. It symbolizes the systematic aggregation of latent liquidity, optimizing multi-leg spread strategies, and mitigating systemic risk through a robust Prime RFQ, ensuring best execution and capital efficiency for large block trades."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Commercial Evaluation",
        "Commercial Proposal Analysis",
        "Evaluation Committee",
        "Evaluation Criteria",
        "Market Complexity",
        "Procurement Strategy",
        "Procurement Value Quadrant",
        "RFP Evaluation",
        "RFP Evaluation Criteria",
        "RFP Scoring Matrix",
        "Strategic Sourcing",
        "Technical Capability Assessment",
        "Technical Evaluation",
        "Technical Vs Commercial Weighting",
        "Total Cost",
        "Total Cost of Ownership",
        "Vendor Selection",
        "Weighted Scoring",
        "Weighted Scoring Model"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/how-should-the-weighting-of-evaluation-criteria-differ-between-technical-and-commercial-aspects-of-an-rfp/
