# In What Ways Can a Quantitative Scoring Matrix for an Rfp Be Manipulated and What Controls Can Prevent This? ▴ Question

**Published:** 2025-08-08
**Categories:** Question

---

![A sleek, high-fidelity beige device with reflective black elements and a control point, set against a dynamic green-to-blue gradient sphere. This abstract representation symbolizes institutional-grade RFQ protocols for digital asset derivatives, ensuring high-fidelity execution and price discovery within market microstructure, powered by an intelligence layer for alpha generation and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-terminal-system.jpg)

![A polished, dark, reflective surface, embodying market microstructure and latent liquidity, supports clear crystalline spheres. These symbolize price discovery and high-fidelity execution within an institutional-grade RFQ protocol for digital asset derivatives, reflecting implied volatility and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-system-1.jpg)

## Concept

A [quantitative scoring matrix](https://prime.greeks.live/area/quantitative-scoring-matrix/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) for a Request for Proposal (RFP) represents a foundational instrument of procedural integrity within institutional procurement. Its purpose is to transmute the complex, multifaceted attributes of competing vendor proposals into a structured, numerical framework, thereby facilitating a decision-making process grounded in objective comparison. This mechanism is predicated on the systematic evaluation of proposals against a predetermined set of criteria, each assigned a specific weight corresponding to its operational importance. The resulting scores are intended to create a defensible [audit trail](https://prime.greeks.live/area/audit-trail/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite), ensuring that the selection of a vendor is not only optimal for the organization’s needs but also demonstrably fair and transparent.

The very structure that gives the [scoring matrix](https://prime.greeks.live/area/scoring-matrix/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) its power ▴ its reliance on quantifiable metrics and weighted values ▴ also presents a surface for sophisticated manipulation. The system’s integrity is not an inherent property but a state that must be rigorously maintained. It operates under the assumption of good faith from its administrators, a vulnerability that can be exploited to steer multimillion-dollar contracts toward a preferred outcome.

The manipulation of this tool is rarely a blunt act of numerical falsification; instead, it is often a subtle perversion of the process, executed by those who understand its mechanics most intimately. The focus of any robust procurement analysis, therefore, must be on the systemic weaknesses that allow for such distortions, rather than merely on the final, corrupted numbers.

> A quantitative scoring matrix is designed to impose objectivity on complex procurement decisions, yet its effectiveness is entirely dependent on the integrity of its design and application.

Understanding the potential for manipulation requires a shift in perspective. One must view the scoring matrix not as a static document but as a dynamic system, susceptible to influence at every stage of its lifecycle. From the initial definition of requirements to the final tabulation of scores, opportunities exist to embed bias and predetermine results.

These actions can originate from internal stakeholders with vested interests, external parties engaging in collusive behavior, or a combination of both. The true challenge lies in discerning these subtle interventions, which often masquerade as legitimate procedural adjustments or sound professional judgment.

![Polished metallic pipes intersect via robust fasteners, set against a dark background. This symbolizes intricate Market Microstructure, RFQ Protocols, and Multi-Leg Spread execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineered-metallic-nodes-illustrating-rfq-protocols-for-multi-leg-digital-asset-derivatives-institutional-execution.jpg)

![Institutional-grade infrastructure supports a translucent circular interface, displaying real-time market microstructure for digital asset derivatives price discovery. Geometric forms symbolize precise RFQ protocol execution, enabling high-fidelity multi-leg spread trading, optimizing capital efficiency and mitigating systemic risk](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-request-for-quote-protocol-high-fidelity-execution-market-microstructure-intelligence-layer.jpg)

## Strategy

Preventing the manipulation of an [RFP scoring](https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-scoring/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) matrix requires a strategic framework that addresses vulnerabilities at their source. The methods of manipulation are not random; they follow predictable patterns that target specific weaknesses in the procurement process. By dissecting these tactics, an organization can develop a coherent and layered defense system. The strategies for manipulation can be broadly categorized into three domains ▴ architectural manipulation of the matrix itself, procedural manipulation during the evaluation phase, and systemic corruption that bypasses the scoring process entirely.

![Abstract spheres and a translucent flow visualize institutional digital asset derivatives market microstructure. It depicts robust RFQ protocol execution, high-fidelity data flow, and seamless liquidity aggregation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-market-microstructure-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-leveraging-rfq-protocols-and-atomic-settlement-across-prime-os.jpg)

## Architectural Manipulation Designing a Biased Framework

The most insidious form of manipulation occurs before any proposals are even submitted. It involves structuring the scoring matrix in a way that is technically “fair” but practically engineered to favor a specific vendor. This is accomplished by manipulating the building blocks of the matrix ▴ the criteria and their corresponding weights.

- **Criterion Gaming** ▴ This involves drafting [evaluation criteria](https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-criteria/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) that are either so hyper-specific that only one known vendor can meet them, or so vague that they allow for maximum subjective interpretation by a biased evaluator. For instance, a criterion might require a proprietary technology exclusive to a favored company or, conversely, use ambiguous terms like “world-class user interface” that lack objective measures.

- **[Weighting Distortion](https://prime.greeks.live/area/weighting-distortion/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)** ▴ The assignment of weights is a critical control point. A manipulator can assign disproportionately high weights to criteria where a favored vendor is strong and low weights to areas where they are weak. A classic example is placing a massive weight on a minor feature unique to one vendor’s offering while minimizing the importance of core requirements like price or service level agreements.

![A precision-engineered teal metallic mechanism, featuring springs and rods, connects to a light U-shaped interface. This represents a core RFQ protocol component enabling automated price discovery and high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/rfq-execution-engine-component-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

## Procedural Manipulation Corrupting the Evaluation Process

Once the proposals are received, the focus of manipulation shifts to the application of the scoring matrix. This is where individual evaluators or a compromised [evaluation committee](https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-committee/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) can steer the outcome, even with a well-designed matrix. These tactics exploit the human element of the evaluation process.

- **[Subjective Scoring](https://prime.greeks.live/area/subjective-scoring/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) Abuse** ▴ Even with clear criteria, evaluators have a degree of discretion. A biased evaluator can consistently award the highest possible scores to a preferred vendor and the lowest possible scores to competitors, often justifying their decisions with vague or unsubstantiated comments. This is particularly effective on qualitative criteria like “Project Management Approach” or “Company Vision.”

- **Inconsistent Application of Standards** ▴ A more subtle tactic involves applying the scoring standards unevenly. A favored vendor might be given the benefit of the doubt on a missing piece of information, while a competitor is penalized harshly for the same omission. The evaluation committee might hold one vendor to the letter of the RFP while allowing another to deviate significantly without penalty.

- **[Conflict of Interest](https://prime.greeks.live/area/conflict-of-interest/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)** ▴ This is a fundamental procedural failure, where an evaluator has an undisclosed financial or personal relationship with a bidder. This conflict invariably leads to biased scoring, as the evaluator’s personal interests are tied to the success of a specific vendor.

![A modular, dark-toned system with light structural components and a bright turquoise indicator, representing a sophisticated Crypto Derivatives OS for institutional-grade RFQ protocols. It signifies private quotation channels for block trades, enabling high-fidelity execution and price discovery through aggregated inquiry, minimizing slippage and information leakage within dark liquidity pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-system-for-optimal-execution-1.jpg)

## Systemic Corruption Bypassing the Matrix

In some cases, the scoring matrix is rendered irrelevant by external or collusive activities that predetermine the winner. These actions represent a fundamental breakdown of procurement integrity.

> The most effective controls are those that assume manipulation is a possibility and are designed to create transparency and accountability at every step.

- **Information Leakage** ▴ A corrupt internal actor can leak confidential information to a favored bidder. This could include details about the budget, the weighting of scoring criteria, or the content of competing bids, giving the recipient an insurmountable advantage.

- **[Bid Rigging](https://prime.greeks.live/area/bid-rigging/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)** ▴ As described in various fraud schemes, this involves [collusion](https://prime.greeks.live/area/collusion/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite) among bidders to eliminate competition. Common forms include bid suppression, where competitors agree not to bid, and complementary bidding, where they submit intentionally high or non-compliant bids to ensure the pre-selected vendor wins. While this is external to the scoring matrix, it makes a mockery of the entire process.

- **Bribery and [Kickbacks](https://prime.greeks.live/area/kickbacks/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite)** ▴ The most direct form of corruption, where a vendor provides financial incentives to procurement officials in exchange for being awarded the contract. In such cases, the scoring matrix is merely a tool for justifying a decision that has already been bought and paid for.

The primary control against these varied threats is the establishment of a robust governance framework. This framework must prioritize transparency, enforce the segregation of duties, and demand rigorous documentation throughout the procurement lifecycle. By anticipating these manipulation strategies, an organization can build a resilient process that is far more difficult to corrupt.

![A sleek, two-toned dark and light blue surface with a metallic fin-like element and spherical component, embodying an advanced Principal OS for Digital Asset Derivatives. This visualizes a high-fidelity RFQ execution environment, enabling precise price discovery and optimal capital efficiency through intelligent smart order routing within complex market microstructure and dark liquidity pools](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-optimizing-market-microstructure-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-capital-efficiency.jpg)

![Abstract depiction of an advanced institutional trading system, featuring a prominent sensor for real-time price discovery and an intelligence layer. Visible circuitry signifies algorithmic trading capabilities, low-latency execution, and robust FIX protocol integration for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-high-fidelity-rfq-protocols.jpg)

## Execution

Translating strategic controls into operational reality requires a granular focus on process, documentation, and oversight. The objective is to construct a procurement system where the opportunities for manipulation are minimized and the probability of detection is maximized. This involves implementing specific, auditable procedures at each stage of the RFP lifecycle.

![A modular, institutional-grade device with a central data aggregation interface and metallic spigot. This Prime RFQ represents a robust RFQ protocol engine, enabling high-fidelity execution for institutional digital asset derivatives, optimizing capital efficiency and best execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/principals-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-prime-os-for-optimized-rfq-protocol-best-execution-system.jpg)

## The Mechanics of a Compromised Matrix a Case Study in Numbers

To understand the practical impact of manipulation, consider a hypothetical RFP for a software system. The evaluation committee has established five criteria with corresponding weights. The table below illustrates an honest evaluation of three vendors.

### Table 1 ▴ Honest RFP Scoring Evaluation

| Evaluation Criterion | Weight | Vendor A Score (1-10) | Vendor A Weighted Score | Vendor B (Preferred) Score (1-10) | Vendor B Weighted Score | Vendor C Score (1-10) | Vendor C Weighted Score |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Technical Compliance | 30% | 9 | 2.7 | 7 | 2.1 | 8 | 2.4 |
| Implementation Timeline | 20% | 8 | 1.6 | 9 | 1.8 | 7 | 1.4 |
| Pricing | 35% | 9 | 3.15 | 6 | 2.1 | 8 | 2.8 |
| Past Performance | 10% | 10 | 1.0 | 8 | 0.8 | 9 | 0.9 |
| Proprietary Feature X | 5% | 0 | 0.0 | 10 | 0.5 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Total Score | 100% | | 8.45 | | 7.30 | | 7.50 |

In this honest evaluation, Vendor A is the clear winner. Now, observe how a manipulator, aiming to select Vendor B, can alter the outcome without changing the fundamental criteria. This is achieved by distorting the weights to favor Vendor B’s strengths.

### Table 2 ▴ Manipulated RFP Scoring Evaluation

| Evaluation Criterion | Manipulated Weight | Vendor A Score (1-10) | Vendor A Weighted Score | Vendor B (Preferred) Score (1-10) | Vendor B Weighted Score | Vendor C Score (1-10) | Vendor C Weighted Score |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Technical Compliance | 15% | 9 | 1.35 | 7 | 1.05 | 8 | 1.2 |
| Implementation Timeline | 30% | 8 | 2.4 | 9 | 2.7 | 7 | 2.1 |
| Pricing | 15% | 9 | 1.35 | 6 | 0.9 | 8 | 1.2 |
| Past Performance | 10% | 10 | 1.0 | 8 | 0.8 | 9 | 0.9 |
| Proprietary Feature X | 30% | 0 | 0.0 | 10 | 3.0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Total Score | 100% | | 6.10 | | 8.45 | | 5.40 |

By dramatically increasing the weight of “Proprietary Feature X” (which only Vendor B has) and “Implementation Timeline” (where Vendor B is strongest), while simultaneously down-weighting “Pricing” and “Technical Compliance” (where Vendor A is superior), the final result is inverted. Vendor B is now the winner. This demonstrates a sophisticated manipulation that can be difficult to challenge without a rigorous control framework.

![A vibrant blue digital asset, encircled by a sleek metallic ring representing an RFQ protocol, emerges from a reflective Prime RFQ surface. This visualizes sophisticated market microstructure and high-fidelity execution within an institutional liquidity pool, ensuring optimal price discovery and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-high-fidelity-execution-framework.jpg)

## A Framework of Controls

To counter such manipulations, a multi-layered system of controls is necessary. These controls should be both preventive (designed to stop manipulation before it happens) and detective (designed to identify manipulation after it has occurred).

- **Establish an Independent Evaluation Committee** ▴ 

<li>**Composition** ▴ The committee should consist of a cross-functional team, including members from procurement, legal, technical, and end-user departments. The inclusion of an external, independent third-party expert can add a significant layer of objectivity.

- **Mandate** ▴ The committee’s first task must be to review and approve the scoring criteria and weights before the RFP is released. This approval must be formally documented and signed off by all members.

- **Conflict of Interest Declarations** ▴ Every member must sign a declaration stating they have no conflicts of interest with any of the potential bidders. This should be a formal, legally reviewed document.

</li>
- **Enforce Rigorous Criteria and Weighting Discipline** ▴ 

<li>**Justification Mandate** ▴ Every single evaluation criterion must be directly traceable to a documented business or technical requirement. A written justification must be provided for the weight assigned to each criterion, explaining its importance to the project’s success.

- **Prohibition of Sole-Source Criteria** ▴ Any criterion that can, to the committee’s knowledge, be met by only one vendor must be disallowed unless a formal sole-source justification is approved by a higher authority.

- **Weighting Caps** ▴ Consider implementing policies that cap the maximum weight that can be assigned to a single criterion (e.g. no more than 35%) to prevent the kind of distortion seen in the manipulated table above.

</li>
- **Implement a Structured and Transparent Scoring Process** ▴ 

<li>**Scoring Rubrics** ▴ Do not just provide a scale of 1-10. Develop a detailed scoring rubric that defines what constitutes a score of 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10 for each criterion. For example, a “10” in “Past Performance” might require “Five successful implementations of similar scale with positive client references,” while a “5” might be “At least one successful implementation.”

- **Independent Scoring and Consensus** ▴ Each evaluator should score the proposals independently first. Afterward, the committee convenes to discuss the scores. Any significant variance in scores for a particular item must be discussed and a consensus reached, with the rationale for the final score documented.

- **Mandatory Comments** ▴ Require evaluators to provide a written comment justifying every score they give. This creates an audit trail and forces evaluators to articulate their reasoning, making subjective abuse more difficult.

</li>
- **Conduct Post-Award Audits** ▴ 

<li>**Internal Audit Review** ▴ A selection of high-value or contentious RFP awards should be subject to a post-award review by the internal audit department. This review should examine the entire process, from the development of the scoring matrix to the final decision.

- **Performance Monitoring** ▴ The winning vendor’s performance should be monitored against the promises made in their proposal. Significant deviations could be a red flag that the proposal was unrealistic and won through manipulation.

</li>

By embedding these execution-level controls into the procurement workflow, an organization creates a system that is not reliant on the assumed integrity of individuals. It builds a verifiable, transparent, and defensible process that protects public funds and ensures that the best vendor, not the best-connected vendor, is selected.

![A polished metallic needle, crowned with a faceted blue gem, precisely inserted into the central spindle of a reflective digital storage platter. This visually represents the high-fidelity execution of institutional digital asset derivatives via RFQ protocols, enabling atomic settlement and liquidity aggregation through a sophisticated Prime RFQ intelligence layer for optimal price discovery and alpha generation](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-optimization-for-high-fidelity-execution-and-liquidity-aggregation-via-prime-os-intelligence-layer.jpg)

## References

- International Anti-Corruption Resource Center. “The Most Common Procurement Fraud Schemes and their Primary Red Flags.” IACRC.

- Bothwell Law Group. “What is Bid Rigging Fraud ▴ Comprehensive Guide.” Bothwell Law Group.

- “The Anatomy of Procurement Fraud ▴ Common Schemes and Red Flags.” Public Sector Network. 22 May 2024.

- “Bid rigging.” Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation, 10 July 2024.

- Gorin, Dmitry. “Common Types of Government Procurement Fraud.” Eisner Gorin LLP, 26 March 2024.

![A central multi-quadrant disc signifies diverse liquidity pools and portfolio margin. A dynamic diagonal band, an RFQ protocol or private quotation channel, bisects it, enabling high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-rfq-protocols-for-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives.jpg)

## Reflection

![Interlocking transparent and opaque geometric planes on a dark surface. This abstract form visually articulates the intricate Market Microstructure of Institutional Digital Asset Derivatives, embodying High-Fidelity Execution through advanced RFQ protocols](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/geometric-abstraction-of-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-market-microstructure-driving-high-fidelity-execution-via-principal-rfq-protocols-and-optimal-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

## From Matrix to Mechanism

The examination of the quantitative scoring matrix reveals a fundamental truth of institutional governance ▴ any system, no matter how logically constructed, is ultimately a human enterprise. Its resilience is a function of the controls that gird it and the professional ethics of those who operate it. Viewing the RFP scoring process as a simple administrative task is a critical error; it is a complex mechanism for allocating capital and managing risk. The vulnerabilities exposed are not merely flaws in a spreadsheet but fissures in an organization’s operational integrity.

The knowledge of how this system can be perverted is not an invitation to cynicism. Instead, it is a call to architectural fortitude. It compels a shift from a compliance-based mindset, focused on ticking boxes, to a systems-based approach focused on building a truly robust and transparent decision-making framework.

The ultimate control is a culture of accountability, where the rigor of the process is valued as highly as the outcome itself. The matrix is a tool; the integrity of the system it serves is the true asset.

![A dark, reflective surface displays a luminous green line, symbolizing a high-fidelity RFQ protocol channel within a Crypto Derivatives OS. This signifies precise price discovery for digital asset derivatives, ensuring atomic settlement and optimizing portfolio margin](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-pathway-optimizing-principal-liquidity-and-capital-efficiency.jpg)

## Glossary

<a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/quantitative-scoring-matrix/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A precise mechanical instrument with intersecting transparent and opaque hands, representing the intricate market microstructure of institutional digital asset derivatives. This visual metaphor highlights dynamic price discovery and bid-ask spread dynamics within RFQ protocols, emphasizing high-fidelity execution and latent liquidity through a robust Prime RFQ for atomic settlement](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/precision-engineering-driving-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-execution-across-advanced-rfq-protocols-and-prime-brokerage-frameworks.jpg)

## Quantitative Scoring Matrix

Meaning ▴ A Quantitative Scoring Matrix is a formalized analytical framework designed to objectively evaluate complex entities or scenarios by assigning numerical scores across a predefined set of weighted criteria, culminating in a composite metric that facilitates data-driven decision-making within institutional contexts. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/audit-trail/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sophisticated mechanical system featuring a translucent, crystalline blade-like component, embodying a Prime RFQ for Digital Asset Derivatives. This visualizes high-fidelity execution of RFQ protocols, demonstrating aggregated inquiry and price discovery within market microstructure](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system-microstructure-1.jpg)

## Audit Trail

Meaning ▴ An Audit Trail is a chronological, immutable record of system activities, operations, or transactions within a digital environment, detailing event sequence, user identification, timestamps, and specific actions. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/scoring-matrix/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A complex, multi-layered electronic component with a central connector and fine metallic probes. This represents a critical Prime RFQ module for institutional digital asset derivatives trading, enabling high-fidelity execution of RFQ protocols, price discovery, and atomic settlement for multi-leg spreads with minimal latency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/institutional-digital-asset-rfq-engine-driving-best-execution-and-liquidity.jpg)

## Scoring Matrix

Meaning ▴ A scoring matrix is a computational construct assigning quantitative values to inputs within automated decision frameworks. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/rfp-scoring/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A sleek, white, semi-spherical Principal's operational framework opens to precise internal FIX Protocol components. A luminous, reflective blue sphere embodies an institutional-grade digital asset derivative, symbolizing optimal price discovery and a robust liquidity pool](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocols-high-fidelity-execution-5.jpg)

## Rfp Scoring

Meaning ▴ RFP Scoring defines the structured, quantitative methodology employed to evaluate and rank vendor proposals received in response to a Request for Proposal, particularly for complex technology and service procurements within institutional digital asset derivatives. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-criteria/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A gleaming, translucent sphere with intricate internal mechanisms, flanked by precision metallic probes, symbolizes a sophisticated Principal's RFQ engine. This represents the atomic settlement of multi-leg spread strategies, enabling high-fidelity execution and robust price discovery within institutional digital asset derivatives markets, minimizing latency and slippage for optimal alpha generation and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/inst-digital-asset-deriv-rfq-os-for-optimal-high-fidelity-trade-exec.jpg)

## Evaluation Criteria

Meaning ▴ Evaluation Criteria define the quantifiable metrics and qualitative standards against which the performance, compliance, or risk profile of a system, strategy, or transaction is rigorously assessed. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/weighting-distortion/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A futuristic apparatus visualizes high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives. A transparent sphere represents a private quotation or block trade, balanced on a teal Principal's operational framework, signifying capital efficiency within an RFQ protocol](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-via-prime-os.jpg)

## Weighting Distortion

Meaning ▴ Weighting Distortion refers to the measurable deviation of a portfolio's or index's realized component weights from their intended or target allocations, specifically due to the complex interplay of market microstructure effects during execution or rebalancing. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/evaluation-committee/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A deconstructed mechanical system with segmented components, revealing intricate gears and polished shafts, symbolizing the transparent, modular architecture of an institutional digital asset derivatives trading platform. This illustrates multi-leg spread execution, RFQ protocols, and atomic settlement processes](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/deconstructed-principal-trading-system-revealing-core-mechanics-of-digital-asset-derivatives-execution.jpg)

## Evaluation Committee

Meaning ▴ An Evaluation Committee constitutes a formally constituted internal governance body responsible for the systematic assessment of proposals, solutions, or counterparties, ensuring alignment with an institution's strategic objectives and operational parameters within the digital asset ecosystem. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/subjective-scoring/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Abstract geometric forms, including overlapping planes and central spherical nodes, visually represent a sophisticated institutional digital asset derivatives trading ecosystem. It depicts complex multi-leg spread execution, dynamic RFQ protocol liquidity aggregation, and high-fidelity algorithmic trading within a Prime RFQ framework, ensuring optimal price discovery and capital efficiency](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-liquidity-aggregation-market-microstructure-high-fidelity-execution-alpha-generation-prime-os-capital-efficiency.jpg)

## Subjective Scoring

Meaning ▴ Subjective scoring involves the systematic application of human judgment to assign qualitative values or ranks to entities, particularly when precise quantitative metrics are either unavailable or insufficient for comprehensive evaluation. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/conflict-of-interest/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A smooth, light-beige spherical module features a prominent black circular aperture with a vibrant blue internal glow. This represents a dedicated institutional grade sensor or intelligence layer for high-fidelity execution](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-intelligence-layer-for-optimal-digital-asset-rfq-execution.jpg)

## Conflict of Interest

Meaning ▴ A conflict of interest arises when an individual or entity holds two or more interests, one of which could potentially corrupt the motivation for an act in the other, particularly concerning professional duties or fiduciary responsibilities within financial markets. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/bid-rigging/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A diagonal metallic framework supports two dark circular elements with blue rims, connected by a central oval interface. This represents an institutional-grade RFQ protocol for digital asset derivatives, facilitating block trade execution, high-fidelity execution, dark liquidity, and atomic settlement on a Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/optimized-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-trading-system-rfq-protocols-and-atomic-settlement.jpg)

## Bid Rigging

Meaning ▴ Bid rigging constitutes a collusive, anti-competitive scheme where ostensibly independent parties coordinate their bids in a competitive process to manipulate the outcome, thereby subverting fair price discovery and the natural dynamics of supply and demand. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/collusion/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![Intricate internal machinery reveals a high-fidelity execution engine for institutional digital asset derivatives. Precision components, including a multi-leg spread mechanism and data flow conduits, symbolize a sophisticated RFQ protocol facilitating atomic settlement and robust price discovery within a principal's Prime RFQ](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-engine-microstructure.jpg)

## Collusion

Meaning ▴ Collusion signifies a clandestine agreement among market participants to manipulate prices or restrict competition, directly subverting open market operation. </a><a href="https://prime.greeks.live/area/kickbacks/?utm_source=options.greeks.live&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=satellite" class="glossary-item-box">
![A futuristic system component with a split design and intricate central element, embodying advanced RFQ protocols. This visualizes high-fidelity execution, precise price discovery, and granular market microstructure control for institutional digital asset derivatives, optimizing liquidity provision and minimizing slippage](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/advanced-rfq-protocols-for-digital-asset-derivatives-price-discovery.jpg)

## Kickbacks

Meaning ▴ A kickback constitutes an undisclosed financial inducement or payment, typically from one party to another, in exchange for preferential treatment or a specific business action. </a>

**Tags:** [Conflict of Interest](https://options.greeks.live/area/conflict-of-interest/), [Audit Trail](https://options.greeks.live/area/audit-trail/), [Evaluation Committee](https://options.greeks.live/area/evaluation-committee/), [Evaluation Criteria](https://options.greeks.live/area/evaluation-criteria/), [Collusion](https://options.greeks.live/area/collusion/), [Vendor Selection](https://options.greeks.live/area/vendor-selection/)	

## Discover More

- 
### [What Are the Most Common Pitfalls to Avoid When Creating an Rfp Scoring System?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-pitfalls-to-avoid-when-creating-an-rfp-scoring-system/)
![A sleek blue and white mechanism with a focused lens symbolizes Pre-Trade Analytics for Digital Asset Derivatives. A glowing turquoise sphere represents a Block Trade within a Liquidity Pool, demonstrating High-Fidelity Execution via RFQ protocol for Price Discovery in Dark Pool Market Microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/advanced-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-system-for-optimal-price-discovery-and-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

An RFP scoring system's primary pitfalls are improper criteria weighting, inconsistent evaluation, and undefined scoring scales.

- 
### [What Are the Best Practices for Structuring a Cross-Functional Rfp Evaluation Committee?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-best-practices-for-structuring-a-cross-functional-rfp-evaluation-committee/)
![Symmetrical internal components, light green and white, converge at central blue nodes. This abstract representation embodies a Principal's operational framework, enabling high-fidelity execution of institutional digital asset derivatives via advanced RFQ protocols, optimizing market microstructure for price discovery.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-execution-engine-core.jpg)

A cross-functional RFP committee is a purpose-built system for converting diverse expertise into an optimal, risk-mitigated procurement decision.

- 
### [How Can an Organization Effectively Document Its Rfp Evaluation for Audit Purposes?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-effectively-document-its-rfp-evaluation-for-audit-purposes/)
![An institutional-grade platform's RFQ protocol interface, with a price discovery engine and precision guides, enables high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives. Integrated controls optimize market microstructure and liquidity aggregation within a Principal's operational framework.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/proprietary-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-engine-facilitating-high-fidelity-execution-and-granular-market-microstructure-analysis-for-prime-os.jpg)

An auditable RFP evaluation record is a systematically constructed, unalterable framework of evidence that proves procedural fairness and strategic intent.

- 
### [How Can a Weighted Scoring Model Improve RFP Evaluation Objectivity?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-a-weighted-scoring-model-improve-rfp-evaluation-objectivity/)
![A central toroidal structure and intricate core are bisected by two blades: one algorithmic with circuits, the other solid. This symbolizes an institutional digital asset derivatives platform, leveraging RFQ protocols for high-fidelity execution and price discovery. It optimizes market microstructure for capital efficiency, managing multi-leg spreads and latent liquidity within a Principal's operational framework.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-hub-integrating-algorithmic-intelligence-for-high-fidelity-price-discovery-and-liquidity-aggregation.jpg)

A weighted scoring model improves RFP objectivity by translating subjective criteria into a quantitative, auditable decision-making framework.

- 
### [How Can an Organization Effectively Mitigate the Impact of Internal Politics on Rfp Weighting?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-can-an-organization-effectively-mitigate-the-impact-of-internal-politics-on-rfp-weighting/)
![Internal mechanism with translucent green guide, dark components. Represents Market Microstructure of Institutional Grade Crypto Derivatives OS. Visualizes High-Fidelity Execution via RFQ Protocols, enabling Price Discovery, Atomic Settlement for Digital Asset Derivatives.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-crypto-derivatives-rfq-engine-for-high-fidelity-execution.jpg)

An organization mitigates political RFP influence by engineering a Governed Evaluation Framework that systematizes decision-making.

- 
### [How Do You Create a Fair and Objective RFP Scoring System?](https://options.greeks.live/question/how-do-you-create-a-fair-and-objective-rfp-scoring-system/)
![A smooth, off-white sphere rests within a meticulously engineered digital asset derivatives RFQ platform, featuring distinct teal and dark blue metallic components. This sophisticated market microstructure enables private quotation, high-fidelity execution, and optimized price discovery for institutional block trades, ensuring capital efficiency and best execution.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-system-microstructure-core.jpg)

A fair RFP scoring system translates strategic priorities into a quantitative, defensible decision-making architecture for optimal vendor selection.

- 
### [What Are the Key Components of a Defensible and Transparent Rfp Scoring Model?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-key-components-of-a-defensible-and-transparent-rfp-scoring-model/)
![A futuristic apparatus visualizes high-fidelity execution for digital asset derivatives. A transparent sphere represents a private quotation or block trade, balanced on a teal Principal's operational framework, signifying capital efficiency within an RFQ protocol. The sharp upper blade implies price discovery and best execution across market microstructure.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-execution-via-prime-os.jpg)

A defensible RFP scoring model translates strategic priorities into a transparent, auditable system for objective vendor selection.

- 
### [What Is the Role of Third-Party Auditors in Ensuring the Fairness and Integrity of an RFP Process?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-is-the-role-of-third-party-auditors-in-ensuring-the-fairness-and-integrity-of-an-rfp-process/)
![A sleek, futuristic apparatus featuring a central spherical processing unit flanked by dual reflective surfaces and illuminated data conduits. This system visually represents an advanced RFQ protocol engine facilitating high-fidelity execution and liquidity aggregation for institutional digital asset derivatives. It embodies precise price discovery, multi-leg spread processing, and atomic settlement within a Prime RFQ framework.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-digital-asset-options-rfq-liquidity-aggregation-interface.jpg)

A third-party auditor provides independent, objective verification that an RFP process is fair, compliant, and defensible.

- 
### [What Are the Most Common Pitfalls in Designing an Rfp Scoring Rubric?](https://options.greeks.live/question/what-are-the-most-common-pitfalls-in-designing-an-rfp-scoring-rubric/)
![A beige Prime RFQ chassis features a glowing teal transparent panel, symbolizing an Intelligence Layer for high-fidelity execution. A clear tube, representing a private quotation channel, holds a precise instrument for algorithmic trading of digital asset derivatives, ensuring atomic settlement.](https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/prime-os-rfq-digital-asset-derivatives-high-fidelity-execution-system-interface.jpg)

The most common pitfalls in designing an RFP scoring rubric stem from a failure to strategically align weighting with project value and to implement clear, objective criteria, leading to biased and indefensible selection outcomes.

---

## Raw Schema Data

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "BreadcrumbList",
    "itemListElement": [
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 1,
            "name": "Home",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 2,
            "name": "Question",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/"
        },
        {
            "@type": "ListItem",
            "position": 3,
            "name": "In What Ways Can a Quantitative Scoring Matrix for an Rfp Be Manipulated and What Controls Can Prevent This?",
            "item": "https://options.greeks.live/question/in-what-ways-can-a-quantitative-scoring-matrix-for-an-rfp-be-manipulated-and-what-controls-can-prevent-this/"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Organization",
    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization",
    "name": "Greeks.Live",
    "url": "https://greeks.live/",
    "description": "Greeks.live is the definitive toolkit for the professional options trader, dedicated to empowering our users with institutional-grade data, advanced analytics, and a comprehensive suite of trading tools designed to provide a decisive edge in the market. Every article and guide published under the Greeks.live name is a product of our deep commitment to data-driven analysis and our mission to support the global trading community.",
    "email": "support@greeks.live",
    "logo": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Greeks.Live-Logo-Icon.svg"
    },
    "hasPart": [
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "About Us",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "App Download Page",
            "url": "https://about.greeks.live/#/download/basic_trade"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Newcomers' Guide",
            "url": "https://twisty-sign-c8b.notion.site/Guide-for-Greeks-live-X-Deribit-Newbies-5a08a3052822427d800af6eaf3704c8d"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Knowledge Base",
            "url": "https://linktr.ee/greeks.live"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Option Terminology",
            "url": "https://greekslive.notion.site/88dfc00e7c584d4d8969b6302a79a12f?pvs=4"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Terms of Service",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/tos"
        },
        {
            "@type": "WebSite",
            "name": "Disclaimer",
            "url": "https://greeks.live/#/disclaimer"
        }
    ],
    "sameAs": [
        "https://x.com/greekslive",
        "https://youtube.com/@greeks_live?si=-KjT0Lkw4WUCI0tD",
        "https://t.me/greekslive_notifications",
        "https://t.me/greekslive",
        "https://pinterest.com/greekslive/"
    ],
    "makesOffer": [
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "RFQ Platform",
                "url": "https://rfq.greeks.live",
                "description": "Execute institutional-grade block trades for crypto options and futures. This platform provides deep, over-the-counter (OTC) liquidity via a professional Request for Quote system.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Lending Tools",
                "url": "https://lend.greeks.live",
                "description": "Manage crypto lending and borrowing activities to earn yield or secure loans. This suite of tools helps users analyze interest rates and manage collateralized debt positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Data Lab",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/datalab/BTC",
                "description": "Analyze historical and real-time options data with advanced metrics. This tool is designed for backtesting strategies and identifying market trends through comprehensive data visualization.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Profit & Loss Analysis (PnL)",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pnl_analysis",
                "description": "Track and analyze the Profit and Loss (PnL) of your options portfolio. This tool provides detailed performance metrics to help traders evaluate and refine their strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Position Visualization",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/pv/BTC",
                "description": "Visualize complex options positions and their corresponding risk profiles. This tool generates payoff diagrams to help traders intuitively understand potential profit, loss, and exposure.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Options Calculator",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/#/deribit/tools/calculator",
                "description": "Calculate the theoretical price and risk parameters ('the Greeks') of crypto options. An essential tool for pricing new trades and analyzing the sensitivity of existing positions.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live Main Platform",
                "url": "https://greeks.live/",
                "description": "The central hub for the Greeks.live suite of professional cryptocurrency options and derivatives trading tools. Access analytics, manage positions, and explore the ecosystem.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Community Forum",
                "url": "https://t.greeks.live",
                "description": "Join the official Greeks.live community. Connect with other traders, share insights, and receive the latest updates directly from the team.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for Deribit",
                "url": "http://deribit.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the Deribit exchange. This platform leverages Greeks.live's advanced analytics and tools specifically for users of Deribit's options and futures markets.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "Greeks.live for OKX",
                "url": "http://okx.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated interface for trading on the OKX exchange. This platform integrates Greeks.live's powerful analytics with the OKX marketplace, focusing on its options and derivatives products.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "GLVS.AI Trading Platform",
                "url": "https://www.glvs.ai/",
                "description": "An AI-powered platform for automated crypto options trading. Leverage advanced algorithms and data-driven signals to develop and deploy sophisticated, hands-free trading strategies.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        },
        {
            "@type": "Offer",
            "itemOffered": {
                "@type": "Service",
                "name": "API Testnet & Sandbox",
                "url": "https://test.greeks.live",
                "description": "A dedicated testnet environment for developers to test their API integrations and automated trading strategies. This sandbox allows for full functionality testing without risking real funds.",
                "provider": {
                    "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
                }
            }
        }
    ],
    "subOrganization": [
        {
            "@type": "Organization",
            "name": "GreeksLive HK Co., Limited",
            "email": "support@greeks.live",
            "telephone": "+852-56418949",
            "address": {
                "@type": "PostalAddress",
                "streetAddress": "Unit 11, 27/F, K. Wah Centre, 191 Java Road",
                "addressLocality": "Hong Kong",
                "addressRegion": "North Point",
                "addressCountry": "CN",
                "postalCode": "0000"
            },
            "geo": {
                "@type": "GeoCoordinates",
                "latitude": "22.2932357",
                "longitude": "114.2022026"
            },
            "image": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Wah-Centre-Hong-Kong.jpg"
        }
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "Article",
    "mainEntityOfPage": {
        "@type": "WebPage",
        "@id": "https://options.greeks.live/question/in-what-ways-can-a-quantitative-scoring-matrix-for-an-rfp-be-manipulated-and-what-controls-can-prevent-this/"
    },
    "headline": "In What Ways Can a Quantitative Scoring Matrix for an Rfp Be Manipulated and What Controls Can Prevent This? \u25b4 Question",
    "description": "A quantitative RFP scoring matrix is manipulated by distorting criteria and weights to pre-select a winner; robust controls prevent this by enforcing transparency and independent oversight. \u25b4 Question",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/question/in-what-ways-can-a-quantitative-scoring-matrix-for-an-rfp-be-manipulated-and-what-controls-can-prevent-this/",
    "datePublished": "2025-08-08T16:18:20+00:00",
    "dateModified": "2025-08-08T16:18:28+00:00",
    "articleSection": [
        "Question"
    ],
    "author": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "publisher": {
        "@id": "https://greeks.live/#organization"
    },
    "image": {
        "@type": "ImageObject",
        "url": "https://options.greeks.live/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/high-fidelity-institutional-digital-asset-derivatives-rfq-protocol-controls.jpg",
        "caption": "This abstract view of a Principal's trading desk interface highlights high-fidelity execution components. The precision trackball and granular controls on the teal RFQ protocol strip enable system specialists to navigate market microstructure complexities. Such institutional-grade design optimizes atomic settlement and capital efficiency for digital asset derivatives, managing implied volatility and gamma exposure across dark pools and liquidity aggregation layers, ensuring best execution and robust portfolio margin."
    },
    "keywords": [
        "Audit Trail",
        "Bid Rigging",
        "Collusion",
        "Conflict of Interest",
        "Evaluation Committee",
        "Evaluation Criteria",
        "Internal Controls",
        "Kickbacks",
        "Procurement Fraud",
        "Procurement Governance",
        "Quantitative Scoring Matrix",
        "RFP Scoring",
        "Scoring Matrix",
        "Subjective Scoring",
        "Transparency in Procurement",
        "Vendor Selection",
        "Weighting Distortion"
    ]
}
```

```json
{
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "@type": "WebSite",
    "url": "https://options.greeks.live/",
    "potentialAction": {
        "@type": "SearchAction",
        "target": "https://options.greeks.live/?s=search_term_string",
        "query-input": "required name=search_term_string"
    }
}
```


---

**Original URL:** https://options.greeks.live/question/in-what-ways-can-a-quantitative-scoring-matrix-for-an-rfp-be-manipulated-and-what-controls-can-prevent-this/
